North Carolina State University
2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey:

Results for the College of Physical and Mathematical Sciences
by Rank/Tenure Status1

To skip directly to a particular section, select the section below.

Section B: Image and Vision	Section I: Post-Tenure Review
Section C: Leadership	Section J: Pay and Compensation
Section D: Faculty-Administration Relationships	Section K: Campus Infrastructure/Physical Environment
Section E: Diversity/Multiculturalism	Section L: Recreation/Wellness
Section F: Working Relationships	Section M: Work Activities
Section G: Faculty Support & Professional Development	Section N: Conclusions/Overall Satisfaction
Section H: Performance Review, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure

A2: Ever held an administrative position	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
..... No (%)	68.3	81.8	95.2	73.3
..... Yes (%)	31.7	18.2	4.8	26.7
Total (N)	60	22	21	15

Back to Top

Section B: Image and Vision

B1a: Department doing good job of recruiting faculty	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.2	3.3	3.2	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	32.8	31.8	47.6	14.3
3: Agree (%)	58.6	68.2	28.6	57.1
2: Disagree (%)	5.2	.	19.0	21.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.4	.	4.8	7.1
Total (N)	58	22	21	14

B1b: Department creating culture where faculty can develop to full potential	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	3.1	3.0	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	24.1	31.8	33.3	7.1
3: Agree (%)	46.6	45.5	42.9	64.3
2: Disagree (%)	25.9	22.7	19.0	21.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.4	.	4.8	7.1
Total (N)	58	22	21	14

B1c: Department retaining most effective and productive faculty	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.7	3.0	2.7	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	15.8	14.3	21.1	7.7
3: Agree (%)	49.1	66.7	42.1	53.8
2: Disagree (%)	24.6	19.0	26.3	15.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	10.5	.	10.5	23.1
Total (N)	57	21	19	13

B2a: Department national reputation for undergraduate educ	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.8	3.8	4.1	3.8
5: Very strong (%)	19.3	19.0	33.3	7.7
4: Strong (%)	40.4	42.9	42.9	69.2
3: Average (%)	36.8	38.1	23.8	23.1
2: Weak (%)	3.5	.	.	.
Total (N)	57	21	21	13

B2b: Department national reputation for graduate education	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.6	3.6	3.5	3.7
5: Very strong (%)	15.0	9.5	4.8	16.7
4: Strong (%)	40.0	47.6	42.9	33.3
3: Average (%)	40.0	38.1	47.6	50.0
2: Weak (%)	3.3	4.8	4.8	.
1: Very weak (%)	1.7	.	.	.
Total (N)	60	21	21	12

B2c: Department national reputation for research & scholarly activity	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.8	3.8	4.0	3.9
5: Very strong (%)	10.0	4.8	23.8	28.6
4: Strong (%)	61.7	66.7	57.1	28.6
3: Average (%)	25.0	28.6	14.3	42.9
2: Weak (%)	3.3	.	4.8	.
Total (N)	60	21	21	14

B2d: Department national reputation for creative artistry and literature	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.5	3.0	4.3	3.7
5: Very strong (%)	12.5	.	50.0	.
4: Strong (%)	37.5	50.0	25.0	66.7
3: Average (%)	37.5	25.0	25.0	33.3
2: Weak (%)	12.5	.	.	.
1: Very weak (%)	.	25.0	.	.
Total (N)	8	4	4	3

B2e: Department national reputation for tech & managerial innovation	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.3	3.6	4.0	3.4
5: Very strong (%)	.	13.3	10.0	.
4: Strong (%)	38.7	33.3	80.0	37.5
3: Average (%)	54.8	53.3	10.0	62.5
2: Weak (%)	6.5	.	.	.
Total (N)	31	15	10	8

B2f: Department national reputation for extension & engagement	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.5	3.5	4.0	3.2
5: Very strong (%)	6.8	11.8	11.1	10.0
4: Strong (%)	43.2	35.3	77.8	20.0
3: Average (%)	40.9	47.1	11.1	50.0
2: Weak (%)	9.1	5.9	.	20.0
Total (N)	44	17	18	10

B2g: Department national reputation for contrib to econ Development	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.3	3.2	4.0	3.1
5: Very strong (%)	5.6	.	22.2	.
4: Strong (%)	38.9	33.3	55.6	25.0
3: Average (%)	44.4	53.3	22.2	62.5
2: Weak (%)	5.6	13.3	.	12.5
1: Very weak (%)	5.6	.	.	.
Total (N)	36	15	9	8

B3a: Grade undergraduate majors' ability to meet prog demands	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.8	4.2	4.4	4.1
A (%)	18.6	36.4	40.0	30.8
B (%)	52.5	50.0	55.0	53.8
C (%)	20.3	13.6	5.0	7.7
D (%)	8.5	.	.	7.7
Total (N)	59	22	20	13

B3b: Grade graduate student ability to meet prog demands	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.9	4.0	4.0	4.0
A (%)	13.3	22.7	15.0	14.3
B (%)	63.3	68.2	70.0	71.4
C (%)	21.7	.	15.0	14.3
D (%)	1.7	9.1	.	.
Total (N)	60	22	20	14

B3c: Grade demonstrated professional ability of faculty	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	4.3	4.6	4.6	4.3
A (%)	45.0	63.6	65.0	40.0
B (%)	45.0	31.8	30.0	53.3
C (%)	8.3	4.5	5.0	6.7
D (%)	1.7	.	.	.
Total (N)	60	22	20	15

B3d: Grade professional achievement of faculty	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	4.3	4.7	4.6	4.5
A (%)	43.3	72.7	55.0	53.3
B (%)	46.7	22.7	45.0	46.7
C (%)	8.3	4.5	.	.
D (%)	1.7	.	.	.
Total (N)	60	22	20	15

B3e: Grade own demonstrated professional ability	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	4.4	4.7	4.5	4.5
A (%)	50.0	72.7	52.6	50.0
B (%)	46.7	27.3	47.4	50.0
C (%)	1.7	.	.	.
F (%)	1.7	.	.	.
Total (N)	60	22	19	14

B3f: Grade own professional achievement	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	4.4	4.7	4.5	4.3
A (%)	46.7	72.7	52.6	35.7
B (%)	48.3	27.3	42.1	57.1
C (%)	3.3	.	5.3	7.1
F (%)	1.7	.	.	.
Total (N)	60	22	19	14

B4: Department's vision for the future	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Clear vision; actively working toward goals (%)	40.0	52.4	60.0	13.3
Vision with slow progress (%)	48.3	42.9	25.0	66.7
No clear vision (%)	10.0	4.8	15.0	13.3
Not familiar (%)	1.7	.	.	6.7
Total (N)	60	21	20	15

B5: Agreement with department vision for future	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.2	3.3	3.4	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	32.1	42.1	47.1	8.3
3: Agree (%)	60.4	47.4	41.2	83.3
2: Disagree (%)	5.7	10.5	11.8	8.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.9	.	.	.
Total (N)	53	19	17	12

B6: College's vision for the future	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Clear vision; actively working toward goals (%)	26.7	22.7	35.0	13.3
Vision with slow progress (%)	25.0	45.5	20.0	13.3
No clear vision (%)	25.0	9.1	5.0	13.3
Not familiar (%)	23.3	22.7	40.0	60.0
Total (N)	60	22	20	15

B7a: Department change in next five years	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Change for the better (%)	40.0	50.0	50.0	46.7
Change for the worse (%)	21.7	31.8	15.0	20.0
Not really change (%)	38.3	18.2	35.0	33.3
Total (N)	60	22	20	15

B7b: College change in next five years	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Change for the better (%)	31.0	31.8	40.0	33.3
Change for the worse (%)	20.7	27.3	.	16.7
Not really change (%)	48.3	40.9	60.0	50.0
Total (N)	58	22	20	12

B7c: NC State change in next five years	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Change for the better (%)	30.5	31.8	50.0	50.0
Change for the worse (%)	18.6	18.2	.	.
Not really change (%)	50.8	50.0	50.0	50.0
Total (N)	59	22	20	12

Back to Top

Section C: Leadership

C1a: Dept admin communication with faculty	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.2	3.1	3.1	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	49.2	28.6	55.0	40.0
3: Good (%)	32.2	57.1	15.0	33.3
2: Fair (%)	11.9	9.5	15.0	6.7
1: Poor (%)	6.8	4.8	15.0	20.0
Total (N)	59	21	20	15

C1b: Dept admin seek faculty input for dept vision	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.2	3.2	3.2	3.1
4: Excellent (%)	44.8	38.1	45.0	46.7
3: Good (%)	34.5	47.6	35.0	26.7
2: Fair (%)	12.1	9.5	15.0	20.0
1: Poor (%)	8.6	4.8	5.0	6.7
Total (N)	58	21	20	15

C1c: Dept admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0	3.1	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	28.8	28.6	40.0	21.4
3: Good (%)	39.0	52.4	30.0	42.9
2: Fair (%)	22.0	14.3	25.0	21.4
1: Poor (%)	10.2	4.8	5.0	14.3
Total (N)	59	21	20	14

C1d: Dept admin delegate dept responsibility to faculty	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	3.3	3.5	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	30.5	40.0	57.9	7.1
3: Good (%)	45.8	45.0	36.8	57.1
2: Fair (%)	18.6	15.0	5.3	21.4
1: Poor (%)	5.1	.	.	14.3
Total (N)	59	20	19	14

C1e: Dept admin grant faculty autonomy	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.2	3.2	3.4	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	40.4	40.0	55.0	26.7
3: Good (%)	40.4	45.0	30.0	46.7
2: Fair (%)	14.0	10.0	15.0	20.0
1: Poor (%)	5.3	5.0	.	6.7
Total (N)	57	20	20	15

C1f: Dept admin set clear and explicit priorities	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9	3.1	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	22.4	14.3	30.0	.
3: Good (%)	46.6	66.7	50.0	73.3
2: Fair (%)	24.1	14.3	15.0	20.0
1: Poor (%)	6.9	4.8	5.0	6.7
Total (N)	58	21	20	15

C1g: Dept admin appreciate your contrib to mission	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9	3.1	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	32.8	25.0	40.0	21.4
3: Good (%)	41.4	55.0	30.0	42.9
2: Fair (%)	15.5	5.0	25.0	21.4
1: Poor (%)	10.3	15.0	5.0	14.3
Total (N)	58	20	20	14

C1h: Dept admin conflict resolution	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.6	3.0	2.1
4: Excellent (%)	25.5	22.2	37.5	.
3: Good (%)	41.2	38.9	37.5	50.0
2: Fair (%)	25.5	16.7	12.5	14.3
1: Poor (%)	7.8	22.2	12.5	35.7
Total (N)	51	18	16	14

C1i: Dept admin provide necessary resources	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.6	2.8	3.1	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	19.0	23.8	35.0	13.3
3: Good (%)	32.8	42.9	35.0	46.7
2: Fair (%)	36.2	19.0	30.0	26.7
1: Poor (%)	12.1	14.3	.	13.3
Total (N)	58	21	20	15

C1j: Dept admin allocate resources fairly	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	2.6	3.2	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	25.0	23.8	31.6	7.7
3: Good (%)	42.9	33.3	57.9	69.2
2: Fair (%)	25.0	23.8	5.3	15.4
1: Poor (%)	7.1	19.0	5.3	7.7
Total (N)	56	21	19	13

C1k: Dept admin serve as advocate for dept to college	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.3	3.1	3.1	3.2
4: Excellent (%)	47.3	40.0	47.1	33.3
3: Good (%)	36.4	35.0	23.5	58.3
2: Fair (%)	10.9	15.0	23.5	.
1: Poor (%)	5.5	10.0	5.9	8.3
Total (N)	55	20	17	12

C1l: Dept admin support academic freedom	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.3	3.5	3.7	3.3
4: Excellent (%)	48.1	50.0	78.9	33.3
3: Good (%)	42.3	45.0	15.8	58.3
2: Fair (%)	5.8	5.0	5.3	8.3
1: Poor (%)	3.8	.	.	.
Total (N)	52	20	19	12

C1m: Dept admin make rational decisions	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0	3.3	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	36.2	23.8	47.4	13.3
3: Good (%)	36.2	57.1	36.8	53.3
2: Fair (%)	22.4	14.3	10.5	20.0
1: Poor (%)	5.2	4.8	5.3	13.3
Total (N)	58	21	19	15

C1n: Dept admin make equitable decisions	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9	3.2	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	35.7	28.6	36.8	7.7
3: Good (%)	32.1	38.1	47.4	69.2
2: Fair (%)	23.2	23.8	10.5	15.4
1: Poor (%)	8.9	9.5	5.3	7.7
Total (N)	56	21	19	13

C1o: Dept admin promote diversity within dept	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.3	3.4	3.6	3.2
4: Excellent (%)	45.5	55.0	65.0	35.7
3: Good (%)	40.0	30.0	30.0	50.0
2: Fair (%)	14.5	10.0	5.0	14.3
1: Poor (%)	.	5.0	.	.
Total (N)	55	20	20	14

C2a: College admin communication with faculty	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.5	2.4	3.3	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	9.1	11.8	42.9	7.7
3: Good (%)	41.8	35.3	42.9	53.8
2: Fair (%)	34.5	35.3	14.3	30.8
1: Poor (%)	14.5	17.6	.	7.7
Total (N)	55	17	14	13

C2b: College admin seek faculty input for vision	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.2	2.1	2.9	2.4
4: Excellent (%)	5.7	11.8	40.0	.
3: Good (%)	32.1	5.9	20.0	55.6
2: Fair (%)	43.4	58.8	30.0	33.3
1: Poor (%)	18.9	23.5	10.0	11.1
Total (N)	53	17	10	9

C2c: College admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.3	2.3	3.0	2.4
4: Excellent (%)	8.3	13.3	50.0	.
3: Good (%)	35.4	20.0	12.5	55.6
2: Fair (%)	37.5	46.7	25.0	33.3
1: Poor (%)	18.8	20.0	12.5	11.1
Total (N)	48	15	8	9

C2d: College admin grant departmental autonomy	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.7	3.3	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	20.8	16.7	53.8	9.1
3: Good (%)	50.9	44.4	30.8	72.7
2: Fair (%)	15.1	27.8	7.7	9.1
1: Poor (%)	13.2	11.1	7.7	9.1
Total (N)	53	18	13	11

C2e: College admin set clear and explicit priorities	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.5	2.5	3.3	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	12.5	16.7	45.5	12.5
3: Good (%)	41.7	27.8	36.4	50.0
2: Fair (%)	31.3	44.4	18.2	25.0
1: Poor (%)	14.6	11.1	.	12.5
Total (N)	48	18	11	8

C2f: College admin appreciate your contrib to mission	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.6	2.5	3.2	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	19.6	12.5	40.0	12.5
3: Good (%)	39.2	43.8	50.0	50.0
2: Fair (%)	23.5	25.0	.	37.5
1: Poor (%)	17.6	18.8	10.0	.
Total (N)	51	16	10	8

C2g: College admin conflict resolution	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.7	2.4	3.5	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	18.8	.	75.0	.
3: Good (%)	46.9	50.0	.	80.0
2: Fair (%)	18.8	37.5	25.0	.
1: Poor (%)	15.6	12.5	.	20.0
Total (N)	32	8	4	5

C2h: College admin provide necessary resources	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.2	2.2	3.0	2.3
4: Excellent (%)	10.7	10.5	29.4	.
3: Good (%)	30.4	31.6	41.2	50.0
2: Fair (%)	30.4	21.1	29.4	33.3
1: Poor (%)	28.6	36.8	.	16.7
Total (N)	56	19	17	12

C2i: College admin allocate resources fairly	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.5	2.1	2.8	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	16.7	11.8	25.0	.
3: Good (%)	35.4	17.6	41.7	77.8
2: Fair (%)	27.1	41.2	25.0	11.1
1: Poor (%)	20.8	29.4	8.3	11.1
Total (N)	48	17	12	9

C2j: College admin serve as advocate for college to univ	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.7	2.8	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	30.8	23.5	30.0	22.2
3: Good (%)	35.9	41.2	40.0	33.3
2: Fair (%)	17.9	17.6	10.0	33.3
1: Poor (%)	15.4	17.6	20.0	11.1
Total (N)	39	17	10	9

C2k: College admin support academic freedom	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	3.3	3.5	3.2
4: Excellent (%)	31.3	47.1	53.8	22.2
3: Good (%)	50.0	35.3	46.2	77.8
2: Fair (%)	12.5	17.6	.	.
1: Poor (%)	6.3	.	.	.
Total (N)	48	17	13	9

C2l: College admin make rational decisions	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9	3.3	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	16.0	13.3	36.4	11.1
3: Good (%)	58.0	60.0	54.5	77.8
2: Fair (%)	20.0	26.7	9.1	.
1: Poor (%)	6.0	.	.	11.1
Total (N)	50	15	11	9

C2m: College admin make equitable decisions	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.4	3.2	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	18.4	14.3	30.0	.
3: Good (%)	51.0	35.7	60.0	87.5
2: Fair (%)	18.4	21.4	10.0	.
1: Poor (%)	12.2	28.6	.	12.5
Total (N)	49	14	10	8

C2n: College admin promote diversity within college	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.4	3.4	3.6	3.2
4: Excellent (%)	54.5	58.8	57.1	27.3
3: Good (%)	36.4	29.4	42.9	63.6
2: Fair (%)	7.3	5.9	.	9.1
1: Poor (%)	1.8	5.9	.	.
Total (N)	55	17	14	11

C3a: Univ admin communication with faculty	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.3	1.9	3.2	2.4
4: Excellent (%)	8.0	5.9	44.4	.
3: Good (%)	24.0	11.8	33.3	45.5
2: Fair (%)	56.0	52.9	22.2	45.5
1: Poor (%)	12.0	29.4	.	9.1
Total (N)	50	17	9	11

C3b: Univ admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.2	1.8	3.4	2.2
4: Excellent (%)	5.6	.	57.1	.
3: Good (%)	22.2	9.1	28.6	33.3
2: Fair (%)	61.1	63.6	14.3	55.6
1: Poor (%)	11.1	27.3	.	11.1
Total (N)	36	11	7	9

C3c: Univ admin set clear and explicit priorities	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.4	2.2	3.3	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	7.0	.	50.0	18.2
3: Good (%)	34.9	37.5	37.5	36.4
2: Fair (%)	48.8	43.8	.	36.4
1: Poor (%)	9.3	18.8	12.5	9.1
Total (N)	43	16	8	11

C3d: Univ admin serves as advocate for univ to constituents	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.7	2.5	3.1	3.1
4: Excellent (%)	14.6	15.4	42.9	14.3
3: Good (%)	48.8	46.2	28.6	85.7
2: Fair (%)	26.8	15.4	28.6	.
1: Poor (%)	9.8	23.1	.	.
Total (N)	41	13	7	7

C3e: Univ admin support academic freedom	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	3.1	3.5	3.2
4: Excellent (%)	28.3	37.5	63.6	20.0
3: Good (%)	47.8	37.5	27.3	80.0
2: Fair (%)	17.4	18.8	9.1	.
1: Poor (%)	6.5	6.3	.	.
Total (N)	46	16	11	10

C3f: Univ admin make rational decisions	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.5	2.7	3.1	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	11.9	6.7	33.3	.
3: Good (%)	38.1	60.0	44.4	87.5
2: Fair (%)	38.1	26.7	22.2	12.5
1: Poor (%)	11.9	6.7	.	.
Total (N)	42	15	9	8

C3g: Univ admin make equitable decisions	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.3	2.4	3.0	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	12.2	7.7	33.3	.
3: Good (%)	34.1	46.2	44.4	66.7
2: Fair (%)	29.3	23.1	11.1	22.2
1: Poor (%)	24.4	23.1	11.1	11.1
Total (N)	41	13	9	9

C3h: Univ admin promote diversity within university	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	3.3	3.3	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	32.7	35.7	36.4	9.1
3: Good (%)	46.9	57.1	54.5	81.8
2: Fair (%)	18.4	7.1	9.1	9.1
1: Poor (%)	2.0	.	.	.
Total (N)	49	14	11	11

Back to Top

Section D: Faculty-Administration Relationships

D1a: I am encouraged to give input on curricular issues	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.3	3.4	3.5	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	47.5	47.6	50.0	46.7
3: Agree (%)	42.4	47.6	45.0	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	6.8	4.8	5.0	13.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.4	.	.	.
Total (N)	59	21	20	15

D1b: I am encouraged to give input on prog assessment	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.2	3.1	3.2	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	33.9	25.0	30.0	33.3
3: Agree (%)	54.2	60.0	60.0	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	10.2	10.0	10.0	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.7	5.0	.	.
Total (N)	59	20	20	15

D1c: I am encouraged to give input on dept hiring	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.3	3.2	3.2	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	51.7	38.1	40.0	13.3
3: Agree (%)	36.2	47.6	35.0	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	6.9	9.5	25.0	26.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.2	4.8	.	.
Total (N)	58	21	20	15

D1d: I am encouraged to give input on college admin appointments	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.4	2.5	2.5	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.5	9.5	15.8	7.1
3: Agree (%)	33.3	38.1	26.3	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	38.6	42.9	52.6	35.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	17.5	9.5	5.3	7.1
Total (N)	57	21	19	14

D1e: I am encouraged to give input on university admin appointments	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.3	2.3	2.4	2.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	7.0	4.8	11.1	.
3: Agree (%)	38.6	38.1	33.3	21.4
2: Disagree (%)	35.1	42.9	44.4	64.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	19.3	14.3	11.1	14.3
Total (N)	57	21	18	14

D2: Familiarity with academic program assessment in dept	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.2	3.0	2.6	2.7
4: Very familiar (%)	36.2	33.3	20.0	20.0
3: Somewhat familiar (%)	51.7	38.1	35.0	33.3
2: Not very familiar (%)	5.2	23.8	30.0	40.0
1: Not at all familiar (%)	6.9	4.8	15.0	6.7
Total (N)	58	21	20	15

D3a: Understanding of resource allocation to university	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.4	2.3	2.4	2.0
4: Very well (%)	6.9	5.0	5.3	6.7
3: Fairly well (%)	41.4	30.0	42.1	20.0
2: Not very well (%)	41.4	50.0	36.8	40.0
1: Not at all (%)	10.3	15.0	15.8	33.3
Total (N)	58	20	19	15

D3b: Understanding of resource allocation to college	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.3	2.2	2.2	2.0
4: Very well (%)	5.2	5.0	5.3	.
3: Fairly well (%)	32.8	20.0	26.3	26.7
2: Not very well (%)	53.4	65.0	52.6	46.7
1: Not at all (%)	8.6	10.0	15.8	26.7
Total (N)	58	20	19	15

D3c: Understanding of resource allocation to department	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.6	2.6	2.4	2.3
4: Very well (%)	12.1	10.0	5.0	6.7
3: Fairly well (%)	43.1	45.0	40.0	26.7
2: Not very well (%)	34.5	35.0	45.0	60.0
1: Not at all (%)	10.3	10.0	10.0	6.7
Total (N)	58	20	20	15

D3d: Understanding of resource allocation within department	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9	2.7	2.7
4: Very well (%)	22.0	28.6	5.0	20.0
3: Fairly well (%)	49.2	38.1	60.0	40.0
2: Not very well (%)	22.0	28.6	30.0	26.7
1: Not at all (%)	6.8	4.8	5.0	13.3
Total (N)	59	21	20	15

D4: Faculty have sufficient input on dept resource allocation	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.7	2.7	3.1	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	13.6	4.8	15.8	.
3: Agree (%)	45.8	61.9	73.7	71.4
2: Disagree (%)	33.9	33.3	10.5	21.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.8	.	.	7.1
Total (N)	59	21	19	14

D5: Dept faculty searches/appointments are collegial and inclusive	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.3	3.3	3.3	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	42.4	52.4	55.0	21.4
3: Agree (%)	47.5	28.6	25.0	57.1
2: Disagree (%)	8.5	14.3	10.0	21.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.7	4.8	10.0	.
Total (N)	59	21	20	14

D6a: Relations between faculty in dept and dept admin	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.3	3.4	3.2	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	44.1	57.1	47.4	14.3
3: Good (%)	42.4	33.3	31.6	57.1
2: Fair (%)	8.5	4.8	15.8	7.1
1: Poor (%)	5.1	4.8	5.3	21.4
Total (N)	59	21	19	14

D6b: Relations between faculty in dept and college admin	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.7	2.8	2.9	2.4
4: Excellent (%)	19.2	10.5	25.0	14.3
3: Good (%)	46.2	63.2	50.0	42.9
2: Fair (%)	21.2	21.1	18.8	14.3
1: Poor (%)	13.5	5.3	6.3	28.6
Total (N)	52	19	16	14

D6c: Relations between faculty in dept and univ admin	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.4	2.4	3.1	2.3
4: Excellent (%)	5.3	.	27.3	8.3
3: Good (%)	44.7	53.3	54.5	33.3
2: Fair (%)	39.5	33.3	18.2	33.3
1: Poor (%)	10.5	13.3	.	25.0
Total (N)	38	15	11	12

D6d: Relations between all faculty and univ admin	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.4	2.3	3.2	2.5
4: Excellent (%)	5.4	.	30.0	9.1
3: Good (%)	43.2	46.7	60.0	45.5
2: Fair (%)	40.5	33.3	10.0	36.4
1: Poor (%)	10.8	20.0	.	9.1
Total (N)	37	15	10	11

D7a: Faculty Senate effective commun between faculty and univ admin	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.5	2.5	3.2	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	5.3	.	20.0	12.5
3: Agree (%)	57.9	53.8	80.0	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	18.4	38.5	.	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	18.4	7.7	.	12.5
Total (N)	38	13	5	8

D7b: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty in general	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.4	2.4	3.4	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	.	40.0	14.3
3: Agree (%)	63.9	41.7	60.0	42.9
2: Disagree (%)	16.7	58.3	.	42.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	19.4	.	.	.
Total (N)	36	12	5	7

D7c: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty like me	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.3	2.1	3.5	1.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	.	50.0	.
3: Agree (%)	51.4	21.4	50.0	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	31.4	71.4	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	17.1	7.1	.	66.7
Total (N)	35	14	4	6

D8: Effectiveness of university grievance procedures	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	2.7	3.5	2.7
4: Very effective (%)	16.7	15.4	50.0	.
3: Somewhat effective (%)	72.2	53.8	50.0	66.7
2: Not very effective (%)	5.6	15.4	.	33.3
1: Not at all effective (%)	5.6	15.4	.	.
Total (N)	18	13	2	3

D9: Importance of "ombuds" for informal conflict resolution	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.2	3.2	3.6	3.4
4: Very important (%)	39.3	36.8	65.0	50.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	42.9	42.1	25.0	42.9
2: Not very important (%)	12.5	21.1	10.0	7.1
1: Not at all important (%)	5.4	.	.	.
Total (N)	56	19	20	14

Back to Top

Section E: Diversity/Multiculturalism

E1: Importance of institutional emphasis on diversity/Multiculturalism	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	3.1	3.6	3.6
4: Very important (%)	38.6	42.9	57.9	71.4
3: Somewhat important (%)	43.9	38.1	42.1	14.3
2: Not very important (%)	8.8	9.5	.	14.3
1: Not at all important (%)	8.8	9.5	.	.
Total (N)	57	21	19	14

E2: Importance of diversity to enhanced learning in own classroom	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.5	2.7	3.1	2.8
4: Very important (%)	15.8	19.0	30.0	16.7
3: Somewhat important (%)	31.6	52.4	45.0	58.3
2: Not very important (%)	40.4	9.5	25.0	16.7
1: Not at all important (%)	12.3	19.0	.	8.3
Total (N)	57	21	20	12

E3: NCSU prepares students to live and work in diverse society	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	3.1	3.1	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.2	21.1	17.6	8.3
3: Agree (%)	71.4	68.4	70.6	91.7
2: Disagree (%)	18.4	10.5	11.8	.
Total (N)	49	19	17	12

E4a: My dept recruits historically underrepresented students	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.4	3.4	3.5	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	50.0	40.0	55.6	50.0
3: Agree (%)	41.1	60.0	38.9	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	7.1	.	5.6	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.8	.	.	.
Total (N)	56	20	18	10

E4b: My dept retains historically underrepresented students	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.3	3.3	3.4	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	44.2	33.3	47.1	36.4
3: Agree (%)	44.2	66.7	47.1	63.6
2: Disagree (%)	9.6	.	5.9	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.9	.	.	.
Total (N)	52	18	17	11

E4c: My dept supports historically underrepresented students	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.4	3.2	3.3	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	48.0	33.3	40.0	40.0
3: Agree (%)	42.0	55.6	46.7	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	8.0	11.1	13.3	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.0	.	.	.
Total (N)	50	18	15	10

E4d: My dept recruits historically underrepresented faculty	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.3	3.2	3.5	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	41.8	25.0	50.0	46.2
3: Agree (%)	50.9	65.0	50.0	46.2
2: Disagree (%)	5.5	10.0	.	7.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.8	.	.	.
Total (N)	55	20	18	13

E4e: My dept retains historically underrepresented faculty	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.4	3.1	3.5	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	45.5	17.6	53.3	40.0
3: Agree (%)	50.0	76.5	40.0	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	4.5	5.9	6.7	10.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	.	10.0
Total (N)	44	17	15	10

E4f: My dept supports historically underrepresented faculty	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.3	3.1	3.5	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	43.2	22.2	61.5	30.0
3: Agree (%)	47.7	66.7	30.8	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	9.1	11.1	7.7	10.0
Total (N)	44	18	13	10

E5a: Dept environ accepting/respectful of age	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.3	3.2	3.7	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	38.5	40.0	75.0	58.3
3: Agree (%)	53.8	45.0	20.0	41.7
2: Disagree (%)	1.9	10.0	5.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.8	5.0	.	.
Total (N)	52	20	20	12

E5b: Dept environ accepting/respectful of disability status	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.3	3.5	3.8	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	37.1	50.0	84.6	71.4
3: Agree (%)	60.0	50.0	15.4	28.6
2: Disagree (%)	2.9	.	.	.
Total (N)	35	12	13	7

E5c: Dept environ accepting/respectful of gender	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.4	3.4	3.7	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	40.4	40.0	75.0	50.0
3: Agree (%)	55.8	55.0	15.0	25.0
2: Disagree (%)	3.8	5.0	10.0	25.0
Total (N)	52	20	20	12

E5d: Dept environ accepting/respectful of military status	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.4	3.4	3.9	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	44.8	58.3	90.0	25.0
3: Agree (%)	55.2	33.3	10.0	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	8.3	.	25.0
Total (N)	29	12	10	4

E5e: Dept environ accepting/respectful of nationality/ethnic origin	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.4	3.4	3.8	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	44.2	45.0	80.0	72.7
3: Agree (%)	53.8	50.0	20.0	27.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.9	5.0	.	.
Total (N)	52	20	20	11

E5f: Dept environ accepting/respectful of race and color	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.4	3.4	3.8	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	44.2	47.1	78.9	63.6
3: Agree (%)	53.8	47.1	21.1	36.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.9	5.9	.	.
Total (N)	52	17	19	11

E5g: Dept environ accepting/respectful of religion	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.5	3.3	3.7	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	46.3	46.7	73.3	62.5
3: Agree (%)	53.7	46.7	26.7	37.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	6.7	.	.
Total (N)	41	15	15	8

E5h: Dept environ accepting/respectful of sexual orientation	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.3	3.3	3.8	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	40.7	54.5	80.0	60.0
3: Agree (%)	51.9	27.3	20.0	20.0
2: Disagree (%)	3.7	9.1	.	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.7	9.1	.	.
Total (N)	27	11	10	5

E6a: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of age	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.5	3.3	3.8	3.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	54.0	50.0	77.8	76.9
3: Agree (%)	46.0	40.0	22.2	23.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	10.0	.	.
Total (N)	50	20	18	13

E6b: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of disability status	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.5	3.4	3.8	3.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	50.0	47.1	83.3	87.5
3: Agree (%)	50.0	47.1	16.7	12.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	5.9	.	.
Total (N)	36	17	18	8

E6c: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of gender	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.5	3.4	3.8	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	51.0	50.0	77.8	69.2
3: Agree (%)	49.0	45.0	22.2	30.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	5.0	.	.
Total (N)	49	20	18	13

E6d: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of military status	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.5	3.4	3.9	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	51.6	50.0	85.7	57.1
3: Agree (%)	48.4	42.9	14.3	28.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	7.1	.	14.3
Total (N)	31	14	14	7

E6e: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of national/ethnic origin	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.5	3.3	3.8	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	53.1	45.0	83.3	69.2
3: Agree (%)	46.9	45.0	16.7	30.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	10.0	.	.
Total (N)	49	20	18	13

E6f: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of race and color	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.5	3.2	3.8	3.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	52.1	44.4	83.3	75.0
3: Agree (%)	47.9	44.4	16.7	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	11.1	.	.
Total (N)	48	18	18	12

E6g: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of religion	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.5	3.3	3.8	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	53.3	43.8	82.4	70.0
3: Agree (%)	46.7	50.0	17.6	30.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	6.3	.	.
Total (N)	45	16	17	10

E6h: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of sexual orientation	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.5	3.2	3.7	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	53.3	53.8	73.3	77.8
3: Agree (%)	43.3	23.1	20.0	11.1
2: Disagree (%)	3.3	7.7	6.7	11.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	15.4	.	.
Total (N)	30	13	15	9

E7: Faculty diversity/multiculturalism enhancement of intellectual diversity in dept	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.4	2.5	3.2	3.2
4: A great deal (%)	14.3	10.0	45.0	16.7
3: Some (%)	42.9	55.0	30.0	83.3
2: A little (%)	14.3	10.0	20.0	.
1: Not at all (%)	28.6	25.0	5.0	.
Total (N)	56	20	20	12

E8: Inclusion of diversity-related topics, scholarship, etc in your courses	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	1.6	1.6	2.3	2.1
4: A great deal (%)	.	6.3	15.8	.
3: Some (%)	17.0	12.5	31.6	40.0
2: A little (%)	30.2	18.8	15.8	30.0
1: Not at all (%)	52.8	62.5	36.8	30.0
Total (N)	53	16	19	10

E9a: Interest in research, extension, art endeavors outside U.S.	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	2.9	3.3	3.2
4: A great deal (%)	45.6	35.0	55.0	50.0
3: Some (%)	31.6	35.0	25.0	35.7
2: A little (%)	10.5	10.0	10.0	.
1: None (%)	12.3	20.0	10.0	14.3
Total (N)	57	20	20	14

E9b: Interest in teaching study abroad	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.2	2.5	2.8	2.6
4: A great deal (%)	17.5	20.0	30.0	42.9
3: Some (%)	26.3	30.0	35.0	14.3
2: A little (%)	15.8	25.0	20.0	7.1
1: None (%)	40.4	25.0	15.0	35.7
Total (N)	57	20	20	14

E9c: Interest in participating in spring break service learning	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	1.4	1.4	2.1	1.7
4: A great deal (%)	1.8	.	15.8	14.3
3: Some (%)	10.5	5.3	26.3	7.1
2: A little (%)	17.5	26.3	5.3	14.3
1: None (%)	70.2	68.4	52.6	64.3
Total (N)	57	19	19	14

E9d: Interest in participating in international service projects	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.0	2.2	2.6	2.3
4: A great deal (%)	9.1	15.0	21.1	28.6
3: Some (%)	23.6	30.0	36.8	14.3
2: A little (%)	21.8	15.0	26.3	14.3
1: None (%)	45.5	40.0	15.8	42.9
Total (N)	55	20	19	14

E9e: Interest in teaching in international studies major	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	1.5	1.6	2.1	1.6
4: A great deal (%)	.	5.3	10.5	7.1
3: Some (%)	15.8	15.8	26.3	14.3
2: A little (%)	17.5	10.5	21.1	7.1
1: None (%)	66.7	68.4	42.1	71.4
Total (N)	57	19	19	14

E9f: Interest in advising international students	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.7	2.7	2.7	2.8
4: A great deal (%)	15.8	35.0	21.1	28.6
3: Some (%)	52.6	30.0	36.8	35.7
2: A little (%)	15.8	5.0	31.6	21.4
1: None (%)	15.8	30.0	10.5	14.3
Total (N)	57	20	19	14

Back to Top

Section F: Working Relationships

F1: There is unity/cohesion among faculty in my department	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8	2.9	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	22.8	15.0	30.0	.
3: Agree (%)	49.1	50.0	30.0	53.8
2: Disagree (%)	22.8	30.0	35.0	38.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.3	5.0	5.0	7.7
Total (N)	57	20	20	13

F2a: Good communication between my students and me	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.6	3.5	3.5	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	56.1	52.6	50.0	61.5
3: Agree (%)	43.9	47.4	50.0	38.5
Total (N)	57	19	20	13

F2b: Good communication between dept and our students	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.2	3.3	3.2	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.5	30.0	26.3	9.1
3: Agree (%)	69.1	65.0	68.4	90.9
2: Disagree (%)	5.5	5.0	5.3	.
Total (N)	55	20	19	11

F2c: Good communication between faculty in my dept	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	2.8	3.0	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	24.6	10.0	30.0	7.7
3: Agree (%)	57.9	65.0	40.0	76.9
2: Disagree (%)	14.0	20.0	30.0	15.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.5	5.0	.	.
Total (N)	57	20	20	13

F2d: Good communication between my dept and other depts	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.7	2.2	2.9	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	9.1	.	8.3	.
3: Agree (%)	56.8	38.5	75.0	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	27.3	46.2	16.7	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.8	15.4	.	.
Total (N)	44	13	12	12

F2e: Good communication between my college and other colleges	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.0	2.9	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	9.4	.	16.7	.
3: Agree (%)	62.5	30.0	58.3	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	21.9	40.0	25.0	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.3	30.0	.	.
Total (N)	32	10	12	6

F3: Dept environ promotes respectful dialogue between diverse perspectives	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.2	3.2	3.4	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	35.1	38.9	47.4	15.4
3: Agree (%)	54.4	50.0	47.4	76.9
2: Disagree (%)	10.5	5.6	.	7.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	5.6	5.3	.
Total (N)	57	18	19	13

F4a: Frequency given/recvd teaching advice in dept past few years	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	2.9	3.1	3.4
Frequently (%)	31.6	23.8	35.0	61.5
Sometimes (%)	56.1	57.1	45.0	23.1
Seldom (%)	5.3	4.8	15.0	7.7
Never (%)	7.0	14.3	5.0	7.7
Total (N)	57	21	20	13

F4b: Frequency given/recvd research/artistic feedback in dept past few yrs	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	2.8	3.2	2.7
Frequently (%)	37.5	19.0	42.1	23.1
Sometimes (%)	42.9	47.6	36.8	38.5
Seldom (%)	10.7	23.8	15.8	23.1
Never (%)	8.9	9.5	5.3	15.4
Total (N)	56	21	19	13

F4c: Frequency given/recvd help with dept/college bureaucracy past few yrs	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0	3.1	2.9
Frequently (%)	29.8	23.8	25.0	30.8
Sometimes (%)	38.6	47.6	60.0	46.2
Seldom (%)	28.1	28.6	15.0	7.7
Never (%)	3.5	.	.	15.4
Total (N)	57	21	20	13

F4d: Frequency given/recvd help undrsnd reappointment, promotion, tenure past few yrs	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0	3.3	2.2
Frequently (%)	26.3	23.8	35.0	.
Sometimes (%)	52.6	57.1	60.0	46.2
Seldom (%)	19.3	9.5	.	23.1
Never (%)	1.8	9.5	5.0	30.8
Total (N)	57	21	20	13

F4e: Frequency given/recvd help with work/personal balance issues past few yrs	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.1	2.1	2.3	2.0
Frequently (%)	14.0	9.5	5.0	15.4
Sometimes (%)	21.1	28.6	50.0	7.7
Seldom (%)	29.8	23.8	15.0	38.5
Never (%)	35.1	38.1	30.0	38.5
Total (N)	57	21	20	13

F5a: Frequency of collab with faculty in your dept	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.4	3.2	3.6	3.5
Frequently (%)	52.6	50.0	60.0	69.2
Sometimes (%)	35.1	30.0	35.0	15.4
Seldom (%)	7.0	10.0	5.0	7.7
Never (%)	5.3	10.0	.	7.7
Total (N)	57	20	20	13

F5b: Frequency of collab with faculty in other NCSU depts	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.7	2.5	3.3	2.5
Frequently (%)	28.1	30.0	60.0	15.4
Sometimes (%)	33.3	20.0	15.0	38.5
Seldom (%)	15.8	20.0	15.0	23.1
Never (%)	22.8	30.0	10.0	23.1
Total (N)	57	20	20	13

F5c: Frequency of collab with faculty from other universities	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.5	3.1	3.9	2.5
Frequently (%)	64.9	45.0	85.0	30.8
Sometimes (%)	24.6	35.0	15.0	23.1
Seldom (%)	7.0	5.0	.	15.4
Never (%)	3.5	15.0	.	30.8
Total (N)	57	20	20	13

F5d: Frequency of collab with non-faculty external to NCSU	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.5	2.7	2.2	2.1
Frequently (%)	22.8	35.0	10.0	15.4
Sometimes (%)	28.1	25.0	25.0	15.4
Seldom (%)	22.8	10.0	35.0	30.8
Never (%)	26.3	30.0	30.0	38.5
Total (N)	57	20	20	13

Back to Top

Section G: Faculty Support & Professional Development

G1a: Satisfaction with level of courses	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.4	3.3	3.3	3.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	53.4	50.0	36.8	58.3
3: Satisfied (%)	39.7	33.3	57.9	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	3.4	11.1	5.3	8.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	3.4	5.6	.	.
Total (N)	58	18	19	12

G1b: Satisfaction with number of courses	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	3.2	3.2	3.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	36.8	33.3	31.6	50.0
3: Satisfied (%)	43.9	50.0	57.9	41.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	15.8	16.7	10.5	8.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	3.5	.	.	.
Total (N)	57	18	19	12

G1c: Satisfaction with choice in courses	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.5	3.2	3.2	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	53.4	55.6	26.3	54.5
3: Satisfied (%)	43.1	27.8	68.4	27.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	3.4	.	5.3	9.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	16.7	.	9.1
Total (N)	58	18	19	11

G1d: Satisfaction with course content discretion	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.5	3.6	3.5	3.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	58.6	61.1	52.6	81.8
3: Satisfied (%)	36.2	38.9	47.4	18.2
2: Dissatisfied (%)	5.2	.	.	.
Total (N)	58	18	19	11

G1e: Satisfaction with number of students	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	3.3	3.2	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	31.0	38.9	26.3	33.3
3: Satisfied (%)	55.2	50.0	68.4	25.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	8.6	11.1	5.3	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.2	.	.	8.3
Total (N)	58	18	19	12

G1f: Satisfaction with quality of undergraduates	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.6	2.7	3.2	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	9.6	10.5	26.3	25.0
3: Satisfied (%)	51.9	57.9	63.2	58.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	28.8	26.3	10.5	16.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	9.6	5.3	.	.
Total (N)	52	19	19	12

G1g: Satisfaction with quality of graduate students	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9	3.2	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	13.8	11.1	31.6	10.0
3: Satisfied (%)	60.3	72.2	57.9	90.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	24.1	16.7	10.5	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	1.7	.	.	.
Total (N)	58	18	19	10

G1h: Satisfaction with access to grad TAs	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8	3.1	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	20.4	11.1	21.1	18.2
3: Satisfied (%)	53.7	66.7	68.4	45.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	18.5	11.1	10.5	18.2
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	7.4	11.1	.	18.2
Total (N)	54	18	19	11

G1i: Satisfaction with access to grad RAs	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	2.8	2.9	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	24.5	14.3	18.8	.
3: Satisfied (%)	55.1	64.3	62.5	83.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	18.4	7.1	12.5	16.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.0	14.3	6.3	.
Total (N)	49	14	16	6

G2a: NCSU supports innovative teaching	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	2.9	3.3	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.5	22.2	38.9	36.4
3: Agree (%)	61.8	50.0	55.6	54.5
2: Disagree (%)	9.1	27.8	5.6	9.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.6	.	.	.
Total (N)	55	18	18	11

G2b: NCSU supports innovative research and scholarly activity	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	3.2	3.5	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	28.3	33.3	56.3	30.0
3: Agree (%)	56.6	50.0	37.5	70.0
2: Disagree (%)	15.1	16.7	6.3	.
Total (N)	53	18	16	10

G2c: NCSU supports innovative creative artistry and literature	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	2.0	3.7	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	18.2	25.0	66.7	50.0
3: Agree (%)	54.5	.	33.3	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	27.3	25.0	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	50.0	.	.
Total (N)	11	4	3	2

G2d: NCSU supports innovative extension/engagement/econ dev activity	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	2.8	3.3	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	20.7	18.2	25.0	.
3: Agree (%)	69.0	45.5	75.0	80.0
2: Disagree (%)	10.3	36.4	.	20.0
Total (N)	29	11	4	5

G3a: NCSU rewards innovative teaching	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.7	2.5	2.8	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	12.7	21.1	18.8	.
3: Agree (%)	50.9	31.6	50.0	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	30.9	26.3	25.0	60.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.5	21.1	6.3	.
Total (N)	55	19	16	10

G3b: NCSU rewards innovative research and scholarly activity	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	3.2	3.3	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	31.6	42.1	40.0	30.0
3: Agree (%)	43.9	36.8	53.3	70.0
2: Disagree (%)	19.3	21.1	6.7	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.3	.	.	.
Total (N)	57	19	15	10

G3c: NCSU rewards innovative creative artistry and literature	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	2.3	3.7	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	11.1	25.0	66.7	.
3: Agree (%)	66.7	.	33.3	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	22.2	50.0	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	25.0	.	.
Total (N)	9	4	3	2

G3d: NCSU rewards innovative extension/engagement/econ dev activity	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.5	3.2	2.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	20.0	40.0	.
3: Agree (%)	84.0	30.0	40.0	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	12.0	30.0	20.0	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.0	20.0	.	16.7
Total (N)	25	10	5	6

G4a: Satisfaction: Availability of classroom technology	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9	3.2	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	19.3	21.1	42.1	33.3
3: Satisfied (%)	54.4	52.6	42.1	41.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	14.0	21.1	10.5	16.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	12.3	5.3	5.3	8.3
Total (N)	57	19	19	12

G4b: Satisfaction: Teaching reduction for scholarly/prof growth	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.6	2.3	3.0	2.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	11.1	6.3	42.9	.
3: Satisfied (%)	53.7	31.3	21.4	44.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	20.4	50.0	28.6	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	14.8	12.5	7.1	22.2
Total (N)	54	16	14	9

G4c: Satisfaction: Teaching workshop/seminar opportunities	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	3.2	3.3	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	14.9	21.1	29.4	.
3: Satisfied (%)	83.0	78.9	70.6	72.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	.	.	27.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.1	.	.	.
Total (N)	47	19	17	11

G4d: Satisfaction: Avail of funds to attend teaching conference/wrkshp	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.6	2.7	3.3	1.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	8.1	7.7	37.5	.
3: Satisfied (%)	56.8	61.5	50.0	20.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	21.6	23.1	12.5	30.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	13.5	7.7	.	50.0
Total (N)	37	13	8	10

G4e: Satisfaction: Learning technology training/support	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9	3.3	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	10.2	12.5	26.7	36.4
3: Satisfied (%)	69.4	68.8	73.3	45.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	14.3	12.5	.	18.2
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.1	6.3	.	.
Total (N)	49	16	15	11

G4f: Satisfaction: Campus bookstore meeting course needs	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.2	3.1	3.0	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	20.4	17.6	20.0	20.0
3: Satisfied (%)	75.5	76.5	60.0	70.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	4.1	5.9	20.0	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	.	.	10.0
Total (N)	49	17	15	10

G4g: Satisfaction: Availability of funds to present work	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.4	2.6	3.2	1.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	12.0	5.6	26.7	.
3: Satisfied (%)	36.0	55.6	66.7	27.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	32.0	33.3	6.7	36.4
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	20.0	5.6	.	36.4
Total (N)	50	18	15	11

G4h: Satisfaction: Opportunities for scholarly/professional leave	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.6	2.5	2.7	2.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	14.8	6.3	8.3	.
3: Satisfied (%)	48.1	62.5	50.0	37.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	22.2	6.3	41.7	37.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	14.8	25.0	.	25.0
Total (N)	54	16	12	8

G4i: Satisfaction: Financial support for scholarly/professional leave	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.5	2.4	2.8	1.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	15.7	6.7	8.3	.
3: Satisfied (%)	37.3	46.7	58.3	28.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	31.4	26.7	33.3	28.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	15.7	20.0	.	42.9
Total (N)	51	15	12	7

G4j: Satisfaction: Leadership development opportunities	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.6	2.5	3.0	2.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	8.8	.	16.7	.
3: Satisfied (%)	58.8	72.7	66.7	42.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	20.6	9.1	16.7	57.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	11.8	18.2	.	.
Total (N)	34	11	6	7

G4k: Satisfaction: Support for dept assessment activities	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.7	3.1	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	12.8	6.7	25.0	.
3: Satisfied (%)	61.5	66.7	62.5	62.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	15.4	13.3	12.5	37.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	10.3	13.3	.	.
Total (N)	39	15	8	8

G4l: Satisfaction: Availability of/access to materials via NCSU Libraries	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.4	3.4	3.2	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	42.9	44.4	26.3	27.3
3: Satisfied (%)	53.6	50.0	68.4	72.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	3.6	5.6	5.3	.
Total (N)	56	18	19	11

G4m: Satisfaction: Support with dealing with student concerns	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	2.8	3.2	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	22.7	5.9	23.5	18.2
3: Satisfied (%)	68.2	76.5	70.6	63.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	6.8	11.8	5.9	18.2
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.3	5.9	.	.
Total (N)	44	17	17	11

G4n: Satisfaction: Support for technology transfer	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.7	2.7	2.9	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	12.5	9.1	25.0	.
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	63.6	50.0	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	28.1	18.2	12.5	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	9.4	9.1	12.5	.
Total (N)	32	11	8	6

G5: Assignment of formal mentor	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Yes (%)	3.4	45.0	72.2	25.0
No (%)	96.6	55.0	22.2	66.7
Don't know (%)	.	.	5.6	8.3
Total (N)	58	20	18	12

G6: Mentor helpfulness	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.5	2.9	3.2	3.0
4: Very helpful (%)	50.0	22.2	61.5	66.7
3: Somewhat helpful (%)	50.0	44.4	7.7	.
2: Not very helpful (%)	.	33.3	23.1	.
1: Not at all helpful (%)	.	.	7.7	33.3
Total (N)	2	9	13	3

G7a: Satisfaction: Pre-award support from college for grant/contract	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9	3.5	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	28.3	23.5	46.7	.
3: Satisfied (%)	52.8	58.8	53.3	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	11.3	5.9	.	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	7.5	11.8	.	.
Total (N)	53	17	15	4

G7b: Satisfaction: Post-award support from college for grant/contract	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.6	3.0	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	17.0	11.8	7.7	.
3: Satisfied (%)	54.7	52.9	84.6	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	15.1	17.6	7.7	50.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	13.2	17.6	.	.
Total (N)	53	17	13	4

G7c: Satisfaction: Pre-award University support for grant/contract	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.6	3.4	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	13.6	5.9	40.0	.
3: Satisfied (%)	59.1	58.8	60.0	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	20.5	29.4	.	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.8	5.9	.	.
Total (N)	44	17	5	3

G7d: Satisfaction: Post-award University support for grant/contract	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.6	2.5	2.8	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	8.9	6.7	12.5	.
3: Satisfied (%)	53.3	46.7	50.0	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	22.2	33.3	37.5	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	15.6	13.3	.	.
Total (N)	45	15	8	3

G7e: Satisfaction: Allocation of indirect grant costs to investigator	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	1.6	2.0	2.0	2.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	2.0	6.3	9.1	.
3: Satisfied (%)	18.4	31.3	27.3	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	16.3	18.8	18.2	25.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	63.3	43.8	45.5	25.0
Total (N)	49	16	11	4

G7f: Satisfaction: Allocation of indirect grant costs to department	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	1.6	1.9	1.4	2.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	7.7	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	18.8	23.1	12.5	40.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	27.1	23.1	12.5	40.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	54.2	46.2	75.0	20.0
Total (N)	48	13	8	5

G7g: Satisfaction: PI control over indirect cost allocation	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	1.5	2.2	1.7	2.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	2.0	12.5	11.1	.
3: Satisfied (%)	15.7	25.0	11.1	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	17.6	31.3	11.1	25.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	64.7	31.3	66.7	25.0
Total (N)	51	16	9	4

Back to Top

Section H: Performance Review, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure

H1: Faculty performance review standards are clearly stated	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.2	3.1	3.1	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	32.8	21.1	33.3	7.7
3: Agree (%)	56.9	63.2	44.4	46.2
2: Disagree (%)	10.3	15.8	22.2	30.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	.	15.4
Total (N)	58	19	18	13

H2: Faculty performance review procedures are clearly stated	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.3	3.2	3.2	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	37.9	26.3	33.3	15.4
3: Agree (%)	58.6	68.4	50.0	46.2
2: Disagree (%)	1.7	5.3	16.7	23.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.7	.	.	15.4
Total (N)	58	19	18	13

H3: SME is consistent with departmental vision	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.3	3.2	3.3	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	37.5	25.0	29.4	16.7
3: Agree (%)	58.3	68.8	70.6	83.3
2: Disagree (%)	2.1	6.3	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.1	.	.	.
Total (N)	48	16	17	6

H4: SME is consistent with departmental promotion standards	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.3	3.2	3.3	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	39.1	28.6	29.4	50.0
3: Agree (%)	58.7	64.3	70.6	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	7.1	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.2	.	.	.
Total (N)	46	14	17	4

H5a: Performance Review feedback appropriately based on SME	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.2	3.0	3.3	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	24.3	21.4	41.2	33.3
3: Agree (%)	67.6	64.3	47.1	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	8.1	7.1	11.8	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	7.1	.	.
Total (N)	37	14	17	6

H5b: Performance Review feedback helpful for professional Development	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8	3.0	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	11.4	20.0	23.5	25.0
3: Agree (%)	59.1	46.7	52.9	37.5
2: Disagree (%)	27.3	26.7	23.5	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.3	6.7	.	12.5
Total (N)	44	15	17	8

H5c: Performance Review feedback corresponds with my perceptions of own performance	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9	3.2	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	23.9	20.0	29.4	37.5
3: Agree (%)	58.7	60.0	64.7	37.5
2: Disagree (%)	15.2	13.3	5.9	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.2	6.7	.	25.0
Total (N)	46	15	17	8

H5d: Performance Review feedback helps understand relation to other faculty	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.7	2.9	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	13.3	13.3	17.6	12.5
3: Agree (%)	55.6	46.7	52.9	12.5
2: Disagree (%)	24.4	40.0	29.4	37.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.7	.	.	37.5
Total (N)	45	15	17	8

H5e: Feedback given appropriate weight in merit raises	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.7	3.2	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	11.4	13.3	25.0	25.0
3: Agree (%)	65.9	53.3	68.8	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	13.6	26.7	6.3	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.1	6.7	.	.
Total (N)	44	15	16	8

H6: Understanding of current Academic Tenure Policy	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	2.6	2.9	1.8
4: Very well (%)	24.1	11.1	16.7	.
3: Fairly well (%)	55.2	50.0	61.1	23.1
2: Not very well (%)	13.8	27.8	22.2	30.8
1: Not at all (%)	6.9	11.1	.	46.2
Total (N)	58	18	18	13

H7_1: Participated in RPT process as candidate	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
No (%)	53.4	21.1	16.7	92.3
Yes (%)	46.6	78.9	83.3	7.7
Total (N)	58	19	18	13

H7_2: Participated in RPT process as voter	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
No (%)	8.6	10.5	100.0	100.0
Yes (%)	91.4	89.5	.	.
Total (N)	58	19	18	13

H7_3: Participated in RPT process as review committee member	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
No (%)	37.9	73.7	100.0	92.3
Yes (%)	62.1	26.3	.	7.7
Total (N)	58	19	18	13

H7_4: Have never participated in RPT process	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
No (%)	98.3	89.5	83.3	15.4
Yes (%)	1.7	10.5	16.7	84.6
Total (N)	58	19	18	13

H8: Understand dept RPT standards	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.5	3.1	2.9	2.2
4: Very well (%)	59.6	31.6	16.7	7.7
3: Fairly well (%)	36.8	47.4	55.6	30.8
2: Not very well (%)	1.8	21.1	27.8	38.5
1: Not at all (%)	1.8	.	.	23.1
Total (N)	57	19	18	13

H9: Understand dept RPT procedures	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.6	3.3	3.0	2.3
4: Very well (%)	61.4	42.1	22.2	8.3
3: Fairly well (%)	38.6	47.4	55.6	33.3
2: Not very well (%)	.	10.5	22.2	33.3
1: Not at all (%)	.	.	.	25.0
Total (N)	57	19	18	12

H10: Departmental RPT standards applied consistently/fairly	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.2	2.6	3.0	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	30.9	10.5	20.0	33.3
3: Agree (%)	61.8	47.4	70.0	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	7.3	36.8	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	5.3	10.0	.
Total (N)	55	19	10	6

H11: Departmental RPT procedures applied consistently/fairly	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.3	2.7	3.0	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	37.5	10.5	30.0	28.6
3: Agree (%)	53.6	57.9	50.0	71.4
2: Disagree (%)	8.9	26.3	10.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	5.3	10.0	.
Total (N)	56	19	10	7

H12a: Sufficient resources for teaching/mentoring students	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.6	2.6	3.3	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	11.1	6.3	26.7	10.0
3: Agree (%)	50.0	56.3	73.3	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	29.6	31.3	.	40.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.3	6.3	.	.
Total (N)	54	16	15	10

H12b: Sufficient resources for discovery of knowledge	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.4	2.5	3.3	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	4.4	.	25.0	.
3: Agree (%)	46.7	60.0	75.0	77.8
2: Disagree (%)	35.6	26.7	.	11.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	13.3	13.3	.	11.1
Total (N)	45	15	12	9

H12c: Sufficient resources for creative artistry and literature	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.0	3.7	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	.	66.7	.
3: Agree (%)	75.0	33.3	33.3	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	25.0	33.3	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	33.3	.	.
Total (N)	8	3	3	1

H12d: Sufficient resources for tech/managerial innovation	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.4	2.5	3.7	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	.	66.7	.
3: Agree (%)	52.0	58.3	33.3	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	32.0	33.3	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	16.0	8.3	.	.
Total (N)	25	12	6	7

H12e: Sufficient resources for extension/engagement	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.5	2.4	3.5	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	.	50.0	25.0
3: Agree (%)	62.5	66.7	50.0	75.0
2: Disagree (%)	20.8	11.1	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	16.7	22.2	.	.
Total (N)	24	9	6	4

H12f: Sufficient resources for professional service	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.5	2.7	3.1	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	7.1	7.1	42.9	12.5
3: Agree (%)	50.0	64.3	28.6	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	33.3	21.4	28.6	37.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.5	7.1	.	.
Total (N)	42	14	7	8

H13a: Department rewards teaching/mentoring of students	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.7	2.8	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	17.9	5.9	15.4	9.1
3: Agree (%)	51.8	64.7	61.5	36.4
2: Disagree (%)	23.2	23.5	15.4	54.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.1	5.9	7.7	.
Total (N)	56	17	13	11

H13b: Department rewards discovery of knowledge	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	3.4	3.5	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	29.8	36.4	53.8	10.0
3: Agree (%)	53.2	63.6	46.2	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	14.9	.	.	30.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.1	.	.	.
Total (N)	47	11	13	10

H13c: Department rewards creative artistry and literature	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.7	2.3	2.4	4.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	25.0	20.0	100.0
3: Agree (%)	66.7	25.0	40.0	.
2: Disagree (%)	33.3	.	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	50.0	40.0	.
Total (N)	6	4	5	1

H13d: Department rewards tech/managerial innovation	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	2.5	3.4	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.0	9.1	37.5	.
3: Agree (%)	70.0	45.5	62.5	62.5
2: Disagree (%)	15.0	27.3	.	37.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.0	18.2	.	.
Total (N)	20	11	8	8

H13e: Department rewards extension/engagement	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	2.5	3.3	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	17.2	7.7	42.9	11.1
3: Agree (%)	62.1	53.8	42.9	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	13.8	15.4	14.3	44.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.9	23.1	.	11.1
Total (N)	29	13	7	9

H13f: Department rewards professional service	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9	3.4	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	12.5	6.3	37.5	9.1
3: Agree (%)	58.3	75.0	62.5	45.5
2: Disagree (%)	25.0	18.8	.	45.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.2	.	.	.
Total (N)	48	16	8	11

Back to Top

Section I: Post-Tenure Review

I1_1: No experience with PTR	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Has experience (%)	94.6	63.2	5.6	.
No experience (%)	5.4	36.8	94.4	100.0
Total (N)	56	19	18	5

I1_2: Have had PTR Comprehensive Review	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
No (%)	23.2	42.1	94.4	100.0
Yes (%)	76.8	57.9	5.6	.
Total (N)	56	19	18	5

I1_3: Have served on PTR committee	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
No (%)	53.6	73.7	100.0	100.0
Yes (%)	46.4	26.3	.	.
Total (N)	56	19	18	5

I1_4: Have been dept/college administrator in PTR process	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
No (%)	87.5	94.7	100.0	100.0
Yes (%)	12.5	5.3	.	.
Total (N)	56	19	18	5

I1_5: Had other PTR experience	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
No (%)	96.4	100.0	100.0	100.0
Yes (%)	3.6	.	.	.
Total (N)	56	19	18	5

I2a: Easy to find PTR information on NCSU website	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.0	2.6	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.4	7.7	20.0
3: Agree (%)	77.1	53.8	80.0
2: Disagree (%)	10.4	30.8	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.1	7.7	.
Total (N)	48	13	5

I2b: PTR process known/understood in department	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9	3.0	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	13.2	14.3	25.0	.
3: Agree (%)	67.9	57.1	50.0	.
2: Disagree (%)	17.0	28.6	25.0	100.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.9	.	.	.
Total (N)	53	14	4	1

I2c: Departmental PTR procedures are clear	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	15.1	14.3	20.0
3: Agree (%)	75.5	64.3	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	7.5	21.4	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.9	.	.
Total (N)	53	14	5

I2d: Departmental PTR standards are clear	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	13.2	7.7	20.0
3: Agree (%)	62.3	69.2	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	18.9	23.1	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.7	.	.
Total (N)	53	13	5

I2e: Departmental PTR procedures are followed equitably	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.2	3.0	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	22.2	16.7	25.0
3: Agree (%)	77.8	75.0	75.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	8.3	.
Total (N)	45	12	4

I2f: Departmental PTR standards are applied fairly	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.2	3.0	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	23.3	16.7	33.3
3: Agree (%)	74.4	75.0	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	2.3	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	8.3	.
Total (N)	43	12	3

I2g: Dept PTR committee members are well prepared and trained	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	15.4	10.0	33.3
3: Agree (%)	64.1	70.0	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	15.4	20.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.1	.	.
Total (N)	39	10	3

I3: Overall satisfaction with PTR process	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.7	2.4	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	11.5	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	59.6	61.5	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	17.3	15.4	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	11.5	23.1	.
Total (N)	52	13	1

Back to Top

Section J: Pay and Compensation

J1a: My salary is competitive within my department	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.7	2.2	3.0	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	15.2	6.7	.	.
3: Agree (%)	47.8	26.7	100.0	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	23.9	46.7	.	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	13.0	20.0	.	.
Total (N)	46	15	12	12

J1b: My salary is competitive within my college	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.2	2.1	3.0	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	3.8	7.1	.	.
3: Agree (%)	30.8	28.6	100.0	75.0
2: Disagree (%)	46.2	28.6	.	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	19.2	35.7	.	.
Total (N)	26	14	9	8

J1c: My salary is competitive within NC State	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.1	2.1	2.9	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	3.4	7.1	.	.
3: Agree (%)	27.6	28.6	88.9	83.3
2: Disagree (%)	48.3	35.7	11.1	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	20.7	28.6	.	16.7
Total (N)	29	14	9	6

J1d: My salary is competitive within UNC system	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	1.8	1.9	2.9	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	6.3	.	.
3: Agree (%)	16.7	18.8	88.9	57.1
2: Disagree (%)	45.8	31.3	11.1	42.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	37.5	43.8	.	.
Total (N)	24	16	9	7

J1e: My salary is competitive within discipline at comparable institutions	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	1.7	1.8	2.4	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	2.7	5.3	.	11.1
3: Agree (%)	10.8	21.1	41.7	55.6
2: Disagree (%)	40.5	26.3	58.3	22.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	45.9	47.4	.	11.1
Total (N)	37	19	12	9

J2: Understand how faculty salaries determined	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.7	2.1	2.0
4: Very well (%)	26.8	10.5	.	7.7
3: Fairly well (%)	42.9	68.4	38.9	23.1
2: Not very well (%)	12.5	.	33.3	30.8
1: Not at all (%)	17.9	21.1	27.8	38.5
Total (N)	56	19	18	13

J3: My department links salary increase to meritorious performance	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	2.8	3.0	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	31.4	11.8	7.7	9.1
3: Agree (%)	52.9	58.8	84.6	54.5
2: Disagree (%)	9.8	23.5	7.7	27.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.9	5.9	.	9.1
Total (N)	51	17	13	11

J4: I have access to benefits information	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.3	3.1	3.1	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	38.2	22.2	11.1	38.5
3: Agree (%)	58.2	66.7	83.3	46.2
2: Disagree (%)	1.8	11.1	5.6	15.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.8	.	.	.
Total (N)	55	18	18	13

J5: Healthcare benefits are competitive with other institutions	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	1.9	2.1	2.1	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	2.3	11.8	6.3	10.0
3: Agree (%)	25.0	11.8	31.3	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	29.5	47.1	31.3	30.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	43.2	29.4	31.3	20.0
Total (N)	44	17	16	10

J6: Retirement programs are competitive with other institutions	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.2	2.6	2.4	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	5.6	5.6	.	30.0
3: Agree (%)	30.6	61.1	58.3	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	38.9	16.7	25.0	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	25.0	16.7	16.7	.
Total (N)	36	18	12	10

J7: Voluntary benefits programs are competitive with other institutions	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.5	2.5	2.9	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	3.3	.	.	16.7
3: Agree (%)	60.0	69.2	85.7	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	16.7	7.7	14.3	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	20.0	23.1	.	.
Total (N)	30	13	7	6

J8: I am satisfied with my compensation at NC State	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.4	2.1	2.9	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	3.6	.	5.9	16.7
3: Agree (%)	44.6	26.3	82.4	58.3
2: Disagree (%)	41.1	57.9	11.8	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	10.7	15.8	.	.
Total (N)	56	19	17	12

J9: Departmental environment enables work/personal life balance	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9	2.8	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	18.9	17.6	16.7	.
3: Agree (%)	54.7	58.8	50.0	75.0
2: Disagree (%)	15.1	17.6	27.8	8.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	11.3	5.9	5.6	16.7
Total (N)	53	17	18	12

J10: NCSU environment enables work/personal life balance	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.6	2.6	2.8	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	5.7	5.9	11.8	.
3: Agree (%)	67.9	58.8	64.7	83.3
2: Disagree (%)	11.3	29.4	17.6	8.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	15.1	5.9	5.9	8.3
Total (N)	53	17	17	12

J11a: Importance of flexible work hours	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.5	3.6	3.9	3.8
4: Very important (%)	69.1	76.5	88.9	76.9
3: Somewhat important (%)	20.0	11.8	11.1	23.1
2: Not very important (%)	5.5	5.9	.	.
1: Not at all important (%)	5.5	5.9	.	.
Total (N)	55	17	18	13

J11b: Importance of maternity/paternity leave	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.5	3.7	3.9	3.8
4: Very important (%)	64.8	76.5	94.4	76.9
3: Somewhat important (%)	25.9	17.6	5.6	23.1
2: Not very important (%)	3.7	5.9	.	.
1: Not at all important (%)	5.6	.	.	.
Total (N)	54	17	18	13

J11c: Importance of family leave time	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.5	3.8	3.9	3.7
4: Very important (%)	58.5	82.4	88.9	69.2
3: Somewhat important (%)	32.1	17.6	11.1	30.8
2: Not very important (%)	7.5	.	.	.
1: Not at all important (%)	1.9	.	.	.
Total (N)	53	17	18	13

J11d: Importance of altering tenure clock for family concerns	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.5	3.5	4.0	3.5
4: Very important (%)	63.0	64.7	100.0	69.2
3: Somewhat important (%)	25.9	23.5	.	23.1
2: Not very important (%)	9.3	11.8	.	.
1: Not at all important (%)	1.9	.	.	7.7
Total (N)	54	17	18	13

J11e: Importance of childcare facility on or near campus	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.2	3.3	3.8	3.2
4: Very important (%)	42.6	52.9	83.3	46.2
3: Somewhat important (%)	42.6	29.4	16.7	30.8
2: Not very important (%)	9.3	11.8	.	15.4
1: Not at all important (%)	5.6	5.9	.	7.7
Total (N)	54	17	18	13

J11f: Importance of tuition remission for dependents	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.4	3.6	3.2	3.2
4: Very important (%)	57.4	77.8	50.0	53.8
3: Somewhat important (%)	25.9	11.1	27.8	23.1
2: Not very important (%)	13.0	5.6	16.7	15.4
1: Not at all important (%)	3.7	5.6	5.6	7.7
Total (N)	54	18	18	13

Back to Top

Section K: Campus Infrastructure/Physical Environment

K1: I have sufficient clerical/admin support in my dept	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.6	2.5	3.1	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	17.9	5.3	33.3	7.7
3: Agree (%)	35.7	52.6	44.4	53.8
2: Disagree (%)	32.1	31.6	16.7	30.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	14.3	10.5	5.6	7.7
Total (N)	56	19	18	13

K2: I have sufficient tech assistance	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.5	2.6	2.8	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	16.1	.	27.8	23.1
3: Agree (%)	35.7	63.2	33.3	46.2
2: Disagree (%)	33.9	31.6	27.8	23.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	14.3	5.3	11.1	7.7
Total (N)	56	19	18	13

K3: There is sufficient support staff in my college	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.5	2.7	3.1	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	9.1	5.3	23.5	25.0
3: Agree (%)	47.3	63.2	58.8	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	25.5	26.3	17.6	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	18.2	5.3	.	16.7
Total (N)	55	19	17	12

K4a: Satisfaction with office space	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	3.1	3.4	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	30.4	21.1	55.6	46.2
3: Satisfied (%)	51.8	63.2	33.3	38.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	12.5	15.8	11.1	7.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.4	.	.	7.7
Total (N)	56	19	18	13

K4b: Satisfaction with lab space	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	2.5	3.1	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	25.0	12.5	27.3	33.3
3: Satisfied (%)	45.8	50.0	54.5	.
2: Dissatisfied (%)	20.8	12.5	18.2	66.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	8.3	25.0	.	.
Total (N)	24	8	11	3

K4c: Satisfaction with classrooms in which you teach	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.4	2.4	2.9	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	7.3	5.6	16.7	.
3: Satisfied (%)	45.5	38.9	55.6	61.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	27.3	44.4	27.8	38.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	20.0	11.1	.	.
Total (N)	55	18	18	13

K4d: Satisfaction with labs in which you teach	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.7	2.4	3.4	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	11.1	.	62.5	16.7
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	55.6	12.5	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	33.3	33.3	25.0	50.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.6	11.1	.	.
Total (N)	18	9	8	6

K4e: Satisfaction with maintenance of building in which you work	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.3	2.4	3.0	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	7.3	10.5	27.8	8.3
3: Satisfied (%)	40.0	31.6	44.4	58.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	29.1	42.1	27.8	8.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	23.6	15.8	.	25.0
Total (N)	55	19	18	12

K4f: Satisfaction with infrastructure of bldgs in which you work	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.3	2.3	2.9	2.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	3.6	10.5	27.8	.
3: Satisfied (%)	41.8	26.3	38.9	38.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	34.5	42.1	33.3	38.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	20.0	21.1	.	23.1
Total (N)	55	19	18	13

K4g: Satisfaction with availability of up-to-date equipment	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.5	2.5	3.0	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	7.5	12.5	33.3	7.7
3: Satisfied (%)	50.9	43.8	38.9	61.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	26.4	25.0	22.2	7.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	15.1	18.8	5.6	23.1
Total (N)	53	16	18	13

K4h: Satisfaction with availability of office supplies	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0	3.2	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	20.4	21.1	27.8	.
3: Satisfied (%)	57.4	63.2	61.1	92.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	14.8	10.5	11.1	7.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	7.4	5.3	.	.
Total (N)	54	19	18	13

K4i: Satisfaction with availability of informal meeting space	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.5	2.7	2.6	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	9.1	17.6	33.3	.
3: Satisfied (%)	45.5	41.2	5.6	69.2
2: Dissatisfied (%)	30.9	35.3	44.4	15.4
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	14.5	5.9	16.7	15.4
Total (N)	55	17	18	13

K4j: Satisfaction with dining options on campus	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.1	2.3	2.2	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	4.9	.	13.3	.
3: Satisfied (%)	26.8	43.8	20.0	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	46.3	37.5	40.0	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	22.0	18.8	26.7	.
Total (N)	41	16	15	9

K4k: Satisfaction with availability of parking	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.4	2.2	2.7	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	1.9	.	16.7	16.7
3: Satisfied (%)	53.7	38.9	55.6	58.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	31.5	44.4	11.1	8.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	13.0	16.7	16.7	16.7
Total (N)	54	18	18	12

K4l: Satisfaction with cost of parking	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.2	1.9	2.6	2.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	.	11.8	15.4
3: Satisfied (%)	43.4	33.3	41.2	38.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	30.2	22.2	41.2	15.4
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	26.4	44.4	5.9	30.8
Total (N)	53	18	17	13

K4m: Satisfaction with Wolfline	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	3.0	2.7	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	10.5	.	10.0	20.0
3: Satisfied (%)	57.9	100.0	50.0	80.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	31.6	.	40.0	.
Total (N)	19	4	10	5

K4n: Satisfaction with commute between Centennial and main	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.1	2.0	2.5	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	8.3	.	15.4	.
3: Satisfied (%)	25.0	22.2	38.5	57.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	36.1	55.6	23.1	42.9
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	30.6	22.2	23.1	.
Total (N)	36	9	13	7

K4o: Satisfaction with campus safety	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8	3.0	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	4.3	5.6	14.3	.
3: Satisfied (%)	76.6	66.7	71.4	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	10.6	27.8	14.3	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	8.5	.	.	.
Total (N)	47	18	14	11

K4p: Satisfaction with campus aesthetics	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.4	2.6	2.8	2.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	3.6	.	12.5	.
3: Satisfied (%)	47.3	62.5	50.0	58.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	38.2	37.5	37.5	25.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	10.9	.	.	16.7
Total (N)	55	16	16	12

K4q: Satisfaction with upkeep of campus grounds	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	3.0	3.0	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	5.5	6.3	14.3	7.7
3: Satisfied (%)	74.5	87.5	71.4	53.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	14.5	6.3	14.3	38.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.5	.	.	.
Total (N)	55	16	14	13

K4r: Satisfaction with amount of green space	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.5	2.7	2.7	2.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	1.9	5.6	5.6	.
3: Satisfied (%)	56.6	66.7	61.1	41.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	32.1	22.2	27.8	50.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	9.4	5.6	5.6	8.3
Total (N)	53	18	18	12

K5a: Satisfaction with energy conservation	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.6	2.5	2.9	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	4.5	.	15.4	.
3: Satisfied (%)	54.5	66.7	61.5	88.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	34.1	20.0	23.1	11.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.8	13.3	.	.
Total (N)	44	15	13	9

K5b: Satisfaction with water conservation	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.7	3.0	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	5.7	.	16.7	.
3: Satisfied (%)	71.4	76.9	66.7	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	22.9	15.4	16.7	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	7.7	.	.
Total (N)	35	13	12	9

K5c: Satisfaction with recycling efforts	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	2.8	3.1	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	16.0	6.3	25.0	27.3
3: Satisfied (%)	74.0	75.0	62.5	72.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	6.0	12.5	12.5	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	4.0	6.3	.	.
Total (N)	50	16	16	11

K5d: Satisfaction with alternative transportation	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.6	2.6	2.7	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	2.7	6.7	9.1	11.1
3: Satisfied (%)	59.5	53.3	63.6	77.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	35.1	33.3	18.2	11.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.7	6.7	9.1	.
Total (N)	37	15	11	9

K5e: Satisfaction with green building practices	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.4	2.8	3.1	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	.	25.0	.
3: Satisfied (%)	56.5	77.8	62.5	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	30.4	22.2	12.5	50.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	13.0	.	.	.
Total (N)	23	9	8	6

K5f: Satisfaction with use of recycled-content resources	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8	3.1	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	4.5	.	25.0	14.3
3: Satisfied (%)	72.7	81.8	62.5	71.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	18.2	18.2	12.5	14.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	4.5	.	.	.
Total (N)	22	11	8	7

K6: Interest in hotel/conference center on Centennial Campus	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.6	2.5	2.9	2.6
4: A lot (%)	25.9	21.1	38.9	25.0
3: Some (%)	35.2	36.8	27.8	25.0
2: A little (%)	14.8	10.5	22.2	33.3
1: None at all (%)	24.1	31.6	11.1	16.7
Total (N)	54	19	18	12

K7: Likelihood of using conference center on Centennial Campus	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.7	2.8	2.6
4: Very likely (%)	27.3	22.2	33.3	25.0
3: Somewhat likely (%)	36.4	38.9	27.8	33.3
2: Not very likely (%)	29.1	22.2	22.2	16.7
1: Not at all likely (%)	7.3	16.7	16.7	25.0
Total (N)	55	18	18	12

Back to Top

Section L: Recreation/Wellness

L1: Satisfaction with recreation activities on campus	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	2.9	2.9	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	17.0	10.5	11.8	23.1
3: Satisfied (%)	73.6	73.7	70.6	53.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	9.4	15.8	17.6	15.4
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	.	.	7.7
Total (N)	53	19	17	13

L2: Satisfaction with cultural activities on campus	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.7	2.5	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	3.9	5.3	5.9	7.7
3: Satisfied (%)	70.6	68.4	41.2	84.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	23.5	21.1	47.1	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.0	5.3	5.9	7.7
Total (N)	51	19	17	13

L3a: Satisfaction with Carmichael Gymnasium	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	2.8	2.8	3.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	26.3	8.3	15.4	37.5
3: Satisfied (%)	63.2	66.7	53.8	62.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	7.9	25.0	30.8	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.6	.	.	.
Total (N)	38	12	13	8

L3b: Satisfaction with recreation space around campus	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	2.8	2.8	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	17.6	.	9.1	33.3
3: Satisfied (%)	67.6	83.3	63.6	55.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	11.8	16.7	27.3	11.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.9	.	.	.
Total (N)	34	12	11	9

L3c: Satisfaction with organized Campus Recreation activities	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9	3.1	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.7	.	12.5	33.3
3: Satisfied (%)	86.7	85.7	87.5	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	6.7	14.3	.	16.7
Total (N)	15	7	8	6

L3d: Satisfaction with ARTS NC State programs	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	2.7	2.9	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	12.9	.	11.1	12.5
3: Satisfied (%)	71.0	81.8	66.7	75.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	16.1	9.1	22.2	12.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	9.1	.	.
Total (N)	31	11	9	8

L3e: Satisfaction with Wolfpack athletic events	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9	3.1	3.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	9.4	12.5	22.2	60.0
3: Satisfied (%)	71.9	75.0	66.7	40.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	6.3	.	11.1	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	12.5	12.5	.	.
Total (N)	32	8	9	5

L4a: How often use Carmichael Gymnasium	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.3	3.0	3.8	3.5
Once a week or more (%)	30.2	10.5	44.4	50.0
A few times a month (%)	11.3	15.8	5.6	.
A few times a semester (%)	7.5	21.1	5.6	.
Once a semester (%)	3.8	5.3	11.1	.
Once a year (%)	7.5	10.5	.	.
Never (%)	39.6	36.8	33.3	50.0
Total (N)	53	19	18	12

L4b: How often use recreational space around campus	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.7	2.1	3.2	3.0
Once a week or more (%)	9.4	.	22.2	16.7
A few times a month (%)	11.3	5.3	16.7	16.7
A few times a semester (%)	15.1	21.1	11.1	8.3
Once a semester (%)	11.3	5.3	.	8.3
Once a year (%)	9.4	15.8	5.6	8.3
Never (%)	43.4	52.6	44.4	41.7
Total (N)	53	19	18	12

L4c: How often participate in organized Campus Recreation activities	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	1.5	1.3	2.2	1.5
Once a week or more (%)	2.0	.	11.8	.
A few times a month (%)	2.0	5.6	.	.
A few times a semester (%)	5.9	.	11.8	16.7
Once a semester (%)	5.9	.	11.8	.
Once a year (%)	2.0	5.6	5.9	.
Never (%)	82.4	88.9	58.8	83.3
Total (N)	51	18	17	12

L4d: How often attend ARTS NC State programs	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.5	2.5	2.5	2.3
Once a week or more (%)	3.8	.	5.6	.
A few times a month (%)	5.7	15.8	.	.
A few times a semester (%)	18.9	10.5	27.8	8.3
Once a semester (%)	17.0	21.1	16.7	41.7
Once a year (%)	18.9	10.5	5.6	16.7
Never (%)	35.8	42.1	44.4	33.3
Total (N)	53	19	18	12

L4e: How often attend Wolfpack athletic events	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.2	1.7	2.2	1.9
Once a week or more (%)	.	.	5.6	8.3
A few times a month (%)	3.8	5.3	.	.
A few times a semester (%)	17.3	10.5	22.2	8.3
Once a semester (%)	13.5	5.3	11.1	8.3
Once a year (%)	23.1	10.5	5.6	8.3
Never (%)	42.3	68.4	55.6	66.7
Total (N)	52	19	18	12

L5: Interest in designated faculty-only dining facility	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.5	2.6	2.9	2.5
4: A great deal (%)	34.0	31.6	41.2	23.1
3: Some (%)	20.8	26.3	23.5	30.8
2: A little (%)	9.4	15.8	17.6	15.4
1: None at all (%)	35.8	26.3	17.6	30.8
Total (N)	53	19	17	13

L6: Likelihood of using gym on Centennial campus	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	1.5	1.5	2.6	1.7
4: Very likely (%)	11.3	5.3	33.3	.
3: Somewhat likely (%)	5.7	10.5	16.7	15.4
2: Not very likely (%)	9.4	15.8	27.8	38.5
1: Not at all likely (%)	73.6	68.4	22.2	46.2
Total (N)	53	19	18	13

Back to Top

Section M: Work Activities

M1: Total hours per week spent performing job-related work (collapsed)	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track
Mean # Hrs Work	58.3	57.5	61.5	54.1
more than 60 hrs (%)	21.8	33.3	44.4	.
51 to 60 hrs (%)	43.6	22.2	44.4	53.8
41 to 50 hrs (%)	30.9	27.8	5.6	46.2
40 hrs or less (%)	3.6	16.7	5.6	.
Total (N)	55	18	18	13

M2A: Proportion of total hours spent on teaching/mentoring	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track
Mean % of Time on Activity	37.3	30.3	34.1	58.4
more than 50% of time (%)	16.4	10.5	11.1	53.8
26% to 50% of time (%)	60.0	57.9	50.0	38.5
11% to 25% of time (%)	18.2	10.5	38.9	7.7
6% to 10% of time (%)	1.8	10.5	.	.
1% to 5% of time (%)	1.8	.	.	.
0% of time (%)	1.8	10.5	.	.
Total (N)	55	19	18	13

M2a_1r: Includes teaching (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track
No (%)	14.8	17.6	16.7	15.4
Yes (%)	85.2	82.4	83.3	84.6
Total (N)