North Carolina State University
2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey:

Results for the College of Physical and Mathematical Sciences
by Race/Ethnicity1

To skip directly to a particular section, select the section below.

Section B: Image and Vision	Section I: Post-Tenure Review
Section C: Leadership	Section J: Pay and Compensation
Section D: Faculty-Administration Relationships	Section K: Campus Infrastructure/Physical Environment
Section E: Diversity/Multiculturalism	Section L: Recreation/Wellness
Section F: Working Relationships	Section M: Work Activities
Section G: Faculty Support & Professional Development	Section N: Conclusions/Overall Satisfaction
Section H: Performance Review, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure

A2: Ever held an administrative position	White	Faculty of Color
..... No (%)	72.8	88.5
..... Yes (%)	27.2	11.5
Total (N)	92	26

Back to Top

Section B: Image and Vision

B1a: Department doing good job of recruiting faculty	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	30.0	44.0
3: Agree (%)	54.4	56.0
2: Disagree (%)	11.1	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.4	.
Total (N)	90	25

B1b: Department creating culture where faculty can develop to full potential	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	21.1	40.0
3: Agree (%)	51.1	36.0
2: Disagree (%)	23.3	24.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.4	.
Total (N)	90	25

B1c: Department retaining most effective and productive faculty	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	12.8	25.0
3: Agree (%)	52.3	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	23.3	20.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	11.6	4.2
Total (N)	86	24

B2a: Department national reputation for undergraduate educ	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.9	3.8
5: Very strong (%)	21.8	16.0
4: Strong (%)	43.7	48.0
3: Average (%)	32.2	36.0
2: Weak (%)	2.3	.
Total (N)	87	25

B2b: Department national reputation for graduate education	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	3.9
5: Very strong (%)	10.2	19.2
4: Strong (%)	38.6	50.0
3: Average (%)	45.5	30.8
2: Weak (%)	4.5	.
1: Very weak (%)	1.1	.
Total (N)	88	26

B2c: Department national reputation for research & scholarly activity	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.8	4.0
5: Very strong (%)	13.3	15.4
4: Strong (%)	53.3	73.1
3: Average (%)	30.0	11.5
2: Weak (%)	3.3	.
Total (N)	90	26

B2d: Department national reputation for creative artistry and literature	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	4.1
5: Very strong (%)	8.3	28.6
4: Strong (%)	33.3	57.1
3: Average (%)	41.7	14.3
2: Weak (%)	8.3	.
1: Very weak (%)	8.3	.
Total (N)	12	7

B2e: Department national reputation for tech & managerial innovation	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.4	3.8
5: Very strong (%)	2.0	13.3
4: Strong (%)	40.8	53.3
3: Average (%)	53.1	33.3
2: Weak (%)	4.1	.
Total (N)	49	15

B2f: Department national reputation for extension & engagement	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.4	4.0
5: Very strong (%)	7.1	15.8
4: Strong (%)	40.0	68.4
3: Average (%)	42.9	15.8
2: Weak (%)	10.0	.
Total (N)	70	19

B2g: Department national reputation for contrib to econ Development	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	3.8
5: Very strong (%)	5.8	6.3
4: Strong (%)	28.8	68.8
3: Average (%)	53.8	18.8
2: Weak (%)	7.7	6.3
1: Very weak (%)	3.8	.
Total (N)	52	16

B3a: Grade undergraduate majors' ability to meet prog demands	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	4.0	4.0
A (%)	29.5	19.2
B (%)	51.1	57.7
C (%)	12.5	23.1
D (%)	6.8	.
Total (N)	88	26

B3b: Grade graduate student ability to meet prog demands	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	4.0	3.9
A (%)	17.8	7.7
B (%)	63.3	76.9
C (%)	15.6	15.4
D (%)	3.3	.
Total (N)	90	26

B3c: Grade demonstrated professional ability of faculty	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	4.4	4.6
A (%)	47.3	65.4
B (%)	44.0	30.8
C (%)	7.7	3.8
D (%)	1.1	.
Total (N)	91	26

B3d: Grade professional achievement of faculty	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	4.4	4.6
A (%)	48.4	65.4
B (%)	45.1	30.8
C (%)	5.5	3.8
D (%)	1.1	.
Total (N)	91	26

B3e: Grade own demonstrated professional ability	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	4.5	4.7
A (%)	49.4	73.1
B (%)	49.4	23.1
C (%)	.	3.8
F (%)	1.1	.
Total (N)	89	26

B3f: Grade own professional achievement	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	4.4	4.7
A (%)	44.9	73.1
B (%)	50.6	23.1
C (%)	3.4	3.8
F (%)	1.1	.
Total (N)	89	26

B4: Department's vision for the future	White	Faculty of Color
Clear vision; actively working toward goals (%)	41.8	44.0
Vision with slow progress (%)	46.2	44.0
No clear vision (%)	11.0	8.0
Not familiar (%)	1.1	4.0
Total (N)	91	25

B5: Agreement with department vision for future	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	29.1	50.0
3: Agree (%)	59.5	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	10.1	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.3	.
Total (N)	79	22

B6: College's vision for the future	White	Faculty of Color
Clear vision; actively working toward goals (%)	24.2	30.8
Vision with slow progress (%)	25.3	30.8
No clear vision (%)	22.0	.
Not familiar (%)	28.6	38.5
Total (N)	91	26

B7a: Department change in next five years	White	Faculty of Color
Change for the better (%)	39.6	61.5
Change for the worse (%)	25.3	11.5
Not really change (%)	35.2	26.9
Total (N)	91	26

B7b: College change in next five years	White	Faculty of Color
Change for the better (%)	27.6	52.0
Change for the worse (%)	20.7	8.0
Not really change (%)	51.7	40.0
Total (N)	87	25

B7c: NC State change in next five years	White	Faculty of Color
Change for the better (%)	29.9	57.7
Change for the worse (%)	14.9	7.7
Not really change (%)	55.2	34.6
Total (N)	87	26

Back to Top

Section C: Leadership

C1a: Dept admin communication with faculty	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.6
4: Excellent (%)	38.9	68.0
3: Good (%)	36.7	24.0
2: Fair (%)	12.2	8.0
1: Poor (%)	12.2	.
Total (N)	90	25

C1b: Dept admin seek faculty input for dept vision	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.5
4: Excellent (%)	38.9	62.5
3: Good (%)	40.0	20.8
2: Fair (%)	12.2	16.7
1: Poor (%)	8.9	.
Total (N)	90	24

C1c: Dept admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	3.2
4: Excellent (%)	25.8	44.0
3: Good (%)	41.6	36.0
2: Fair (%)	21.3	20.0
1: Poor (%)	11.2	.
Total (N)	89	25

C1d: Dept admin delegate dept responsibility to faculty	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.4
4: Excellent (%)	29.5	50.0
3: Good (%)	47.7	37.5
2: Fair (%)	17.0	12.5
1: Poor (%)	5.7	.
Total (N)	88	24

C1e: Dept admin grant faculty autonomy	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.3
4: Excellent (%)	39.1	48.0
3: Good (%)	41.4	36.0
2: Fair (%)	13.8	16.0
1: Poor (%)	5.7	.
Total (N)	87	25

C1f: Dept admin set clear and explicit priorities	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	3.1
4: Excellent (%)	15.7	32.0
3: Good (%)	56.2	48.0
2: Fair (%)	20.2	20.0
1: Poor (%)	7.9	.
Total (N)	89	25

C1g: Dept admin appreciate your contrib to mission	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	3.1
4: Excellent (%)	28.4	41.7
3: Good (%)	44.3	33.3
2: Fair (%)	15.9	16.7
1: Poor (%)	11.4	8.3
Total (N)	88	24

C1h: Dept admin conflict resolution	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	3.1
4: Excellent (%)	19.0	40.0
3: Good (%)	41.8	40.0
2: Fair (%)	22.8	10.0
1: Poor (%)	16.5	10.0
Total (N)	79	20

C1i: Dept admin provide necessary resources	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	3.1
4: Excellent (%)	16.7	41.7
3: Good (%)	38.9	29.2
2: Fair (%)	31.1	29.2
1: Poor (%)	13.3	.
Total (N)	90	24

C1j: Dept admin allocate resources fairly	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	18.8	41.7
3: Good (%)	52.9	25.0
2: Fair (%)	17.6	29.2
1: Poor (%)	10.6	4.2
Total (N)	85	24

C1k: Dept admin serve as advocate for dept to college	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.5
4: Excellent (%)	37.5	66.7
3: Good (%)	41.3	20.8
2: Fair (%)	12.5	12.5
1: Poor (%)	8.8	.
Total (N)	80	24

C1l: Dept admin support academic freedom	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.4	3.6
4: Excellent (%)	49.4	62.5
3: Good (%)	41.8	33.3
2: Fair (%)	6.3	4.2
1: Poor (%)	2.5	.
Total (N)	79	24

C1m: Dept admin make rational decisions	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	3.4
4: Excellent (%)	27.3	52.0
3: Good (%)	43.2	40.0
2: Fair (%)	21.6	8.0
1: Poor (%)	8.0	.
Total (N)	88	25

C1n: Dept admin make equitable decisions	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	3.2
4: Excellent (%)	25.9	50.0
3: Good (%)	45.9	20.8
2: Fair (%)	17.6	29.2
1: Poor (%)	10.6	.
Total (N)	85	24

C1o: Dept admin promote diversity within dept	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	3.4
4: Excellent (%)	45.9	62.5
3: Good (%)	42.4	20.8
2: Fair (%)	11.8	12.5
1: Poor (%)	.	4.2
Total (N)	85	24

C2a: College admin communication with faculty	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	9.1	31.8
3: Good (%)	41.6	45.5
2: Fair (%)	35.1	18.2
1: Poor (%)	14.3	4.5
Total (N)	77	22

C2b: College admin seek faculty input for vision	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.2	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	5.8	25.0
3: Good (%)	29.0	25.0
2: Fair (%)	43.5	45.0
1: Poor (%)	21.7	5.0
Total (N)	69	20

C2c: College admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.3	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	6.8	28.6
3: Good (%)	33.9	28.6
2: Fair (%)	39.0	33.3
1: Poor (%)	20.3	9.5
Total (N)	59	21

C2d: College admin grant departmental autonomy	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	20.3	33.3
3: Good (%)	52.7	38.1
2: Fair (%)	14.9	19.0
1: Poor (%)	12.2	9.5
Total (N)	74	21

C2e: College admin set clear and explicit priorities	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	3.1
4: Excellent (%)	10.8	40.0
3: Good (%)	41.5	30.0
2: Fair (%)	32.3	30.0
1: Poor (%)	15.4	.
Total (N)	65	20

C2f: College admin appreciate your contrib to mission	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	13.8	40.0
3: Good (%)	49.2	20.0
2: Fair (%)	20.0	30.0
1: Poor (%)	16.9	10.0
Total (N)	65	20

C2g: College admin conflict resolution	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	3.3
4: Excellent (%)	8.3	46.2
3: Good (%)	50.0	38.5
2: Fair (%)	22.2	15.4
1: Poor (%)	19.4	.
Total (N)	36	13

C2h: College admin provide necessary resources	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.2	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	7.3	31.8
3: Good (%)	36.6	27.3
2: Fair (%)	26.8	36.4
1: Poor (%)	29.3	4.5
Total (N)	82	22

C2i: College admin allocate resources fairly	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.3	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	6.0	47.4
3: Good (%)	43.3	15.8
2: Fair (%)	29.9	21.1
1: Poor (%)	20.9	15.8
Total (N)	67	19

C2j: College admin serve as advocate for college to univ	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	3.1
4: Excellent (%)	21.4	47.4
3: Good (%)	39.3	31.6
2: Fair (%)	23.2	5.3
1: Poor (%)	16.1	15.8
Total (N)	56	19

C2k: College admin support academic freedom	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.5
4: Excellent (%)	29.2	59.1
3: Good (%)	55.4	31.8
2: Fair (%)	10.8	9.1
1: Poor (%)	4.6	.
Total (N)	65	22

C2l: College admin make rational decisions	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	3.3
4: Excellent (%)	10.8	40.0
3: Good (%)	63.1	50.0
2: Fair (%)	20.0	10.0
1: Poor (%)	6.2	.
Total (N)	65	20

C2m: College admin make equitable decisions	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	3.2
4: Excellent (%)	9.7	42.1
3: Good (%)	58.1	36.8
2: Fair (%)	14.5	21.1
1: Poor (%)	17.7	.
Total (N)	62	19

C2n: College admin promote diversity within college	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.4	3.5
4: Excellent (%)	47.9	66.7
3: Good (%)	45.2	20.8
2: Fair (%)	5.5	8.3
1: Poor (%)	1.4	4.2
Total (N)	73	24

C3a: Univ admin communication with faculty	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.2	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	4.3	33.3
3: Good (%)	27.5	16.7
2: Fair (%)	53.6	38.9
1: Poor (%)	14.5	11.1
Total (N)	69	18

C3b: Univ admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.2	2.5
4: Excellent (%)	6.3	20.0
3: Good (%)	22.9	20.0
2: Fair (%)	58.3	46.7
1: Poor (%)	12.5	13.3
Total (N)	48	15

C3c: Univ admin set clear and explicit priorities	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	8.2	23.5
3: Good (%)	32.8	47.1
2: Fair (%)	45.9	23.5
1: Poor (%)	13.1	5.9
Total (N)	61	17

C3d: Univ admin serves as advocate for univ to constituents	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	3.2
4: Excellent (%)	9.8	41.2
3: Good (%)	54.9	35.3
2: Fair (%)	21.6	23.5
1: Poor (%)	13.7	.
Total (N)	51	17

C3e: Univ admin support academic freedom	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.4
4: Excellent (%)	24.6	59.1
3: Good (%)	54.1	27.3
2: Fair (%)	16.4	9.1
1: Poor (%)	4.9	4.5
Total (N)	61	22

C3f: Univ admin make rational decisions	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	3.1
4: Excellent (%)	5.5	31.6
3: Good (%)	45.5	57.9
2: Fair (%)	41.8	.
1: Poor (%)	7.3	10.5
Total (N)	55	19

C3g: Univ admin make equitable decisions	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.3	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	5.6	33.3
3: Good (%)	40.7	44.4
2: Fair (%)	29.6	11.1
1: Poor (%)	24.1	11.1
Total (N)	54	18

C3h: Univ admin promote diversity within university	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.4
4: Excellent (%)	20.6	59.1
3: Good (%)	65.1	22.7
2: Fair (%)	14.3	13.6
1: Poor (%)	.	4.5
Total (N)	63	22

Back to Top

Section D: Faculty-Administration Relationships

D1a: I am encouraged to give input on curricular issues	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.4	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	46.7	52.0
3: Agree (%)	44.4	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	6.7	8.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.2	.
Total (N)	90	25

D1b: I am encouraged to give input on prog assessment	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	27.0	48.0
3: Agree (%)	58.4	36.0
2: Disagree (%)	12.4	16.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.2	.
Total (N)	89	25

D1c: I am encouraged to give input on dept hiring	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	38.2	56.0
3: Agree (%)	42.7	36.0
2: Disagree (%)	15.7	4.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.4	4.0
Total (N)	89	25

D1d: I am encouraged to give input on college admin appointments	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	4.6	33.3
3: Agree (%)	40.2	16.7
2: Disagree (%)	43.7	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	11.5	16.7
Total (N)	87	24

D1e: I am encouraged to give input on university admin appointments	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.3	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	2.3	20.8
3: Agree (%)	38.4	25.0
2: Disagree (%)	43.0	37.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	16.3	16.7
Total (N)	86	24

D2: Familiarity with academic program assessment in dept	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	3.2
4: Very familiar (%)	28.1	40.0
3: Somewhat familiar (%)	43.8	44.0
2: Not very familiar (%)	20.2	8.0
1: Not at all familiar (%)	7.9	8.0
Total (N)	89	25

D3a: Understanding of resource allocation to university	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.3	2.3
4: Very well (%)	6.7	4.3
3: Fairly well (%)	36.0	39.1
2: Not very well (%)	41.6	43.5
1: Not at all (%)	15.7	13.0
Total (N)	89	23

D3b: Understanding of resource allocation to college	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.3	2.2
4: Very well (%)	4.5	4.3
3: Fairly well (%)	30.3	21.7
2: Not very well (%)	51.7	65.2
1: Not at all (%)	13.5	8.7
Total (N)	89	23

D3c: Understanding of resource allocation to department	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.5
4: Very well (%)	10.0	8.7
3: Fairly well (%)	41.1	39.1
2: Not very well (%)	37.8	47.8
1: Not at all (%)	11.1	4.3
Total (N)	90	23

D3d: Understanding of resource allocation within department	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8
4: Very well (%)	20.0	20.0
3: Fairly well (%)	47.8	48.0
2: Not very well (%)	24.4	28.0
1: Not at all (%)	7.8	4.0
Total (N)	90	25

D4: Faculty have sufficient input on dept resource allocation	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	8.0	20.0
3: Agree (%)	61.4	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	25.0	40.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.7	.
Total (N)	88	25

D5: Dept faculty searches/appointments are collegial and inclusive	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	40.4	56.0
3: Agree (%)	43.8	32.0
2: Disagree (%)	12.4	8.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.4	4.0
Total (N)	89	25

D6a: Relations between faculty in dept and dept admin	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.6
4: Excellent (%)	37.5	64.0
3: Good (%)	43.2	32.0
2: Fair (%)	10.2	4.0
1: Poor (%)	9.1	.
Total (N)	88	25

D6b: Relations between faculty in dept and college admin	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	11.4	40.9
3: Good (%)	54.4	31.8
2: Fair (%)	20.3	18.2
1: Poor (%)	13.9	9.1
Total (N)	79	22

D6c: Relations between faculty in dept and univ admin	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	1.8	26.3
3: Good (%)	50.9	31.6
2: Fair (%)	36.8	26.3
1: Poor (%)	10.5	15.8
Total (N)	57	19

D6d: Relations between all faculty and univ admin	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	1.9	26.3
3: Good (%)	50.0	36.8
2: Fair (%)	37.0	26.3
1: Poor (%)	11.1	10.5
Total (N)	54	19

D7a: Faculty Senate effective commun between faculty and univ admin	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	2.2	16.7
3: Agree (%)	56.5	61.1
2: Disagree (%)	26.1	11.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	15.2	11.1
Total (N)	46	18

D7b: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty in general	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	2.2	13.3
3: Agree (%)	60.0	46.7
2: Disagree (%)	26.7	26.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	11.1	13.3
Total (N)	45	15

D7c: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty like me	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.2	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	12.5
3: Agree (%)	44.2	37.5
2: Disagree (%)	34.9	37.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	20.9	12.5
Total (N)	43	16

D8: Effectiveness of university grievance procedures	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	3.1
4: Very effective (%)	12.0	27.3
3: Somewhat effective (%)	64.0	63.6
2: Not very effective (%)	16.0	.
1: Not at all effective (%)	8.0	9.1
Total (N)	25	11

D9: Importance of "ombuds" for informal conflict resolution	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	3.3
4: Very important (%)	43.5	50.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	41.2	33.3
2: Not very important (%)	14.1	8.3
1: Not at all important (%)	1.2	8.3
Total (N)	85	24

Back to Top

Section E: Diversity/Multiculturalism

E1: Importance of institutional emphasis on diversity/Multiculturalism	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	3.5
4: Very important (%)	43.2	60.9
3: Somewhat important (%)	39.8	34.8
2: Not very important (%)	10.2	.
1: Not at all important (%)	6.8	4.3
Total (N)	88	23

E2: Importance of diversity to enhanced learning in own classroom	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	3.2
4: Very important (%)	12.6	43.5
3: Somewhat important (%)	41.4	39.1
2: Not very important (%)	34.5	8.7
1: Not at all important (%)	11.5	8.7
Total (N)	87	23

E3: NCSU prepares students to live and work in diverse society	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.4	25.0
3: Agree (%)	77.9	55.0
2: Disagree (%)	11.7	20.0
Total (N)	77	20

E4a: My dept recruits historically underrepresented students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.4	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	42.7	72.7
3: Agree (%)	52.4	18.2
2: Disagree (%)	3.7	9.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.2	.
Total (N)	82	22

E4b: My dept retains historically underrepresented students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	37.2	60.0
3: Agree (%)	56.4	30.0
2: Disagree (%)	5.1	10.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.3	.
Total (N)	78	20

E4c: My dept supports historically underrepresented students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	38.4	60.0
3: Agree (%)	52.1	30.0
2: Disagree (%)	8.2	10.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.4	.
Total (N)	73	20

E4d: My dept recruits historically underrepresented faculty	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	37.6	52.4
3: Agree (%)	57.6	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	4.7	9.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	4.8
Total (N)	85	21

E4e: My dept retains historically underrepresented faculty	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	39.4	45.0
3: Agree (%)	53.0	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	6.1	5.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.5	.
Total (N)	66	20

E4f: My dept supports historically underrepresented faculty	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	37.9	47.4
3: Agree (%)	53.0	42.1
2: Disagree (%)	9.1	10.5
Total (N)	66	19

E5a: Dept environ accepting/respectful of age	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	44.6	61.9
3: Agree (%)	45.8	38.1
2: Disagree (%)	4.8	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.8	.
Total (N)	83	21

E5b: Dept environ accepting/respectful of disability status	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	49.0	62.5
3: Agree (%)	51.0	31.3
2: Disagree (%)	.	6.3
Total (N)	51	16

E5c: Dept environ accepting/respectful of gender	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	42.7	68.2
3: Agree (%)	47.6	31.8
2: Disagree (%)	9.8	.
Total (N)	82	22

E5d: Dept environ accepting/respectful of military status	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.4	3.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	48.8	75.0
3: Agree (%)	46.5	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.7	.
Total (N)	43	12

E5e: Dept environ accepting/respectful of nationality/ethnic origin	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	51.9	63.6
3: Agree (%)	48.1	27.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	9.1
Total (N)	81	22

E5f: Dept environ accepting/respectful of race and color	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	50.6	63.6
3: Agree (%)	49.4	27.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	9.1
Total (N)	77	22

E5g: Dept environ accepting/respectful of religion	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	50.0	66.7
3: Agree (%)	48.4	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.6	.
Total (N)	64	15

E5h: Dept environ accepting/respectful of sexual orientation	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	3.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	45.2	81.8
3: Agree (%)	42.9	18.2
2: Disagree (%)	7.1	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.8	.
Total (N)	42	11

E6a: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of age	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	3.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	56.3	76.2
3: Agree (%)	41.3	23.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.5	.
Total (N)	80	21

E6b: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of disability status	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	3.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	55.7	77.8
3: Agree (%)	42.6	22.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.6	.
Total (N)	61	18

E6c: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of gender	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	3.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	53.2	76.2
3: Agree (%)	45.6	23.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.3	.
Total (N)	79	21

E6d: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of military status	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	3.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	52.8	84.6
3: Agree (%)	43.4	15.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.8	.
Total (N)	53	13

E6e: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of national/ethnic origin	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	55.7	71.4
3: Agree (%)	43.0	23.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.3	4.8
Total (N)	79	21

E6f: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of race and color	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	56.0	71.4
3: Agree (%)	42.7	23.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.3	4.8
Total (N)	75	21

E6g: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of religion	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	3.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	54.9	76.5
3: Agree (%)	43.7	23.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.4	.
Total (N)	71	17

E6h: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of sexual orientation	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.4	3.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	54.5	91.7
3: Agree (%)	34.5	8.3
2: Disagree (%)	7.3	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.6	.
Total (N)	55	12

E7: Faculty diversity/multiculturalism enhancement of intellectual diversity in dept	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	3.0
4: A great deal (%)	14.1	39.1
3: Some (%)	50.6	34.8
2: A little (%)	14.1	8.7
1: Not at all (%)	21.2	17.4
Total (N)	85	23

E8: Inclusion of diversity-related topics, scholarship, etc in your courses	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	1.8	2.0
4: A great deal (%)	3.7	5.9
3: Some (%)	18.5	35.3
2: A little (%)	28.4	11.8
1: Not at all (%)	49.4	47.1
Total (N)	81	17

E9a: Interest in research, extension, art endeavors outside U.S.	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.4
4: A great deal (%)	42.0	60.9
3: Some (%)	34.1	21.7
2: A little (%)	8.0	13.0
1: None (%)	15.9	4.3
Total (N)	88	23

E9b: Interest in teaching study abroad	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	2.7
4: A great deal (%)	19.3	39.1
3: Some (%)	29.5	17.4
2: A little (%)	18.2	13.0
1: None (%)	33.0	30.4
Total (N)	88	23

E9c: Interest in participating in spring break service learning	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	1.5	1.8
4: A great deal (%)	3.4	13.6
3: Some (%)	12.6	9.1
2: A little (%)	16.1	18.2
1: None (%)	67.8	59.1
Total (N)	87	22

E9d: Interest in participating in international service projects	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.0	2.8
4: A great deal (%)	10.5	31.8
3: Some (%)	23.3	36.4
2: A little (%)	22.1	13.6
1: None (%)	44.2	18.2
Total (N)	86	22

E9e: Interest in teaching in international studies major	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	1.5	2.0
4: A great deal (%)	1.1	13.6
3: Some (%)	13.8	31.8
2: A little (%)	19.5	.
1: None (%)	65.5	54.5
Total (N)	87	22

E9f: Interest in advising international students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	3.5
4: A great deal (%)	13.8	52.2
3: Some (%)	43.7	43.5
2: A little (%)	20.7	4.3
1: None (%)	21.8	.
Total (N)	87	23

Back to Top

Section F: Working Relationships

F1: There is unity/cohesion among faculty in my department	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	14.9	39.1
3: Agree (%)	48.3	39.1
2: Disagree (%)	32.2	13.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.6	8.7
Total (N)	87	23

F2a: Good communication between my students and me	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	3.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	48.8	78.3
3: Agree (%)	51.2	21.7
Total (N)	86	23

F2b: Good communication between dept and our students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	16.7	57.1
3: Agree (%)	78.6	38.1
2: Disagree (%)	4.8	4.8
Total (N)	84	21

F2c: Good communication between faculty in my dept	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	13.8	47.8
3: Agree (%)	63.2	39.1
2: Disagree (%)	20.7	8.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.3	4.3
Total (N)	87	23

F2d: Good communication between my dept and other depts	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	1.5	25.0
3: Agree (%)	55.4	56.3
2: Disagree (%)	35.4	18.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.7	.
Total (N)	65	16

F2e: Good communication between my college and other colleges	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	4.3	23.1
3: Agree (%)	53.2	61.5
2: Disagree (%)	31.9	15.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	10.6	.
Total (N)	47	13

F3: Dept environ promotes respectful dialogue between diverse perspectives	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	28.2	63.6
3: Agree (%)	61.2	31.8
2: Disagree (%)	8.2	4.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.4	.
Total (N)	85	22

F4a: Frequency given/recvd teaching advice in dept past few years	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.1
Frequently (%)	38.6	17.4
Sometimes (%)	43.2	78.3
Seldom (%)	9.1	.
Never (%)	9.1	4.3
Total (N)	88	23

F4b: Frequency given/recvd research/artistic feedback in dept past few yrs	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.1
Frequently (%)	32.6	34.8
Sometimes (%)	40.7	47.8
Seldom (%)	16.3	13.0
Never (%)	10.5	4.3
Total (N)	86	23

F4c: Frequency given/recvd help with dept/college bureaucracy past few yrs	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	2.7
Frequently (%)	29.5	21.7
Sometimes (%)	47.7	34.8
Seldom (%)	20.5	34.8
Never (%)	2.3	8.7
Total (N)	88	23

F4d: Frequency given/recvd help undrsnd reappointment, promotion, tenure past few yrs	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0
Frequently (%)	25.0	21.7
Sometimes (%)	53.4	56.5
Seldom (%)	13.6	17.4
Never (%)	8.0	4.3
Total (N)	88	23

F4e: Frequency given/recvd help with work/personal balance issues past few yrs	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.2	2.1
Frequently (%)	12.5	8.7
Sometimes (%)	27.3	21.7
Seldom (%)	23.9	39.1
Never (%)	36.4	30.4
Total (N)	88	23

F5a: Frequency of collab with faculty in your dept	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	3.5
Frequently (%)	55.2	56.5
Sometimes (%)	31.0	34.8
Seldom (%)	6.9	8.7
Never (%)	6.9	.
Total (N)	87	23

F5b: Frequency of collab with faculty in other NCSU depts	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.5
Frequently (%)	35.6	21.7
Sometimes (%)	26.4	34.8
Seldom (%)	17.2	17.4
Never (%)	20.7	26.1
Total (N)	87	23

F5c: Frequency of collab with faculty from other universities	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	3.5
Frequently (%)	59.8	65.2
Sometimes (%)	24.1	26.1
Seldom (%)	6.9	4.3
Never (%)	9.2	4.3
Total (N)	87	23

F5d: Frequency of collab with non-faculty external to NCSU	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	2.6
Frequently (%)	20.7	26.1
Sometimes (%)	24.1	30.4
Seldom (%)	25.3	17.4
Never (%)	29.9	26.1
Total (N)	87	23

Back to Top

Section G: Faculty Support & Professional Development

G1a: Satisfaction with level of courses	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.4	3.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	47.6	60.9
3: Satisfied (%)	45.2	26.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	4.8	8.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.4	4.3
Total (N)	84	23

G1b: Satisfaction with number of courses	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	34.9	43.5
3: Satisfied (%)	48.2	43.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	14.5	13.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.4	.
Total (N)	83	23

G1c: Satisfaction with choice in courses	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	3.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	44.6	65.2
3: Satisfied (%)	47.0	30.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	4.8	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	3.6	4.3
Total (N)	83	23

G1d: Satisfaction with course content discretion	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	3.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	55.4	78.3
3: Satisfied (%)	41.0	21.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	3.6	.
Total (N)	83	23

G1e: Satisfaction with number of students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	27.4	47.8
3: Satisfied (%)	54.8	47.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	13.1	4.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	4.8	.
Total (N)	84	23

G1f: Satisfaction with quality of undergraduates	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	14.6	15.0
3: Satisfied (%)	54.9	60.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	23.2	25.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	7.3	.
Total (N)	82	20

G1g: Satisfaction with quality of graduate students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	17.1	13.0
3: Satisfied (%)	63.4	69.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	18.3	17.4
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	1.2	.
Total (N)	82	23

G1h: Satisfaction with access to grad TAs	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	12.7	39.1
3: Satisfied (%)	59.5	52.2
2: Dissatisfied (%)	19.0	4.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	8.9	4.3
Total (N)	79	23

G1i: Satisfaction with access to grad RAs	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	14.1	38.1
3: Satisfied (%)	60.9	57.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	18.8	4.8
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.3	.
Total (N)	64	21

G2a: NCSU supports innovative teaching	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	26.3	36.4
3: Agree (%)	57.5	59.1
2: Disagree (%)	15.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.3	4.5
Total (N)	80	22

G2b: NCSU supports innovative research and scholarly activity	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	32.5	40.0
3: Agree (%)	51.9	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	15.6	.
Total (N)	77	20

G2c: NCSU supports innovative creative artistry and literature	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.0	50.0
3: Agree (%)	37.5	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	25.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	12.5	.
Total (N)	16	4

G2d: NCSU supports innovative extension/engagement/econ dev activity	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	12.8	40.0
3: Agree (%)	66.7	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	20.5	.
Total (N)	39	10

G3a: NCSU rewards innovative teaching	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.3	27.3
3: Agree (%)	42.3	59.1
2: Disagree (%)	39.7	4.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.7	9.1
Total (N)	78	22

G3b: NCSU rewards innovative research and scholarly activity	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	34.2	36.4
3: Agree (%)	48.1	40.9
2: Disagree (%)	16.5	13.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.3	9.1
Total (N)	79	22

G3c: NCSU rewards innovative creative artistry and literature	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	14.3	50.0
3: Agree (%)	50.0	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	28.6	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.1	.
Total (N)	14	4

G3d: NCSU rewards innovative extension/engagement/econ dev activity	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	5.4	22.2
3: Agree (%)	59.5	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	24.3	11.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	10.8	.
Total (N)	37	9

G4a: Satisfaction: Availability of classroom technology	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	21.2	40.9
3: Satisfied (%)	52.9	40.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	17.6	4.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	8.2	13.6
Total (N)	85	22

G4b: Satisfaction: Teaching reduction for scholarly/prof growth	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	11.1	23.8
3: Satisfied (%)	41.7	52.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	31.9	14.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	15.3	9.5
Total (N)	72	21

G4c: Satisfaction: Teaching workshop/seminar opportunities	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	14.5	27.8
3: Satisfied (%)	80.3	72.2
2: Dissatisfied (%)	3.9	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	1.3	.
Total (N)	76	18

G4d: Satisfaction: Avail of funds to attend teaching conference/wrkshp	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	7.4	21.4
3: Satisfied (%)	44.4	78.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	27.8	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	20.4	.
Total (N)	54	14

G4e: Satisfaction: Learning technology training/support	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	14.9	23.5
3: Satisfied (%)	67.6	64.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	12.2	11.8
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.4	.
Total (N)	74	17

G4f: Satisfaction: Campus bookstore meeting course needs	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	20.8	15.8
3: Satisfied (%)	70.8	78.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	6.9	5.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	1.4	.
Total (N)	72	19

G4g: Satisfaction: Availability of funds to present work	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.3	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	8.2	23.8
3: Satisfied (%)	38.4	61.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	32.9	14.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	20.5	.
Total (N)	73	21

G4h: Satisfaction: Opportunities for scholarly/professional leave	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	8.6	20.0
3: Satisfied (%)	45.7	65.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	27.1	10.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	18.6	5.0
Total (N)	70	20

G4i: Satisfaction: Financial support for scholarly/professional leave	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	9.1	21.1
3: Satisfied (%)	39.4	47.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	31.8	26.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	19.7	5.3
Total (N)	66	19

G4j: Satisfaction: Leadership development opportunities	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	2.4	17.6
3: Satisfied (%)	58.5	64.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	29.3	5.9
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	9.8	11.8
Total (N)	41	17

G4k: Satisfaction: Support for dept assessment activities	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	5.6	31.3
3: Satisfied (%)	64.8	56.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	20.4	6.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	9.3	6.3
Total (N)	54	16

G4l: Satisfaction: Availability of/access to materials via NCSU Libraries	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	3.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	34.1	54.5
3: Satisfied (%)	61.0	45.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	4.9	.
Total (N)	82	22

G4m: Satisfaction: Support with dealing with student concerns	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	16.7	29.4
3: Satisfied (%)	69.4	70.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	11.1	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.8	.
Total (N)	72	17

G4n: Satisfaction: Support for technology transfer	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.8	30.8
3: Satisfied (%)	61.4	46.2
2: Dissatisfied (%)	25.0	7.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.8	15.4
Total (N)	44	13

G5: Assignment of formal mentor	White	Faculty of Color
Yes (%)	21.8	38.1
No (%)	75.9	61.9
Don't know (%)	2.3	.
Total (N)	87	21

G6: Mentor helpfulness	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	3.6
4: Very helpful (%)	42.1	62.5
3: Somewhat helpful (%)	15.8	37.5
2: Not very helpful (%)	31.6	.
1: Not at all helpful (%)	10.5	.
Total (N)	19	8

G7a: Satisfaction: Pre-award support from college for grant/contract	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	29.4	28.6
3: Satisfied (%)	52.9	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	8.8	4.8
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	8.8	.
Total (N)	68	21

G7b: Satisfaction: Post-award support from college for grant/contract	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	13.4	15.0
3: Satisfied (%)	56.7	65.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	17.9	10.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	11.9	10.0
Total (N)	67	20

G7c: Satisfaction: Pre-award University support for grant/contract	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	9.4	25.0
3: Satisfied (%)	62.3	56.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	20.8	18.8
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	7.5	.
Total (N)	53	16

G7d: Satisfaction: Post-award University support for grant/contract	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	7.1	13.3
3: Satisfied (%)	53.6	46.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	28.6	20.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	10.7	20.0
Total (N)	56	15

G7e: Satisfaction: Allocation of indirect grant costs to investigator	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	1.7	2.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	1.5	14.3
3: Satisfied (%)	24.2	21.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	18.2	14.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	56.1	50.0
Total (N)	66	14

G7f: Satisfaction: Allocation of indirect grant costs to department	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	1.7	1.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	1.6	.
3: Satisfied (%)	19.0	27.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	27.0	18.2
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	52.4	54.5
Total (N)	63	11

G7g: Satisfaction: PI control over indirect cost allocation	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	1.6	2.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	1.5	20.0
3: Satisfied (%)	16.9	26.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	20.0	20.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	61.5	33.3
Total (N)	65	15

H1: Faculty performance review standards are clearly stated	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.6	36.4
3: Agree (%)	54.7	54.5
2: Disagree (%)	17.4	9.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.3	.
Total (N)	86	22

H2: Faculty performance review procedures are clearly stated	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	27.9	50.0
3: Agree (%)	59.3	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	9.3	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.5	.
Total (N)	86	22

H3: SME is consistent with departmental vision	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	26.9	50.0
3: Agree (%)	68.7	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	3.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.5	.
Total (N)	67	20

H4: SME is consistent with departmental promotion standards	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	31.1	50.0
3: Agree (%)	65.6	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	1.6	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.6	.
Total (N)	61	20

H5a: Performance Review feedback appropriately based on SME	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	20.4	50.0
3: Agree (%)	64.8	45.0
2: Disagree (%)	13.0	5.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.9	.
Total (N)	54	20

H5b: Performance Review feedback helpful for professional Development	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	12.7	28.6
3: Agree (%)	50.8	61.9
2: Disagree (%)	31.7	9.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.8	.
Total (N)	63	21

H5c: Performance Review feedback corresponds with my perceptions of own performance	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	20.0	42.9
3: Agree (%)	61.5	47.6
2: Disagree (%)	12.3	9.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.2	.
Total (N)	65	21

H5d: Performance Review feedback helps understand relation to other faculty	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	9.4	28.6
3: Agree (%)	51.6	42.9
2: Disagree (%)	29.7	28.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.4	.
Total (N)	64	21

H5e: Feedback given appropriate weight in merit raises	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	11.3	28.6
3: Agree (%)	66.1	52.4
2: Disagree (%)	14.5	19.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.1	.
Total (N)	62	21

H6: Understanding of current Academic Tenure Policy	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.9
4: Very well (%)	17.6	18.2
3: Fairly well (%)	50.6	54.5
2: Not very well (%)	17.6	27.3
1: Not at all (%)	14.1	.
Total (N)	85	22

H7_1: Participated in RPT process as candidate	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	46.5	45.5
Yes (%)	53.5	54.5
Total (N)	86	22

H7_2: Participated in RPT process as voter	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	37.2	27.3
Yes (%)	62.8	72.7
Total (N)	86	22

H7_3: Participated in RPT process as review committee member	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	58.1	72.7
Yes (%)	41.9	27.3
Total (N)	86	22

H7_4: Have never participated in RPT process	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	81.4	95.5
Yes (%)	18.6	4.5
Total (N)	86	22

H8: Understand dept RPT standards	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	3.4
4: Very well (%)	41.2	40.9
3: Fairly well (%)	37.6	54.5
2: Not very well (%)	16.5	4.5
1: Not at all (%)	4.7	.
Total (N)	85	22

H9: Understand dept RPT procedures	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	3.4
4: Very well (%)	45.2	45.5
3: Fairly well (%)	40.5	50.0
2: Not very well (%)	10.7	4.5
1: Not at all (%)	3.6	.
Total (N)	84	22

Back to Top

Section H: Performance Review, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure

H10: Departmental RPT standards applied consistently/fairly	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	22.9	35.0
3: Agree (%)	60.0	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	14.3	5.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.9	.
Total (N)	70	20

H11: Departmental RPT procedures applied consistently/fairly	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	29.2	35.0
3: Agree (%)	54.2	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	13.9	5.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.8	.
Total (N)	72	20

H12a: Sufficient resources for teaching/mentoring students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	6.7	35.0
3: Agree (%)	54.7	55.0
2: Disagree (%)	30.7	10.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.0	.
Total (N)	75	20

H12b: Sufficient resources for discovery of knowledge	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	3.1	18.8
3: Agree (%)	56.9	56.3
2: Disagree (%)	27.7	18.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	12.3	6.3
Total (N)	65	16

H12c: Sufficient resources for creative artistry and literature	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	50.0
3: Agree (%)	63.6	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	27.3	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.1	.
Total (N)	11	4

H12d: Sufficient resources for tech/managerial innovation	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	5.1	18.2
3: Agree (%)	56.4	63.6
2: Disagree (%)	28.2	9.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	10.3	9.1
Total (N)	39	11

H12e: Sufficient resources for extension/engagement	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	3.0	30.0
3: Agree (%)	69.7	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	12.1	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	15.2	10.0
Total (N)	33	10

H12f: Sufficient resources for professional service	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	5.5	31.3
3: Agree (%)	50.9	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	34.5	18.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.1	.
Total (N)	55	16

H13a: Department rewards teaching/mentoring of students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	9.2	33.3
3: Agree (%)	53.9	52.4
2: Disagree (%)	30.3	9.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.6	4.8
Total (N)	76	21

H13b: Department rewards discovery of knowledge	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	27.7	50.0
3: Agree (%)	58.5	37.5
2: Disagree (%)	12.3	12.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.5	.
Total (N)	65	16

H13c: Department rewards creative artistry and literature	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.3	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	18.2	20.0
3: Agree (%)	27.3	80.0
2: Disagree (%)	18.2	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	36.4	.
Total (N)	11	5

H13d: Department rewards tech/managerial innovation	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	8.1	30.0
3: Agree (%)	62.2	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	21.6	10.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.1	.
Total (N)	37	10

H13e: Department rewards extension/engagement	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	9.3	40.0
3: Agree (%)	55.8	46.7
2: Disagree (%)	20.9	13.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	14.0	.
Total (N)	43	15

H13f: Department rewards professional service	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	9.2	27.8
3: Agree (%)	60.0	61.1
2: Disagree (%)	27.7	11.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.1	.
Total (N)	65	18

Back to Top

Section I: Post-Tenure Review

I1_1: No experience with PTR	White	Faculty of Color
Has experience (%)	68.4	63.6
No experience (%)	31.6	36.4
Total (N)	76	22

I1_2: Have had PTR Comprehensive Review	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	43.4	45.5
Yes (%)	56.6	54.5
Total (N)	76	22

I1_3: Have served on PTR committee	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	69.7	63.6
Yes (%)	30.3	36.4
Total (N)	76	22

I1_4: Have been dept/college administrator in PTR process	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	90.8	95.5
Yes (%)	9.2	4.5
Total (N)	76	22

I1_5: Had other PTR experience	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	98.7	95.5
Yes (%)	1.3	4.5
Total (N)	76	22

I2a: Easy to find PTR information on NCSU website	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	6.3	22.2
3: Agree (%)	72.9	72.2
2: Disagree (%)	16.7	5.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.2	.
Total (N)	48	18

I2b: PTR process known/understood in department	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	9.1	29.4
3: Agree (%)	65.5	58.8
2: Disagree (%)	23.6	11.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.8	.
Total (N)	55	17

I2c: Departmental PTR procedures are clear	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	11.1	27.8
3: Agree (%)	74.1	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	13.0	5.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.9	.
Total (N)	54	18

I2d: Departmental PTR standards are clear	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	9.3	23.5
3: Agree (%)	64.8	58.8
2: Disagree (%)	22.2	11.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.7	5.9
Total (N)	54	17

I2e: Departmental PTR procedures are followed equitably	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	20.0	25.0
3: Agree (%)	77.8	75.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.2	.
Total (N)	45	16

I2f: Departmental PTR standards are applied fairly	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	20.5	28.6
3: Agree (%)	77.3	64.3
2: Disagree (%)	.	7.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.3	.
Total (N)	44	14

I2g: Dept PTR committee members are well prepared and trained	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.8	26.7
3: Agree (%)	67.6	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	16.2	13.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.4	.
Total (N)	37	15

I3: Overall satisfaction with PTR process	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	5.9	20.0
3: Satisfied (%)	58.8	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	17.6	13.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	17.6	.
Total (N)	51	15

Back to Top

Section J: Pay and Compensation

J1a: My salary is competitive within my department	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	9.1	10.5
3: Agree (%)	54.5	52.6
2: Disagree (%)	24.2	31.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	12.1	5.3
Total (N)	66	19

J1b: My salary is competitive within my college	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	2.4	6.7
3: Agree (%)	52.4	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	28.6	40.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	16.7	20.0
Total (N)	42	15

J1c: My salary is competitive within NC State	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.3	2.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	2.3	6.7
3: Agree (%)	48.8	26.7
2: Disagree (%)	30.2	46.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	18.6	20.0
Total (N)	43	15

J1d: My salary is competitive within UNC system	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.1	2.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	7.7
3: Agree (%)	34.9	30.8
2: Disagree (%)	37.2	30.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	27.9	30.8
Total (N)	43	13

J1e: My salary is competitive within discipline at comparable institutions	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	1.9	2.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	1.7	11.8
3: Agree (%)	26.7	11.8
2: Disagree (%)	35.0	47.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	36.7	29.4
Total (N)	60	17

J2: Understand how faculty salaries determined	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.5
4: Very well (%)	19.0	9.1
3: Fairly well (%)	41.7	54.5
2: Not very well (%)	15.5	18.2
1: Not at all (%)	23.8	18.2
Total (N)	84	22

J3: My department links salary increase to meritorious performance	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	20.8	25.0
3: Agree (%)	56.9	65.0
2: Disagree (%)	15.3	10.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.9	.
Total (N)	72	20

J4: I have access to benefits information	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	24.4	54.5
3: Agree (%)	68.3	40.9
2: Disagree (%)	6.1	4.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.2	.
Total (N)	82	22

J5: Healthcare benefits are competitive with other institutions	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.0	2.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	2.9	16.7
3: Agree (%)	26.1	22.2
2: Disagree (%)	34.8	27.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	36.2	33.3
Total (N)	69	18

J6: Retirement programs are competitive with other institutions	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	4.9	20.0
3: Agree (%)	49.2	26.7
2: Disagree (%)	31.1	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	14.8	33.3
Total (N)	61	15

J7: Voluntary benefits programs are competitive with other institutions	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	14.3
3: Agree (%)	69.0	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	16.7	14.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	14.3	21.4
Total (N)	42	14

J8: I am satisfied with my compensation at NC State	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	3.7	9.1
3: Agree (%)	50.0	45.5
2: Disagree (%)	37.8	36.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.5	9.1
Total (N)	82	22

J9: Departmental environment enables work/personal life balance	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.1	38.1
3: Agree (%)	59.5	47.6
2: Disagree (%)	20.3	4.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	10.1	9.5
Total (N)	79	21

J10: NCSU environment enables work/personal life balance	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	2.6	19.0
3: Agree (%)	69.2	61.9
2: Disagree (%)	16.7	9.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	11.5	9.5
Total (N)	78	21

J11a: Importance of flexible work hours	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.6	3.8
4: Very important (%)	73.2	81.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	18.3	14.3
2: Not very important (%)	3.7	4.8
1: Not at all important (%)	4.9	.
Total (N)	82	21

J11b: Importance of maternity/paternity leave	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.6	3.7
4: Very important (%)	72.8	76.2
3: Somewhat important (%)	21.0	19.0
2: Not very important (%)	2.5	4.8
1: Not at all important (%)	3.7	.
Total (N)	81	21

J11c: Importance of family leave time	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.6	3.7
4: Very important (%)	69.1	70.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	24.7	30.0
2: Not very important (%)	4.9	.
1: Not at all important (%)	1.2	.
Total (N)	81	20

J11d: Importance of altering tenure clock for family concerns	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.6	3.7
4: Very important (%)	69.1	76.2
3: Somewhat important (%)	22.2	14.3
2: Not very important (%)	6.2	9.5
1: Not at all important (%)	2.5	.
Total (N)	81	21

J11e: Importance of childcare facility on or near campus	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	3.6
4: Very important (%)	48.1	66.7
3: Somewhat important (%)	35.8	28.6
2: Not very important (%)	9.9	4.8
1: Not at all important (%)	6.2	.
Total (N)	81	21

J11f: Importance of tuition remission for dependents	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	3.7
4: Very important (%)	54.3	77.3
3: Somewhat important (%)	25.9	13.6
2: Not very important (%)	13.6	9.1
1: Not at all important (%)	6.2	.
Total (N)	81	22

Back to Top

Section K: Campus Infrastructure/Physical Environment

K1: I have sufficient clerical/admin support in my dept	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	14.3	27.3
3: Agree (%)	41.7	45.5
2: Disagree (%)	29.8	27.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	14.3	.
Total (N)	84	22

K2: I have sufficient tech assistance	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	11.9	31.8
3: Agree (%)	40.5	45.5
2: Disagree (%)	33.3	22.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	14.3	.
Total (N)	84	22

K3: There is sufficient support staff in my college	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	8.5	28.6
3: Agree (%)	50.0	52.4
2: Disagree (%)	25.6	19.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	15.9	.
Total (N)	82	21

K4a: Satisfaction with office space	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	34.5	36.4
3: Satisfied (%)	47.6	54.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	14.3	4.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	3.6	4.5
Total (N)	84	22

K4b: Satisfaction with lab space	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	22.0	40.0
3: Satisfied (%)	46.3	40.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	22.0	20.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	9.8	.
Total (N)	41	5

K4c: Satisfaction with classrooms in which you teach	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	4.9	18.2
3: Satisfied (%)	45.1	59.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	37.8	9.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	12.2	13.6
Total (N)	82	22

K4d: Satisfaction with labs in which you teach	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	17.1	33.3
3: Satisfied (%)	42.9	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	34.3	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.7	.
Total (N)	35	6

K4e: Satisfaction with maintenance of building in which you work	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	10.8	14.3
3: Satisfied (%)	42.2	38.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	27.7	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	19.3	14.3
Total (N)	83	21

K4f: Satisfaction with infrastructure of bldgs in which you work	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.3	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	7.2	13.6
3: Satisfied (%)	37.3	40.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	37.3	31.8
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	18.1	13.6
Total (N)	83	22

K4g: Satisfaction with availability of up-to-date equipment	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	10.0	25.0
3: Satisfied (%)	52.5	35.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	21.3	30.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	16.3	10.0
Total (N)	80	20

K4h: Satisfaction with availability of office supplies	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	13.4	40.9
3: Satisfied (%)	72.0	31.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	9.8	22.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	4.9	4.5
Total (N)	82	22

K4i: Satisfaction with availability of informal meeting space	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	9.8	28.6
3: Satisfied (%)	42.7	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	34.1	23.8
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	13.4	14.3
Total (N)	82	21

K4j: Satisfaction with dining options on campus	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.2	2.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	3.2	11.1
3: Satisfied (%)	33.3	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	41.3	44.4
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	22.2	11.1
Total (N)	63	18

K4k: Satisfaction with availability of parking	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	5.0	9.1
3: Satisfied (%)	55.0	40.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	25.0	36.4
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	15.0	13.6
Total (N)	80	22

K4l: Satisfaction with cost of parking	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.2	2.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	3.8	4.8
3: Satisfied (%)	38.8	47.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	30.0	23.8
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	27.5	23.8
Total (N)	80	21

K4m: Satisfaction with Wolfline	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.1	40.0
3: Satisfied (%)	66.7	40.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	27.3	20.0
Total (N)	33	5

K4n: Satisfaction with commute between Centennial and main	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.1	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	3.9	21.4
3: Satisfied (%)	29.4	35.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	41.2	21.4
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	25.5	21.4
Total (N)	51	14

K4o: Satisfaction with campus safety	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	4.2	11.1
3: Satisfied (%)	80.6	61.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	11.1	22.2
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	4.2	5.6
Total (N)	72	18

K4p: Satisfaction with campus aesthetics	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	2.5	10.0
3: Satisfied (%)	51.9	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	38.0	30.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	7.6	10.0
Total (N)	79	20

K4q: Satisfaction with upkeep of campus grounds	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.3	10.5
3: Satisfied (%)	74.7	68.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	16.5	15.8
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.5	5.3
Total (N)	79	19

K4r: Satisfaction with amount of green space	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	1.3	9.1
3: Satisfied (%)	58.2	54.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	34.2	22.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.3	13.6
Total (N)	79	22

K5a: Satisfaction with energy conservation	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	1.6	15.8
3: Satisfied (%)	64.5	52.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	27.4	26.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.5	5.3
Total (N)	62	19

K5b: Satisfaction with water conservation	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	1.9	17.6
3: Satisfied (%)	71.2	70.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	25.0	11.8
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	1.9	.
Total (N)	52	17

K5c: Satisfaction with recycling efforts	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	14.9	26.3
3: Satisfied (%)	74.3	63.2
2: Dissatisfied (%)	6.8	10.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	4.1	.
Total (N)	74	19

K5d: Satisfaction with alternative transportation	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	3.4	15.4
3: Satisfied (%)	64.4	46.2
2: Dissatisfied (%)	28.8	30.8
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	3.4	7.7
Total (N)	59	13

K5e: Satisfaction with green building practices	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	2.6	12.5
3: Satisfied (%)	60.5	62.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	34.2	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.6	25.0
Total (N)	38	8

K5f: Satisfaction with use of recycled-content resources	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	5.6	16.7
3: Satisfied (%)	75.0	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	19.4	8.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	8.3
Total (N)	36	12

K6: Interest in hotel/conference center on Centennial Campus	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	3.1
4: A lot (%)	21.0	50.0
3: Some (%)	33.3	31.8
2: A little (%)	22.2	.
1: None at all (%)	23.5	18.2
Total (N)	81	22

K7: Likelihood of using conference center on Centennial Campus	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	3.2
4: Very likely (%)	22.2	45.5
3: Somewhat likely (%)	34.6	36.4
2: Not very likely (%)	28.4	13.6
1: Not at all likely (%)	14.8	4.5
Total (N)	81	22

Back to Top

Section L: Recreation/Wellness

L1: Satisfaction with recreation activities on campus	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	17.1	10.0
3: Satisfied (%)	68.3	80.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	13.4	10.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	1.2	.
Total (N)	82	20

L2: Satisfaction with cultural activities on campus	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	3.8	10.0
3: Satisfied (%)	67.5	65.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	25.0	20.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	3.8	5.0
Total (N)	80	20

L3a: Satisfaction with Carmichael Gymnasium	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	24.1	15.4
3: Satisfied (%)	62.1	61.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	12.1	23.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	1.7	.
Total (N)	58	13

L3b: Satisfaction with recreation space around campus	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	15.1	15.4
3: Satisfied (%)	67.9	69.2
2: Dissatisfied (%)	17.0	7.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	7.7
Total (N)	53	13

L3c: Satisfaction with organized Campus Recreation activities	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	7.1	25.0
3: Satisfied (%)	82.1	75.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	10.7	.
Total (N)	28	8

L3d: Satisfaction with ARTS NC State programs	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	8.2	20.0
3: Satisfied (%)	73.5	70.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	16.3	10.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.0	.
Total (N)	49	10

L3e: Satisfaction with Wolfpack athletic events	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	3.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	11.4	40.0
3: Satisfied (%)	70.5	60.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	6.8	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	11.4	.
Total (N)	44	10

L4a: How often use Carmichael Gymnasium	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.4	3.1
Once a week or more (%)	33.3	23.8
A few times a month (%)	8.6	14.3
A few times a semester (%)	8.6	9.5
Once a semester (%)	6.2	.
Once a year (%)	4.9	9.5
Never (%)	38.3	42.9
Total (N)	81	21

L4b: How often use recreational space around campus	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.8
Once a week or more (%)	11.1	9.5
A few times a month (%)	12.3	9.5
A few times a semester (%)	12.3	23.8
Once a semester (%)	8.6	4.8
Once a year (%)	9.9	9.5
Never (%)	45.7	42.9
Total (N)	81	21

L4c: How often participate in organized Campus Recreation activities	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	1.5	1.8
Once a week or more (%)	1.3	9.5
A few times a month (%)	2.6	.
A few times a semester (%)	7.8	4.8
Once a semester (%)	5.2	4.8
Once a year (%)	2.6	4.8
Never (%)	80.5	76.2
Total (N)	77	21

L4d: How often attend ARTS NC State programs	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.5
Once a week or more (%)	2.5	4.8
A few times a month (%)	6.2	4.8
A few times a semester (%)	17.3	19.0
Once a semester (%)	23.5	9.5
Once a year (%)	11.1	28.6
Never (%)	39.5	33.3
Total (N)	81	21

L4e: How often attend Wolfpack athletic events	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.1	2.1
Once a week or more (%)	1.3	4.8
A few times a month (%)	3.8	.
A few times a semester (%)	17.5	9.5
Once a semester (%)	8.8	19.0
Once a year (%)	15.0	19.0
Never (%)	53.8	47.6
Total (N)	80	21

L5: Interest in designated faculty-only dining facility	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	3.0
4: A great deal (%)	30.9	42.9
3: Some (%)	22.2	28.6
2: A little (%)	13.6	9.5
1: None at all (%)	33.3	19.0
Total (N)	81	21

L6: Likelihood of using gym on Centennial campus	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	1.7	1.8
4: Very likely (%)	13.4	9.5
3: Somewhat likely (%)	9.8	9.5
2: Not very likely (%)	14.6	28.6
1: Not at all likely (%)	62.2	52.4
Total (N)	82	21

Back to Top

Section M: Work Activities

M1: Total hours per week spent performing job-related work (collapsed)	White	Faculty of Color
Mean # Hrs Work	57.9	59.3
more than 60 hrs (%)	25.3	23.8
51 to 60 hrs (%)	42.2	38.1
41 to 50 hrs (%)	25.3	38.1
40 hrs or less (%)	7.2	.
Total (N)	83	21

M2A: Proportion of total hours spent on teaching/mentoring	White	Faculty of Color
Mean % of Time on Activity	38.7	35.5
more than 50% of time (%)	20.2	14.3
26% to 50% of time (%)	53.6	61.9
11% to 25% of time (%)	19.0	19.0
6% to 10% of time (%)	3.6	.
1% to 5% of time (%)	1.2	.
0% of time (%)	2.4	4.8
Total (N)	84	21

M2a_1r: Includes teaching (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	13.4	25.0
Yes (%)	86.6	75.0
Total (N)	82	20

M2a_2r: Includes professional development to improve teaching (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	64.6	65.0
Yes (%)	35.4	35.0
Total (N)	82	20

M2a_3r: Includes research projects with students (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	34.1	30.0
Yes (%)	65.9	70.0
Total (N)	82	20

M2a_4r: Includes supervising internships/field experiences (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	85.4	95.0
Yes (%)	14.6	5.0
Total (N)	82	20

M2a_5r: Includes student thesis/dissertation committee work (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	37.8	40.0
Yes (%)	62.2	60.0
Total (N)	82	20

M2B: Proportion of total hours spent advising students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean % of Time on Activity	7.4	6.5
26% to 50% of time (%)	3.6	.
11% to 25% of time (%)	9.5	14.3
6% to 10% of time (%)	22.6	19.0
1% to 5% of time (%)	47.6	42.9
0% of time (%)	16.7	23.8
Total (N)	84	21

M2b_1r: Includes formal advising (among those reporting time spent on advising)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	24.3	31.3
Yes (%)	75.7	68.8
Total (N)	70	16

M2b_2r: Includes informal advising (among those reporting time spent on advising)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	47.1	56.3
Yes (%)	52.9	43.8
Total (N)	70	16

M2C: Proportion of total hours spent on research/scholarly activities	White	Faculty of Color
Mean % of Time on Activity	31.8	35.9
more than 50% of time (%)	11.9	4.8
26% to 50% of time (%)	46.4	71.4
11% to 25% of time (%)	20.2	14.3
6% to 10% of time (%)	4.8	4.8
1% to 5% of time (%)	4.8	.
0% of time (%)	11.9	4.8
Total (N)	84	21

M2D: Proportion of total hours spent on creative artistry/literature	White	Faculty of Color
Mean % of Time on Activity	0.2	0.2
6% to 10% of time (%)	1.2	.
1% to 5% of time (%)	1.2	4.8
0% of time (%)	97.6	95.2
Total (N)	84	21

M2E: Proportion of total hours spent on extension/engagement/econ dev	White	Faculty of Color
Mean % of Time on Activity	1.7	2.6
more than 50% of time (%)	1.2	.
26% to 50% of time (%)	.	4.8
11% to 25% of time (%)	1.2	.
1% to 5% of time (%)	14.3	23.8
0% of time (%)	83.3	71.4
Total (N)	84	21

M2e_1r: Includes service learning teaching/mentoring (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	85.7	50.0
Yes (%)	14.3	50.0
Total (N)	14	6

M2e_2r: Includes extension education/non-credit programs (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	57.1	83.3
Yes (%)	42.9	16.7
Total (N)	14	6

M2e_3r: Includes economic development training/tech assistance (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	85.7	100.0
Yes (%)	14.3	.
Total (N)	14	6

M2e_4r: Includes partnering with private sector - job/investment creation (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	71.4	66.7
Yes (%)	28.6	33.3
Total (N)	14	6

M2e_5r: Public service grants/contracts (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	92.9	50.0
Yes (%)	7.1	50.0
Total (N)	14	6

M2F: Proportion of total hours spent on service work	White	Faculty of Color
Mean % of Time on Activity	10.0	12.4
26% to 50% of time (%)	4.8	4.8
11% to 25% of time (%)	23.8	33.3
6% to 10% of time (%)	27.4	28.6
1% to 5% of time (%)	28.6	23.8
0% of time (%)	15.5	9.5
Total (N)	84	21

M2f_1r: Includes advising student groups (among those reporting time spent on service work)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	84.5	89.5
Yes (%)	15.5	10.5
Total (N)	71	19

M2f_2r: Includes dept/college/university committees (among those reporting time spent on service work)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	18.3	26.3
Yes (%)	81.7	73.7
Total (N)	71	19

M2f_3r: Includes professional service (among those reporting time spent on service work)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	40.8	31.6
Yes (%)	59.2	68.4
Total (N)	71	19

M2f_4r: Includes academic program assessment activities (among those reporting time spent on service work)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	77.5	89.5
Yes (%)	22.5	10.5
Total (N)	71	19

M2f_5r: Includes other university service (among those reporting time spent on service work)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	67.6	68.4
Yes (%)	32.4	31.6
Total (N)	71	19

M2G: Proportion of total hours spent on tech/managerial innovation	White	Faculty of Color
Mean % of Time on Activity	0.6	0.2
6% to 10% of time (%)	3.6	.
1% to 5% of time (%)	7.1	4.8
0% of time (%)	89.3	95.2
Total (N)	84	21

M2H: Proportion of total hours spent on dept/college admin duties	White	Faculty of Color
Mean % of Time on Activity	7.5	2.4
more than 50% of time (%)	3.6	.
26% to 50% of time (%)	6.0	.
11% to 25% of time (%)	7.1	4.8
6% to 10% of time (%)	10.7	4.8
1% to 5% of time (%)	13.1	14.3
0% of time (%)	59.5	76.2
Total (N)	84	21

M3_1: Worked summer at NCSU without overload pay	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	46.4	28.6
Yes (%)	53.6	71.4
Total (N)	84	21

M3_2: Taught at NCSU on overload basis	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	81.0	95.2
Yes (%)	19.0	4.8
Total (N)	84	21

M3_3: Taught NCSU distance education class	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	83.3	100.0
Yes (%)	16.7	.
Total (N)	84	21

M3_4: Taught for another academic institution	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	95.2	76.2
Yes (%)	4.8	23.8
Total (N)	84	21

M3_5: Did outside consulting/freelance for pay	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	65.5	81.0
Yes (%)	34.5	19.0
Total (N)	84	21

M3_6: Did outside consulting/freelance without pay	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	64.3	90.5
Yes (%)	35.7	9.5
Total (N)	84	21

M3_7: Had other secondary employment	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	97.6	100.0
Yes (%)	2.4	.
Total (N)	84	21

M4: Frequency of volunteer work past 2 years	White	Faculty of Color
Never (%)	21.0	14.3
A few times (%)	46.9	38.1
About once per month (%)	9.9	23.8
Two or three times per month (%)	11.1	19.0
At least once per week (%)	11.1	4.8
Total (N)	81	21

M5: Frequency of public policy work past 5 years	White	Faculty of Color
Never (%)	55.6	66.7
Once or twice (%)	21.0	28.6
Three to five times (%)	18.5	4.8
Six to ten times (%)	1.2	.
More than 10 times (%)	3.7	.
Total (N)	81	21

M6: Management of work-related demands of past 2 years	White	Faculty of Color
1: Managing everything just fine (%)	11.0	14.3
2 (%)	25.6	28.6
3 (%)	24.4	28.6
4 (%)	30.5	19.0
5: Completely overwhelmed (%)	8.5	9.5
Total (N)	82	21

M7: Change how you spend your work time	White	Faculty of Color
I would change how I spent time (%)	64.9	57.9
I would not change a thing (%)	35.1	42.1
Total (N)	74	19

Back to Top

Section N: Conclusions/Overall Satisfaction

N1: Satisfaction with your "fit" in department	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	25.3	28.6
3: Satisfied (%)	48.2	57.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	26.5	4.8
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	9.5
Total (N)	83	21

N2: I generally feel valued in my department	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	22.9	38.1
3: Agree (%)	51.8	47.6
2: Disagree (%)	20.5	4.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.8	9.5
Total (N)	83	21

N3a: I am treated with respect by my students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	56.1	52.4
3: Agree (%)	42.7	42.9
2: Disagree (%)	1.2	4.8
Total (N)	82	21

N3b: I am treated with respect by dept support staff	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	60.2	52.4
3: Agree (%)	33.7	47.6
2: Disagree (%)	4.8	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.2	.
Total (N)	83	21

N3c: I am treated with respect faculty in my dept	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	36.1	42.9
3: Agree (%)	57.8	52.4
2: Disagree (%)	6.0	4.8
Total (N)	83	21

N3d: I am treated with respect by NCSU administrators	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	29.9	42.9
3: Agree (%)	53.2	47.6
2: Disagree (%)	13.0	9.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.9	.
Total (N)	77	21

N4: I would recommend my department as a good place to work	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	28.0	45.0
3: Agree (%)	52.4	35.0
2: Disagree (%)	17.1	15.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.4	5.0
Total (N)	82	20

N5a: Amount of stress due to reappointment, promotion or Tenure	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	2.6
4: A great deal (%)	18.8	29.4
3: Some (%)	31.9	29.4
2: A little (%)	17.4	11.8
1: None at all (%)	31.9	29.4
Total (N)	69	17

N5b: Amount of stress from research/publication demands	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0
4: A great deal (%)	30.3	47.6
3: Some (%)	48.7	19.0
2: A little (%)	10.5	23.8
1: None at all (%)	10.5	9.5
Total (N)	76	21

N5c: Amount of stress from professional Development	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	3.0
4: A great deal (%)	14.7	47.6
3: Some (%)	37.3	14.3
2: A little (%)	22.7	23.8
1: None at all (%)	25.3	14.3
Total (N)	75	21

N5d: Amount of stress from institutional procedures	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.4
4: A great deal (%)	19.7	10.0
3: Some (%)	36.8	40.0
2: A little (%)	23.7	30.0
1: None at all (%)	19.7	20.0
Total (N)	76	20

N5e: Amount of stress from committee work	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.7
4: A great deal (%)	15.0	19.0
3: Some (%)	38.8	47.6
2: A little (%)	30.0	19.0
1: None at all (%)	16.3	14.3
Total (N)	80	21

N5f: Amount of stress from relationships with students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	1.9	2.3
4: A great deal (%)	1.3	19.0
3: Some (%)	21.5	19.0
2: A little (%)	43.0	33.3
1: None at all (%)	34.2	28.6
Total (N)	79	21

N5g: Amount of stress from relationships with faculty in dept	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.1	2.0
4: A great deal (%)	7.6	9.5
3: Some (%)	26.6	23.8
2: A little (%)	34.2	23.8
1: None at all (%)	31.6	42.9
Total (N)	79	21

N5h: Amount of stress from relationships w/dept admin	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.3	2.0
4: A great deal (%)	14.1	14.3
3: Some (%)	29.5	14.3
2: A little (%)	30.8	28.6
1: None at all (%)	25.6	42.9
Total (N)	78	21

N5i: Amount of stress from relationships w/college admin	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.2	1.7
4: A great deal (%)	15.1	5.3
3: Some (%)	24.7	10.5
2: A little (%)	20.5	31.6
1: None at all (%)	39.7	52.6
Total (N)	73	19

N5j: Amount of stress from workload	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	2.8
4: A great deal (%)	37.0	33.3
3: Some (%)	32.1	28.6
2: A little (%)	21.0	19.0
1: None at all (%)	9.9	19.0
Total (N)	81	21

N5k: Amount of stress from work/personal life balance	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9
4: A great deal (%)	34.6	38.1
3: Some (%)	34.6	33.3
2: A little (%)	16.0	4.8
1: None at all (%)	14.8	23.8
Total (N)	81	21

N5l: Amount of stress from working with under-prepared students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	3.0
4: A great deal (%)	13.6	47.6
3: Some (%)	44.4	23.8
2: A little (%)	38.3	9.5
1: None at all (%)	3.7	19.0
Total (N)	81	21

N5m: Amount of stress from self-assessment activities	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.1	2.6
4: A great deal (%)	6.3	23.8
3: Some (%)	26.6	28.6
2: A little (%)	40.5	28.6
1: None at all (%)	26.6	19.0
Total (N)	79	21

N5n: Amount of stress from program assessment requirements	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.2	2.1
4: A great deal (%)	17.6	11.1
3: Some (%)	17.6	16.7
2: A little (%)	30.9	38.9
1: None at all (%)	33.8	33.3
Total (N)	68	18

N6: Overall satisfaction with NCSU	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	9.8	19.0
3: Satisfied (%)	61.0	57.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	29.3	19.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	4.8
Total (N)	82	21

N7: More or less satisfied with NC State, compared to 5 yrs ago	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	3.3
A lot more satisfied now (%)	4.9	14.3
Somewhat more satisfied now (%)	17.3	23.8
Neither more or less satisfied now (%)	28.4	42.9
Somewhat less satisfied now (%)	30.9	19.0
A lot less satisfied now (%)	18.5	.
Total (N)	81	21

N8: Ever considered leaving NC State for another university	White	Faculty of Color
No - never considered leaving (%)	14.8	33.3
Yes - not very seriously (%)	24.7	28.6
Yes - somewhat seriously (%)	28.4	14.3
Yes - very seriously (%)	32.1	23.8
Total (N)	81	21

N10: Ever considered leaving academe, since coming to NC State	White	Faculty of Color
No - never considered leaving (%)	53.7	66.7
Yes - not very seriously (%)	17.1	4.8
Yes - somewhat seriously (%)	18.3	14.3
Yes - very seriously (%)	11.0	14.3
Total (N)	82	21

Back to top

Endnote:

1. "Faculty of Color" includes African American, Asian, Hispanic, and Native American respondents. Due to small cell sizes at this level of analysis,
this categorization of race/ethnicity was necessary to protect respondent confidentiality. (back)

For more information on the NC State University 2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey contact:
Dr. Nancy Whelchel, Associate Director for Survey Research
Office of Institutional Planning and Research
Box 7002
NCSU
Phone: (919) 515-4184
Email: ncsu_surveys@ncsu.edu

Posted: April, 2007

Return to PAMS Results Index

Return to 2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey Table of Contents Page