North Carolina State University
2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey:

Results for the College of Physical and Mathematical Sciences
by Gender

To skip directly to a particular section, select the section below.

Section B: Image and Vision	Section I: Post-Tenure Review
Section C: Leadership	Section J: Pay and Compensation
Section D: Faculty-Administration Relationships	Section K: Campus Infrastructure/Physical Environment
Section E: Diversity/Multiculturalism	Section L: Recreation/Wellness
Section F: Working Relationships	Section M: Work Activities
Section G: Faculty Support & Professional Development	Section N: Conclusions/Overall Satisfaction
Section H: Performance Review, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure

A2: Ever held an administrative position	Male	Female
..... No (%)	72.5	88.9
..... Yes (%)	27.5	11.1
Total (N)	91	27

Back to Top

Section B: Image and Vision

B1a: Department doing good job of recruiting faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	31.8	37.0
3: Agree (%)	56.8	48.1
2: Disagree (%)	8.0	11.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.4	3.7
Total (N)	88	27

B1b: Department creating culture where faculty can develop to full potential	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	26.1	22.2
3: Agree (%)	47.7	48.1
2: Disagree (%)	22.7	25.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.4	3.7
Total (N)	88	27

B1c: Department retaining most effective and productive faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	17.4	8.3
3: Agree (%)	48.8	62.5
2: Disagree (%)	23.3	20.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	10.5	8.3
Total (N)	86	24

B2a: Department national reputation for undergraduate educ	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.9	3.6
5: Very strong (%)	21.8	16.0
4: Strong (%)	48.3	32.0
3: Average (%)	27.6	52.0
2: Weak (%)	2.3	.
Total (N)	87	25

B2b: Department national reputation for graduate education	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.7	3.3
5: Very strong (%)	12.5	11.5
4: Strong (%)	47.7	19.2
3: Average (%)	36.4	61.5
2: Weak (%)	2.3	7.7
1: Very weak (%)	1.1	.
Total (N)	88	26

B2c: Department national reputation for research & scholarly activity	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.8	3.8
5: Very strong (%)	13.3	15.4
4: Strong (%)	60.0	50.0
3: Average (%)	24.4	30.8
2: Weak (%)	2.2	3.8
Total (N)	90	26

B2d: Department national reputation for creative artistry and literature	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	3.5
5: Very strong (%)	20.0	.
4: Strong (%)	40.0	50.0
3: Average (%)	26.7	50.0
2: Weak (%)	6.7	.
1: Very weak (%)	6.7	.
Total (N)	15	4

B2e: Department national reputation for tech & managerial innovation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.4
5: Very strong (%)	3.8	8.3
4: Strong (%)	48.1	25.0
3: Average (%)	44.2	66.7
2: Weak (%)	3.8	.
Total (N)	52	12

B2f: Department national reputation for extension & engagement	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.7
5: Very strong (%)	8.6	10.5
4: Strong (%)	44.3	52.6
3: Average (%)	38.6	31.6
2: Weak (%)	8.6	5.3
Total (N)	70	19

B2g: Department national reputation for contrib to econ Development	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.3
5: Very strong (%)	6.9	.
4: Strong (%)	37.9	40.0
3: Average (%)	44.8	50.0
2: Weak (%)	6.9	10.0
1: Very weak (%)	3.4	.
Total (N)	58	10

B3a: Grade undergraduate majors' ability to meet prog demands	Male	Female
Mean Rating	4.0	4.0
A (%)	27.3	26.9
B (%)	52.3	53.8
C (%)	14.8	15.4
D (%)	5.7	3.8
Total (N)	88	26

B3b: Grade graduate student ability to meet prog demands	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.9	4.0
A (%)	14.4	19.2
B (%)	67.8	61.5
C (%)	15.6	15.4
D (%)	2.2	3.8
Total (N)	90	26

B3c: Grade demonstrated professional ability of faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	4.4	4.5
A (%)	49.5	57.7
B (%)	42.9	34.6
C (%)	6.6	7.7
D (%)	1.1	.
Total (N)	91	26

B3d: Grade professional achievement of faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	4.4	4.5
A (%)	50.5	57.7
B (%)	42.9	38.5
C (%)	5.5	3.8
D (%)	1.1	.
Total (N)	91	26

B3e: Grade own demonstrated professional ability	Male	Female
Mean Rating	4.5	4.6
A (%)	52.2	64.0
B (%)	46.7	32.0
C (%)	.	4.0
F (%)	1.1	.
Total (N)	90	25

B3f: Grade own professional achievement	Male	Female
Mean Rating	4.4	4.6
A (%)	48.9	60.0
B (%)	46.7	36.0
C (%)	3.3	4.0
F (%)	1.1	.
Total (N)	90	25

B4: Department's vision for the future	Male	Female
Clear vision; actively working toward goals (%)	44.4	34.6
Vision with slow progress (%)	45.6	46.2
No clear vision (%)	8.9	15.4
Not familiar (%)	1.1	3.8
Total (N)	90	26

B5: Agreement with department vision for future	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	33.8	33.3
3: Agree (%)	56.3	61.9
2: Disagree (%)	8.8	4.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.3	.
Total (N)	80	21

B6: College's vision for the future	Male	Female
Clear vision; actively working toward goals (%)	26.4	23.1
Vision with slow progress (%)	29.7	15.4
No clear vision (%)	18.7	11.5
Not familiar (%)	25.3	50.0
Total (N)	91	26

B7a: Department change in next five years	Male	Female
Change for the better (%)	44.0	46.2
Change for the worse (%)	23.1	19.2
Not really change (%)	33.0	34.6
Total (N)	91	26

B7b: College change in next five years	Male	Female
Change for the better (%)	34.1	29.2
Change for the worse (%)	19.3	12.5
Not really change (%)	46.6	58.3
Total (N)	88	24

B7c: NC State change in next five years	Male	Female
Change for the better (%)	37.1	33.3
Change for the worse (%)	15.7	4.2
Not really change (%)	47.2	62.5
Total (N)	89	24

Back to Top

Section C: Leadership

C1a: Dept admin communication with faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.1
4: Excellent (%)	42.2	56.0
3: Good (%)	38.9	16.0
2: Fair (%)	11.1	12.0
1: Poor (%)	7.8	16.0
Total (N)	90	25

C1b: Dept admin seek faculty input for dept vision	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.2
4: Excellent (%)	43.3	45.8
3: Good (%)	36.7	33.3
2: Fair (%)	12.2	16.7
1: Poor (%)	7.8	4.2
Total (N)	90	24

C1c: Dept admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.1
4: Excellent (%)	27.8	37.5
3: Good (%)	38.9	45.8
2: Fair (%)	24.4	8.3
1: Poor (%)	8.9	8.3
Total (N)	90	24

C1d: Dept admin delegate dept responsibility to faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.1
4: Excellent (%)	31.5	43.5
3: Good (%)	48.3	34.8
2: Fair (%)	16.9	13.0
1: Poor (%)	3.4	8.7
Total (N)	89	23

C1e: Dept admin grant faculty autonomy	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.4
4: Excellent (%)	37.9	52.0
3: Good (%)	41.4	36.0
2: Fair (%)	16.1	8.0
1: Poor (%)	4.6	4.0
Total (N)	87	25

C1f: Dept admin set clear and explicit priorities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	18.0	24.0
3: Good (%)	53.9	56.0
2: Fair (%)	21.3	16.0
1: Poor (%)	6.7	4.0
Total (N)	89	25

C1g: Dept admin appreciate your contrib to mission	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.1
4: Excellent (%)	27.6	44.0
3: Good (%)	46.0	28.0
2: Fair (%)	14.9	20.0
1: Poor (%)	11.5	8.0
Total (N)	87	25

C1h: Dept admin conflict resolution	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	23.4	22.7
3: Good (%)	41.6	40.9
2: Fair (%)	23.4	9.1
1: Poor (%)	11.7	27.3
Total (N)	77	22

C1i: Dept admin provide necessary resources	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	20.2	28.0
3: Good (%)	34.8	44.0
2: Fair (%)	32.6	24.0
1: Poor (%)	12.4	4.0
Total (N)	89	25

C1j: Dept admin allocate resources fairly	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	22.4	29.2
3: Good (%)	50.6	33.3
2: Fair (%)	17.6	29.2
1: Poor (%)	9.4	8.3
Total (N)	85	24

C1k: Dept admin serve as advocate for dept to college	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	45.1	40.9
3: Good (%)	36.6	36.4
2: Fair (%)	13.4	9.1
1: Poor (%)	4.9	13.6
Total (N)	82	22

C1l: Dept admin support academic freedom	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.6
4: Excellent (%)	50.6	60.0
3: Good (%)	41.0	35.0
2: Fair (%)	6.0	5.0
1: Poor (%)	2.4	.
Total (N)	83	20

C1m: Dept admin make rational decisions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.2
4: Excellent (%)	30.3	41.7
3: Good (%)	42.7	41.7
2: Fair (%)	21.3	8.3
1: Poor (%)	5.6	8.3
Total (N)	89	24

C1n: Dept admin make equitable decisions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	29.4	37.5
3: Good (%)	43.5	29.2
2: Fair (%)	21.2	16.7
1: Poor (%)	5.9	16.7
Total (N)	85	24

C1o: Dept admin promote diversity within dept	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.3
4: Excellent (%)	49.4	50.0
3: Good (%)	40.0	29.2
2: Fair (%)	9.4	20.8
1: Poor (%)	1.2	.
Total (N)	85	24

C2a: College admin communication with faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	14.8	11.1
3: Good (%)	40.7	50.0
2: Fair (%)	30.9	33.3
1: Poor (%)	13.6	5.6
Total (N)	81	18

C2b: College admin seek faculty input for vision	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.3
4: Excellent (%)	9.3	14.3
3: Good (%)	30.7	14.3
2: Fair (%)	41.3	57.1
1: Poor (%)	18.7	14.3
Total (N)	75	14

C2c: College admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.4
4: Excellent (%)	12.1	14.3
3: Good (%)	31.8	35.7
2: Fair (%)	39.4	28.6
1: Poor (%)	16.7	21.4
Total (N)	66	14

C2d: College admin grant departmental autonomy	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	22.8	25.0
3: Good (%)	48.1	56.3
2: Fair (%)	17.7	6.3
1: Poor (%)	11.4	12.5
Total (N)	79	16

C2e: College admin set clear and explicit priorities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	15.1	33.3
3: Good (%)	41.1	25.0
2: Fair (%)	30.1	41.7
1: Poor (%)	13.7	.
Total (N)	73	12

C2f: College admin appreciate your contrib to mission	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	18.3	28.6
3: Good (%)	43.7	35.7
2: Fair (%)	22.5	21.4
1: Poor (%)	15.5	14.3
Total (N)	71	14

C2g: College admin conflict resolution	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	16.7	28.6
3: Good (%)	47.6	42.9
2: Fair (%)	19.0	28.6
1: Poor (%)	16.7	.
Total (N)	42	7

C2h: College admin provide necessary resources	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	12.0	14.3
3: Good (%)	31.3	47.6
2: Fair (%)	28.9	28.6
1: Poor (%)	27.7	9.5
Total (N)	83	21

C2i: College admin allocate resources fairly	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.3
4: Excellent (%)	15.3	14.3
3: Good (%)	38.9	28.6
2: Fair (%)	27.8	28.6
1: Poor (%)	18.1	28.6
Total (N)	72	14

C2j: College admin serve as advocate for college to univ	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.5
4: Excellent (%)	27.4	30.8
3: Good (%)	40.3	23.1
2: Fair (%)	19.4	15.4
1: Poor (%)	12.9	30.8
Total (N)	62	13

C2k: College admin support academic freedom	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.4
4: Excellent (%)	35.2	43.8
3: Good (%)	49.3	50.0
2: Fair (%)	11.3	6.3
1: Poor (%)	4.2	.
Total (N)	71	16

C2l: College admin make rational decisions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	15.3	30.8
3: Good (%)	63.9	38.5
2: Fair (%)	16.7	23.1
1: Poor (%)	4.2	7.7
Total (N)	72	13

C2m: College admin make equitable decisions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	16.2	23.1
3: Good (%)	54.4	46.2
2: Fair (%)	16.2	15.4
1: Poor (%)	13.2	15.4
Total (N)	68	13

C2n: College admin promote diversity within college	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.4
4: Excellent (%)	51.9	55.6
3: Good (%)	40.5	33.3
2: Fair (%)	5.1	11.1
1: Poor (%)	2.5	.
Total (N)	79	18

C3a: Univ admin communication with faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.4
4: Excellent (%)	11.0	7.1
3: Good (%)	23.3	35.7
2: Fair (%)	52.1	42.9
1: Poor (%)	13.7	14.3
Total (N)	73	14

C3b: Univ admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.2
4: Excellent (%)	9.4	10.0
3: Good (%)	22.6	20.0
2: Fair (%)	56.6	50.0
1: Poor (%)	11.3	20.0
Total (N)	53	10

C3c: Univ admin set clear and explicit priorities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	12.1	8.3
3: Good (%)	33.3	50.0
2: Fair (%)	42.4	33.3
1: Poor (%)	12.1	8.3
Total (N)	66	12

C3d: Univ admin serves as advocate for univ to constituents	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	17.2	20.0
3: Good (%)	51.7	40.0
2: Fair (%)	19.0	40.0
1: Poor (%)	12.1	.
Total (N)	58	10

C3e: Univ admin support academic freedom	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.1
4: Excellent (%)	32.4	40.0
3: Good (%)	50.0	33.3
2: Fair (%)	13.2	20.0
1: Poor (%)	4.4	6.7
Total (N)	68	15

C3f: Univ admin make rational decisions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	11.3	16.7
3: Good (%)	48.4	50.0
2: Fair (%)	32.3	25.0
1: Poor (%)	8.1	8.3
Total (N)	62	12

C3g: Univ admin make equitable decisions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.5
4: Excellent (%)	11.5	18.2
3: Good (%)	42.6	36.4
2: Fair (%)	26.2	18.2
1: Poor (%)	19.7	27.3
Total (N)	61	11

C3h: Univ admin promote diversity within university	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	31.4	26.7
3: Good (%)	55.7	46.7
2: Fair (%)	12.9	20.0
1: Poor (%)	.	6.7
Total (N)	70	15

Back to Top

Section D: Faculty-Administration Relationships

D1a: I am encouraged to give input on curricular issues	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	48.9	44.0
3: Agree (%)	42.2	48.0
2: Disagree (%)	6.7	8.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.2	.
Total (N)	90	25

D1b: I am encouraged to give input on prog assessment	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	30.3	36.0
3: Agree (%)	55.1	48.0
2: Disagree (%)	12.4	16.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.2	.
Total (N)	89	25

D1c: I am encouraged to give input on dept hiring	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	46.1	28.0
3: Agree (%)	38.2	52.0
2: Disagree (%)	11.2	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.5	.
Total (N)	89	25

D1d: I am encouraged to give input on college admin appointments	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.2	13.0
3: Agree (%)	35.2	34.8
2: Disagree (%)	38.6	52.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	15.9	.
Total (N)	88	23

D1e: I am encouraged to give input on university admin appointments	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	6.9	4.3
3: Agree (%)	36.8	30.4
2: Disagree (%)	40.2	47.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	16.1	17.4
Total (N)	87	23

D2: Familiarity with academic program assessment in dept	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	2.6
4: Very familiar (%)	32.6	24.0
3: Somewhat familiar (%)	48.3	28.0
2: Not very familiar (%)	13.5	32.0
1: Not at all familiar (%)	5.6	16.0
Total (N)	89	25

D3a: Understanding of resource allocation to university	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.0
4: Very well (%)	8.0	.
3: Fairly well (%)	40.2	24.0
2: Not very well (%)	40.2	48.0
1: Not at all (%)	11.5	28.0
Total (N)	87	25

D3b: Understanding of resource allocation to college	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	1.9
4: Very well (%)	5.7	.
3: Fairly well (%)	34.5	8.0
2: Not very well (%)	49.4	72.0
1: Not at all (%)	10.3	20.0
Total (N)	87	25

D3c: Understanding of resource allocation to department	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.1
4: Very well (%)	12.5	.
3: Fairly well (%)	43.2	32.0
2: Not very well (%)	37.5	48.0
1: Not at all (%)	6.8	20.0
Total (N)	88	25

D3d: Understanding of resource allocation within department	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.6
4: Very well (%)	22.2	12.0
3: Fairly well (%)	48.9	44.0
2: Not very well (%)	23.3	32.0
1: Not at all (%)	5.6	12.0
Total (N)	90	25

D4: Faculty have sufficient input on dept resource allocation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	12.4	4.2
3: Agree (%)	55.1	62.5
2: Disagree (%)	27.0	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.6	.
Total (N)	89	24

D5: Dept faculty searches/appointments are collegial and inclusive	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	41.6	52.0
3: Agree (%)	44.9	28.0
2: Disagree (%)	11.2	12.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.2	8.0
Total (N)	89	25

D6a: Relations between faculty in dept and dept admin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.2
4: Excellent (%)	42.7	45.8
3: Good (%)	41.6	37.5
2: Fair (%)	9.0	8.3
1: Poor (%)	6.7	8.3
Total (N)	89	24

D6b: Relations between faculty in dept and college admin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	16.3	23.8
3: Good (%)	52.5	38.1
2: Fair (%)	18.8	23.8
1: Poor (%)	12.5	14.3
Total (N)	80	21

D6c: Relations between faculty in dept and univ admin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.5
4: Excellent (%)	4.8	21.4
3: Good (%)	51.6	21.4
2: Fair (%)	32.3	42.9
1: Poor (%)	11.3	14.3
Total (N)	62	14

D6d: Relations between all faculty and univ admin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	6.7	15.4
3: Good (%)	48.3	38.5
2: Fair (%)	33.3	38.5
1: Poor (%)	11.7	7.7
Total (N)	60	13

D7a: Faculty Senate effective commun between faculty and univ admin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	7.4	.
3: Agree (%)	55.6	70.0
2: Disagree (%)	22.2	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	14.8	10.0
Total (N)	54	10

D7b: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty in general	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	3.9	11.1
3: Agree (%)	58.8	44.4
2: Disagree (%)	25.5	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	11.8	11.1
Total (N)	51	9

D7c: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty like me	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	2.0	10.0
3: Agree (%)	46.9	20.0
2: Disagree (%)	36.7	30.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	14.3	40.0
Total (N)	49	10

D8: Effectiveness of university grievance procedures	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	2.0
4: Very effective (%)	20.0	.
3: Somewhat effective (%)	70.0	33.3
2: Not very effective (%)	6.7	33.3
1: Not at all effective (%)	3.3	33.3
Total (N)	30	6

D9: Importance of "ombuds" for informal conflict resolution	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.5
4: Very important (%)	43.0	52.2
3: Somewhat important (%)	38.4	43.5
2: Not very important (%)	15.1	4.3
1: Not at all important (%)	3.5	.
Total (N)	86	23

Back to Top

Section E: Diversity/Multiculturalism

E1: Importance of institutional emphasis on diversity/multiculturalism	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.7
4: Very important (%)	40.4	72.7
3: Somewhat important (%)	41.6	27.3
2: Not very important (%)	10.1	.
1: Not at all important (%)	7.9	.
Total (N)	89	22

E2: Importance of diversity to enhanced learning in own classroom	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	3.2
4: Very important (%)	13.6	40.9
3: Somewhat important (%)	40.9	40.9
2: Not very important (%)	31.8	18.2
1: Not at all important (%)	13.6	.
Total (N)	88	22

E3: NCSU prepares students to live and work in diverse society	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	14.1	10.5
3: Agree (%)	76.9	57.9
2: Disagree (%)	9.0	31.6
Total (N)	78	19

E4a: My dept recruits historically underrepresented students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	48.3	52.9
3: Agree (%)	44.8	47.1
2: Disagree (%)	5.7	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.1	.
Total (N)	87	17

E4b: My dept retains historically underrepresented students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	45.1	25.0
3: Agree (%)	47.6	68.8
2: Disagree (%)	6.1	6.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.2	.
Total (N)	82	16

E4c: My dept supports historically underrepresented students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	46.2	26.7
3: Agree (%)	44.9	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	7.7	13.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.3	.
Total (N)	78	15

E4d: My dept recruits historically underrepresented faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	41.9	35.0
3: Agree (%)	51.2	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	5.8	5.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.2	.
Total (N)	86	20

E4e: My dept retains historically underrepresented faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	44.3	25.0
3: Agree (%)	50.0	62.5
2: Disagree (%)	4.3	12.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.4	.
Total (N)	70	16

E4f: My dept supports historically underrepresented faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	43.5	25.0
3: Agree (%)	50.7	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	5.8	25.0
Total (N)	69	16

E5a: Dept environ accepting/respectful of age	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	47.6	50.0
3: Agree (%)	45.2	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	2.4	10.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.8	.
Total (N)	84	20

E5b: Dept environ accepting/respectful of disability status	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	52.6	50.0
3: Agree (%)	45.6	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	1.8	.
Total (N)	57	10

E5c: Dept environ accepting/respectful of gender	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	49.4	42.9
3: Agree (%)	47.0	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	3.6	23.8
Total (N)	83	21

E5d: Dept environ accepting/respectful of military status	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	52.1	71.4
3: Agree (%)	43.8	28.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.2	.
Total (N)	48	7

E5e: Dept environ accepting/respectful of nationality/ethnic origin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	52.4	61.9
3: Agree (%)	45.1	38.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.4	.
Total (N)	82	21

E5f: Dept environ accepting/respectful of race and color	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	53.1	55.6
3: Agree (%)	44.4	44.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.5	.
Total (N)	81	18

E5g: Dept environ accepting/respectful of religion	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	53.8	50.0
3: Agree (%)	44.6	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.5	.
Total (N)	65	14

E5h: Dept environ accepting/respectful of sexual orientation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	54.5	44.4
3: Agree (%)	36.4	44.4
2: Disagree (%)	4.5	11.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.5	.
Total (N)	44	9

E6a: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of age	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	56.8	75.0
3: Agree (%)	40.7	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.5	.
Total (N)	81	20

E6b: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of disability status	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	57.8	73.3
3: Agree (%)	40.6	26.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.6	.
Total (N)	64	15

E6c: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of gender	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	56.3	65.0
3: Agree (%)	42.5	35.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.3	.
Total (N)	80	20

E6d: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of military status	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	54.7	76.9
3: Agree (%)	41.5	23.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.8	.
Total (N)	53	13

E6e: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of national/ethnic origin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	55.0	75.0
3: Agree (%)	42.5	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.5	.
Total (N)	80	20

E6f: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of race and color	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	56.4	72.2
3: Agree (%)	41.0	27.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.6	.
Total (N)	78	18

E6g: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of religion	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	55.7	72.2
3: Agree (%)	42.9	27.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.4	.
Total (N)	70	18

E6h: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of sexual orientation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	59.6	66.7
3: Agree (%)	32.7	20.0
2: Disagree (%)	3.8	13.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.8	.
Total (N)	52	15

E7: Faculty diversity/multiculturalism enhancement of intellectual diversity in dept	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	3.2
4: A great deal (%)	16.1	33.3
3: Some (%)	46.0	52.4
2: A little (%)	12.6	14.3
1: Not at all (%)	25.3	.
Total (N)	87	21

E8: Inclusion of diversity-related topics, scholarship, etc in your courses	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.8	2.0
4: A great deal (%)	5.1	.
3: Some (%)	16.5	42.1
2: A little (%)	27.8	15.8
1: Not at all (%)	50.6	42.1
Total (N)	79	19

E9a: Interest in research, extension, art endeavors outside U.S.	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.3
4: A great deal (%)	43.8	54.5
3: Some (%)	31.5	31.8
2: A little (%)	11.2	.
1: None (%)	13.5	13.6
Total (N)	89	22

E9b: Interest in teaching study abroad	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.7
4: A great deal (%)	20.2	36.4
3: Some (%)	27.0	27.3
2: A little (%)	19.1	9.1
1: None (%)	33.7	27.3
Total (N)	89	22

E9c: Interest in participating in spring break service learning	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.5	1.9
4: A great deal (%)	3.4	14.3
3: Some (%)	11.4	14.3
2: A little (%)	17.0	14.3
1: None (%)	68.2	57.1
Total (N)	88	21

E9d: Interest in participating in international service projects	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.1	2.6
4: A great deal (%)	12.6	23.8
3: Some (%)	23.0	38.1
2: A little (%)	21.8	14.3
1: None (%)	42.5	23.8
Total (N)	87	21

E9e: Interest in teaching in international studies major	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.6	1.8
4: A great deal (%)	3.4	4.8
3: Some (%)	14.8	28.6
2: A little (%)	17.0	9.5
1: None (%)	64.8	57.1
Total (N)	88	21

E9f: Interest in advising international students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.8
4: A great deal (%)	21.3	23.8
3: Some (%)	43.8	42.9
2: A little (%)	16.9	19.0
1: None (%)	18.0	14.3
Total (N)	89	21

Back to Top

Section F: Working Relationships

F1: There is unity/cohesion among faculty in my department	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	21.6	13.6
3: Agree (%)	50.0	31.8
2: Disagree (%)	22.7	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.7	4.5
Total (N)	88	22

F2a: Good communication between my students and me	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	52.9	63.6
3: Agree (%)	47.1	36.4
Total (N)	87	22

F2b: Good communication between dept and our students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.0	23.8
3: Agree (%)	70.2	71.4
2: Disagree (%)	4.8	4.8
Total (N)	84	21

F2c: Good communication between faculty in my dept	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	21.6	18.2
3: Agree (%)	58.0	59.1
2: Disagree (%)	17.0	22.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.4	.
Total (N)	88	22

F2d: Good communication between my dept and other depts	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	6.3	5.9
3: Agree (%)	62.5	29.4
2: Disagree (%)	23.4	64.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.8	.
Total (N)	64	17

F2e: Good communication between my college and other colleges	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	8.7	7.1
3: Agree (%)	58.7	42.9
2: Disagree (%)	23.9	42.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.7	7.1
Total (N)	46	14

F3: Dept environ promotes respectful dialogue between diverse perspectives	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	34.9	38.1
3: Agree (%)	54.7	57.1
2: Disagree (%)	9.3	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.2	4.8
Total (N)	86	21

F4a: Frequency given/recvd teaching advice in dept past few years	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.2
Frequently (%)	35.2	30.4
Sometimes (%)	47.7	60.9
Seldom (%)	8.0	4.3
Never (%)	9.1	4.3
Total (N)	88	23

F4b: Frequency given/recvd research/artistic feedback in dept past few yrs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.8
Frequently (%)	34.9	26.1
Sometimes (%)	43.0	39.1
Seldom (%)	14.0	21.7
Never (%)	8.1	13.0
Total (N)	86	23

F4c: Frequency given/recvd help with dept/college bureaucracy past few yrs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0
Frequently (%)	28.4	26.1
Sometimes (%)	42.0	56.5
Seldom (%)	26.1	13.0
Never (%)	3.4	4.3
Total (N)	88	23

F4d: Frequency given/recvd help undrsnd reappointment, promotion, tenure past few yrs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9
Frequently (%)	25.0	21.7
Sometimes (%)	52.3	60.9
Seldom (%)	17.0	4.3
Never (%)	5.7	13.0
Total (N)	88	23

F4e: Frequency given/recvd help with work/personal balance issues past few yrs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.2	2.0
Frequently (%)	11.4	13.0
Sometimes (%)	27.3	21.7
Seldom (%)	28.4	21.7
Never (%)	33.0	43.5
Total (N)	88	23

F5a: Frequency of collab with faculty in your dept	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.4
Frequently (%)	55.7	54.5
Sometimes (%)	30.7	36.4
Seldom (%)	9.1	.
Never (%)	4.5	9.1
Total (N)	88	22

F5b: Frequency of collab with faculty in other NCSU depts	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.6
Frequently (%)	33.0	31.8
Sometimes (%)	28.4	27.3
Seldom (%)	19.3	9.1
Never (%)	19.3	31.8
Total (N)	88	22

F5c: Frequency of collab with faculty from other universities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.2
Frequently (%)	61.4	59.1
Sometimes (%)	26.1	18.2
Seldom (%)	6.8	4.5
Never (%)	5.7	18.2
Total (N)	88	22

F5d: Frequency of collab with non-faculty external to NCSU	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	1.9
Frequently (%)	22.7	18.2
Sometimes (%)	29.5	9.1
Seldom (%)	26.1	13.6
Never (%)	21.6	59.1
Total (N)	88	22

Back to Top

Section G: Faculty Support & Professional Development

G1a: Satisfaction with level of courses	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	52.9	40.9
3: Satisfied (%)	40.0	45.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	4.7	9.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.4	4.5
Total (N)	85	22

G1b: Satisfaction with number of courses	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	34.5	45.5
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	36.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	13.1	18.2
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.4	.
Total (N)	84	22

G1c: Satisfaction with choice in courses	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	50.6	42.9
3: Satisfied (%)	43.5	42.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	2.4	9.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	3.5	4.8
Total (N)	85	21

G1d: Satisfaction with course content discretion	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	3.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	61.2	57.1
3: Satisfied (%)	37.6	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	1.2	9.5
Total (N)	85	21

G1e: Satisfaction with number of students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	29.4	40.9
3: Satisfied (%)	57.6	36.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	9.4	18.2
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	3.5	4.5
Total (N)	85	22

G1f: Satisfaction with quality of undergraduates	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	17.1	5.0
3: Satisfied (%)	52.4	70.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	24.4	20.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.1	5.0
Total (N)	82	20

G1g: Satisfaction with quality of graduate students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	17.6	10.0
3: Satisfied (%)	63.5	70.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	17.6	20.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	1.2	.
Total (N)	85	20

G1h: Satisfaction with access to grad TAs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	18.8	18.2
3: Satisfied (%)	57.5	59.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	15.0	18.2
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	8.8	4.5
Total (N)	80	22

G1i: Satisfaction with access to grad RAs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	20.0	20.0
3: Satisfied (%)	58.6	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	17.1	6.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	4.3	6.7
Total (N)	70	15

G2a: NCSU supports innovative teaching	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.3	42.1
3: Agree (%)	60.2	47.4
2: Disagree (%)	13.3	5.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.2	5.3
Total (N)	83	19

G2b: NCSU supports innovative research and scholarly activity	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	30.0	52.9
3: Agree (%)	57.5	35.3
2: Disagree (%)	12.5	11.8
Total (N)	80	17

G2c: NCSU supports innovative creative artistry and literature	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.0	50.0
3: Agree (%)	43.8	25.0
2: Disagree (%)	18.8	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	12.5	.
Total (N)	16	4

G2d: NCSU supports innovative extension/engagement/econ dev activity	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	19.0	14.3
3: Agree (%)	64.3	71.4
2: Disagree (%)	16.7	14.3
Total (N)	42	7

G3a: NCSU rewards innovative teaching	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	14.8	10.5
3: Agree (%)	46.9	42.1
2: Disagree (%)	32.1	31.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.2	15.8
Total (N)	81	19

G3b: NCSU rewards innovative research and scholarly activity	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	34.9	33.3
3: Agree (%)	45.8	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	15.7	16.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.6	.
Total (N)	83	18

G3c: NCSU rewards innovative creative artistry and literature	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	21.4	25.0
3: Agree (%)	50.0	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	21.4	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.1	.
Total (N)	14	4

G3d: NCSU rewards innovative extension/engagement/econ dev activity	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	7.9	12.5
3: Agree (%)	68.4	25.0
2: Disagree (%)	15.8	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.9	12.5
Total (N)	38	8

G4a: Satisfaction: Availability of classroom technology	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	22.1	38.1
3: Satisfied (%)	53.5	38.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	15.1	14.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	9.3	9.5
Total (N)	86	21

G4b: Satisfaction: Teaching reduction for scholarly/prof growth	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	13.5	15.8
3: Satisfied (%)	47.3	31.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	24.3	42.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	14.9	10.5
Total (N)	74	19

G4c: Satisfaction: Teaching workshop/seminar opportunities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	16.0	21.1
3: Satisfied (%)	80.0	73.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	2.7	5.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	1.3	.
Total (N)	75	19

G4d: Satisfaction: Avail of funds to attend teaching conference/wrkshp	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	10.3	10.0
3: Satisfied (%)	55.2	30.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	19.0	40.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	15.5	20.0
Total (N)	58	10

G4e: Satisfaction: Learning technology training/support	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	14.5	26.7
3: Satisfied (%)	69.7	53.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	10.5	20.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.3	.
Total (N)	76	15

G4f: Satisfaction: Campus bookstore meeting course needs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	20.5	16.7
3: Satisfied (%)	74.0	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	5.5	11.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	5.6
Total (N)	73	18

G4g: Satisfaction: Availability of funds to present work	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	13.3	5.3
3: Satisfied (%)	41.3	52.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	29.3	26.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	16.0	15.8
Total (N)	75	19

G4h: Satisfaction: Opportunities for scholarly/professional leave	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	13.5	.
3: Satisfied (%)	51.4	43.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	18.9	43.8
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	16.2	12.5
Total (N)	74	16

G4i: Satisfaction: Financial support for scholarly/professional leave	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	14.5	.
3: Satisfied (%)	43.5	31.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	24.6	56.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	17.4	12.5
Total (N)	69	16

G4j: Satisfaction: Leadership development opportunities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	8.0	.
3: Satisfied (%)	60.0	62.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	20.0	37.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	12.0	.
Total (N)	50	8

G4k: Satisfaction: Support for dept assessment Activities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	11.9	9.1
3: Satisfied (%)	64.4	54.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	13.6	36.4
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	10.2	.
Total (N)	59	11

G4l: Satisfaction: Availability of/access to materials via NCSU Libraries	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	41.2	26.3
3: Satisfied (%)	56.5	63.2
2: Dissatisfied (%)	2.4	10.5
Total (N)	85	19

G4m: Satisfaction: Support with dealing with student concerns	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	21.4	10.5
3: Satisfied (%)	67.1	78.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	8.6	10.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.9	.
Total (N)	70	19

G4n: Satisfaction: Support for technology transfer	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	12.0	14.3
3: Satisfied (%)	60.0	42.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	22.0	14.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.0	28.6
Total (N)	50	7

G5: Assignment of formal mentor	Male	Female
Yes (%)	18.4	52.4
No (%)	79.3	47.6
Don't know (%)	2.3	.
Total (N)	87	21

G6: Mentor helpfulness	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	2.9
4: Very helpful (%)	50.0	45.5
3: Somewhat helpful (%)	31.3	9.1
2: Not very helpful (%)	12.5	36.4
1: Not at all helpful (%)	6.3	9.1
Total (N)	16	11

G7a: Satisfaction: Pre-award support from college for grant/contract	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	26.7	42.9
3: Satisfied (%)	58.7	42.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	8.0	7.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.7	7.1
Total (N)	75	14

G7b: Satisfaction: Post-award support from college for grant/contract	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	16.2	.
3: Satisfied (%)	55.4	76.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	18.9	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	9.5	23.1
Total (N)	74	13

G7c: Satisfaction: Pre-award University support for grant/contract	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	11.5	25.0
3: Satisfied (%)	62.3	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	19.7	25.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.6	.
Total (N)	61	8

G7d: Satisfaction: Post-award University support for grant/contract	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	9.7	.
3: Satisfied (%)	51.6	55.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	25.8	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	12.9	11.1
Total (N)	62	9

G7e: Satisfaction: Allocation of indirect grant costs to investigator	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.7	2.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	2.9	10.0
3: Satisfied (%)	22.9	30.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	17.1	20.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	57.1	40.0
Total (N)	70	10

G7f: Satisfaction: Allocation of indirect grant costs to department	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.7	1.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	12.5
3: Satisfied (%)	22.7	.
2: Dissatisfied (%)	24.2	37.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	53.0	50.0
Total (N)	66	8

G7g: Satisfaction: PI control over indirect cost allocation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.7	1.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	4.2	11.1
3: Satisfied (%)	21.1	.
2: Dissatisfied (%)	16.9	44.4
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	57.7	44.4
Total (N)	71	9

Back to Top

Section H: Performance Review, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure

H1: Faculty performance review standards are clearly stated	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	29.1	22.7
3: Agree (%)	55.8	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	12.8	27.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.3	.
Total (N)	86	22

H2: Faculty performance review procedures are clearly stated	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	31.4	36.4
3: Agree (%)	62.8	36.4
2: Disagree (%)	3.5	22.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.3	4.5
Total (N)	86	22

H3: SME is consistent with departmental vision	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	32.9	28.6
3: Agree (%)	63.0	71.4
2: Disagree (%)	2.7	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.4	.
Total (N)	73	14

H4: SME is consistent with departmental promotion standards	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	35.8	35.7
3: Agree (%)	61.2	64.3
2: Disagree (%)	1.5	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.5	.
Total (N)	67	14

H5a: Performance Review feedback appropriately based on SME	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	24.2	50.0
3: Agree (%)	62.9	41.7
2: Disagree (%)	11.3	8.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.6	.
Total (N)	62	12

H5b: Performance Review feedback helpful for professional Development	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	13.0	33.3
3: Agree (%)	55.1	46.7
2: Disagree (%)	27.5	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.3	.
Total (N)	69	15

H5c: Performance Review feedback corresponds with my perceptions of own performance	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	21.1	46.7
3: Agree (%)	62.0	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	11.3	13.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.6	.
Total (N)	71	15

H5d: Performance Review feedback helps understand relation to other faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	14.3	13.3
3: Agree (%)	54.3	26.7
2: Disagree (%)	22.9	60.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.6	.
Total (N)	70	15

H5e: Feedback given appropriate weight in merit raises	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	13.2	26.7
3: Agree (%)	67.6	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	11.8	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.4	.
Total (N)	68	15

H6: Understanding of current Academic Tenure Policy	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.5
4: Very well (%)	19.8	9.5
3: Fairly well (%)	53.5	42.9
2: Not very well (%)	16.3	33.3
1: Not at all (%)	10.5	14.3
Total (N)	86	21

H7_1: Participated in RPT process as candidate	Male	Female
No (%)	47.7	40.9
Yes (%)	52.3	59.1
Total (N)	86	22

H7_2: Participated in RPT process as voter	Male	Female
No (%)	27.9	63.6
Yes (%)	72.1	36.4
Total (N)	86	22

H7_3: Participated in RPT process as review committee member	Male	Female
No (%)	54.7	86.4
Yes (%)	45.3	13.6
Total (N)	86	22

H7_4: Have never participated in RPT process	Male	Female
No (%)	86.0	77.3
Yes (%)	14.0	22.7
Total (N)	86	22

H8: Understand dept RPT standards	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	2.8
4: Very well (%)	47.7	14.3
3: Fairly well (%)	37.2	57.1
2: Not very well (%)	11.6	23.8
1: Not at all (%)	3.5	4.8
Total (N)	86	21

H9: Understand dept RPT procedures	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.0
4: Very well (%)	48.8	30.0
3: Fairly well (%)	43.0	40.0
2: Not very well (%)	5.8	25.0
1: Not at all (%)	2.3	5.0
Total (N)	86	20

H10: Departmental RPT standards applied consistently/fairly	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	27.6	14.3
3: Agree (%)	60.5	57.1
2: Disagree (%)	10.5	21.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.3	7.1
Total (N)	76	14

H11: Departmental RPT procedures applied consistently/fairly	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	30.8	28.6
3: Agree (%)	59.0	35.7
2: Disagree (%)	9.0	28.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.3	7.1
Total (N)	78	14

H12a: Sufficient resources for teaching/mentoring students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	12.7	12.5
3: Agree (%)	53.2	62.5
2: Disagree (%)	26.6	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.6	.
Total (N)	79	16

H12b: Sufficient resources for discovery of knowledge	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	5.8	8.3
3: Agree (%)	52.2	83.3
2: Disagree (%)	30.4	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	11.6	8.3
Total (N)	69	12

H12c: Sufficient resources for creative artistry and literature	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	8.3	33.3
3: Agree (%)	66.7	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	16.7	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.3	.
Total (N)	12	3

H12d: Sufficient resources for tech/managerial innovation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	7.3	11.1
3: Agree (%)	58.5	55.6
2: Disagree (%)	24.4	22.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.8	11.1
Total (N)	41	9

H12e: Sufficient resources for extension/engagement	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	5.6	28.6
3: Agree (%)	63.9	57.1
2: Disagree (%)	16.7	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	13.9	14.3
Total (N)	36	7

H12f: Sufficient resources for professional service	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.2	16.7
3: Agree (%)	52.5	41.7
2: Disagree (%)	28.8	41.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.5	.
Total (N)	59	12

H13a: Department rewards teaching/mentoring of students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	13.9	16.7
3: Agree (%)	53.2	55.6
2: Disagree (%)	25.3	27.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.6	.
Total (N)	79	18

H13b: Department rewards discovery of knowledge	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	31.8	33.3
3: Agree (%)	51.5	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	15.2	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.5	.
Total (N)	66	15

H13c: Department rewards creative artistry and literature	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	18.2	20.0
3: Agree (%)	45.5	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	18.2	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	18.2	40.0
Total (N)	11	5

H13d: Department rewards tech/managerial innovation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	13.9	9.1
3: Agree (%)	61.1	63.6
2: Disagree (%)	19.4	18.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.6	9.1
Total (N)	36	11

H13e: Department rewards extension/engagement	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	17.0	18.2
3: Agree (%)	59.6	27.3
2: Disagree (%)	14.9	36.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.5	18.2
Total (N)	47	11

H13f: Department rewards professional service	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	13.6	11.8
3: Agree (%)	60.6	58.8
2: Disagree (%)	22.7	29.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.0	.
Total (N)	66	17

Back to Top

Section I: Post-Tenure Review

I1_1: No experience with PTR	Male	Female
Has experience (%)	73.8	38.9
No experience (%)	26.3	61.1
Total (N)	80	18

I1_2: Have had PTR Comprehensive Review	Male	Female
No (%)	37.5	72.2
Yes (%)	62.5	27.8
Total (N)	80	18

I1_3: Have served on PTR committee	Male	Female
No (%)	63.8	88.9
Yes (%)	36.3	11.1
Total (N)	80	18

I1_4: Have been dept/college administrator in PTR process	Male	Female
No (%)	90.0	100.0
Yes (%)	10.0	.
Total (N)	80	18

I1_5: Had other PTR experience	Male	Female
No (%)	97.5	100.0
Yes (%)	2.5	.
Total (N)	80	18

I2a: Easy to find PTR information on NCSU website	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.3	12.5
3: Agree (%)	74.1	62.5
2: Disagree (%)	13.8	12.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.7	12.5
Total (N)	58	8

I2b: PTR process known/understood in department	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	12.5	25.0
3: Agree (%)	68.8	25.0
2: Disagree (%)	17.2	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.6	.
Total (N)	64	8

I2c: Departmental PTR procedures are clear	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	14.3	22.2
3: Agree (%)	74.6	55.6
2: Disagree (%)	9.5	22.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.6	.
Total (N)	63	9

I2d: Departmental PTR standards are clear	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	11.3	22.2
3: Agree (%)	66.1	44.4
2: Disagree (%)	17.7	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.8	.
Total (N)	62	9

I2e: Departmental PTR procedures are followed equitably	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	20.4	28.6
3: Agree (%)	77.8	71.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.9	.
Total (N)	54	7

I2f: Departmental PTR standards are applied fairly	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	21.2	33.3
3: Agree (%)	75.0	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	1.9	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.9	.
Total (N)	52	6

I2g: Dept PTR committee members are well prepared and trained	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	12.8	40.0
3: Agree (%)	66.0	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	17.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.3	.
Total (N)	47	5

I3: Overall satisfaction with PTR process	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	8.2	20.0
3: Satisfied (%)	60.7	60.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	18.0	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	13.1	20.0
Total (N)	61	5

Back to Top

Section J: Pay and Compensation

J1a: My salary is competitive within my department	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	11.8	.
3: Agree (%)	54.4	52.9
2: Disagree (%)	22.1	41.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	11.8	5.9
Total (N)	68	17

J1b: My salary is competitive within my college	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	4.4	.
3: Agree (%)	46.7	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	33.3	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	15.6	25.0
Total (N)	45	12

J1c: My salary is competitive within NC State	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	4.3	.
3: Agree (%)	43.5	41.7
2: Disagree (%)	39.1	16.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	13.0	41.7
Total (N)	46	12

J1d: My salary is competitive within UNC system	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.1	2.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	2.3	.
3: Agree (%)	34.9	30.8
2: Disagree (%)	32.6	46.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	30.2	23.1
Total (N)	43	13

J1e: My salary is competitive within discipline at comparable institutions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.0	1.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	5.0	.
3: Agree (%)	23.3	23.5
2: Disagree (%)	36.7	41.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	35.0	35.3
Total (N)	60	17

J2: Understand how faculty salaries determined	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	1.9
4: Very well (%)	21.4	.
3: Fairly well (%)	46.4	36.4
2: Not very well (%)	16.7	13.6
1: Not at all (%)	15.5	50.0
Total (N)	84	22

J3: My department links salary increase to meritorious performance	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	23.0	16.7
3: Agree (%)	59.5	55.6
2: Disagree (%)	10.8	27.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.8	.
Total (N)	74	18

J4: I have access to benefits information	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	28.0	40.9
3: Agree (%)	64.6	54.5
2: Disagree (%)	6.1	4.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.2	.
Total (N)	82	22

J5: Healthcare benefits are competitive with other institutions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.0	2.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	2.7	21.4
3: Agree (%)	27.4	14.3
2: Disagree (%)	34.2	28.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	35.6	35.7
Total (N)	73	14

J6: Retirement programs are competitive with other institutions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	6.5	14.3
3: Agree (%)	43.5	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	30.6	21.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	19.4	14.3
Total (N)	62	14

J7: Voluntary benefits programs are competitive with other institutions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	2.0	16.7
3: Agree (%)	62.0	83.3
2: Disagree (%)	18.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	18.0	.
Total (N)	50	6

J8: I am satisfied with my compensation at NC State	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	3.6	10.0
3: Agree (%)	51.2	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	34.5	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	10.7	.
Total (N)	84	20

J9: Departmental environment enables work/personal life balance	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	17.3	10.5
3: Agree (%)	56.8	57.9
2: Disagree (%)	17.3	15.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.6	15.8
Total (N)	81	19

J10: NCSU environment enables work/personal life balance	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	7.5	.
3: Agree (%)	68.8	63.2
2: Disagree (%)	13.8	21.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	10.0	15.8
Total (N)	80	19

J11a: Importance of flexible work hours	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	4.0
4: Very important (%)	68.7	100.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	21.7	.
2: Not very important (%)	4.8	.
1: Not at all important (%)	4.8	.
Total (N)	83	20

J11b: Importance of maternity/paternity leave	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	4.0
4: Very important (%)	68.3	95.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	24.4	5.0
2: Not very important (%)	3.7	.
1: Not at all important (%)	3.7	.
Total (N)	82	20

J11c: Importance of family leave time	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	3.9
4: Very important (%)	64.2	90.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	29.6	10.0
2: Not very important (%)	4.9	.
1: Not at all important (%)	1.2	.
Total (N)	81	20

J11d: Importance of altering tenure clock for family concerns	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	4.0
4: Very important (%)	64.6	95.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	24.4	5.0
2: Not very important (%)	8.5	.
1: Not at all important (%)	2.4	.
Total (N)	82	20

J11e: Importance of childcare facility on or near campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.9
4: Very important (%)	42.7	90.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	40.2	10.0
2: Not very important (%)	11.0	.
1: Not at all important (%)	6.1	.
Total (N)	82	20

J11f: Importance of tuition remission for dependents	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.5
4: Very important (%)	56.6	70.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	25.3	15.0
2: Not very important (%)	13.3	10.0
1: Not at all important (%)	4.8	5.0
Total (N)	83	20

Back to Top

Section K: Campus Infrastructure/Physical Environment

K1: I have sufficient clerical/admin support in my dept	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	19.0	9.1
3: Agree (%)	39.3	54.5
2: Disagree (%)	29.8	27.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	11.9	9.1
Total (N)	84	22

K2: I have sufficient tech assistance	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	16.7	13.6
3: Agree (%)	44.0	31.8
2: Disagree (%)	26.2	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	13.1	4.5
Total (N)	84	22

K3: There is sufficient support staff in my college	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	14.3	5.3
3: Agree (%)	51.2	47.4
2: Disagree (%)	20.2	42.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	14.3	5.3
Total (N)	84	19

K4a: Satisfaction with office space	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	35.7	31.8
3: Satisfied (%)	46.4	59.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	13.1	9.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	4.8	.
Total (N)	84	22

K4b: Satisfaction with lab space	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	26.3	12.5
3: Satisfied (%)	44.7	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	18.4	37.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	10.5	.
Total (N)	38	8

K4c: Satisfaction with classrooms in which you teach	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	9.8	.
3: Satisfied (%)	47.6	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	29.3	40.9
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	13.4	9.1
Total (N)	82	22

K4d: Satisfaction with labs in which you teach	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	15.2	37.5
3: Satisfied (%)	45.5	25.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	33.3	37.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.1	.
Total (N)	33	8

K4e: Satisfaction with maintenance of building in which you work	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	13.3	4.8
3: Satisfied (%)	38.6	52.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	27.7	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	20.5	9.5
Total (N)	83	21

K4f: Satisfaction with infrastructure of bldgs in which you work	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	10.8	.
3: Satisfied (%)	36.1	45.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	33.7	45.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	19.3	9.1
Total (N)	83	22

K4g: Satisfaction with availability of up-to-date equipment	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	13.9	9.5
3: Satisfied (%)	49.4	47.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	21.5	28.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	15.2	14.3
Total (N)	79	21

K4h: Satisfaction with availability of office supplies	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	19.5	18.2
3: Satisfied (%)	64.6	59.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	11.0	18.2
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	4.9	4.5
Total (N)	82	22

K4i: Satisfaction with availability of informal meeting space	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	16.0	4.5
3: Satisfied (%)	43.2	31.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	28.4	45.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	12.3	18.2
Total (N)	81	22

K4j: Satisfaction with dining options on campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	1.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.2	.
3: Satisfied (%)	33.8	31.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	44.6	31.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	15.4	37.5
Total (N)	65	16

K4k: Satisfaction with availability of parking	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	4.9	9.5
3: Satisfied (%)	51.9	52.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	30.9	14.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	12.3	23.8
Total (N)	81	21

K4l: Satisfaction with cost of parking	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.2	2.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	3.7	5.0
3: Satisfied (%)	42.0	35.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	27.2	35.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	27.2	25.0
Total (N)	81	20

K4m: Satisfaction with Wolfline	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	9.7	14.3
3: Satisfied (%)	61.3	71.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	29.0	14.3
Total (N)	31	7

K4n: Satisfaction with commute between Centennial and main	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	1.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	9.4	.
3: Satisfied (%)	32.1	25.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	35.8	41.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	22.6	33.3
Total (N)	53	12

K4o: Satisfaction with campus safety	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.8	.
3: Satisfied (%)	73.0	93.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	14.9	6.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.4	.
Total (N)	74	16

K4p: Satisfaction with campus aesthetics	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	4.9	.
3: Satisfied (%)	46.9	72.2
2: Dissatisfied (%)	38.3	27.8
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	9.9	.
Total (N)	81	18

K4q: Satisfaction with upkeep of campus grounds	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	8.6	.
3: Satisfied (%)	71.6	82.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	16.0	17.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	3.7	.
Total (N)	81	17

K4r: Satisfaction with amount of green space	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	3.7	.
3: Satisfied (%)	58.0	55.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	29.6	40.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	8.6	5.0
Total (N)	81	20

K5a: Satisfaction with energy conservation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	4.5	6.7
3: Satisfied (%)	66.7	40.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	21.2	53.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	7.6	.
Total (N)	66	15

K5b: Satisfaction with water conservation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	5.5	7.1
3: Satisfied (%)	74.5	57.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	18.2	35.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	1.8	.
Total (N)	55	14

K5c: Satisfaction with recycling efforts	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	14.7	27.8
3: Satisfied (%)	74.7	61.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	6.7	11.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	4.0	.
Total (N)	75	18

K5d: Satisfaction with alternative transportation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	5.0	8.3
3: Satisfied (%)	61.7	58.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	30.0	25.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	3.3	8.3
Total (N)	60	12

K5e: Satisfaction with green building practices	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	2.6	12.5
3: Satisfied (%)	60.5	62.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	28.9	25.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	7.9	.
Total (N)	38	8

K5f: Satisfaction with use of recycled-content resources	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	5.1	22.2
3: Satisfied (%)	76.9	55.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	15.4	22.2
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.6	.
Total (N)	39	9

K6: Interest in hotel/conference center on Centennial Campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.6
4: A lot (%)	26.5	30.0
3: Some (%)	33.7	30.0
2: A little (%)	19.3	10.0
1: None at all (%)	20.5	30.0
Total (N)	83	20

K7: Likelihood of using conference center on Centennial Campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.7
4: Very likely (%)	26.2	31.6
3: Somewhat likely (%)	35.7	31.6
2: Not very likely (%)	27.4	15.8
1: Not at all likely (%)	10.7	21.1
Total (N)	84	19

Back to Top

Section L: Recreation/Wellness

L1: Satisfaction with recreation activities on campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	16.9	10.5
3: Satisfied (%)	68.7	78.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	13.3	10.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	1.2	.
Total (N)	83	19

L2: Satisfaction with cultural activities on campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.2	.
3: Satisfied (%)	67.9	63.2
2: Dissatisfied (%)	21.0	36.8
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	4.9	.
Total (N)	81	19

L3a: Satisfaction with Carmichael Gymnasium	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	24.6	10.0
3: Satisfied (%)	59.0	80.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	14.8	10.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	1.6	.
Total (N)	61	10

L3b: Satisfaction with recreation space around campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	15.3	14.3
3: Satisfied (%)	66.1	85.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	16.9	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	1.7	.
Total (N)	59	7

L3c: Satisfaction with organized Campus Recreation Activities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	13.3	.
3: Satisfied (%)	76.7	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	10.0	.
Total (N)	30	6

L3d: Satisfaction with ARTS NC State programs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	12.2	.
3: Satisfied (%)	69.4	90.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	18.4	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	10.0
Total (N)	49	10

L3e: Satisfaction with Wolfpack athletic events	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	18.4	.
3: Satisfied (%)	67.3	80.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	6.1	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	8.2	20.0
Total (N)	49	5

L4a: How often use Carmichael Gymnasium	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	2.6
Once a week or more (%)	33.3	23.8
A few times a month (%)	9.9	9.5
A few times a semester (%)	11.1	.
Once a semester (%)	6.2	.
Once a year (%)	7.4	.
Never (%)	32.1	66.7
Total (N)	81	21

L4b: How often use recreational space around campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	1.8
Once a week or more (%)	12.3	4.8
A few times a month (%)	11.1	14.3
A few times a semester (%)	18.5	.
Once a semester (%)	9.9	.
Once a year (%)	12.3	.
Never (%)	35.8	81.0
Total (N)	81	21

L4c: How often participate in organized Campus Recreation Activities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.6	1.5
Once a week or more (%)	2.6	5.0
A few times a month (%)	2.6	.
A few times a semester (%)	7.7	5.0
Once a semester (%)	5.1	5.0
Once a year (%)	3.8	.
Never (%)	78.2	85.0
Total (N)	78	20

L4d: How often attend ARTS NC State programs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.1
Once a week or more (%)	3.7	.
A few times a month (%)	6.2	4.8
A few times a semester (%)	19.8	9.5
Once a semester (%)	19.8	23.8
Once a year (%)	14.8	14.3
Never (%)	35.8	47.6
Total (N)	81	21

L4e: How often attend Wolfpack athletic events	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	1.3
Once a week or more (%)	2.5	.
A few times a month (%)	3.8	.
A few times a semester (%)	18.8	4.8
Once a semester (%)	12.5	4.8
Once a year (%)	17.5	9.5
Never (%)	45.0	81.0
Total (N)	80	21

L5: Interest in designated faculty-only dining facility	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	3.0
4: A great deal (%)	31.7	40.0
3: Some (%)	20.7	35.0
2: A little (%)	14.6	5.0
1: None at all (%)	32.9	20.0
Total (N)	82	20

L6: Likelihood of using gym on Centennial campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.8	1.6
4: Very likely (%)	13.4	9.5
3: Somewhat likely (%)	12.2	.
2: Not very likely (%)	14.6	28.6
1: Not at all likely (%)	59.8	61.9
Total (N)	82	21

Back to Top

Section M: Work Activities

M1: Total hours per week spent performing job-related work (collapsed)	Male	Female
Mean # Hrs Work	58.3	57.8
more than 60 hrs (%)	25.3	23.8
51 to 60 hrs (%)	39.8	47.6
41 to 50 hrs (%)	30.1	19.0
40 hrs or less (%)	4.8	9.5
Total (N)	83	21

M2A: Proportion of total hours spent on teaching/mentoring	Male	Female
Mean % of Time on Activity	36.3	44.6
more than 50% of time (%)	15.7	31.8
26% to 50% of time (%)	55.4	54.5
11% to 25% of time (%)	21.7	9.1
6% to 10% of time (%)	3.6	.
1% to 5% of time (%)	1.2	.
0% of time (%)	2.4	4.5
Total (N)	83	22

M2a_1r: Includes teaching (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	Male	Female
No (%)	16.0	14.3
Yes (%)	84.0	85.7
Total (N)	81	21

M2a_2r: Includes professional development to improve teaching (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	Male	Female
No (%)	67.9	52.4
Yes (%)	32.1	47.6
Total (N)	81	21

M2a_3r: Includes research projects with students (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	Male	Female
No (%)	32.1	38.1
Yes (%)	67.9	61.9
Total (N)	81	21

M2a_4r: Includes supervising internships/field experiences (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	Male	Female
No (%)	87.7	85.7
Yes (%)	12.3	14.3
Total (N)	81	21

M2a_5r: Includes student thesis/dissertation committee work (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	Male	Female
No (%)	33.3	57.1
Yes (%)	66.7	42.9
Total (N)	81	21

M2B: Proportion of total hours spent advising students	Male	Female
Mean % of Time on Activity	7.3	6.8
26% to 50% of time (%)	2.4	4.5
11% to 25% of time (%)	9.6	13.6
6% to 10% of time (%)	22.9	18.2
1% to 5% of time (%)	50.6	31.8
0% of time (%)	14.5	31.8
Total (N)	83	22

M2b_1r: Includes formal advising (among those reporting time spent on advising)	Male	Female
No (%)	25.4	26.7
Yes (%)	74.6	73.3
Total (N)	71	15

M2b_2r: Includes informal advising (among those reporting time spent on advising)	Male	Female
No (%)	50.7	40.0
Yes (%)	49.3	60.0
Total (N)	71	15

M2C: Proportion of total hours spent on research/scholarly Activities	Male	Female
Mean % of Time on Activity	33.9	28.1
more than 50% of time (%)	12.0	4.5
26% to 50% of time (%)	50.6	54.5
11% to 25% of time (%)	19.3	18.2
6% to 10% of time (%)	4.8	4.5
1% to 5% of time (%)	4.8	.
0% of time (%)	8.4	18.2
Total (N)	83	22

M2D: Proportion of total hours spent on creative artistry/literature	Male	Female
Mean % of Time on Activity	0.2	0.2
6% to 10% of time (%)	1.2	.
1% to 5% of time (%)	1.2	4.5
0% of time (%)	97.6	95.5
Total (N)	83	22

M2E: Proportion of total hours spent on extension/engagement/econ dev	Male	Female
Mean % of Time on Activity	1.8	2.0
more than 50% of time (%)	1.2	.
26% to 50% of time (%)	.	4.5
11% to 25% of time (%)	1.2	.
1% to 5% of time (%)	16.9	13.6
0% of time (%)	80.7	81.8
Total (N)	83	22

M2e_1r: Includes service learning teaching/mentoring (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	Male	Female
No (%)	81.3	50.0
Yes (%)	18.8	50.0
Total (N)	16	4

M2e_2r: Includes extension education/non-credit programs (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	Male	Female
No (%)	68.8	50.0
Yes (%)	31.3	50.0
Total (N)	16	4

M2e_3r: Includes economic development training/tech assistance (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	Male	Female
No (%)	87.5	100.0
Yes (%)	12.5	.
Total (N)	16	4

M2e_4r: Includes partnering with private sector - job/investment creation (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	Male	Female
No (%)	68.8	75.0
Yes (%)	31.3	25.0
Total (N)	16	4

M2e_5r: Public service grants/contracts (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	Male	Female
No (%)	87.5	50.0
Yes (%)	12.5	50.0
Total (N)	16	4

M2F: Proportion of total hours spent on service work	Male	Female
Mean % of Time on Activity	10.2	11.7
26% to 50% of time (%)	3.6	9.1
11% to 25% of time (%)	24.1	31.8
6% to 10% of time (%)	31.3	13.6
1% to 5% of time (%)	27.7	27.3
0% of time (%)	13.3	18.2
Total (N)	83	22

M2f_1r: Includes advising student groups (among those reporting time spent on service work)	Male	Female
No (%)	86.1	83.3
Yes (%)	13.9	16.7
Total (N)	72	18

M2f_2r: Includes dept/college/university committees (among those reporting time spent on service work)	Male	Female
No (%)	20.8	16.7
Yes (%)	79.2	83.3
Total (N)	72	18

M2f_3r: Includes professional service (among those reporting time spent on service work)	Male	Female
No (%)	40.3	33.3
Yes (%)	59.7	66.7
Total (N)	72	18

M2f_4r: Includes academic program assessment activities (among those reporting time spent on service work)	Male	Female
No (%)	75.0	100.0
Yes (%)	25.0	.
Total (N)	72	18

M2f_5r: Includes other university service (among those reporting time spent on service work)	Male	Female
No (%)	63.9	83.3
Yes (%)	36.1	16.7
Total (N)	72	18

M2G: Proportion of total hours spent on tech/managerial innovation	Male	Female
Mean % of Time on Activity	0.6	0.2
6% to 10% of time (%)	3.6	.
1% to 5% of time (%)	7.2	4.5
0% of time (%)	89.2	95.5
Total (N)	83	22

M2H: Proportion of total hours spent on dept/college admin duties	Male	Female
Mean % of Time on Activity	7.6	2.0
more than 50% of time (%)	3.6	.
26% to 50% of time (%)	4.8	4.5
11% to 25% of time (%)	8.4	.
6% to 10% of time (%)	10.8	4.5
1% to 5% of time (%)	16.9	.
0% of time (%)	55.4	90.9
Total (N)	83	22

M3_1: Worked summer at NCSU without overload pay	Male	Female
No (%)	39.8	54.5
Yes (%)	60.2	45.5
Total (N)	83	22

M3_2: Taught at NCSU on overload basis	Male	Female
No (%)	83.1	86.4
Yes (%)	16.9	13.6
Total (N)	83	22

M3_3: Taught NCSU distance education class	Male	Female
No (%)	85.5	90.9
Yes (%)	14.5	9.1
Total (N)	83	22

M3_4: Taught for another academic institution	Male	Female
No (%)	90.4	95.5
Yes (%)	9.6	4.5
Total (N)	83	22

M3_5: Did outside consulting/freelance for pay	Male	Female
No (%)	63.9	86.4
Yes (%)	36.1	13.6
Total (N)	83	22

M3_6: Did outside consulting/freelance without pay	Male	Female
No (%)	65.1	86.4
Yes (%)	34.9	13.6
Total (N)	83	22

M3_7: Had other secondary employment	Male	Female
No (%)	98.8	95.5
Yes (%)	1.2	4.5
Total (N)	83	22

M4: Frequency of volunteer work past 2 years	Male	Female
Never (%)	19.8	19.0
A few times (%)	49.4	28.6
About once per month (%)	12.3	14.3
Two or three times per month (%)	11.1	19.0
At least once per week (%)	7.4	19.0
Total (N)	81	21

M5: Frequency of public policy work past 5 years	Male	Female
Never (%)	54.9	70.0
Once or twice (%)	23.2	20.0
Three to five times (%)	17.1	10.0
Six to ten times (%)	1.2	.
More than 10 times (%)	3.7	.
Total (N)	82	20

M6: Management of work-related demands of past 2 years	Male	Female
1: Managing everything just fine (%)	14.6	.
2 (%)	26.8	23.8
3 (%)	24.4	28.6
4 (%)	25.6	38.1
5: Completely overwhelmed (%)	8.5	9.5
Total (N)	82	21

M7: Change how you spend your work time	Male	Female
I would change how I spent time (%)	61.3	72.2
I would not change a thing (%)	38.7	27.8
Total (N)	75	18

Back to Top

Section N: Conclusions/Overall Satisfaction

N1: Satisfaction with your "fit" in department	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	28.9	14.3
3: Satisfied (%)	50.6	47.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	19.3	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	1.2	4.8
Total (N)	83	21

N2: I generally feel valued in my department	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	26.5	23.8
3: Agree (%)	53.0	42.9
2: Disagree (%)	16.9	19.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.6	14.3
Total (N)	83	21

N3a: I am treated with respect by my students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	54.9	57.1
3: Agree (%)	42.7	42.9
2: Disagree (%)	2.4	.
Total (N)	82	21

N3b: I am treated with respect by dept support staff	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	59.0	57.1
3: Agree (%)	36.1	38.1
2: Disagree (%)	3.6	4.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.2	.
Total (N)	83	21

N3c: I am treated with respect faculty in my dept	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	42.2	19.0
3: Agree (%)	54.2	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	3.6	14.3
Total (N)	83	21

N3d: I am treated with respect by NCSU administrators	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	30.9	41.2
3: Agree (%)	54.3	41.2
2: Disagree (%)	11.1	17.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.7	.
Total (N)	81	17

N4: I would recommend my department as a good place to work	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	33.7	21.1
3: Agree (%)	48.2	52.6
2: Disagree (%)	16.9	15.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.2	10.5
Total (N)	83	19

N5a: Amount of stress due to reappointment, promotion or tenure	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.9
4: A great deal (%)	18.8	29.4
3: Some (%)	29.0	41.2
2: A little (%)	14.5	23.5
1: None at all (%)	37.7	5.9
Total (N)	69	17

N5b: Amount of stress from research/publication demands	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.4
4: A great deal (%)	28.8	58.8
3: Some (%)	46.3	23.5
2: A little (%)	12.5	17.6
1: None at all (%)	12.5	.
Total (N)	80	17

N5c: Amount of stress from professional Development	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	3.1
4: A great deal (%)	16.7	44.4
3: Some (%)	33.3	27.8
2: A little (%)	24.4	16.7
1: None at all (%)	25.6	11.1
Total (N)	78	18

N5d: Amount of stress from institutional procedures	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.6
4: A great deal (%)	16.7	22.2
3: Some (%)	39.7	27.8
2: A little (%)	23.1	33.3
1: None at all (%)	20.5	16.7
Total (N)	78	18

N5e: Amount of stress from committee work	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.8
4: A great deal (%)	13.4	26.3
3: Some (%)	41.5	36.8
2: A little (%)	28.0	26.3
1: None at all (%)	17.1	10.5
Total (N)	82	19

N5f: Amount of stress from relationships with students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.9	2.4
4: A great deal (%)	3.7	10.5
3: Some (%)	17.3	36.8
2: A little (%)	42.0	36.8
1: None at all (%)	37.0	15.8
Total (N)	81	19

N5g: Amount of stress from relationships with faculty in dept	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.0	2.4
4: A great deal (%)	6.2	15.8
3: Some (%)	24.7	31.6
2: A little (%)	32.1	31.6
1: None at all (%)	37.0	21.1
Total (N)	81	19

N5h: Amount of stress from relationships w/dept admin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.2	2.5
4: A great deal (%)	12.5	21.1
3: Some (%)	25.0	31.6
2: A little (%)	31.3	26.3
1: None at all (%)	31.3	21.1
Total (N)	80	19

N5i: Amount of stress from relationships w/college admin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.1	1.8
4: A great deal (%)	15.4	.
3: Some (%)	21.8	21.4
2: A little (%)	20.5	35.7
1: None at all (%)	42.3	42.9
Total (N)	78	14

N5j: Amount of stress from workload	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.2
4: A great deal (%)	34.1	45.0
3: Some (%)	31.7	30.0
2: A little (%)	19.5	25.0
1: None at all (%)	14.6	.
Total (N)	82	20

N5k: Amount of stress from work/personal life balance	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	3.3
4: A great deal (%)	30.5	55.0
3: Some (%)	37.8	20.0
2: A little (%)	12.2	20.0
1: None at all (%)	19.5	5.0
Total (N)	82	20

N5l: Amount of stress from working with under-prepared students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	3.1
4: A great deal (%)	17.1	35.0
3: Some (%)	40.2	40.0
2: A little (%)	35.4	20.0
1: None at all (%)	7.3	5.0
Total (N)	82	20

N5m: Amount of stress from self-assessment Activities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.2	2.3
4: A great deal (%)	9.8	11.1
3: Some (%)	24.4	38.9
2: A little (%)	41.5	22.2
1: None at all (%)	24.4	27.8
Total (N)	82	18

N5n: Amount of stress from program assessment requirements	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.2	2.0
4: A great deal (%)	18.3	6.7
3: Some (%)	16.9	20.0
2: A little (%)	31.0	40.0
1: None at all (%)	33.8	33.3
Total (N)	71	15

N6: Overall satisfaction with NCSU	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	13.3	5.0
3: Satisfied (%)	61.4	55.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	25.3	35.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	5.0
Total (N)	83	20

N7: More or less satisfied with NC State, compared to 5 yrs ago	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	3.0
A lot more satisfied now (%)	6.0	10.5
Somewhat more satisfied now (%)	18.1	21.1
Neither more or less satisfied now (%)	30.1	36.8
Somewhat less satisfied now (%)	30.1	21.1
A lot less satisfied now (%)	15.7	10.5
Total (N)	83	19

N8: Ever considered leaving NC State for another university	Male	Female
No - never considered leaving (%)	15.7	31.6
Yes - not very seriously (%)	30.1	5.3
Yes - somewhat seriously (%)	28.9	10.5
Yes - very seriously (%)	25.3	52.6
Total (N)	83	19

N10: Ever considered leaving academe, since coming to NC State	Male	Female
No - never considered leaving (%)	61.4	35.0
Yes - not very seriously (%)	13.3	20.0
Yes - somewhat seriously (%)	14.5	30.0
Yes - very seriously (%)	10.8	15.0
Total (N)	83	20

Back to top

For more information on the NC State University 2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey contact:
Dr. Nancy Whelchel, Associate Director for Survey Research
Office of Institutional Planning and Research
Box 7002
NCSU
Phone: (919) 515-4184
Email: ncsu_surveys@ncsu.edu

Posted: April, 2007

Return to PAMS Results Index

Return to 2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey Table of Contents Page