North Carolina State University
2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey:

Results for the College of Veterinary Medicine
by Number of Years Employed at NC State

To skip directly to a particular section, select the section below.

Section B: Image and Vision	Section I: Post-Tenure Review
Section C: Leadership	Section J: Pay and Compensation
Section D: Faculty-Administration Relationships	Section K: Campus Infrastructure/Physical Environment
Section E: Diversity/Multiculturalism	Section L: Recreation/Wellness
Section F: Working Relationships	Section M: Work Activities
Section G: Faculty Support & Professional Development	Section N: Conclusions/Overall Satisfaction
Section H: Performance Review, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure

To download a Microsoft Word version of this document, click here.

A2: Ever held an administrative position	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
..... No (%)	81.3	84.0	72.7	100.0
..... Yes (%)	18.8	16.0	27.3	.
Total (N)	16	25	33	1

Back to Top

Section B: Image and Vision

B1a: Department doing good job of recruiting faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.1	3.1	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	37.5	29.2	30.3	.
3: Agree (%)	31.3	50.0	51.5	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	31.3	20.8	15.2	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	3.0	.
Total (N)	16	24	33	1

B1b: Department creating culture where faculty can develop to full potential	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.1	2.9	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.0	32.0	18.8	.
3: Agree (%)	56.3	48.0	53.1	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	18.8	16.0	25.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	4.0	3.1	.
Total (N)	16	25	32	1

B1c: Department retaining most effective and productive faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.6	2.6	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	6.7	8.0	9.1	.
3: Agree (%)	53.3	60.0	45.5	.
2: Disagree (%)	33.3	16.0	39.4	100.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.7	16.0	6.1	.
Total (N)	15	25	33	1

B2a: Department national reputation for undergraduate educ	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	4.5	4.3	4.0	4.0
5: Very strong (%)	50.0	33.3	28.6	.
4: Strong (%)	50.0	66.7	42.9	100.0
3: Average (%)	.	.	28.6	.
Total (N)	2	3	7	1

B2b: Department national reputation for graduate education	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.9	3.6	3.5	3.0
5: Very strong (%)	35.7	24.0	16.1	.
4: Strong (%)	35.7	28.0	32.3	.
3: Average (%)	7.1	36.0	35.5	100.0
2: Weak (%)	21.4	12.0	16.1	.
Total (N)	14	25	31	1

B2c: Department national reputation for research & scholarly activity	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	4.3	4.0	4.0	3.0
5: Very strong (%)	40.0	28.0	24.2	.
4: Strong (%)	46.7	48.0	51.5	.
3: Average (%)	13.3	24.0	24.2	100.0
Total (N)	15	25	33	1

B2d: Department national reputation for creative artistry and literature	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25
Mean Rating	2.3	3.2	3.3
5: Very strong (%)	.	.	25.0
4: Strong (%)	.	50.0	.
3: Average (%)	66.7	33.3	50.0
2: Weak (%)	.	.	25.0
1: Very weak (%)	33.3	16.7	.
Total (N)	3	6	4

B2e: Department national reputation for tech & managerial innovation	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25
Mean Rating	3.1	3.6	3.4
5: Very strong (%)	12.5	.	6.3
4: Strong (%)	25.0	75.0	37.5
3: Average (%)	25.0	16.7	50.0
2: Weak (%)	37.5	.	.
1: Very weak (%)	.	8.3	6.3
Total (N)	8	12	16

B2f: Department national reputation for extension & engagement	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.8	3.9	3.8	3.0
5: Very strong (%)	33.3	26.1	20.0	.
4: Strong (%)	33.3	43.5	44.0	.
3: Average (%)	25.0	26.1	28.0	100.0
2: Weak (%)	.	.	8.0	.
1: Very weak (%)	8.3	4.3	.	.
Total (N)	12	23	25	1

B2g: Department national reputation for contrib to econ Development	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	3.2	3.5	3.0
5: Very strong (%)	10.0	5.9	4.8	.
4: Strong (%)	30.0	29.4	38.1	.
3: Average (%)	30.0	52.9	57.1	100.0
2: Weak (%)	30.0	.	.	.
1: Very weak (%)	.	11.8	.	.
Total (N)	10	17	21	1

B3a: Grade undergraduate majors' ability to meet prog demands	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	4.0	3.0	4.1	4.0
A (%)	.	.	22.2	.
B (%)	100.0	33.3	66.7	100.0
C (%)	.	33.3	11.1	.
D (%)	.	33.3	.	.
Total (N)	2	3	9	1

B3b: Grade graduate student ability to meet prog demands	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.8	4.0	4.2	4.0
A (%)	12.5	20.0	33.3	.
B (%)	68.8	64.0	54.5	100.0
C (%)	12.5	16.0	9.1	.
D (%)	.	.	3.0	.
F (%)	6.3	.	.	.
Total (N)	16	25	33	1

B3c: Grade demonstrated professional ability of faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	4.6	4.6	4.6	4.0
A (%)	62.5	60.0	60.6	.
B (%)	31.3	40.0	39.4	100.0
C (%)	6.3	.	.	.
Total (N)	16	25	33	1

B3d: Grade professional achievement of faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	4.8	4.7	4.5	4.0
A (%)	75.0	68.0	54.5	.
B (%)	25.0	32.0	42.4	100.0
C (%)	.	.	3.0	.
Total (N)	16	25	33	1

B3e: Grade own demonstrated professional ability	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	4.3	4.6	4.5	4.0
A (%)	37.5	60.0	51.5	.
B (%)	50.0	36.0	42.4	100.0
C (%)	12.5	4.0	6.1	.
Total (N)	16	25	33	1

B3f: Grade own professional achievement	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	4.3	4.5	4.3	4.0
A (%)	43.8	52.0	39.4	.
B (%)	37.5	44.0	54.5	100.0
C (%)	18.8	4.0	6.1	.
Total (N)	16	25	33	1

B4: Department's vision for the future	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Clear vision; actively working toward goals (%)	50.0	52.0	39.4	.
Vision with slow progress (%)	37.5	28.0	30.3	100.0
No clear vision (%)	6.3	16.0	21.2	.
Not familiar (%)	6.3	4.0	9.1	.
Total (N)	16	25	33	1

B5: Agreement with department vision for future	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.5	3.1	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	35.7	50.0	30.4	.
3: Agree (%)	57.1	45.0	56.5	.
2: Disagree (%)	7.1	5.0	8.7	100.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	4.3	.
Total (N)	14	20	23	1

B6: College's vision for the future	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Clear vision; actively working toward goals (%)	50.0	56.0	33.3	.
Vision with slow progress (%)	25.0	32.0	48.5	100.0
No clear vision (%)	18.8	4.0	9.1	.
Not familiar (%)	6.3	8.0	9.1	.
Total (N)	16	25	33	1

B7a: Department change in next five years	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Change for the better (%)	62.5	68.0	42.4	100.0
Change for the worse (%)	12.5	4.0	18.2	.
Not really change (%)	25.0	28.0	39.4	.
Total (N)	16	25	33	1

B7b: College change in next five years	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Change for the better (%)	75.0	68.0	40.6	.
Change for the worse (%)	6.3	4.0	21.9	100.0
Not really change (%)	18.8	28.0	37.5	.
Total (N)	16	25	32	1

B7c: NC State change in next five years	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Change for the better (%)	56.3	48.0	30.3	100.0
Change for the worse (%)	6.3	.	9.1	.
Not really change (%)	37.5	52.0	60.6	.
Total (N)	16	25	33	1

Back to Top

Section C: Leadership

C1a: Dept admin communication with faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.5	3.4	3.5	4.0
4: Excellent (%)	56.3	54.2	54.8	100.0
3: Good (%)	37.5	33.3	38.7	.
2: Fair (%)	6.3	8.3	6.5	.
1: Poor (%)	.	4.2	.	.
Total (N)	16	24	31	1

C1b: Dept admin seek faculty input for dept vision	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.5	3.0	3.2	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	68.8	41.7	44.8	.
3: Good (%)	12.5	33.3	37.9	100.0
2: Fair (%)	18.8	12.5	13.8	.
1: Poor (%)	.	12.5	3.4	.
Total (N)	16	24	29	1

C1c: Dept admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.1	3.1	4.0
4: Excellent (%)	50.0	45.8	36.7	100.0
3: Good (%)	25.0	25.0	43.3	.
2: Fair (%)	25.0	20.8	13.3	.
1: Poor (%)	.	8.3	6.7	.
Total (N)	16	24	30	1

C1d: Dept admin delegate dept responsibility to faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.2	3.1	2.0
4: Excellent (%)	46.7	41.7	28.6	.
3: Good (%)	33.3	41.7	60.7	.
2: Fair (%)	20.0	12.5	3.6	100.0
1: Poor (%)	.	4.2	7.1	.
Total (N)	15	24	28	1

C1e: Dept admin grant faculty autonomy	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.4	3.5	3.4	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	50.0	58.3	58.1	.
3: Good (%)	43.8	33.3	32.3	100.0
2: Fair (%)	6.3	8.3	3.2	.
1: Poor (%)	.	.	6.5	.
Total (N)	16	24	31	1

C1f: Dept admin set clear and explicit priorities	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	3.0	2.9	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	31.3	33.3	24.1	.
3: Good (%)	56.3	41.7	41.4	100.0
2: Fair (%)	12.5	16.7	34.5	.
1: Poor (%)	.	8.3	.	.
Total (N)	16	24	29	1

C1g: Dept admin appreciate your contrib to mission	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.4	3.2	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	50.0	54.2	48.4	.
3: Good (%)	37.5	29.2	29.0	100.0
2: Fair (%)	6.3	16.7	19.4	.
1: Poor (%)	6.3	.	3.2	.
Total (N)	16	24	31	1

C1h: Dept admin conflict resolution	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0	2.8	2.0
4: Excellent (%)	20.0	30.4	26.9	.
3: Good (%)	53.3	47.8	38.5	.
2: Fair (%)	20.0	13.0	19.2	100.0
1: Poor (%)	6.7	8.7	15.4	.
Total (N)	15	23	26	1

C1i: Dept admin provide necessary resources	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	3.1	2.8	2.0
4: Excellent (%)	18.8	37.5	29.0	.
3: Good (%)	50.0	37.5	38.7	.
2: Fair (%)	18.8	20.8	19.4	100.0
1: Poor (%)	12.5	4.2	12.9	.
Total (N)	16	24	31	1

C1j: Dept admin allocate resources fairly	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	3.2	3.1	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	26.7	54.2	36.7	.
3: Good (%)	40.0	20.8	46.7	100.0
2: Fair (%)	33.3	16.7	6.7	.
1: Poor (%)	.	8.3	10.0	.
Total (N)	15	24	30	1

C1k: Dept admin serve as advocate for dept to college	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.5	3.4	3.3	4.0
4: Excellent (%)	53.8	54.2	51.6	100.0
3: Good (%)	38.5	33.3	32.3	.
2: Fair (%)	7.7	8.3	12.9	.
1: Poor (%)	.	4.2	3.2	.
Total (N)	13	24	31	1

C1l: Dept admin support academic freedom	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.6	3.5	3.5	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	64.3	60.9	56.7	.
3: Good (%)	35.7	26.1	36.7	100.0
2: Fair (%)	.	13.0	6.7	.
Total (N)	14	23	30	1

C1m: Dept admin make rational decisions	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	3.5	3.3	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	37.5	58.3	46.7	.
3: Good (%)	50.0	37.5	40.0	100.0
2: Fair (%)	6.3	4.2	13.3	.
1: Poor (%)	6.3	.	.	.
Total (N)	16	24	30	1

C1n: Dept admin make equitable decisions	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.3	3.4	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	43.8	54.2	48.1	.
3: Good (%)	43.8	25.0	40.7	100.0
2: Fair (%)	12.5	16.7	11.1	.
1: Poor (%)	.	4.2	.	.
Total (N)	16	24	27	1

C1o: Dept admin promote diversity within dept	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	2.9	3.0	2.0
4: Excellent (%)	46.2	21.7	37.5	.
3: Good (%)	30.8	47.8	37.5	.
2: Fair (%)	23.1	26.1	16.7	100.0
1: Poor (%)	.	4.3	8.3	.
Total (N)	13	23	24	1

C2a: College admin communication with faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.5	2.5	2.0
4: Excellent (%)	25.0	12.5	6.1	.
3: Good (%)	50.0	37.5	48.5	.
2: Fair (%)	12.5	37.5	33.3	100.0
1: Poor (%)	12.5	12.5	12.1	.
Total (N)	16	24	33	1

C2b: College admin seek faculty input for vision	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.3	2.2	2.0
4: Excellent (%)	18.8	13.0	3.2	.
3: Good (%)	43.8	26.1	38.7	.
2: Fair (%)	31.3	39.1	29.0	100.0
1: Poor (%)	6.3	21.7	29.0	.
Total (N)	16	23	31	1

C2c: College admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.2	2.0	2.0
4: Excellent (%)	13.3	4.5	.	.
3: Good (%)	33.3	36.4	41.4	.
2: Fair (%)	53.3	36.4	20.7	100.0
1: Poor (%)	.	22.7	37.9	.
Total (N)	15	22	29	1

C2d: College admin grant departmental autonomy	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.2	2.7	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	25.0	34.8	11.1	.
3: Good (%)	50.0	47.8	55.6	100.0
2: Fair (%)	25.0	17.4	22.2	.
1: Poor (%)	.	.	11.1	.
Total (N)	12	23	27	1

C2e: College admin set clear and explicit priorities	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8	2.6	1.0
4: Excellent (%)	35.7	12.5	6.5	.
3: Good (%)	35.7	62.5	51.6	.
2: Fair (%)	14.3	16.7	38.7	.
1: Poor (%)	14.3	8.3	3.2	100.0
Total (N)	14	24	31	1

C2f: College admin appreciate your contrib to mission	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.7	2.5	2.0
4: Excellent (%)	21.4	17.4	10.0	.
3: Good (%)	50.0	43.5	43.3	.
2: Fair (%)	28.6	30.4	33.3	100.0
1: Poor (%)	.	8.7	13.3	.
Total (N)	14	23	30	1

C2g: College admin conflict resolution	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25
Mean Rating	2.5	2.4	2.2
4: Excellent (%)	8.3	5.6	.
3: Good (%)	41.7	55.6	35.7
2: Fair (%)	41.7	11.1	46.4
1: Poor (%)	8.3	27.8	17.9
Total (N)	12	18	28

C2h: College admin provide necessary resources	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.8	2.4	2.0
4: Excellent (%)	12.5	16.0	3.1	.
3: Good (%)	56.3	52.0	53.1	.
2: Fair (%)	12.5	32.0	21.9	100.0
1: Poor (%)	18.8	.	21.9	.
Total (N)	16	25	32	1

C2i: College admin allocate resources fairly	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.7	2.5	2.0
4: Excellent (%)	13.3	17.4	6.7	.
3: Good (%)	46.7	52.2	53.3	.
2: Fair (%)	33.3	13.0	23.3	100.0
1: Poor (%)	6.7	17.4	16.7	.
Total (N)	15	23	30	1

C2j: College admin serve as advocate for college to univ	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	3.4	2.9	2.0
4: Excellent (%)	53.8	52.4	24.0	.
3: Good (%)	23.1	38.1	52.0	.
2: Fair (%)	15.4	9.5	16.0	100.0
1: Poor (%)	7.7	.	8.0	.
Total (N)	13	21	25	1

C2k: College admin support academic freedom	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	3.5	2.9	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	42.9	50.0	22.2	.
3: Good (%)	42.9	45.8	55.6	100.0
2: Fair (%)	7.1	4.2	11.1	.
1: Poor (%)	7.1	.	11.1	.
Total (N)	14	24	27	1

C2l: College admin make rational decisions	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0	2.7	2.0
4: Excellent (%)	21.4	28.0	11.5	.
3: Good (%)	50.0	44.0	53.8	.
2: Fair (%)	21.4	24.0	26.9	100.0
1: Poor (%)	7.1	4.0	7.7	.
Total (N)	14	25	26	1

C2m: College admin make equitable decisions	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.6	2.6	2.0
4: Excellent (%)	14.3	21.7	11.1	.
3: Good (%)	50.0	34.8	51.9	.
2: Fair (%)	35.7	21.7	25.9	100.0
1: Poor (%)	.	21.7	11.1	.
Total (N)	14	23	27	1

C2n: College admin promote diversity within college	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0	2.8	2.0
4: Excellent (%)	28.6	26.1	18.5	.
3: Good (%)	42.9	47.8	55.6	.
2: Fair (%)	28.6	21.7	14.8	100.0
1: Poor (%)	.	4.3	11.1	.
Total (N)	14	23	27	1

C3a: Univ admin communication with faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.2	2.4	2.0	2.0
4: Excellent (%)	.	9.1	.	.
3: Good (%)	35.7	40.9	37.9	.
2: Fair (%)	50.0	31.8	27.6	100.0
1: Poor (%)	14.3	18.2	34.5	.
Total (N)	14	22	29	1

C3b: Univ admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.2	2.4	2.1	2.0
4: Excellent (%)	.	12.5	.	.
3: Good (%)	36.4	31.3	35.3	.
2: Fair (%)	45.5	37.5	35.3	100.0
1: Poor (%)	18.2	18.8	29.4	.
Total (N)	11	16	17	1

C3c: Univ admin set clear and explicit priorities	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.5	2.5	2.0
4: Excellent (%)	8.3	15.8	4.2	.
3: Good (%)	50.0	36.8	45.8	.
2: Fair (%)	33.3	26.3	45.8	100.0
1: Poor (%)	8.3	21.1	4.2	.
Total (N)	12	19	24	1

C3d: Univ admin serves as advocate for univ to constituents	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.8	3.1	2.0
4: Excellent (%)	16.7	17.6	25.0	.
3: Good (%)	50.0	58.8	60.0	.
2: Fair (%)	16.7	11.8	15.0	100.0
1: Poor (%)	16.7	11.8	.	.
Total (N)	12	17	20	1

C3e: Univ admin support academic freedom	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	3.3	2.9	2.0
4: Excellent (%)	8.3	38.1	12.5	.
3: Good (%)	66.7	57.1	70.8	.
2: Fair (%)	16.7	.	8.3	100.0
1: Poor (%)	8.3	4.8	8.3	.
Total (N)	12	21	24	1

C3f: Univ admin make rational decisions	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.7	2.7	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	20.0	13.3	.	.
3: Good (%)	40.0	53.3	70.0	100.0
2: Fair (%)	20.0	20.0	30.0	.
1: Poor (%)	20.0	13.3	.	.
Total (N)	10	15	20	1

C3g: Univ admin make equitable decisions	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.6	2.6	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	20.0	12.5	.	.
3: Good (%)	30.0	50.0	60.0	100.0
2: Fair (%)	30.0	18.8	35.0	.
1: Poor (%)	20.0	18.8	5.0	.
Total (N)	10	16	20	1

C3h: Univ admin promote diversity within university	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	2.9	2.7	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	30.8	29.4	5.0	.
3: Good (%)	46.2	41.2	70.0	100.0
2: Fair (%)	23.1	17.6	15.0	.
1: Poor (%)	.	11.8	10.0	.
Total (N)	13	17	20	1

Back to Top

Section D: Faculty-Administration Relationships

D1a: I am encouraged to give input on curricular issues	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	3.4	3.3	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	31.3	44.0	40.6	.
3: Agree (%)	43.8	48.0	50.0	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	12.5	8.0	9.4	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	12.5	.	.	.
Total (N)	16	25	32	1

D1b: I am encouraged to give input on prog assessment	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	3.3	3.1	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	13.3	40.0	28.1	.
3: Agree (%)	40.0	52.0	53.1	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	33.3	8.0	18.8	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	13.3	.	.	.
Total (N)	15	25	32	1

D1c: I am encouraged to give input on dept hiring	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.2	3.2	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	31.3	48.0	34.4	.
3: Agree (%)	50.0	32.0	59.4	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	12.5	16.0	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.3	4.0	6.3	.
Total (N)	16	25	32	1

D1d: I am encouraged to give input on college admin appointments	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.8	2.7	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	12.5	24.0	12.5	.
3: Agree (%)	50.0	48.0	46.9	.
2: Disagree (%)	18.8	16.0	34.4	100.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	18.8	12.0	6.3	.
Total (N)	16	25	32	1

D1e: I am encouraged to give input on university admin appointments	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.1	2.5	2.4	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	16.0	6.3	.
3: Agree (%)	33.3	28.0	37.5	.
2: Disagree (%)	46.7	48.0	46.9	100.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	20.0	8.0	9.4	.
Total (N)	15	25	32	1

D2: Familiarity with academic program assessment in dept	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.4	3.1	3.0	4.0
4: Very familiar (%)	6.3	32.0	33.3	100.0
3: Somewhat familiar (%)	43.8	44.0	30.3	.
2: Not very familiar (%)	31.3	24.0	36.4	.
1: Not at all familiar (%)	18.8	.	.	.
Total (N)	16	25	33	1

D3a: Understanding of resource allocation to university	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	1.9	2.4	2.3	2.0
4: Very well (%)	.	8.0	9.1	.
3: Fairly well (%)	25.0	20.0	30.3	.
2: Not very well (%)	43.8	72.0	39.4	100.0
1: Not at all (%)	31.3	.	21.2	.
Total (N)	16	25	33	1

D3b: Understanding of resource allocation to college	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.2	2.5	2.3	2.0
4: Very well (%)	.	8.0	3.0	.
3: Fairly well (%)	37.5	36.0	36.4	.
2: Not very well (%)	43.8	56.0	45.5	100.0
1: Not at all (%)	18.8	.	15.2	.
Total (N)	16	25	33	1

D3c: Understanding of resource allocation to department	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.9	2.8	3.0
4: Very well (%)	18.8	28.0	24.2	.
3: Fairly well (%)	31.3	36.0	33.3	100.0
2: Not very well (%)	43.8	36.0	36.4	.
1: Not at all (%)	6.3	.	6.1	.
Total (N)	16	25	33	1

D3d: Understanding of resource allocation within department	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.4	3.3	4.0
4: Very well (%)	37.5	56.0	50.0	100.0
3: Fairly well (%)	31.3	32.0	31.3	.
2: Not very well (%)	25.0	12.0	18.8	.
1: Not at all (%)	6.3	.	.	.
Total (N)	16	25	32	1

D4: Faculty have sufficient input on dept resource allocation	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	3.2	3.0	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	12.5	36.0	18.8	.
3: Agree (%)	56.3	44.0	65.6	.
2: Disagree (%)	31.3	20.0	12.5	100.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	3.1	.
Total (N)	16	25	32	1

D5: Dept faculty searches/appointments are collegial and inclusive	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.3	3.3	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	37.5	52.0	46.9	.
3: Agree (%)	56.3	32.0	46.9	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	6.3	12.0	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	4.0	6.3	.
Total (N)	16	25	32	1

D6a: Relations between faculty in dept and dept admin	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.6	3.5	3.4	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	62.5	62.5	50.0	.
3: Good (%)	31.3	29.2	46.9	100.0
2: Fair (%)	6.3	8.3	.	.
1: Poor (%)	.	.	3.1	.
Total (N)	16	24	32	1

D6b: Relations between faculty in dept and college admin	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0	2.8	1.0
4: Excellent (%)	20.0	29.2	15.2	.
3: Good (%)	66.7	50.0	54.5	.
2: Fair (%)	.	16.7	24.2	.
1: Poor (%)	13.3	4.2	6.1	100.0
Total (N)	15	24	33	1

D6c: Relations between faculty in dept and univ admin	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.1	2.4	2.3	2.0
4: Excellent (%)	11.1	5.9	.	.
3: Good (%)	22.2	35.3	50.0	.
2: Fair (%)	33.3	47.1	25.0	100.0
1: Poor (%)	33.3	11.8	25.0	.
Total (N)	9	17	20	1

D6d: Relations between all faculty and univ admin	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.4	2.2	2.4	2.0
3: Good (%)	60.0	33.3	52.9	.
2: Fair (%)	20.0	50.0	29.4	100.0
1: Poor (%)	20.0	16.7	17.6	.
Total (N)	5	18	17	1

D7a: Faculty Senate effective commun between faculty and univ admin	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.4	2.2	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	12.5	13.3	.	.
3: Agree (%)	50.0	26.7	36.0	.
2: Disagree (%)	12.5	46.7	44.0	100.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	25.0	13.3	20.0	.
Total (N)	8	15	25	1

D7b: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty in general	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.2	2.1	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	12.5	6.7	.	.
3: Agree (%)	50.0	33.3	36.4	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	12.5	33.3	40.9	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	25.0	26.7	22.7	.
Total (N)	8	15	22	1

D7c: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty like me	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	1.8	2.1	2.0
3: Agree (%)	50.0	7.1	33.3	.
2: Disagree (%)	25.0	64.3	47.6	100.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	25.0	28.6	19.0	.
Total (N)	8	14	21	1

D8: Effectiveness of university grievance procedures	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	2.4	2.7	3.0
4: Very effective (%)	25.0	16.7	23.5	.
3: Somewhat effective (%)	25.0	33.3	35.3	100.0
2: Not very effective (%)	.	25.0	29.4	.
1: Not at all effective (%)	50.0	25.0	11.8	.
Total (N)	4	12	17	1

D9: Importance of "ombuds" for informal conflict resolution	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.6	3.6	3.5	3.0
4: Very important (%)	56.3	62.5	57.6	.
3: Somewhat important (%)	43.8	33.3	33.3	100.0
2: Not very important (%)	.	4.2	9.1	.
Total (N)	16	24	33	1

Back to Top

Section E: Diversity/Multiculturalism

E1: Importance of institutional emphasis on diversity/multiculturalism	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.5	3.6	3.3	4.0
4: Very important (%)	53.3	60.0	43.8	100.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	40.0	40.0	43.8	.
2: Not very important (%)	6.7	.	12.5	.
Total (N)	15	25	32	1

E2: Importance of diversity to enhanced learning in own classroom	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9	2.8	3.0
4: Very important (%)	26.7	29.2	19.4	.
3: Somewhat important (%)	40.0	37.5	41.9	100.0
2: Not very important (%)	26.7	29.2	38.7	.
1: Not at all important (%)	6.7	4.2	.	.
Total (N)	15	24	31	1

E3: NCSU prepares students to live and work in diverse society	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	2.7	2.6	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	16.7	18.8	4.2	.
3: Agree (%)	75.0	50.0	62.5	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	8.3	12.5	25.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	18.8	8.3	.
Total (N)	12	16	24	1

E4a: My dept recruits historically underrepresented students	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.1	2.8	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	41.7	20.0	18.5	.
3: Agree (%)	41.7	65.0	51.9	.
2: Disagree (%)	16.7	15.0	22.2	100.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	7.4	.
Total (N)	12	20	27	1

E4b: My dept retains historically underrepresented students	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.2	2.9	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.0	27.8	11.1	.
3: Agree (%)	58.3	61.1	74.1	.
2: Disagree (%)	8.3	11.1	11.1	100.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.3	.	3.7	.
Total (N)	12	18	27	1

E4c: My dept supports historically underrepresented students	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	2.9	2.9	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	27.3	26.3	12.0	.
3: Agree (%)	63.6	52.6	72.0	.
2: Disagree (%)	.	10.5	12.0	100.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.1	10.5	4.0	.
Total (N)	11	19	25	1

E4d: My dept recruits historically underrepresented faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8	2.8	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	20.0	22.2	16.7	.
3: Agree (%)	40.0	44.4	54.2	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	40.0	22.2	20.8	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	11.1	8.3	.
Total (N)	10	18	24	1

E4e: My dept retains historically underrepresented faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8	2.8	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	20.0	26.3	16.7	.
3: Agree (%)	40.0	47.4	54.2	.
2: Disagree (%)	40.0	10.5	16.7	100.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	15.8	12.5	.
Total (N)	10	19	24	1

E4f: My dept supports historically underrepresented faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.8	2.7	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	22.2	21.1	13.0	.
3: Agree (%)	55.6	47.4	60.9	.
2: Disagree (%)	22.2	21.1	13.0	100.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	10.5	13.0	.
Total (N)	9	19	23	1

E5a: Dept environ accepting/respectful of age	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25
Mean Rating	3.7	3.5	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	69.2	54.2	51.6
3: Agree (%)	30.8	41.7	45.2
2: Disagree (%)	.	4.2	3.2
Total (N)	13	24	31

E5b: Dept environ accepting/respectful of disability status	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25
Mean Rating	3.6	3.6	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	58.3	63.2	43.5
3: Agree (%)	41.7	36.8	47.8
2: Disagree (%)	.	.	4.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	4.3
Total (N)	12	19	23

E5c: Dept environ accepting/respectful of gender	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.6	3.6	3.5	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	64.3	60.0	51.6	.
3: Agree (%)	28.6	36.0	45.2	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	7.1	4.0	3.2	.
Total (N)	14	25	31	1

E5d: Dept environ accepting/respectful of military status	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.8	3.7	3.4	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	80.0	68.4	41.7	.
3: Agree (%)	20.0	31.6	54.2	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	.	4.2	.
Total (N)	10	19	24	1

E5e: Dept environ accepting/respectful of nationality/ethnic origin	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25
Mean Rating	3.7	3.6	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	69.2	64.0	50.0
3: Agree (%)	30.8	36.0	43.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	6.7
Total (N)	13	25	30

E5f: Dept environ accepting/respectful of race and color	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25
Mean Rating	3.6	3.6	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	64.3	60.0	42.9
3: Agree (%)	28.6	36.0	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	7.1	4.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	7.1
Total (N)	14	25	28

E5g: Dept environ accepting/respectful of religion	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25
Mean Rating	3.6	3.6	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	61.5	61.9	44.4
3: Agree (%)	38.5	33.3	51.9
2: Disagree (%)	.	4.8	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	3.7
Total (N)	13	21	27

E5h: Dept environ accepting/respectful of sexual orientation	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25
Mean Rating	3.6	3.6	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	63.6	65.2	43.5
3: Agree (%)	36.4	30.4	52.2
2: Disagree (%)	.	4.3	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	4.3
Total (N)	11	23	23

E6a: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of age	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.7	3.6	3.6	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	71.4	65.2	67.7	.
3: Agree (%)	28.6	30.4	29.0	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	4.3	3.2	.
Total (N)	14	23	31	1

E6b: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of disability status	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.7	3.7	3.6	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	69.2	65.0	65.4	.
3: Agree (%)	30.8	35.0	30.8	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	.	3.8	.
Total (N)	13	20	26	1

E6c: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of gender	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.6	3.6	3.7	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	66.7	65.2	67.7	.
3: Agree (%)	26.7	30.4	32.3	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	6.7	4.3	.	.
Total (N)	15	23	31	1

E6d: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of military status	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.8	3.7	3.6	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	75.0	66.7	63.0	.
3: Agree (%)	25.0	33.3	33.3	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	.	3.7	.
Total (N)	12	21	27	1

E6e: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of national/ethnic origin	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.6	3.7	3.6	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	66.7	68.2	66.7	.
3: Agree (%)	26.7	31.8	30.0	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	6.7	.	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	3.3	.
Total (N)	15	22	30	1

E6f: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of race and color	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.6	3.6	3.5	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	66.7	63.6	60.0	.
3: Agree (%)	26.7	31.8	36.7	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	6.7	4.5	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	3.3	.
Total (N)	15	22	30	1

E6g: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of religion	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.7	3.6	3.6	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	71.4	61.9	65.5	.
3: Agree (%)	28.6	33.3	31.0	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	4.8	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	3.4	.
Total (N)	14	21	29	1

E6h: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of sexual orientation	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.7	3.6	3.5	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	69.2	65.2	60.0	.
3: Agree (%)	30.8	30.4	36.0	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	4.3	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	4.0	.
Total (N)	13	23	25	1

E7: Faculty diversity/multiculturalism enhancement of intellectual diversity in dept	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8	2.5	3.0
4: A great deal (%)	26.7	18.2	3.2	.
3: Some (%)	46.7	50.0	48.4	100.0
2: A little (%)	20.0	22.7	38.7	.
1: Not at all (%)	6.7	9.1	9.7	.
Total (N)	15	22	31	1

E8: Inclusion of diversity-related topics, scholarship, etc in your courses	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.1	1.6	1.4	2.0
4: A great deal (%)	21.4	4.3	.	.
3: Some (%)	21.4	17.4	12.5	.
2: A little (%)	7.1	13.0	18.8	100.0
1: Not at all (%)	50.0	65.2	68.8	.
Total (N)	14	23	32	1

E9a: Interest in research, extension, art endeavors outside U.S.	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	3.0	3.0	1.0
4: A great deal (%)	33.3	44.0	37.5	.
3: Some (%)	26.7	28.0	34.4	.
2: A little (%)	20.0	8.0	18.8	.
1: None (%)	20.0	20.0	9.4	100.0
Total (N)	15	25	32	1

E9b: Interest in teaching study abroad	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.2	2.5	2.0
4: A great deal (%)	13.3	24.0	21.9	.
3: Some (%)	46.7	20.0	34.4	.
2: A little (%)	20.0	12.0	18.8	100.0
1: None (%)	20.0	44.0	25.0	.
Total (N)	15	25	32	1

E9c: Interest in participating in spring break service learning	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.0	1.7	1.7	3.0
4: A great deal (%)	13.3	4.2	3.2	.
3: Some (%)	20.0	20.8	16.1	100.0
2: A little (%)	20.0	12.5	25.8	.
1: None (%)	46.7	62.5	54.8	.
Total (N)	15	24	31	1

E9d: Interest in participating in international service projects	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.6	2.4	3.0
4: A great deal (%)	20.0	32.0	10.0	.
3: Some (%)	33.3	28.0	40.0	100.0
2: A little (%)	33.3	12.0	30.0	.
1: None (%)	13.3	28.0	20.0	.
Total (N)	15	25	30	1

E9e: Interest in teaching in international studies major	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.0	1.6	1.5	3.0
4: A great deal (%)	6.7	8.0	3.2	.
3: Some (%)	20.0	16.0	12.9	100.0
2: A little (%)	40.0	8.0	19.4	.
1: None (%)	33.3	68.0	64.5	.
Total (N)	15	25	31	1

E9f: Interest in advising international students	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.4	2.4	2.2	1.0
4: A great deal (%)	26.7	24.0	12.9	.
3: Some (%)	20.0	28.0	25.8	.
2: A little (%)	20.0	12.0	32.3	.
1: None (%)	33.3	36.0	29.0	100.0
Total (N)	15	25	31	1

Back to Top

Section F: Working Relationships

F1: There is unity/cohesion among faculty in my department	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.2	3.0	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	40.0	44.0	25.0	.
3: Agree (%)	40.0	32.0	53.1	.
2: Disagree (%)	13.3	20.0	18.8	100.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.7	4.0	3.1	.
Total (N)	15	25	32	1

F2a: Good communication between my students and me	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.5	3.3	3.2	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	60.0	28.0	32.3	.
3: Agree (%)	33.3	72.0	61.3	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	6.7	.	3.2	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	3.2	.
Total (N)	15	25	31	1

F2b: Good communication between dept and our students	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.0	3.0	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	26.7	28.6	10.3	.
3: Agree (%)	66.7	47.6	79.3	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	19.0	6.9	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.7	4.8	3.4	.
Total (N)	15	21	29	1

F2c: Good communication between faculty in my dept	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	3.2	3.1	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	33.3	44.0	18.8	.
3: Agree (%)	53.3	36.0	71.9	.
2: Disagree (%)	13.3	20.0	6.3	100.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	3.1	.
Total (N)	15	25	32	1

F2d: Good communication between my dept and other depts	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	3.0	2.7	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	7.1	24.0	3.3	.
3: Agree (%)	57.1	52.0	73.3	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	35.7	24.0	16.7	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	6.7	.
Total (N)	14	25	30	1

F2e: Good communication between my college and other colleges	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25
Mean Rating	2.5	2.6	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	12.5	5.6	.
3: Agree (%)	37.5	55.6	60.9
2: Disagree (%)	37.5	27.8	13.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	12.5	11.1	26.1
Total (N)	8	18	23

F3: Dept environ promotes respectful dialogue between diverse perspectives	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	3.5	3.2	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	33.3	68.0	37.5	.
3: Agree (%)	60.0	20.0	50.0	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	8.0	6.3	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.7	4.0	6.3	.
Total (N)	15	25	32	1

F4a: Frequency given/recvd teaching advice in dept past few years	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	3.2	2.9	4.0
Frequently (%)	33.3	36.0	21.9	100.0
Sometimes (%)	46.7	48.0	50.0	.
Seldom (%)	.	12.0	21.9	.
Never (%)	20.0	4.0	6.3	.
Total (N)	15	25	32	1

F4b: Frequency given/recvd research/artistic feedback in dept past few yrs	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	3.6	3.2	3.0
Frequently (%)	40.0	60.0	50.0	.
Sometimes (%)	40.0	36.0	31.3	100.0
Seldom (%)	20.0	4.0	9.4	.
Never (%)	.	.	9.4	.
Total (N)	15	25	32	1

F4c: Frequency given/recvd help with dept/college bureaucracy past few yrs	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.2	3.0	2.0
Frequently (%)	33.3	48.0	28.1	.
Sometimes (%)	46.7	28.0	46.9	.
Seldom (%)	20.0	24.0	18.8	100.0
Never (%)	.	.	6.3	.
Total (N)	15	25	32	1

F4d: Frequency given/recvd help undrsnd reappointment, promotion, tenure past few yrs	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.4	3.0	2.0
Frequently (%)	33.3	48.0	21.9	.
Sometimes (%)	46.7	40.0	65.6	.
Seldom (%)	20.0	12.0	6.3	100.0
Never (%)	.	.	6.3	.
Total (N)	15	25	32	1

F4e: Frequency given/recvd help with work/personal balance issues past few yrs	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.5	2.4	2.0
Frequently (%)	13.3	16.0	15.6	.
Sometimes (%)	33.3	36.0	25.0	.
Seldom (%)	40.0	32.0	43.8	100.0
Never (%)	13.3	16.0	15.6	.
Total (N)	15	25	32	1

F5a: Frequency of collab with faculty in your dept	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.7	3.7	3.6	4.0
Frequently (%)	73.3	72.0	65.6	100.0
Sometimes (%)	26.7	24.0	28.1	.
Seldom (%)	.	4.0	6.3	.
Total (N)	15	25	32	1

F5b: Frequency of collab with faculty in other NCSU depts	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	3.2	3.2	3.0
Frequently (%)	33.3	48.0	37.5	.
Sometimes (%)	33.3	36.0	43.8	100.0
Seldom (%)	20.0	4.0	15.6	.
Never (%)	13.3	12.0	3.1	.
Total (N)	15	25	32	1

F5c: Frequency of collab with faculty from other universities	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	3.1	3.2	3.0
Frequently (%)	20.0	28.0	46.9	.
Sometimes (%)	46.7	52.0	31.3	100.0
Seldom (%)	13.3	20.0	15.6	.
Never (%)	20.0	.	6.3	.
Total (N)	15	25	32	1

F5d: Frequency of collab with non-faculty external to NCSU	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.4	2.8	2.6	1.0
Frequently (%)	20.0	16.0	28.1	.
Sometimes (%)	33.3	60.0	28.1	.
Seldom (%)	13.3	16.0	21.9	.
Never (%)	33.3	8.0	21.9	100.0
Total (N)	15	25	32	1

Back to Top

Section G: Faculty Support & Professional Development

G1a: Satisfaction with level of courses	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.7	3.3	3.5	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	71.4	42.9	46.9	.
3: Satisfied (%)	28.6	47.6	53.1	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	9.5	.	.
Total (N)	14	21	32	1

G1b: Satisfaction with number of courses	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.6	3.3	3.3	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	57.1	30.4	38.7	.
3: Satisfied (%)	42.9	65.2	51.6	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	4.3	9.7	.
Total (N)	14	23	31	1

G1c: Satisfaction with choice in courses	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.3	3.4	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	42.9	43.5	37.5	.
3: Satisfied (%)	42.9	47.8	62.5	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	14.3	4.3	.	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	4.3	.	.
Total (N)	14	23	32	1

G1d: Satisfaction with course content discretion	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.4	3.6	3.7	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	50.0	65.2	71.9	.
3: Satisfied (%)	42.9	30.4	28.1	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	7.1	4.3	.	.
Total (N)	14	23	32	1

G1e: Satisfaction with number of students	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.5	3.2	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	35.7	52.2	28.1	.
3: Satisfied (%)	57.1	47.8	62.5	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	7.1	.	9.4	.
Total (N)	14	23	32	1

G1f: Satisfaction with quality of undergraduates	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25
Mean Rating	3.2	2.8	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	40.0	25.0	18.2
3: Satisfied (%)	40.0	25.0	63.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	20.0	50.0	18.2
Total (N)	5	4	11

G1g: Satisfaction with quality of graduate students	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0	3.1	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	28.6	13.0	16.1	.
3: Satisfied (%)	42.9	69.6	77.4	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	28.6	17.4	6.5	.
Total (N)	14	23	31	1

G1h: Satisfaction with access to grad TAs	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25
Mean Rating	2.3	2.3	1.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	14.3	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	28.6	42.9	30.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	28.6	42.9	30.8
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	28.6	14.3	38.5
Total (N)	7	7	13

G1i: Satisfaction with access to grad RAs	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25
Mean Rating	2.2	2.2	2.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	11.1	9.1	.
3: Satisfied (%)	33.3	18.2	35.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	22.2	54.5	29.4
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	33.3	18.2	35.3
Total (N)	9	11	17

G2a: NCSU supports innovative teaching	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	3.3	3.3	1.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	46.2	34.8	33.3	.
3: Agree (%)	38.5	56.5	60.0	.
2: Disagree (%)	.	8.7	6.7	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	15.4	.	.	100.0
Total (N)	13	23	30	1

G2b: NCSU supports innovative research and scholarly activity	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.4	3.4	3.1	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	42.9	52.2	31.3	.
3: Agree (%)	50.0	39.1	53.1	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	7.1	8.7	12.5	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	3.1	.
Total (N)	14	23	32	1

G2c: NCSU supports innovative creative artistry and literature	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.3	3.3	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	50.0	.	33.3	.
3: Agree (%)	.	66.7	66.7	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	50.0	.	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	33.3	.	.
Total (N)	2	3	6	1

G2d: NCSU supports innovative extension/engagement/econ dev activity	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	3.4	3.2	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.0	47.1	28.6	.
3: Agree (%)	66.7	47.1	61.9	.
2: Disagree (%)	8.3	.	9.5	100.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	5.9	.	.
Total (N)	12	17	21	1

G3a: NCSU rewards innovative teaching	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	3.0	2.8	1.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	23.1	26.1	15.6	.
3: Agree (%)	46.2	43.5	46.9	.
2: Disagree (%)	15.4	30.4	34.4	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	15.4	.	3.1	100.0
Total (N)	13	23	32	1

G3b: NCSU rewards innovative research and scholarly activity	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.6	3.2	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	35.7	62.5	37.5	.
3: Agree (%)	35.7	37.5	43.8	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	28.6	.	15.6	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	3.1	.
Total (N)	14	24	32	1

G3c: NCSU rewards innovative creative artistry and literature	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.5	3.0	2.8	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	50.0	.	.	.
3: Agree (%)	50.0	100.0	75.0	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	.	25.0	.
Total (N)	2	2	4	1

G3d: NCSU rewards innovative extension/engagement/econ dev activity	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.1	2.8	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	20.0	23.5	6.3	.
3: Agree (%)	70.0	64.7	68.8	.
2: Disagree (%)	10.0	11.8	18.8	100.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	6.3	.
Total (N)	10	17	16	1

G4a: Satisfaction: Availability of classroom technology	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.1	2.9	2.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	21.4	23.8	18.8	.
3: Satisfied (%)	57.1	61.9	59.4	.
2: Dissatisfied (%)	21.4	14.3	15.6	100.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	.	6.3	.
Total (N)	14	21	32	1

G4b: Satisfaction: Teaching reduction for scholarly/prof growth	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.4	2.7	2.5	1.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	12.5	17.6	8.3	.
3: Satisfied (%)	25.0	47.1	50.0	.
2: Dissatisfied (%)	50.0	23.5	25.0	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	12.5	11.8	16.7	100.0
Total (N)	8	17	24	1

G4c: Satisfaction: Teaching workshop/seminar opportunities	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	3.1	3.0	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	7.7	19.0	6.9	.
3: Satisfied (%)	53.8	71.4	86.2	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	30.8	9.5	6.9	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	7.7	.	.	.
Total (N)	13	21	29	1

G4d: Satisfaction: Avail of funds to attend teaching conference/wrkshp	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.4	2.7	2.3	2.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	7.7	22.2	5.3	.
3: Satisfied (%)	46.2	38.9	36.8	.
2: Dissatisfied (%)	23.1	22.2	42.1	100.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	23.1	16.7	15.8	.
Total (N)	13	18	19	1

G4e: Satisfaction: Learning technology training/support	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	3.0	2.7	2.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	8.3	19.0	4.0	.
3: Satisfied (%)	58.3	61.9	64.0	.
2: Dissatisfied (%)	16.7	19.0	32.0	100.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	16.7	.	.	.
Total (N)	12	21	25	1

G4f: Satisfaction: Campus bookstore meeting course needs	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25
Mean Rating	2.6	3.4	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	28.6	37.5	.
3: Satisfied (%)	28.6	62.5	87.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	14.3	.	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	28.6	.	12.5
Total (N)	7	8	8

G4g: Satisfaction: Availability of funds to present work	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25
Mean Rating	2.4	2.7	2.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	18.2	3.2
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	45.5	41.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	35.7	27.3	38.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	14.3	9.1	16.1
Total (N)	14	22	31

G4h: Satisfaction: Opportunities for scholarly/professional leave	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.9	2.6	1.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	29.4	7.1	.
3: Satisfied (%)	70.0	41.2	60.7	.
2: Dissatisfied (%)	20.0	17.6	21.4	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	10.0	11.8	10.7	100.0
Total (N)	10	17	28	1

G4i: Satisfaction: Financial support for scholarly/professional leave	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.2	2.9	2.4	1.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	33.3	7.4	.
3: Satisfied (%)	40.0	26.7	40.7	.
2: Dissatisfied (%)	40.0	33.3	33.3	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	20.0	6.7	18.5	100.0
Total (N)	10	15	27	1

G4j: Satisfaction: Leadership development opportunities	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25
Mean Rating	2.6	2.9	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	11.1	12.5	6.3
3: Satisfied (%)	44.4	62.5	56.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	33.3	25.0	25.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	11.1	.	12.5
Total (N)	9	16	16

G4k: Satisfaction: Support for dept assessment Activities	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	12.5	23.5	4.8
3: Satisfied (%)	62.5	52.9	57.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	12.5	17.6	23.8
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	12.5	5.9	14.3
Total (N)	8	17	21

G4l: Satisfaction: Availability of/access to materials via NCSU Libraries	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	3.2	3.0	4.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	30.8	37.5	19.4	100.0
3: Satisfied (%)	53.8	50.0	64.5	.
2: Dissatisfied (%)	15.4	8.3	12.9	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	4.2	3.2	.
Total (N)	13	24	31	1

G4m: Satisfaction: Support with dealing with student concerns	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	3.2	2.8	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	22.2	26.3	7.4	.
3: Satisfied (%)	77.8	63.2	74.1	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	10.5	11.1	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	.	7.4	.
Total (N)	9	19	27	1

G4n: Satisfaction: Support for technology transfer	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.6	2.6	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	11.1	17.6	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	55.6	47.1	69.6	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	22.2	11.8	17.4	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	11.1	23.5	13.0	.
Total (N)	9	17	23	1

G5: Assignment of formal mentor	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Yes (%)	73.3	33.3	9.4	.
No (%)	26.7	66.7	90.6	100.0
Total (N)	15	24	32	1

G6: Mentor helpfulness	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25
Mean Rating	3.0	3.5	2.7
4: Very helpful (%)	45.5	62.5	33.3
3: Somewhat helpful (%)	18.2	25.0	33.3
2: Not very helpful (%)	27.3	12.5	.
1: Not at all helpful (%)	9.1	.	33.3
Total (N)	11	8	3

G7a: Satisfaction: Pre-award support from college for grant/contract	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8	2.8	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	20.0	11.1	17.9	.
3: Satisfied (%)	60.0	66.7	53.6	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	10.0	16.7	21.4	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	10.0	5.6	7.1	.
Total (N)	10	18	28	1

G7b: Satisfaction: Post-award support from college for grant/contract	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.8	2.7	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	25.0	5.6	11.1	.
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	66.7	59.3	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	25.0	27.8	22.2	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	.	7.4	.
Total (N)	8	18	27	1

G7c: Satisfaction: Pre-award University support for grant/contract	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.4	2.5	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	11.1	.	4.2	.
3: Satisfied (%)	66.7	50.0	54.2	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	11.1	37.5	29.2	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	11.1	12.5	12.5	.
Total (N)	9	16	24	1

G7d: Satisfaction: Post-award University support for grant/contract	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.3	2.3	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	12.5	.	4.2	.
3: Satisfied (%)	75.0	43.8	45.8	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	43.8	25.0	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	12.5	12.5	25.0	.
Total (N)	8	16	24	1

G7e: Satisfaction: Allocation of indirect grant costs to investigator	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.4	2.5	2.2	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	5.0	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	62.5	40.0	46.2	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	12.5	50.0	26.9	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	25.0	5.0	26.9	.
Total (N)	8	20	26	1

G7f: Satisfaction: Allocation of indirect grant costs to department	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.5	1.9	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	10.0	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	71.4	30.0	21.7	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	28.6	55.0	47.8	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	5.0	30.4	.
Total (N)	7	20	23	1

G7g: Satisfaction: PI control over indirect cost allocation	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.1	2.4	1.9	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	5.0	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	44.4	35.0	30.8	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	22.2	55.0	30.8	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	33.3	5.0	38.5	.
Total (N)	9	20	26	1

Back to Top

Section H: Performance Review, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure

H1: Faculty performance review standards are clearly stated	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.5	3.4	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	42.9	66.7	51.6	.
3: Agree (%)	50.0	16.7	38.7	.
2: Disagree (%)	.	12.5	6.5	100.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.1	4.2	3.2	.
Total (N)	14	24	31	1

H2: Faculty performance review procedures are clearly stated	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.5	3.4	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	42.9	62.5	51.6	.
3: Agree (%)	42.9	29.2	41.9	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	8.3	3.2	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	14.3	.	3.2	.
Total (N)	14	24	31	1

H3: SME is consistent with departmental vision	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.5	3.2	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	42.9	54.2	25.0	.
3: Agree (%)	50.0	41.7	71.4	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	4.2	3.6	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.1	.	.	.
Total (N)	14	24	28	1

H4: SME is consistent with departmental promotion standards	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.6	3.3	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	35.7	68.2	35.7	.
3: Agree (%)	50.0	27.3	60.7	.
2: Disagree (%)	7.1	4.5	3.6	100.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.1	.	.	.
Total (N)	14	22	28	1

H5a: Performance Review feedback appropriately based on SME	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.4	3.5	3.1	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	57.1	62.5	18.5	.
3: Agree (%)	28.6	29.2	77.8	.
2: Disagree (%)	14.3	8.3	.	100.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	3.7	.
Total (N)	14	24	27	1

H5b: Performance Review feedback helpful for professional Development	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.3	2.9	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	23.1	45.8	17.2	.
3: Agree (%)	61.5	41.7	62.1	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	15.4	4.2	17.2	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	8.3	3.4	.
Total (N)	13	24	29	1

H5c: Performance Review feedback corresponds with my perceptions of own performance	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.5	3.1	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	28.6	62.5	30.0	.
3: Agree (%)	64.3	25.0	56.7	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	8.3	6.7	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.1	4.2	6.7	.
Total (N)	14	24	30	1

H5d: Performance Review feedback helps understand relation to other faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.8	2.8	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	14.3	29.2	23.3	.
3: Agree (%)	42.9	29.2	40.0	.
2: Disagree (%)	35.7	29.2	30.0	100.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.1	12.5	6.7	.
Total (N)	14	24	30	1

H5e: Feedback given appropriate weight in merit raises	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.2	2.8	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	28.6	43.5	16.7	.
3: Agree (%)	57.1	39.1	60.0	.
2: Disagree (%)	.	8.7	13.3	100.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	14.3	8.7	10.0	.
Total (N)	14	23	30	1

H6: Understanding of current Academic Tenure Policy	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	3.1	3.2	2.0
4: Very well (%)	13.3	41.7	30.0	.
3: Fairly well (%)	40.0	33.3	63.3	.
2: Not very well (%)	46.7	20.8	6.7	100.0
1: Not at all (%)	.	4.2	.	.
Total (N)	15	24	30	1

H7_1: Participated in RPT process as candidate	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	66.7	16.7	19.4	100.0
Yes (%)	33.3	83.3	80.6	.
Total (N)	15	24	31	1

H7_2: Participated in RPT process as voter	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	93.3	37.5	3.2	.
Yes (%)	6.7	62.5	96.8	100.0
Total (N)	15	24	31	1

H7_3: Participated in RPT process as review committee member	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	93.3	58.3	32.3	100.0
Yes (%)	6.7	41.7	67.7	.
Total (N)	15	24	31	1

H7_4: Have never participated in RPT process	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	33.3	95.8	100.0	100.0
Yes (%)	66.7	4.2	.	.
Total (N)	15	24	31	1

H8: Understand dept RPT standards	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	3.5	3.5	2.0
4: Very well (%)	26.7	62.5	54.8	.
3: Fairly well (%)	40.0	20.8	38.7	.
2: Not very well (%)	33.3	16.7	6.5	100.0
Total (N)	15	24	31	1

H9: Understand dept RPT procedures	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	3.5	3.6	3.0
4: Very well (%)	13.3	62.5	64.5	.
3: Fairly well (%)	46.7	29.2	29.0	100.0
2: Not very well (%)	33.3	8.3	6.5	.
1: Not at all (%)	6.7	.	.	.
Total (N)	15	24	31	1

H10: Departmental RPT standards applied consistently/fairly	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	3.4	3.4	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	20.0	63.6	53.3	.
3: Agree (%)	60.0	22.7	33.3	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	10.0	4.5	10.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	10.0	9.1	3.3	.
Total (N)	10	22	30	1

H11: Departmental RPT procedures applied consistently/fairly	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.4	3.4	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	30.0	57.1	51.7	.
3: Agree (%)	50.0	33.3	44.8	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	10.0	4.8	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	10.0	4.8	3.4	.
Total (N)	10	21	29	1

H12a: Sufficient resources for teaching/mentoring students	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9	2.8	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	17.4	10.3	.
3: Agree (%)	91.7	60.9	62.1	.
2: Disagree (%)	.	13.0	20.7	100.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.3	8.7	6.9	.
Total (N)	12	23	29	1

H12b: Sufficient resources for discovery of knowledge	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.9	2.5	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	15.8	6.7	.
3: Agree (%)	61.5	68.4	53.3	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	30.8	10.5	26.7	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.7	5.3	13.3	.
Total (N)	13	19	30	1

H12c: Sufficient resources for creative artistry and literature	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	2.0	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.0	.	.
3: Agree (%)	75.0	50.0	.
2: Disagree (%)	.	.	100.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	50.0	.
Total (N)	4	2	1

H12d: Sufficient resources for tech/managerial innovation	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	2.9	2.4	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	20.0	5.9	.
3: Agree (%)	50.0	60.0	52.9	.
2: Disagree (%)	33.3	10.0	17.6	100.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	16.7	10.0	23.5	.
Total (N)	6	10	17	1

H12e: Sufficient resources for extension/engagement	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.8	2.6	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	6.7	4.8	.
3: Agree (%)	62.5	80.0	57.1	.
2: Disagree (%)	37.5	.	33.3	100.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	13.3	4.8	.
Total (N)	8	15	21	1

H12f: Sufficient resources for professional service	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.8	2.7	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	18.2	7.4	.
3: Agree (%)	58.3	54.5	63.0	.
2: Disagree (%)	41.7	18.2	25.9	100.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	9.1	3.7	.
Total (N)	12	22	27	1

H13a: Department rewards teaching/mentoring of students	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	3.0	2.9	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	18.2	20.8	22.6	.
3: Agree (%)	36.4	58.3	51.6	.
2: Disagree (%)	36.4	16.7	22.6	100.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.1	4.2	3.2	.
Total (N)	11	24	31	1

H13b: Department rewards discovery of knowledge	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	3.8	3.5	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	33.3	77.3	51.6	.
3: Agree (%)	50.0	22.7	45.2	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	16.7	.	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	3.2	.
Total (N)	12	22	31	1

H13c: Department rewards creative artistry and literature	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	3.5	3.3	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	50.0	50.0	33.3	.
3: Agree (%)	.	50.0	66.7	.
2: Disagree (%)	.	.	.	100.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	50.0	.	.	.
Total (N)	2	2	3	1

H13d: Department rewards tech/managerial innovation	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	3.2	2.8	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	12.5	33.3	14.3	.
3: Agree (%)	62.5	53.3	57.1	.
2: Disagree (%)	12.5	13.3	21.4	100.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	12.5	.	7.1	.
Total (N)	8	15	14	1

H13e: Department rewards extension/engagement	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.1	3.0	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.0	42.9	16.7	.
3: Agree (%)	50.0	38.1	66.7	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	25.0	9.5	16.7	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	9.5	.	.
Total (N)	8	21	24	1

H13f: Department rewards professional service	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.1	2.7	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	20.0	29.2	3.6	.
3: Agree (%)	60.0	54.2	67.9	.
2: Disagree (%)	20.0	12.5	21.4	100.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	4.2	7.1	.
Total (N)	10	24	28	1

Back to Top

Section I: Post-Tenure Review

I1_1: No experience with PTR	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Has experience (%)	6.7	66.7	87.1	100.0
No experience (%)	93.3	33.3	12.9	.
Total (N)	15	24	31	1

I1_2: Have had PTR Comprehensive Review	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	100.0	37.5	16.1	.
Yes (%)	.	62.5	83.9	100.0
Total (N)	15	24	31	1

I1_3: Have served on PTR committee	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	93.3	79.2	35.5	100.0
Yes (%)	6.7	20.8	64.5	.
Total (N)	15	24	31	1

I1_4: Have been dept/college administrator in PTR process	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	100.0	91.7	90.3	100.0
Yes (%)	.	8.3	9.7	.
Total (N)	15	24	31	1

I1_5: Had other PTR experience	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	100.0	95.8	90.3	100.0
Yes (%)	.	4.2	9.7	.
Total (N)	15	24	31	1

I2a: Easy to find PTR information on NCSU website	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	3.2	3.2	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	14.3	26.3	30.4	.
3: Agree (%)	28.6	63.2	56.5	.
2: Disagree (%)	57.1	10.5	13.0	100.0
Total (N)	7	19	23	1

I2b: PTR process known/understood in department	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	3.1	3.0	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	28.6	37.0	.
3: Agree (%)	37.5	52.4	33.3	.
2: Disagree (%)	50.0	19.0	25.9	100.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	12.5	.	3.7	.
Total (N)	8	21	27	1

I2c: Departmental PTR procedures are clear	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	3.2	3.2	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	35.0	32.1	.
3: Agree (%)	66.7	50.0	57.1	.
2: Disagree (%)	16.7	15.0	7.1	100.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	16.7	.	3.6	.
Total (N)	6	20	28	1

I2d: Departmental PTR standards are clear	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	3.1	3.1	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	14.3	30.0	33.3	.
3: Agree (%)	57.1	55.0	44.4	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	14.3	10.0	18.5	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	14.3	5.0	3.7	.
Total (N)	7	20	27	1

I2e: Departmental PTR procedures are followed equitably	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	3.2	3.3	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	16.7	38.9	45.8	.
3: Agree (%)	50.0	50.0	37.5	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	16.7	5.6	12.5	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	16.7	5.6	4.2	.
Total (N)	6	18	24	1

I2f: Departmental PTR standards are applied fairly	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	3.2	3.2	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	16.7	38.9	42.3	.
3: Agree (%)	50.0	44.4	42.3	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	16.7	11.1	11.5	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	16.7	5.6	3.8	.
Total (N)	6	18	26	1

I2g: Dept PTR committee members are well prepared and trained	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25
Mean Rating	2.6	3.1	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	29.4	25.0
3: Agree (%)	80.0	52.9	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	17.6	20.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	20.0	.	4.2
Total (N)	5	17	24

I3: Overall satisfaction with PTR process	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9	2.8	2.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	33.3	30.0	11.1	.
3: Satisfied (%)	33.3	45.0	63.0	.
2: Dissatisfied (%)	33.3	5.0	18.5	100.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	20.0	7.4	.
Total (N)	3	20	27	1

Back to Top

Section J: Pay and Compensation

J1a: My salary is competitive within my department	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25
Mean Rating	2.5	3.1	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.0	31.8	18.5
3: Agree (%)	40.0	50.0	55.6
2: Disagree (%)	40.0	13.6	7.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	10.0	4.5	18.5
Total (N)	10	22	27

J1b: My salary is competitive within my college	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25
Mean Rating	2.4	3.0	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.0	35.0	20.0
3: Agree (%)	30.0	35.0	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	50.0	20.0	16.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	10.0	10.0	24.0
Total (N)	10	20	25

J1c: My salary is competitive within NC State	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25
Mean Rating	2.6	3.0	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.0	43.8	42.1
3: Agree (%)	60.0	25.0	36.8
2: Disagree (%)	10.0	18.8	15.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	20.0	12.5	5.3
Total (N)	10	16	19

J1d: My salary is competitive within UNC system	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25
Mean Rating	2.0	2.5	2.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	12.5	23.1	7.1
3: Agree (%)	12.5	30.8	35.7
2: Disagree (%)	37.5	23.1	21.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	37.5	23.1	35.7
Total (N)	8	13	14

J1e: My salary is competitive within discipline at comparable institutions	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25
Mean Rating	1.9	2.4	1.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	19.0	.
3: Agree (%)	26.7	23.8	13.0
2: Disagree (%)	33.3	33.3	56.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	40.0	23.8	30.4
Total (N)	15	21	23

J2: Understand how faculty salaries determined	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	1.9	2.9	2.8	3.0
4: Very well (%)	.	33.3	25.8	.
3: Fairly well (%)	33.3	37.5	45.2	100.0
2: Not very well (%)	20.0	16.7	16.1	.
1: Not at all (%)	46.7	12.5	12.9	.
Total (N)	15	24	31	1

J3: My department links salary increase to meritorious performance	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	3.3	3.0	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	7.7	39.1	27.6	.
3: Agree (%)	53.8	56.5	48.3	.
2: Disagree (%)	30.8	.	20.7	100.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.7	4.3	3.4	.
Total (N)	13	23	29	1

J4: I have access to benefits information	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	3.6	3.4	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	26.7	62.5	40.0	.
3: Agree (%)	40.0	33.3	56.7	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	26.7	4.2	3.3	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.7	.	.	.
Total (N)	15	24	30	1

J5: Healthcare benefits are competitive with other institutions	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.0	2.3	1.8	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	14.3	.	.
3: Agree (%)	42.9	38.1	17.9	.
2: Disagree (%)	14.3	14.3	42.9	100.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	42.9	33.3	39.3	.
Total (N)	14	21	28	1

J6: Retirement programs are competitive with other institutions	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.9	2.2	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	19.0	3.8	.
3: Agree (%)	78.6	57.1	38.5	.
2: Disagree (%)	7.1	14.3	34.6	100.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	14.3	9.5	23.1	.
Total (N)	14	21	26	1

J7: Voluntary benefits programs are competitive with other institutions	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.4	3.1	2.5	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	23.5	5.3	.
3: Agree (%)	66.7	64.7	57.9	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	11.1	11.8	21.1	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	22.2	.	15.8	.
Total (N)	9	17	19	1

J8: I am satisfied with my compensation at NC State	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.4	2.7	2.4	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	20.8	.	.
3: Agree (%)	46.7	37.5	45.2	.
2: Disagree (%)	46.7	29.2	45.2	100.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.7	12.5	9.7	.
Total (N)	15	24	31	1

J9: Departmental environment enables work/personal life balance	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	3.0	2.8	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	13.3	25.0	6.5	.
3: Agree (%)	40.0	50.0	71.0	.
2: Disagree (%)	46.7	25.0	16.1	100.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	6.5	.
Total (N)	15	24	31	1

J10: NCSU environment enables work/personal life balance	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9	2.8	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	14.3	13.0	9.7	.
3: Agree (%)	50.0	65.2	64.5	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	35.7	17.4	19.4	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	4.3	6.5	.
Total (N)	14	23	31	1

J11a: Importance of flexible work hours	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.6	3.8	3.6	4.0
4: Very important (%)	66.7	83.3	61.3	100.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	26.7	16.7	38.7	.
2: Not very important (%)	6.7	.	.	.
Total (N)	15	24	31	1

J11b: Importance of maternity/paternity leave	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.8	4.0	3.6	3.0
4: Very important (%)	80.0	95.8	67.7	.
3: Somewhat important (%)	20.0	4.2	29.0	100.0
2: Not very important (%)	.	.	3.2	.
Total (N)	15	24	31	1

J11c: Importance of family leave time	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.7	3.9	3.6	3.0
4: Very important (%)	66.7	91.7	64.5	.
3: Somewhat important (%)	33.3	8.3	35.5	100.0
Total (N)	15	24	31	1

J11d: Importance of altering tenure clock for family concerns	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.9	4.0	3.6	3.0
4: Very important (%)	86.7	95.8	67.7	.
3: Somewhat important (%)	13.3	4.2	29.0	100.0
2: Not very important (%)	.	.	3.2	.
Total (N)	15	24	31	1

J11e: Importance of childcare facility on or near campus	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.4	3.5	3.3	3.0
4: Very important (%)	53.3	54.2	45.2	.
3: Somewhat important (%)	33.3	45.8	35.5	100.0
2: Not very important (%)	13.3	.	19.4	.
Total (N)	15	24	31	1

J11f: Importance of tuition remission for dependents	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.6	3.7	3.5	4.0
4: Very important (%)	60.0	70.8	71.0	100.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	40.0	25.0	12.9	.
2: Not very important (%)	.	4.2	16.1	.
Total (N)	15	24	31	1

Back to Top

Section K: Campus Infrastructure/Physical Environment

K1: I have sufficient clerical/admin support in my dept	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0	2.5	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	13.3	25.0	16.1	.
3: Agree (%)	60.0	58.3	41.9	.
2: Disagree (%)	26.7	12.5	22.6	100.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	4.2	19.4	.
Total (N)	15	24	31	1

K2: I have sufficient tech assistance	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.7	2.5	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	21.7	12.9	.
3: Agree (%)	53.3	39.1	35.5	.
2: Disagree (%)	40.0	30.4	41.9	100.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.7	8.7	9.7	.
Total (N)	15	23	31	1

K3: There is sufficient support staff in my college	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	3.0	2.5	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	20.8	16.1	.
3: Agree (%)	66.7	54.2	35.5	.
2: Disagree (%)	33.3	25.0	35.5	100.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	12.9	.
Total (N)	15	24	31	1

K4a: Satisfaction with office space	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	3.6	3.2	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	26.7	58.3	38.7	.
3: Satisfied (%)	40.0	41.7	41.9	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	20.0	.	19.4	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	13.3	.	.	.
Total (N)	15	24	31	1

K4b: Satisfaction with lab space	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	3.3	2.8	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	10.0	38.9	18.5	.
3: Satisfied (%)	60.0	50.0	44.4	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	20.0	11.1	33.3	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	10.0	.	3.7	.
Total (N)	10	18	27	1

K4c: Satisfaction with classrooms in which you teach	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.3	2.7	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	14.3	37.5	3.2	.
3: Satisfied (%)	78.6	54.2	67.7	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	7.1	8.3	25.8	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	.	3.2	.
Total (N)	14	24	31	1

K4d: Satisfaction with labs in which you teach	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.2	2.8	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	10.0	27.8	5.0	.
3: Satisfied (%)	80.0	66.7	70.0	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	10.0	5.6	25.0	.
Total (N)	10	18	20	1

K4e: Satisfaction with maintenance of building in which you work	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.8	2.5	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	12.5	9.7	.
3: Satisfied (%)	60.0	62.5	45.2	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	33.3	16.7	25.8	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.7	8.3	19.4	.
Total (N)	15	24	31	1

K4f: Satisfaction with infrastructure of bldgs in which you work	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.7	2.4	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	13.3	16.7	9.7	.
3: Satisfied (%)	26.7	45.8	45.2	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	53.3	29.2	22.6	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.7	8.3	22.6	.
Total (N)	15	24	31	1

K4g: Satisfaction with availability of up-to-date equipment	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	3.1	2.7	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.7	29.2	6.5	.
3: Satisfied (%)	60.0	58.3	61.3	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	33.3	8.3	25.8	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	4.2	6.5	.
Total (N)	15	24	31	1

K4h: Satisfaction with availability of office supplies	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	3.0	2.7	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.7	26.1	12.9	.
3: Satisfied (%)	33.3	47.8	58.1	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	46.7	21.7	12.9	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	13.3	4.3	16.1	.
Total (N)	15	23	31	1

K4i: Satisfaction with availability of informal meeting space	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.8	2.4	2.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	21.4	20.8	6.5	.
3: Satisfied (%)	14.3	45.8	41.9	.
2: Dissatisfied (%)	64.3	20.8	38.7	100.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	12.5	12.9	.
Total (N)	14	24	31	1

K4j: Satisfaction with dining options on campus	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.6	2.1	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	13.3	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	55.6	40.0	43.8	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	44.4	40.0	25.0	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	6.7	31.3	.
Total (N)	9	15	16	1

K4k: Satisfaction with availability of parking	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.6	2.5	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	8.7	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	80.0	60.9	61.3	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	6.7	13.0	25.8	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	13.3	17.4	12.9	.
Total (N)	15	23	31	1

K4l: Satisfaction with cost of parking	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.1	2.3	2.0	2.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	8.3	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	40.0	29.2	22.6	.
2: Dissatisfied (%)	26.7	41.7	54.8	100.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	33.3	20.8	22.6	.
Total (N)	15	24	31	1

K4m: Satisfaction with Wolfline	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.5	2.8	3.0	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	50.0	12.5	14.3	.
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	62.5	71.4	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	12.5	14.3	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	12.5	.	.
Total (N)	4	8	7	1

K4n: Satisfaction with commute between Centennial and main	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25
Mean Rating	3.0	3.1	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	25.0	10.0	20.0
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	90.0	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	25.0	.	20.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	.	10.0
Total (N)	4	10	10

K4o: Satisfaction with campus safety	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.0	2.8	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	10.0	4.5	3.7	.
3: Satisfied (%)	90.0	90.9	77.8	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	.	14.8	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	4.5	3.7	.
Total (N)	10	22	27	1

K4p: Satisfaction with campus aesthetics	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8	2.5	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	4.3	3.3	.
3: Satisfied (%)	84.6	78.3	60.0	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	15.4	8.7	23.3	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	8.7	13.3	.
Total (N)	13	23	30	1

K4q: Satisfaction with upkeep of campus grounds	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9	2.9	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	8.7	6.7	.
3: Satisfied (%)	92.3	78.3	80.0	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	7.7	8.7	10.0	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	4.3	3.3	.
Total (N)	13	23	30	1

K4r: Satisfaction with amount of green space	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8	2.5	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	9.1	6.9	.
3: Satisfied (%)	76.9	63.6	48.3	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	23.1	22.7	34.5	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	4.5	10.3	.
Total (N)	13	22	29	1

K5a: Satisfaction with energy conservation	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.3	2.3	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	6.3	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	66.7	37.5	36.4	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	22.2	37.5	54.5	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	11.1	18.8	9.1	.
Total (N)	9	16	22	1

K5b: Satisfaction with water conservation	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.4	2.3	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	6.7	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	66.7	40.0	43.5	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	22.2	40.0	43.5	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	11.1	13.3	13.0	.
Total (N)	9	15	23	1

K5c: Satisfaction with recycling efforts	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.7	3.0	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	16.7	4.5	16.7	.
3: Satisfied (%)	66.7	68.2	66.7	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	16.7	22.7	16.7	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	4.5	.	.
Total (N)	12	22	30	1

K5d: Satisfaction with alternative transportation	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.3	2.4	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	11.1	.	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	55.6	37.5	59.1	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	22.2	56.3	22.7	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	11.1	6.3	18.2	.
Total (N)	9	16	22	1

K5e: Satisfaction with green building practices	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.4	2.1	3.0
3: Satisfied (%)	80.0	57.1	42.9	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	20.0	28.6	28.6	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	14.3	28.6	.
Total (N)	5	14	14	1

K5f: Satisfaction with use of recycled-content resources	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25
Mean Rating	3.0	2.6	2.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	7.7	.
3: Satisfied (%)	100.0	53.8	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	30.8	42.9
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	7.7	7.1
Total (N)	4	13	14

K6: Interest in hotel/conference center on Centennial Campus	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8	2.5	3.0
4: A lot (%)	46.7	37.5	19.4	.
3: Some (%)	6.7	25.0	41.9	100.0
2: A little (%)	26.7	16.7	12.9	.
1: None at all (%)	20.0	20.8	25.8	.
Total (N)	15	24	31	1

K7: Likelihood of using conference center on Centennial Campus	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	2.9	2.8	2.0
4: Very likely (%)	46.7	37.5	25.8	.
3: Somewhat likely (%)	33.3	25.0	38.7	.
2: Not very likely (%)	6.7	25.0	29.0	100.0
1: Not at all likely (%)	13.3	12.5	6.5	.
Total (N)	15	24	31	1

Back to Top

Section L: Recreation/Wellness

L1: Satisfaction with recreation activities on campus	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	3.0	2.8	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	16.7	6.9	.
3: Satisfied (%)	80.0	62.5	69.0	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	20.0	20.8	17.2	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	.	6.9	.
Total (N)	15	24	29	1

L2: Satisfaction with cultural activities on campus	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.9	2.8	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	8.3	3.4	.
3: Satisfied (%)	73.3	75.0	82.8	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	26.7	16.7	6.9	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	.	6.9	.
Total (N)	15	24	29	1

L3a: Satisfaction with Carmichael Gymnasium	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9	2.7	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	26.3	6.7	.
3: Satisfied (%)	85.7	42.1	60.0	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	14.3	26.3	26.7	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	5.3	6.7	.
Total (N)	7	19	15	1

L3b: Satisfaction with recreation space around campus	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	3.1	2.5	2.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	25.0	7.7	.
3: Satisfied (%)	66.7	62.5	53.8	.
2: Dissatisfied (%)	33.3	12.5	23.1	100.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	.	15.4	.
Total (N)	6	16	13	1

L3c: Satisfaction with organized Campus Recreation Activities	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	3.1	2.3	2.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	12.5	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	87.5	57.1	.
2: Dissatisfied (%)	50.0	.	14.3	100.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	.	28.6	.
Total (N)	2	8	7	1

L3d: Satisfaction with ARTS NC State programs	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25
Mean Rating	2.5	3.0	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	16.7	5.6
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	66.7	72.2
2: Dissatisfied (%)	50.0	16.7	22.2
Total (N)	2	12	18

L3e: Satisfaction with Wolfpack athletic events	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.7	3.2	3.1	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	66.7	20.0	13.3	.
3: Satisfied (%)	33.3	80.0	86.7	100.0
Total (N)	3	15	15	1

L4a: How often use Carmichael Gymnasium	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	1.7	3.3	2.4	6.0
Once a week or more (%)	.	20.8	12.9	100.0
A few times a month (%)	.	8.3	6.5	.
A few times a semester (%)	20.0	20.8	12.9	.
Once a semester (%)	.	12.5	6.5	.
Once a year (%)	6.7	4.2	.	.
Never (%)	73.3	33.3	61.3	.
Total (N)	15	24	31	1

L4b: How often use recreational space around campus	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	1.9	3.1	1.8	2.0
Once a week or more (%)	.	20.8	3.4	.
A few times a month (%)	.	4.2	.	.
A few times a semester (%)	20.0	20.8	13.8	.
Once a semester (%)	6.7	12.5	.	.
Once a year (%)	13.3	4.2	17.2	100.0
Never (%)	60.0	37.5	65.5	.
Total (N)	15	24	29	1

L4c: How often participate in organized Campus Recreation Activities	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	1.1	1.7	1.3	5.0
Once a week or more (%)	.	8.3	.	.
A few times a month (%)	.	.	3.3	100.0
A few times a semester (%)	.	4.2	3.3	.
Once a semester (%)	.	4.2	.	.
Once a year (%)	13.3	4.2	10.0	.
Never (%)	86.7	79.2	83.3	.
Total (N)	15	24	30	1

L4d: How often attend ARTS NC State programs	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	1.6	2.1	2.4	2.0
A few times a month (%)	.	.	6.5	.
A few times a semester (%)	13.3	21.7	19.4	.
Once a semester (%)	6.7	8.7	25.8	.
Once a year (%)	6.7	30.4	6.5	100.0
Never (%)	73.3	39.1	41.9	.
Total (N)	15	23	31	1

L4e: How often attend Wolfpack athletic events	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	1.6	2.8	2.2	5.0
Once a week or more (%)	.	4.2	.	.
A few times a month (%)	.	12.5	6.5	100.0
A few times a semester (%)	13.3	12.5	16.1	.
Once a semester (%)	.	25.0	16.1	.
Once a year (%)	20.0	16.7	9.7	.
Never (%)	66.7	29.2	51.6	.
Total (N)	15	24	31	1

L5: Interest in designated faculty-only dining facility	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.0	1.5	1.6	2.0
4: A great deal (%)	13.3	8.3	6.5	.
3: Some (%)	20.0	8.3	16.1	.
2: A little (%)	20.0	8.3	6.5	100.0
1: None at all (%)	46.7	75.0	71.0	.
Total (N)	15	24	31	1

L6: Likelihood of using gym on Centennial campus	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	1.9	1.8	1.5	2.0
4: Very likely (%)	13.3	12.5	6.5	.
3: Somewhat likely (%)	6.7	12.5	9.7	.
2: Not very likely (%)	33.3	16.7	12.9	100.0
1: Not at all likely (%)	46.7	58.3	71.0	.
Total (N)	15	24	31	1

Back to Top

Section M: Work Activities

M1: Total hours per week spent performing job-related work (collapsed)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean # Hrs Work	56.7	56.0	55.8	60.0
more than 60 hrs (%)	20.0	8.3	16.1	.
51 to 60 hrs (%)	40.0	62.5	48.4	100.0
41 to 50 hrs (%)	33.3	20.8	32.3	.
40 hrs or less (%)	6.7	8.3	3.2	.
Total (N)	15	24	31	1

M2A: Proportion of total hours spent on teaching/mentoring	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean % of Time on Activity	35.6	30.3	39.8	40.0
more than 50% of time (%)	20.0	8.3	16.1	.
26% to 50% of time (%)	26.7	45.8	67.7	100.0
11% to 25% of time (%)	46.7	33.3	9.7	.
6% to 10% of time (%)	6.7	12.5	6.5	.
Total (N)	15	24	31	1

M2a_1r: Includes teaching (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	26.7	4.2	9.7	.
Yes (%)	73.3	95.8	90.3	100.0
Total (N)	15	24	31	1

M2a_2r: Includes professional development to improve teaching (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	60.0	54.2	51.6	.
Yes (%)	40.0	45.8	48.4	100.0
Total (N)	15	24	31	1

M2a_3r: Includes research projects with students (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	26.7	37.5	38.7	100.0
Yes (%)	73.3	62.5	61.3	.
Total (N)	15	24	31	1

M2a_4r: Includes supervising internships/field experiences (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	40.0	58.3	54.8	100.0
Yes (%)	60.0	41.7	45.2	.
Total (N)	15	24	31	1

M2a_5r: Includes student thesis/dissertation committee work (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	66.7	50.0	25.8	100.0
Yes (%)	33.3	50.0	74.2	.
Total (N)	15	24	31	1

M2B: Proportion of total hours spent advising students	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean % of Time on Activity	4.9	4.6	4.4	0.0
11% to 25% of time (%)	6.7	.	.	.
6% to 10% of time (%)	20.0	20.8	16.1	.
1% to 5% of time (%)	40.0	62.5	67.7	.
0% of time (%)	33.3	16.7	16.1	100.0
Total (N)	15	24	31	1

M2b_1r: Includes formal advising (among those reporting time spent on advising)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25
No (%)	30.0	25.0	30.8
Yes (%)	70.0	75.0	69.2
Total (N)	10	20	26

M2b_2r: Includes informal advising (among those reporting time spent on advising)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25
No (%)	30.0	40.0	11.5
Yes (%)	70.0	60.0	88.5
Total (N)	10	20	26

M2C: Proportion of total hours spent on research/scholarly Activities	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean % of Time on Activity	24.5	36.7	29.6	5.0
more than 50% of time (%)	13.3	20.8	9.7	.
26% to 50% of time (%)	20.0	54.2	48.4	.
11% to 25% of time (%)	33.3	16.7	19.4	.
6% to 10% of time (%)	.	8.3	16.1	.
1% to 5% of time (%)	26.7	.	6.5	100.0
0% of time (%)	6.7	.	.	.
Total (N)	15	24	31	1

M2D: Proportion of total hours spent on creative artistry/literature	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean % of Time on Activity	0.0	0.0	0.2	5.0
1% to 5% of time (%)	.	.	6.5	100.0
0% of time (%)	100.0	100.0	93.5	.
Total (N)	15	24	31	1

M2E: Proportion of total hours spent on extension/engagement/econ dev	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean % of Time on Activity	5.5	8.1	5.8	5.0
26% to 50% of time (%)	6.7	8.3	3.2	.
11% to 25% of time (%)	.	20.8	16.1	.
6% to 10% of time (%)	20.0	.	12.9	.
1% to 5% of time (%)	33.3	25.0	16.1	100.0
0% of time (%)	40.0	45.8	51.6	.
Total (N)	15	24	31	1

M2e_1r: Includes service learning teaching/mentoring (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	44.4	69.2	80.0	100.0
Yes (%)	55.6	30.8	20.0	.
Total (N)	9	13	15	1

M2e_2r: Includes extension education/non-credit programs (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	66.7	53.8	33.3	.
Yes (%)	33.3	46.2	66.7	100.0
Total (N)	9	13	15	1

M2e_3r: Includes economic development training/tech assistance (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	100.0	92.3	86.7	100.0
Yes (%)	.	7.7	13.3	.
Total (N)	9	13	15	1

M2e_4r: Includes partnering with private sector - job/investment creation (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	66.7	92.3	93.3	100.0
Yes (%)	33.3	7.7	6.7	.
Total (N)	9	13	15	1

M2e_5r: Public service grants/contracts (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	100.0	76.9	86.7	100.0
Yes (%)	.	23.1	13.3	.
Total (N)	9	13	15	1

M2F: Proportion of total hours spent on service work	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean % of Time on Activity	18.7	16.5	14.4	40.0
more than 50% of time (%)	13.3	4.2	3.2	.
26% to 50% of time (%)	6.7	8.3	9.7	100.0
11% to 25% of time (%)	13.3	33.3	25.8	.
6% to 10% of time (%)	13.3	37.5	25.8	.
1% to 5% of time (%)	46.7	12.5	35.5	.
0% of time (%)	6.7	4.2	.	.
Total (N)	15	24	31	1

M2f_1r: Includes advising student groups (among those reporting time spent on service work)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	57.1	73.9	71.0	100.0
Yes (%)	42.9	26.1	29.0	.
Total (N)	14	23	31	1

M2f_2r: Includes dept/college/university committees (among those reporting time spent on service work)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	42.9	26.1	16.1	100.0
Yes (%)	57.1	73.9	83.9	.
Total (N)	14	23	31	1

M2f_3r: Includes professional service (among those reporting time spent on service work)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	42.9	30.4	22.6	.
Yes (%)	57.1	69.6	77.4	100.0
Total (N)	14	23	31	1

M2f_4r: Includes academic program assessment activities (among those reporting time spent on service work)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	78.6	65.2	74.2	100.0
Yes (%)	21.4	34.8	25.8	.
Total (N)	14	23	31	1

M2f_5r: Includes other university service (among those reporting time spent on service work)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	78.6	65.2	58.1	100.0
Yes (%)	21.4	34.8	41.9	.
Total (N)	14	23	31	1

M2G: Proportion of total hours spent on tech/managerial innovation	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean % of Time on Activity	2.4	0.1	0.5	0.0
11% to 25% of time (%)	6.7	.	.	.
6% to 10% of time (%)	6.7	.	.	.
1% to 5% of time (%)	6.7	8.3	12.9	.
0% of time (%)	80.0	91.7	87.1	100.0
Total (N)	15	24	31	1

M2H: Proportion of total hours spent on dept/college admin duties	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean % of Time on Activity	4.1	4.2	5.2	5.0
26% to 50% of time (%)	6.7	4.2	6.5	.
11% to 25% of time (%)	.	8.3	3.2	.
6% to 10% of time (%)	.	8.3	6.5	.
1% to 5% of time (%)	20.0	4.2	22.6	100.0
0% of time (%)	73.3	75.0	61.3	.
Total (N)	15	24	31	1

M3_1: Worked summer at NCSU without overload pay	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	40.0	50.0	48.4	100.0
Yes (%)	60.0	50.0	51.6	.
Total (N)	15	24	31	1

M3_2: Taught at NCSU on overload basis	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	86.7	95.8	100.0	100.0
Yes (%)	13.3	4.2	.	.
Total (N)	15	24	31	1

M3_3: Taught NCSU distance education class	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	86.7	95.8	96.8	100.0
Yes (%)	13.3	4.2	3.2	.
Total (N)	15	24	31	1

M3_4: Taught for another academic institution	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	80.0	79.2	77.4	100.0
Yes (%)	20.0	20.8	22.6	.
Total (N)	15	24	31	1

M3_5: Did outside consulting/freelance for pay	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	60.0	20.8	48.4	100.0
Yes (%)	40.0	79.2	51.6	.
Total (N)	15	24	31	1

M3_6: Did outside consulting/freelance without pay	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	53.3	66.7	58.1	100.0
Yes (%)	46.7	33.3	41.9	.
Total (N)	15	24	31	1

M3_7: Had other secondary employment	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	100.0	91.7	90.3	100.0
Yes (%)	.	8.3	9.7	.
Total (N)	15	24	31	1

M4: Frequency of volunteer work past 2 years	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Never (%)	20.0	16.7	12.9	.
A few times (%)	53.3	58.3	38.7	100.0
About once per month (%)	13.3	12.5	25.8	.
Two or three times per month (%)	6.7	8.3	12.9	.
At least once per week (%)	6.7	4.2	9.7	.
Total (N)	15	24	31	1

M5: Frequency of public policy work past 5 years	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Never (%)	73.3	70.8	48.4	100.0
Once or twice (%)	6.7	12.5	16.1	.
Three to five times (%)	20.0	4.2	12.9	.
Six to ten times (%)	.	.	12.9	.
More than 10 times (%)	.	12.5	9.7	.
Total (N)	15	24	31	1

M6: Management of work-related demands of past 2 years	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
1: Managing everything just fine (%)	.	.	9.7	.
2 (%)	6.7	29.2	19.4	.
3 (%)	26.7	41.7	29.0	100.0
4 (%)	53.3	25.0	25.8	.
5: Completely overwhelmed (%)	13.3	4.2	16.1	.
Total (N)	15	24	31	1

M7: Change how you spend your work time	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
I would change how I spent time (%)	91.7	72.7	65.5	100.0
I would not change a thing (%)	8.3	27.3	34.5	.
Total (N)	12	22	29	1

Back to Top

Section N: Conclusions/Overall Satisfaction

N1: Satisfaction with your "fit" in department	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.4	3.2	2.9	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	50.0	41.7	22.6	.
3: Satisfied (%)	35.7	37.5	54.8	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	14.3	20.8	16.1	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	.	6.5	.
Total (N)	14	24	31	1

N2: I generally feel valued in my department	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.5	3.3	3.1	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	64.3	50.0	35.5