North Carolina State University
2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey:

Results for the College of Veterinary Medicine
by Rank/Tenure Status 1

To skip directly to a particular section, select the section below.

Section B: Image and Vision	Section I: Post-Tenure Review
Section C: Leadership	Section J: Pay and Compensation
Section D: Faculty-Administration Relationships	Section K: Campus Infrastructure/Physical Environment
Section E: Diversity/Multiculturalism	Section L: Recreation/Wellness
Section F: Working Relationships	Section M: Work Activities
Section G: Faculty Support & Professional Development	Section N: Conclusions/Overall Satisfaction
Section H: Performance Review, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure

To download a Microsoft Word version of this document, click here.

A2: Ever held an administrative position	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
..... No (%)	64.5	87.0	100.0	80.0
..... Yes (%)	35.5	13.0	.	20.0
Total (N)	31	23	11	10

Section B: Image and Vision

B1a: Department doing good job of recruiting faculty	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.2	3.0	2.8	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	41.9	18.2	27.3	30.0
3: Agree (%)	35.5	68.2	27.3	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	22.6	9.1	45.5	10.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	4.5	.	.
Total (N)	31	22	11	10

B1b: Department creating culture where faculty can develop to full potential	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	2.8	2.9	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	29.0	18.2	27.3	20.0
3: Agree (%)	51.6	54.5	36.4	70.0
2: Disagree (%)	19.4	18.2	36.4	10.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	9.1	.	.
Total (N)	31	22	11	10

B1c: Department retaining most effective and productive faculty	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.7	2.4	2.5	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	12.9	4.3	9.1	.
3: Agree (%)	54.8	52.2	45.5	44.4
2: Disagree (%)	25.8	26.1	36.4	55.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.5	17.4	9.1	.
Total (N)	31	23	11	9

B2a: Department national reputation for undergraduate educ	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	4.1	4.0	4.5	4.0
5: Very strong (%)	37.5	.	50.0	.
4: Strong (%)	37.5	100.0	50.0	100.0
3: Average (%)	25.0	.	.	.
Total (N)	8	2	2	1

B2b: Department national reputation for graduate education	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.5	3.7	3.3	4.2
5: Very strong (%)	16.1	28.6	20.0	33.3
4: Strong (%)	35.5	19.0	20.0	55.6
3: Average (%)	29.0	42.9	30.0	11.1
2: Weak (%)	19.4	9.5	30.0	.
Total (N)	31	21	10	9

B2c: Department national reputation for research & scholarly activity	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	4.1	3.8	3.8	4.6
5: Very strong (%)	32.3	13.0	10.0	70.0
4: Strong (%)	48.4	56.5	60.0	20.0
3: Average (%)	19.4	30.4	30.0	10.0
Total (N)	31	23	10	10

B2d: Department national reputation for creative artistry and literature	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	3.3	2.3	4.0
5: Very strong (%)	20.0	.	.	.
4: Strong (%)	20.0	25.0	.	100.0
3: Average (%)	20.0	75.0	66.7	.
2: Weak (%)	20.0	.	.	.
1: Very weak (%)	20.0	.	33.3	.
Total (N)	5	4	3	1

B2e: Department national reputation for tech & managerial innovation	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.2	3.6	3.3	3.6
5: Very strong (%)	5.9	.	16.7	.
4: Strong (%)	41.2	62.5	33.3	60.0
3: Average (%)	35.3	37.5	16.7	40.0
2: Weak (%)	5.9	.	33.3	.
1: Very weak (%)	11.8	.	.	.
Total (N)	17	8	6	5

B2f: Department national reputation for extension & engagement	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	4.0	3.6	3.3	4.0
5: Very strong (%)	29.6	16.7	11.1	42.9
4: Strong (%)	48.1	38.9	33.3	28.6
3: Average (%)	18.5	38.9	44.4	14.3
2: Weak (%)	3.7	.	.	14.3
1: Very weak (%)	.	5.6	11.1	.
Total (N)	27	18	9	7

B2g: Department national reputation for contrib to econ Development	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.4	3.1	3.3	3.4
5: Very strong (%)	4.2	7.1	16.7	.
4: Strong (%)	37.5	21.4	16.7	60.0
3: Average (%)	54.2	57.1	50.0	20.0
2: Weak (%)	.	7.1	16.7	20.0
1: Very weak (%)	4.2	7.1	.	.
Total (N)	24	14	6	5

B3a: Grade undergraduate majors' ability to meet prog demands	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	4.0	4.0	4.0	3.0
A (%)	22.2	.	.	.
B (%)	55.6	100.0	100.0	50.0
C (%)	22.2	.	.	.
D (%)	.	.	.	50.0
Total (N)	9	2	2	2

B3b: Grade graduate student ability to meet prog demands	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	4.2	4.0	3.9	3.9
A (%)	25.8	21.7	9.1	40.0
B (%)	64.5	65.2	72.7	30.0
C (%)	9.7	8.7	18.2	20.0
D (%)	.	4.3	.	.
F (%)	.	.	.	10.0
Total (N)	31	23	11	10

B3c: Grade demonstrated professional ability of faculty	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	4.6	4.6	4.4	4.7
A (%)	61.3	60.9	45.5	70.0
B (%)	38.7	39.1	45.5	30.0
C (%)	.	.	9.1	.
Total (N)	31	23	11	10

B3d: Grade professional achievement of faculty	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	4.6	4.6	4.5	4.8
A (%)	64.5	56.5	54.5	80.0
B (%)	32.3	43.5	45.5	20.0
C (%)	3.2	.	.	.
Total (N)	31	23	11	10

B3e: Grade own demonstrated professional ability	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	4.6	4.4	4.3	4.1
A (%)	64.5	47.8	36.4	30.0
B (%)	32.3	47.8	54.5	50.0
C (%)	3.2	4.3	9.1	20.0
Total (N)	31	23	11	10

B3f: Grade own professional achievement	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	4.6	4.3	4.2	4.0
A (%)	61.3	34.8	36.4	20.0
B (%)	35.5	60.9	45.5	60.0
C (%)	3.2	4.3	18.2	20.0
Total (N)	31	23	11	10

B4: Department's vision for the future	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Clear vision; actively working toward goals (%)	58.1	26.1	54.5	40.0
Vision with slow progress (%)	29.0	34.8	27.3	40.0
No clear vision (%)	9.7	30.4	18.2	.
Not familiar (%)	3.2	8.7	.	20.0
Total (N)	31	23	11	10

B5: Agreement with department vision for future	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.3	3.1	3.2	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	44.4	35.7	33.3	25.0
3: Agree (%)	44.4	50.0	55.6	75.0
2: Disagree (%)	11.1	7.1	11.1	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	7.1	.	.
Total (N)	27	14	9	8

B6: College's vision for the future	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Clear vision; actively working toward goals (%)	41.9	34.8	54.5	60.0
Vision with slow progress (%)	48.4	39.1	18.2	30.0
No clear vision (%)	3.2	13.0	18.2	10.0
Not familiar (%)	6.5	13.0	9.1	.
Total (N)	31	23	11	10

B7a: Department change in next five years	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Change for the better (%)	54.8	52.2	54.5	70.0
Change for the worse (%)	16.1	13.0	.	10.0
Not really change (%)	29.0	34.8	45.5	20.0
Total (N)	31	23	11	10

B7b: College change in next five years	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Change for the better (%)	54.8	50.0	54.5	80.0
Change for the worse (%)	16.1	13.6	9.1	10.0
Not really change (%)	29.0	36.4	36.4	10.0
Total (N)	31	22	11	10

B7c: NC State change in next five years	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Change for the better (%)	48.4	30.4	36.4	60.0
Change for the worse (%)	6.5	4.3	.	10.0
Not really change (%)	45.2	65.2	63.6	30.0
Total (N)	31	23	11	10

Section C: Leadership

C1a: Dept admin communication with faculty	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.6	3.5	3.1	3.5
4: Excellent (%)	62.1	59.1	36.4	50.0
3: Good (%)	31.0	31.8	45.5	50.0
2: Fair (%)	6.9	9.1	9.1	.
1: Poor (%)	.	.	9.1	.
Total (N)	29	22	11	10

C1b: Dept admin seek faculty input for dept vision	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.4	3.0	3.2	3.6
4: Excellent (%)	53.6	36.4	45.5	66.7
3: Good (%)	32.1	31.8	36.4	22.2
2: Fair (%)	10.7	22.7	9.1	11.1
1: Poor (%)	3.6	9.1	9.1	.
Total (N)	28	22	11	9

C1c: Dept admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.3	3.0	2.8	3.4
4: Excellent (%)	44.8	45.5	18.2	66.7
3: Good (%)	41.4	22.7	45.5	11.1
2: Fair (%)	10.3	18.2	36.4	22.2
1: Poor (%)	3.4	13.6	.	.
Total (N)	29	22	11	9

C1d: Dept admin delegate dept responsibility to faculty	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.3	3.0	2.8	3.5
4: Excellent (%)	44.8	30.0	9.1	62.5
3: Good (%)	48.3	45.0	63.6	25.0
2: Fair (%)	3.4	15.0	27.3	12.5
1: Poor (%)	3.4	10.0	.	.
Total (N)	29	20	11	8

C1e: Dept admin grant faculty autonomy	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.5	3.5	3.3	3.5
4: Excellent (%)	65.5	54.5	36.4	50.0
3: Good (%)	24.1	36.4	54.5	50.0
2: Fair (%)	3.4	9.1	9.1	.
1: Poor (%)	6.9	.	.	.
Total (N)	29	22	11	10

C1f: Dept admin set clear and explicit priorities	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.2	2.8	3.0	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	41.4	14.3	27.3	22.2
3: Good (%)	34.5	52.4	54.5	55.6
2: Fair (%)	24.1	28.6	9.1	22.2
1: Poor (%)	.	4.8	9.1	.
Total (N)	29	21	11	9

C1g: Dept admin appreciate your contrib to mission	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.4	3.2	3.3	3.1
4: Excellent (%)	58.6	40.9	54.5	40.0
3: Good (%)	27.6	40.9	27.3	30.0
2: Fair (%)	13.8	13.6	9.1	30.0
1: Poor (%)	.	4.5	9.1	.
Total (N)	29	22	11	10

C1h: Dept admin conflict resolution	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9	2.4	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	29.6	31.6	.	37.5
3: Good (%)	48.1	36.8	54.5	37.5
2: Fair (%)	14.8	21.1	27.3	12.5
1: Poor (%)	7.4	10.5	18.2	12.5
Total (N)	27	19	11	8

C1i: Dept admin provide necessary resources	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	2.9	2.6	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	41.4	27.3	18.2	10.0
3: Good (%)	37.9	40.9	45.5	40.0
2: Fair (%)	6.9	27.3	18.2	50.0
1: Poor (%)	13.8	4.5	18.2	.
Total (N)	29	22	11	10

C1j: Dept admin allocate resources fairly	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.3	2.9	2.9	3.1
4: Excellent (%)	55.2	33.3	18.2	33.3
3: Good (%)	31.0	33.3	54.5	44.4
2: Fair (%)	3.4	23.8	27.3	22.2
1: Poor (%)	10.3	9.5	.	.
Total (N)	29	21	11	9

C1k: Dept admin serve as advocate for dept to college	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.5	3.3	3.4	3.3
4: Excellent (%)	65.5	50.0	40.0	37.5
3: Good (%)	20.7	31.8	60.0	50.0
2: Fair (%)	10.3	13.6	.	12.5
1: Poor (%)	3.4	4.5	.	.
Total (N)	29	22	10	8

C1l: Dept admin support academic freedom	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.6	3.5	3.3	3.6
4: Excellent (%)	64.3	61.9	40.0	55.6
3: Good (%)	28.6	28.6	50.0	44.4
2: Fair (%)	7.1	9.5	10.0	.
Total (N)	28	21	10	9

C1m: Dept admin make rational decisions	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.4	3.5	3.1	3.3
4: Excellent (%)	55.2	54.5	27.3	33.3
3: Good (%)	31.0	36.4	63.6	66.7
2: Fair (%)	13.8	9.1	.	.
1: Poor (%)	.	.	9.1	.
Total (N)	29	22	11	9

C1n: Dept admin make equitable decisions	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.4	3.4	3.2	3.2
4: Excellent (%)	50.0	60.0	36.4	33.3
3: Good (%)	39.3	20.0	45.5	55.6
2: Fair (%)	10.7	15.0	18.2	11.1
1: Poor (%)	.	5.0	.	.
Total (N)	28	20	11	9

C1o: Dept admin promote diversity within dept	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	2.8	3.1	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	40.7	29.4	36.4	.
3: Good (%)	37.0	29.4	36.4	83.3
2: Fair (%)	18.5	29.4	27.3	16.7
1: Poor (%)	3.7	11.8	.	.
Total (N)	27	17	11	6

C2a: College admin communication with faculty	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.6	2.3	2.7	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	9.7	4.3	30.0	20.0
3: Good (%)	51.6	34.8	30.0	60.0
2: Fair (%)	29.0	47.8	20.0	10.0
1: Poor (%)	9.7	13.0	20.0	10.0
Total (N)	31	23	10	10

C2b: College admin seek faculty input for vision	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.2	2.2	2.6	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	6.7	9.1	20.0	11.1
3: Good (%)	30.0	36.4	40.0	44.4
2: Fair (%)	43.3	22.7	20.0	44.4
1: Poor (%)	20.0	31.8	20.0	.
Total (N)	30	22	10	9

C2c: College admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.2	2.0	2.4	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	3.4	.	10.0	12.5
3: Good (%)	44.8	30.0	30.0	37.5
2: Fair (%)	24.1	35.0	50.0	50.0
1: Poor (%)	27.6	35.0	10.0	.
Total (N)	29	20	10	8

C2d: College admin grant departmental autonomy	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	3.1	3.1	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	17.9	30.0	25.0	14.3
3: Good (%)	53.6	45.0	62.5	57.1
2: Fair (%)	17.9	25.0	12.5	28.6
1: Poor (%)	10.7	.	.	.
Total (N)	28	20	8	7

C2e: College admin set clear and explicit priorities	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.5	2.9	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	10.3	4.5	30.0	33.3
3: Good (%)	58.6	50.0	50.0	33.3
2: Fair (%)	27.6	36.4	.	22.2
1: Poor (%)	3.4	9.1	20.0	11.1
Total (N)	29	22	10	9

C2f: College admin appreciate your contrib to mission	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.7	2.6	2.9	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	17.9	13.0	25.0	.
3: Good (%)	42.9	39.1	50.0	55.6
2: Fair (%)	28.6	39.1	12.5	44.4
1: Poor (%)	10.7	8.7	12.5	.
Total (N)	28	23	8	9

C2g: College admin conflict resolution	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.4	2.1	2.4	2.5
4: Excellent (%)	3.7	.	.	16.7
3: Good (%)	44.4	41.2	62.5	16.7
2: Fair (%)	40.7	23.5	12.5	66.7
1: Poor (%)	11.1	35.3	25.0	.
Total (N)	27	17	8	6

C2h: College admin provide necessary resources	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.6	2.6	2.6	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	10.0	8.7	18.2	.
3: Good (%)	60.0	39.1	45.5	70.0
2: Fair (%)	6.7	52.2	18.2	20.0
1: Poor (%)	23.3	.	18.2	10.0
Total (N)	30	23	11	10

C2i: College admin allocate resources fairly	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.6	2.5	2.6	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	13.8	9.5	10.0	11.1
3: Good (%)	44.8	47.6	50.0	77.8
2: Fair (%)	24.1	28.6	30.0	.
1: Poor (%)	17.2	14.3	10.0	11.1
Total (N)	29	21	10	9

C2j: College admin serve as advocate for college to univ	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	3.3	3.1	3.4
4: Excellent (%)	32.0	44.4	44.4	50.0
3: Good (%)	40.0	44.4	33.3	37.5
2: Fair (%)	20.0	11.1	11.1	12.5
1: Poor (%)	8.0	.	11.1	.
Total (N)	25	18	9	8

C2k: College admin support academic freedom	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.2	3.1	3.2	3.3
4: Excellent (%)	38.5	36.4	40.0	25.0
3: Good (%)	46.2	45.5	50.0	75.0
2: Fair (%)	7.7	13.6	.	.
1: Poor (%)	7.7	4.5	10.0	.
Total (N)	26	22	10	8

C2l: College admin make rational decisions	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8	2.9	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	22.2	19.0	18.2	14.3
3: Good (%)	48.1	42.9	63.6	42.9
2: Fair (%)	22.2	33.3	9.1	42.9
1: Poor (%)	7.4	4.8	9.1	.
Total (N)	27	21	11	7

C2m: College admin make equitable decisions	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	2.2	2.9	2.5
4: Excellent (%)	22.2	9.5	11.1	12.5
3: Good (%)	48.1	33.3	66.7	37.5
2: Fair (%)	25.9	28.6	22.2	37.5
1: Poor (%)	3.7	28.6	.	12.5
Total (N)	27	21	9	8

C2n: College admin promote diversity within college	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	2.7	3.1	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	26.9	25.0	27.3	.
3: Good (%)	53.8	30.0	54.5	75.0
2: Fair (%)	11.5	35.0	18.2	25.0
1: Poor (%)	7.7	10.0	.	.
Total (N)	26	20	11	8

C3a: Univ admin communication with faculty	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.3	2.0	2.3	2.1
4: Excellent (%)	3.4	4.5	.	.
3: Good (%)	44.8	31.8	50.0	14.3
2: Fair (%)	31.0	27.3	25.0	85.7
1: Poor (%)	20.7	36.4	25.0	.
Total (N)	29	22	8	7

C3b: Univ admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.3	2.0	2.1	2.3
4: Excellent (%)	9.1	.	.	.
3: Good (%)	31.8	33.3	37.5	33.3
2: Fair (%)	40.9	33.3	37.5	66.7
1: Poor (%)	18.2	33.3	25.0	.
Total (N)	22	12	8	3

C3c: Univ admin set clear and explicit priorities	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.7	2.2	2.6	2.5
4: Excellent (%)	15.4	.	12.5	.
3: Good (%)	42.3	38.9	50.0	50.0
2: Fair (%)	38.5	38.9	25.0	50.0
1: Poor (%)	3.8	22.2	12.5	.
Total (N)	26	18	8	4

C3d: Univ admin serves as advocate for univ to constituents	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.2	2.7	2.5	2.5
4: Excellent (%)	30.4	13.3	12.5	.
3: Good (%)	56.5	60.0	50.0	50.0
2: Fair (%)	13.0	13.3	12.5	50.0
1: Poor (%)	.	13.3	25.0	.
Total (N)	23	15	8	4

C3e: Univ admin support academic freedom	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	3.0	2.9	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	20.8	33.3	.	.
3: Good (%)	70.8	42.9	87.5	80.0
2: Fair (%)	4.2	9.5	12.5	20.0
1: Poor (%)	4.2	14.3	.	.
Total (N)	24	21	8	5

C3f: Univ admin make rational decisions	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	2.3	2.7	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	9.1	.	28.6	.
3: Good (%)	72.7	50.0	28.6	66.7
2: Fair (%)	18.2	28.6	28.6	33.3
1: Poor (%)	.	21.4	14.3	.
Total (N)	22	14	7	3

C3g: Univ admin make equitable decisions	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.7	2.3	2.6	2.3
4: Excellent (%)	9.1	.	28.6	.
3: Good (%)	59.1	53.3	28.6	33.3
2: Fair (%)	27.3	26.7	14.3	66.7
1: Poor (%)	4.5	20.0	28.6	.
Total (N)	22	15	7	3

C3h: Univ admin promote diversity within university	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	2.8	2.9	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	14.3	29.4	25.0	.
3: Good (%)	71.4	35.3	50.0	60.0
2: Fair (%)	9.5	23.5	12.5	40.0
1: Poor (%)	4.8	11.8	12.5	.
Total (N)	21	17	8	5

Section D: Faculty-Administration Relationships

D1a: I am encouraged to give input on curricular issues	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.4	3.1	3.5	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	53.3	30.4	45.5	10.0
3: Agree (%)	36.7	56.5	54.5	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	10.0	8.7	.	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	4.3	.	10.0
Total (N)	30	23	11	10

D1b: I am encouraged to give input on prog assessment	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.3	3.0	2.9	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	46.7	26.1	9.1	.
3: Agree (%)	40.0	56.5	72.7	44.4
2: Disagree (%)	13.3	13.0	18.2	44.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	4.3	.	11.1
Total (N)	30	23	11	9

D1c: I am encouraged to give input on dept hiring	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.4	3.2	3.1	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	43.3	43.5	36.4	10.0
3: Agree (%)	53.3	39.1	36.4	70.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	8.7	27.3	10.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.3	8.7	.	10.0
Total (N)	30	23	11	10

D1d: I am encouraged to give input on college admin appointments	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.5	2.5	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	23.3	13.0	9.1	10.0
3: Agree (%)	43.3	43.5	45.5	70.0
2: Disagree (%)	26.7	26.1	36.4	10.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.7	17.4	9.1	10.0
Total (N)	30	23	11	10

D1e: I am encouraged to give input on university admin appointments	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.5	2.3	2.5	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	13.3	8.7	.	.
3: Agree (%)	33.3	30.4	54.5	11.1
2: Disagree (%)	43.3	43.5	45.5	77.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	10.0	17.4	.	11.1
Total (N)	30	23	11	9

D2: Familiarity with academic program assessment in dept	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	3.0	2.9	2.1
4: Very familiar (%)	35.5	34.8	18.2	.
3: Somewhat familiar (%)	38.7	30.4	54.5	30.0
2: Not very familiar (%)	25.8	30.4	27.3	50.0
1: Not at all familiar (%)	.	4.3	.	20.0
Total (N)	31	23	11	10

D3a: Understanding of resource allocation to university	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.5	2.2	2.3	1.6
4: Very well (%)	12.9	4.3	.	.
3: Fairly well (%)	32.3	21.7	36.4	.
2: Not very well (%)	41.9	60.9	54.5	60.0
1: Not at all (%)	12.9	13.0	9.1	40.0
Total (N)	31	23	11	10

D3b: Understanding of resource allocation to college	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.4	2.3	2.5	1.9
4: Very well (%)	6.5	4.3	.	.
3: Fairly well (%)	35.5	34.8	54.5	20.0
2: Not very well (%)	51.6	47.8	45.5	50.0
1: Not at all (%)	6.5	13.0	.	30.0
Total (N)	31	23	11	10

D3c: Understanding of resource allocation to department	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	2.6	2.9	2.7
4: Very well (%)	32.3	13.0	27.3	20.0
3: Fairly well (%)	29.0	39.1	36.4	40.0
2: Not very well (%)	35.5	43.5	36.4	30.0
1: Not at all (%)	3.2	4.3	.	10.0
Total (N)	31	23	11	10

D3d: Understanding of resource allocation within department	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.4	3.2	3.5	3.0
4: Very well (%)	60.0	43.5	54.5	30.0
3: Fairly well (%)	20.0	39.1	36.4	40.0
2: Not very well (%)	20.0	13.0	9.1	30.0
1: Not at all (%)	.	4.3	.	.
Total (N)	30	23	11	10

D4: Faculty have sufficient input on dept resource allocation	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	3.0	2.8	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.8	27.3	9.1	20.0
3: Agree (%)	61.3	45.5	63.6	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	9.7	27.3	27.3	30.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.2	.	.	.
Total (N)	31	22	11	10

D5: Dept faculty searches/appointments are collegial and inclusive	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.5	3.2	3.1	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	51.6	45.5	36.4	40.0
3: Agree (%)	45.2	36.4	45.5	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	13.6	9.1	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.2	4.5	9.1	.
Total (N)	31	22	11	10

D6a: Relations between faculty in dept and dept admin	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.6	3.5	3.2	3.7
4: Excellent (%)	63.3	50.0	36.4	70.0
3: Good (%)	33.3	45.5	45.5	30.0
2: Fair (%)	.	4.5	18.2	.
1: Poor (%)	3.3	.	.	.
Total (N)	30	22	11	10

D6b: Relations between faculty in dept and college admin	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8	2.9	3.3
4: Excellent (%)	9.7	30.4	20.0	33.3
3: Good (%)	64.5	34.8	60.0	66.7
2: Fair (%)	19.4	21.7	10.0	.
1: Poor (%)	6.5	13.0	10.0	.
Total (N)	31	23	10	9

D6c: Relations between faculty in dept and univ admin	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.2	2.2	2.6	2.0
4: Excellent (%)	4.5	.	14.3	.
3: Good (%)	40.9	40.0	42.9	.
2: Fair (%)	27.3	40.0	28.6	100.0
1: Poor (%)	27.3	20.0	14.3	.
Total (N)	22	15	7	3

D6d: Relations between all faculty and univ admin	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.4	2.1	2.5	2.0
3: Good (%)	47.6	33.3	75.0	.
2: Fair (%)	42.9	40.0	.	100.0
1: Poor (%)	9.5	26.7	25.0	.
Total (N)	21	15	4	1

D7a: Faculty Senate effective commun between faculty and univ admin	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.1	2.3	2.8	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	13.3	16.7	.
3: Agree (%)	29.2	26.7	66.7	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	54.2	40.0	.	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	16.7	20.0	16.7	25.0
Total (N)	24	15	6	4

D7b: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty in general	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.2	2.1	2.8	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	7.1	16.7	.
3: Agree (%)	34.8	28.6	66.7	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	47.8	28.6	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	17.4	35.7	16.7	33.3
Total (N)	23	14	6	3

D7c: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty like me	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.1	1.8	2.5	1.7
3: Agree (%)	27.3	15.4	66.7	.
2: Disagree (%)	59.1	46.2	16.7	66.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	13.6	38.5	16.7	33.3
Total (N)	22	13	6	3

D8: Effectiveness of university grievance procedures	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.7	2.4	2.2	3.0
4: Very effective (%)	26.3	11.1	20.0	.
3: Somewhat effective (%)	31.6	44.4	20.0	100.0
2: Not very effective (%)	26.3	22.2	20.0	.
1: Not at all effective (%)	15.8	22.2	40.0	.
Total (N)	19	9	5	1

D9: Importance of "ombuds" for informal conflict resolution	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.5	3.5	3.6	3.6
4: Very important (%)	60.0	52.2	63.6	60.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	30.0	43.5	36.4	40.0
2: Not very important (%)	10.0	4.3	.	.
Total (N)	30	23	11	10

Section E: Diversity/Multiculturalism

E1: Importance of institutional emphasis on diversity/Multiculturalism	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.4	3.7	3.5	2.9
4: Very important (%)	46.7	73.9	54.5	11.1
3: Somewhat important (%)	46.7	21.7	45.5	66.7
2: Not very important (%)	6.7	4.3	.	22.2
Total (N)	30	23	11	9

E2: Importance of diversity to enhanced learning in own classroom	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0	3.1	2.1
4: Very important (%)	17.2	39.1	27.3	.
3: Somewhat important (%)	55.2	21.7	54.5	25.0
2: Not very important (%)	27.6	34.8	18.2	62.5
1: Not at all important (%)	.	4.3	.	12.5
Total (N)	29	23	11	8

E3: NCSU prepares students to live and work in diverse society	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.5	2.9	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	9.1	13.3	11.1	14.3
3: Agree (%)	63.6	40.0	77.8	85.7
2: Disagree (%)	22.7	26.7	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.5	20.0	11.1	.
Total (N)	22	15	9	7

E4a: My dept recruits historically underrepresented students	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9	3.1	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	22.2	26.3	28.6	14.3
3: Agree (%)	55.6	42.1	57.1	71.4
2: Disagree (%)	18.5	26.3	14.3	14.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.7	5.3	.	.
Total (N)	27	19	7	7

E4b: My dept retains historically underrepresented students	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0	3.0	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	19.2	22.2	28.6	.
3: Agree (%)	69.2	55.6	57.1	85.7
2: Disagree (%)	7.7	22.2	.	14.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.8	.	14.3	.
Total (N)	26	18	7	7

E4c: My dept supports historically underrepresented students	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	2.8	2.7	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	20.0	22.2	28.6	.
3: Agree (%)	68.0	50.0	42.9	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	12.0	16.7	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	11.1	28.6	.
Total (N)	25	18	7	6

E4d: My dept recruits historically underrepresented faculty	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	2.4	3.0	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	26.9	5.9	28.6	.
3: Agree (%)	50.0	52.9	42.9	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	23.1	17.6	28.6	66.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	23.5	.	.
Total (N)	26	17	7	3

E4e: My dept retains historically underrepresented faculty	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	2.5	2.9	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	26.9	11.8	28.6	.
3: Agree (%)	50.0	47.1	42.9	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	19.2	17.6	14.3	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.8	23.5	14.3	.
Total (N)	26	17	7	4

E4f: My dept supports historically underrepresented faculty	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	2.4	2.9	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.0	5.9	28.6	.
3: Agree (%)	58.3	47.1	42.9	75.0
2: Disagree (%)	12.5	29.4	14.3	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.2	17.6	14.3	.
Total (N)	24	17	7	4

E5a: Dept environ accepting/respectful of age	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.6	3.5	3.3	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	58.6	57.1	40.0	62.5
3: Agree (%)	41.4	38.1	50.0	37.5
2: Disagree (%)	.	4.8	10.0	.
Total (N)	29	21	10	8

E5b: Dept environ accepting/respectful of disability status	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.5	3.5	3.4	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	57.1	64.7	44.4	28.6
3: Agree (%)	38.1	29.4	55.6	71.4
2: Disagree (%)	4.8	.	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	5.9	.	.
Total (N)	21	17	9	7

E5c: Dept environ accepting/respectful of gender	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.6	3.5	3.2	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	62.1	56.5	36.4	62.5
3: Agree (%)	37.9	39.1	45.5	37.5
2: Disagree (%)	.	4.3	18.2	.
Total (N)	29	23	11	8

E5d: Dept environ accepting/respectful of military status	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.6	3.5	3.7	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	56.0	58.8	66.7	50.0
3: Agree (%)	44.0	35.3	33.3	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	5.9	.	.
Total (N)	25	17	6	6

E5e: Dept environ accepting/respectful of nationality/ethnic origin	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.5	3.6	3.4	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	58.6	66.7	40.0	62.5
3: Agree (%)	37.9	28.6	60.0	37.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.4	4.8	.	.
Total (N)	29	21	10	8

E5f: Dept environ accepting/respectful of race and color	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.5	3.5	3.2	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	53.6	61.9	36.4	57.1
3: Agree (%)	42.9	33.3	45.5	42.9
2: Disagree (%)	.	.	18.2	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.6	4.8	.	.
Total (N)	28	21	11	7

E5g: Dept environ accepting/respectful of religion	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.6	3.5	3.3	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	57.7	57.9	44.4	42.9
3: Agree (%)	42.3	36.8	44.4	57.1
2: Disagree (%)	.	.	11.1	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	5.3	.	.
Total (N)	26	19	9	7

E5h: Dept environ accepting/respectful of sexual orientation	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.6	3.5	3.3	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	60.9	57.9	42.9	50.0
3: Agree (%)	39.1	36.8	42.9	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	.	14.3	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	5.3	.	.
Total (N)	23	19	7	8

E6a: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of age	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.8	3.6	3.3	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	76.7	61.9	44.4	66.7
3: Agree (%)	23.3	33.3	44.4	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	.	4.8	11.1	.
Total (N)	30	21	9	9

E6b: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of disability status	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.8	3.5	3.5	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	76.0	57.9	50.0	62.5
3: Agree (%)	24.0	36.8	50.0	37.5
2: Disagree (%)	.	5.3	.	.
Total (N)	25	19	8	8

E6c: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of gender	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.8	3.6	3.2	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	76.7	61.9	40.0	66.7
3: Agree (%)	23.3	38.1	40.0	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	.	.	20.0	.
Total (N)	30	21	10	9

E6d: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of military status	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.8	3.5	3.6	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	75.0	55.6	57.1	62.5
3: Agree (%)	25.0	38.9	42.9	37.5
2: Disagree (%)	.	5.6	.	.
Total (N)	28	18	7	8

E6e: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of national/ethnic origin	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.8	3.5	3.3	3.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	75.9	61.9	40.0	75.0
3: Agree (%)	24.1	33.3	50.0	25.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	.	10.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	4.8	.	.
Total (N)	29	21	10	8

E6f: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of race and color	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.7	3.5	3.2	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	72.4	55.0	40.0	66.7
3: Agree (%)	27.6	40.0	40.0	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	.	.	20.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	5.0	.	.
Total (N)	29	20	10	9

E6g: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of religion	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.8	3.4	3.3	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	75.9	55.6	44.4	66.7
3: Agree (%)	24.1	38.9	44.4	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	.	.	11.1	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	5.6	.	.
Total (N)	29	18	9	9

E6h: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of sexual orientation	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.8	3.5	3.3	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	76.0	55.0	37.5	66.7
3: Agree (%)	24.0	40.0	50.0	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	.	.	12.5	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	5.0	.	.
Total (N)	25	20	8	9

E7: Faculty diversity/multiculturalism enhancement of intellectual diversity in dept	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.7	2.8	2.7	2.3
4: A great deal (%)	10.0	20.0	18.2	.
3: Some (%)	56.7	45.0	45.5	37.5
2: A little (%)	26.7	25.0	27.3	50.0
1: Not at all (%)	6.7	10.0	9.1	12.5
Total (N)	30	20	11	8

E8: Inclusion of diversity-related topics, scholarship, etc in your courses	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	1.6	1.7	2.0	1.1
4: A great deal (%)	.	8.7	18.2	.
3: Some (%)	17.2	17.4	18.2	.
2: A little (%)	20.7	13.0	9.1	14.3
1: Not at all (%)	62.1	60.9	54.5	85.7
Total (N)	29	23	11	7

E9a: Interest in research, extension, art endeavors outside U.S.	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	3.0	2.6	2.3
4: A great deal (%)	40.0	47.8	27.3	22.2
3: Some (%)	40.0	21.7	27.3	22.2
2: A little (%)	6.7	17.4	27.3	22.2
1: None (%)	13.3	13.0	18.2	33.3
Total (N)	30	23	11	9

E9b: Interest in teaching study abroad	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.5	2.5	2.3	2.3
4: A great deal (%)	20.0	30.4	9.1	11.1
3: Some (%)	33.3	21.7	36.4	44.4
2: A little (%)	20.0	13.0	27.3	11.1
1: None (%)	26.7	34.8	27.3	33.3
Total (N)	30	23	11	9

E9c: Interest in participating in spring break service learning	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	1.6	1.8	1.9	2.1
4: A great deal (%)	.	9.1	9.1	11.1
3: Some (%)	17.2	18.2	18.2	33.3
2: A little (%)	24.1	13.6	27.3	11.1
1: None (%)	58.6	59.1	45.5	44.4
Total (N)	29	22	11	9

E9d: Interest in participating in international service projects	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.6	2.6	2.4	2.4
4: A great deal (%)	13.8	31.8	9.1	22.2
3: Some (%)	44.8	27.3	36.4	22.2
2: A little (%)	24.1	13.6	36.4	33.3
1: None (%)	17.2	27.3	18.2	22.2
Total (N)	29	22	11	9

E9e: Interest in teaching in international studies major	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	1.6	1.9	1.8	1.6
4: A great deal (%)	3.4	13.0	.	.
3: Some (%)	13.8	17.4	18.2	22.2
2: A little (%)	17.2	13.0	45.5	11.1
1: None (%)	65.5	56.5	36.4	66.7
Total (N)	29	23	11	9

E9f: Interest in advising international students	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.3	2.6	2.3	1.4
4: A great deal (%)	17.2	26.1	27.3	.
3: Some (%)	27.6	30.4	18.2	11.1
2: A little (%)	27.6	21.7	9.1	22.2
1: None (%)	27.6	21.7	45.5	66.7
Total (N)	29	23	11	9

Section F: Working Relationships

F1: There is unity/cohesion among faculty in my department	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.3	2.9	2.7	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	40.0	26.1	18.2	55.6
3: Agree (%)	46.7	43.5	45.5	22.2
2: Disagree (%)	13.3	21.7	27.3	22.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	8.7	9.1	.
Total (N)	30	23	11	9

F2a: Good communication between my students and me	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.3	3.3	3.5	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	36.7	27.3	45.5	44.4
3: Agree (%)	56.7	72.7	54.5	44.4
2: Disagree (%)	3.3	.	.	11.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.3	.	.	.
Total (N)	30	22	11	9

F2b: Good communication between dept and our students	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	3.1	2.7	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	14.3	22.2	18.2	33.3
3: Agree (%)	75.0	66.7	45.5	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	7.1	5.6	27.3	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.6	5.6	9.1	.
Total (N)	28	18	11	9

F2c: Good communication between faculty in my dept	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.3	3.0	2.9	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	33.3	30.4	18.2	33.3
3: Agree (%)	63.3	47.8	54.5	44.4
2: Disagree (%)	3.3	17.4	27.3	22.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	4.3	.	.
Total (N)	30	23	11	9

F2d: Good communication between my dept and other depts	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8	2.6	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.0	13.6	9.1	14.3
3: Agree (%)	73.3	59.1	45.5	57.1
2: Disagree (%)	13.3	22.7	45.5	28.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.3	4.5	.	.
Total (N)	30	22	11	7

F2e: Good communication between my college and other colleges	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.5	2.2	2.8	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	4.3	.	20.0	.
3: Agree (%)	60.9	52.9	40.0	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	17.4	17.6	40.0	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	17.4	29.4	.	.
Total (N)	23	17	5	4

F3: Dept environ promotes respectful dialogue between diverse perspectives	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.5	3.2	2.9	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	56.7	47.8	18.2	44.4
3: Agree (%)	40.0	34.8	63.6	44.4
2: Disagree (%)	.	8.7	9.1	11.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.3	8.7	9.1	.
Total (N)	30	23	11	9

F4a: Frequency given/recvd teaching advice in dept past few years	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	3.1	3.5	2.3
Frequently (%)	20.0	34.8	63.6	11.1
Sometimes (%)	63.3	43.5	27.3	33.3
Seldom (%)	10.0	17.4	.	33.3
Never (%)	6.7	4.3	9.1	22.2
Total (N)	30	23	11	9

F4b: Frequency given/recvd research/artistic feedback in dept past few yrs	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.5	3.3	3.5	2.7
Frequently (%)	70.0	43.5	54.5	.
Sometimes (%)	16.7	47.8	36.4	66.7
Seldom (%)	6.7	4.3	9.1	33.3
Never (%)	6.7	4.3	.	.
Total (N)	30	23	11	9

F4c: Frequency given/recvd help with dept/college bureaucracy past few yrs	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.2	3.1	3.2	2.7
Frequently (%)	43.3	39.1	36.4	.
Sometimes (%)	33.3	34.8	45.5	66.7
Seldom (%)	20.0	21.7	18.2	33.3
Never (%)	3.3	4.3	.	.
Total (N)	30	23	11	9

F4d: Frequency given/recvd help undrsnd reappointment, promotion, tenure past few yrs	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.3	3.1	3.3	2.8
Frequently (%)	40.0	30.4	45.5	.
Sometimes (%)	50.0	52.2	36.4	77.8
Seldom (%)	6.7	13.0	18.2	22.2
Never (%)	3.3	4.3	.	.
Total (N)	30	23	11	9

F4e: Frequency given/recvd help with work/personal balance issues past few yrs	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.6	2.4	2.5	2.0
Frequently (%)	20.0	17.4	9.1	.
Sometimes (%)	30.0	30.4	45.5	11.1
Seldom (%)	40.0	30.4	27.3	77.8
Never (%)	10.0	21.7	18.2	11.1
Total (N)	30	23	11	9

F5a: Frequency of collab with faculty in your dept	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.8	3.7	3.5	3.4
Frequently (%)	80.0	69.6	54.5	55.6
Sometimes (%)	16.7	26.1	45.5	33.3
Seldom (%)	3.3	4.3	.	11.1
Total (N)	30	23	11	9

F5b: Frequency of collab with faculty in other NCSU depts	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.2	3.3	3.0	2.6
Frequently (%)	43.3	43.5	27.3	33.3
Sometimes (%)	36.7	43.5	54.5	22.2
Seldom (%)	16.7	8.7	9.1	11.1
Never (%)	3.3	4.3	9.1	33.3
Total (N)	30	23	11	9

F5c: Frequency of collab with faculty from other universities	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.3	3.1	3.1	2.1
Frequently (%)	43.3	39.1	18.2	11.1
Sometimes (%)	40.0	39.1	72.7	22.2
Seldom (%)	16.7	13.0	9.1	33.3
Never (%)	.	8.7	.	33.3
Total (N)	30	23	11	9

F5d: Frequency of collab with non-faculty external to NCSU	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	2.5	2.6	2.1
Frequently (%)	30.0	21.7	18.2	.
Sometimes (%)	33.3	39.1	54.5	44.4
Seldom (%)	30.0	8.7	.	22.2
Never (%)	6.7	30.4	27.3	33.3
Total (N)	30	23	11	9

Section G: Faculty Support & Professional Development

G1a: Satisfaction with level of courses	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.5	3.4	3.6	3.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	51.7	40.0	63.6	50.0
3: Satisfied (%)	48.3	55.0	36.4	37.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	5.0	.	12.5
Total (N)	29	20	11	8

G1b: Satisfaction with number of courses	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.5	3.1	3.5	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	50.0	22.7	45.5	37.5
3: Satisfied (%)	46.4	68.2	54.5	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	3.6	9.1	.	12.5
Total (N)	28	22	11	8

G1c: Satisfaction with choice in courses	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.5	3.1	3.3	3.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	51.7	27.3	36.4	37.5
3: Satisfied (%)	44.8	63.6	54.5	62.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	3.4	4.5	9.1	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	4.5	.	.
Total (N)	29	22	11	8

G1d: Satisfaction with course content discretion	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.8	3.5	3.5	3.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	75.9	59.1	54.5	50.0
3: Satisfied (%)	24.1	31.8	45.5	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	9.1	.	.
Total (N)	29	22	11	8

G1e: Satisfaction with number of students	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.4	3.2	3.4	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	44.8	31.8	36.4	25.0
3: Satisfied (%)	55.2	59.1	63.6	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	9.1	.	25.0
Total (N)	29	22	11	8

G1f: Satisfaction with quality of undergraduates	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	2.7	3.3	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	33.3	.	33.3	50.0
3: Satisfied (%)	44.4	66.7	66.7	.
2: Dissatisfied (%)	22.2	33.3	.	50.0
Total (N)	9	6	3	2

G1g: Satisfaction with quality of graduate students	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0	2.9	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	14.3	18.2	18.2	25.0
3: Satisfied (%)	75.0	68.2	54.5	62.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	10.7	13.6	27.3	12.5
Total (N)	28	22	11	8

G1h: Satisfaction with access to grad TAs	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.0	2.1	2.1	2.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	.	14.3	.
3: Satisfied (%)	40.0	42.9	14.3	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	20.0	28.6	42.9	66.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	40.0	28.6	28.6	.
Total (N)	10	7	7	3

G1i: Satisfaction with access to grad RAs	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.2	1.9	2.3	2.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.7	.	12.5	.
3: Satisfied (%)	46.7	18.2	25.0	.
2: Dissatisfied (%)	6.7	54.5	37.5	100.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	40.0	27.3	25.0	.
Total (N)	15	11	8	3

G2a: NCSU supports innovative teaching	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.4	3.0	3.1	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	39.3	33.3	40.0	25.0
3: Agree (%)	57.1	47.6	40.0	75.0
2: Disagree (%)	3.6	9.5	10.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	9.5	10.0	.
Total (N)	28	21	10	8

G2b: NCSU supports innovative research and scholarly activity	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.4	3.1	3.1	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	46.7	38.1	27.3	37.5
3: Agree (%)	46.7	42.9	54.5	62.5
2: Disagree (%)	6.7	14.3	18.2	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	4.8	.	.
Total (N)	30	21	11	8

G2c: NCSU supports innovative creative artistry and literature	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0	3.0	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	28.6	.	50.0	.
3: Agree (%)	57.1	100.0	.	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	.	50.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	14.3	.	.	.
Total (N)	7	2	2	1

G2d: NCSU supports innovative extension/engagement/econ dev activity	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.2	3.2	3.2	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	36.4	33.3	33.3	20.0
3: Agree (%)	54.5	53.3	55.6	80.0
2: Disagree (%)	4.5	13.3	11.1	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.5	.	.	.
Total (N)	22	15	9	5

G3a: NCSU rewards innovative teaching	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8	2.5	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	23.3	18.2	18.2	16.7
3: Agree (%)	46.7	50.0	36.4	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	26.7	27.3	27.3	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.3	4.5	18.2	.
Total (N)	30	22	11	6

G3b: NCSU rewards innovative research and scholarly activity	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.3	3.5	3.1	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	50.0	54.5	27.3	25.0
3: Agree (%)	33.3	40.9	54.5	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	16.7	.	18.2	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	4.5	.	.
Total (N)	30	22	11	8

G3c: NCSU rewards innovative creative artistry and literature	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	3.0	3.5	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	.	50.0	.
3: Agree (%)	75.0	100.0	50.0	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	25.0	.	.	.
Total (N)	4	2	2	1

G3d: NCSU rewards innovative extension/engagement/econ dev activity	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9	3.0	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	16.7	14.3	11.1	33.3
3: Agree (%)	66.7	64.3	77.8	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	11.1	21.4	11.1	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.6	.	.	.
Total (N)	18	14	9	3

G4a: Satisfaction: Availability of classroom technology	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	2.9	2.9	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	27.6	14.3	18.2	14.3
3: Satisfied (%)	55.2	66.7	54.5	57.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	13.8	14.3	27.3	28.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	3.4	4.8	.	.
Total (N)	29	21	11	7

G4b: Satisfaction: Teaching reduction for scholarly/prof growth	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.7	2.3	2.7	2.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	17.4	5.9	16.7	.
3: Satisfied (%)	56.5	35.3	33.3	25.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	8.7	41.2	50.0	50.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	17.4	17.6	.	25.0
Total (N)	23	17	6	4

G4c: Satisfaction: Teaching workshop/seminar opportunities	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	3.0	2.6	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	11.1	15.0	10.0	.
3: Satisfied (%)	88.9	70.0	50.0	71.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	15.0	30.0	28.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	.	10.0	.
Total (N)	27	20	10	7

G4d: Satisfaction: Avail of funds to attend teaching conference/wrkshp	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.7	2.4	1.9	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	15.0	14.3	9.1	.
3: Satisfied (%)	45.0	35.7	18.2	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	35.0	28.6	27.3	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.0	21.4	45.5	.
Total (N)	20	14	11	6

G4e: Satisfaction: Learning technology training/support	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9	2.4	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	9.1	14.3	10.0	.
3: Satisfied (%)	63.6	61.9	40.0	83.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	27.3	23.8	30.0	16.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	.	20.0	.
Total (N)	22	21	10	6

G4f: Satisfaction: Campus bookstore meeting course needs	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.2	2.8	2.5	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	22.2	16.7	33.3	.
3: Satisfied (%)	77.8	66.7	16.7	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	.	16.7	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	16.7	33.3	.
Total (N)	9	6	6	2

G4g: Satisfaction: Availability of funds to present work	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.4	2.6	2.1	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	10.3	10.5	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	37.9	47.4	40.0	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	37.9	31.6	30.0	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	13.8	10.5	30.0	.
Total (N)	29	19	10	9

G4h: Satisfaction: Opportunities for scholarly/professional leave	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.6	2.6	2.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	17.9	11.8	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	57.1	52.9	80.0	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	10.7	23.5	.	66.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	14.3	11.8	20.0	.
Total (N)	28	17	5	6

G4i: Satisfaction: Financial support for scholarly/professional leave	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.5	2.6	2.0	2.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	16.0	18.8	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	32.0	37.5	33.3	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	36.0	31.3	33.3	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	16.0	12.5	33.3	16.7
Total (N)	25	16	6	6

G4j: Satisfaction: Leadership development opportunities	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.7	2.6	2.5	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	10.5	9.1	12.5	.
3: Satisfied (%)	63.2	45.5	37.5	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	15.8	45.5	37.5	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	10.5	.	12.5	.
Total (N)	19	11	8	3

G4k: Satisfaction: Support for dept assessment activities	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.5	2.7	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	17.4	7.1	14.3	.
3: Satisfied (%)	56.5	50.0	57.1	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	17.4	28.6	14.3	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	8.7	14.3	14.3	.
Total (N)	23	14	7	2

G4l: Satisfaction: Availability of/access to materials via NCSU Libraries	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	3.2	2.9	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	34.5	27.3	22.2	22.2
3: Satisfied (%)	48.3	63.6	55.6	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	13.8	9.1	11.1	11.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	3.4	.	11.1	.
Total (N)	29	22	9	9

G4m: Satisfaction: Support with dealing with student concerns	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0	3.0	3.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	7.4	23.5	14.3	40.0
3: Satisfied (%)	81.5	58.8	71.4	60.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	7.4	11.8	14.3	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	3.7	5.9	.	.
Total (N)	27	17	7	5

G4n: Satisfaction: Support for technology transfer	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.6	2.5	2.6	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	8.7	7.1	14.3	.
3: Satisfied (%)	60.9	57.1	42.9	83.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	13.0	14.3	28.6	16.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	17.4	21.4	14.3	.
Total (N)	23	14	7	6

G5: Assignment of formal mentor	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Yes (%)	.	36.4	90.9	44.4
No (%)	100.0	63.6	9.1	55.6
Total (N)	30	22	11	9

G6: Mentor helpfulness	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.8	2.8	2.8
4: Very helpful (%)	75.0	30.0	50.0
3: Somewhat helpful (%)	25.0	30.0	.
2: Not very helpful (%)	.	30.0	25.0
1: Not at all helpful (%)	.	10.0	25.0
Total (N)	8	10	4

G7a: Satisfaction: Pre-award support from college for grant/contract	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	2.6	3.1	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	21.4	5.6	22.2	.
3: Satisfied (%)	53.6	61.1	66.7	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	17.9	22.2	11.1	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	7.1	11.1	.	.
Total (N)	28	18	9	2

G7b: Satisfaction: Post-award support from college for grant/contract	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.6	3.3	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	14.8	.	28.6	.
3: Satisfied (%)	51.9	66.7	71.4	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	29.6	27.8	.	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	3.7	5.6	.	.
Total (N)	27	18	7	2

G7c: Satisfaction: Pre-award University support for grant/contract	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.5	2.4	2.8	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	4.2	.	12.5	.
3: Satisfied (%)	54.2	50.0	62.5	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	29.2	37.5	12.5	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	12.5	12.5	12.5	.
Total (N)	24	16	8	2

G7d: Satisfaction: Post-award University support for grant/contract	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.4	2.2	2.9	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	4.2	.	14.3	.
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	37.5	71.4	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	25.0	43.8	.	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	20.8	18.8	14.3	.
Total (N)	24	16	7	2

G7e: Satisfaction: Allocation of indirect grant costs to investigator	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.5	2.1	2.7	2.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	3.8	.	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	53.8	31.6	71.4	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	26.9	42.1	28.6	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	15.4	26.3	.	33.3
Total (N)	26	19	7	3

G7f: Satisfaction: Allocation of indirect grant costs to department	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.2	2.2	2.6	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	4.3	5.3	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	30.4	26.3	57.1	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	47.8	47.4	42.9	50.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	17.4	21.1	.	.
Total (N)	23	19	7	2

G7g: Satisfaction: PI control over indirect cost allocation	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.2	2.0	2.4	2.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	3.8	.	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	38.5	25.0	57.1	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	30.8	45.0	28.6	66.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	26.9	30.0	14.3	.
Total (N)	26	20	7	3

Section H: Performance Review, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure

H1: Faculty performance review standards are clearly stated	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.7	3.3	2.8	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	66.7	57.1	27.3	37.5
3: Agree (%)	33.3	19.0	45.5	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	19.0	9.1	12.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	4.8	18.2	.
Total (N)	30	21	11	8

H2: Faculty performance review procedures are clearly stated	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.7	3.4	3.0	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	66.7	57.1	27.3	25.0
3: Agree (%)	33.3	33.3	54.5	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	4.8	9.1	12.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	4.8	9.1	12.5
Total (N)	30	21	11	8

H3: SME is consistent with departmental vision	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.4	3.4	3.1	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	39.3	45.0	27.3	37.5
3: Agree (%)	60.7	45.0	63.6	62.5
2: Disagree (%)	.	10.0	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	9.1	.
Total (N)	28	20	11	8

H4: SME is consistent with departmental promotion standards	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.5	3.4	3.0	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	53.6	50.0	22.2	37.5
3: Agree (%)	46.4	40.0	66.7	37.5
2: Disagree (%)	.	10.0	.	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	11.1	.
Total (N)	28	20	9	8

H5a: Performance Review feedback appropriately based on SME	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.3	3.5	3.2	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	37.0	60.0	45.5	12.5
3: Agree (%)	59.3	30.0	27.3	87.5
2: Disagree (%)	3.7	5.0	27.3	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	5.0	.	.
Total (N)	27	20	11	8

H5b: Performance Review feedback helpful for professional Development	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.2	3.0	3.2	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	35.7	28.6	30.0	.
3: Agree (%)	46.4	52.4	60.0	87.5
2: Disagree (%)	17.9	4.8	10.0	12.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	14.3	.	.
Total (N)	28	21	10	8

H5c: Performance Review feedback corresponds with my perceptions of own performance	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.4	3.2	3.0	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	51.7	47.6	27.3	.
3: Agree (%)	41.4	33.3	54.5	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	3.4	9.5	9.1	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.4	9.5	9.1	.
Total (N)	29	21	11	8

H5d: Performance Review feedback helps understand relation to other faculty	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	2.6	2.5	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	27.6	28.6	18.2	.
3: Agree (%)	48.3	23.8	27.3	37.5
2: Disagree (%)	20.7	28.6	45.5	62.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.4	19.0	9.1	.
Total (N)	29	21	11	8

H5e: Feedback given appropriate weight in merit raises	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9	2.9	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	24.1	35.0	27.3	25.0
3: Agree (%)	58.6	35.0	54.5	62.5
2: Disagree (%)	13.8	15.0	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.4	15.0	18.2	12.5
Total (N)	29	20	11	8

H6: Understanding of current Academic Tenure Policy	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.4	3.1	2.6	2.2
4: Very well (%)	44.8	33.3	9.1	.
3: Fairly well (%)	51.7	47.6	45.5	33.3
2: Not very well (%)	3.4	19.0	45.5	55.6
1: Not at all (%)	.	.	.	11.1
Total (N)	29	21	11	9

H7_1: Participated in RPT process as candidate	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
No (%)	33.3	4.8	54.5	44.4
Yes (%)	66.7	95.2	45.5	55.6
Total (N)	30	21	11	9

H7_2: Participated in RPT process as voter	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
No (%)	3.3	19.0	100.0	88.9
Yes (%)	96.7	81.0	.	11.1
Total (N)	30	21	11	9

H7_3: Participated in RPT process as review committee member	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
No (%)	13.3	71.4	100.0	100.0
Yes (%)	86.7	28.6	.	.
Total (N)	30	21	11	9

H7_4: Have never participated in RPT process	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
No (%)	100.0	100.0	36.4	55.6
Yes (%)	.	.	63.6	44.4
Total (N)	30	21	11	9

H8: Understand dept RPT standards	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.7	3.4	2.9	2.7
4: Very well (%)	66.7	57.1	27.3	11.1
3: Fairly well (%)	33.3	23.8	36.4	44.4
2: Not very well (%)	.	19.0	36.4	44.4
Total (N)	30	21	11	9

H9: Understand dept RPT procedures	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.8	3.5	2.8	2.2
4: Very well (%)	80.0	57.1	9.1	.
3: Fairly well (%)	20.0	38.1	63.6	33.3
2: Not very well (%)	.	4.8	27.3	55.6
1: Not at all (%)	.	.	.	11.1
Total (N)	30	21	11	9

H10: Departmental RPT standards applied consistently/fairly	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.6	3.1	2.6	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	66.7	42.9	25.0	25.0
3: Agree (%)	30.0	33.3	37.5	75.0
2: Disagree (%)	3.3	14.3	12.5	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	9.5	25.0	.
Total (N)	30	21	8	4

H11: Departmental RPT procedures applied consistently/fairly	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.7	3.2	2.8	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	65.5	42.9	25.0	.
3: Agree (%)	34.5	47.6	37.5	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	.	25.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	9.5	12.5	.
Total (N)	29	21	8	3

H12a: Sufficient resources for teaching/mentoring students	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	2.6	2.6	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	17.9	10.5	.	.
3: Agree (%)	64.3	52.6	72.7	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	14.3	21.1	18.2	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.6	15.8	9.1	.
Total (N)	28	19	11	7

H12b: Sufficient resources for discovery of knowledge	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.7	2.6	2.8	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	16.7	.	.	.
3: Agree (%)	46.7	64.7	77.8	85.7
2: Disagree (%)	23.3	29.4	22.2	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	13.3	5.9	.	14.3
Total (N)	30	17	9	7

H12c: Sufficient resources for creative artistry and literature	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.7	2.5	3.0	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	33.3	.	.	.
3: Agree (%)	33.3	50.0	100.0	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	50.0	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	33.3	.	.	.
Total (N)	3	2	1	1

H12d: Sufficient resources for tech/managerial innovation	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.5	2.5	2.8	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	13.3	10.0	.	.
3: Agree (%)	46.7	50.0	75.0	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	20.0	20.0	25.0	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	20.0	20.0	.	20.0
Total (N)	15	10	4	5

H12e: Sufficient resources for extension/engagement	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	2.3	2.9	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.0	.	.	.
3: Agree (%)	75.0	42.9	85.7	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	10.0	42.9	14.3	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.0	14.3	.	.
Total (N)	20	14	7	4

H12f: Sufficient resources for professional service	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	2.4	2.6	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	17.9	5.6	.	.
3: Agree (%)	60.7	50.0	60.0	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	21.4	27.8	40.0	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	16.7	.	.
Total (N)	28	18	10	6

H13a: Department rewards teaching/mentoring of students	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	2.8	2.5	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	30.0	19.0	9.1	.
3: Agree (%)	53.3	52.4	36.4	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	16.7	19.0	45.5	40.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	9.5	9.1	.
Total (N)	30	21	11	5

H13b: Department rewards discovery of knowledge	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.6	3.7	2.9	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	56.7	75.0	10.0	66.7
3: Agree (%)	43.3	20.0	70.0	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	.	.	20.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	5.0	.	.
Total (N)	30	20	10	6

H13c: Department rewards creative artistry and literature	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.3	3.0	2.5	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	33.3	50.0	50.0	.
3: Agree (%)	66.7	.	.	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	50.0	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	50.0	.
Total (N)	3	2	2	1

H13d: Department rewards tech/managerial innovation	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9	2.7	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	18.8	33.3	14.3	.
3: Agree (%)	62.5	33.3	57.1	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	18.8	25.0	14.3	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	8.3	14.3	.
Total (N)	16	12	7	3

H13e: Department rewards extension/engagement	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	3.1	2.9	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	24.0	41.2	12.5	25.0
3: Agree (%)	64.0	35.3	62.5	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	12.0	11.8	25.0	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	11.8	.	.
Total (N)	25	17	8	4

H13f: Department rewards professional service	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8	2.9	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.7	25.0	10.0	20.0
3: Agree (%)	71.4	40.0	70.0	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	14.3	25.0	20.0	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.6	10.0	.	.
Total (N)	28	20	10	5

Section I: Post-Tenure Review

I1_1: No experience with PTR	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Has experience (%)	96.7	71.4	.	11.1
No experience (%)	3.3	28.6	100.0	88.9
Total (N)	30	21	11	9

I1_2: Have had PTR Comprehensive Review	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
No (%)	13.3	28.6	100.0	88.9
Yes (%)	86.7	71.4	.	11.1
Total (N)	30	21	11	9

I1_3: Have served on PTR committee	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
No (%)	26.7	81.0	100.0	100.0
Yes (%)	73.3	19.0	.	.
Total (N)	30	21	11	9

I1_4: Have been dept/college administrator in PTR process	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
No (%)	83.3	100.0	100.0	100.0
Yes (%)	16.7	.	.	.
Total (N)	30	21	11	9

I1_5: Had other PTR experience	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
No (%)	86.7	100.0	100.0	100.0
Yes (%)	13.3	.	.	.
Total (N)	30	21	11	9

I2a: Easy to find PTR information on NCSU website	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.2	3.0	2.5	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	37.0	13.3	16.7	.
3: Agree (%)	48.1	73.3	16.7	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	14.8	13.3	66.7	.
Total (N)	27	15	6	2

I2b: PTR process known/understood in department	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.2	2.8	2.3	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	48.3	11.8	.	.
3: Agree (%)	27.6	58.8	37.5	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	24.1	23.5	50.0	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	5.9	12.5	.
Total (N)	29	17	8	3

I2c: Departmental PTR procedures are clear	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.4	2.9	2.3	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	41.4	22.2	.	.
3: Agree (%)	55.2	55.6	50.0	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	3.4	16.7	33.3	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	5.6	16.7	.
Total (N)	29	18	6	2

I2d: Departmental PTR standards are clear	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.4	2.9	2.1	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	50.0	11.8	.	.
3: Agree (%)	35.7	76.5	42.9	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	14.3	5.9	28.6	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	5.9	28.6	.
Total (N)	28	17	7	3

I2e: Departmental PTR procedures are followed equitably	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.5	2.9	2.3	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	57.1	20.0	.	.
3: Agree (%)	32.1	60.0	50.0	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	10.7	6.7	25.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	13.3	25.0	.
Total (N)	28	15	4	2

I2f: Departmental PTR standards are applied fairly	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.4	2.8	2.3	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	55.2	18.8	.	.
3: Agree (%)	34.5	56.3	50.0	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	10.3	12.5	25.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	12.5	25.0	.
Total (N)	29	16	4	2

I2g: Dept PTR committee members are well prepared and trained	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	2.8	2.4	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	31.0	18.2	.	.
3: Agree (%)	51.7	54.5	60.0	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	17.2	18.2	20.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	9.1	20.0	.
Total (N)	29	11	5	1

I3: Overall satisfaction with PTR process	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	2.7	1.5	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	24.1	16.7	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	51.7	55.6	.	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	17.2	11.1	50.0	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.9	16.7	50.0	.
Total (N)	29	18	2	2

Section J: Pay and Compensation

J1a: My salary is competitive within my department	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	2.6	2.4	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	37.0	11.1	11.1	.
3: Agree (%)	48.1	55.6	33.3	80.0
2: Disagree (%)	7.4	11.1	44.4	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.4	22.2	11.1	.
Total (N)	27	18	9	5

J1b: My salary is competitive within my college	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	2.4	2.2	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	38.5	12.5	11.1	.
3: Agree (%)	34.6	43.8	22.2	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	15.4	18.8	44.4	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	11.5	25.0	22.2	.
Total (N)	26	16	9	4

J1c: My salary is competitive within NC State	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.3	2.9	2.7	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	50.0	33.3	14.3	.
3: Agree (%)	31.8	33.3	57.1	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	13.6	25.0	14.3	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.5	8.3	14.3	50.0
Total (N)	22	12	7	4

J1d: My salary is competitive within UNC system	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.6	2.1	1.8	1.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	29.4	.	.	.
3: Agree (%)	29.4	40.0	20.0	.
2: Disagree (%)	17.6	30.0	40.0	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	23.5	30.0	40.0	66.7
Total (N)	17	10	5	3

J1e: My salary is competitive within discipline at comparable institutions	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.2	2.1	1.9	1.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	12.5	5.9	.	.
3: Agree (%)	20.8	17.6	27.3	14.3
2: Disagree (%)	37.5	52.9	36.4	42.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	29.2	23.5	36.4	42.9
Total (N)	24	17	11	7

J2: Understand how faculty salaries determined	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.2	2.7	1.8	2.0
4: Very well (%)	36.7	23.8	.	.
3: Fairly well (%)	50.0	38.1	27.3	33.3
2: Not very well (%)	6.7	19.0	27.3	33.3
1: Not at all (%)	6.7	19.0	45.5	33.3
Total (N)	30	21	11	9

J3: My department links salary increase to meritorious performance	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.2	3.1	2.6	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	32.1	35.0	10.0	12.5
3: Agree (%)	53.6	45.0	50.0	62.5
2: Disagree (%)	14.3	15.0	30.0	12.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	5.0	10.0	12.5
Total (N)	28	20	10	8

J4: I have access to benefits information	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.5	3.4	3.1	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	51.7	52.4	18.2	33.3
3: Agree (%)	44.8	33.3	72.7	44.4
2: Disagree (%)	3.4	14.3	9.1	11.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	.	11.1
Total (N)	29	21	11	9

J5: Healthcare benefits are competitive with other institutions	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	1.8	2.3	1.9	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	7.4	5.6	.	.
3: Agree (%)	11.1	44.4	36.4	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	33.3	27.8	18.2	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	48.1	22.2	45.5	25.0
Total (N)	27	18	11	8

J6: Retirement programs are competitive with other institutions	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.3	2.6	2.7	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	11.1	6.3	.	12.5
3: Agree (%)	37.0	56.3	81.8	62.5
2: Disagree (%)	25.9	31.3	9.1	12.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	25.9	6.3	9.1	12.5
Total (N)	27	16	11	8

J7: Voluntary benefits programs are competitive with other institutions	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.6	3.0	2.4	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	13.6	16.7	.	.
3: Agree (%)	54.5	66.7	57.1	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	13.6	16.7	28.6	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	18.2	.	14.3	.
Total (N)	22	12	7	5

J8: I am satisfied with my compensation at NC State	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.6	2.3	2.3	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.0	4.8	.	11.1
3: Agree (%)	46.7	38.1	27.3	55.6
2: Disagree (%)	36.7	42.9	72.7	11.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.7	14.3	.	22.2
Total (N)	30	21	11	9

J9: Departmental environment enables work/personal life balance	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	2.6	2.7	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	23.3	9.5	.	11.1
3: Agree (%)	63.3	52.4	72.7	22.2
2: Disagree (%)	13.3	28.6	27.3	66.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	9.5	.	.
Total (N)	30	21	11	9

J10: NCSU environment enables work/personal life balance	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	2.6	2.6	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	23.3	.	.	12.5
3: Agree (%)	60.0	65.0	72.7	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	16.7	25.0	18.2	37.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	10.0	9.1	.
Total (N)	30	20	11	8

J11a: Importance of flexible work hours	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.7	3.9	3.7	3.1
4: Very important (%)	70.0	90.5	72.7	22.2
3: Somewhat important (%)	30.0	9.5	27.3	66.7
2: Not very important (%)	.	.	.	11.1
Total (N)	30	21	11	9

J11b: Importance of maternity/paternity leave	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.7	4.0	3.7	3.8
4: Very important (%)	70.0	95.2	72.7	77.8
3: Somewhat important (%)	26.7	4.8	27.3	22.2
2: Not very important (%)	3.3	.	.	.
Total (N)	30	21	11	9

J11c: Importance of family leave time	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.7	3.9	3.6	3.7
4: Very important (%)	66.7	90.5	63.6	66.7
3: Somewhat important (%)	33.3	9.5	36.4	33.3
Total (N)	30	21	11	9

J11d: Importance of altering tenure clock for family concerns	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.7	3.9	3.8	3.8
4: Very important (%)	73.3	90.5	81.8	77.8
3: Somewhat important (%)	23.3	9.5	18.2	22.2
2: Not very important (%)	3.3	.	.	.
Total (N)	30	21	11	9

J11e: Importance of childcare facility on or near campus	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.4	3.6	3.4	3.0
4: Very important (%)	50.0	61.9	45.5	22.2
3: Somewhat important (%)	36.7	33.3	45.5	55.6
2: Not very important (%)	13.3	4.8	9.1	22.2
Total (N)	30	21	11	9

J11f: Importance of tuition remission for dependents	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.7	3.7	3.6	3.2
4: Very important (%)	73.3	81.0	63.6	33.3
3: Somewhat important (%)	20.0	4.8	36.4	55.6
2: Not very important (%)	6.7	14.3	.	11.1
Total (N)	30	21	11	9

Section K: Campus Infrastructure/Physical Environment

K1: I have sufficient clerical/admin support in my dept	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8	2.7	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	26.7	19.0	9.1	.
3: Agree (%)	43.3	52.4	63.6	55.6
2: Disagree (%)	16.7	19.0	18.2	44.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	13.3	9.5	9.1	.
Total (N)	30	21	11	9

K2: I have sufficient tech assistance	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.5	2.2	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	23.3	10.0	.	.
3: Agree (%)	43.3	30.0	36.4	55.6
2: Disagree (%)	26.7	55.0	45.5	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.7	5.0	18.2	11.1
Total (N)	30	20	11	9

K3: There is sufficient support staff in my college	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9	2.5	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	16.7	23.8	.	.
3: Agree (%)	50.0	42.9	45.5	55.6
2: Disagree (%)	26.7	28.6	54.5	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.7	4.8	.	11.1
Total (N)	30	21	11	9

K4a: Satisfaction with office space	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.4	3.3	3.1	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	53.3	42.9	36.4	11.1
3: Satisfied (%)	30.0	52.4	45.5	55.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	16.7	.	9.1	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	4.8	9.1	.
Total (N)	30	21	11	9

K4b: Satisfaction with lab space	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0	2.6	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	29.6	23.5	12.5	.
3: Satisfied (%)	40.7	52.9	50.0	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	25.9	23.5	25.0	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	3.7	.	12.5	.
Total (N)	27	17	8	4

K4c: Satisfaction with classrooms in which you teach	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0	3.0	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	26.7	14.3	.	12.5
3: Satisfied (%)	43.3	76.2	100.0	75.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	26.7	9.5	.	12.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	3.3	.	.	.
Total (N)	30	21	11	8

K4d: Satisfaction with labs in which you teach	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	3.1	2.7	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	26.3	12.5	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	52.6	81.3	71.4	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	21.1	6.3	28.6	.
Total (N)	19	16	7	7

K4e: Satisfaction with maintenance of building in which you work	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.7	2.5	2.5	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	13.3	9.5	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	53.3	47.6	63.6	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	20.0	28.6	27.3	22.2
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	13.3	14.3	9.1	11.1
Total (N)	30	21	11	9

K4f: Satisfaction with infrastructure of bldgs in which you work	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.6	2.6	2.4	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	13.3	9.5	18.2	11.1
3: Satisfied (%)	46.7	52.4	9.1	44.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	23.3	23.8	63.6	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	16.7	14.3	9.1	11.1
Total (N)	30	21	11	9

K4g: Satisfaction with availability of up-to-date equipment	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9	2.6	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	20.0	14.3	9.1	.
3: Satisfied (%)	56.7	61.9	45.5	88.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	16.7	19.0	45.5	11.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.7	4.8	.	.
Total (N)	30	21	11	9

K4h: Satisfaction with availability of office supplies	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.7	2.8	2.3	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	16.7	25.0	.	11.1
3: Satisfied (%)	53.3	40.0	45.5	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	16.7	25.0	36.4	22.2
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	13.3	10.0	18.2	.
Total (N)	30	20	11	9

K4i: Satisfaction with availability of informal meeting space	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.5	2.7	2.5	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	20.0	9.5	9.1	12.5
3: Satisfied (%)	26.7	52.4	36.4	37.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	36.7	33.3	54.5	37.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	16.7	4.8	.	12.5
Total (N)	30	21	11	8

K4j: Satisfaction with dining options on campus	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.3	2.3	2.6	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	11.1	.	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	33.3	50.0	57.1	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	33.3	30.0	42.9	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	22.2	20.0	.	.
Total (N)	18	10	7	6

K4k: Satisfaction with availability of parking	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.6	2.5	2.7	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	3.4	4.8	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	62.1	57.1	81.8	77.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	20.7	19.0	9.1	11.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	13.8	19.0	9.1	11.1
Total (N)	29	21	11	9

K4l: Satisfaction with cost of parking	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.2	2.2	2.0	1.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	3.3	4.8	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	26.7	28.6	36.4	22.2
2: Dissatisfied (%)	53.3	47.6	27.3	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	16.7	19.0	36.4	44.4
Total (N)	30	21	11	9

K4m: Satisfaction with Wolfline	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	3.2	3.2	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	12.5	16.7	40.0	.
3: Satisfied (%)	62.5	83.3	40.0	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	12.5	.	20.0	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	12.5	.	.	.
Total (N)	8	6	5	1

K4n: Satisfaction with commute between Centennial and main	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.1	2.8	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	27.3	.	25.0
3: Satisfied (%)	63.6	77.8	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	22.2	25.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	9.1	.	.
Total (N)	11	9	4

K4o: Satisfaction with campus safety	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9	3.0	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	3.7	10.5	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	81.5	78.9	100.0	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	11.1	5.3	.	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	3.7	5.3	.	.
Total (N)	27	19	8	6

K4p: Satisfaction with campus aesthetics	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.6	2.8	2.8	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	3.4	5.0	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	65.5	75.0	90.0	62.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	20.7	10.0	.	37.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	10.3	10.0	10.0	.
Total (N)	29	20	10	8

K4q: Satisfaction with upkeep of campus grounds	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9	3.0	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.9	10.0	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	79.3	70.0	100.0	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	10.3	15.0	.	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	3.4	5.0	.	.
Total (N)	29	20	10	8

K4r: Satisfaction with amount of green space	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.4	2.8	2.8	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	3.7	15.0	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	48.1	55.0	80.0	87.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	37.0	25.0	20.0	12.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	11.1	5.0	.	.
Total (N)	27	20	10	8

K5a: Satisfaction with energy conservation	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.5	2.2	2.3	2.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	4.5	.	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	40.9	35.7	55.6	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	50.0	50.0	22.2	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	4.5	14.3	22.2	33.3
Total (N)	22	14	9	3

K5b: Satisfaction with water conservation	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.5	2.1	2.6	2.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	4.5	.	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	35.7	66.7	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	40.9	42.9	22.2	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	4.5	21.4	11.1	33.3
Total (N)	22	14	9	3

K5c: Satisfaction with recycling efforts	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	3.1	3.1	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	10.3	15.0	22.2	.
3: Satisfied (%)	65.5	75.0	66.7	57.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	20.7	10.0	11.1	42.9
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	3.4	.	.	.
Total (N)	29	20	9	7

K5d: Satisfaction with alternative transportation	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.4	2.4	2.6	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	.	12.5	.
3: Satisfied (%)	57.1	41.2	50.0	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	23.8	52.9	25.0	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	19.0	5.9	12.5	.
Total (N)	21	17	8	2

K5e: Satisfaction with green building practices	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.2	2.7	2.7	2.0
3: Satisfied (%)	47.1	66.7	66.7	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	23.5	33.3	33.3	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	29.4	.	.	50.0
Total (N)	17	9	6	2

K5f: Satisfaction with use of recycled-content resources	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.4	2.6	3.3	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	.	25.0	.
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	55.6	75.0	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	37.5	44.4	.	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	12.5	.	.	.
Total (N)	16	9	4	2

K6: Interest in hotel/conference center on Centennial Campus	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.7	2.8	2.8	2.1
4: A lot (%)	30.0	23.8	54.5	22.2
3: Some (%)	36.7	42.9	.	11.1
2: A little (%)	10.0	23.8	18.2	22.2
1: None at all (%)	23.3	9.5	27.3	44.4
Total (N)	30	21	11	9

K7: Likelihood of using conference center on Centennial Campus	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0	2.8	2.6
4: Very likely (%)	30.0	38.1	45.5	22.2
3: Somewhat likely (%)	36.7	33.3	18.2	33.3
2: Not very likely (%)	30.0	23.8	9.1	22.2
1: Not at all likely (%)	3.3	4.8	27.3	22.2
Total (N)	30	21	11	9

Section L: Recreation/Wellness

L1: Satisfaction with recreation activities on campus	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	3.0	2.7	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.9	20.0	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	69.0	60.0	72.7	88.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	17.2	20.0	27.3	11.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.9	.	.	.
Total (N)	29	20	11	9

L2: Satisfaction with cultural activities on campus	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9	2.6	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.9	5.0	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	79.3	75.0	63.6	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	6.9	20.0	36.4	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.9	.	.	.
Total (N)	29	20	11	9

L3a: Satisfaction with Carmichael Gymnasium	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9	2.6	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	25.0	13.3	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	43.8	66.7	62.5	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	25.0	13.3	37.5	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.3	6.7	.	.
Total (N)	16	15	8	3

L3b: Satisfaction with recreation space around campus	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.7	3.0	2.4	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	20.0	14.3	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	46.7	71.4	40.0	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	20.0	14.3	60.0	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	13.3	.	.	.
Total (N)	15	14	5	2

L3c: Satisfaction with organized Campus Recreation activities	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.4	2.9	2.7	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	14.3	.	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	42.9	85.7	66.7	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	14.3	14.3	33.3	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	28.6	.	.	.
Total (N)	7	7	3	1

L3d: Satisfaction with ARTS NC State programs	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9	2.5	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	12.5	9.1	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	62.5	72.7	50.0	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	25.0	18.2	50.0	.
Total (N)	16	11	2	3

L3e: Satisfaction with Wolfpack athletic events	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.3	3.1	3.3	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	25.0	9.1	25.0	33.3
3: Satisfied (%)	75.0	90.9	75.0	66.7
Total (N)	16	11	4	3

L4a: How often use Carmichael Gymnasium	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.5	3.3	1.8	2.2
Once a week or more (%)	16.7	23.8	.	.
A few times a month (%)	3.3	4.8	.	22.2
A few times a semester (%)	10.0	28.6	18.2	11.1
Once a semester (%)	10.0	4.8	9.1	.
Once a year (%)	3.3	.	9.1	.
Never (%)	56.7	38.1	63.6	66.7
Total (N)	30	21	11	9

L4b: How often use recreational space around campus	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.3	2.8	1.6	1.6
Once a week or more (%)	10.3	15.0	.	.
A few times a month (%)	3.4	.	.	.
A few times a semester (%)	17.2	25.0	9.1	11.1
Once a semester (%)	.	10.0	9.1	11.1
Once a year (%)	17.2	10.0	18.2	.
Never (%)	51.7	40.0	63.6	77.8
Total (N)	29	20	11	9

L4c: How often participate in organized Campus Recreation activities	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	1.4	1.9	1.2	1.2
Once a week or more (%)	3.3	5.0	.	.
A few times a month (%)	.	10.0	.	.
A few times a semester (%)	3.3	5.0	.	.
Once a semester (%)	.	.	.	11.1
Once a year (%)	10.0	5.0	18.2	.
Never (%)	83.3	75.0	81.8	88.9
Total (N)	30	20	11	9

L4d: How often attend ARTS NC State programs	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.4	2.3	1.2	2.1
A few times a month (%)	6.7	.	.	.
A few times a semester (%)	16.7	30.0	.	22.2
Once a semester (%)	26.7	10.0	.	11.1
Once a year (%)	10.0	20.0	18.2	22.2
Never (%)	40.0	40.0	81.8	44.4
Total (N)	30	20	11	9

L4e: How often attend Wolfpack athletic events	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.3	2.5	1.7	2.2
Once a week or more (%)	3.3	.	.	.
A few times a month (%)	6.7	14.3	.	11.1
A few times a semester (%)	13.3	19.0	9.1	11.1
Once a semester (%)	16.7	14.3	18.2	11.1
Once a year (%)	16.7	9.5	9.1	22.2
Never (%)	43.3	42.9	63.6	44.4
Total (N)	30	21	11	9

L5: Interest in designated faculty-only dining facility	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	1.6	1.6	1.7	1.9
4: A great deal (%)	6.7	9.5	9.1	11.1
3: Some (%)	16.7	9.5	9.1	22.2
2: A little (%)	6.7	9.5	27.3	11.1
1: None at all (%)	70.0	71.4	54.5	55.6
Total (N)	30	21	11	9

L6: Likelihood of using gym on Centennial campus	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	1.6	1.6	1.8	2.0
4: Very likely (%)	6.7	9.5	18.2	11.1
3: Somewhat likely (%)	13.3	9.5	.	11.1
2: Not very likely (%)	13.3	14.3	27.3	44.4
1: Not at all likely (%)	66.7	66.7	54.5	33.3
Total (N)	30	21	11	9

Section M: Work Activities

M1: Total hours per week spent performing job-related work (collapsed)	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track
Mean # Hrs Work	56.0	56.5	51.8	61.1
more than 60 hrs (%)	13.3	14.3	.	33.3
51 to 60 hrs (%)	56.7	52.4	36.4	55.6
41 to 50 hrs (%)	23.3	28.6	54.5	11.1
40 hrs or less (%)	6.7	4.8	9.1	.
Total (N)	30	21	11	9

M2A: Proportion of total hours spent on teaching/mentoring	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track
Mean % of Time on Activity	34.8	37.5	38.2	31.6
more than 50% of time (%)	6.7	19.0	18.2	22.2
26% to 50% of time (%)	66.7	52.4	45.5	11.1
11% to 25% of time (%)	16.7	23.8	36.4	44.4
6% to 10% of time (%)	10.0	4.8	.	22.2
Total (N)	30	21	11	9

M2a_1r: Includes teaching (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track
No (%)	6.7	4.8	27.3	22.2
Yes (%)	93.3	95.2	72.7	77.8
Total (N)	30	21	11	9

M2a_2r: Includes professional development to improve teaching (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track
No (%)	50.0	57.1	45.5	66.7
Yes (%)	50.0	42.9	54.5	33.3
Total (N)	30	21	11	9

M2a_3r: Includes research projects with students (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track
No (%)	33.3	33.3	27.3	66.7
Yes (%)	66.7	66.7	72.7	33.3
Total (N)	30	21	11	9

M2a_4r: Includes supervising internships/fiel