North Carolina State University
2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey:

Results for the College of Veterinary Medicine
by Race/Ethnicity 1

To skip directly to a particular section, select the section below.

Section B: Image and Vision	Section I: Post-Tenure Review
Section C: Leadership	Section J: Pay and Compensation
Section D: Faculty-Administration Relationships	Section K: Campus Infrastructure/Physical Environment
Section E: Diversity/Multiculturalism	Section L: Recreation/Wellness
Section F: Working Relationships	Section M: Work Activities
Section G: Faculty Support & Professional Development	Section N: Conclusions/Overall Satisfaction
Section H: Performance Review, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure

To download a Microsoft Word version of this document, click here.

A2: Ever held an administrative position	White	Faculty of Color
..... No (%)	79.1	75.0
..... Yes (%)	20.9	25.0
Total (N)	67	8

Section B: Image and Vision

B1a: Department doing good job of recruiting faculty	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	32.8	14.3
3: Agree (%)	47.8	42.9
2: Disagree (%)	17.9	42.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.5	.
Total (N)	67	7

B1b: Department creating culture where faculty can develop to full potential	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.4	14.3
3: Agree (%)	55.2	28.6
2: Disagree (%)	17.9	42.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.5	14.3
Total (N)	67	7

B1c: Department retaining most effective and productive faculty	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	7.6	12.5
3: Agree (%)	51.5	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	34.8	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.1	37.5
Total (N)	66	8

B2a: Department national reputation for undergraduate educ	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	4.1	4.5
5: Very strong (%)	27.3	50.0
4: Strong (%)	54.5	50.0
3: Average (%)	18.2	.
Total (N)	11	2

B2b: Department national reputation for graduate education	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.7	3.0
5: Very strong (%)	23.4	14.3
4: Strong (%)	32.8	14.3
3: Average (%)	31.3	28.6
2: Weak (%)	12.5	42.9
Total (N)	64	7

B2c: Department national reputation for research & scholarly activity	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	4.1	3.6
5: Very strong (%)	31.8	.
4: Strong (%)	47.0	62.5
3: Average (%)	21.2	37.5
Total (N)	66	8

B2d: Department national reputation for creative artistry and literature	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0
5: Very strong (%)	9.1	.
4: Strong (%)	27.3	.
3: Average (%)	36.4	100.0
2: Weak (%)	9.1	.
1: Very weak (%)	18.2	.
Total (N)	11	2

B2e: Department national reputation for tech & managerial innovation	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.4	3.3
5: Very strong (%)	6.3	.
4: Strong (%)	46.9	50.0
3: Average (%)	34.4	25.0
2: Weak (%)	6.3	25.0
1: Very weak (%)	6.3	.
Total (N)	32	4

B2f: Department national reputation for extension & engagement	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.9	3.2
5: Very strong (%)	25.5	16.7
4: Strong (%)	43.6	16.7
3: Average (%)	25.5	50.0
2: Weak (%)	3.6	.
1: Very weak (%)	1.8	16.7
Total (N)	55	6

B2g: Department national reputation for contrib to econ Development	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	3.0
5: Very strong (%)	4.5	20.0
4: Strong (%)	36.4	.
3: Average (%)	50.0	60.0
2: Weak (%)	6.8	.
1: Very weak (%)	2.3	20.0
Total (N)	44	5

B3a: Grade undergraduate majors' ability to meet prog demands	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.9	4.0
A (%)	14.3	.
B (%)	64.3	100.0
C (%)	14.3	.
D (%)	7.1	.
Total (N)	14	1

B3b: Grade graduate student ability to meet prog demands	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	4.1	3.8
A (%)	26.9	.
B (%)	58.2	87.5
C (%)	13.4	.
D (%)	.	12.5
F (%)	1.5	.
Total (N)	67	8

B3c: Grade demonstrated professional ability of faculty	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	4.6	4.4
A (%)	61.2	50.0
B (%)	38.8	37.5
C (%)	.	12.5
Total (N)	67	8

B3d: Grade professional achievement of faculty	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	4.6	4.6
A (%)	62.7	62.5
B (%)	35.8	37.5
C (%)	1.5	.
Total (N)	67	8

B3e: Grade own demonstrated professional ability	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	4.4	4.4
A (%)	52.2	37.5
B (%)	40.3	62.5
C (%)	7.5	.
Total (N)	67	8

B3f: Grade own professional achievement	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	4.3	4.5
A (%)	43.3	50.0
B (%)	47.8	50.0
C (%)	9.0	.
Total (N)	67	8

B4: Department's vision for the future	White	Faculty of Color
Clear vision; actively working toward goals (%)	44.8	50.0
Vision with slow progress (%)	32.8	25.0
No clear vision (%)	16.4	12.5
Not familiar (%)	6.0	12.5
Total (N)	67	8

B5: Agreement with department vision for future	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	40.4	16.7
3: Agree (%)	50.0	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	7.7	16.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.9	.
Total (N)	52	6

B6: College's vision for the future	White	Faculty of Color
Clear vision; actively working toward goals (%)	43.3	50.0
Vision with slow progress (%)	40.3	25.0
No clear vision (%)	10.4	.
Not familiar (%)	6.0	25.0
Total (N)	67	8

B7a: Department change in next five years	White	Faculty of Color
Change for the better (%)	56.7	50.0
Change for the worse (%)	11.9	12.5
Not really change (%)	31.3	37.5
Total (N)	67	8

B7b: College change in next five years	White	Faculty of Color
Change for the better (%)	56.1	62.5
Change for the worse (%)	15.2	.
Not really change (%)	28.8	37.5
Total (N)	66	8

B7c: NC State change in next five years	White	Faculty of Color
Change for the better (%)	43.3	37.5
Change for the worse (%)	6.0	.
Not really change (%)	50.7	62.5
Total (N)	67	8

Section C: Leadership

C1a: Dept admin communication with faculty	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.4	3.6
4: Excellent (%)	54.7	62.5
3: Good (%)	35.9	37.5
2: Fair (%)	7.8	.
1: Poor (%)	1.6	.
Total (N)	64	8

C1b: Dept admin seek faculty input for dept vision	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	3.1
4: Excellent (%)	46.8	62.5
3: Good (%)	33.9	12.5
2: Fair (%)	16.1	.
1: Poor (%)	3.2	25.0
Total (N)	62	8

C1c: Dept admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	42.9	50.0
3: Good (%)	33.3	25.0
2: Fair (%)	20.6	.
1: Poor (%)	3.2	25.0
Total (N)	63	8

C1d: Dept admin delegate dept responsibility to faculty	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	38.3	25.0
3: Good (%)	46.7	50.0
2: Fair (%)	10.0	25.0
1: Poor (%)	5.0	.
Total (N)	60	8

C1e: Dept admin grant faculty autonomy	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	3.3
4: Excellent (%)	57.8	37.5
3: Good (%)	34.4	50.0
2: Fair (%)	4.7	12.5
1: Poor (%)	3.1	.
Total (N)	64	8

C1f: Dept admin set clear and explicit priorities	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	29.0	25.0
3: Good (%)	46.8	37.5
2: Fair (%)	22.6	25.0
1: Poor (%)	1.6	12.5
Total (N)	62	8

C1g: Dept admin appreciate your contrib to mission	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	3.3
4: Excellent (%)	51.6	37.5
3: Good (%)	29.7	50.0
2: Fair (%)	15.6	12.5
1: Poor (%)	3.1	.
Total (N)	64	8

C1h: Dept admin conflict resolution	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	2.4
4: Excellent (%)	29.8	.
3: Good (%)	43.9	50.0
2: Fair (%)	15.8	37.5
1: Poor (%)	10.5	12.5
Total (N)	57	8

C1i: Dept admin provide necessary resources	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	28.1	37.5
3: Good (%)	40.6	37.5
2: Fair (%)	21.9	12.5
1: Poor (%)	9.4	12.5
Total (N)	64	8

C1j: Dept admin allocate resources fairly	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	40.3	37.5
3: Good (%)	38.7	25.0
2: Fair (%)	16.1	12.5
1: Poor (%)	4.8	25.0
Total (N)	62	8

C1k: Dept admin serve as advocate for dept to college	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.4	3.1
4: Excellent (%)	54.8	42.9
3: Good (%)	32.3	42.9
2: Fair (%)	11.3	.
1: Poor (%)	1.6	14.3
Total (N)	62	7

C1l: Dept admin support academic freedom	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	3.4
4: Excellent (%)	59.0	57.1
3: Good (%)	34.4	28.6
2: Fair (%)	6.6	14.3
Total (N)	61	7

C1m: Dept admin make rational decisions	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.4	3.1
4: Excellent (%)	49.2	37.5
3: Good (%)	42.9	37.5
2: Fair (%)	6.3	25.0
1: Poor (%)	1.6	.
Total (N)	63	8

C1n: Dept admin make equitable decisions	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.4	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	48.3	50.0
3: Good (%)	40.0	12.5
2: Fair (%)	11.7	25.0
1: Poor (%)	.	12.5
Total (N)	60	8

C1o: Dept admin promote diversity within dept	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	33.3	28.6
3: Good (%)	38.9	42.9
2: Fair (%)	24.1	14.3
1: Poor (%)	3.7	14.3
Total (N)	54	7

C2a: College admin communication with faculty	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.4
4: Excellent (%)	12.1	12.5
3: Good (%)	45.5	37.5
2: Fair (%)	31.8	25.0
1: Poor (%)	10.6	25.0
Total (N)	66	8

C2b: College admin seek faculty input for vision	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	2.0
4: Excellent (%)	11.1	.
3: Good (%)	33.3	50.0
2: Fair (%)	38.1	.
1: Poor (%)	17.5	50.0
Total (N)	63	8

C2c: College admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.3	1.9
4: Excellent (%)	5.1	.
3: Good (%)	37.3	37.5
2: Fair (%)	37.3	12.5
1: Poor (%)	20.3	50.0
Total (N)	59	8

C2d: College admin grant departmental autonomy	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	25.0	.
3: Good (%)	51.8	57.1
2: Fair (%)	17.9	42.9
1: Poor (%)	5.4	.
Total (N)	56	7

C2e: College admin set clear and explicit priorities	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.4
4: Excellent (%)	15.9	.
3: Good (%)	50.8	57.1
2: Fair (%)	25.4	28.6
1: Poor (%)	7.9	14.3
Total (N)	63	7

C2f: College admin appreciate your contrib to mission	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	14.8	14.3
3: Good (%)	44.3	42.9
2: Fair (%)	32.8	28.6
1: Poor (%)	8.2	14.3
Total (N)	61	7

C2g: College admin conflict resolution	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	1.6
4: Excellent (%)	3.9	.
3: Good (%)	47.1	14.3
2: Fair (%)	35.3	28.6
1: Poor (%)	13.7	57.1
Total (N)	51	7

C2h: College admin provide necessary resources	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	9.1	12.5
3: Good (%)	54.5	37.5
2: Fair (%)	21.2	50.0
1: Poor (%)	15.2	.
Total (N)	66	8

C2i: College admin allocate resources fairly	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.1
4: Excellent (%)	12.9	.
3: Good (%)	51.6	42.9
2: Fair (%)	22.6	28.6
1: Poor (%)	12.9	28.6
Total (N)	62	7

C2j: College admin serve as advocate for college to univ	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.7
4: Excellent (%)	37.0	66.7
3: Good (%)	40.7	33.3
2: Fair (%)	16.7	.
1: Poor (%)	5.6	.
Total (N)	54	6

C2k: College admin support academic freedom	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	37.3	28.6
3: Good (%)	50.8	42.9
2: Fair (%)	5.1	28.6
1: Poor (%)	6.8	.
Total (N)	59	7

C2l: College admin make rational decisions	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	22.4	.
3: Good (%)	44.8	75.0
2: Fair (%)	27.6	12.5
1: Poor (%)	5.2	12.5
Total (N)	58	8

C2m: College admin make equitable decisions	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.0
4: Excellent (%)	17.2	.
3: Good (%)	44.8	42.9
2: Fair (%)	29.3	14.3
1: Poor (%)	8.6	42.9
Total (N)	58	7

C2n: College admin promote diversity within college	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	24.1	14.3
3: Good (%)	50.0	42.9
2: Fair (%)	20.7	28.6
1: Poor (%)	5.2	14.3
Total (N)	58	7

C3a: Univ admin communication with faculty	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.2	1.9
4: Excellent (%)	3.4	.
3: Good (%)	39.0	28.6
2: Fair (%)	35.6	28.6
1: Poor (%)	22.0	42.9
Total (N)	59	7

C3b: Univ admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.2	2.0
4: Excellent (%)	5.1	.
3: Good (%)	33.3	33.3
2: Fair (%)	41.0	33.3
1: Poor (%)	20.5	33.3
Total (N)	39	6

C3c: Univ admin set clear and explicit priorities	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.2
4: Excellent (%)	8.0	16.7
3: Good (%)	46.0	16.7
2: Fair (%)	38.0	33.3
1: Poor (%)	8.0	33.3
Total (N)	50	6

C3d: Univ admin serves as advocate for univ to constituents	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	17.8	40.0
3: Good (%)	57.8	40.0
2: Fair (%)	17.8	.
1: Poor (%)	6.7	20.0
Total (N)	45	5

C3e: Univ admin support academic freedom	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	21.6	14.3
3: Good (%)	64.7	57.1
2: Fair (%)	7.8	14.3
1: Poor (%)	5.9	14.3
Total (N)	51	7

C3f: Univ admin make rational decisions	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.2
4: Excellent (%)	10.0	.
3: Good (%)	60.0	50.0
2: Fair (%)	25.0	16.7
1: Poor (%)	5.0	33.3
Total (N)	40	6

C3g: Univ admin make equitable decisions	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.0
4: Excellent (%)	9.8	.
3: Good (%)	53.7	33.3
2: Fair (%)	26.8	33.3
1: Poor (%)	9.8	33.3
Total (N)	41	6

C3h: Univ admin promote diversity within university	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	19.6	20.0
3: Good (%)	56.5	40.0
2: Fair (%)	17.4	20.0
1: Poor (%)	6.5	20.0
Total (N)	46	5

Section D: Faculty-Administration Relationships

D1a: I am encouraged to give input on curricular issues	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	39.4	37.5
3: Agree (%)	47.0	62.5
2: Disagree (%)	10.6	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.0	.
Total (N)	66	8

D1b: I am encouraged to give input on prog assessment	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	29.2	25.0
3: Agree (%)	49.2	62.5
2: Disagree (%)	18.5	12.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.1	.
Total (N)	65	8

D1c: I am encouraged to give input on dept hiring	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	39.4	25.0
3: Agree (%)	48.5	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	7.6	12.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.5	12.5
Total (N)	66	8

D1d: I am encouraged to give input on college admin appointments	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	18.2	.
3: Agree (%)	45.5	62.5
2: Disagree (%)	27.3	12.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.1	25.0
Total (N)	66	8

D1e: I am encouraged to give input on university admin appointments	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	2.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	9.2	.
3: Agree (%)	32.3	37.5
2: Disagree (%)	49.2	37.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.2	25.0
Total (N)	65	8

D2: Familiarity with academic program assessment in dept	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0
4: Very familiar (%)	28.4	25.0
3: Somewhat familiar (%)	35.8	50.0
2: Not very familiar (%)	31.3	25.0
1: Not at all familiar (%)	4.5	.
Total (N)	67	8

D3a: Understanding of resource allocation to university	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.2	2.5
4: Very well (%)	6.0	12.5
3: Fairly well (%)	25.4	25.0
2: Not very well (%)	50.7	62.5
1: Not at all (%)	17.9	.
Total (N)	67	8

D3b: Understanding of resource allocation to college	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.3	2.6
4: Very well (%)	3.0	12.5
3: Fairly well (%)	35.8	37.5
2: Not very well (%)	49.3	50.0
1: Not at all (%)	11.9	.
Total (N)	67	8

D3c: Understanding of resource allocation to department	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8
4: Very well (%)	23.9	25.0
3: Fairly well (%)	35.8	25.0
2: Not very well (%)	35.8	50.0
1: Not at all (%)	4.5	.
Total (N)	67	8

D3d: Understanding of resource allocation within department	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	3.4
4: Very well (%)	50.0	50.0
3: Fairly well (%)	30.3	37.5
2: Not very well (%)	18.2	12.5
1: Not at all (%)	1.5	.
Total (N)	66	8

D4: Faculty have sufficient input on dept resource allocation	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	22.7	25.0
3: Agree (%)	56.1	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	19.7	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.5	.
Total (N)	66	8

D5: Dept faculty searches/appointments are collegial and inclusive	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.4	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	48.5	25.0
3: Agree (%)	43.9	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	3.0	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.5	.
Total (N)	66	8

D6a: Relations between faculty in dept and dept admin	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	3.3
4: Excellent (%)	60.0	25.0
3: Good (%)	33.8	75.0
2: Fair (%)	4.6	.
1: Poor (%)	1.5	.
Total (N)	65	8

D6b: Relations between faculty in dept and college admin	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	2.5
4: Excellent (%)	23.1	.
3: Good (%)	53.8	62.5
2: Fair (%)	15.4	25.0
1: Poor (%)	7.7	12.5
Total (N)	65	8

D6c: Relations between faculty in dept and univ admin	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.3	2.0
4: Excellent (%)	4.7	.
3: Good (%)	37.2	50.0
2: Fair (%)	39.5	.
1: Poor (%)	18.6	50.0
Total (N)	43	4

D6d: Relations between all faculty and univ admin	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.3	2.2
3: Good (%)	42.9	50.0
2: Fair (%)	42.9	16.7
1: Poor (%)	14.3	33.3
Total (N)	35	6

D7a: Faculty Senate effective commun between faculty and univ admin	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.3	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	4.7	16.7
3: Agree (%)	34.9	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	41.9	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	18.6	16.7
Total (N)	43	6

D7b: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty in general	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.3	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	5.0	.
3: Agree (%)	40.0	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	32.5	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	22.5	33.3
Total (N)	40	6

D7c: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty like me	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.1	2.0
3: Agree (%)	26.3	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	52.6	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	21.1	33.3
Total (N)	38	6

D8: Effectiveness of university grievance procedures	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.3
4: Very effective (%)	21.4	16.7
3: Somewhat effective (%)	35.7	33.3
2: Not very effective (%)	25.0	16.7
1: Not at all effective (%)	17.9	33.3
Total (N)	28	6

D9: Importance of "ombuds" for informal conflict resolution	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	3.4
4: Very important (%)	60.6	37.5
3: Somewhat important (%)	33.3	62.5
2: Not very important (%)	6.1	.
Total (N)	66	8

Section E: Diversity/Multiculturalism

E1: Importance of institutional emphasis on diversity/Multiculturalism	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.4	3.6
4: Very important (%)	49.2	75.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	44.6	12.5
2: Not very important (%)	6.2	12.5
Total (N)	65	8

E2: Importance of diversity to enhanced learning in own classroom	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	3.6
4: Very important (%)	17.5	75.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	44.4	12.5
2: Not very important (%)	34.9	12.5
1: Not at all important (%)	3.2	.
Total (N)	63	8

E3: NCSU prepares students to live and work in diverse society	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.6	16.7
3: Agree (%)	61.7	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	19.1	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.5	16.7
Total (N)	47	6

E4a: My dept recruits historically underrepresented students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	23.2	25.0
3: Agree (%)	55.4	25.0
2: Disagree (%)	17.9	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.6	.
Total (N)	56	4

E4b: My dept retains historically underrepresented students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	18.5	25.0
3: Agree (%)	66.7	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	11.1	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.7	.
Total (N)	54	4

E4c: My dept supports historically underrepresented students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	19.6	20.0
3: Agree (%)	64.7	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	9.8	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.9	20.0
Total (N)	51	5

E4d: My dept recruits historically underrepresented faculty	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	2.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	20.8	.
3: Agree (%)	50.0	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	22.9	40.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.3	20.0
Total (N)	48	5

E4e: My dept retains historically underrepresented faculty	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	22.4	.
3: Agree (%)	49.0	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	20.4	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.2	40.0
Total (N)	49	5

E4f: My dept supports historically underrepresented faculty	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	2.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	19.1	.
3: Agree (%)	55.3	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	17.0	40.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.5	20.0
Total (N)	47	5

E5a: Dept environ accepting/respectful of age	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.6	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	58.3	37.5
3: Agree (%)	38.3	62.5
2: Disagree (%)	3.3	.
Total (N)	60	8

E5b: Dept environ accepting/respectful of disability status	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	55.3	42.9
3: Agree (%)	40.4	57.1
2: Disagree (%)	2.1	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.1	.
Total (N)	47	7

E5c: Dept environ accepting/respectful of gender	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	58.7	37.5
3: Agree (%)	36.5	62.5
2: Disagree (%)	4.8	.
Total (N)	63	8

E5d: Dept environ accepting/respectful of military status	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	3.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	56.0	75.0
3: Agree (%)	42.0	25.0
2: Disagree (%)	2.0	.
Total (N)	50	4

E5e: Dept environ accepting/respectful of nationality/ethnic origin	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	60.7	42.9
3: Agree (%)	36.1	57.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.3	.
Total (N)	61	7

E5f: Dept environ accepting/respectful of race and color	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	55.0	42.9
3: Agree (%)	38.3	57.1
2: Disagree (%)	3.3	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.3	.
Total (N)	60	7

E5g: Dept environ accepting/respectful of religion	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	56.6	37.5
3: Agree (%)	39.6	62.5
2: Disagree (%)	1.9	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.9	.
Total (N)	53	8

E5h: Dept environ accepting/respectful of sexual orientation	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	56.9	50.0
3: Agree (%)	39.2	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	2.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.0	.
Total (N)	51	6

E6a: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of age	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.7	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	69.8	33.3
3: Agree (%)	27.0	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	3.2	.
Total (N)	63	6

E6b: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of disability status	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.7	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	68.5	33.3
3: Agree (%)	29.6	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	1.9	.
Total (N)	54	6

E6c: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of gender	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.7	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	68.8	33.3
3: Agree (%)	28.1	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	3.1	.
Total (N)	64	6

E6d: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of military status	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.7	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	67.9	40.0
3: Agree (%)	30.4	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	1.8	.
Total (N)	56	5

E6e: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of national/ethnic origin	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.6	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	69.4	33.3
3: Agree (%)	27.4	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	1.6	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.6	.
Total (N)	62	6

E6f: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of race and color	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.6	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	64.5	33.3
3: Agree (%)	30.6	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	3.2	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.6	.
Total (N)	62	6

E6g: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of religion	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.6	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	67.8	33.3
3: Agree (%)	28.8	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	1.7	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.7	.
Total (N)	59	6

E6h: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of sexual orientation	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.6	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	66.1	33.3
3: Agree (%)	30.4	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	1.8	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.8	.
Total (N)	56	6

E7: Faculty diversity/multiculturalism enhancement of intellectual diversity in dept	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	3.3
4: A great deal (%)	9.7	42.9
3: Some (%)	50.0	42.9
2: A little (%)	30.6	14.3
1: Not at all (%)	9.7	.
Total (N)	62	7

E8: Inclusion of diversity-related topics, scholarship, etc in your courses	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	1.5	2.9
4: A great deal (%)	1.6	37.5
3: Some (%)	12.9	37.5
2: A little (%)	17.7	.
1: Not at all (%)	67.7	25.0
Total (N)	62	8

E9a: Interest in research, extension, art endeavors outside U.S.	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0
4: A great deal (%)	38.5	37.5
3: Some (%)	29.2	37.5
2: A little (%)	15.4	12.5
1: None (%)	16.9	12.5
Total (N)	65	8

E9b: Interest in teaching study abroad	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.1
4: A great deal (%)	21.5	12.5
3: Some (%)	30.8	37.5
2: A little (%)	20.0	.
1: None (%)	27.7	50.0
Total (N)	65	8

E9c: Interest in participating in spring break service learning	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	1.8	1.6
4: A great deal (%)	6.3	.
3: Some (%)	18.8	28.6
2: A little (%)	21.9	.
1: None (%)	53.1	71.4
Total (N)	64	7

E9d: Interest in participating in international service projects	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.3
4: A great deal (%)	20.6	12.5
3: Some (%)	34.9	37.5
2: A little (%)	25.4	12.5
1: None (%)	19.0	37.5
Total (N)	63	8

E9e: Interest in teaching in international studies major	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	1.6	2.1
4: A great deal (%)	4.7	12.5
3: Some (%)	15.6	25.0
2: A little (%)	18.8	25.0
1: None (%)	60.9	37.5
Total (N)	64	8

E9f: Interest in advising international students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.2	3.1
4: A great deal (%)	17.2	37.5
3: Some (%)	21.9	50.0
2: A little (%)	25.0	.
1: None (%)	35.9	12.5
Total (N)	64	8

Section F: Working Relationships

F1: There is unity/cohesion among faculty in my department	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	36.9	12.5
3: Agree (%)	41.5	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	18.5	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.1	12.5
Total (N)	65	8

F2a: Good communication between my students and me	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	37.5	25.0
3: Agree (%)	57.8	75.0
2: Disagree (%)	3.1	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.6	.
Total (N)	64	8

F2b: Good communication between dept and our students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	21.7	.
3: Agree (%)	65.0	83.3
2: Disagree (%)	10.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.3	16.7
Total (N)	60	6

F2c: Good communication between faculty in my dept	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	32.3	12.5
3: Agree (%)	53.8	62.5
2: Disagree (%)	12.3	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.5	.
Total (N)	65	8

F2d: Good communication between my dept and other depts	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	12.9	.
3: Agree (%)	61.3	75.0
2: Disagree (%)	22.6	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.2	.
Total (N)	62	8

F2e: Good communication between my college and other colleges	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	4.8	.
3: Agree (%)	54.8	57.1
2: Disagree (%)	21.4	28.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	19.0	14.3
Total (N)	42	7

F3: Dept environ promotes respectful dialogue between diverse perspectives	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.4	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	49.2	25.0
3: Agree (%)	43.1	37.5
2: Disagree (%)	3.1	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.6	12.5
Total (N)	65	8

F4a: Frequency given/recvd teaching advice in dept past few years	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0
Frequently (%)	30.8	25.0
Sometimes (%)	46.2	62.5
Seldom (%)	15.4	.
Never (%)	7.7	12.5
Total (N)	65	8

F4b: Frequency given/recvd research/artistic feedback in dept past few yrs	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	3.3
Frequently (%)	52.3	37.5
Sometimes (%)	33.8	50.0
Seldom (%)	9.2	12.5
Never (%)	4.6	.
Total (N)	65	8

F4c: Frequency given/recvd help with dept/college bureaucracy past few yrs	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.3
Frequently (%)	35.4	37.5
Sometimes (%)	38.5	50.0
Seldom (%)	23.1	12.5
Never (%)	3.1	.
Total (N)	65	8

F4d: Frequency given/recvd help undrsnd reappointment, promotion, tenure past few yrs	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.4
Frequently (%)	32.3	37.5
Sometimes (%)	50.8	62.5
Seldom (%)	13.8	.
Never (%)	3.1	.
Total (N)	65	8

F4e: Frequency given/recvd help with work/personal balance issues past few yrs	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.4
Frequently (%)	13.8	25.0
Sometimes (%)	30.8	25.0
Seldom (%)	43.1	12.5
Never (%)	12.3	37.5
Total (N)	65	8

F5a: Frequency of collab with faculty in your dept	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.6	3.8
Frequently (%)	69.2	75.0
Sometimes (%)	26.2	25.0
Seldom (%)	4.6	.
Total (N)	65	8

F5b: Frequency of collab with faculty in other NCSU depts	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.5
Frequently (%)	38.5	50.0
Sometimes (%)	38.5	50.0
Seldom (%)	13.8	.
Never (%)	9.2	.
Total (N)	65	8

F5c: Frequency of collab with faculty from other universities	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.5
Frequently (%)	32.3	50.0
Sometimes (%)	41.5	50.0
Seldom (%)	18.5	.
Never (%)	7.7	.
Total (N)	65	8

F5d: Frequency of collab with non-faculty external to NCSU	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.5
Frequently (%)	23.1	12.5
Sometimes (%)	38.5	50.0
Seldom (%)	18.5	12.5
Never (%)	20.0	25.0
Total (N)	65	8

Section G: Faculty Support & Professional Development

G1a: Satisfaction with level of courses	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	3.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	50.0	50.0
3: Satisfied (%)	46.7	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	3.3	.
Total (N)	60	8

G1b: Satisfaction with number of courses	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.4	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	41.0	25.0
3: Satisfied (%)	54.1	62.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	4.9	12.5
Total (N)	61	8

G1c: Satisfaction with choice in courses	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	3.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	40.3	37.5
3: Satisfied (%)	53.2	62.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	4.8	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	1.6	.
Total (N)	62	8

G1d: Satisfaction with course content discretion	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.6	3.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	67.7	37.5
3: Satisfied (%)	29.0	62.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	3.2	.
Total (N)	62	8

G1e: Satisfaction with number of students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	37.1	37.5
3: Satisfied (%)	58.1	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	4.8	12.5
Total (N)	62	8

G1f: Satisfaction with quality of undergraduates	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	23.5	33.3
3: Satisfied (%)	52.9	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	23.5	33.3
Total (N)	17	3

G1g: Satisfaction with quality of graduate students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	16.4	25.0
3: Satisfied (%)	73.8	25.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	9.8	50.0
Total (N)	61	8

G1h: Satisfaction with access to grad TAs	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.0	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	25.0
3: Satisfied (%)	34.8	25.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	34.8	25.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	30.4	25.0
Total (N)	23	4

G1i: Satisfaction with access to grad RAs	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.0	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	3.3	14.3
3: Satisfied (%)	26.7	42.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	36.7	28.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	33.3	14.3
Total (N)	30	7

G2a: NCSU supports innovative teaching	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	34.4	50.0
3: Agree (%)	54.1	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	6.6	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.9	.
Total (N)	61	6

G2b: NCSU supports innovative research and scholarly activity	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	40.3	37.5
3: Agree (%)	51.6	25.0
2: Disagree (%)	6.5	37.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.6	.
Total (N)	62	8

G2c: NCSU supports innovative creative artistry and literature	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	4.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	18.2	100.0
3: Agree (%)	63.6	.
2: Disagree (%)	9.1	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.1	.
Total (N)	11	1

G2d: NCSU supports innovative extension/engagement/econ dev activity	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	32.6	40.0
3: Agree (%)	56.5	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	8.7	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.2	.
Total (N)	46	5

G3a: NCSU rewards innovative teaching	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	21.3	12.5
3: Agree (%)	44.3	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	27.9	37.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.6	.
Total (N)	61	8

G3b: NCSU rewards innovative research and scholarly activity	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	44.4	50.0
3: Agree (%)	41.3	37.5
2: Disagree (%)	12.7	12.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.6	.
Total (N)	63	8

G3c: NCSU rewards innovative creative artistry and literature	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	4.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	100.0
3: Agree (%)	87.5	.
2: Disagree (%)	12.5	.
Total (N)	8	1

G3d: NCSU rewards innovative extension/engagement/econ dev activity	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	15.4	20.0
3: Agree (%)	64.1	80.0
2: Disagree (%)	17.9	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.6	.
Total (N)	39	5

G4a: Satisfaction: Availability of classroom technology	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	21.7	12.5
3: Satisfied (%)	58.3	62.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	16.7	25.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	3.3	.
Total (N)	60	8

G4b: Satisfaction: Teaching reduction for scholarly/prof growth	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	11.6	14.3
3: Satisfied (%)	44.2	42.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	25.6	42.9
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	18.6	.
Total (N)	43	7

G4c: Satisfaction: Teaching workshop/seminar opportunities	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	10.5	14.3
3: Satisfied (%)	77.2	57.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	12.3	14.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	14.3
Total (N)	57	7

G4d: Satisfaction: Avail of funds to attend teaching conference/wrkshp	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	9.3	25.0
3: Satisfied (%)	44.2	12.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	32.6	25.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	14.0	37.5
Total (N)	43	8

G4e: Satisfaction: Learning technology training/support	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	7.7	28.6
3: Satisfied (%)	63.5	42.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	26.9	14.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	1.9	14.3
Total (N)	52	7

G4f: Satisfaction: Campus bookstore meeting course needs	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	22.2	20.0
3: Satisfied (%)	66.7	40.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	20.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	11.1	20.0
Total (N)	18	5

G4g: Satisfaction: Availability of funds to present work	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.8	12.5
3: Satisfied (%)	45.8	37.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	35.6	25.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	11.9	25.0
Total (N)	59	8

G4h: Satisfaction: Opportunities for scholarly/professional leave	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	14.0	.
3: Satisfied (%)	54.0	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	18.0	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	14.0	.
Total (N)	50	6

G4i: Satisfaction: Financial support for scholarly/professional leave	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	13.0	14.3
3: Satisfied (%)	37.0	28.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	30.4	57.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	19.6	.
Total (N)	46	7

G4j: Satisfaction: Leadership development opportunities	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	5.7	33.3
3: Satisfied (%)	62.9	16.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	22.9	50.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	8.6	.
Total (N)	35	6

G4k: Satisfaction: Support for dept assessment activities	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	10.0	33.3
3: Satisfied (%)	57.5	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	22.5	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	10.0	16.7
Total (N)	40	6

G4l: Satisfaction: Availability of/access to materials via NCSU Libraries	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	28.6	33.3
3: Satisfied (%)	57.1	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	11.1	16.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	3.2	.
Total (N)	63	6

G4m: Satisfaction: Support with dealing with student concerns	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	16.0	16.7
3: Satisfied (%)	70.0	83.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	10.0	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	4.0	.
Total (N)	50	6

G4n: Satisfaction: Support for technology transfer	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.8	16.7
3: Satisfied (%)	63.6	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	13.6	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	15.9	16.7
Total (N)	44	6

G5: Assignment of formal mentor	White	Faculty of Color
Yes (%)	26.6	62.5
No (%)	73.4	37.5
Total (N)	64	8

G6: Mentor helpfulness	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	3.0
4: Very helpful (%)	58.8	20.0
3: Somewhat helpful (%)	11.8	60.0
2: Not very helpful (%)	17.6	20.0
1: Not at all helpful (%)	11.8	.
Total (N)	17	5

G7a: Satisfaction: Pre-award support from college for grant/contract	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	2.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	16.0	14.3
3: Satisfied (%)	62.0	42.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	20.0	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.0	42.9
Total (N)	50	7

G7b: Satisfaction: Post-award support from college for grant/contract	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	10.6	14.3
3: Satisfied (%)	63.8	42.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	23.4	28.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.1	14.3
Total (N)	47	7

G7c: Satisfaction: Pre-award University support for grant/contract	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	4.5	.
3: Satisfied (%)	54.5	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	29.5	16.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	11.4	16.7
Total (N)	44	6

G7d: Satisfaction: Post-award University support for grant/contract	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	4.7	.
3: Satisfied (%)	48.8	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	27.9	16.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	18.6	16.7
Total (N)	43	6

G7e: Satisfaction: Allocation of indirect grant costs to investigator	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.3	2.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	2.0	.
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	20.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	28.0	80.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	20.0	.
Total (N)	50	5

G7f: Satisfaction: Allocation of indirect grant costs to department	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.3	2.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	4.3	.
3: Satisfied (%)	34.8	20.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	43.5	80.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	17.4	.
Total (N)	46	5

G7g: Satisfaction: PI control over indirect cost allocation	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.2	1.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	2.1	.
3: Satisfied (%)	39.6	12.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	35.4	50.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	22.9	37.5
Total (N)	48	8

Section H: Performance Review, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure

H1: Faculty performance review standards are clearly stated	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.4	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	58.1	25.0
3: Agree (%)	30.6	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	6.5	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.8	.
Total (N)	62	8

H2: Faculty performance review procedures are clearly stated	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.4	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	56.5	25.0
3: Agree (%)	35.5	62.5
2: Disagree (%)	3.2	12.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.8	.
Total (N)	62	8

H3: SME is consistent with departmental vision	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.4	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	40.0	28.6
3: Agree (%)	56.7	57.1
2: Disagree (%)	1.7	14.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.7	.
Total (N)	60	7

H4: SME is consistent with departmental promotion standards	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.4	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	48.3	28.6
3: Agree (%)	44.8	57.1
2: Disagree (%)	5.2	14.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.7	.
Total (N)	58	7

H5a: Performance Review feedback appropriately based on SME	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	42.4	42.9
3: Agree (%)	49.2	42.9
2: Disagree (%)	6.8	14.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.7	.
Total (N)	59	7

H5b: Performance Review feedback helpful for professional Development	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	28.8	25.0
3: Agree (%)	54.2	62.5
2: Disagree (%)	13.6	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.4	12.5
Total (N)	59	8

H5c: Performance Review feedback corresponds with my perceptions of own performance	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	44.3	12.5
3: Agree (%)	44.3	75.0
2: Disagree (%)	6.6	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.9	12.5
Total (N)	61	8

H5d: Performance Review feedback helps understand relation to other faculty	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	24.6	12.5
3: Agree (%)	34.4	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	34.4	12.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.6	25.0
Total (N)	61	8

H5e: Feedback given appropriate weight in merit raises	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	28.3	25.0
3: Agree (%)	51.7	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	10.0	12.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	10.0	12.5
Total (N)	60	8

H6: Understanding of current Academic Tenure Policy	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	2.8
4: Very well (%)	30.6	25.0
3: Fairly well (%)	50.0	25.0
2: Not very well (%)	17.7	50.0
1: Not at all (%)	1.6	.
Total (N)	62	8

H7_1: Participated in RPT process as candidate	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	30.2	25.0
Yes (%)	69.8	75.0
Total (N)	63	8

H7_2: Participated in RPT process as voter	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	31.7	50.0
Yes (%)	68.3	50.0
Total (N)	63	8

H7_3: Participated in RPT process as review committee member	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	52.4	75.0
Yes (%)	47.6	25.0
Total (N)	63	8

H7_4: Have never participated in RPT process	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	85.7	75.0
Yes (%)	14.3	25.0
Total (N)	63	8

H8: Understand dept RPT standards	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.4	3.0
4: Very well (%)	52.4	37.5
3: Fairly well (%)	33.3	25.0
2: Not very well (%)	14.3	37.5
Total (N)	63	8

H9: Understand dept RPT procedures	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.4	3.0
4: Very well (%)	55.6	25.0
3: Fairly well (%)	31.7	50.0
2: Not very well (%)	11.1	25.0
1: Not at all (%)	1.6	.
Total (N)	63	8

H10: Departmental RPT standards applied consistently/fairly	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.4	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	56.4	12.5
3: Agree (%)	32.7	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	5.5	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.5	12.5
Total (N)	55	8

H11: Departmental RPT procedures applied consistently/fairly	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	54.7	12.5
3: Agree (%)	39.6	62.5
2: Disagree (%)	1.9	12.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.8	12.5
Total (N)	53	8

H12a: Sufficient resources for teaching/mentoring students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	2.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	12.1	.
3: Agree (%)	69.0	42.9
2: Disagree (%)	13.8	28.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.2	28.6
Total (N)	58	7

H12b: Sufficient resources for discovery of knowledge	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	8.9	.
3: Agree (%)	60.7	57.1
2: Disagree (%)	21.4	28.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.9	14.3
Total (N)	56	7

H12c: Sufficient resources for creative artistry and literature	White
Mean Rating	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	14.3
3: Agree (%)	57.1
2: Disagree (%)	14.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	14.3
Total (N)	7

H12d: Sufficient resources for tech/managerial innovation	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.0	.
3: Agree (%)	56.7	25.0
2: Disagree (%)	16.7	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	16.7	25.0
Total (N)	30	4

H12e: Sufficient resources for extension/engagement	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	5.0	.
3: Agree (%)	65.0	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	25.0	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.0	20.0
Total (N)	40	5

H12f: Sufficient resources for professional service	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.7	.
3: Agree (%)	58.9	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	26.8	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.6	16.7
Total (N)	56	6

H13a: Department rewards teaching/mentoring of students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	22.0	12.5
3: Agree (%)	54.2	25.0
2: Disagree (%)	20.3	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.4	12.5
Total (N)	59	8

H13b: Department rewards discovery of knowledge	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	55.2	62.5
3: Agree (%)	43.1	12.5
2: Disagree (%)	.	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.7	.
Total (N)	58	8

H13c: Department rewards creative artistry and literature	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	4.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	28.6	100.0
3: Agree (%)	42.9	.
2: Disagree (%)	14.3	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	14.3	.
Total (N)	7	1

H13d: Department rewards tech/managerial innovation	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	18.8	33.3
3: Agree (%)	59.4	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	15.6	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.3	.
Total (N)	32	6

H13e: Department rewards extension/engagement	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	27.1	33.3
3: Agree (%)	60.4	.
2: Disagree (%)	12.5	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	33.3
Total (N)	48	6

H13f: Department rewards professional service	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	14.3	28.6
3: Agree (%)	66.1	14.3
2: Disagree (%)	16.1	42.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.6	14.3
Total (N)	56	7

Section I: Post-Tenure Review

I1_1: No experience with PTR	White	Faculty of Color
Has experience (%)	65.1	50.0
No experience (%)	34.9	50.0
Total (N)	63	8

I1_2: Have had PTR Comprehensive Review	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	38.1	62.5
Yes (%)	61.9	37.5
Total (N)	63	8

I1_3: Have served on PTR committee	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	63.5	62.5
Yes (%)	36.5	37.5
Total (N)	63	8

I1_4: Have been dept/college administrator in PTR process	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	92.1	100.0
Yes (%)	7.9	.
Total (N)	63	8

I1_5: Had other PTR experience	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	93.7	100.0
Yes (%)	6.3	.
Total (N)	63	8

I2a: Easy to find PTR information on NCSU website	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	28.9	.
3: Agree (%)	55.6	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	15.6	60.0
Total (N)	45	5

I2b: PTR process known/understood in department	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	31.4	.
3: Agree (%)	41.2	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	23.5	66.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.9	.
Total (N)	51	6

I2c: Departmental PTR procedures are clear	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	32.7	.
3: Agree (%)	51.0	83.3
2: Disagree (%)	12.2	16.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.1	.
Total (N)	49	6

I2d: Departmental PTR standards are clear	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	30.6	16.7
3: Agree (%)	49.0	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	14.3	16.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.1	.
Total (N)	49	6

I2e: Departmental PTR procedures are followed equitably	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	41.9	16.7
3: Agree (%)	44.2	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	9.3	16.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.7	16.7
Total (N)	43	6

I2f: Departmental PTR standards are applied fairly	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	40.0	16.7
3: Agree (%)	46.7	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	8.9	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.4	16.7
Total (N)	45	6

I2g: Dept PTR committee members are well prepared and trained	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	26.8	.
3: Agree (%)	51.2	80.0
2: Disagree (%)	17.1	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.9	.
Total (N)	41	5

I3: Overall satisfaction with PTR process	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	17.0	50.0
3: Satisfied (%)	55.3	25.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	14.9	25.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	12.8	.
Total (N)	47	4

Section J: Pay and Compensation

J1a: My salary is competitive within my department	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	2.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	23.5	12.5
3: Agree (%)	54.9	25.0
2: Disagree (%)	13.7	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.8	37.5
Total (N)	51	8

J1b: My salary is competitive within my college	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.5	12.5
3: Agree (%)	36.2	37.5
2: Disagree (%)	25.5	12.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	12.8	37.5
Total (N)	47	8

J1c: My salary is competitive within NC State	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	2.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	38.5	16.7
3: Agree (%)	41.0	16.7
2: Disagree (%)	12.8	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.7	33.3
Total (N)	39	6

J1d: My salary is competitive within UNC system	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.3	2.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	13.8	16.7
3: Agree (%)	31.0	16.7
2: Disagree (%)	24.1	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	31.0	33.3
Total (N)	29	6

J1e: My salary is competitive within discipline at comparable institutions	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.0	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	7.7	.
3: Agree (%)	19.2	28.6
2: Disagree (%)	42.3	42.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	30.8	28.6
Total (N)	52	7

J2: Understand how faculty salaries determined	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.1
4: Very well (%)	23.8	12.5
3: Fairly well (%)	42.9	25.0
2: Not very well (%)	15.9	25.0
1: Not at all (%)	17.5	37.5
Total (N)	63	8

J3: My department links salary increase to meritorious performance	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	27.6	25.0
3: Agree (%)	53.4	37.5
2: Disagree (%)	15.5	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.4	12.5
Total (N)	58	8

J4: I have access to benefits information	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.4	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	45.2	37.5
3: Agree (%)	48.4	25.0
2: Disagree (%)	4.8	37.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.6	.
Total (N)	62	8

J5: Healthcare benefits are competitive with other institutions	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.0	1.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	5.4	.
3: Agree (%)	28.6	37.5
2: Disagree (%)	30.4	12.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	35.7	50.0
Total (N)	56	8

J6: Retirement programs are competitive with other institutions	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	9.3	.
3: Agree (%)	51.9	62.5
2: Disagree (%)	22.2	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	16.7	12.5
Total (N)	54	8

J7: Voluntary benefits programs are competitive with other institutions	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	12.5	.
3: Agree (%)	62.5	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	17.5	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.5	33.3
Total (N)	40	6

J8: I am satisfied with my compensation at NC State	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	7.9	.
3: Agree (%)	42.9	37.5
2: Disagree (%)	39.7	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.5	12.5
Total (N)	63	8

J9: Departmental environment enables work/personal life balance	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	14.3	12.5
3: Agree (%)	55.6	62.5
2: Disagree (%)	27.0	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.2	.
Total (N)	63	8

J10: NCSU environment enables work/personal life balance	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	11.5	12.5
3: Agree (%)	60.7	75.0
2: Disagree (%)	23.0	12.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.9	.
Total (N)	61	8

J11a: Importance of flexible work hours	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.7	3.8
4: Very important (%)	69.8	75.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	28.6	25.0
2: Not very important (%)	1.6	.
Total (N)	63	8

J11b: Importance of maternity/paternity leave	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.8	3.9
4: Very important (%)	77.8	87.5
3: Somewhat important (%)	20.6	12.5
2: Not very important (%)	1.6	.
Total (N)	63	8

J11c: Importance of family leave time	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.7	3.6
4: Very important (%)	74.6	62.5
3: Somewhat important (%)	25.4	37.5
Total (N)	63	8

J11d: Importance of altering tenure clock for family concerns	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.8	3.9
4: Very important (%)	79.4	87.5
3: Somewhat important (%)	19.0	12.5
2: Not very important (%)	1.6	.
Total (N)	63	8

J11e: Importance of childcare facility on or near campus	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.4	3.4
4: Very important (%)	50.8	37.5
3: Somewhat important (%)	36.5	62.5
2: Not very important (%)	12.7	.
Total (N)	63	8

J11f: Importance of tuition remission for dependents	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.6	3.8
4: Very important (%)	68.3	75.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	22.2	25.0
2: Not very important (%)	9.5	.
Total (N)	63	8

Section K: Campus Infrastructure/Physical Environment

K1: I have sufficient clerical/admin support in my dept	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	15.9	37.5
3: Agree (%)	50.8	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	23.8	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.5	12.5
Total (N)	63	8

K2: I have sufficient tech assistance	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	12.9	12.5
3: Agree (%)	40.3	37.5
2: Disagree (%)	37.1	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.7	.
Total (N)	62	8

K3: There is sufficient support staff in my college	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	14.3	12.5
3: Agree (%)	47.6	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	31.7	37.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.3	.
Total (N)	63	8

K4a: Satisfaction with office space	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	42.9	37.5
3: Satisfied (%)	41.3	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	14.3	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	1.6	12.5
Total (N)	63	8

K4b: Satisfaction with lab space	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	24.0	16.7
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	24.0	16.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.0	16.7
Total (N)	50	6

K4c: Satisfaction with classrooms in which you teach	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	17.7	12.5
3: Satisfied (%)	64.5	75.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	16.1	12.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	1.6	.
Total (N)	62	8

K4d: Satisfaction with labs in which you teach	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	13.3	25.0
3: Satisfied (%)	73.3	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	13.3	25.0
Total (N)	45	4

K4e: Satisfaction with maintenance of building in which you work	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	9.5	.
3: Satisfied (%)	55.6	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	23.8	25.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	11.1	25.0
Total (N)	63	8

K4f: Satisfaction with infrastructure of bldgs in which you work	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	12.7	12.5
3: Satisfied (%)	44.4	25.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	30.2	37.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	12.7	25.0
Total (N)	63	8

K4g: Satisfaction with availability of up-to-date equipment	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	2.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	15.9	.
3: Satisfied (%)	63.5	37.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	17.5	50.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	3.2	12.5
Total (N)	63	8

K4h: Satisfaction with availability of office supplies	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	16.1	12.5
3: Satisfied (%)	51.6	37.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	22.6	25.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	9.7	25.0
Total (N)	62	8

K4i: Satisfaction with availability of informal meeting space	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	12.9	25.0
3: Satisfied (%)	37.1	37.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	40.3	25.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	9.7	12.5
Total (N)	62	8

K4j: Satisfaction with dining options on campus	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	2.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	5.4	.
3: Satisfied (%)	45.9	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	35.1	25.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	13.5	25.0
Total (N)	37	4

K4k: Satisfaction with availability of parking	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	1.6	12.5
3: Satisfied (%)	66.1	62.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	19.4	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	12.9	25.0
Total (N)	62	8

K4l: Satisfaction with cost of parking	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.1	2.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	1.6	12.5
3: Satisfied (%)	27.0	37.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	49.2	12.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	22.2	37.5
Total (N)	63	8

K4m: Satisfaction with Wolfline	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	17.6	33.3
3: Satisfied (%)	64.7	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	11.8	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.9	.
Total (N)	17	3

K4n: Satisfaction with commute between Centennial and main	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	21.1	.
3: Satisfied (%)	63.2	80.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	10.5	20.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.3	.
Total (N)	19	5

K4o: Satisfaction with campus safety	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	5.6	.
3: Satisfied (%)	87.0	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	5.6	16.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	1.9	16.7
Total (N)	54	6

K4p: Satisfaction with campus aesthetics	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	3.3	.
3: Satisfied (%)	70.0	85.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	18.3	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	8.3	14.3
Total (N)	60	7

K4q: Satisfaction with upkeep of campus grounds	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.7	.
3: Satisfied (%)	81.7	85.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	10.0	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	1.7	14.3
Total (N)	60	7

K4r: Satisfaction with amount of green space	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	5.2	14.3
3: Satisfied (%)	58.6	71.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	31.0	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.2	14.3
Total (N)	58	7

K5a: Satisfaction with energy conservation	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	2.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	2.2	.
3: Satisfied (%)	44.4	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	40.0	66.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	13.3	.
Total (N)	45	3

K5b: Satisfaction with water conservation	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	2.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	2.2	.
3: Satisfied (%)	48.9	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	35.6	66.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	13.3	.
Total (N)	45	3

K5c: Satisfaction with recycling efforts	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	13.3	.
3: Satisfied (%)	68.3	60.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	16.7	40.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	1.7	.
Total (N)	60	5

K5d: Satisfaction with alternative transportation	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	2.3	.
3: Satisfied (%)	54.5	25.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	29.5	75.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	13.6	.
Total (N)	44	4

K5e: Satisfaction with green building practices	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.3	3.0
3: Satisfied (%)	53.1	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	28.1	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	18.8	.
Total (N)	32	2

K5f: Satisfaction with use of recycled-content resources	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	3.4	.
3: Satisfied (%)	58.6	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	31.0	50.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.9	.
Total (N)	29	2

K6: Interest in hotel/conference center on Centennial Campus	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.6
4: A lot (%)	30.2	37.5
3: Some (%)	31.7	12.5
2: A little (%)	15.9	25.0
1: None at all (%)	22.2	25.0
Total (N)	63	8

K7: Likelihood of using conference center on Centennial Campus	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	3.3
4: Very likely (%)	30.2	62.5
3: Somewhat likely (%)	34.9	12.5
2: Not very likely (%)	25.4	12.5
1: Not at all likely (%)	9.5	12.5
Total (N)	63	8

Section L: Recreation/Wellness

L1: Satisfaction with recreation activities on campus	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	2.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	9.7	.
3: Satisfied (%)	72.6	42.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	14.5	57.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	3.2	.
Total (N)	62	7

L2: Satisfaction with cultural activities on campus	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	4.8	.
3: Satisfied (%)	80.6	57.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	11.3	42.9
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	3.2	.
Total (N)	62	7

L3a: Satisfaction with Carmichael Gymnasium	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	2.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	15.8	.
3: Satisfied (%)	60.5	25.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	21.1	50.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.6	25.0
Total (N)	38	4

L3b: Satisfaction with recreation space around campus	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	15.6	.
3: Satisfied (%)	59.4	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	18.8	50.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.3	.
Total (N)	32	4

L3c: Satisfaction with organized Campus Recreation activities	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.3	.
3: Satisfied (%)	68.8	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	12.5	50.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	12.5	.
Total (N)	16	2

L3d: Satisfaction with ARTS NC State programs	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	10.0	.
3: Satisfied (%)	66.7	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	23.3	.
Total (N)	30	2

L3e: Satisfaction with Wolfpack athletic events	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	21.2	.
3: Satisfied (%)	78.8	100.0
Total (N)	33	1

L4a: How often use Carmichael Gymnasium	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	1.8
Once a week or more (%)	14.3	12.5
A few times a month (%)	6.3	.
A few times a semester (%)	19.0	.
Once a semester (%)	7.9	.
Once a year (%)	1.6	12.5
Never (%)	50.8	75.0
Total (N)	63	8

L4b: How often use recreational space around campus	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.2	2.5
Once a week or more (%)	8.2	12.5
A few times a month (%)	1.6	.
A few times a semester (%)	16.4	25.0
Once a semester (%)	6.6	.
Once a year (%)	13.1	12.5
Never (%)	54.1	50.0
Total (N)	61	8

L4c: How often participate in organized Campus Recreation activities	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	1.4	1.8
Once a week or more (%)	1.6	12.5
A few times a month (%)	3.2	.
A few times a semester (%)	3.2	.
Once a semester (%)	1.6	.
Once a year (%)	8.1	12.5
Never (%)	82.3	75.0
Total (N)	62	8

L4d: How often attend ARTS NC State programs	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.1	2.1
A few times a month (%)	3.2	.
A few times a semester (%)	16.1	37.5
Once a semester (%)	17.7	.
Once a year (%)	17.7	.
Never (%)	45.2	62.5
Total (N)	62	8

L4e: How often attend Wolfpack athletic events	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	1.4
Once a week or more (%)	1.6	.
A few times a month (%)	9.5	.
A few times a semester (%)	14.3	12.5
Once a semester (%)	17.5	.
Once a year (%)	15.9	.
Never (%)	41.3	87.5
Total (N)	63	8

L5: Interest in designated faculty-only dining facility	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	1.7	1.5
4: A great deal (%)	9.5	.
3: Some (%)	12.7	25.0
2: A little (%)	12.7	.
1: None at all (%)	65.1	75.0
Total (N)	63	8

L6: Likelihood of using gym on Centennial campus	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	1.7	2.0
4: Very likely (%)	7.9	25.0
3: Somewhat likely (%)	9.5	12.5
2: Not very likely (%)	22.2	.
1: Not at all likely (%)	60.3	62.5
Total (N)	63	8

Section M: Work Activities

M1: Total hours per week spent performing job-related work (collapsed)	White	Faculty of Color
Mean # Hrs Work	57.0	49.4
more than 60 hrs (%)	15.9	.
51 to 60 hrs (%)	55.6	25.0
41 to 50 hrs (%)	25.4	50.0
40 hrs or less (%)	3.2	25.0
Total (N)	63	8

M2A: Proportion of total hours spent on teaching/mentoring	White	Faculty of Color
Mean % of Time on Activity	35.6	36.3
more than 50% of time (%)	12.7	25.0
26% to 50% of time (%)	54.0	37.5
11% to 25% of time (%)	23.8	37.5
6% to 10% of time (%)	9.5	.
Total (N)	63	8

M2a_1r: Includes teaching (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	9.5	25.0
Yes (%)	90.5	75.0
Total (N)	63	8

M2a_2r: Includes professional development to improve teaching (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	50.8	75.0
Yes (%)	49.2	25.0
Total (N)	63	8

M2a_3r: Includes research projects with students (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	38.1	25.0
Yes (%)	61.9	75.0
Total (N)	63	8

M2a_4r: Includes supervising internships/field experiences (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	52.4	62.5
Yes (%)	47.6	37.5
Total (N)	63	8

M2a_5r: Includes student thesis/dissertation committee work (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	42.9	50.0
Yes (%)	57.1	50.0
Total (N)	63	8

M2B: Proportion of total hours spent advising students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean % of Time on Activity	4.5	5.1
11% to 25% of time (%)	1.6	.
6% to 10% of time (%)	14.3	50.0
1% to 5% of time (%)	65.1	12.5
0% of time (%)	19.0	37.5
Total (N)	63	8

M2b_1r: Includes formal advising (among those reporting time spent on advising)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	27.5	40.0
Yes (%)	72.5	60.0
Total (N)	51	5

M2b_2r: Includes informal advising (among those reporting time spent on advising)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	21.6	60.0
Yes (%)	78.4	40.0
Total (N)	51	5

M2C: Proportion of total hours spent on research/scholarly activities	White	Faculty of Color
Mean % of Time on Activity	30.5	31.3
more than 50% of time (%)	12.7	25.0
26% to 50% of time (%)	46.0	25.0
11% to 25% of time (%)	20.6	25.0
6% to 10% of time (%)	9.5	12.5
1% to 5% of time (%)	11.1	.
0% of time (%)	.	12.5
Total (N)	63	8

M2D: Proportion of total hours spent on creative artistry/literature	White	Faculty of Color
Mean % of Time on Activity	0.2	0.0
1% to 5% of time (%)	4.8	.
0% of time (%)	95.2	100.0
Total (N)	63	8

M2E: Proportion of total hours spent on extension/engagement/econ dev	White	Faculty of Color
Mean % of Time on Activity	6.7	4.4
26% to 50% of time (%)	6.3	.
11% to 25% of time (%)	14.3	12.5
6% to 10% of time (%)	9.5	12.5
1% to 5% of time (%)	23.8	25.0
0% of time (%)	46.0	50.0
Total (N)	63	8

M2e_1r: Includes service learning teaching/mentoring (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	70.6	50.0
Yes (%)	29.4	50.0
Total (N)	34	4

M2e_2r: Includes extension education/non-credit programs (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	50.0	25.0
Yes (%)	50.0	75.0
Total (N)	34	4

M2e_3r: Includes economic development training/tech assistance (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	94.1	75.0
Yes (%)	5.9	25.0
Total (N)	34	4

M2e_4r: Includes partnering with private sector - job/investment creation (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	91.2	50.0
Yes (%)	8.8	50.0
Total (N)	34	4

M2e_5r: Public service grants/contracts (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	94.1	25.0
Yes (%)	5.9	75.0
Total (N)	34	4

M2F: Proportion of total hours spent on service work	White	Faculty of Color
Mean % of Time on Activity	17.2	9.9
more than 50% of time (%)	6.3	.
26% to 50% of time (%)	11.1	.
11% to 25% of time (%)	23.8	37.5
6% to 10% of time (%)	28.6	12.5
1% to 5% of time (%)	27.0	50.0
0% of time (%)	3.2	.
Total (N)	63	8

M2f_1r: Includes advising student groups (among those reporting time spent on service work)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	68.9	75.0
Yes (%)	31.1	25.0
Total (N)	61	8

M2f_2r: Includes dept/college/university committees (among those reporting time spent on service work)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	24.6	37.5
Yes (%)	75.4	62.5
Total (N)	61	8

M2f_3r: Includes professional service (among those reporting time spent on service work)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	26.2	50.0
Yes (%)	73.8	50.0
Total (N)	61	8

M2f_4r: Includes academic program assessment activities (among those reporting time spent on service work)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	73.8	62.5
Yes (%)	26.2	37.5
Total (N)	61	8

M2f_5r: Includes other university service (among those reporting time spent on service work)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	65.6	62.5
Yes (%)	34.4	37.5
Total (N)	61	8

M2G: Proportion of total hours spent on tech/managerial innovation	White	Faculty of Color
Mean % of Time on Activity	0.7	1.3
11% to 25% of time (%)	1.6	.
6% to 10% of time (%)	.	12.5
1% to 5% of time (%)	11.1	.
0% of time (%)	87.3	87.5
Total (N)	63	8

M2H: Proportion of total hours spent on dept/college admin duties	White	Faculty of Color
Mean % of Time on Activity	4.7	3.8
26% to 50% of time (%)	4.8	12.5
11% to 25% of time (%)	4.8	.
6% to 10% of time (%)	6.3	.
1% to 5% of time (%)	19.0	.
0% of time (%)	65.1	87.5
Total (N)	63	8

M3_1: Worked summer at NCSU without overload pay	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	46.0	62.5
Yes (%)	54.0	37.5
Total (N)	63	8

M3_2: Taught at NCSU on overload basis	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	95.2	100.0
Yes (%)	4.8	.
Total (N)	63	8

M3_3: Taught NCSU distance education class	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	96.8	75.0
Yes (%)	3.2	25.0
Total (N)	63	8

M3_4: Taught for another academic institution	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	81.0	62.5
Yes (%)	19.0	37.5
Total (N)	63	8

M3_5: Did outside consulting/freelance for pay	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	39.7	62.5
Yes (%)	60.3	37.5
Total (N)	63	8

M3_6: Did outside consulting/freelance without pay	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	58.7	75.0
Yes (%)	41.3	25.0
Total (N)	63	8

M3_7: Had other secondary employment	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	95.2	75.0
Yes (%)	4.8	25.0
Total (N)	63	8

M4: Frequency of volunteer work past 2 years	White	Faculty of Color
Never (%)	14.3	25.0
A few times (%)	52.4	25.0
About once per month (%)	17.5	25.0
Two or three times per month (%)	9.5	12.5
At least once per week (%)	6.3	12.5
Total (N)	63	8

M5: Frequency of public policy work past 5 years	White	Faculty of Color
Never (%)	60.3	75.0
Once or twice (%)	14.3	.
Three to five times (%)	11.1	12.5
Six to ten times (%)	6.3	.
More than 10 times (%)	7.9	12.5
Total (N)	63	8

M6: Management of work-related demands of past 2 years	White	Faculty of Color
1: Managing everything just fine (%)	4.8	.
2 (%)	17.5	37.5
3 (%)	34.9	25.0
4 (%)	31.7	25.0
5: Completely overwhelmed (%)	11.1	12.5
Total (N)	63	8

M7: Change how you spend your work time	White	Faculty of Color
I would change how I spent time (%)	74.6	60.0
I would not change a thing (%)	25.4	40.0
Total (N)	59	5

Section N: Conclusions/Overall Satisfaction

N1: Satisfaction with your "fit" in department	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	33.9	37.5
3: Satisfied (%)	48.4	25.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	14.5	37.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	3.2	.
Total (N)	62	8

N2: I generally feel valued in my department	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	46.8	37.5
3: Agree (%)	38.7	37.5
2: Disagree (%)	9.7	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.8	.
Total (N)	62	8

N3a: I am treated with respect by my students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	54.8	50.0
3: Agree (%)	41.9	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	3.2	.
Total (N)	62	8

N3b: I am treated with respect by dept support staff	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.6	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	71.0	37.5
3: Agree (%)	24.2	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	1.6	12.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.2	.
Total (N)	62	8

N3c: I am treated with respect faculty in my dept	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	61.3	25.0
3: Agree (%)	32.3	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	6.5	25.0
Total (N)	62	8

N3d: I am treated with respect by NCSU administrators	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	34.4	25.0
3: Agree (%)	55.7	37.5
2: Disagree (%)	4.9	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.9	12.5
Total (N)	61	8

N4: I would recommend my department as a good place to work	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	44.3	25.0
3: Agree (%)	47.5	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	6.6	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.6	.
Total (N)	61	8

N5a: Amount of stress due to reappointment, promotion or Tenure	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	2.5
4: A great deal (%)	19.0	33.3
3: Some (%)	32.8	16.7
2: A little (%)	19.0	16.7
1: None at all (%)	29.3	33.3
Total (N)	58	6

N5b: Amount of stress from research/publication demands	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.1
4: A great deal (%)	37.1	62.5
3: Some (%)	40.3	.
2: A little (%)	14.5	25.0
1: None at all (%)	8.1	12.5
Total (N)	62	8

N5c: Amount of stress from professional Development	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.5
4: A great deal (%)	17.7	25.0
3: Some (%)	40.3	25.0
2: A little (%)	17.7	25.0
1: None at all (%)	24.2	25.0
Total (N)	62	8

N5d: Amount of stress from institutional procedures	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.9
4: A great deal (%)	17.2	28.6
3: Some (%)	44.8	42.9
2: A little (%)	22.4	14.3
1: None at all (%)	15.5	14.3
Total (N)	58	7

N5e: Amount of stress from committee work	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.1
4: A great deal (%)	13.6	12.5
3: Some (%)	35.6	12.5
2: A little (%)	33.9	50.0
1: None at all (%)	16.9	25.0
Total (N)	59	8

N5f: Amount of stress from relationships with students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	1.7	1.9
4: A great deal (%)	1.6	12.5
3: Some (%)	9.7	12.5
2: A little (%)	43.5	25.0
1: None at all (%)	45.2	50.0
Total (N)	62	8

N5g: Amount of stress from relationships with faculty in dept	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.0	2.1
4: A great deal (%)	8.2	12.5
3: Some (%)	14.8	25.0
2: A little (%)	42.6	25.0
1: None at all (%)	34.4	37.5
Total (N)	61	8

N5h: Amount of stress from relationships w/dept admin	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	1.7	1.8
4: A great deal (%)	1.6	.
3: Some (%)	18.0	12.5
2: A little (%)	24.6	50.0
1: None at all (%)	55.7	37.5
Total (N)	61	8

N5i: Amount of stress from relationships w/college admin	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.1	2.4
4: A great deal (%)	8.5	25.0
3: Some (%)	27.1	12.5
2: A little (%)	27.1	37.5
1: None at all (%)	37.3	25.0
Total (N)	59	8

N5j: Amount of stress from workload	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	2.9
4: A great deal (%)	50.8	37.5
3: Some (%)	27.9	25.0
2: A little (%)	18.0	25.0
1: None at all (%)	3.3	12.5
Total (N)	61	8

N5k: Amount of stress from work/personal life balance	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	2.6
4: A great deal (%)	40.3	37.5
3: Some (%)	33.9	.
2: A little (%)	21.0	50.0
1: None at all (%)	4.8	12.5
Total (N)	62	8

N5l: Amount of stress from working with under-prepared students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.3	3.1
4: A great deal (%)	8.5	28.6
3: Some (%)	28.8	57.1
2: A little (%)	42.4	14.3
1: None at all (%)	20.3	.
Total (N)	59	7

N5m: Amount of stress from self-assessment activities	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.3	2.0
4: A great deal (%)	4.8	.
3: Some (%)	38.7	37.5
2: A little (%)	41.9	25.0
1: None at all (%)	14.5	37.5
Total (N)	62	8

N5n: Amount of stress from program assessment requirements	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.1	1.8
4: A great deal (%)	1.9	16.7
3: Some (%)	27.8	.
2: A little (%)	44.4	33.3
1: None at all (%)	25.9	50.0
Total (N)	54	6

N6: Overall satisfaction with NCSU	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	21.0	25.0
3: Satisfied (%)	64.5	62.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	12.9	12.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	1.6	.
Total (N)	62	8

N7: More or less satisfied with NC State, compared to 5 yrs ago	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.4
A lot more satisfied now (%)	8.1	12.5
Somewhat more satisfied now (%)	35.5	50.0
Neither more or less satisfied now (%)	21.0	12.5
Somewhat less satisfied now (%)	29.0	12.5
A lot less satisfied now (%)	6.5	12.5
Total (N)	62	8

N8: Ever considered leaving NC State for another university	White	Faculty of Color
No - never considered leaving (%)	14.5	12.5
Yes - not very seriously (%)	14.5	12.5
Yes - somewhat seriously (%)	30.6	50.0
Yes - very seriously (%)	40.3	25.0
Total (N)	62	8

N10: Ever considered leaving academe, since coming to NC State	White	Faculty of Color
No - never considered leaving (%)	29.0	50.0
Yes - not very seriously (%)	35.5	12.5
Yes - somewhat seriously (%)	14.5	12.5
Yes - very seriously (%)	21.0	25.0
Total (N)	62	8

Endnote:

1. "Faculty of Color" includes African American, Asian, Hispanic, and Native American respondents. Due to small cell sizes at this level of analysis,
this categorization of race/ethnicity was necessary to protect respondent confidentiality. (back)

For more information on the NC State University 2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey contact:
Dr. Nancy Whelchel, Associate Director for Survey Research
Office of Institutional Planning and Research
Box 7002
NCSU
Phone: (919) 515-4184
Email: ncsu_surveys@ncsu.edu

Posted: April, 2007