North Carolina State University
2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey:

Results for the College of Veterinary Medicine
by Gender

To skip directly to a particular section, select the section below.

Section B: Image and Vision	Section I: Post-Tenure Review
Section C: Leadership	Section J: Pay and Compensation
Section D: Faculty-Administration Relationships	Section K: Campus Infrastructure/Physical Environment
Section E: Diversity/Multiculturalism	Section L: Recreation/Wellness
Section F: Working Relationships	Section M: Work Activities
Section G: Faculty Support & Professional Development	Section N: Conclusions/Overall Satisfaction
Section H: Performance Review, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure

To download a Microsoft Word version of this document, click here.

A2: Ever held an administrative position	Male	Female
..... No (%)	78.0	80.0
..... Yes (%)	22.0	20.0
Total (N)	50	25

Section B: Image and Vision

B1a: Department doing good job of recruiting faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	34.7	24.0
3: Agree (%)	46.9	48.0
2: Disagree (%)	18.4	24.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	4.0
Total (N)	49	25

B1b: Department creating culture where faculty can develop to full potential	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	28.0	16.7
3: Agree (%)	54.0	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	18.0	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	8.3
Total (N)	50	24

B1c: Department retaining most effective and productive faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.0	4.2
3: Agree (%)	52.0	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	30.0	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.0	12.5
Total (N)	50	24

B2a: Department national reputation for undergraduate educ	Male	Female
Mean Rating	4.1	5.0
5: Very strong (%)	25.0	100.0
4: Strong (%)	58.3	.
3: Average (%)	16.7	.
Total (N)	12	1

B2b: Department national reputation for graduate education	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	3.7
5: Very strong (%)	20.8	26.1
4: Strong (%)	33.3	26.1
3: Average (%)	29.2	34.8
2: Weak (%)	16.7	13.0
Total (N)	48	23

B2c: Department national reputation for research & scholarly activity	Male	Female
Mean Rating	4.1	4.0
5: Very strong (%)	28.6	28.0
4: Strong (%)	51.0	44.0
3: Average (%)	20.4	28.0
Total (N)	49	25

B2d: Department national reputation for creative artistry and literature	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	2.7
5: Very strong (%)	16.7	.
4: Strong (%)	50.0	.
3: Average (%)	.	85.7
2: Weak (%)	16.7	.
1: Very weak (%)	16.7	14.3
Total (N)	6	7

B2e: Department national reputation for tech & managerial innovation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.2
5: Very strong (%)	8.3	.
4: Strong (%)	58.3	25.0
3: Average (%)	16.7	66.7
2: Weak (%)	8.3	8.3
1: Very weak (%)	8.3	.
Total (N)	24	12

B2f: Department national reputation for extension & engagement	Male	Female
Mean Rating	4.0	3.4
5: Very strong (%)	27.5	19.0
4: Strong (%)	47.5	28.6
3: Average (%)	22.5	38.1
2: Weak (%)	2.5	4.8
1: Very weak (%)	.	9.5
Total (N)	40	21

B2g: Department national reputation for contrib to econ Development	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.2
5: Very strong (%)	6.1	6.3
4: Strong (%)	36.4	25.0
3: Average (%)	48.5	56.3
2: Weak (%)	6.1	6.3
1: Very weak (%)	3.0	6.3
Total (N)	33	16

B3a: Grade undergraduate majors' ability to meet prog demands	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.8	4.0
A (%)	15.4	.
B (%)	61.5	100.0
C (%)	15.4	.
D (%)	7.7	.
Total (N)	13	2

B3b: Grade graduate student ability to meet prog demands	Male	Female
Mean Rating	4.2	3.8
A (%)	26.0	20.0
B (%)	64.0	56.0
C (%)	10.0	16.0
D (%)	.	4.0
F (%)	.	4.0
Total (N)	50	25

B3c: Grade demonstrated professional ability of faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	4.6	4.6
A (%)	62.0	56.0
B (%)	36.0	44.0
C (%)	2.0	.
Total (N)	50	25

B3d: Grade professional achievement of faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	4.6	4.6
A (%)	64.0	60.0
B (%)	36.0	36.0
C (%)	.	4.0
Total (N)	50	25

B3e: Grade own demonstrated professional ability	Male	Female
Mean Rating	4.5	4.4
A (%)	52.0	48.0
B (%)	42.0	44.0
C (%)	6.0	8.0
Total (N)	50	25

B3f: Grade own professional achievement	Male	Female
Mean Rating	4.4	4.2
A (%)	50.0	32.0
B (%)	44.0	56.0
C (%)	6.0	12.0
Total (N)	50	25

B4: Department's vision for the future	Male	Female
Clear vision; actively working toward goals (%)	52.0	32.0
Vision with slow progress (%)	32.0	32.0
No clear vision (%)	12.0	24.0
Not familiar (%)	4.0	12.0
Total (N)	50	25

B5: Agreement with department vision for future	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	42.9	25.0
3: Agree (%)	45.2	68.8
2: Disagree (%)	11.9	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	6.3
Total (N)	42	16

B6: College's vision for the future	Male	Female
Clear vision; actively working toward goals (%)	44.0	44.0
Vision with slow progress (%)	42.0	32.0
No clear vision (%)	6.0	16.0
Not familiar (%)	8.0	8.0
Total (N)	50	25

B7a: Department change in next five years	Male	Female
Change for the better (%)	66.0	36.0
Change for the worse (%)	14.0	8.0
Not really change (%)	20.0	56.0
Total (N)	50	25

B7b: College change in next five years	Male	Female
Change for the better (%)	65.3	40.0
Change for the worse (%)	12.2	16.0
Not really change (%)	22.4	44.0
Total (N)	49	25

B7c: NC State change in next five years	Male	Female
Change for the better (%)	54.0	20.0
Change for the worse (%)	6.0	4.0
Not really change (%)	40.0	76.0
Total (N)	50	25

Section C: Leadership

C1a: Dept admin communication with faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	3.2
4: Excellent (%)	63.3	39.1
3: Good (%)	30.6	47.8
2: Fair (%)	6.1	8.7
1: Poor (%)	.	4.3
Total (N)	49	23

C1b: Dept admin seek faculty input for dept vision	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	55.1	33.3
3: Good (%)	28.6	38.1
2: Fair (%)	14.3	14.3
1: Poor (%)	2.0	14.3
Total (N)	49	21

C1c: Dept admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	49.0	31.8
3: Good (%)	28.6	40.9
2: Fair (%)	18.4	18.2
1: Poor (%)	4.1	9.1
Total (N)	49	22

C1d: Dept admin delegate dept responsibility to faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.1
4: Excellent (%)	42.9	21.1
3: Good (%)	40.8	63.2
2: Fair (%)	10.2	15.8
1: Poor (%)	6.1	.
Total (N)	49	19

C1e: Dept admin grant faculty autonomy	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.4
4: Excellent (%)	59.2	47.8
3: Good (%)	32.7	43.5
2: Fair (%)	4.1	8.7
1: Poor (%)	4.1	.
Total (N)	49	23

C1f: Dept admin set clear and explicit priorities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	31.3	22.7
3: Good (%)	50.0	36.4
2: Fair (%)	18.8	31.8
1: Poor (%)	.	9.1
Total (N)	48	22

C1g: Dept admin appreciate your contrib to mission	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.2
4: Excellent (%)	53.1	43.5
3: Good (%)	30.6	34.8
2: Fair (%)	14.3	17.4
1: Poor (%)	2.0	4.3
Total (N)	49	23

C1h: Dept admin conflict resolution	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.5
4: Excellent (%)	31.1	15.0
3: Good (%)	46.7	40.0
2: Fair (%)	15.6	25.0
1: Poor (%)	6.7	20.0
Total (N)	45	20

C1i: Dept admin provide necessary resources	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	34.7	17.4
3: Good (%)	34.7	52.2
2: Fair (%)	22.4	17.4
1: Poor (%)	8.2	13.0
Total (N)	49	23

C1j: Dept admin allocate resources fairly	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	45.8	27.3
3: Good (%)	33.3	45.5
2: Fair (%)	16.7	13.6
1: Poor (%)	4.2	13.6
Total (N)	48	22

C1k: Dept admin serve as advocate for dept to college	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.1
4: Excellent (%)	63.8	31.8
3: Good (%)	23.4	54.5
2: Fair (%)	12.8	4.5
1: Poor (%)	.	9.1
Total (N)	47	22

C1l: Dept admin support academic freedom	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	3.3
4: Excellent (%)	67.4	40.9
3: Good (%)	28.3	45.5
2: Fair (%)	4.3	13.6
Total (N)	46	22

C1m: Dept admin make rational decisions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	57.1	27.3
3: Good (%)	36.7	54.5
2: Fair (%)	6.1	13.6
1: Poor (%)	.	4.5
Total (N)	49	22

C1n: Dept admin make equitable decisions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	57.4	28.6
3: Good (%)	31.9	47.6
2: Fair (%)	10.6	19.0
1: Poor (%)	.	4.8
Total (N)	47	21

C1o: Dept admin promote diversity within dept	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	37.8	18.8
3: Good (%)	42.2	31.3
2: Fair (%)	15.6	43.8
1: Poor (%)	4.4	6.3
Total (N)	45	16

C2a: College admin communication with faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.2
4: Excellent (%)	18.0	.
3: Good (%)	48.0	37.5
2: Fair (%)	26.0	41.7
1: Poor (%)	8.0	20.8
Total (N)	50	24

C2b: College admin seek faculty input for vision	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	1.9
4: Excellent (%)	14.6	.
3: Good (%)	37.5	30.4
2: Fair (%)	35.4	30.4
1: Poor (%)	12.5	39.1
Total (N)	48	23

C2c: College admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.0
4: Excellent (%)	6.8	.
3: Good (%)	40.9	30.4
2: Fair (%)	34.1	34.8
1: Poor (%)	18.2	34.8
Total (N)	44	23

C2d: College admin grant departmental autonomy	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	29.5	5.3
3: Good (%)	43.2	73.7
2: Fair (%)	22.7	15.8
1: Poor (%)	4.5	5.3
Total (N)	44	19

C2e: College admin set clear and explicit priorities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.4
4: Excellent (%)	17.8	8.0
3: Good (%)	55.6	44.0
2: Fair (%)	22.2	32.0
1: Poor (%)	4.4	16.0
Total (N)	45	25

C2f: College admin appreciate your contrib to mission	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.4
4: Excellent (%)	19.6	4.5
3: Good (%)	45.7	40.9
2: Fair (%)	28.3	40.9
1: Poor (%)	6.5	13.6
Total (N)	46	22

C2g: College admin conflict resolution	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	1.9
4: Excellent (%)	5.1	.
3: Good (%)	51.3	26.3
2: Fair (%)	30.8	42.1
1: Poor (%)	12.8	31.6
Total (N)	39	19

C2h: College admin provide necessary resources	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.4
4: Excellent (%)	12.2	4.0
3: Good (%)	57.1	44.0
2: Fair (%)	18.4	36.0
1: Poor (%)	12.2	16.0
Total (N)	49	25

C2i: College admin allocate resources fairly	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.4
4: Excellent (%)	17.0	.
3: Good (%)	44.7	63.6
2: Fair (%)	27.7	13.6
1: Poor (%)	10.6	22.7
Total (N)	47	22

C2j: College admin serve as advocate for college to univ	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	46.5	23.5
3: Good (%)	34.9	52.9
2: Fair (%)	16.3	11.8
1: Poor (%)	2.3	11.8
Total (N)	43	17

C2k: College admin support academic freedom	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	46.5	17.4
3: Good (%)	41.9	65.2
2: Fair (%)	4.7	13.0
1: Poor (%)	7.0	4.3
Total (N)	43	23

C2l: College admin make rational decisions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.4
4: Excellent (%)	29.5	.
3: Good (%)	47.7	50.0
2: Fair (%)	20.5	36.4
1: Poor (%)	2.3	13.6
Total (N)	44	22

C2m: College admin make equitable decisions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.3
4: Excellent (%)	22.7	.
3: Good (%)	45.5	42.9
2: Fair (%)	20.5	42.9
1: Poor (%)	11.4	14.3
Total (N)	44	21

C2n: College admin promote diversity within college	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	31.1	5.0
3: Good (%)	44.4	60.0
2: Fair (%)	17.8	30.0
1: Poor (%)	6.7	5.0
Total (N)	45	20

C3a: Univ admin communication with faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	1.9
4: Excellent (%)	4.4	.
3: Good (%)	44.4	23.8
2: Fair (%)	31.1	42.9
1: Poor (%)	20.0	33.3
Total (N)	45	21

C3b: Univ admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.0
4: Excellent (%)	5.7	.
3: Good (%)	34.3	30.0
2: Fair (%)	40.0	40.0
1: Poor (%)	20.0	30.0
Total (N)	35	10

C3c: Univ admin set clear and explicit priorities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.3
4: Excellent (%)	10.0	6.3
3: Good (%)	45.0	37.5
2: Fair (%)	37.5	37.5
1: Poor (%)	7.5	18.8
Total (N)	40	16

C3d: Univ admin serves as advocate for univ to constituents	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	20.0	20.0
3: Good (%)	55.0	60.0
2: Fair (%)	17.5	10.0
1: Poor (%)	7.5	10.0
Total (N)	40	10

C3e: Univ admin support academic freedom	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.1
4: Excellent (%)	21.4	18.8
3: Good (%)	61.9	68.8
2: Fair (%)	7.1	12.5
1: Poor (%)	9.5	.
Total (N)	42	16

C3f: Univ admin make rational decisions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.2
4: Excellent (%)	10.8	.
3: Good (%)	62.2	44.4
2: Fair (%)	21.6	33.3
1: Poor (%)	5.4	22.2
Total (N)	37	9

C3g: Univ admin make equitable decisions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.0
4: Excellent (%)	10.5	.
3: Good (%)	55.3	33.3
2: Fair (%)	26.3	33.3
1: Poor (%)	7.9	33.3
Total (N)	38	9

C3h: Univ admin promote diversity within university	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.5
4: Excellent (%)	26.3	.
3: Good (%)	52.6	61.5
2: Fair (%)	13.2	30.8
1: Poor (%)	7.9	7.7
Total (N)	38	13

Section D: Faculty-Administration Relationships

D1a: I am encouraged to give input on curricular issues	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	40.0	37.5
3: Agree (%)	46.0	54.2
2: Disagree (%)	10.0	8.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.0	.
Total (N)	50	24

D1b: I am encouraged to give input on prog assessment	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	32.0	21.7
3: Agree (%)	46.0	60.9
2: Disagree (%)	18.0	17.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.0	.
Total (N)	50	23

D1c: I am encouraged to give input on dept hiring	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	38.0	37.5
3: Agree (%)	52.0	41.7
2: Disagree (%)	6.0	12.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.0	8.3
Total (N)	50	24

D1d: I am encouraged to give input on college admin appointments	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	18.0	12.5
3: Agree (%)	48.0	45.8
2: Disagree (%)	24.0	29.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	10.0	12.5
Total (N)	50	24

D1e: I am encouraged to give input on university admin appointments	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.0	4.3
3: Agree (%)	34.0	30.4
2: Disagree (%)	46.0	52.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	10.0	13.0
Total (N)	50	23

D2: Familiarity with academic program assessment in dept	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9
4: Very familiar (%)	30.0	24.0
3: Somewhat familiar (%)	32.0	48.0
2: Not very familiar (%)	34.0	24.0
1: Not at all familiar (%)	4.0	4.0
Total (N)	50	25

D3a: Understanding of resource allocation to university	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.0
4: Very well (%)	10.0	.
3: Fairly well (%)	30.0	16.0
2: Not very well (%)	46.0	64.0
1: Not at all (%)	14.0	20.0
Total (N)	50	25

D3b: Understanding of resource allocation to college	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.0
4: Very well (%)	6.0	.
3: Fairly well (%)	46.0	16.0
2: Not very well (%)	40.0	68.0
1: Not at all (%)	8.0	16.0
Total (N)	50	25

D3c: Understanding of resource allocation to department	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.4
4: Very well (%)	32.0	8.0
3: Fairly well (%)	36.0	32.0
2: Not very well (%)	28.0	56.0
1: Not at all (%)	4.0	4.0
Total (N)	50	25

D3d: Understanding of resource allocation within department	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.2
4: Very well (%)	56.0	37.5
3: Fairly well (%)	24.0	45.8
2: Not very well (%)	18.0	16.7
1: Not at all (%)	2.0	.
Total (N)	50	24

D4: Faculty have sufficient input on dept resource allocation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	26.5	16.0
3: Agree (%)	55.1	56.0
2: Disagree (%)	18.4	24.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	4.0
Total (N)	49	25

D5: Dept faculty searches/appointments are collegial and inclusive	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	44.9	48.0
3: Agree (%)	51.0	32.0
2: Disagree (%)	2.0	12.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.0	8.0
Total (N)	49	25

D6a: Relations between faculty in dept and dept admin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.4
4: Excellent (%)	60.0	47.8
3: Good (%)	36.0	43.5
2: Fair (%)	2.0	8.7
1: Poor (%)	2.0	.
Total (N)	50	23

D6b: Relations between faculty in dept and college admin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	22.0	17.4
3: Good (%)	62.0	39.1
2: Fair (%)	8.0	34.8
1: Poor (%)	8.0	8.7
Total (N)	50	23

D6c: Relations between faculty in dept and univ admin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.2
4: Excellent (%)	5.6	.
3: Good (%)	38.9	36.4
2: Fair (%)	33.3	45.5
1: Poor (%)	22.2	18.2
Total (N)	36	11

D6d: Relations between all faculty and univ admin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.3
3: Good (%)	42.4	50.0
2: Fair (%)	42.4	25.0
1: Poor (%)	15.2	25.0
Total (N)	33	8

D7a: Faculty Senate effective commun between faculty and univ admin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	8.3	.
3: Agree (%)	30.6	46.2
2: Disagree (%)	47.2	23.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	13.9	30.8
Total (N)	36	13

D7b: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty in general	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	5.9	.
3: Agree (%)	38.2	41.7
2: Disagree (%)	35.3	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	20.6	33.3
Total (N)	34	12

D7c: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty like me	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.1	2.0
3: Agree (%)	28.1	25.0
2: Disagree (%)	50.0	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	21.9	25.0
Total (N)	32	12

D8: Effectiveness of university grievance procedures	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.1
4: Very effective (%)	23.1	12.5
3: Somewhat effective (%)	38.5	25.0
2: Not very effective (%)	23.1	25.0
1: Not at all effective (%)	15.4	37.5
Total (N)	26	8

D9: Importance of "ombuds" for informal conflict resolution	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	3.5
4: Very important (%)	61.2	52.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	32.7	44.0
2: Not very important (%)	6.1	4.0
Total (N)	49	25

Section E: Diversity/Multiculturalism

E1: Importance of institutional emphasis on diversity/multiculturalism	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.3
4: Very important (%)	56.3	44.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	39.6	44.0
2: Not very important (%)	4.2	12.0
Total (N)	48	25

E2: Importance of diversity to enhanced learning in own classroom	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8
4: Very important (%)	23.4	25.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	42.6	37.5
2: Not very important (%)	31.9	33.3
1: Not at all important (%)	2.1	4.2
Total (N)	47	24

E3: NCSU prepares students to live and work in diverse society	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.5	13.3
3: Agree (%)	57.9	73.3
2: Disagree (%)	21.1	6.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	10.5	6.7
Total (N)	38	15

E4a: My dept recruits historically underrepresented students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.0	18.8
3: Agree (%)	54.5	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	15.9	31.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.5	.
Total (N)	44	16

E4b: My dept retains historically underrepresented students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	18.6	20.0
3: Agree (%)	65.1	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	14.0	6.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.3	6.7
Total (N)	43	15

E4c: My dept supports historically underrepresented students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	19.5	20.0
3: Agree (%)	65.9	53.3
2: Disagree (%)	12.2	6.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.4	20.0
Total (N)	41	15

E4d: My dept recruits historically underrepresented faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	21.1	13.3
3: Agree (%)	52.6	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	21.1	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.3	13.3
Total (N)	38	15

E4e: My dept retains historically underrepresented faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	23.1	13.3
3: Agree (%)	48.7	46.7
2: Disagree (%)	20.5	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.7	20.0
Total (N)	39	15

E4f: My dept supports historically underrepresented faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	19.4	12.5
3: Agree (%)	58.3	43.8
2: Disagree (%)	16.7	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.6	18.8
Total (N)	36	16

E5a: Dept environ accepting/respectful of age	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	60.0	47.8
3: Agree (%)	37.8	47.8
2: Disagree (%)	2.2	4.3
Total (N)	45	23

E5b: Dept environ accepting/respectful of disability status	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	61.5	33.3
3: Agree (%)	33.3	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	2.6	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.6	.
Total (N)	39	15

E5c: Dept environ accepting/respectful of gender	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	63.8	41.7
3: Agree (%)	34.0	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	2.1	8.3
Total (N)	47	24

E5d: Dept environ accepting/respectful of military status	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	60.0	50.0
3: Agree (%)	37.5	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	2.5	.
Total (N)	40	14

E5e: Dept environ accepting/respectful of nationality/ethnic origin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	63.0	50.0
3: Agree (%)	32.6	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.3	.
Total (N)	46	22

E5f: Dept environ accepting/respectful of race and color	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	60.0	40.9
3: Agree (%)	35.6	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	9.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.4	.
Total (N)	45	22

E5g: Dept environ accepting/respectful of religion	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	61.0	40.0
3: Agree (%)	36.6	55.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	5.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.4	.
Total (N)	41	20

E5h: Dept environ accepting/respectful of sexual orientation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	65.8	36.8
3: Agree (%)	31.6	57.9
2: Disagree (%)	.	5.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.6	.
Total (N)	38	19

E6a: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of age	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	64.6	71.4
3: Agree (%)	33.3	23.8
2: Disagree (%)	2.1	4.8
Total (N)	48	21

E6b: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of disability status	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	63.6	68.8
3: Agree (%)	34.1	31.3
2: Disagree (%)	2.3	.
Total (N)	44	16

E6c: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of gender	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	64.6	68.2
3: Agree (%)	35.4	22.7
2: Disagree (%)	.	9.1
Total (N)	48	22

E6d: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of military status	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	63.6	70.6
3: Agree (%)	34.1	29.4
2: Disagree (%)	2.3	.
Total (N)	44	17

E6e: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of national/ethnic origin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	66.0	66.7
3: Agree (%)	31.9	28.6
2: Disagree (%)	.	4.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.1	.
Total (N)	47	21

E6f: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of race and color	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	60.9	63.6
3: Agree (%)	37.0	27.3
2: Disagree (%)	.	9.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.2	.
Total (N)	46	22

E6g: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of religion	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	62.2	70.0
3: Agree (%)	35.6	25.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	5.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.2	.
Total (N)	45	20

E6h: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of sexual orientation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	62.8	63.2
3: Agree (%)	34.9	31.6
2: Disagree (%)	.	5.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.3	.
Total (N)	43	19

E7: Faculty diversity/multiculturalism enhancement of intellectual diversity in dept	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.5
4: A great deal (%)	11.1	16.7
3: Some (%)	60.0	29.2
2: A little (%)	24.4	37.5
1: Not at all (%)	4.4	16.7
Total (N)	45	24

E8: Inclusion of diversity-related topics, scholarship, etc in your courses	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.8	1.3
4: A great deal (%)	4.4	8.0
3: Some (%)	24.4	.
2: A little (%)	20.0	8.0
1: Not at all (%)	51.1	84.0
Total (N)	45	25

E9a: Interest in research, extension, art endeavors outside U.S.	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.6
4: A great deal (%)	45.8	24.0
3: Some (%)	29.2	32.0
2: A little (%)	8.3	28.0
1: None (%)	16.7	16.0
Total (N)	48	25

E9b: Interest in teaching study abroad	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.1
4: A great deal (%)	27.1	8.0
3: Some (%)	33.3	28.0
2: A little (%)	10.4	32.0
1: None (%)	29.2	32.0
Total (N)	48	25

E9c: Interest in participating in spring break service learning	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.8	1.6
4: A great deal (%)	6.4	4.2
3: Some (%)	21.3	16.7
2: A little (%)	21.3	16.7
1: None (%)	51.1	62.5
Total (N)	47	24

E9d: Interest in participating in international service projects	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.2
4: A great deal (%)	26.1	8.0
3: Some (%)	37.0	32.0
2: A little (%)	19.6	32.0
1: None (%)	17.4	28.0
Total (N)	46	25

E9e: Interest in teaching in international studies major	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.8	1.4
4: A great deal (%)	6.4	4.0
3: Some (%)	21.3	8.0
2: A little (%)	21.3	16.0
1: None (%)	51.1	72.0
Total (N)	47	25

E9f: Interest in advising international students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	1.8
4: A great deal (%)	23.4	12.0
3: Some (%)	34.0	8.0
2: A little (%)	21.3	24.0
1: None (%)	21.3	56.0
Total (N)	47	25

Section F: Working Relationships

F1: There is unity/cohesion among faculty in my department	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	35.4	32.0
3: Agree (%)	47.9	32.0
2: Disagree (%)	14.6	28.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.1	8.0
Total (N)	48	25

F2a: Good communication between my students and me	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	41.7	25.0
3: Agree (%)	52.1	75.0
2: Disagree (%)	4.2	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.1	.
Total (N)	48	24

F2b: Good communication between dept and our students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.0	9.1
3: Agree (%)	68.2	63.6
2: Disagree (%)	4.5	18.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.3	9.1
Total (N)	44	22

F2c: Good communication between faculty in my dept	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	31.3	28.0
3: Agree (%)	62.5	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	4.2	32.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.1	.
Total (N)	48	25

F2d: Good communication between my dept and other depts	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	14.9	4.3
3: Agree (%)	61.7	65.2
2: Disagree (%)	19.1	30.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.3	.
Total (N)	47	23

F2e: Good communication between my college and other colleges	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	5.9	.
3: Agree (%)	58.8	46.7
2: Disagree (%)	17.6	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	17.6	20.0
Total (N)	34	15

F3: Dept environ promotes respectful dialogue between diverse perspectives	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	56.3	28.0
3: Agree (%)	39.6	48.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	16.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.2	8.0
Total (N)	48	25

F4a: Frequency given/recvd teaching advice in dept past few years	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.2
Frequently (%)	22.9	44.0
Sometimes (%)	52.1	40.0
Seldom (%)	16.7	8.0
Never (%)	8.3	8.0
Total (N)	48	25

F4b: Frequency given/recvd research/artistic feedback in dept past few yrs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.4
Frequently (%)	52.1	48.0
Sometimes (%)	31.3	44.0
Seldom (%)	12.5	4.0
Never (%)	4.2	4.0
Total (N)	48	25

F4c: Frequency given/recvd help with dept/college bureaucracy past few yrs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.0
Frequently (%)	39.6	28.0
Sometimes (%)	37.5	44.0
Seldom (%)	20.8	24.0
Never (%)	2.1	4.0
Total (N)	48	25

F4d: Frequency given/recvd help undrsnd reappointment, promotion, tenure past few yrs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.0
Frequently (%)	37.5	24.0
Sometimes (%)	47.9	60.0
Seldom (%)	12.5	12.0
Never (%)	2.1	4.0
Total (N)	48	25

F4e: Frequency given/recvd help with work/personal balance issues past few yrs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.4
Frequently (%)	14.6	16.0
Sometimes (%)	33.3	24.0
Seldom (%)	39.6	40.0
Never (%)	12.5	20.0
Total (N)	48	25

F5a: Frequency of collab with faculty in your dept	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.7	3.6
Frequently (%)	70.8	68.0
Sometimes (%)	25.0	28.0
Seldom (%)	4.2	4.0
Total (N)	48	25

F5b: Frequency of collab with faculty in other NCSU depts	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.0
Frequently (%)	41.7	36.0
Sometimes (%)	41.7	36.0
Seldom (%)	8.3	20.0
Never (%)	8.3	8.0
Total (N)	48	25

F5c: Frequency of collab with faculty from other universities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.1
Frequently (%)	29.2	44.0
Sometimes (%)	45.8	36.0
Seldom (%)	20.8	8.0
Never (%)	4.2	12.0
Total (N)	48	25

F5d: Frequency of collab with non-faculty external to NCSU	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.5
Frequently (%)	22.9	20.0
Sometimes (%)	39.6	40.0
Seldom (%)	22.9	8.0
Never (%)	14.6	32.0
Total (N)	48	25

Section G: Faculty Support & Professional Development

G1a: Satisfaction with level of courses	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	46.5	56.0
3: Satisfied (%)	51.2	40.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	2.3	4.0
Total (N)	43	25

G1b: Satisfaction with number of courses	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	31.8	52.0
3: Satisfied (%)	65.9	36.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	2.3	12.0
Total (N)	44	25

G1c: Satisfaction with choice in courses	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	42.2	36.0
3: Satisfied (%)	48.9	64.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	6.7	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.2	.
Total (N)	45	25

G1d: Satisfaction with course content discretion	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	3.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	66.7	60.0
3: Satisfied (%)	28.9	40.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	4.4	.
Total (N)	45	25

G1e: Satisfaction with number of students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	37.8	36.0
3: Satisfied (%)	57.8	56.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	4.4	8.0
Total (N)	45	25

G1f: Satisfaction with quality of undergraduates	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	17.6	66.7
3: Satisfied (%)	58.8	.
2: Dissatisfied (%)	23.5	33.3
Total (N)	17	3

G1g: Satisfaction with quality of graduate students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	18.2	16.0
3: Satisfied (%)	65.9	72.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	15.9	12.0
Total (N)	44	25

G1h: Satisfaction with access to grad TAs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.9	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	12.5
3: Satisfied (%)	31.6	37.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	31.6	37.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	36.8	12.5
Total (N)	19	8

G1i: Satisfaction with access to grad RAs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.0	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	3.8	9.1
3: Satisfied (%)	26.9	36.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	30.8	45.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	38.5	9.1
Total (N)	26	11

G2a: NCSU supports innovative teaching	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	33.3	40.9
3: Agree (%)	55.6	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	6.7	4.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.4	4.5
Total (N)	45	22

G2b: NCSU supports innovative research and scholarly activity	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	41.3	37.5
3: Agree (%)	52.2	41.7
2: Disagree (%)	4.3	20.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.2	.
Total (N)	46	24

G2c: NCSU supports innovative creative artistry and literature	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	14.3	40.0
3: Agree (%)	71.4	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	14.3	.
Total (N)	7	5

G2d: NCSU supports innovative extension/engagement/econ dev activity	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	28.6	43.8
3: Agree (%)	60.0	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	8.6	6.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.9	.
Total (N)	35	16

G3a: NCSU rewards innovative teaching	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	17.8	25.0
3: Agree (%)	51.1	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	24.4	37.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.7	4.2
Total (N)	45	24

G3b: NCSU rewards innovative research and scholarly activity	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	44.7	45.8
3: Agree (%)	40.4	41.7
2: Disagree (%)	12.8	12.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.1	.
Total (N)	47	24

G3c: NCSU rewards innovative creative artistry and literature	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	33.3
3: Agree (%)	83.3	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	16.7	.
Total (N)	6	3

G3d: NCSU rewards innovative extension/engagement/econ dev activity	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	13.3	21.4
3: Agree (%)	66.7	64.3
2: Disagree (%)	16.7	14.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.3	.
Total (N)	30	14

G4a: Satisfaction: Availability of classroom technology	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	23.3	16.0
3: Satisfied (%)	58.1	60.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	14.0	24.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	4.7	.
Total (N)	43	25

G4b: Satisfaction: Teaching reduction for scholarly/prof growth	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	12.9	10.5
3: Satisfied (%)	45.2	42.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	19.4	42.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	22.6	5.3
Total (N)	31	19

G4c: Satisfaction: Teaching workshop/seminar opportunities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	9.8	13.0
3: Satisfied (%)	75.6	73.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	12.2	13.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.4	.
Total (N)	41	23

G4d: Satisfaction: Avail of funds to attend teaching conference/wrkshp	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	12.9	10.0
3: Satisfied (%)	35.5	45.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	35.5	25.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	16.1	20.0
Total (N)	31	20

G4e: Satisfaction: Learning technology training/support	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	7.9	14.3
3: Satisfied (%)	55.3	71.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	31.6	14.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.3	.
Total (N)	38	21

G4f: Satisfaction: Campus bookstore meeting course needs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	22.2	20.0
3: Satisfied (%)	55.6	80.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	5.6	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	16.7	.
Total (N)	18	5

G4g: Satisfaction: Availability of funds to present work	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	9.1	4.3
3: Satisfied (%)	38.6	56.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	43.2	17.4
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	9.1	21.7
Total (N)	44	23

G4h: Satisfaction: Opportunities for scholarly/professional leave	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	13.2	11.1
3: Satisfied (%)	52.6	61.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	18.4	22.2
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	15.8	5.6
Total (N)	38	18

G4i: Satisfaction: Financial support for scholarly/professional leave	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	15.4	7.1
3: Satisfied (%)	30.8	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	35.9	28.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	17.9	14.3
Total (N)	39	14

G4j: Satisfaction: Leadership development opportunities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	7.4	14.3
3: Satisfied (%)	55.6	57.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	29.6	21.4
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	7.4	7.1
Total (N)	27	14

G4k: Satisfaction: Support for dept assessment Activities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	15.6	7.1
3: Satisfied (%)	56.3	57.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	18.8	21.4
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	9.4	14.3
Total (N)	32	14

G4l: Satisfaction: Availability of/access to materials via NCSU Libraries	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	34.1	20.0
3: Satisfied (%)	54.5	60.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	11.4	12.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	8.0
Total (N)	44	25

G4m: Satisfaction: Support with dealing with student concerns	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	15.8	16.7
3: Satisfied (%)	73.7	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	5.3	16.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.3	.
Total (N)	38	18

G4n: Satisfaction: Support for technology transfer	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	11.1	.
3: Satisfied (%)	61.1	57.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	11.1	28.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	16.7	14.3
Total (N)	36	14

G5: Assignment of formal mentor	Male	Female
Yes (%)	25.5	40.0
No (%)	74.5	60.0
Total (N)	47	25

G6: Mentor helpfulness	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	2.9
4: Very helpful (%)	66.7	30.0
3: Somewhat helpful (%)	8.3	40.0
2: Not very helpful (%)	16.7	20.0
1: Not at all helpful (%)	8.3	10.0
Total (N)	12	10

G7a: Satisfaction: Pre-award support from college for grant/contract	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	10.5	26.3
3: Satisfied (%)	68.4	42.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	15.8	21.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.3	10.5
Total (N)	38	19

G7b: Satisfaction: Post-award support from college for grant/contract	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	8.3	16.7
3: Satisfied (%)	61.1	61.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	27.8	16.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.8	5.6
Total (N)	36	18

G7c: Satisfaction: Pre-award University support for grant/contract	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	5.7	.
3: Satisfied (%)	54.3	60.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	28.6	26.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	11.4	13.3
Total (N)	35	15

G7d: Satisfaction: Post-award University support for grant/contract	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	5.7	.
3: Satisfied (%)	54.3	42.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	22.9	35.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	17.1	21.4
Total (N)	35	14

G7e: Satisfaction: Allocation of indirect grant costs to investigator	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	2.6	.
3: Satisfied (%)	47.4	47.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	34.2	29.4
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	15.8	23.5
Total (N)	38	17

G7f: Satisfaction: Allocation of indirect grant costs to department	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	5.7	.
3: Satisfied (%)	34.3	31.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	48.6	43.8
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	11.4	25.0
Total (N)	35	16

G7g: Satisfaction: PI control over indirect cost allocation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.2	2.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	2.7	.
3: Satisfied (%)	35.1	36.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	40.5	31.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	21.6	31.6
Total (N)	37	19

Section H: Performance Review, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure

H1: Faculty performance review standards are clearly stated	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	55.6	52.0
3: Agree (%)	37.8	24.0
2: Disagree (%)	4.4	16.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.2	8.0
Total (N)	45	25

H2: Faculty performance review procedures are clearly stated	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	55.6	48.0
3: Agree (%)	42.2	32.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	12.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.2	8.0
Total (N)	45	25

H3: SME is consistent with departmental vision	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	44.4	27.3
3: Agree (%)	55.6	59.1
2: Disagree (%)	.	9.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	4.5
Total (N)	45	22

H4: SME is consistent with departmental promotion standards	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	46.7	45.0
3: Agree (%)	48.9	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	4.4	10.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	5.0
Total (N)	45	20

H5a: Performance Review feedback appropriately based on SME	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	45.5	36.4
3: Agree (%)	45.5	54.5
2: Disagree (%)	6.8	9.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.3	.
Total (N)	44	22

H5b: Performance Review feedback helpful for professional Development	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	30.2	25.0
3: Agree (%)	53.5	58.3
2: Disagree (%)	11.6	12.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.7	4.2
Total (N)	43	24

H5c: Performance Review feedback corresponds with my perceptions of own performance	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	51.1	20.8
3: Agree (%)	40.0	62.5
2: Disagree (%)	4.4	8.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.4	8.3
Total (N)	45	24

H5d: Performance Review feedback helps understand relation to other faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	24.4	20.8
3: Agree (%)	37.8	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	31.1	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.7	12.5
Total (N)	45	24

H5e: Feedback given appropriate weight in merit raises	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	27.3	29.2
3: Agree (%)	54.5	45.8
2: Disagree (%)	9.1	12.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.1	12.5
Total (N)	44	24

H6: Understanding of current Academic Tenure Policy	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	2.9
4: Very well (%)	32.6	25.0
3: Fairly well (%)	50.0	41.7
2: Not very well (%)	15.2	33.3
1: Not at all (%)	2.2	.
Total (N)	46	24

H7_1: Participated in RPT process as candidate	Male	Female
No (%)	39.1	12.0
Yes (%)	60.9	88.0
Total (N)	46	25

H7_2: Participated in RPT process as voter	Male	Female
No (%)	30.4	40.0
Yes (%)	69.6	60.0
Total (N)	46	25

H7_3: Participated in RPT process as review committee member	Male	Female
No (%)	43.5	76.0
Yes (%)	56.5	24.0
Total (N)	46	25

H7_4: Have never participated in RPT process	Male	Female
No (%)	82.6	88.0
Yes (%)	17.4	12.0
Total (N)	46	25

H8: Understand dept RPT standards	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.2
4: Very well (%)	54.3	44.0
3: Fairly well (%)	32.6	32.0
2: Not very well (%)	13.0	24.0
Total (N)	46	25

H9: Understand dept RPT procedures	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.2
4: Very well (%)	54.3	48.0
3: Fairly well (%)	37.0	28.0
2: Not very well (%)	8.7	20.0
1: Not at all (%)	.	4.0
Total (N)	46	25

H10: Departmental RPT standards applied consistently/fairly	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	54.8	42.9
3: Agree (%)	35.7	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	7.1	9.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.4	14.3
Total (N)	42	21

H11: Departmental RPT procedures applied consistently/fairly	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	52.5	42.9
3: Agree (%)	42.5	42.9
2: Disagree (%)	2.5	4.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.5	9.5
Total (N)	40	21

H12a: Sufficient resources for teaching/mentoring students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	14.3	4.3
3: Agree (%)	66.7	65.2
2: Disagree (%)	14.3	17.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.8	13.0
Total (N)	42	23

H12b: Sufficient resources for discovery of knowledge	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	12.2	.
3: Agree (%)	61.0	59.1
2: Disagree (%)	22.0	22.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.9	18.2
Total (N)	41	22

H12c: Sufficient resources for creative artistry and literature	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	20.0	.
3: Agree (%)	40.0	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	20.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	20.0	.
Total (N)	5	2

H12d: Sufficient resources for tech/managerial innovation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	14.3	.
3: Agree (%)	47.6	61.5
2: Disagree (%)	19.0	23.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	19.0	15.4
Total (N)	21	13

H12e: Sufficient resources for extension/engagement	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	6.5	.
3: Agree (%)	61.3	71.4
2: Disagree (%)	25.8	21.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.5	7.1
Total (N)	31	14

H12f: Sufficient resources for professional service	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	15.4	.
3: Agree (%)	53.8	65.2
2: Disagree (%)	25.6	30.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.1	4.3
Total (N)	39	23

H13a: Department rewards teaching/mentoring of students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	22.7	17.4
3: Agree (%)	52.3	47.8
2: Disagree (%)	22.7	26.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.3	8.7
Total (N)	44	23

H13b: Department rewards discovery of knowledge	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	53.5	60.9
3: Agree (%)	41.9	34.8
2: Disagree (%)	4.7	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	4.3
Total (N)	43	23

H13c: Department rewards creative artistry and literature	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	4.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	16.7	100.0
3: Agree (%)	50.0	.
2: Disagree (%)	16.7	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	16.7	.
Total (N)	6	2

H13d: Department rewards tech/managerial innovation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	14.8	36.4
3: Agree (%)	55.6	54.5
2: Disagree (%)	22.2	9.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.4	.
Total (N)	27	11

H13e: Department rewards extension/engagement	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	29.7	23.5
3: Agree (%)	56.8	47.1
2: Disagree (%)	13.5	17.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	11.8
Total (N)	37	17

H13f: Department rewards professional service	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	17.1	13.6
3: Agree (%)	58.5	63.6
2: Disagree (%)	19.5	18.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.9	4.5
Total (N)	41	22

Section I: Post-Tenure Review

I1_1: No experience with PTR	Male	Female
Has experience (%)	69.6	52.0
No experience (%)	30.4	48.0
Total (N)	46	25

I1_2: Have had PTR Comprehensive Review	Male	Female
No (%)	37.0	48.0
Yes (%)	63.0	52.0
Total (N)	46	25

I1_3: Have served on PTR committee	Male	Female
No (%)	56.5	76.0
Yes (%)	43.5	24.0
Total (N)	46	25

I1_4: Have been dept/college administrator in PTR process	Male	Female
No (%)	91.3	96.0
Yes (%)	8.7	4.0
Total (N)	46	25

I1_5: Had other PTR experience	Male	Female
No (%)	91.3	100.0
Yes (%)	8.7	.
Total (N)	46	25

I2a: Easy to find PTR information on NCSU website	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	28.9	16.7
3: Agree (%)	47.4	75.0
2: Disagree (%)	23.7	8.3
Total (N)	38	12

I2b: PTR process known/understood in department	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	26.3	31.6
3: Agree (%)	39.5	42.1
2: Disagree (%)	31.6	21.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.6	5.3
Total (N)	38	19

I2c: Departmental PTR procedures are clear	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	26.3	35.3
3: Agree (%)	60.5	41.2
2: Disagree (%)	10.5	17.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.6	5.9
Total (N)	38	17

I2d: Departmental PTR standards are clear	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	27.8	31.6
3: Agree (%)	55.6	42.1
2: Disagree (%)	13.9	15.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.8	10.5
Total (N)	36	19

I2e: Departmental PTR procedures are followed equitably	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	35.3	46.7
3: Agree (%)	50.0	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	11.8	6.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.9	13.3
Total (N)	34	15

I2f: Departmental PTR standards are applied fairly	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	36.1	40.0
3: Agree (%)	50.0	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	11.1	13.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.8	13.3
Total (N)	36	15

I2g: Dept PTR committee members are well prepared and trained	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	19.4	33.3
3: Agree (%)	61.3	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	16.1	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.2	6.7
Total (N)	31	15

I3: Overall satisfaction with PTR process	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	14.7	29.4
3: Satisfied (%)	58.8	41.2
2: Dissatisfied (%)	14.7	17.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	11.8	11.8
Total (N)	34	17

Section J: Pay and Compensation

J1a: My salary is competitive within my department	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	28.2	10.0
3: Agree (%)	48.7	55.0
2: Disagree (%)	15.4	15.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.7	20.0
Total (N)	39	20

J1b: My salary is competitive within my college	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	29.7	11.1
3: Agree (%)	32.4	44.4
2: Disagree (%)	24.3	22.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	13.5	22.2
Total (N)	37	18

J1c: My salary is competitive within NC State	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	42.4	16.7
3: Agree (%)	39.4	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	6.1	41.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	12.1	8.3
Total (N)	33	12

J1d: My salary is competitive within UNC system	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	18.5	.
3: Agree (%)	25.9	37.5
2: Disagree (%)	25.9	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	29.6	37.5
Total (N)	27	8

J1e: My salary is competitive within discipline at comparable institutions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.1	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.3	.
3: Agree (%)	17.9	25.0
2: Disagree (%)	41.0	45.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	30.8	30.0
Total (N)	39	20

J2: Understand how faculty salaries determined	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.2
4: Very well (%)	32.6	4.0
3: Fairly well (%)	41.3	40.0
2: Not very well (%)	10.9	28.0
1: Not at all (%)	15.2	28.0
Total (N)	46	25

J3: My department links salary increase to meritorious performance	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	35.7	12.5
3: Agree (%)	42.9	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	16.7	16.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.8	4.2
Total (N)	42	24

J4: I have access to benefits information	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	41.3	50.0
3: Agree (%)	47.8	41.7
2: Disagree (%)	8.7	8.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.2	.
Total (N)	46	24

J5: Healthcare benefits are competitive with other institutions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.8	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	7.3	.
3: Agree (%)	14.6	56.5
2: Disagree (%)	29.3	26.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	48.8	17.4
Total (N)	41	23

J6: Retirement programs are competitive with other institutions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.0	4.5
3: Agree (%)	42.5	72.7
2: Disagree (%)	27.5	13.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	20.0	9.1
Total (N)	40	22

J7: Voluntary benefits programs are competitive with other institutions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	13.3	6.3
3: Agree (%)	56.7	75.0
2: Disagree (%)	16.7	12.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	13.3	6.3
Total (N)	30	16

J8: I am satisfied with my compensation at NC State	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.9	.
3: Agree (%)	39.1	48.0
2: Disagree (%)	39.1	44.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	10.9	8.0
Total (N)	46	25

J9: Departmental environment enables work/personal life balance	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	19.6	4.0
3: Agree (%)	56.5	56.0
2: Disagree (%)	21.7	36.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.2	4.0
Total (N)	46	25

J10: NCSU environment enables work/personal life balance	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	17.4	.
3: Agree (%)	60.9	65.2
2: Disagree (%)	19.6	26.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.2	8.7
Total (N)	46	23

J11a: Importance of flexible work hours	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.7	3.6
4: Very important (%)	73.9	64.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	26.1	32.0
2: Not very important (%)	.	4.0
Total (N)	46	25

J11b: Importance of maternity/paternity leave	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.8	3.8
4: Very important (%)	78.3	80.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	19.6	20.0
2: Not very important (%)	2.2	.
Total (N)	46	25

J11c: Importance of family leave time	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.7	3.8
4: Very important (%)	71.7	76.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	28.3	24.0
Total (N)	46	25

J11d: Importance of altering tenure clock for family concerns	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.8	3.8
4: Very important (%)	78.3	84.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	21.7	12.0
2: Not very important (%)	.	4.0
Total (N)	46	25

J11e: Importance of childcare facility on or near campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.4
4: Very important (%)	50.0	48.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	39.1	40.0
2: Not very important (%)	10.9	12.0
Total (N)	46	25

J11f: Importance of tuition remission for dependents	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.7	3.5
4: Very important (%)	73.9	60.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	17.4	32.0
2: Not very important (%)	8.7	8.0
Total (N)	46	25

Section K: Campus Infrastructure/Physical Environment

K1: I have sufficient clerical/admin support in my dept	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	19.6	16.0
3: Agree (%)	50.0	52.0
2: Disagree (%)	19.6	24.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	10.9	8.0
Total (N)	46	25

K2: I have sufficient tech assistance	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	17.8	4.0
3: Agree (%)	28.9	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	42.2	32.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	11.1	4.0
Total (N)	45	25

K3: There is sufficient support staff in my college	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	19.6	4.0
3: Agree (%)	47.8	48.0
2: Disagree (%)	26.1	44.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.5	4.0
Total (N)	46	25

K4a: Satisfaction with office space	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	41.3	44.0
3: Satisfied (%)	41.3	44.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	13.0	12.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	4.3	.
Total (N)	46	25

K4b: Satisfaction with lab space	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	22.2	25.0
3: Satisfied (%)	41.7	65.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	33.3	5.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.8	5.0
Total (N)	36	20

K4c: Satisfaction with classrooms in which you teach	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	20.0	12.0
3: Satisfied (%)	57.8	80.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	20.0	8.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.2	.
Total (N)	45	25

K4d: Satisfaction with labs in which you teach	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	16.1	11.1
3: Satisfied (%)	71.0	72.2
2: Dissatisfied (%)	12.9	16.7
Total (N)	31	18

K4e: Satisfaction with maintenance of building in which you work	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	10.9	4.0
3: Satisfied (%)	56.5	52.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	17.4	36.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	15.2	8.0
Total (N)	46	25

K4f: Satisfaction with infrastructure of bldgs in which you work	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	13.0	12.0
3: Satisfied (%)	43.5	40.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	28.3	36.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	15.2	12.0
Total (N)	46	25

K4g: Satisfaction with availability of up-to-date equipment	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	17.4	8.0
3: Satisfied (%)	58.7	64.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	19.6	24.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	4.3	4.0
Total (N)	46	25

K4h: Satisfaction with availability of office supplies	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	20.0	8.0
3: Satisfied (%)	46.7	56.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	24.4	20.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	8.9	16.0
Total (N)	45	25

K4i: Satisfaction with availability of informal meeting space	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	19.6	4.2
3: Satisfied (%)	30.4	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	37.0	41.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	13.0	4.2
Total (N)	46	24

K4j: Satisfaction with dining options on campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	7.1	.
3: Satisfied (%)	32.1	76.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	42.9	15.4
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	17.9	7.7
Total (N)	28	13

K4k: Satisfaction with availability of parking	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	2.2	4.2
3: Satisfied (%)	65.2	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	17.4	16.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	15.2	12.5
Total (N)	46	24

K4l: Satisfaction with cost of parking	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.0	2.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	2.2	4.0
3: Satisfied (%)	23.9	36.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	47.8	40.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	26.1	20.0
Total (N)	46	25

K4m: Satisfaction with Wolfline	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	25.0	.
3: Satisfied (%)	62.5	75.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	6.3	25.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.3	.
Total (N)	16	4

K4n: Satisfaction with commute between Centennial and main	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	21.1	.
3: Satisfied (%)	63.2	80.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	15.8	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	20.0
Total (N)	19	5

K4o: Satisfaction with campus safety	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	7.7	.
3: Satisfied (%)	82.1	90.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	7.7	4.8
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.6	4.8
Total (N)	39	21

K4p: Satisfaction with campus aesthetics	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	2.3	4.2
3: Satisfied (%)	67.4	79.2
2: Dissatisfied (%)	18.6	12.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	11.6	4.2
Total (N)	43	24

K4q: Satisfaction with upkeep of campus grounds	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	7.0	4.2
3: Satisfied (%)	76.7	91.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	11.6	4.2
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	4.7	.
Total (N)	43	24

K4r: Satisfaction with amount of green space	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	4.8	8.7
3: Satisfied (%)	52.4	73.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	33.3	17.4
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	9.5	.
Total (N)	42	23

K5a: Satisfaction with energy conservation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	3.1	.
3: Satisfied (%)	40.6	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	40.6	43.8
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	15.6	6.3
Total (N)	32	16

K5b: Satisfaction with water conservation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	3.2	.
3: Satisfied (%)	48.4	47.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	32.3	47.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	16.1	5.9
Total (N)	31	17

K5c: Satisfaction with recycling efforts	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	9.5	17.4
3: Satisfied (%)	66.7	69.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	21.4	13.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.4	.
Total (N)	42	23

K5d: Satisfaction with alternative transportation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	2.8	.
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	58.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	30.6	41.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	16.7	.
Total (N)	36	12

K5e: Satisfaction with green building practices	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.8
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	75.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	26.9	25.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	23.1	.
Total (N)	26	8

K5f: Satisfaction with use of recycled-content resources	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	12.5
3: Satisfied (%)	56.5	62.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	34.8	25.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	8.7	.
Total (N)	23	8

K6: Interest in hotel/conference center on Centennial Campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.4
4: A lot (%)	34.8	24.0
3: Some (%)	32.6	24.0
2: A little (%)	13.0	24.0
1: None at all (%)	19.6	28.0
Total (N)	46	25

K7: Likelihood of using conference center on Centennial Campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	2.6
4: Very likely (%)	41.3	20.0
3: Somewhat likely (%)	32.6	32.0
2: Not very likely (%)	17.4	36.0
1: Not at all likely (%)	8.7	12.0
Total (N)	46	25

Section L: Recreation/Wellness

L1: Satisfaction with recreation activities on campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	10.9	4.3
3: Satisfied (%)	69.6	69.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	15.2	26.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	4.3	.
Total (N)	46	23

L2: Satisfaction with cultural activities on campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	4.3	4.3
3: Satisfied (%)	76.1	82.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	15.2	13.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	4.3	.
Total (N)	46	23

L3a: Satisfaction with Carmichael Gymnasium	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	20.0	.
3: Satisfied (%)	53.3	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	20.0	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.7	.
Total (N)	30	12

L3b: Satisfaction with recreation space around campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	17.2	.
3: Satisfied (%)	55.2	71.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	20.7	28.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.9	.
Total (N)	29	7

L3c: Satisfaction with organized Campus Recreation Activities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	7.1	.
3: Satisfied (%)	57.1	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	21.4	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	14.3	.
Total (N)	14	4

L3d: Satisfaction with ARTS NC State programs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	9.1	10.0
3: Satisfied (%)	63.6	80.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	27.3	10.0
Total (N)	22	10

L3e: Satisfaction with Wolfpack athletic events	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	26.9	.
3: Satisfied (%)	73.1	100.0
Total (N)	26	8

L4a: How often use Carmichael Gymnasium	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.0
Once a week or more (%)	21.7	.
A few times a month (%)	6.5	4.0
A few times a semester (%)	15.2	20.0
Once a semester (%)	6.5	8.0
Once a year (%)	2.2	4.0
Never (%)	47.8	64.0
Total (N)	46	25

L4b: How often use recreational space around campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	1.7
Once a week or more (%)	13.6	.
A few times a month (%)	2.3	.
A few times a semester (%)	15.9	20.0
Once a semester (%)	6.8	4.0
Once a year (%)	20.5	.
Never (%)	40.9	76.0
Total (N)	44	25

L4c: How often participate in organized Campus Recreation Activities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.6	1.2
Once a week or more (%)	4.4	.
A few times a month (%)	4.4	.
A few times a semester (%)	2.2	4.0
Once a semester (%)	2.2	.
Once a year (%)	11.1	4.0
Never (%)	75.6	92.0
Total (N)	45	25

L4d: How often attend ARTS NC State programs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.2	2.0
A few times a month (%)	4.3	.
A few times a semester (%)	19.6	16.7
Once a semester (%)	13.0	20.8
Once a year (%)	17.4	12.5
Never (%)	45.7	50.0
Total (N)	46	24

L4e: How often attend Wolfpack athletic events	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	1.6
Once a week or more (%)	2.2	.
A few times a month (%)	13.0	.
A few times a semester (%)	19.6	4.0
Once a semester (%)	15.2	16.0
Once a year (%)	13.0	16.0
Never (%)	37.0	64.0
Total (N)	46	25

L5: Interest in designated faculty-only dining facility	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.8	1.3
4: A great deal (%)	10.9	4.0
3: Some (%)	19.6	4.0
2: A little (%)	10.9	12.0
1: None at all (%)	58.7	80.0
Total (N)	46	25

L6: Likelihood of using gym on Centennial campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.8	1.5
4: Very likely (%)	8.7	12.0
3: Somewhat likely (%)	15.2	.
2: Not very likely (%)	21.7	16.0
1: Not at all likely (%)	54.3	72.0
Total (N)	46	25

Section M: Work Activities

M1: Total hours per week spent performing job-related work (collapsed)	Male	Female
Mean # Hrs Work	57.0	54.5
more than 60 hrs (%)	17.4	8.0
51 to 60 hrs (%)	54.3	48.0
41 to 50 hrs (%)	21.7	40.0
40 hrs or less (%)	6.5	4.0
Total (N)	46	25

M2A: Proportion of total hours spent on teaching/mentoring	Male	Female
Mean % of Time on Activity	33.1	40.6
more than 50% of time (%)	6.5	28.0
26% to 50% of time (%)	54.3	48.0
11% to 25% of time (%)	28.3	20.0
6% to 10% of time (%)	10.9	4.0
Total (N)	46	25

M2a_1r: Includes teaching (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	Male	Female
No (%)	13.0	8.0
Yes (%)	87.0	92.0
Total (N)	46	25

M2a_2r: Includes professional development to improve teaching (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	Male	Female
No (%)	54.3	52.0
Yes (%)	45.7	48.0
Total (N)	46	25

M2a_3r: Includes research projects with students (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	Male	Female
No (%)	39.1	32.0
Yes (%)	60.9	68.0
Total (N)	46	25

M2a_4r: Includes supervising internships/field experiences (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	Male	Female
No (%)	54.3	52.0
Yes (%)	45.7	48.0
Total (N)	46	25

M2a_5r: Includes student thesis/dissertation committee work (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	Male	Female
No (%)	39.1	52.0
Yes (%)	60.9	48.0
Total (N)	46	25

M2B: Proportion of total hours spent advising students	Male	Female
Mean % of Time on Activity	4.7	4.2
11% to 25% of time (%)	2.2	.
6% to 10% of time (%)	17.4	20.0
1% to 5% of time (%)	58.7	60.0
0% of time (%)	21.7	20.0
Total (N)	46	25

M2b_1r: Includes formal advising (among those reporting time spent on advising)	Male	Female
No (%)	27.8	30.0
Yes (%)	72.2	70.0
Total (N)	36	20

M2b_2r: Includes informal advising (among those reporting time spent on advising)	Male	Female
No (%)	22.2	30.0
Yes (%)	77.8	70.0
Total (N)	36	20

M2C: Proportion of total hours spent on research/scholarly Activities	Male	Female
Mean % of Time on Activity	32.2	27.5
more than 50% of time (%)	15.2	12.0
26% to 50% of time (%)	43.5	44.0
11% to 25% of time (%)	23.9	16.0
6% to 10% of time (%)	8.7	12.0
1% to 5% of time (%)	6.5	16.0
0% of time (%)	2.2	.
Total (N)	46	25

M2D: Proportion of total hours spent on creative artistry/literature	Male	Female
Mean % of Time on Activity	0.3	0.0
1% to 5% of time (%)	6.5	.
0% of time (%)	93.5	100.0
Total (N)	46	25

M2E: Proportion of total hours spent on extension/engagement/econ dev	Male	Female
Mean % of Time on Activity	7.2	5.2
26% to 50% of time (%)	6.5	4.0
11% to 25% of time (%)	13.0	16.0
6% to 10% of time (%)	10.9	8.0
1% to 5% of time (%)	28.3	16.0
0% of time (%)	41.3	56.0
Total (N)	46	25

M2e_1r: Includes service learning teaching/mentoring (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	Male	Female
No (%)	77.8	45.5
Yes (%)	22.2	54.5
Total (N)	27	11

M2e_2r: Includes extension education/non-credit programs (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	Male	Female
No (%)	51.9	36.4
Yes (%)	48.1	63.6
Total (N)	27	11

M2e_3r: Includes economic development training/tech assistance (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	Male	Female
No (%)	96.3	81.8
Yes (%)	3.7	18.2
Total (N)	27	11

M2e_4r: Includes partnering with private sector - job/investment creation (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	Male	Female
No (%)	85.2	90.9
Yes (%)	14.8	9.1
Total (N)	27	11

M2e_5r: Public service grants/contracts (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	Male	Female
No (%)	88.9	81.8
Yes (%)	11.1	18.2
Total (N)	27	11

M2F: Proportion of total hours spent on service work	Male	Female
Mean % of Time on Activity	15.9	17.3
more than 50% of time (%)	2.2	12.0
26% to 50% of time (%)	13.0	4.0
11% to 25% of time (%)	30.4	16.0
6% to 10% of time (%)	26.1	28.0
1% to 5% of time (%)	26.1	36.0
0% of time (%)	2.2	4.0
Total (N)	46	25

M2f_1r: Includes advising student groups (among those reporting time spent on service work)	Male	Female
No (%)	68.9	70.8
Yes (%)	31.1	29.2
Total (N)	45	24

M2f_2r: Includes dept/college/university committees (among those reporting time spent on service work)	Male	Female
No (%)	26.7	25.0
Yes (%)	73.3	75.0
Total (N)	45	24

M2f_3r: Includes professional service (among those reporting time spent on service work)	Male	Female
No (%)	24.4	37.5
Yes (%)	75.6	62.5
Total (N)	45	24

M2f_4r: Includes academic program assessment activities (among those reporting time spent on service work)	Male	Female
No (%)	73.3	70.8
Yes (%)	26.7	29.2
Total (N)	45	24

M2f_5r: Includes other university service (among those reporting time spent on service work)	Male	Female
No (%)	55.6	83.3
Yes (%)	44.4	16.7
Total (N)	45	24

M2G: Proportion of total hours spent on tech/managerial innovation	Male	Female
Mean % of Time on Activity	1.2	0.0
11% to 25% of time (%)	2.2	.
6% to 10% of time (%)	2.2	.
1% to 5% of time (%)	15.2	.
0% of time (%)	80.4	100.0
Total (N)	46	25

M2H: Proportion of total hours spent on dept/college admin duties	Male	Female
Mean % of Time on Activity	4.3	5.2
26% to 50% of time (%)	2.2	12.0
11% to 25% of time (%)	6.5	.
6% to 10% of time (%)	8.7	.
1% to 5% of time (%)	19.6	12.0
0% of time (%)	63.0	76.0
Total (N)	46	25

M3_1: Worked summer at NCSU without overload pay	Male	Female
No (%)	41.3	60.0
Yes (%)	58.7	40.0
Total (N)	46	25

M3_2: Taught at NCSU on overload basis	Male	Female
No (%)	93.5	100.0
Yes (%)	6.5	.
Total (N)	46	25

M3_3: Taught NCSU distance education class	Male	Female
No (%)	95.7	92.0
Yes (%)	4.3	8.0
Total (N)	46	25

M3_4: Taught for another academic institution	Male	Female
No (%)	71.7	92.0
Yes (%)	28.3	8.0
Total (N)	46	25

M3_5: Did outside consulting/freelance for pay	Male	Female
No (%)	34.8	56.0
Yes (%)	65.2	44.0
Total (N)	46	25

M3_6: Did outside consulting/freelance without pay	Male	Female
No (%)	54.3	72.0
Yes (%)	45.7	28.0
Total (N)	46	25

M3_7: Had other secondary employment	Male	Female
No (%)	91.3	96.0
Yes (%)	8.7	4.0
Total (N)	46	25

M4: Frequency of volunteer work past 2 years	Male	Female
Never (%)	17.4	12.0
A few times (%)	47.8	52.0
About once per month (%)	17.4	20.0
Two or three times per month (%)	8.7	12.0
At least once per week (%)	8.7	4.0
Total (N)	46	25

M5: Frequency of public policy work past 5 years	Male	Female
Never (%)	56.5	72.0
Once or twice (%)	17.4	4.0
Three to five times (%)	13.0	8.0
Six to ten times (%)	6.5	4.0
More than 10 times (%)	6.5	12.0
Total (N)	46	25

M6: Management of work-related demands of past 2 years	Male	Female
1: Managing everything just fine (%)	6.5	.
2 (%)	13.0	32.0
3 (%)	39.1	24.0
4 (%)	34.8	24.0
5: Completely overwhelmed (%)	6.5	20.0
Total (N)	46	25

M7: Change how you spend your work time	Male	Female
I would change how I spent time (%)	78.6	63.6
I would not change a thing (%)	21.4	36.4
Total (N)	42	22

Section N: Conclusions/Overall Satisfaction

N1: Satisfaction with your "fit" in department	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	42.2	20.0
3: Satisfied (%)	42.2	52.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	13.3	24.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.2	4.0
Total (N)	45	25

N2: I generally feel valued in my department	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	51.1	36.0
3: Agree (%)	37.8	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	8.9	16.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.2	8.0
Total (N)	45	25

N3a: I am treated with respect by my students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	57.8	48.0
3: Agree (%)	37.8	52.0
2: Disagree (%)	4.4	.
Total (N)	45	25

N3b: I am treated with respect by dept support staff	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.7	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	73.3	56.0
3: Agree (%)	26.7	28.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	8.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	8.0
Total (N)	45	25

N3c: I am treated with respect faculty in my dept	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	57.8	56.0
3: Agree (%)	40.0	24.0
2: Disagree (%)	2.2	20.0
Total (N)	45	25

N3d: I am treated with respect by NCSU administrators	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	33.3	33.3
3: Agree (%)	57.8	45.8
2: Disagree (%)	2.2	16.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.7	4.2
Total (N)	45	24

N4: I would recommend my department as a good place to work	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	47.7	32.0
3: Agree (%)	47.7	48.0
2: Disagree (%)	2.3	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.3	.
Total (N)	44	25

N5a: Amount of stress due to reappointment, promotion or tenure	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.7
4: A great deal (%)	11.9	36.4
3: Some (%)	35.7	22.7
2: A little (%)	19.0	18.2
1: None at all (%)	33.3	22.7
Total (N)	42	22

N5b: Amount of stress from research/publication demands	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	3.5
4: A great deal (%)	26.7	64.0
3: Some (%)	42.2	24.0
2: A little (%)	20.0	8.0
1: None at all (%)	11.1	4.0
Total (N)	45	25

N5c: Amount of stress from professional Development	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.8
4: A great deal (%)	15.6	24.0
3: Some (%)	35.6	44.0
2: A little (%)	20.0	16.0
1: None at all (%)	28.9	16.0
Total (N)	45	25

N5d: Amount of stress from institutional procedures	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.6
4: A great deal (%)	15.9	23.8
3: Some (%)	47.7	38.1
2: A little (%)	27.3	9.5
1: None at all (%)	9.1	28.6
Total (N)	44	21

N5e: Amount of stress from committee work	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.0
4: A great deal (%)	16.3	8.3
3: Some (%)	37.2	25.0
2: A little (%)	39.5	29.2
1: None at all (%)	7.0	37.5
Total (N)	43	24

N5f: Amount of stress from relationships with students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.8	1.6
4: A great deal (%)	2.2	4.0
3: Some (%)	13.3	4.0
2: A little (%)	44.4	36.0
1: None at all (%)	40.0	56.0
Total (N)	45	25

N5g: Amount of stress from relationships with faculty in dept	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.9	2.2
4: A great deal (%)	4.5	16.0
3: Some (%)	13.6	20.0
2: A little (%)	45.5	32.0
1: None at all (%)	36.4	32.0
Total (N)	44	25

N5h: Amount of stress from relationships w/dept admin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.5	1.9
4: A great deal (%)	.	4.2
3: Some (%)	11.1	29.2
2: A little (%)	31.1	20.8
1: None at all (%)	57.8	45.8
Total (N)	45	24

N5i: Amount of stress from relationships w/college admin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.0	2.3
4: A great deal (%)	7.0	16.7
3: Some (%)	23.3	29.2
2: A little (%)	34.9	16.7
1: None at all (%)	34.9	37.5
Total (N)	43	24

N5j: Amount of stress from workload	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.4
4: A great deal (%)	46.7	54.2
3: Some (%)	26.7	29.2
2: A little (%)	20.0	16.7
1: None at all (%)	6.7	.
Total (N)	45	24

N5k: Amount of stress from work/personal life balance	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.1
4: A great deal (%)	37.8	44.0
3: Some (%)	33.3	24.0
2: A little (%)	22.2	28.0
1: None at all (%)	6.7	4.0
Total (N)	45	25

N5l: Amount of stress from working with under-prepared students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.4
4: A great deal (%)	11.9	8.3
3: Some (%)	35.7	25.0
2: A little (%)	26.2	62.5
1: None at all (%)	26.2	4.2
Total (N)	42	24

N5m: Amount of stress from self-assessment Activities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.2
4: A great deal (%)	6.7	.
3: Some (%)	40.0	36.0
2: A little (%)	35.6	48.0
1: None at all (%)	17.8	16.0
Total (N)	45	25

N5n: Amount of stress from program assessment requirements	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.1	1.9
4: A great deal (%)	5.3	.
3: Some (%)	28.9	18.2
2: A little (%)	36.8	54.5
1: None at all (%)	28.9	27.3
Total (N)	38	22

N6: Overall satisfaction with NCSU	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	26.7	12.0
3: Satisfied (%)	64.4	64.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	6.7	24.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.2	.
Total (N)	45	25

N7: More or less satisfied with NC State, compared to 5 yrs ago	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.0
A lot more satisfied now (%)	11.1	4.0
Somewhat more satisfied now (%)	35.6	40.0
Neither more or less satisfied now (%)	20.0	20.0
Somewhat less satisfied now (%)	28.9	24.0
A lot less satisfied now (%)	4.4	12.0
Total (N)	45	25

N8: Ever considered leaving NC State for another university	Male	Female
No - never considered leaving (%)	17.8	8.0
Yes - not very seriously (%)	11.1	20.0
Yes - somewhat seriously (%)	28.9	40.0
Yes - very seriously (%)	42.2	32.0
Total (N)	45	25

N10: Ever considered leaving academe, since coming to NC State	Male	Female
No - never considered leaving (%)	37.8	20.0
Yes - not very seriously (%)	33.3	32.0
Yes - somewhat seriously (%)	11.1	20.0
Yes - very seriously (%)	17.8	28.0
Total (N)	45	25

For more information on the NC State University 2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey contact:
Dr. Nancy Whelchel, Associate Director for Survey Research
Office of Institutional Planning and Research
Box 7002
NCSU
Phone: (919) 515-4184
Email: ncsu_surveys@ncsu.edu

Posted: April, 2007