NC State logo

North Carolina State University
2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey
Section F: Working Relationships

College Results
Tenure Track Faculty
(Tenured and Probationary)


The following tables provide results to questions in Section F: Working Relationships, broken down by college for tenure track faculty only. For exact question wording for this section, click here.

Table of Contents | Annotated Questionnaire | College Results for all Faculty


To download a Microsoft Word version of this document (Section F only), click here.

To download a Microsoft Word document with results for all sections of the survey, click here.


F1: There is unity/cohesion among faculty in my department

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)		 3: Agree
(%)
2: Disagree
(%) 		1: Strongly
disagree (%)		 Total (N)
Total (N) 2.9 27.5 42.7 22.1 7.7 885

F1: There is unity/cohesion among faculty in my department Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)		 3: Agree
(%)
2: Disagree
(%) 		1: Strongly
disagree (%)		 Total (N)
College of appointment 3.0 29.4 44.5 19.6 6.5 245
..... CALS
..... CED 2.9 25.0 45.5 22.7 6.8 44
..... CHASS 2.8 27.2 36.7 25.9 10.2 147
..... CNR 3.0 38.0 34.0 22.0 6.0 50
..... COE 2.9 23.9 46.4 23.2 6.5 138
..... COM 2.9 30.2 44.2 14.0 11.6 43
..... COT 2.7 23.1 34.6 26.9 15.4 26
..... CVM 3.0 31.3 45.3 18.8 4.7 64
..... Design 2.8 29.2 37.5 16.7 16.7 24
..... PAMS 2.9 22.7 45.4 26.8 5.2 97
..... Student Affairs 2.6 . 60.0 40.0 . 5
Back to Top

F2a: Good communication between my students and me

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
 3: Agree
(%)

2: Disagree
(%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
 Total (N)
Total (N) 3.5 51.9 47.3 0.6 0.2 864

F2a: Good communication between my students and me Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
 3: Agree
(%)

2: Disagree
(%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
 Total (N)
College of appointment 3.5 53.1 46.1 0.9 . 228
..... CALS
..... CED 3.5 54.5 45.5 . . 44
..... CHASS 3.6 58.1 41.2 0.7 . 148
..... CNR 3.5 48.9 51.1 . . 47
..... COE 3.5 50.7 48.6 0.7 . 138
..... COM 3.4 44.2 55.8 . . 43
..... COT 3.5 46.2 53.8 . . 26
..... CVM 3.3 34.9 61.9 1.6 1.6 63
..... Design 3.7 75.0 20.8 . 4.2 24
..... PAMS 3.5 54.2 45.8 . . 96
..... Student Affairs 3.2 20.0 80.0 . . 5
Back to Top

F2b: Good communication between dept and our students

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
 3: Agree
(%)

2: Disagree
(%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
 Total (N)
Total (N) 3.2 26.7 64.9 7.4 1.1 855

F2b: Good communication between dept and our students Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
 3: Agree
(%)

2: Disagree
(%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
 Total (N)
College of appointment 3.3 33.8 62.0 3.8 0.4 237
..... CALS
..... CED 3.2 29.5 61.4 6.8 2.3 44
..... CHASS 3.1 19.0 70.7 10.2 . 147
..... CNR 3.3 34.9 58.1 7.0 . 43
..... COE 3.1 24.1 65.4 10.5 . 133
..... COM 3.0 23.3 58.1 14.0 4.7 43
..... COT 3.1 15.4 76.9 7.7 . 26
..... CVM 3.0 17.5 66.7 10.5 5.3 57
..... Design 3.3 45.8 45.8 . 8.3 24
..... PAMS 3.2 26.6 68.1 5.3 . 94
..... Student Affairs 3.0 . 100.0 . . 5
Back to Top

F2c: Good communication between faculty in my dept

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
 3: Agree
(%)

2: Disagree
(%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
 Total (N)
Total (N) 3.0 24.3 53.6 18.3 3.8 886

F2c: Good communication between faculty in my dept Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
 3: Agree
(%)

2: Disagree
(%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
 Total (N)
College of appointment 3.0 23.3 55.1 18.8 2.9 245
..... CALS
..... CED 3.0 22.7 61.4 11.4 4.5 44
..... CHASS 2.9 26.8 44.3 22.1 6.7 149
..... CNR 3.0 26.0 56.0 14.0 4.0 50
..... COE 3.0 22.6 55.5 18.2 3.6 137
..... COM 3.1 27.9 58.1 9.3 4.7 43
..... COT 2.8 19.2 50.0 26.9 3.8 26
..... CVM 3.1 29.7 56.3 12.5 1.6 64
..... Design 2.9 25.0 45.8 25.0 4.2 24
..... PAMS 3.0 22.7 55.7 18.6 3.1 97
..... Student Affairs 2.6 . 60.0 40.0 . 5
Back to Top

F2d: Good communication between my dept and other depts

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
 3: Agree
(%)

2: Disagree
(%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
 Total (N)
Total (N) 2.6 8.8 52.6 32.1 6.4 747

F2d: Good communication between my dept and other depts Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
 3: Agree
(%)

2: Disagree
(%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
 Total (N)
College of appointment 2.8 12.8 55.0 27.5 4.6 218
..... CALS
..... CED 2.6 7.3 56.1 29.3 7.3 41
..... CHASS 2.6 5.1 51.7 37.3 5.9 118
..... CNR 2.6 8.9 53.3 28.9 8.9 45
..... COE 2.6 7.9 53.5 32.7 5.9 101
..... COM 2.4 2.4 45.2 38.1 14.3 42
..... COT 2.1 8.3 12.5 62.5 16.7 24
..... CVM 2.8 11.1 63.5 22.2 3.2 63
..... Design 2.5 9.1 31.8 54.5 4.5 22
..... PAMS 2.6 7.2 56.5 29.0 7.2 69
..... Student Affairs 2.7 . 66.7 33.3 . 3
Back to Top

F2e: Good communication between my college and other colleges

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
 3: Agree
(%)

2: Disagree
(%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
 Total (N)
Total (N) 2.5 6.0 49.3 32.3 12.4 533

F2e: Good communication between my college and other colleges Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
 3: Agree
(%)

2: Disagree
(%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
 Total (N)
College of appointment 2.6 6.3 51.4 35.4 6.9 144
..... CALS
..... CED 2.6 6.3 53.1 31.3 9.4 32
..... CHASS 2.1 1.2 36.6 34.1 28.0 82
..... CNR 2.6 8.1 56.8 27.0 8.1 37
..... COE 2.5 4.4 50.0 41.2 4.4 68
..... COM 2.4 3.2 48.4 32.3 16.1 31
..... COT 2.8 17.6 52.9 17.6 11.8 17
..... CVM 2.4 4.4 55.6 20.0 20.0 45
..... Design 2.4 15.8 26.3 42.1 15.8 19
..... PAMS 2.6 9.3 55.6 25.9 9.3 54
..... Student Affairs 2.7 . 66.7 33.3 . 3
Back to Top

F3: Dept environ promotes respectful dialogue between diverse perspectives

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)		 3: Agree
(%)
2: Disagree
(%) 		1: Strongly
disagree (%)		 Total (N)
Total (N) 3.2 36.8 48.3 10.7 4.2 878

F3: Dept environ promotes respectful dialogue between diverse perspectives Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)		 3: Agree
(%)
2: Disagree
(%) 		1: Strongly
disagree (%)		 Total (N)
College of appointment 3.2 36.3 50.8 10.0 2.9 240
..... CALS
..... CED 3.1 25.0 59.1 13.6 2.3 44
..... CHASS 3.1 38.1 43.5 11.6 6.8 147
..... CNR 3.3 42.0 46.0 8.0 4.0 50
..... COE 3.2 34.5 50.4 11.5 3.6 139
..... COM 3.0 23.3 62.8 9.3 4.7 43
..... COT 3.1 38.5 34.6 23.1 3.8 26
..... CVM 3.3 46.9 42.2 4.7 6.3 64
..... Design 3.0 45.8 25.0 16.7 12.5 24
..... PAMS 3.3 38.3 52.1 7.4 2.1 94
..... Student Affairs 3.2 60.0 . 40.0 . 5
Back to Top

F4a: Frequency given/recvd teaching advice in dept past few years

  Mean Rating Frequently
(%)		 Sometimes
(%) 		Seldom (%)
 Never (%)
 Total (N)
Total (N) 3.0 30.8 49.0 12.0 8.2 887

F4a: Frequency given/recvd teaching advice in dept past few years Mean Rating Frequently
(%)		 Sometimes
(%) 		Seldom (%)
 Never (%)
 Total (N)
College of appointment 2.9 26.3 48.6 12.8 12.3 243
..... CALS
..... CED 3.1 40.9 38.6 11.4 9.1 44
..... CHASS 3.2 39.6 46.3 10.7 3.4 149
..... CNR 2.8 26.0 48.0 8.0 18.0 50
..... COE 3.0 27.3 52.5 15.8 4.3 139
..... COM 3.0 27.9 51.2 16.3 4.7 43
..... COT 3.2 42.3 42.3 7.7 7.7 26
..... CVM 3.1 32.8 50.0 10.9 6.3 64
..... Design 2.9 25.0 50.0 12.5 12.5 24
..... PAMS 3.1 30.6 54.1 7.1 8.2 98
..... Student Affairs 3.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 . 5
Back to Top

F4b: Frequency given/recvd research/artistic feedback in dept past few yrs

  Mean Rating Frequently
(%)		 Sometimes
(%) 		Seldom (%)
 Never (%)
 Total (N)
Total (N) 3.2 43.3 40.9 10.4 5.4 886

F4b: Frequency given/recvd research/artistic feedback in dept past few yrs Mean Rating Frequently
(%)		 Sometimes
(%) 		Seldom (%)
 Never (%)
 Total (N)
College of appointment 3.4 49.6 40.2 7.0 3.3 244
..... CALS
..... CED 3.1 40.9 36.4 18.2 4.5 44
..... CHASS 3.2 41.6 40.3 13.4 4.7 149
..... CNR 3.2 44.0 42.0 2.0 12.0 50
..... COE 3.1 38.1 45.3 9.4 7.2 139
..... COM 3.4 51.2 41.9 7.0 . 43
..... COT 3.0 30.8 46.2 19.2 3.8 26
..... CVM 3.4 57.8 31.3 6.3 4.7 64
..... Design 3.0 33.3 37.5 20.8 8.3 24
..... PAMS 3.0 34.4 42.7 14.6 8.3 96
..... Student Affairs 2.4 . 60.0 20.0 20.0 5
Back to Top

F4c: Frequency given/recvd help with dept/college bureaucracy past few yrs

  Mean Rating Frequently
(%)		 Sometimes
(%) 		Seldom (%)
 Never (%)
 Total (N)
Total (N) 3.1 38.1 42.1 15.6 4.2 886

F4c: Frequency given/recvd help with dept/college bureaucracy past few yrs Mean Rating Frequently
(%)		 Sometimes
(%) 		Seldom (%)
 Never (%)
 Total (N)
College of appointment 3.1 35.2 43.4 17.2 4.1 244
..... CALS
..... CED 3.3 52.3 27.3 13.6 6.8 44
..... CHASS 3.4 51.7 36.2 8.1 4.0 149
..... CNR 3.0 36.0 40.0 10.0 14.0 50
..... COE 3.1 29.5 51.8 13.7 5.0 139
..... COM 3.3 43.9 39.0 17.1 . 41
..... COT 3.2 38.5 46.2 15.4 . 26
..... CVM 3.1 40.6 35.9 20.3 3.1 64
..... Design 3.4 45.8 45.8 8.3 . 24
..... PAMS 3.0 27.6 44.9 25.5 2.0 98
..... Student Affairs 2.8 20.0 40.0 40.0 . 5
Back to Top

F4d: Frequency given/recvd help undrsnd reappointment, promotion, tenure past few yrs

  Mean Rating Frequently
(%)		 Sometimes
(%) 		Seldom (%)
 Never (%)
 Total (N)
Total (N) 3.2 40.8 44.9 10.9 3.4 887

F4d: Frequency given/recvd help undrsnd reappointment, promotion, tenure past few yrs Mean Rating Frequently
(%)		 Sometimes
(%) 		Seldom (%)
 Never (%)
 Total (N)
College of appointment 3.3 41.4 45.5 10.7 2.5 244
..... CALS
..... CED 3.2 50.0 27.3 18.2 4.5 44
..... CHASS 3.3 51.0 36.9 7.4 4.7 149
..... CNR 3.1 36.0 48.0 10.0 6.0 50
..... COE 3.2 36.0 53.2 9.4 1.4 139
..... COM 3.2 42.9 40.5 14.3 2.4 42
..... COT 3.3 46.2 42.3 3.8 7.7 26
..... CVM 3.2 37.5 48.4 10.9 3.1 64
..... Design 3.2 54.2 16.7 25.0 4.2 24
..... PAMS 3.1 27.6 55.1 13.3 4.1 98
..... Student Affairs 3.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 . 5
Back to Top

F4e: Frequency given/recvd help with work/personal balance issues past few yrs

  Mean Rating Frequently
(%)		 Sometimes
(%) 		Seldom (%)
 Never (%)
 Total (N)
Total (N) 2.3 12.0 29.4 30.5 28.1 884

F4e: Frequency given/recvd help with work/personal balance issues past few yrs Mean Rating Frequently
(%)		 Sometimes
(%) 		Seldom (%)
 Never (%)
 Total (N)
College of appointment 2.2 11.2 28.1 32.2 28.5 242
..... CALS
..... CED 2.6 22.7 29.5 29.5 18.2 44
..... CHASS 2.3 14.1 27.5 28.9 29.5 149
..... CNR 2.4 12.0 36.0 28.0 24.0 50
..... COE 2.2 8.6 33.8 30.9 26.6 139
..... COM 2.1 7.3 29.3 31.7 31.7 41
..... COT 1.9 11.5 11.5 34.6 42.3 26
..... CVM 2.5 17.2 32.8 34.4 15.6 64
..... Design 2.2 8.3 29.2 33.3 29.2 24
..... PAMS 2.2 11.2 28.6 25.5 34.7 98
..... Student Affairs 1.6 . 20.0 20.0 60.0 5
Back to Top

F5a: Frequency of collab with faculty in your dept

  Mean Rating Frequently
(%)		 Sometimes
(%) 		Seldom (%)
 Never (%)
 Total (N)
Total (N) 3.4 59.3 29.4 7.2 4.1 887

F5a: Frequency of collab with faculty in your dept Mean Rating Frequently
(%)		 Sometimes
(%) 		Seldom (%)
 Never (%)
 Total (N)
College of appointment 3.7 77.5 19.3 1.6 1.6 244
..... CALS
..... CED 3.4 47.7 43.2 9.1 . 44
..... CHASS 2.8 24.2 44.3 18.1 13.4 149
..... CNR 3.7 80.0 14.0 4.0 2.0 50
..... COE 3.6 64.7 28.1 5.8 1.4 139
..... COM 3.2 46.5 34.9 14.0 4.7 43
..... COT 3.6 69.2 23.1 7.7 . 26
..... CVM 3.7 71.9 25.0 3.1 . 64
..... Design 3.3 50.0 37.5 8.3 4.2 24
..... PAMS 3.4 53.6 34.0 7.2 5.2 97
..... Student Affairs 3.4 40.0 60.0 . . 5
Back to Top

F5b: Frequency of collab with faculty in other NCSU depts

  Mean Rating Frequently
(%)		 Sometimes
(%) 		Seldom (%)
 Never (%)
 Total (N)
Total (N) 2.9 37.0 34.0 15.6 13.3 884

F5b: Frequency of collab with faculty in other NCSU depts Mean Rating Frequently
(%)		 Sometimes
(%) 		Seldom (%)
 Never (%)
 Total (N)
College of appointment 3.4 57.2 30.9 10.7 1.2 243
..... CALS
..... CED 2.7 25.0 38.6 20.5 15.9 44
..... CHASS 2.3 13.6 31.3 21.8 33.3 147
..... CNR 3.0 34.0 42.0 18.0 6.0 50
..... COE 3.0 33.1 45.3 12.9 8.6 139
..... COM 2.5 25.6 20.9 27.9 25.6 43
..... COT 3.5 65.4 23.1 3.8 7.7 26
..... CVM 3.2 40.6 42.2 12.5 4.7 64
..... Design 2.7 25.0 37.5 16.7 20.8 24
..... PAMS 2.8 35.1 26.8 16.5 21.6 97
..... Student Affairs 2.2 . 40.0 40.0 20.0 5
Back to Top

F5c: Frequency of collab with faculty from other universities

  Mean Rating Frequently
(%)		 Sometimes
(%) 		Seldom (%)
 Never (%)
 Total (N)
Total (N) 3.1 41.4 38.8 11.4 8.5 887

F5c: Frequency of collab with faculty from other universities Mean Rating Frequently
(%)		 Sometimes
(%) 		Seldom (%)
 Never (%)
 Total (N)
College of appointment 3.3 48.4 36.5 10.7 4.5 244
..... CALS
..... CED 3.4 50.0 43.2 6.8 . 44
..... CHASS 2.9 33.6 36.9 11.4 18.1 149
..... CNR 3.2 40.0 42.0 14.0 4.0 50
..... COE 3.0 32.4 42.4 16.5 8.6 139
..... COM 3.2 39.5 46.5 7.0 7.0 43
..... COT 2.7 19.2 53.8 3.8 23.1 26
..... CVM 3.2 37.5 45.3 14.1 3.1 64
..... Design 2.5 8.3 45.8 29.2 16.7 24
..... PAMS 3.5 64.9 24.7 5.2 5.2 97
..... Student Affairs 2.2 . 60.0 . 40.0 5
Back to Top

F5d: Frequency of collab with non-faculty external to NCSU

  Mean Rating Frequently
(%)		 Sometimes
(%) 		Seldom (%)
 Never (%)
 Total (N)
Total (N) 2.7 27.9 33.1 19.2 19.9 886

F5d: Frequency of collab with non-faculty external to NCSU Mean Rating Frequently
(%)		 Sometimes
(%) 		Seldom (%)
 Never (%)
 Total (N)
College of appointment 3.0 41.0 29.9 17.6 11.5 244
..... CALS
..... CED 2.8 25.0 40.9 25.0 9.1 44
..... CHASS 2.1 13.4 26.2 18.1 42.3 149
..... CNR 3.2 51.0 30.6 10.2 8.2 49
..... COE 2.8 23.7 44.6 23.0 8.6 139
..... COM 2.3 11.6 37.2 23.3 27.9 43
..... COT 2.8 23.1 50.0 11.5 15.4 26
..... CVM 2.7 25.0 39.1 17.2 18.8 64
..... Design 2.6 37.5 12.5 20.8 29.2 24
..... PAMS 2.4 22.7 26.8 22.7 27.8 97
..... Student Affairs 2.2 . 60.0 . 40.0 5
Back to top

Continue to Section G: Faculty Support and Professional Development



For more information on the NC State University 2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey contact:
Dr. Nancy Whelchel, Associate Director for Survey Research
Office of Institutional Planning and Research
Box 7002
NCSU
Phone: (919) 515-4184
Email: ncsu_surveys@ncsu.edu

Posted: April, 2007

To download a Microsoft Word version of this document (Section F only), click here.

To download a Microsoft Word document with results for all sections of the survey, click here.

Return to Annotated Questionnaire

Return to 2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey Table of Contents Page