North Carolina State University
2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey:

Results for the College of Engineering
by Number of Years Employed at NC State

To skip directly to a particular section, select the section below.

Section B: Image and Vision	Section I: Post-Tenure Review
Section C: Leadership	Section J: Pay and Compensation
Section D: Faculty-Administration Relationships	Section K: Campus Infrastructure/Physical Environment
Section E: Diversity/Multiculturalism	Section L: Recreation/Wellness
Section F: Working Relationships	Section M: Work Activities
Section G: Faculty Support & Professional Development	Section N: Conclusions/Overall Satisfaction
Section H: Performance Review, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure

To download a Microsoft Word version of this document, click here.

A2: Ever held an administrative position	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
..... No (%)	92.5	78.6	61.7	40.9
..... Yes (%)	7.5	21.4	38.3	59.1
Total (N)	53	42	47	22

Back to Top

Section B: Image and Vision

B1a: Department doing good job of recruiting faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9	3.0	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	21.2	16.7	27.3	38.1
3: Agree (%)	59.6	59.5	50.0	52.4
2: Disagree (%)	17.3	16.7	20.5	9.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.9	7.1	2.3	.
Total (N)	52	42	44	21

B1b: Department creating culture where faculty can develop to full potential	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.7	2.6	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	21.2	15.0	11.4	15.0
3: Agree (%)	51.9	55.0	45.5	45.0
2: Disagree (%)	21.2	17.5	31.8	40.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.8	12.5	11.4	.
Total (N)	52	40	44	20

B1c: Department retaining most effective and productive faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9	2.9	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	18.0	22.5	18.2	25.0
3: Agree (%)	54.0	45.0	56.8	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	22.0	27.5	22.7	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.0	5.0	2.3	.
Total (N)	50	40	44	20

B2a: Department national reputation for undergraduate educ	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.4	3.8	3.8	4.1
5: Very strong (%)	3.8	19.5	15.6	31.8
4: Strong (%)	50.0	43.9	55.6	45.5
3: Average (%)	36.5	36.6	24.4	22.7
2: Weak (%)	5.8	.	4.4	.
1: Very weak (%)	3.8	.	.	.
Total (N)	52	41	45	22

B2b: Department national reputation for graduate education	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.7	3.7	3.7	3.5
5: Very strong (%)	11.5	12.2	15.2	9.1
4: Strong (%)	50.0	46.3	47.8	45.5
3: Average (%)	32.7	41.5	30.4	31.8
2: Weak (%)	3.8	.	6.5	13.6
1: Very weak (%)	1.9	.	.	.
Total (N)	52	41	46	22

B2c: Department national reputation for research & scholarly activity	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.6	3.7	3.8	3.6
5: Very strong (%)	3.8	14.6	23.9	10.0
4: Strong (%)	64.2	46.3	39.1	50.0
3: Average (%)	26.4	36.6	30.4	30.0
2: Weak (%)	1.9	2.4	6.5	10.0
1: Very weak (%)	3.8	.	.	.
Total (N)	53	41	46	20

B2d: Department national reputation for creative artistry and literature	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0	3.4	3.0
5: Very strong (%)	5.6	.	12.5	.
4: Strong (%)	11.1	40.0	25.0	25.0
3: Average (%)	50.0	30.0	56.3	50.0
2: Weak (%)	33.3	20.0	6.3	25.0
1: Very weak (%)	.	10.0	.	.
Total (N)	18	10	16	4

B2e: Department national reputation for tech & managerial innovation	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.5	3.5	3.3	3.2
5: Very strong (%)	6.8	17.6	8.1	5.9
4: Strong (%)	43.2	38.2	29.7	35.3
3: Average (%)	38.6	23.5	48.6	35.3
2: Weak (%)	11.4	17.6	13.5	23.5
1: Very weak (%)	.	2.9	.	.
Total (N)	44	34	37	17

B2f: Department national reputation for extension & engagement	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.6	3.5	3.4	3.3
5: Very strong (%)	10.6	14.3	5.0	5.3
4: Strong (%)	48.9	31.4	35.0	31.6
3: Average (%)	29.8	40.0	52.5	52.6
2: Weak (%)	8.5	14.3	5.0	5.3
1: Very weak (%)	2.1	.	2.5	5.3
Total (N)	47	35	40	19

B2g: Department national reputation for contrib to econ Development	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.6	3.3	3.1
5: Very strong (%)	4.8	25.0	8.1	9.5
4: Strong (%)	38.1	21.4	32.4	23.8
3: Average (%)	42.9	39.3	43.2	42.9
2: Weak (%)	14.3	14.3	13.5	14.3
1: Very weak (%)	.	.	2.7	9.5
Total (N)	42	28	37	21

B3a: Grade undergraduate majors' ability to meet prog demands	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	4.0	3.8	3.8	3.9
A (%)	21.6	9.5	6.4	9.1
B (%)	58.8	66.7	68.1	72.7
C (%)	13.7	21.4	25.5	13.6
D (%)	5.9	2.4	.	4.5
Total (N)	51	42	47	22

B3b: Grade graduate student ability to meet prog demands	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	4.3	4.3	4.1	3.9
A (%)	34.6	34.1	22.2	4.5
B (%)	55.8	61.0	64.4	81.8
C (%)	9.6	4.9	13.3	13.6
Total (N)	52	41	45	22

B3c: Grade demonstrated professional ability of faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	4.3	4.2	4.3	4.3
A (%)	42.3	31.7	37.0	31.8
B (%)	48.1	58.5	52.2	63.6
C (%)	7.7	9.8	10.9	4.5
D (%)	1.9	.	.	.
Total (N)	52	41	46	22

B3d: Grade professional achievement of faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	4.2	4.1	4.2	4.3
A (%)	36.5	16.7	37.8	33.3
B (%)	48.1	76.2	48.9	61.9
C (%)	13.5	4.8	13.3	4.8
D (%)	1.9	2.4	.	.
Total (N)	52	42	45	21

B3e: Grade own demonstrated professional ability	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	4.4	4.4	4.3	4.3
A (%)	48.1	41.5	50.0	31.8
B (%)	48.1	56.1	37.0	68.2
C (%)	3.8	2.4	10.9	.
F (%)	.	.	2.2	.
Total (N)	52	41	46	22

B3f: Grade own professional achievement	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	4.4	4.3	4.3	4.2
A (%)	42.3	39.0	50.0	22.7
B (%)	51.9	51.2	34.8	77.3
C (%)	5.8	9.8	10.9	.
D (%)	.	.	2.2	.
F (%)	.	.	2.2	.
Total (N)	52	41	46	22

B4: Department's vision for the future	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Clear vision; actively working toward goals (%)	28.3	23.8	27.7	27.3
Vision with slow progress (%)	34.0	50.0	31.9	40.9
No clear vision (%)	20.8	23.8	36.2	31.8
Not familiar (%)	17.0	2.4	4.3	.
Total (N)	53	42	47	22

B5: Agreement with department vision for future	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.2	3.2	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	34.4	19.4	25.9	26.7
3: Agree (%)	62.5	77.4	70.4	73.3
2: Disagree (%)	3.1	3.2	3.7	.
Total (N)	32	31	27	15

B6: College's vision for the future	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Clear vision; actively working toward goals (%)	7.7	4.8	10.6	18.2
Vision with slow progress (%)	34.6	47.6	42.6	27.3
No clear vision (%)	13.5	14.3	31.9	45.5
Not familiar (%)	44.2	33.3	14.9	9.1
Total (N)	52	42	47	22

B7a: Department change in next five years	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Change for the better (%)	69.8	64.3	58.7	54.5
Change for the worse (%)	7.5	4.8	15.2	27.3
Not really change (%)	22.6	31.0	26.1	18.2
Total (N)	53	42	46	22

B7b: College change in next five years	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Change for the better (%)	58.5	54.8	54.3	45.5
Change for the worse (%)	.	2.4	13.0	4.5
Not really change (%)	41.5	42.9	32.6	50.0
Total (N)	53	42	46	22

B7c: NC State change in next five years	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Change for the better (%)	37.7	35.7	39.1	40.9
Change for the worse (%)	.	7.1	8.7	13.6
Not really change (%)	62.3	57.1	52.2	45.5
Total (N)	53	42	46	22

Back to Top

Section C: Leadership

C1a: Dept admin communication with faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.7	2.6	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	21.6	22.0	21.7	13.6
3: Good (%)	60.8	34.1	34.8	50.0
2: Fair (%)	11.8	31.7	26.1	31.8
1: Poor (%)	5.9	12.2	17.4	4.5
Total (N)	51	41	46	22

C1b: Dept admin seek faculty input for dept vision	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.8	2.5	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	32.7	34.1	21.7	18.2
3: Good (%)	44.9	24.4	28.3	50.0
2: Fair (%)	16.3	24.4	30.4	18.2
1: Poor (%)	6.1	17.1	19.6	13.6
Total (N)	49	41	46	22

C1c: Dept admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.6	2.4	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	27.1	18.9	15.6	19.0
3: Good (%)	50.0	40.5	31.1	38.1
2: Fair (%)	14.6	27.0	35.6	28.6
1: Poor (%)	8.3	13.5	17.8	14.3
Total (N)	48	37	45	21

C1d: Dept admin delegate dept responsibility to faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.7	2.8	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	27.7	12.5	20.0	13.6
3: Good (%)	46.8	50.0	48.9	59.1
2: Fair (%)	17.0	30.0	20.0	22.7
1: Poor (%)	8.5	7.5	11.1	4.5
Total (N)	47	40	45	22

C1e: Dept admin grant faculty autonomy	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	3.1	3.0	3.1
4: Excellent (%)	45.1	35.9	23.8	31.8
3: Good (%)	37.3	41.0	50.0	54.5
2: Fair (%)	11.8	15.4	23.8	4.5
1: Poor (%)	5.9	7.7	2.4	9.1
Total (N)	51	39	42	22

C1f: Dept admin set clear and explicit priorities	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.5	2.4	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	20.8	15.8	6.8	4.8
3: Good (%)	41.7	31.6	36.4	66.7
2: Fair (%)	27.1	42.1	43.2	14.3
1: Poor (%)	10.4	10.5	13.6	14.3
Total (N)	48	38	44	21

C1g: Dept admin appreciate your contrib to mission	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8	2.9	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	28.0	30.0	27.9	18.2
3: Good (%)	48.0	35.0	39.5	40.9
2: Fair (%)	14.0	22.5	25.6	22.7
1: Poor (%)	10.0	12.5	7.0	18.2
Total (N)	50	40	43	22

C1h: Dept admin conflict resolution	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.5	2.3	2.3
4: Excellent (%)	23.1	20.0	7.3	16.7
3: Good (%)	35.9	28.6	34.1	27.8
2: Fair (%)	30.8	37.1	43.9	27.8
1: Poor (%)	10.3	14.3	14.6	27.8
Total (N)	39	35	41	18

C1i: Dept admin provide necessary resources	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.7	2.4	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	11.5	17.1	8.7	9.1
3: Good (%)	53.8	41.5	37.0	59.1
2: Fair (%)	26.9	31.7	37.0	27.3
1: Poor (%)	7.7	9.8	17.4	4.5
Total (N)	52	41	46	22

C1j: Dept admin allocate resources fairly	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.9	2.7	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	8.3	18.9	14.3	9.1
3: Good (%)	62.5	54.1	45.2	63.6
2: Fair (%)	20.8	21.6	35.7	22.7
1: Poor (%)	8.3	5.4	4.8	4.5
Total (N)	48	37	42	22

C1k: Dept admin serve as advocate for dept to college	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.4	3.0	3.4
4: Excellent (%)	32.0	54.8	37.5	45.0
3: Good (%)	54.0	32.3	30.0	50.0
2: Fair (%)	10.0	12.9	27.5	5.0
1: Poor (%)	4.0	.	5.0	.
Total (N)	50	31	40	20

C1l: Dept admin support academic freedom	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.3	3.3	3.6
4: Excellent (%)	43.8	52.8	41.5	55.0
3: Good (%)	45.8	36.1	46.3	45.0
2: Fair (%)	8.3	2.8	9.8	.
1: Poor (%)	2.1	8.3	2.4	.
Total (N)	48	36	41	20

C1m: Dept admin make rational decisions	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9	2.8	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	22.4	32.4	22.7	31.8
3: Good (%)	61.2	43.2	45.5	36.4
2: Fair (%)	8.2	10.8	22.7	27.3
1: Poor (%)	8.2	13.5	9.1	4.5
Total (N)	49	37	44	22

C1n: Dept admin make equitable decisions	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8	2.8	3.1
4: Excellent (%)	12.5	27.8	23.8	38.1
3: Good (%)	68.8	38.9	35.7	38.1
2: Fair (%)	10.4	19.4	33.3	19.0
1: Poor (%)	8.3	13.9	7.1	4.8
Total (N)	48	36	42	21

C1o: Dept admin promote diversity within dept	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8	2.7	3.2
4: Excellent (%)	17.8	27.0	15.8	36.8
3: Good (%)	51.1	40.5	47.4	52.6
2: Fair (%)	28.9	18.9	28.9	5.3
1: Poor (%)	2.2	13.5	7.9	5.3
Total (N)	45	37	38	19

C2a: College admin communication with faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.2	2.3	2.5
4: Excellent (%)	13.2	2.9	5.3	11.8
3: Good (%)	39.5	40.0	34.2	41.2
2: Fair (%)	39.5	34.3	42.1	35.3
1: Poor (%)	7.9	22.9	18.4	11.8
Total (N)	38	35	38	17

C2b: College admin seek faculty input for vision	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	1.9	2.0	2.1
4: Excellent (%)	6.9	3.3	5.7	.
3: Good (%)	37.9	23.3	17.1	40.0
2: Fair (%)	31.0	36.7	51.4	33.3
1: Poor (%)	24.1	36.7	25.7	26.7
Total (N)	29	30	35	15

C2c: College admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	1.8	2.1	1.9
4: Excellent (%)	3.7	4.3	7.1	.
3: Good (%)	40.7	8.7	28.6	26.7
2: Fair (%)	33.3	52.2	35.7	33.3
1: Poor (%)	22.2	34.8	28.6	40.0
Total (N)	27	23	28	15

C2d: College admin grant departmental autonomy	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9	2.8	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	13.3	21.4	16.7	12.5
3: Good (%)	56.7	53.6	58.3	50.0
2: Fair (%)	23.3	17.9	16.7	31.3
1: Poor (%)	6.7	7.1	8.3	6.3
Total (N)	30	28	36	16

C2e: College admin set clear and explicit priorities	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.4	2.4	2.1	2.2
4: Excellent (%)	4.2	11.1	6.1	.
3: Good (%)	45.8	37.0	15.2	41.2
2: Fair (%)	37.5	29.6	60.6	35.3
1: Poor (%)	12.5	22.2	18.2	23.5
Total (N)	24	27	33	17

C2f: College admin appreciate your contrib to mission	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.3	2.5	2.0
4: Excellent (%)	10.3	10.3	21.9	.
3: Good (%)	58.6	31.0	21.9	26.7
2: Fair (%)	27.6	34.5	40.6	46.7
1: Poor (%)	3.4	24.1	15.6	26.7
Total (N)	29	29	32	15

C2g: College admin conflict resolution	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.0	2.3	2.3
4: Excellent (%)	11.8	5.9	4.3	.
3: Good (%)	58.8	23.5	39.1	45.5
2: Fair (%)	23.5	35.3	39.1	36.4
1: Poor (%)	5.9	35.3	17.4	18.2
Total (N)	17	17	23	11

C2h: College admin provide necessary resources	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.4	2.3	2.1	2.4
4: Excellent (%)	4.5	8.8	9.8	6.3
3: Good (%)	50.0	32.4	22.0	43.8
2: Fair (%)	25.0	35.3	39.0	31.3
1: Poor (%)	20.5	23.5	29.3	18.8
Total (N)	44	34	41	16

C2i: College admin allocate resources fairly	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.4	2.0	2.2	2.2
4: Excellent (%)	3.4	3.4	.	.
3: Good (%)	55.2	24.1	33.3	42.9
2: Fair (%)	24.1	44.8	51.5	35.7
1: Poor (%)	17.2	27.6	15.2	21.4
Total (N)	29	29	33	14

C2j: College admin serve as advocate for college to univ	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9	2.7	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	13.0	33.3	13.8	35.7
3: Good (%)	65.2	33.3	55.2	21.4
2: Fair (%)	13.0	25.0	17.2	28.6
1: Poor (%)	8.7	8.3	13.8	14.3
Total (N)	23	24	29	14

C2k: College admin support academic freedom	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.0	3.0	3.2
4: Excellent (%)	27.6	34.6	16.1	30.8
3: Good (%)	58.6	42.3	74.2	61.5
2: Fair (%)	10.3	15.4	6.5	7.7
1: Poor (%)	3.4	7.7	3.2	.
Total (N)	29	26	31	13

C2l: College admin make rational decisions	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8	2.7	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	8.3	14.8	11.8	18.8
3: Good (%)	75.0	51.9	55.9	37.5
2: Fair (%)	12.5	29.6	23.5	31.3
1: Poor (%)	4.2	3.7	8.8	12.5
Total (N)	24	27	34	16

C2m: College admin make equitable decisions	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.5	2.6	2.3
4: Excellent (%)	9.5	7.7	6.3	13.3
3: Good (%)	61.9	50.0	56.3	20.0
2: Fair (%)	19.0	23.1	28.1	53.3
1: Poor (%)	9.5	19.2	9.4	13.3
Total (N)	21	26	32	15

C2n: College admin promote diversity within college	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.9	2.7	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	6.5	23.3	19.4	30.8
3: Good (%)	71.0	50.0	51.6	38.5
2: Fair (%)	12.9	20.0	12.9	30.8
1: Poor (%)	9.7	6.7	16.1	.
Total (N)	31	30	31	13

C3a: Univ admin communication with faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	2.2	2.0	2.2
4: Excellent (%)	7.9	5.3	2.4	.
3: Good (%)	42.1	34.2	22.0	40.0
2: Fair (%)	26.3	31.6	46.3	40.0
1: Poor (%)	23.7	28.9	29.3	20.0
Total (N)	38	38	41	20

C3b: Univ admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.1	1.7	1.8	2.1
4: Excellent (%)	4.2	4.2	.	.
3: Good (%)	29.2	12.5	17.6	37.5
2: Fair (%)	41.7	29.2	44.1	31.3
1: Poor (%)	25.0	54.2	38.2	31.3
Total (N)	24	24	34	16

C3c: Univ admin set clear and explicit priorities	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.2	2.1	2.2
4: Excellent (%)	3.4	10.0	.	.
3: Good (%)	51.7	26.7	34.3	56.3
2: Fair (%)	34.5	40.0	37.1	6.3
1: Poor (%)	10.3	23.3	28.6	37.5
Total (N)	29	30	35	16

C3d: Univ admin serves as advocate for univ to constituents	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.9	2.5	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	12.0	28.6	16.1	12.5
3: Good (%)	52.0	39.3	35.5	50.0
2: Fair (%)	24.0	21.4	35.5	25.0
1: Poor (%)	12.0	10.7	12.9	12.5
Total (N)	25	28	31	16

C3e: Univ admin support academic freedom	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	3.1	2.8	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	21.2	36.7	17.1	11.8
3: Good (%)	54.5	43.3	48.6	58.8
2: Fair (%)	18.2	10.0	28.6	29.4
1: Poor (%)	6.1	10.0	5.7	.
Total (N)	33	30	35	17

C3f: Univ admin make rational decisions	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.6	2.4	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	7.4	10.0	5.9	12.5
3: Good (%)	63.0	50.0	41.2	50.0
2: Fair (%)	22.2	30.0	38.2	25.0
1: Poor (%)	7.4	10.0	14.7	12.5
Total (N)	27	30	34	16

C3g: Univ admin make equitable decisions	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.5	2.2	2.4
4: Excellent (%)	8.3	14.8	3.3	6.3
3: Good (%)	50.0	37.0	40.0	43.8
2: Fair (%)	29.2	29.6	30.0	37.5
1: Poor (%)	12.5	18.5	26.7	12.5
Total (N)	24	27	30	16

C3h: Univ admin promote diversity within university	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	3.0	2.9	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	9.4	25.0	21.2	30.0
3: Good (%)	65.6	53.1	51.5	45.0
2: Fair (%)	12.5	18.8	21.2	20.0
1: Poor (%)	12.5	3.1	6.1	5.0
Total (N)	32	32	33	20

Back to Top

Section D: Faculty-Administration Relationships

D1a: I am encouraged to give input on curricular issues	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.4	3.5	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	50.0	51.2	57.1	59.1
3: Agree (%)	32.7	39.0	35.7	31.8
2: Disagree (%)	13.5	7.3	7.1	9.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.8	2.4	.	.
Total (N)	52	41	42	22

D1b: I am encouraged to give input on prog assessment	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	3.3	3.4	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	34.6	46.3	40.9	59.1
3: Agree (%)	53.8	46.3	54.5	36.4
2: Disagree (%)	9.6	2.4	4.5	4.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.9	4.9	.	.
Total (N)	52	41	44	22

D1c: I am encouraged to give input on dept hiring	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.1	3.3	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	21.2	41.5	41.9	45.5
3: Agree (%)	61.5	36.6	41.9	36.4
2: Disagree (%)	13.5	14.6	16.3	9.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.8	7.3	.	9.1
Total (N)	52	41	43	22

D1d: I am encouraged to give input on college admin appointments	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	2.3	2.5	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	5.8	9.8	9.1	13.6
3: Agree (%)	36.5	34.1	47.7	36.4
2: Disagree (%)	44.2	34.1	31.8	31.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	13.5	22.0	11.4	18.2
Total (N)	52	41	44	22

D1e: I am encouraged to give input on university admin appointments	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.2	2.3	2.3	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	1.9	9.8	2.3	13.6
3: Agree (%)	34.6	36.6	41.9	18.2
2: Disagree (%)	48.1	24.4	39.5	27.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	15.4	29.3	16.3	40.9
Total (N)	52	41	43	22

D2: Familiarity with academic program assessment in dept	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.4	3.6	3.8
4: Very familiar (%)	28.8	48.8	57.8	81.0
3: Somewhat familiar (%)	55.8	43.9	40.0	19.0
2: Not very familiar (%)	5.8	7.3	2.2	.
1: Not at all familiar (%)	9.6	.	.	.
Total (N)	52	41	45	21

D3a: Understanding of resource allocation to university	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	1.6	1.9	2.2	2.4
4: Very well (%)	.	.	2.3	4.5
3: Fairly well (%)	7.8	14.6	34.1	45.5
2: Not very well (%)	47.1	58.5	45.5	31.8
1: Not at all (%)	45.1	26.8	18.2	18.2
Total (N)	51	41	44	22

D3b: Understanding of resource allocation to college	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	1.7	2.0	2.1	2.3
4: Very well (%)	.	.	2.3	4.5
3: Fairly well (%)	7.7	14.6	20.5	31.8
2: Not very well (%)	53.8	65.9	63.6	50.0
1: Not at all (%)	38.5	19.5	13.6	13.6
Total (N)	52	41	44	22

D3c: Understanding of resource allocation to department	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.2	2.2	2.5	2.5
4: Very well (%)	3.8	2.4	14.0	13.6
3: Fairly well (%)	25.0	31.7	27.9	27.3
2: Not very well (%)	53.8	51.2	55.8	50.0
1: Not at all (%)	17.3	14.6	2.3	9.1
Total (N)	52	41	43	22

D3d: Understanding of resource allocation within department	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.7	3.0	2.8
4: Very well (%)	11.5	14.6	27.3	13.6
3: Fairly well (%)	44.2	46.3	47.7	54.5
2: Not very well (%)	34.6	34.1	25.0	31.8
1: Not at all (%)	9.6	4.9	.	.
Total (N)	52	41	44	22

D4: Faculty have sufficient input on dept resource allocation	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.4	2.6	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	2.0	10.0	11.1	4.5
3: Agree (%)	56.0	30.0	46.7	54.5
2: Disagree (%)	34.0	47.5	35.6	40.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.0	12.5	6.7	.
Total (N)	50	40	45	22

D5: Dept faculty searches/appointments are collegial and inclusive	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.2	3.1	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	34.6	39.0	37.2	42.9
3: Agree (%)	59.6	41.5	44.2	52.4
2: Disagree (%)	3.8	17.1	14.0	4.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.9	2.4	4.7	.
Total (N)	52	41	43	21

D6a: Relations between faculty in dept and dept admin	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	2.9	2.8	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	30.8	30.8	20.5	28.6
3: Good (%)	53.8	38.5	54.5	38.1
2: Fair (%)	11.5	17.9	13.6	23.8
1: Poor (%)	3.8	12.8	11.4	9.5
Total (N)	52	39	44	21

D6b: Relations between faculty in dept and college admin	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.5	2.7	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	7.7	9.1	5.6	16.7
3: Good (%)	66.7	45.5	58.3	38.9
2: Fair (%)	23.1	36.4	36.1	33.3
1: Poor (%)	2.6	9.1	.	11.1
Total (N)	39	33	36	18

D6c: Relations between faculty in dept and univ admin	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.5	2.4	2.3
4: Excellent (%)	4.0	11.5	.	.
3: Good (%)	52.0	42.3	54.5	35.3
2: Fair (%)	40.0	26.9	30.3	58.8
1: Poor (%)	4.0	19.2	15.2	5.9
Total (N)	25	26	33	17

D6d: Relations between all faculty and univ admin	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.4	2.5	2.3	2.2
4: Excellent (%)	4.0	8.3	.	.
3: Good (%)	48.0	45.8	48.6	29.4
2: Fair (%)	32.0	33.3	34.3	58.8
1: Poor (%)	16.0	12.5	17.1	11.8
Total (N)	25	24	35	17

D7a: Faculty Senate effective commun between faculty and univ admin	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.5	2.2	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	4.0	7.4	.	11.1
3: Agree (%)	56.0	51.9	40.5	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	24.0	25.9	40.5	22.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	16.0	14.8	18.9	16.7
Total (N)	25	27	37	18

D7b: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty in general	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.3	2.4	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	4.0	8.7	2.9	16.7
3: Agree (%)	64.0	39.1	41.2	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	12.0	30.4	47.1	16.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	20.0	21.7	8.8	16.7
Total (N)	25	23	34	18

D7c: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty like me	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	2.0	2.2	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	4.3	3.8	.	5.9
3: Agree (%)	47.8	19.2	40.0	47.1
2: Disagree (%)	17.4	50.0	42.9	17.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	30.4	26.9	17.1	29.4
Total (N)	23	26	35	17

D8: Effectiveness of university grievance procedures	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.7	2.7	2.7
4: Very effective (%)	.	10.0	16.7	.
3: Somewhat effective (%)	69.2	60.0	44.4	72.2
2: Not very effective (%)	23.1	20.0	27.8	22.2
1: Not at all effective (%)	7.7	10.0	11.1	5.6
Total (N)	13	10	18	18

D9: Importance of "ombuds" for informal conflict resolution	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.5	3.5	3.3	3.5
4: Very important (%)	53.8	58.5	47.7	59.1
3: Somewhat important (%)	44.2	36.6	36.4	36.4
2: Not very important (%)	.	2.4	13.6	4.5
1: Not at all important (%)	1.9	2.4	2.3	.
Total (N)	52	41	44	22

Back to Top

Section E: Diversity/Multiculturalism

E1: Importance of institutional emphasis on diversity/multiculturalism	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.4	3.4	3.3	3.1
4: Very important (%)	51.0	53.8	47.7	31.8
3: Somewhat important (%)	36.7	35.9	36.4	50.0
2: Not very important (%)	10.2	7.7	13.6	13.6
1: Not at all important (%)	2.0	2.6	2.3	4.5
Total (N)	49	39	44	22

E2: Importance of diversity to enhanced learning in own classroom	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.1	2.8	2.5
4: Very important (%)	25.0	26.3	20.5	13.6
3: Somewhat important (%)	50.0	57.9	45.5	31.8
2: Not very important (%)	20.8	10.5	25.0	45.5
1: Not at all important (%)	4.2	5.3	9.1	9.1
Total (N)	48	38	44	22

E3: NCSU prepares students to live and work in diverse society	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9	2.9	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.0	15.6	7.1	10.0
3: Agree (%)	75.0	65.6	76.2	85.0
2: Disagree (%)	15.0	15.6	14.3	5.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	3.1	2.4	.
Total (N)	40	32	42	20

E4a: My dept recruits historically underrepresented students	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.8	3.0	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.6	16.2	23.8	15.8
3: Agree (%)	48.7	54.1	50.0	63.2
2: Disagree (%)	23.1	21.6	23.8	21.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.6	8.1	2.4	.
Total (N)	39	37	42	19

E4b: My dept retains historically underrepresented students	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	3.0	2.9	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	16.2	15.6	20.0	15.0
3: Agree (%)	54.1	65.6	55.0	75.0
2: Disagree (%)	27.0	18.8	22.5	10.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.7	.	2.5	.
Total (N)	37	32	40	20

E4c: My dept supports historically underrepresented students	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0	2.9	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	18.4	15.6	17.5	20.0
3: Agree (%)	57.9	65.6	60.0	70.0
2: Disagree (%)	23.7	18.8	20.0	10.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	2.5	.
Total (N)	38	32	40	20

E4d: My dept recruits historically underrepresented faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9	3.0	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	19.4	22.9	17.1	23.8
3: Agree (%)	58.3	48.6	63.4	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	19.4	28.6	19.5	9.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.8	.	.	.
Total (N)	36	35	41	21

E4e: My dept retains historically underrepresented faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0	2.9	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	17.9	25.8	21.1	19.0
3: Agree (%)	60.7	51.6	52.6	76.2
2: Disagree (%)	21.4	19.4	26.3	4.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	3.2	.	.
Total (N)	28	31	38	21

E4f: My dept supports historically underrepresented faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0	3.0	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	17.2	25.0	19.4	25.0
3: Agree (%)	65.5	53.6	61.1	70.0
2: Disagree (%)	17.2	17.9	19.4	5.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	3.6	.	.
Total (N)	29	28	36	20

E5a: Dept environ accepting/respectful of age	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.4	3.3	3.4	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	40.0	47.4	35.7	55.0
3: Agree (%)	57.8	44.7	64.3	30.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	2.6	.	10.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.2	5.3	.	5.0
Total (N)	45	38	42	20

E5b: Dept environ accepting/respectful of disability status	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.5	3.4	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	37.5	51.9	44.4	70.6
3: Agree (%)	56.3	48.1	55.6	29.4
2: Disagree (%)	3.1	.	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.1	.	.	.
Total (N)	32	27	36	17

E5c: Dept environ accepting/respectful of gender	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.4	3.3	3.3	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	40.0	39.5	34.1	63.2
3: Agree (%)	57.8	55.3	61.0	36.8
2: Disagree (%)	2.2	5.3	4.9	.
Total (N)	45	38	41	19

E5d: Dept environ accepting/respectful of military status	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.4	3.3	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	36.0	50.0	38.1	57.1
3: Agree (%)	56.0	45.0	57.1	42.9
2: Disagree (%)	8.0	.	4.8	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	5.0	.	.
Total (N)	25	20	21	14

E5e: Dept environ accepting/respectful of nationality/ethnic origin	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.2	3.4	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	38.6	40.5	42.5	66.7
3: Agree (%)	52.3	45.9	57.5	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	6.8	8.1	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.3	5.4	.	.
Total (N)	44	37	40	18

E5f: Dept environ accepting/respectful of race and color	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.2	3.3	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	38.6	40.5	35.0	65.0
3: Agree (%)	54.5	45.9	62.5	35.0
2: Disagree (%)	6.8	8.1	2.5	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	5.4	.	.
Total (N)	44	37	40	20

E5g: Dept environ accepting/respectful of religion	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.3	3.3	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	40.0	43.8	35.9	66.7
3: Agree (%)	51.4	46.9	61.5	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	8.6	6.3	2.6	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	3.1	.	.
Total (N)	35	32	39	18

E5h: Dept environ accepting/respectful of sexual orientation	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.5	3.3	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	43.5	55.0	34.8	58.3
3: Agree (%)	47.8	40.0	65.2	41.7
2: Disagree (%)	4.3	5.0	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.3	.	.	.
Total (N)	23	20	23	12

E6a: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of age	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.4	3.6	3.5	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	43.8	61.1	47.6	68.4
3: Agree (%)	54.2	36.1	52.4	26.3
2: Disagree (%)	2.1	.	.	5.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	2.8	.	.
Total (N)	48	36	42	19

E6b: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of disability status	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.4	3.6	3.4	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	42.5	64.5	40.5	70.6
3: Agree (%)	57.5	32.3	59.5	23.5
2: Disagree (%)	.	.	.	5.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	3.2	.	.
Total (N)	40	31	37	17

E6c: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of gender	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.4	3.6	3.5	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	44.7	62.9	47.6	65.0
3: Agree (%)	55.3	34.3	52.4	30.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	.	.	5.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	2.9	.	.
Total (N)	47	35	42	20

E6d: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of military status	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.5	3.5	3.4	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	46.9	58.3	35.7	76.9
3: Agree (%)	53.1	37.5	64.3	15.4
2: Disagree (%)	.	.	.	7.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	4.2	.	.
Total (N)	32	24	28	13

E6e: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of national/ethnic origin	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.4	3.5	3.5	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	40.0	60.0	48.8	68.4
3: Agree (%)	57.8	34.3	51.2	26.3
2: Disagree (%)	.	2.9	.	5.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.2	2.9	.	.
Total (N)	45	35	41	19

E6f: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of race and color	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.4	3.6	3.5	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	41.7	61.8	47.5	65.0
3: Agree (%)	56.3	35.3	50.0	30.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	.	2.5	5.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.1	2.9	.	.
Total (N)	48	34	40	20

E6g: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of religion	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.4	3.6	3.5	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	43.2	61.8	47.5	72.2
3: Agree (%)	54.5	35.3	50.0	22.2
2: Disagree (%)	2.3	.	2.5	5.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	2.9	.	.
Total (N)	44	34	40	18

E6h: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of sexual orientation	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.4	3.3	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	38.7	52.2	33.3	72.7
3: Agree (%)	58.1	43.5	66.7	18.2
2: Disagree (%)	.	.	.	9.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.2	4.3	.	.
Total (N)	31	23	24	11

E7: Faculty diversity/multiculturalism enhancement of intellectual diversity in dept	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.7	2.5	2.4
4: A great deal (%)	14.9	13.9	12.2	18.2
3: Some (%)	44.7	52.8	43.9	27.3
2: A little (%)	23.4	22.2	29.3	27.3
1: Not at all (%)	17.0	11.1	14.6	27.3
Total (N)	47	36	41	22

E8: Inclusion of diversity-related topics, scholarship, etc in your courses	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	1.8	1.6	1.6	1.8
4: A great deal (%)	2.4	.	2.4	4.8
3: Some (%)	26.2	16.7	14.6	23.8
2: A little (%)	23.8	23.3	22.0	19.0
1: Not at all (%)	47.6	60.0	61.0	52.4
Total (N)	42	30	41	21

E9a: Interest in research, extension, art endeavors outside U.S.	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	3.3	3.2	3.0
4: A great deal (%)	49.0	56.4	48.8	31.8
3: Some (%)	32.7	28.2	34.9	50.0
2: A little (%)	8.2	7.7	4.7	9.1
1: None (%)	10.2	7.7	11.6	9.1
Total (N)	49	39	43	22

E9b: Interest in teaching study abroad	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.7	2.4	2.6
4: A great deal (%)	18.4	30.8	16.3	22.7
3: Some (%)	38.8	33.3	34.9	40.9
2: A little (%)	24.5	15.4	18.6	9.1
1: None (%)	18.4	20.5	30.2	27.3
Total (N)	49	39	43	22

E9c: Interest in participating in spring break service learning	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.2	1.8	1.7	1.7
4: A great deal (%)	4.1	2.6	2.3	9.1
3: Some (%)	42.9	23.1	18.6	13.6
2: A little (%)	26.5	30.8	23.3	13.6
1: None (%)	26.5	43.6	55.8	63.6
Total (N)	49	39	43	22

E9d: Interest in participating in international service projects	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.6	2.3	2.2
4: A great deal (%)	22.4	20.5	16.3	18.2
3: Some (%)	30.6	35.9	27.9	27.3
2: A little (%)	22.4	23.1	23.3	13.6
1: None (%)	24.5	20.5	32.6	40.9
Total (N)	49	39	43	22

E9e: Interest in teaching in international studies major	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.1	2.1	1.7	1.9
4: A great deal (%)	14.3	12.8	7.0	9.1
3: Some (%)	20.4	25.6	16.3	22.7
2: A little (%)	24.5	17.9	11.6	13.6
1: None (%)	40.8	43.6	65.1	54.5
Total (N)	49	39	43	22

E9f: Interest in advising international students	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	3.3	3.0	3.0
4: A great deal (%)	49.0	47.4	39.5	36.4
3: Some (%)	32.7	39.5	34.9	45.5
2: A little (%)	6.1	10.5	14.0	.
1: None (%)	12.2	2.6	11.6	18.2
Total (N)	49	38	43	22

Back to Top

Section F: Working Relationships

F1: There is unity/cohesion among faculty in my department	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9	3.0	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	20.8	31.6	16.7	27.3
3: Agree (%)	43.8	36.8	61.9	36.4
2: Disagree (%)	31.3	18.4	21.4	27.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.2	13.2	.	9.1
Total (N)	48	38	42	22

F2a: Good communication between my students and me	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.6	3.6	3.4	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	55.1	59.5	40.5	45.5
3: Agree (%)	44.9	40.5	57.1	54.5
2: Disagree (%)	.	.	2.4	.
Total (N)	49	37	42	22

F2b: Good communication between dept and our students	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.2	3.1	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	23.4	30.6	16.7	30.0
3: Agree (%)	61.7	58.3	73.8	55.0
2: Disagree (%)	14.9	11.1	9.5	15.0
Total (N)	47	36	42	20

F2c: Good communication between faculty in my dept	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9	2.9	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	26.5	27.0	9.5	28.6
3: Agree (%)	49.0	48.6	71.4	42.9
2: Disagree (%)	20.4	16.2	16.7	28.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.1	8.1	2.4	.
Total (N)	49	37	42	21

F2d: Good communication between my dept and other depts	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.6	2.6	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	13.8	16.0	.	5.6
3: Agree (%)	48.3	36.0	69.4	55.6
2: Disagree (%)	34.5	36.0	25.0	38.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.4	12.0	5.6	.
Total (N)	29	25	36	18

F2e: Good communication between my college and other colleges	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.6	2.4	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	15.0	.	.	8.3
3: Agree (%)	40.0	62.5	41.7	58.3
2: Disagree (%)	40.0	37.5	54.2	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.0	.	4.2	8.3
Total (N)	20	16	24	12

F3: Dept environ promotes respectful dialogue between diverse perspectives	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	3.1	3.1	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	30.6	39.5	28.6	38.1
3: Agree (%)	59.2	39.5	59.5	38.1
2: Disagree (%)	8.2	13.2	9.5	23.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.0	7.9	2.4	.
Total (N)	49	38	42	21

F4a: Frequency given/recvd teaching advice in dept past few years	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0	3.1	2.9
Frequently (%)	24.5	31.6	33.3	18.2
Sometimes (%)	57.1	42.1	50.0	59.1
Seldom (%)	16.3	21.1	11.9	13.6
Never (%)	2.0	5.3	4.8	9.1
Total (N)	49	38	42	22

F4b: Frequency given/recvd research/artistic feedback in dept past few yrs	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	3.2	3.2	3.0
Frequently (%)	20.4	50.0	42.9	27.3
Sometimes (%)	53.1	28.9	40.5	54.5
Seldom (%)	14.3	13.2	11.9	4.5
Never (%)	12.2	7.9	4.8	13.6
Total (N)	49	38	42	22

F4c: Frequency given/recvd help with dept/college bureaucracy past few yrs	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0	3.3	3.0
Frequently (%)	22.4	28.9	40.5	22.7
Sometimes (%)	51.0	52.6	47.6	54.5
Seldom (%)	22.4	10.5	9.5	18.2
Never (%)	4.1	7.9	2.4	4.5
Total (N)	49	38	42	22

F4d: Frequency given/recvd help undrsnd reappointment, promotion, tenure past few yrs	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.2	3.2	3.0
Frequently (%)	22.4	44.7	38.1	27.3
Sometimes (%)	61.2	36.8	50.0	50.0
Seldom (%)	12.2	10.5	4.8	22.7
Never (%)	4.1	7.9	7.1	.
Total (N)	49	38	42	22

F4e: Frequency given/recvd help with work/personal balance issues past few yrs	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.1	2.2	2.2	2.2
Frequently (%)	4.1	7.9	9.5	13.6
Sometimes (%)	32.7	28.9	33.3	31.8
Seldom (%)	36.7	39.5	28.6	18.2
Never (%)	26.5	23.7	28.6	36.4
Total (N)	49	38	42	22

F5a: Frequency of collab with faculty in your dept	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.5	3.7	3.7	3.2
Frequently (%)	57.1	76.3	69.0	50.0
Sometimes (%)	32.7	18.4	28.6	27.3
Seldom (%)	10.2	2.6	2.4	18.2
Never (%)	.	2.6	.	4.5
Total (N)	49	38	42	22

F5b: Frequency of collab with faculty in other NCSU depts	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	3.2	3.2	2.6
Frequently (%)	22.4	42.1	42.9	9.1
Sometimes (%)	53.1	39.5	40.5	50.0
Seldom (%)	12.2	13.2	7.1	31.8
Never (%)	12.2	5.3	9.5	9.1
Total (N)	49	38	42	22

F5c: Frequency of collab with faculty from other universities	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	3.2	2.8	2.6
Frequently (%)	28.6	42.1	21.4	27.3
Sometimes (%)	42.9	39.5	47.6	27.3
Seldom (%)	16.3	15.8	16.7	27.3
Never (%)	12.2	2.6	14.3	18.2
Total (N)	49	38	42	22

F5d: Frequency of collab with non-faculty external to NCSU	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	3.1	2.7	2.6
Frequently (%)	24.5	31.6	16.7	22.7
Sometimes (%)	40.8	47.4	47.6	31.8
Seldom (%)	22.4	15.8	26.2	27.3
Never (%)	12.2	5.3	9.5	18.2
Total (N)	49	38	42	22

Back to Top

Section G: Faculty Support & Professional Development

G1a: Satisfaction with level of courses	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	3.4	3.4	3.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	34.0	51.4	46.3	42.9
3: Satisfied (%)	59.6	40.5	51.2	57.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	2.1	8.1	2.4	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	4.3	.	.	.
Total (N)	47	37	41	21

G1b: Satisfaction with number of courses	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	3.2	3.3	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	33.3	35.1	41.5	31.8
3: Satisfied (%)	52.1	45.9	43.9	63.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	12.5	18.9	14.6	4.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.1	.	.	.
Total (N)	48	37	41	22

G1c: Satisfaction with choice in courses	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	3.3	3.3	3.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	35.4	40.5	41.5	45.5
3: Satisfied (%)	54.2	51.4	48.8	45.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	8.3	5.4	7.3	9.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.1	2.7	2.4	.
Total (N)	48	37	41	22

G1d: Satisfaction with course content discretion	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.4	3.7	3.5	3.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	47.9	67.6	54.8	63.6
3: Satisfied (%)	45.8	32.4	45.2	36.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	4.2	.	.	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.1	.	.	.
Total (N)	48	37	42	22

G1e: Satisfaction with number of students	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.1	3.0	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	22.9	35.1	31.0	22.7
3: Satisfied (%)	64.6	37.8	40.5	63.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	8.3	24.3	26.2	9.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	4.2	2.7	2.4	4.5
Total (N)	48	37	42	22

G1f: Satisfaction with quality of undergraduates	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.7	2.9	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	11.6	13.5	4.8	4.5
3: Satisfied (%)	60.5	51.4	85.7	63.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	23.3	29.7	7.1	27.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	4.7	5.4	2.4	4.5
Total (N)	43	37	42	22

G1g: Satisfaction with quality of graduate students	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.1	3.1	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	12.8	19.4	27.5	10.0
3: Satisfied (%)	76.6	75.0	57.5	75.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	10.6	5.6	15.0	15.0
Total (N)	47	36	40	20

G1h: Satisfaction with access to grad TAs	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.9	3.0	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	8.9	18.9	22.0	27.3
3: Satisfied (%)	60.0	51.4	61.0	59.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	22.2	29.7	17.1	13.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	8.9	.	.	.
Total (N)	45	37	41	22

G1i: Satisfaction with access to grad RAs	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0	3.1	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	20.5	22.9	30.0	20.0
3: Satisfied (%)	61.4	51.4	45.0	70.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	15.9	25.7	25.0	5.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.3	.	.	5.0
Total (N)	44	35	40	20

G2a: NCSU supports innovative teaching	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	3.1	3.0	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	28.3	34.3	25.0	18.2
3: Agree (%)	58.7	45.7	52.5	68.2
2: Disagree (%)	13.0	17.1	20.0	4.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	2.9	2.5	9.1
Total (N)	46	35	40	22

G2b: NCSU supports innovative research and scholarly activity	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.1	3.2	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	28.6	36.1	36.6	22.7
3: Agree (%)	53.1	44.4	46.3	68.2
2: Disagree (%)	14.3	13.9	14.6	4.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.1	5.6	2.4	4.5
Total (N)	49	36	41	22

G2c: NCSU supports innovative creative artistry and literature	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	2.4	2.6	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	22.2	14.3	.	20.0
3: Agree (%)	66.7	42.9	62.5	80.0
2: Disagree (%)	11.1	14.3	37.5	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	28.6	.	.
Total (N)	9	7	8	5

G2d: NCSU supports innovative extension/engagement/econ dev activity	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.1	2.8	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	16.1	21.4	12.9	11.1
3: Agree (%)	67.7	71.4	61.3	77.8
2: Disagree (%)	16.1	7.1	16.1	11.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	9.7	.
Total (N)	31	28	31	18

G3a: NCSU rewards innovative teaching	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.6	2.6	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	4.8	10.8	7.5	9.1
3: Agree (%)	61.9	45.9	47.5	45.5
2: Disagree (%)	23.8	32.4	37.5	27.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.5	10.8	7.5	18.2
Total (N)	42	37	40	22

G3b: NCSU rewards innovative research and scholarly activity	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	3.1	3.2	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	22.7	37.8	39.0	36.4
3: Agree (%)	50.0	40.5	48.8	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	18.2	10.8	7.3	13.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.1	10.8	4.9	.
Total (N)	44	37	41	22

G3c: NCSU rewards innovative creative artistry and literature	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.4	2.8	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	.	22.2	25.0
3: Agree (%)	60.0	57.1	33.3	75.0
2: Disagree (%)	40.0	28.6	44.4	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	14.3	.	.
Total (N)	5	7	9	4

G3d: NCSU rewards innovative extension/engagement/econ dev activity	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.5	2.7	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	13.0	13.6	16.0	5.3
3: Agree (%)	56.5	45.5	44.0	57.9
2: Disagree (%)	26.1	22.7	36.0	31.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.3	18.2	4.0	5.3
Total (N)	23	22	25	19

G4a: Satisfaction: Availability of classroom technology	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.3	3.2	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	41.3	37.8	31.7	27.3
3: Satisfied (%)	45.7	54.1	58.5	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	13.0	8.1	4.9	13.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	.	4.9	9.1
Total (N)	46	37	41	22

G4b: Satisfaction: Teaching reduction for scholarly/prof growth	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.4	2.6	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	5.7	10.0	2.8	10.0
3: Satisfied (%)	68.6	36.7	58.3	65.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	20.0	33.3	30.6	15.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.7	20.0	8.3	10.0
Total (N)	35	30	36	20

G4c: Satisfaction: Teaching workshop/seminar opportunities	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	3.1	2.8	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	23.9	17.1	7.7	15.0
3: Satisfied (%)	71.7	80.0	69.2	80.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	2.2	2.9	17.9	5.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.2	.	5.1	.
Total (N)	46	35	39	20

G4d: Satisfaction: Avail of funds to attend teaching conference/wrkshp	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.2	2.0	2.1	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	4.0	.	5.3
3: Satisfied (%)	40.0	24.0	29.0	52.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	40.0	44.0	48.4	26.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	20.0	28.0	22.6	15.8
Total (N)	25	25	31	19

G4e: Satisfaction: Learning technology training/support	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0	2.9	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	13.9	20.7	12.5	9.1
3: Satisfied (%)	75.0	69.0	67.5	77.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	8.3	3.4	20.0	4.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.8	6.9	.	9.1
Total (N)	36	29	40	22

G4f: Satisfaction: Campus bookstore meeting course needs	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	3.1	3.1	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	23.5	9.7	15.8	9.5
3: Satisfied (%)	70.6	87.1	76.3	81.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	5.9	3.2	5.3	4.8
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	.	2.6	4.8
Total (N)	34	31	38	21

G4g: Satisfaction: Availability of funds to present work	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.2	2.0	2.3	2.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.7	3.1	2.7	.
3: Satisfied (%)	28.9	21.9	35.1	38.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	42.2	46.9	48.6	47.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	22.2	28.1	13.5	14.3
Total (N)	45	32	37	21

G4h: Satisfaction: Opportunities for scholarly/professional leave	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.5	2.5	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	16.0	3.6	.	12.5
3: Satisfied (%)	48.0	53.6	56.3	68.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	24.0	35.7	40.6	12.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	12.0	7.1	3.1	6.3
Total (N)	25	28	32	16

G4i: Satisfaction: Financial support for scholarly/professional leave	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.1	2.3	2.3	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	5.3	3.4	.	11.8
3: Satisfied (%)	21.1	34.5	39.3	47.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	47.4	48.3	50.0	23.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	26.3	13.8	10.7	17.6
Total (N)	19	29	28	17

G4j: Satisfaction: Leadership development opportunities	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.4	2.5	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	4.0	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	85.0	48.0	59.3	61.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	15.0	32.0	33.3	38.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	16.0	7.4	.
Total (N)	20	25	27	13

G4k: Satisfaction: Support for dept assessment Activities	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8	2.6	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	3.4	2.9	2.9	10.5
3: Satisfied (%)	72.4	76.5	60.0	63.2
2: Dissatisfied (%)	24.1	20.6	28.6	26.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	.	8.6	.
Total (N)	29	34	35	19

G4l: Satisfaction: Availability of/access to materials via NCSU Libraries	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.4	3.4	3.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	34.1	47.4	45.0	40.9
3: Satisfied (%)	59.1	44.7	52.5	59.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	6.8	5.3	2.5	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	2.6	.	.
Total (N)	44	38	40	22

G4m: Satisfaction: Support with dealing with student concerns	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.1	2.9	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	11.4	20.0	13.2	15.8
3: Satisfied (%)	82.9	71.4	63.2	73.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	2.9	2.9	21.1	10.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.9	5.7	2.6	.
Total (N)	35	35	38	19

G4n: Satisfaction: Support for technology transfer	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	2.0	2.5	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	3.6	5.6	5.6
3: Satisfied (%)	58.6	35.7	50.0	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	17.2	17.9	33.3	11.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	24.1	42.9	11.1	16.7
Total (N)	29	28	36	18

G5: Assignment of formal mentor	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Yes (%)	42.9	18.4	7.0	4.5
No (%)	55.1	76.3	90.7	95.5
Don't know (%)	2.0	5.3	2.3	.
Total (N)	49	38	43	22

G6: Mentor helpfulness	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	2.9	2.7	4.0
4: Very helpful (%)	52.4	42.9	.	100.0
3: Somewhat helpful (%)	33.3	28.6	66.7	.
2: Not very helpful (%)	4.8	.	33.3	.
1: Not at all helpful (%)	9.5	28.6	.	.
Total (N)	21	7	3	1

G7a: Satisfaction: Pre-award support from college for grant/contract	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.6	2.6	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	20.0	8.8	10.3	4.5
3: Satisfied (%)	57.8	55.9	53.8	59.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	17.8	20.6	23.1	22.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	4.4	14.7	12.8	13.6
Total (N)	45	34	39	22

G7b: Satisfaction: Post-award support from college for grant/contract	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.7	2.6	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	12.5	8.8	7.7	.
3: Satisfied (%)	65.0	55.9	56.4	68.2
2: Dissatisfied (%)	15.0	29.4	23.1	18.2
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	7.5	5.9	12.8	13.6
Total (N)	40	34	39	22

G7c: Satisfaction: Pre-award University support for grant/contract	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.4	2.5	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	7.5	3.3	2.8	.
3: Satisfied (%)	70.0	46.7	55.6	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	20.0	36.7	30.6	19.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.5	13.3	11.1	14.3
Total (N)	40	30	36	21

G7d: Satisfaction: Post-award University support for grant/contract	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.6	2.5	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	11.1	3.6	5.4	.
3: Satisfied (%)	55.6	57.1	54.1	71.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	22.2	35.7	29.7	14.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	11.1	3.6	10.8	14.3
Total (N)	36	28	37	21

G7e: Satisfaction: Allocation of indirect grant costs to investigator	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.0	1.6	1.8	1.9
3: Satisfied (%)	31.4	6.1	23.7	31.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	37.1	45.5	31.6	27.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	31.4	48.5	44.7	40.9
Total (N)	35	33	38	22

G7f: Satisfaction: Allocation of indirect grant costs to department	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.1	1.5	1.9	2.0
3: Satisfied (%)	34.5	4.0	26.5	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	37.9	44.0	35.3	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	27.6	52.0	38.2	33.3
Total (N)	29	25	34	18

G7g: Satisfaction: PI control over indirect cost allocation	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	1.8	1.5	1.6	1.7
3: Satisfied (%)	19.4	.	18.4	25.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	38.9	47.1	23.7	20.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	41.7	52.9	57.9	55.0
Total (N)	36	34	38	20

Back to Top

Section H: Performance Review, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure

H1: Faculty performance review standards are clearly stated	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0	2.9	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	26.1	32.4	24.4	38.1
3: Agree (%)	43.5	43.2	48.8	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	23.9	13.5	17.1	23.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.5	10.8	9.8	4.8
Total (N)	46	37	41	21

H2: Faculty performance review procedures are clearly stated	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.2	3.1	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	28.3	39.5	29.3	38.1
3: Agree (%)	54.3	44.7	53.7	47.6
2: Disagree (%)	13.0	10.5	12.2	9.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.3	5.3	4.9	4.8
Total (N)	46	38	41	21

H3: SME is consistent with departmental vision	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.2	2.9	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.6	35.3	21.9	27.8
3: Agree (%)	61.5	55.9	53.1	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	5.1	5.9	18.8	5.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.7	2.9	6.3	.
Total (N)	39	34	32	18

H4: SME is consistent with departmental promotion standards	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.2	3.1	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	24.3	36.7	30.0	37.5
3: Agree (%)	67.6	53.3	50.0	56.3
2: Disagree (%)	.	6.7	16.7	6.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.1	3.3	3.3	.
Total (N)	37	30	30	16

H5a: Performance Review feedback appropriately based on SME	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.0	2.8	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	26.5	32.3	11.5	29.4
3: Agree (%)	55.9	41.9	65.4	41.2
2: Disagree (%)	14.7	16.1	15.4	17.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.9	9.7	7.7	11.8
Total (N)	34	31	26	17

H5b: Performance Review feedback helpful for professional Development	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9	2.7	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	22.2	26.5	9.4	27.8
3: Agree (%)	50.0	41.2	59.4	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	25.0	23.5	25.0	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.8	8.8	6.3	5.6
Total (N)	36	34	32	18

H5c: Performance Review feedback corresponds with my perceptions of own performance	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8	2.9	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	20.0	23.5	12.9	16.7
3: Agree (%)	62.9	44.1	64.5	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	8.6	23.5	22.6	27.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.6	8.8	.	5.6
Total (N)	35	34	31	18

H5d: Performance Review feedback helps understand relation to other faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.6	2.5	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	17.6	17.6	9.1	16.7
3: Agree (%)	38.2	38.2	42.4	38.9
2: Disagree (%)	35.3	29.4	33.3	38.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.8	14.7	15.2	5.6
Total (N)	34	34	33	18

H5e: Feedback given appropriate weight in merit raises	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.7	2.8	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	11.4	15.2	10.0	11.8
3: Agree (%)	54.3	57.6	66.7	41.2
2: Disagree (%)	14.3	6.1	16.7	41.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	20.0	21.2	6.7	5.9
Total (N)	35	33	30	17

H6: Understanding of current Academic Tenure Policy	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.9	2.9	3.2
4: Very well (%)	10.9	34.2	25.0	42.9
3: Fairly well (%)	54.3	34.2	47.5	33.3
2: Not very well (%)	23.9	23.7	20.0	23.8
1: Not at all (%)	10.9	7.9	7.5	.
Total (N)	46	38	40	21

H7_1: Participated in RPT process as candidate	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	52.1	13.2	47.6	52.4
Yes (%)	47.9	86.8	52.4	47.6
Total (N)	48	38	42	21

H7_2: Participated in RPT process as voter	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	89.6	15.8	16.7	9.5
Yes (%)	10.4	84.2	83.3	90.5
Total (N)	48	38	42	21

H7_3: Participated in RPT process as review committee member	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	93.8	52.6	38.1	47.6
Yes (%)	6.3	47.4	61.9	52.4
Total (N)	48	38	42	21

H7_4: Have never participated in RPT process	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	56.3	94.7	95.2	95.2
Yes (%)	43.8	5.3	4.8	4.8
Total (N)	48	38	42	21

H8: Understand dept RPT standards	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	3.2	3.4	3.5
4: Very well (%)	26.1	47.4	51.2	52.4
3: Fairly well (%)	43.5	31.6	39.0	42.9
2: Not very well (%)	21.7	13.2	7.3	4.8
1: Not at all (%)	8.7	7.9	2.4	.
Total (N)	46	38	41	21

H9: Understand dept RPT procedures	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.4	3.5	3.6
4: Very well (%)	24.4	50.0	53.7	66.7
3: Fairly well (%)	53.3	44.7	41.5	28.6
2: Not very well (%)	17.8	2.6	2.4	4.8
1: Not at all (%)	4.4	2.6	2.4	.
Total (N)	45	38	41	21

H10: Departmental RPT standards applied consistently/fairly	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.1	3.1	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	20.0	37.1	33.3	28.6
3: Agree (%)	66.7	42.9	51.3	47.6
2: Disagree (%)	10.0	11.4	7.7	14.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.3	8.6	7.7	9.5
Total (N)	30	35	39	21

H11: Departmental RPT procedures applied consistently/fairly	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.3	3.1	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	32.3	45.7	28.2	28.6
3: Agree (%)	61.3	42.9	56.4	52.4
2: Disagree (%)	6.5	2.9	10.3	14.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	8.6	5.1	4.8
Total (N)	31	35	39	21

H12a: Sufficient resources for teaching/mentoring students	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.7	2.6	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	14.0	5.7	9.8	5.3
3: Agree (%)	65.1	60.0	48.8	52.6
2: Disagree (%)	20.9	34.3	34.1	42.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	7.3	.
Total (N)	43	35	41	19

H12b: Sufficient resources for discovery of knowledge	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.6	2.7	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	6.3	12.1	11.4	5.6
3: Agree (%)	59.4	39.4	57.1	55.6
2: Disagree (%)	31.3	45.5	22.9	38.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.1	3.0	8.6	.
Total (N)	32	33	35	18

H12c: Sufficient resources for creative artistry and literature	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.3	2.5	2.3
3: Agree (%)	100.0	50.0	60.0	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	33.3	30.0	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	16.7	10.0	25.0
Total (N)	5	6	10	4

H12d: Sufficient resources for tech/managerial innovation	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.3	2.4	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	3.8	7.1	7.4	.
3: Agree (%)	57.7	42.9	37.0	45.5
2: Disagree (%)	30.8	25.0	40.7	36.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.7	25.0	14.8	18.2
Total (N)	26	28	27	11

H12e: Sufficient resources for extension/engagement	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.6	2.4	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	.	3.8	.
3: Agree (%)	56.5	66.7	50.0	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	39.1	29.6	26.9	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.3	3.7	19.2	8.3
Total (N)	23	27	26	12

H12f: Sufficient resources for professional service	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.6	2.3	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	9.1	.	5.3
3: Agree (%)	59.3	51.5	40.0	36.8
2: Disagree (%)	29.6	27.3	48.6	52.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	11.1	12.1	11.4	5.3
Total (N)	27	33	35	19

H13a: Department rewards teaching/mentoring of students	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.6	2.6	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	8.6	15.8	7.5	10.0
3: Agree (%)	74.3	39.5	50.0	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	17.1	28.9	35.0	35.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	15.8	7.5	15.0
Total (N)	35	38	40	20

H13b: Department rewards discovery of knowledge	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9	3.2	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	17.6	27.8	31.4	27.8
3: Agree (%)	58.8	44.4	54.3	55.6
2: Disagree (%)	17.6	13.9	14.3	11.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.9	13.9	.	5.6
Total (N)	34	36	35	18

H13c: Department rewards creative artistry and literature	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.4	2.9	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	28.6	12.5	.
3: Agree (%)	100.0	.	62.5	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	.	57.1	25.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	14.3	.	33.3
Total (N)	4	7	8	3

H13d: Department rewards tech/managerial innovation	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.6	2.8	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	4.0	13.8	4.2	7.1
3: Agree (%)	56.0	44.8	70.8	71.4
2: Disagree (%)	40.0	24.1	20.8	21.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	17.2	4.2	.
Total (N)	25	29	24	14

H13e: Department rewards extension/engagement	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.8	2.4	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	20.0	4.2	13.3
3: Agree (%)	65.2	50.0	45.8	53.3
2: Disagree (%)	30.4	16.7	33.3	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.3	13.3	16.7	13.3
Total (N)	23	30	24	15

H13f: Department rewards professional service	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.7	2.5	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	3.6	18.2	2.9	10.0
3: Agree (%)	75.0	42.4	51.4	55.0
2: Disagree (%)	17.9	30.3	40.0	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.6	9.1	5.7	10.0
Total (N)	28	33	35	20

Back to Top

Section I: Post-Tenure Review

I1_1: No experience with PTR	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Has experience (%)	7.0	62.2	90.0	95.0
No experience (%)	93.0	37.8	10.0	5.0
Total (N)	43	37	40	20

I1_2: Have had PTR Comprehensive Review	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	95.3	67.6	30.0	15.0
Yes (%)	4.7	32.4	70.0	85.0
Total (N)	43	37	40	20

I1_3: Have served on PTR committee	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	97.7	73.0	45.0	35.0
Yes (%)	2.3	27.0	55.0	65.0
Total (N)	43	37	40	20

I1_4: Have been dept/college administrator in PTR process	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	97.7	94.6	87.5	85.0
Yes (%)	2.3	5.4	12.5	15.0
Total (N)	43	37	40	20

I1_5: Had other PTR experience	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	100.0	89.2	97.5	95.0
Yes (%)	.	10.8	2.5	5.0
Total (N)	43	37	40	20

I2a: Easy to find PTR information on NCSU website	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	3.1	2.9	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.5	25.0	11.1	20.0
3: Agree (%)	68.4	57.1	75.0	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	21.1	17.9	11.1	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	2.8	.
Total (N)	19	28	36	20

I2b: PTR process known/understood in department	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9	2.7	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	11.1	14.3	10.5	22.2
3: Agree (%)	61.1	64.3	52.6	44.4
2: Disagree (%)	27.8	21.4	31.6	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	5.3	.
Total (N)	18	28	38	18

I2c: Departmental PTR procedures are clear	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9	2.8	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.5	13.8	10.5	21.1
3: Agree (%)	68.4	58.6	60.5	52.6
2: Disagree (%)	21.1	27.6	23.7	26.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	5.3	.
Total (N)	19	29	38	19

I2d: Departmental PTR standards are clear	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.8	2.8	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.5	14.3	13.5	27.8
3: Agree (%)	47.4	53.6	56.8	38.9
2: Disagree (%)	42.1	32.1	24.3	27.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	5.4	5.6
Total (N)	19	28	37	18

I2e: Departmental PTR procedures are followed equitably	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.0	3.0	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	20.0	26.1	12.1	33.3
3: Agree (%)	70.0	56.5	78.8	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	10.0	13.0	9.1	11.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	4.3	.	5.6
Total (N)	10	23	33	18

I2f: Departmental PTR standards are applied fairly	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0	3.1	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	20.0	28.6	14.7	33.3
3: Agree (%)	60.0	47.6	79.4	44.4
2: Disagree (%)	10.0	14.3	5.9	16.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	10.0	9.5	.	5.6
Total (N)	10	21	34	18

I2g: Dept PTR committee members are well prepared and trained	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.8	3.0	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	14.3	25.0	13.3	11.8
3: Agree (%)	57.1	40.0	76.7	41.2
2: Disagree (%)	14.3	25.0	10.0	35.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	14.3	10.0	.	11.8
Total (N)	7	20	30	17

I3: Overall satisfaction with PTR process	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	2.9	2.6	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	22.2	26.1	2.6	17.6
3: Satisfied (%)	66.7	47.8	68.4	41.2
2: Dissatisfied (%)	11.1	17.4	15.8	29.4
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	8.7	13.2	11.8
Total (N)	9	23	38	17

Back to Top

Section J: Pay and Compensation

J1a: My salary is competitive within my department	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.6	2.7	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	6.5	13.9	12.5	11.8
3: Agree (%)	61.3	47.2	46.9	58.8
2: Disagree (%)	25.8	25.0	34.4	23.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.5	13.9	6.3	5.9
Total (N)	31	36	32	17

J1b: My salary is competitive within my college	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.3	2.4	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	5.3	4.5	6.9	16.7
3: Agree (%)	47.4	40.9	37.9	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	36.8	36.4	41.4	41.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	10.5	18.2	13.8	8.3
Total (N)	19	22	29	12

J1c: My salary is competitive within NC State	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.7	3.0	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	5.6	9.5	13.0	22.2
3: Agree (%)	61.1	57.1	69.6	77.8
2: Disagree (%)	27.8	28.6	17.4	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.6	4.8	.	.
Total (N)	18	21	23	9

J1d: My salary is competitive within UNC system	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.4	2.1	2.5	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	5.3	5.0	5.0	22.2
3: Agree (%)	36.8	30.0	50.0	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	47.4	30.0	35.0	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	10.5	35.0	10.0	11.1
Total (N)	19	20	20	9

J1e: My salary is competitive within discipline at comparable institutions	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	1.9	1.6	1.8	1.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	2.9	.	6.3	.
3: Agree (%)	25.7	10.0	3.1	14.3
2: Disagree (%)	28.6	40.0	56.3	57.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	42.9	50.0	34.4	28.6
Total (N)	35	30	32	14

J2: Understand how faculty salaries determined	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.1	2.3	2.4	2.5
4: Very well (%)	4.3	7.9	14.6	14.3
3: Fairly well (%)	34.8	44.7	34.1	38.1
2: Not very well (%)	28.3	21.1	31.7	28.6
1: Not at all (%)	32.6	26.3	19.5	19.0
Total (N)	46	38	41	21

J3: My department links salary increase to meritorious performance	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8	2.9	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	8.6	22.2	20.0	10.0
3: Agree (%)	71.4	50.0	51.4	55.0
2: Disagree (%)	8.6	13.9	25.7	35.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	11.4	13.9	2.9	.
Total (N)	35	36	35	20

J4: I have access to benefits information	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	3.4	3.2	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	21.7	39.5	31.7	23.8
3: Agree (%)	73.9	57.9	61.0	71.4
2: Disagree (%)	4.3	2.6	7.3	4.8
Total (N)	46	38	41	21

J5: Healthcare benefits are competitive with other institutions	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	1.9	1.6	2.0	1.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	7.3	.	3.0	.
3: Agree (%)	12.2	17.6	30.3	22.2
2: Disagree (%)	39.0	23.5	30.3	27.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	41.5	58.8	36.4	50.0
Total (N)	41	34	33	18

J6: Retirement programs are competitive with other institutions	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.2	2.2	2.3	1.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	5.4	3.2	.	.
3: Agree (%)	40.5	45.2	50.0	26.7
2: Disagree (%)	27.0	19.4	28.1	40.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	27.0	32.3	21.9	33.3
Total (N)	37	31	32	15

J7: Voluntary benefits programs are competitive with other institutions	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.6	2.6	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	3.6	4.0	3.7	.
3: Agree (%)	60.7	72.0	59.3	54.5
2: Disagree (%)	32.1	8.0	25.9	36.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.6	16.0	11.1	9.1
Total (N)	28	25	27	11

J8: I am satisfied with my compensation at NC State	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.4	2.2	2.2	2.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	2.2	.	2.4	4.8
3: Agree (%)	48.9	36.8	36.6	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	33.3	47.4	43.9	42.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	15.6	15.8	17.1	19.0
Total (N)	45	38	41	21

J9: Departmental environment enables work/personal life balance	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9	2.9	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	11.4	28.9	9.8	19.0
3: Agree (%)	70.5	39.5	73.2	57.1
2: Disagree (%)	15.9	23.7	17.1	14.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.3	7.9	.	9.5
Total (N)	44	38	41	21

J10: NCSU environment enables work/personal life balance	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8	2.8	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	4.3	21.6	7.7	14.3
3: Agree (%)	82.6	45.9	71.8	61.9
2: Disagree (%)	13.0	27.0	17.9	19.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	5.4	2.6	4.8
Total (N)	46	37	39	21

J11a: Importance of flexible work hours	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.7	3.6	3.7	3.6
4: Very important (%)	78.3	68.4	73.2	71.4
3: Somewhat important (%)	17.4	23.7	19.5	23.8
2: Not very important (%)	4.3	2.6	7.3	.
1: Not at all important (%)	.	5.3	.	4.8
Total (N)	46	38	41	21

J11b: Importance of maternity/paternity leave	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.5	3.6	3.6	3.5
4: Very important (%)	58.7	73.7	58.5	66.7
3: Somewhat important (%)	32.6	21.1	39.0	23.8
2: Not very important (%)	6.5	.	2.4	.
1: Not at all important (%)	2.2	5.3	.	9.5
Total (N)	46	38	41	21

J11c: Importance of family leave time	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.6	3.6	3.5	3.5
4: Very important (%)	63.0	63.2	55.0	61.9
3: Somewhat important (%)	34.8	34.2	40.0	33.3
2: Not very important (%)	2.2	.	5.0	.
1: Not at all important (%)	.	2.6	.	4.8
Total (N)	46	38	40	21

J11d: Importance of altering tenure clock for family concerns	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.4	3.5	3.5	3.5
4: Very important (%)	52.2	60.5	56.1	57.1
3: Somewhat important (%)	37.0	34.2	36.6	38.1
2: Not very important (%)	6.5	2.6	7.3	.
1: Not at all important (%)	4.3	2.6	.	4.8
Total (N)	46	38	41	21

J11e: Importance of childcare facility on or near campus	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	3.3	3.2	3.1
4: Very important (%)	41.3	47.4	39.0	42.9
3: Somewhat important (%)	41.3	36.8	43.9	38.1
2: Not very important (%)	10.9	10.5	17.1	9.5
1: Not at all important (%)	6.5	5.3	.	9.5
Total (N)	46	38	41	21

J11f: Importance of tuition remission for dependents	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.7	3.5	3.5	3.5
4: Very important (%)	77.3	65.8	61.0	57.1
3: Somewhat important (%)	18.2	18.4	29.3	33.3
2: Not very important (%)	2.3	13.2	9.8	9.5
1: Not at all important (%)	2.3	2.6	.	.
Total (N)	44	38	41	21

Back to Top

Section K: Campus Infrastructure/Physical Environment

K1: I have sufficient clerical/admin support in my dept	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.6	2.2	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	13.3	21.1	.	19.0
3: Agree (%)	42.2	31.6	47.5	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	28.9	34.2	27.5	38.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	15.6	13.2	25.0	9.5
Total (N)	45	38	40	21

K2: I have sufficient tech assistance	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.6	2.4	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	8.9	18.4	2.4	9.5
3: Agree (%)	55.6	42.1	46.3	47.6
2: Disagree (%)	28.9	21.1	36.6	28.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.7	18.4	14.6	14.3
Total (N)	45	38	41	21

K3: There is sufficient support staff in my college	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.8	2.4	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	2.3	16.2	5.0	14.3
3: Agree (%)	72.7	54.1	42.5	47.6
2: Disagree (%)	20.5	21.6	37.5	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.5	8.1	15.0	4.8
Total (N)	44	37	40	21

K4a: Satisfaction with office space	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.2	3.1	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	20.0	42.1	34.1	33.3
3: Satisfied (%)	68.9	39.5	46.3	42.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	8.9	13.2	17.1	23.8
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.2	5.3	2.4	.
Total (N)	45	38	41	21

K4b: Satisfaction with lab space	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.7	2.9	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	9.3	17.1	22.9	26.7
3: Satisfied (%)	58.1	45.7	54.3	53.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	20.9	25.7	17.1	20.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	11.6	11.4	5.7	.
Total (N)	43	35	35	15

K4c: Satisfaction with classrooms in which you teach	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	3.2	3.1	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	18.2	35.1	34.1	33.3
3: Satisfied (%)	59.1	51.4	48.8	42.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	20.5	10.8	12.2	14.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.3	2.7	4.9	9.5
Total (N)	44	37	41	21

K4d: Satisfaction with labs in which you teach	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9	3.1	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	14.3	30.4	40.0	25.0
3: Satisfied (%)	60.7	30.4	40.0	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	17.9	34.8	12.0	25.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	7.1	4.3	8.0	.
Total (N)	28	23	25	12

K4e: Satisfaction with maintenance of building in which you work	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.5	2.7	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	13.3	16.2	17.1	9.5
3: Satisfied (%)	53.3	40.5	43.9	57.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	17.8	24.3	29.3	28.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	15.6	18.9	9.8	4.8
Total (N)	45	37	41	21

K4f: Satisfaction with infrastructure of bldgs in which you work	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.7	2.8	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	13.3	24.3	24.4	9.5
3: Satisfied (%)	51.1	35.1	46.3	52.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	20.0	24.3	17.1	23.8
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	15.6	16.2	12.2	14.3
Total (N)	45	37	41	21

K4g: Satisfaction with availability of up-to-date equipment	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.6	2.7	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.7	15.8	17.1	9.5
3: Satisfied (%)	66.7	42.1	39.0	57.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	20.0	31.6	36.6	23.8
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.7	10.5	7.3	9.5
Total (N)	45	38	41	21

K4h: Satisfaction with availability of office supplies	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.1	2.9	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	9.1	26.3	14.6	14.3
3: Satisfied (%)	77.3	57.9	65.9	61.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	13.6	15.8	17.1	19.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	.	2.4	4.8
Total (N)	44	38	41	21

K4i: Satisfaction with availability of informal meeting space	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.9	2.9	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	11.1	21.1	14.6	14.3
3: Satisfied (%)	57.8	55.3	63.4	47.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	24.4	18.4	19.5	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.7	5.3	2.4	4.8
Total (N)	45	38	41	21

K4j: Satisfaction with dining options on campus	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	1.9	1.9	2.0	2.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	6.1	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	26.8	18.2	28.1	37.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	36.6	39.4	40.6	31.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	36.6	36.4	31.3	31.3
Total (N)	41	33	32	16

K4k: Satisfaction with availability of parking	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.6	2.5	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	4.4	5.3	2.5	.
3: Satisfied (%)	51.1	57.9	55.0	61.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	33.3	28.9	30.0	23.8
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	11.1	7.9	12.5	14.3
Total (N)	45	38	40	21

K4l: Satisfaction with cost of parking	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.4	2.3	2.0	2.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	2.2	2.6	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	48.9	47.4	30.0	23.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	40.0	28.9	42.5	52.4
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	8.9	21.1	27.5	23.8
Total (N)	45	38	40	21

K4m: Satisfaction with Wolfline	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.7	2.9	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.7	18.8	6.3	10.0
3: Satisfied (%)	60.0	50.0	81.3	70.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	26.7	12.5	12.5	20.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.7	18.8	.	.
Total (N)	15	16	16	10

K4n: Satisfaction with commute between Centennial and main	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.2	2.4	2.3	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	3.1	3.7	.	6.3
3: Satisfied (%)	31.3	44.4	51.4	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	50.0	37.0	25.7	37.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	15.6	14.8	22.9	6.3
Total (N)	32	27	35	16

K4o: Satisfaction with campus safety	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9	2.9	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	5.7	5.9	3.0	5.3
3: Satisfied (%)	82.9	73.5	84.8	89.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	11.4	20.6	9.1	5.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	.	3.0	.
Total (N)	35	34	33	19

K4p: Satisfaction with campus aesthetics	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.4	2.7	2.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	2.6	7.7	4.8
3: Satisfied (%)	61.9	55.3	56.4	47.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	31.0	23.7	30.8	28.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	7.1	18.4	5.1	19.0
Total (N)	42	38	39	21

K4q: Satisfaction with upkeep of campus grounds	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8	2.9	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	2.4	5.3	9.8	4.8
3: Satisfied (%)	85.4	78.9	68.3	71.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	9.8	7.9	19.5	19.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.4	7.9	2.4	4.8
Total (N)	41	38	41	21

K4r: Satisfaction with amount of green space	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.5	2.6	2.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	7.1	2.6	4.9	4.8
3: Satisfied (%)	66.7	60.5	58.5	47.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	21.4	21.1	31.7	28.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	4.8	15.8	4.9	19.0
Total (N)	42	38	41	21

K5a: Satisfaction with energy conservation	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.7	2.8	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	8.6	10.3	9.7	6.3
3: Satisfied (%)	60.0	58.6	64.5	75.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	28.6	24.1	22.6	12.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.9	6.9	3.2	6.3
Total (N)	35	29	31	16

K5b: Satisfaction with water conservation	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8	2.8	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	9.1	10.7	9.7	6.3
3: Satisfied (%)	69.7	64.3	67.7	75.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	18.2	21.4	16.1	18.8
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	3.0	3.6	6.5	.
Total (N)	33	28	31	16

K5c: Satisfaction with recycling efforts	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0	3.0	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	10.5	14.7	11.8	11.1
3: Satisfied (%)	68.4	73.5	73.5	72.2
2: Dissatisfied (%)	18.4	11.8	14.7	5.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.6	.	.	11.1
Total (N)	38	34	34	18

K5d: Satisfaction with alternative transportation	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.6	2.7	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	9.4	3.4	3.2	.
3: Satisfied (%)	53.1	51.7	67.7	82.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	28.1	41.4	29.0	17.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	9.4	3.4	.	.
Total (N)	32	29	31	17

K5e: Satisfaction with green building practices	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.5	2.9	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	5.3	.	5.0	.
3: Satisfied (%)	52.6	66.7	75.0	81.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	31.6	16.7	20.0	9.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	10.5	16.7	.	9.1
Total (N)	19	18	20	11

K5f: Satisfaction with use of recycled-content resources	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.8	2.9	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	5.6	.	4.8	.
3: Satisfied (%)	66.7	77.8	76.2	91.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	22.2	22.2	19.0	8.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.6	.	.	.
Total (N)	18	18	21	12

K6: Interest in hotel/conference center on Centennial Campus	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	2.8	3.2	2.6
4: A lot (%)	55.6	34.2	48.8	38.1
3: Some (%)	28.9	23.7	34.1	9.5
2: A little (%)	8.9	26.3	7.3	28.6
1: None at all (%)	6.7	15.8	9.8	23.8
Total (N)	45	38	41	21

K7: Likelihood of using conference center on Centennial Campus	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.4	3.1	3.3	2.9
4: Very likely (%)	55.6	39.5	51.2	35.0
3: Somewhat likely (%)	37.8	34.2	36.6	30.0
2: Not very likely (%)	2.2	18.4	4.9	20.0
1: Not at all likely (%)	4.4	7.9	7.3	15.0
Total (N)	45	38	41	20

Back to Top

Section L: Recreation/Wellness

L1: Satisfaction with recreation activities on campus	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.7	3.0	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	2.6	15.8	19.0
3: Satisfied (%)	64.4	71.1	68.4	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	35.6	23.7	13.2	14.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	2.6	2.6	.
Total (N)	45	38	38	21

L2: Satisfaction with cultural activities on campus	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.6	2.9	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	2.6	12.8	14.3
3: Satisfied (%)	69.6	60.5	64.1	76.2
2: Dissatisfied (%)	26.1	34.2	20.5	9.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	4.3	2.6	2.6	.
Total (N)	46	38	39	21

L3a: Satisfaction with Carmichael Gymnasium	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8	3.1	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	11.4	6.9	26.7	26.7
3: Satisfied (%)	68.6	72.4	56.7	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	11.4	17.2	16.7	6.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	8.6	3.4	.	.
Total (N)	35	29	30	15

L3b: Satisfaction with recreation space around campus	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.6	3.0	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.1	8.0	13.0	18.8
3: Satisfied (%)	72.7	52.0	69.6	62.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	21.2	32.0	17.4	18.8
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	8.0	.	.
Total (N)	33	25	23	16

L3c: Satisfaction with organized Campus Recreation Activities	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.6	2.9	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	4.5	.	8.3	27.3
3: Satisfied (%)	68.2	64.7	75.0	72.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	27.3	29.4	16.7	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	5.9	.	.
Total (N)	22	17	12	11

L3d: Satisfaction with ARTS NC State programs	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.7	3.0	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	8.7	.	12.0	6.7
3: Satisfied (%)	69.6	70.4	76.0	86.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	21.7	25.9	8.0	6.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	3.7	4.0	.
Total (N)	23	27	25	15

L3e: Satisfaction with Wolfpack athletic events	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.1	3.1	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	4.0	18.2	17.9	.
3: Satisfied (%)	88.0	72.7	75.0	84.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	8.0	9.1	3.6	15.4
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	.	3.6	.
Total (N)	25	22	28	13

L4a: How often use Carmichael Gymnasium	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	3.1	3.1	3.2
Once a week or more (%)	20.0	18.4	27.5	33.3
A few times a month (%)	13.3	2.6	7.5	4.8
A few times a semester (%)	15.6	28.9	5.0	4.8
Once a semester (%)	8.9	5.3	5.0	4.8
Once a year (%)	6.7	5.3	15.0	14.3
Never (%)	35.6	39.5	40.0	38.1
Total (N)	45	38	40	21

L4b: How often use recreational space around campus	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.7	2.3	3.0
Once a week or more (%)	6.5	15.8	5.0	9.5
A few times a month (%)	10.9	7.9	7.5	19.0
A few times a semester (%)	17.4	10.5	10.0	14.3
Once a semester (%)	6.5	7.9	15.0	4.8
Once a year (%)	17.4	13.2	10.0	23.8
Never (%)	41.3	44.7	52.5	28.6
Total (N)	46	38	40	21

L4c: How often participate in organized Campus Recreation Activities	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	1.7	1.7	1.5	1.5
Once a week or more (%)	.	2.7	.	.
A few times a month (%)	6.5	.	5.1	5.0
A few times a semester (%)	10.9	8.1	5.1	.
Once a semester (%)	2.2	13.5	5.1	10.0
Once a year (%)	10.9	2.7	5.1	10.0
Never (%)	69.6	73.0	79.5	75.0
Total (N)	46	37	39	20

L4d: How often attend ARTS NC State programs	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	1.8	2.5	2.3	2.4
A few times a month (%)	.	.	5.1	.
A few times a semester (%)	8.7	28.9	20.5	19.0
Once a semester (%)	15.2	21.1	15.4	28.6
Once a year (%)	19.6	23.7	20.5	23.8
Never (%)	56.5	26.3	38.5	28.6
Total (N)	46	38	39	21

L4e: How often attend Wolfpack athletic events	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.1	2.4	2.4	2.4
A few times a month (%)	2.2	2.6	8.1	4.8
A few times a semester (%)	17.4	31.6	18.9	23.8
Once a semester (%)	15.2	13.2	18.9	14.3
Once a year (%)	19.6	13.2	8.1	23.8
Never (%)	45.7	39.5	45.9	33.3
Total (N)	46	38	37	21

L5: Interest in designated faculty-only dining facility	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.7	2.8	2.7
4: A great deal (%)	30.4	39.5	32.5	23.8
3: Some (%)	19.6	21.1	30.0	42.9
2: A little (%)	21.7	13.2	20.0	14.3
1: None at all (%)	28.3	26.3	17.5	19.0
Total (N)	46	38	40	21

L6: Likelihood of using gym on Centennial campus	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	3.2	3.1	2.8
4: Very likely (%)	52.2	50.0	47.5	33.3
3: Somewhat likely (%)	21.7	28.9	25.0	28.6
2: Not very likely (%)	15.2	15.8	20.0	19.0
1: Not at all likely (%)	10.9	5.3	7.5	19.0
Total (N)	46	38	40	21

Back to Top

Section M: Work Activities

M1: Total hours per week spent performing job-related work (collapsed)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean # Hrs Work	58.8	61.5	57.5	57.7
more than 60 hrs (%)	28.3	40.5	20.0	23.8
51 to 60 hrs (%)	45.7	37.8	40.0	47.6
41 to 50 hrs (%)	23.9	13.5	37.5	23.8
40 hrs or less (%)	2.2	8.1	2.5	4.8
Total (N)	46	37	40	21

M2A: Proportion of total hours spent on teaching/mentoring	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean % of Time on Activity	35.4	36.4	38.5	40.2
more than 50% of time (%)	8.7	15.8	11.9	14.3
26% to 50% of time (%)	58.7	57.9	66.7	71.4
11% to 25% of time (%)	32.6	23.7	19.0	4.8
6% to 10% of time (%)	.	2.6	.	9.5
0% of time (%)	.	.	2.4	.
Total (N)	46	38	42	21

M2a_1r: Includes teaching (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	8.7	7.9	14.6	19.0
Yes (%)	91.3	92.1	85.4	81.0
Total (N)	46	38	41	21

M2a_2r: Includes professional development to improve teaching (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	58.7	60.5	63.4	47.6
Yes (%)	41.3	39.5	36.6	52.4
Total (N)	46	38	41	21

M2a_3r: Includes research projects with students (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	23.9	21.1	29.3	23.8
Yes (%)	76.1	78.9	70.7	76.2
Total (N)	46	38	41	21

M2a_4r: Includes supervising internships/field experiences (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	80.4	73.7	80.5	76.2
Yes (%)	19.6	26.3	19.5	23.8
Total (N)	46	38	41	21

M2a_5r: Includes student thesis/dissertation committee work (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	28.3	15.8	26.8	33.3
Yes (%)	71.7	84.2	73.2	66.7
Total (N)	46	38	41	21

M2B: Proportion of total hours spent advising students	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean % of Time on Activity	13.3	6.9	7.0	6.4
more than 50% of time (%)	2.2	.	.	.
26% to 50% of time (%)	13.0	2.6	2.4	.
11% to 25% of time (%)	17.4	7.9	7.1	9.5
6% to 10% of time (%)	23.9	15.8	19.0	14.3
1% to 5% of time (%)	34.8	63.2	61.9	76.2
0% of time (%)	8.7	10.5	9.5	.
Total (N)	46	38	42	21

M2b_1r: Includes formal advising (among those reporting time spent on advising)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	28.6	32.4	31.6	42.9
Yes (%)	71.4	67.6	68.4	57.1
Total (N)	42	34	38	21

M2b_2r: Includes informal advising (among those reporting time spent on advising)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	26.2	26.5	36.8	33.3
Yes (%)	73.8	73.5	63.2	66.7
Total (N)	42	34	38	21

M2C: Proportion of total hours spent on research/scholarly Activities	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean % of Time on Activity	33.7	34.3	30.6	27.5
more than 50% of time (%)	8.7	2.6	2.4	4.8
26% to 50% of time (%)	56.5	71.1	59.5	47.6
11% to 25% of time (%)	17.4	13.2	23.8	23.8
6% to 10% of time (%)	.	5.3	.	4.8
1% to 5% of time (%)	8.7	.	2.4	9.5
0% of time (%)	8.7	7.9	11.9	9.5
Total (N)	46	38	42	21

M2D: Proportion of total hours spent on creative artistry/literature	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean % of Time on Activity	0.8	1.1	1.3	1.4
11% to 25% of time (%)	.	2.6	2.4	4.8
6% to 10% of time (%)	4.3	2.6	4.8	4.8
1% to 5% of time (%)	10.9	5.3	4.8	.
0% of time (%)	84.8	89.5	88.1	90.5
Total (N)	46	38	42	21

M2E: Proportion of total hours spent on extension/engagement/econ dev	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean % of Time on Activity	3.6	1.8	2.5	3.7
26% to 50% of time (%)	4.3	.	2.4	4.8
11% to 25% of time (%)	.	.	.	4.8
6% to 10% of time (%)	4.3	7.9	7.1	9.5
1% to 5% of time (%)	28.3	21.1	21.4	9.5
0% of time (%)	63.0	71.1	69.0	71.4
Total (N)	46	38	42	21

M2e_1r: Includes service learning teaching/mentoring (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	58.8	72.7	69.2	83.3
Yes (%)	41.2	27.3	30.8	16.7
Total (N)	17	11	13	6

M2e_2r: Includes extension education/non-credit programs (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	58.8	81.8	61.5	33.3
Yes (%)	41.2	18.2	38.5	66.7
Total (N)	17	11	13	6

M2e_3r: Includes economic development training/tech assistance (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	70.6	100.0	69.2	83.3
Yes (%)	29.4	.	30.8	16.7
Total (N)	17	11	13	6

M2e_4r: Includes partnering with private sector - job/investment creation (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	58.8	54.5	61.5	66.7
Yes (%)	41.2	45.5	38.5	33.3
Total (N)	17	11	13	6

M2e_5r: Public service grants/contracts (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	76.5	90.9	84.6	83.3
Yes (%)	23.5	9.1	15.4	16.7
Total (N)	17	11	13	6

M2F: Proportion of total hours spent on service work	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean % of Time on Activity	10.0	13.1	11.4	9.4
26% to 50% of time (%)	4.3	5.3	4.8	.
11% to 25% of time (%)	21.7	31.6	31.0	28.6
6% to 10% of time (%)	30.4	50.0	28.6	19.0
1% to 5% of time (%)	37.0	13.2	31.0	47.6
0% of time (%)	6.5	.	4.8	4.8
Total (N)	46	38	42	21

M2f_1r: Includes advising student groups (among those reporting time spent on service work)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	69.8	73.7	67.5	65.0
Yes (%)	30.2	26.3	32.5	35.0
Total (N)	43	38	40	20

M2f_2r: Includes dept/college/university committees (among those reporting time spent on service work)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	23.3	13.2	10.0	25.0
Yes (%)	76.7	86.8	90.0	75.0
Total (N)	43	38	40	20

M2f_3r: Includes professional service (among those reporting time spent on service work)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	30.2	26.3	35.0	60.0
Yes (%)	69.8	73.7	65.0	40.0
Total (N)	43	38	40	20

M2f_4r: Includes academic program assessment activities (among those reporting time spent on service work)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	79.1	68.4	67.5	70.0
Yes (%)	20.9	31.6	32.5	30.0
Total (N)	43	38	40	20

M2f_5r: Includes other university service (among those reporting time spent on service work)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	83.7	65.8	70.0	85.0
Yes (%)	16.3	34.2	30.0	15.0
Total (N)	43	38	40	20

M2G: Proportion of total hours spent on tech/managerial innovation	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean % of Time on Activity	1.0	0.8	1.4	0.4
6% to 10% of time (%)	.	2.6	2.4	.
1% to 5% of time (%)	28.3	15.8	28.6	14.3
0% of time (%)	71.7	81.6	69.0	85.7
Total (N)	46	38	42	21

M2H: Proportion of total hours spent on dept/college admin duties	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean % of Time on Activity	2.2	5.5	5.1	11.1