North Carolina State University
2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey:

Results for the College of Engineering
by Race/Ethnicity 1

To skip directly to a particular section, select the section below.

Section B: Image and Vision	Section I: Post-Tenure Review
Section C: Leadership	Section J: Pay and Compensation
Section D: Faculty-Administration Relationships	Section K: Campus Infrastructure/Physical Environment
Section E: Diversity/Multiculturalism	Section L: Recreation/Wellness
Section F: Working Relationships	Section M: Work Activities
Section G: Faculty Support & Professional Development	Section N: Conclusions/Overall Satisfaction
Section H: Performance Review, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure

To download a Microsoft Word version of this document, click here.

A2: Ever held an administrative position	White	Faculty of Color
..... No (%)	67.2	88.9
..... Yes (%)	32.8	11.1
Total (N)	119	45

Section B: Image and Vision

B1a: Department doing good job of recruiting faculty	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.2	20.5
3: Agree (%)	54.8	59.1
2: Disagree (%)	17.4	15.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.6	4.5
Total (N)	115	44

B1b: Department creating culture where faculty can develop to full potential	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	16.8	14.0
3: Agree (%)	47.8	55.8
2: Disagree (%)	28.3	18.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.1	11.6
Total (N)	113	43

B1c: Department retaining most effective and productive faculty	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	21.6	16.3
3: Agree (%)	54.1	46.5
2: Disagree (%)	21.6	30.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.7	7.0
Total (N)	111	43

B2a: Department national reputation for undergraduate educ	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.8	3.6
5: Very strong (%)	17.2	9.1
4: Strong (%)	50.9	45.5
3: Average (%)	27.6	40.9
2: Weak (%)	3.4	2.3
1: Very weak (%)	0.9	2.3
Total (N)	116	44

B2b: Department national reputation for graduate education	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.7	3.6
5: Very strong (%)	13.8	8.9
4: Strong (%)	47.4	48.9
3: Average (%)	32.8	37.8
2: Weak (%)	6.0	2.2
1: Very weak (%)	.	2.2
Total (N)	116	45

B2c: Department national reputation for research & scholarly activity	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.7	3.6
5: Very strong (%)	15.7	6.7
4: Strong (%)	49.6	53.3
3: Average (%)	28.7	35.6
2: Weak (%)	5.2	2.2
1: Very weak (%)	0.9	2.2
Total (N)	115	45

B2d: Department national reputation for creative artistry and literature	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.1
5: Very strong (%)	9.7	.
4: Strong (%)	19.4	29.4
3: Average (%)	45.2	52.9
2: Weak (%)	22.6	17.6
1: Very weak (%)	3.2	.
Total (N)	31	17

B2e: Department national reputation for tech & managerial innovation	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	3.3
5: Very strong (%)	12.9	2.6
4: Strong (%)	36.6	38.5
3: Average (%)	34.4	43.6
2: Weak (%)	15.1	15.4
1: Very weak (%)	1.1	.
Total (N)	93	39

B2f: Department national reputation for extension & engagement	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.4	3.5
5: Very strong (%)	9.8	7.7
4: Strong (%)	37.3	41.0
3: Average (%)	42.2	41.0
2: Weak (%)	7.8	10.3
1: Very weak (%)	2.9	.
Total (N)	102	39

B2g: Department national reputation for contrib to econ Development	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.4	3.2
5: Very strong (%)	12.8	5.9
4: Strong (%)	31.9	26.5
3: Average (%)	38.3	52.9
2: Weak (%)	13.8	14.7
1: Very weak (%)	3.2	.
Total (N)	94	34

B3a: Grade undergraduate majors' ability to meet prog demands	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.9	3.9
A (%)	10.2	18.2
B (%)	69.5	54.5
C (%)	17.8	22.7
D (%)	2.5	4.5
Total (N)	118	44

B3b: Grade graduate student ability to meet prog demands	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	4.2	4.1
A (%)	27.8	24.4
B (%)	62.6	64.4
C (%)	9.6	11.1
Total (N)	115	45

B3c: Grade demonstrated professional ability of faculty	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	4.3	4.2
A (%)	40.5	26.7
B (%)	50.0	64.4
C (%)	9.5	6.7
D (%)	.	2.2
Total (N)	116	45

B3d: Grade professional achievement of faculty	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	4.3	4.0
A (%)	38.3	13.3
B (%)	51.3	73.3
C (%)	9.6	11.1
D (%)	0.9	2.2
Total (N)	115	45

B3e: Grade own demonstrated professional ability	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	4.4	4.4
A (%)	45.7	42.2
B (%)	48.3	53.3
C (%)	5.2	4.4
F (%)	0.9	.
Total (N)	116	45

B3f: Grade own professional achievement	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	4.3	4.3
A (%)	41.4	40.0
B (%)	49.1	53.3
C (%)	7.8	6.7
D (%)	0.9	.
F (%)	0.9	.
Total (N)	116	45

B4: Department's vision for the future	White	Faculty of Color
Clear vision; actively working toward goals (%)	29.4	20.0
Vision with slow progress (%)	33.6	51.1
No clear vision (%)	30.3	20.0
Not familiar (%)	6.7	8.9
Total (N)	119	45

B5: Agreement with department vision for future	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	27.0	25.8
3: Agree (%)	70.3	71.0
2: Disagree (%)	2.7	3.2
Total (N)	74	31

B6: College's vision for the future	White	Faculty of Color
Clear vision; actively working toward goals (%)	10.9	4.5
Vision with slow progress (%)	34.5	52.3
No clear vision (%)	29.4	6.8
Not familiar (%)	25.2	36.4
Total (N)	119	44

B7a: Department change in next five years	White	Faculty of Color
Change for the better (%)	64.4	60.0
Change for the worse (%)	10.2	15.6
Not really change (%)	25.4	24.4
Total (N)	118	45

B7b: College change in next five years	White	Faculty of Color
Change for the better (%)	50.8	64.4
Change for the worse (%)	5.1	4.4
Not really change (%)	44.1	31.1
Total (N)	118	45

B7c: NC State change in next five years	White	Faculty of Color
Change for the better (%)	33.9	48.9
Change for the worse (%)	7.6	2.2
Not really change (%)	58.5	48.9
Total (N)	118	45

Section C: Leadership

C1a: Dept admin communication with faculty	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	20.7	20.5
3: Good (%)	44.8	45.5
2: Fair (%)	22.4	27.3
1: Poor (%)	12.1	6.8
Total (N)	116	44

C1b: Dept admin seek faculty input for dept vision	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	29.8	22.7
3: Good (%)	30.7	47.7
2: Fair (%)	24.6	18.2
1: Poor (%)	14.9	11.4
Total (N)	114	44

C1c: Dept admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	21.8	17.1
3: Good (%)	36.4	51.2
2: Fair (%)	29.1	17.1
1: Poor (%)	12.7	14.6
Total (N)	110	41

C1d: Dept admin delegate dept responsibility to faculty	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	19.5	19.5
3: Good (%)	49.6	51.2
2: Fair (%)	24.8	14.6
1: Poor (%)	6.2	14.6
Total (N)	113	41

C1e: Dept admin grant faculty autonomy	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	39.6	23.3
3: Good (%)	41.4	51.2
2: Fair (%)	14.4	16.3
1: Poor (%)	4.5	9.3
Total (N)	111	43

C1f: Dept admin set clear and explicit priorities	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	12.7	14.6
3: Good (%)	41.8	39.0
2: Fair (%)	32.7	36.6
1: Poor (%)	12.7	9.8
Total (N)	110	41

C1g: Dept admin appreciate your contrib to mission	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	27.9	25.0
3: Good (%)	40.5	43.2
2: Fair (%)	21.6	18.2
1: Poor (%)	9.9	13.6
Total (N)	111	44

C1h: Dept admin conflict resolution	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.4
4: Excellent (%)	18.0	12.1
3: Good (%)	32.0	33.3
2: Fair (%)	37.0	33.3
1: Poor (%)	13.0	21.2
Total (N)	100	33

C1i: Dept admin provide necessary resources	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	12.0	11.4
3: Good (%)	47.0	45.5
2: Fair (%)	29.9	34.1
1: Poor (%)	11.1	9.1
Total (N)	117	44

C1j: Dept admin allocate resources fairly	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	13.2	11.6
3: Good (%)	58.5	48.8
2: Fair (%)	22.6	32.6
1: Poor (%)	5.7	7.0
Total (N)	106	43

C1k: Dept admin serve as advocate for dept to college	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	3.1
4: Excellent (%)	42.3	35.1
3: Good (%)	41.3	43.2
2: Fair (%)	13.5	18.9
1: Poor (%)	2.9	2.7
Total (N)	104	37

C1l: Dept admin support academic freedom	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.4	3.1
4: Excellent (%)	53.8	29.3
3: Good (%)	39.4	53.7
2: Fair (%)	2.9	14.6
1: Poor (%)	3.8	2.4
Total (N)	104	41

C1m: Dept admin make rational decisions	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	27.9	22.0
3: Good (%)	47.7	51.2
2: Fair (%)	15.3	17.1
1: Poor (%)	9.0	9.8
Total (N)	111	41

C1n: Dept admin make equitable decisions	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	25.9	15.4
3: Good (%)	46.3	51.3
2: Fair (%)	20.4	20.5
1: Poor (%)	7.4	12.8
Total (N)	108	39

C1o: Dept admin promote diversity within dept	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	22.1	22.9
3: Good (%)	50.0	40.0
2: Fair (%)	21.2	28.6
1: Poor (%)	6.7	8.6
Total (N)	104	35

C2a: College admin communication with faculty	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	2.4
4: Excellent (%)	6.4	11.8
3: Good (%)	39.4	35.3
2: Fair (%)	39.4	35.3
1: Poor (%)	14.9	17.6
Total (N)	94	34

C2b: College admin seek faculty input for vision	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.1	2.0
4: Excellent (%)	3.8	6.5
3: Good (%)	29.5	22.6
2: Fair (%)	39.7	38.7
1: Poor (%)	26.9	32.3
Total (N)	78	31

C2c: College admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.1	2.0
4: Excellent (%)	4.4	4.0
3: Good (%)	29.4	20.0
2: Fair (%)	36.8	44.0
1: Poor (%)	29.4	32.0
Total (N)	68	25

C2d: College admin grant departmental autonomy	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	16.1	17.4
3: Good (%)	56.3	52.2
2: Fair (%)	20.7	21.7
1: Poor (%)	6.9	8.7
Total (N)	87	23

C2e: College admin set clear and explicit priorities	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.2	2.4
4: Excellent (%)	5.1	8.7
3: Good (%)	33.3	30.4
2: Fair (%)	39.7	52.2
1: Poor (%)	21.8	8.7
Total (N)	78	23

C2f: College admin appreciate your contrib to mission	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.4
4: Excellent (%)	11.7	14.3
3: Good (%)	39.0	25.0
2: Fair (%)	33.8	42.9
1: Poor (%)	15.6	17.9
Total (N)	77	28

C2g: College admin conflict resolution	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.3	2.3
4: Excellent (%)	3.8	12.5
3: Good (%)	46.2	25.0
2: Fair (%)	30.8	43.8
1: Poor (%)	19.2	18.8
Total (N)	52	16

C2h: College admin provide necessary resources	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.3	2.3
4: Excellent (%)	7.1	8.3
3: Good (%)	34.3	41.7
2: Fair (%)	37.4	19.4
1: Poor (%)	21.2	30.6
Total (N)	99	36

C2i: College admin allocate resources fairly	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.2	2.4
4: Excellent (%)	1.3	3.4
3: Good (%)	34.2	48.3
2: Fair (%)	43.4	31.0
1: Poor (%)	21.1	17.2
Total (N)	76	29

C2j: College admin serve as advocate for college to univ	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	20.9	26.1
3: Good (%)	49.3	39.1
2: Fair (%)	17.9	26.1
1: Poor (%)	11.9	8.7
Total (N)	67	23

C2k: College admin support academic freedom	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	25.0	29.6
3: Good (%)	65.3	44.4
2: Fair (%)	6.9	18.5
1: Poor (%)	2.8	7.4
Total (N)	72	27

C2l: College admin make rational decisions	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	13.3	11.5
3: Good (%)	57.3	53.8
2: Fair (%)	21.3	30.8
1: Poor (%)	8.0	3.8
Total (N)	75	26

C2m: College admin make equitable decisions	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.5
4: Excellent (%)	7.0	13.0
3: Good (%)	52.1	43.5
2: Fair (%)	29.6	26.1
1: Poor (%)	11.3	17.4
Total (N)	71	23

C2n: College admin promote diversity within college	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	16.7	22.2
3: Good (%)	57.7	48.1
2: Fair (%)	19.2	11.1
1: Poor (%)	6.4	18.5
Total (N)	78	27

C3a: Univ admin communication with faculty	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.1	2.3
4: Excellent (%)	2.0	11.1
3: Good (%)	33.7	33.3
2: Fair (%)	38.6	27.8
1: Poor (%)	25.7	27.8
Total (N)	101	36

C3b: Univ admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	1.9	2.0
4: Excellent (%)	1.3	4.8
3: Good (%)	22.1	23.8
2: Fair (%)	39.0	33.3
1: Poor (%)	37.7	38.1
Total (N)	77	21

C3c: Univ admin set clear and explicit priorities	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.1	2.5
4: Excellent (%)	1.2	11.5
3: Good (%)	36.9	50.0
2: Fair (%)	36.9	19.2
1: Poor (%)	25.0	19.2
Total (N)	84	26

C3d: Univ admin serves as advocate for univ to constituents	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	17.3	20.0
3: Good (%)	40.0	52.0
2: Fair (%)	30.7	16.0
1: Poor (%)	12.0	12.0
Total (N)	75	25

C3e: Univ admin support academic freedom	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	20.5	29.6
3: Good (%)	54.5	37.0
2: Fair (%)	18.2	29.6
1: Poor (%)	6.8	3.7
Total (N)	88	27

C3f: Univ admin make rational decisions	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	7.3	12.0
3: Good (%)	48.8	56.0
2: Fair (%)	30.5	28.0
1: Poor (%)	13.4	4.0
Total (N)	82	25

C3g: Univ admin make equitable decisions	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	2.5
4: Excellent (%)	6.7	13.6
3: Good (%)	44.0	36.4
2: Fair (%)	29.3	36.4
1: Poor (%)	20.0	13.6
Total (N)	75	22

C3h: Univ admin promote diversity within university	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	18.9	25.9
3: Good (%)	57.8	44.4
2: Fair (%)	16.7	22.2
1: Poor (%)	6.7	7.4
Total (N)	90	27

Section D: Faculty-Administration Relationships

D1a: I am encouraged to give input on curricular issues	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.4	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	57.4	42.9
3: Agree (%)	31.3	45.2
2: Disagree (%)	9.6	9.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.7	2.4
Total (N)	115	42

D1b: I am encouraged to give input on prog assessment	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.4	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	50.0	23.3
3: Agree (%)	44.0	65.1
2: Disagree (%)	5.2	7.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	0.9	4.7
Total (N)	116	43

D1c: I am encouraged to give input on dept hiring	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	38.3	27.9
3: Agree (%)	44.3	51.2
2: Disagree (%)	12.2	18.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.2	2.3
Total (N)	115	43

D1d: I am encouraged to give input on college admin appointments	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	8.6	9.3
3: Agree (%)	38.8	39.5
2: Disagree (%)	36.2	37.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	16.4	14.0
Total (N)	116	43

D1e: I am encouraged to give input on university admin appointments	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.2	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	6.1	4.7
3: Agree (%)	33.0	39.5
2: Disagree (%)	36.5	37.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	24.3	18.6
Total (N)	115	43

D2: Familiarity with academic program assessment in dept	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	3.1
4: Very familiar (%)	58.6	23.3
3: Somewhat familiar (%)	35.3	65.1
2: Not very familiar (%)	3.4	7.0
1: Not at all familiar (%)	2.6	4.7
Total (N)	116	43

D3a: Understanding of resource allocation to university	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.0	1.9
4: Very well (%)	1.7	.
3: Fairly well (%)	25.2	14.0
2: Not very well (%)	43.5	58.1
1: Not at all (%)	29.6	27.9
Total (N)	115	43

D3b: Understanding of resource allocation to college	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.0	1.9
4: Very well (%)	1.7	.
3: Fairly well (%)	19.8	7.0
2: Not very well (%)	53.4	74.4
1: Not at all (%)	25.0	18.6
Total (N)	116	43

D3c: Understanding of resource allocation to department	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	2.1
4: Very well (%)	10.3	.
3: Fairly well (%)	31.9	16.7
2: Not very well (%)	44.8	76.2
1: Not at all (%)	12.9	7.1
Total (N)	116	42

D3d: Understanding of resource allocation within department	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.6
4: Very well (%)	20.7	7.0
3: Fairly well (%)	45.7	51.2
2: Not very well (%)	29.3	37.2
1: Not at all (%)	4.3	4.7
Total (N)	116	43

D4: Faculty have sufficient input on dept resource allocation	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	8.8	2.3
3: Agree (%)	45.6	48.8
2: Disagree (%)	37.7	41.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.9	7.0
Total (N)	114	43

D5: Dept faculty searches/appointments are collegial and inclusive	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	44.7	18.6
3: Agree (%)	44.7	62.8
2: Disagree (%)	7.9	16.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.6	2.3
Total (N)	114	43

D6a: Relations between faculty in dept and dept admin	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	29.8	21.4
3: Good (%)	47.4	50.0
2: Fair (%)	14.9	16.7
1: Poor (%)	7.9	11.9
Total (N)	114	42

D6b: Relations between faculty in dept and college admin	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	7.4	12.5
3: Good (%)	54.3	56.3
2: Fair (%)	33.0	28.1
1: Poor (%)	5.3	3.1
Total (N)	94	32

D6c: Relations between faculty in dept and univ admin	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	2.5
4: Excellent (%)	2.5	9.5
3: Good (%)	47.5	47.6
2: Fair (%)	38.8	28.6
1: Poor (%)	11.3	14.3
Total (N)	80	21

D6d: Relations between all faculty and univ admin	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	2.3
4: Excellent (%)	1.3	8.7
3: Good (%)	46.2	39.1
2: Fair (%)	39.7	30.4
1: Poor (%)	12.8	21.7
Total (N)	78	23

D7a: Faculty Senate effective commun between faculty and univ admin	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	6.1	.
3: Agree (%)	43.9	64.0
2: Disagree (%)	30.5	28.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	19.5	8.0
Total (N)	82	25

D7b: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty in general	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	7.9	4.2
3: Agree (%)	42.1	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	32.9	16.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	17.1	12.5
Total (N)	76	24

D7c: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty like me	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.2	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	4.0	.
3: Agree (%)	33.3	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	37.3	26.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	25.3	23.1
Total (N)	75	26

D8: Effectiveness of university grievance procedures	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.6
4: Very effective (%)	6.7	7.1
3: Somewhat effective (%)	64.4	50.0
2: Not very effective (%)	20.0	35.7
1: Not at all effective (%)	8.9	7.1
Total (N)	45	14

D9: Importance of "ombuds" for informal conflict resolution	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	3.4
4: Very important (%)	55.2	51.2
3: Somewhat important (%)	37.9	41.9
2: Not very important (%)	5.2	4.7
1: Not at all important (%)	1.7	2.3
Total (N)	116	43

Section E: Diversity/Multiculturalism

E1: Importance of institutional emphasis on diversity/Multiculturalism	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	3.5
4: Very important (%)	46.4	52.4
3: Somewhat important (%)	36.6	42.9
2: Not very important (%)	13.4	4.8
1: Not at all important (%)	3.6	.
Total (N)	112	42

E2: Importance of diversity to enhanced learning in own classroom	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	3.1
4: Very important (%)	20.9	26.2
3: Somewhat important (%)	44.5	57.1
2: Not very important (%)	25.5	16.7
1: Not at all important (%)	9.1	.
Total (N)	110	42

E3: NCSU prepares students to live and work in diverse society	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.2	11.1
3: Agree (%)	76.5	69.4
2: Disagree (%)	12.2	16.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.0	2.8
Total (N)	98	36

E4a: My dept recruits historically underrepresented students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	23.0	16.2
3: Agree (%)	52.0	54.1
2: Disagree (%)	24.0	18.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.0	10.8
Total (N)	100	37

E4b: My dept retains historically underrepresented students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	19.6	9.4
3: Agree (%)	60.8	59.4
2: Disagree (%)	18.6	28.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.0	3.1
Total (N)	97	32

E4c: My dept supports historically underrepresented students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	18.8	14.7
3: Agree (%)	63.5	58.8
2: Disagree (%)	17.7	23.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	2.9
Total (N)	96	34

E4d: My dept recruits historically underrepresented faculty	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	22.1	15.8
3: Agree (%)	56.8	63.2
2: Disagree (%)	20.0	21.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.1	.
Total (N)	95	38

E4e: My dept retains historically underrepresented faculty	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	24.4	12.5
3: Agree (%)	55.8	65.6
2: Disagree (%)	19.8	18.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	3.1
Total (N)	86	32

E4f: My dept supports historically underrepresented faculty	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	22.9	16.7
3: Agree (%)	61.4	63.3
2: Disagree (%)	15.7	16.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	3.3
Total (N)	83	30

E5a: Dept environ accepting/respectful of age	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.4	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	48.6	27.5
3: Agree (%)	48.6	62.5
2: Disagree (%)	1.0	5.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.9	5.0
Total (N)	105	40

E5b: Dept environ accepting/respectful of disability status	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	52.3	33.3
3: Agree (%)	45.5	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	1.1	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.1	.
Total (N)	88	24

E5c: Dept environ accepting/respectful of gender	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	48.5	22.5
3: Agree (%)	48.5	72.5
2: Disagree (%)	2.9	5.0
Total (N)	103	40

E5d: Dept environ accepting/respectful of military status	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.4	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	47.6	29.4
3: Agree (%)	46.0	70.6
2: Disagree (%)	4.8	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.6	.
Total (N)	63	17

E5e: Dept environ accepting/respectful of nationality/ethnic origin	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.4	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	50.0	27.0
3: Agree (%)	45.1	62.2
2: Disagree (%)	3.9	5.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.0	5.4
Total (N)	102	37

E5f: Dept environ accepting/respectful of race and color	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	48.0	25.6
3: Agree (%)	49.0	59.0
2: Disagree (%)	2.9	10.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	5.1
Total (N)	102	39

E5g: Dept environ accepting/respectful of religion	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.4	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	46.8	33.3
3: Agree (%)	48.9	56.7
2: Disagree (%)	4.3	6.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	3.3
Total (N)	94	30

E5h: Dept environ accepting/respectful of sexual orientation	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.4	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	48.4	35.7
3: Agree (%)	46.9	64.3
2: Disagree (%)	3.1	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.6	.
Total (N)	64	14

E6a: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of age	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.6	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	58.5	35.9
3: Agree (%)	40.6	59.0
2: Disagree (%)	0.9	2.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	2.6
Total (N)	106	39

E6b: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of disability status	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	55.4	39.4
3: Agree (%)	43.5	57.6
2: Disagree (%)	1.1	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	3.0
Total (N)	92	33

E6c: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of gender	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.6	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	58.5	36.8
3: Agree (%)	40.6	60.5
2: Disagree (%)	0.9	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	2.6
Total (N)	106	38

E6d: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of military status	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	54.2	40.0
3: Agree (%)	44.4	56.0
2: Disagree (%)	1.4	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	4.0
Total (N)	72	25

E6e: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of national/ethnic origin	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.6	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	58.3	32.4
3: Agree (%)	40.8	59.5
2: Disagree (%)	1.0	2.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	5.4
Total (N)	103	37

E6f: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of race and color	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.6	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	57.7	34.2
3: Agree (%)	41.3	57.9
2: Disagree (%)	1.0	2.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	5.3
Total (N)	104	38

E6g: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of religion	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.6	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	59.4	34.3
3: Agree (%)	38.6	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	2.0	2.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	2.9
Total (N)	101	35

E6h: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of sexual orientation	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	50.0	28.6
3: Agree (%)	47.1	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	1.5	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.5	4.8
Total (N)	68	21

E7: Faculty diversity/multiculturalism enhancement of intellectual diversity in dept	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.8
4: A great deal (%)	12.8	18.9
3: Some (%)	43.1	45.9
2: A little (%)	23.9	29.7
1: Not at all (%)	20.2	5.4
Total (N)	109	37

E8: Inclusion of diversity-related topics, scholarship, etc in your courses	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	1.6	1.9
4: A great deal (%)	1.9	3.2
3: Some (%)	18.4	25.8
2: A little (%)	21.4	25.8
1: Not at all (%)	58.3	45.2
Total (N)	103	31

E9a: Interest in research, extension, art endeavors outside U.S.	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.6
4: A great deal (%)	41.1	68.3
3: Some (%)	39.3	22.0
2: A little (%)	6.3	9.8
1: None (%)	13.4	.
Total (N)	112	41

E9b: Interest in teaching study abroad	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.9
4: A great deal (%)	19.6	26.8
3: Some (%)	35.7	39.0
2: A little (%)	15.2	26.8
1: None (%)	29.5	7.3
Total (N)	112	41

E9c: Interest in participating in spring break service learning	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	1.7	2.3
4: A great deal (%)	3.6	4.9
3: Some (%)	17.9	51.2
2: A little (%)	27.7	17.1
1: None (%)	50.9	26.8
Total (N)	112	41

E9d: Interest in participating in international service projects	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.2	3.0
4: A great deal (%)	16.1	29.3
3: Some (%)	24.1	48.8
2: A little (%)	22.3	19.5
1: None (%)	37.5	2.4
Total (N)	112	41

E9e: Interest in teaching in international studies major	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	1.8	2.2
4: A great deal (%)	9.8	14.6
3: Some (%)	18.8	26.8
2: A little (%)	16.1	22.0
1: None (%)	55.4	36.6
Total (N)	112	41

E9f: Interest in advising international students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.4
4: A great deal (%)	41.4	51.2
3: Some (%)	36.0	39.0
2: A little (%)	9.0	7.3
1: None (%)	13.5	2.4
Total (N)	111	41

Section F: Working Relationships

F1: There is unity/cohesion among faculty in my department	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	27.0	12.8
3: Agree (%)	45.0	48.7
2: Disagree (%)	23.4	28.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.5	10.3
Total (N)	111	39

F2a: Good communication between my students and me	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	49.1	55.0
3: Agree (%)	50.0	45.0
2: Disagree (%)	0.9	.
Total (N)	110	40

F2b: Good communication between dept and our students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	27.4	15.4
3: Agree (%)	60.4	71.8
2: Disagree (%)	12.3	12.8
Total (N)	106	39

F2c: Good communication between faculty in my dept	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	23.9	17.5
3: Agree (%)	52.3	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	20.2	17.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.7	5.0
Total (N)	109	40

F2d: Good communication between my dept and other depts	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	8.3	8.3
3: Agree (%)	53.6	54.2
2: Disagree (%)	33.3	29.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.8	8.3
Total (N)	84	24

F2e: Good communication between my college and other colleges	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	3.8	10.5
3: Agree (%)	49.1	47.4
2: Disagree (%)	41.5	42.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.7	.
Total (N)	53	19

F3: Dept environ promotes respectful dialogue between diverse perspectives	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	34.5	30.0
3: Agree (%)	51.8	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	10.0	17.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.6	2.5
Total (N)	110	40

F4a: Frequency given/recvd teaching advice in dept past few years	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0
Frequently (%)	28.8	25.0
Sometimes (%)	51.4	52.5
Seldom (%)	15.3	17.5
Never (%)	4.5	5.0
Total (N)	111	40

F4b: Frequency given/recvd research/artistic feedback in dept past few yrs	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	2.8
Frequently (%)	39.6	22.5
Sometimes (%)	43.2	45.0
Seldom (%)	9.9	17.5
Never (%)	7.2	15.0
Total (N)	111	40

F4c: Frequency given/recvd help with dept/college bureaucracy past few yrs	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	2.8
Frequently (%)	32.4	20.0
Sometimes (%)	50.5	52.5
Seldom (%)	14.4	17.5
Never (%)	2.7	10.0
Total (N)	111	40

F4d: Frequency given/recvd help undrsnd reappointment, promotion, tenure past few yrs	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.1
Frequently (%)	37.8	20.0
Sometimes (%)	43.2	70.0
Seldom (%)	12.6	7.5
Never (%)	6.3	2.5
Total (N)	111	40

F4e: Frequency given/recvd help with work/personal balance issues past few yrs	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.2	2.2
Frequently (%)	9.0	5.0
Sometimes (%)	30.6	35.0
Seldom (%)	32.4	32.5
Never (%)	27.9	27.5
Total (N)	111	40

F5a: Frequency of collab with faculty in your dept	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.6	3.4
Frequently (%)	70.3	47.5
Sometimes (%)	22.5	40.0
Seldom (%)	5.4	12.5
Never (%)	1.8	.
Total (N)	111	40

F5b: Frequency of collab with faculty in other NCSU depts	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	2.8
Frequently (%)	34.2	22.5
Sometimes (%)	45.9	45.0
Seldom (%)	12.6	17.5
Never (%)	7.2	15.0
Total (N)	111	40

F5c: Frequency of collab with faculty from other universities	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	3.1
Frequently (%)	28.8	32.5
Sometimes (%)	37.8	50.0
Seldom (%)	20.7	10.0
Never (%)	12.6	7.5
Total (N)	111	40

F5d: Frequency of collab with non-faculty external to NCSU	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9
Frequently (%)	24.3	22.5
Sometimes (%)	41.4	47.5
Seldom (%)	21.6	25.0
Never (%)	12.6	5.0
Total (N)	111	40

Section G: Faculty Support & Professional Development

G1a: Satisfaction with level of courses	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.4	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	46.7	33.3
3: Satisfied (%)	49.5	59.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	2.8	5.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	0.9	2.6
Total (N)	107	39

G1b: Satisfaction with number of courses	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	39.8	25.0
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	9.3	25.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	0.9	.
Total (N)	108	40

G1c: Satisfaction with choice in courses	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.4	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	44.0	28.2
3: Satisfied (%)	49.5	53.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	5.5	12.8
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	0.9	5.1
Total (N)	109	39

G1d: Satisfaction with course content discretion	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.6	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	64.2	37.5
3: Satisfied (%)	33.9	60.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	1.8	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	2.5
Total (N)	109	40

G1e: Satisfaction with number of students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	30.3	22.5
3: Satisfied (%)	49.5	55.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	16.5	20.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	3.7	2.5
Total (N)	109	40

G1f: Satisfaction with quality of undergraduates	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	9.3	8.3
3: Satisfied (%)	68.5	58.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	19.4	25.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.8	8.3
Total (N)	108	36

G1g: Satisfaction with quality of graduate students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	20.0	13.2
3: Satisfied (%)	69.5	73.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	10.5	13.2
Total (N)	105	38

G1h: Satisfaction with access to grad TAs	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	19.8	12.8
3: Satisfied (%)	59.4	53.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	19.8	25.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	0.9	7.7
Total (N)	106	39

G1i: Satisfaction with access to grad RAs	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	23.0	25.6
3: Satisfied (%)	63.0	35.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	12.0	38.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.0	.
Total (N)	100	39

G2a: NCSU supports innovative teaching	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	29.1	22.5
3: Agree (%)	54.4	57.5
2: Disagree (%)	12.6	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.9	.
Total (N)	103	40

G2b: NCSU supports innovative research and scholarly activity	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	35.2	22.5
3: Agree (%)	50.9	52.5
2: Disagree (%)	10.2	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.7	5.0
Total (N)	108	40

G2c: NCSU supports innovative creative artistry and literature	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	9.5	25.0
3: Agree (%)	61.9	62.5
2: Disagree (%)	19.0	12.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.5	.
Total (N)	21	8

G2d: NCSU supports innovative extension/engagement/econ dev activity	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	16.5	13.8
3: Agree (%)	65.8	75.9
2: Disagree (%)	13.9	10.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.8	.
Total (N)	79	29

G3a: NCSU rewards innovative teaching	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	8.4	5.9
3: Agree (%)	50.5	52.9
2: Disagree (%)	29.9	32.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	11.2	8.8
Total (N)	107	34

G3b: NCSU rewards innovative research and scholarly activity	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	42.5	7.9
3: Agree (%)	41.5	63.2
2: Disagree (%)	9.4	21.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.6	7.9
Total (N)	106	38

G3c: NCSU rewards innovative creative artistry and literature	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	15.8	.
3: Agree (%)	52.6	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	26.3	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.3	.
Total (N)	19	6

G3d: NCSU rewards innovative extension/engagement/econ dev activity	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	16.2	.
3: Agree (%)	51.5	47.6
2: Disagree (%)	23.5	47.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.8	4.8
Total (N)	68	21

G4a: Satisfaction: Availability of classroom technology	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	37.4	30.8
3: Satisfied (%)	50.5	56.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	8.4	12.8
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	3.7	.
Total (N)	107	39

G4b: Satisfaction: Teaching reduction for scholarly/prof growth	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.5	7.1
3: Satisfied (%)	59.1	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	23.7	32.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	10.8	10.7
Total (N)	93	28

G4c: Satisfaction: Teaching workshop/seminar opportunities	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	15.4	19.4
3: Satisfied (%)	76.0	69.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	6.7	8.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	1.9	2.8
Total (N)	104	36

G4d: Satisfaction: Avail of funds to attend teaching conference/wrkshp	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.2	2.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	1.3	4.3
3: Satisfied (%)	39.0	21.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	41.6	39.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	18.2	34.8
Total (N)	77	23

G4e: Satisfaction: Learning technology training/support	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	15.6	9.7
3: Satisfied (%)	72.9	67.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	7.3	19.4
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	4.2	3.2
Total (N)	96	31

G4f: Satisfaction: Campus bookstore meeting course needs	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	16.8	10.3
3: Satisfied (%)	76.8	82.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	4.2	6.9
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.1	.
Total (N)	95	29

G4g: Satisfaction: Availability of funds to present work	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.2	2.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	1.0	11.1
3: Satisfied (%)	34.3	19.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	47.5	41.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	17.2	27.8
Total (N)	99	36

G4h: Satisfaction: Opportunities for scholarly/professional leave	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	3.9	16.7
3: Satisfied (%)	61.0	37.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	28.6	37.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.5	8.3
Total (N)	77	24

G4i: Satisfaction: Financial support for scholarly/professional leave	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.3	2.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	2.9	8.7
3: Satisfied (%)	40.0	21.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	40.0	56.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	17.1	13.0
Total (N)	70	23

G4j: Satisfaction: Leadership development opportunities	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	1.6	.
3: Satisfied (%)	65.1	54.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	27.0	36.4
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.3	9.1
Total (N)	63	22

G4k: Satisfaction: Support for dept assessment activities	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	5.6	.
3: Satisfied (%)	67.4	71.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	23.6	28.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	3.4	.
Total (N)	89	28

G4l: Satisfaction: Availability of/access to materials via NCSU Libraries	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.4	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	45.7	30.8
3: Satisfied (%)	51.4	59.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	2.9	7.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	2.6
Total (N)	105	39

G4m: Satisfaction: Support with dealing with student concerns	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	14.7	15.6
3: Satisfied (%)	73.7	68.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	9.5	9.4
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.1	6.3
Total (N)	95	32

G4n: Satisfaction: Support for technology transfer	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.3	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	3.4	4.3
3: Satisfied (%)	48.9	60.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	20.5	26.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	27.3	8.7
Total (N)	88	23

G5: Assignment of formal mentor	White	Faculty of Color
Yes (%)	17.0	32.5
No (%)	81.3	62.5
Don't know (%)	1.8	5.0
Total (N)	112	40

G6: Mentor helpfulness	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	3.2
4: Very helpful (%)	47.4	46.2
3: Somewhat helpful (%)	31.6	38.5
2: Not very helpful (%)	10.5	.
1: Not at all helpful (%)	10.5	15.4
Total (N)	19	13

G7a: Satisfaction: Pre-award support from college for grant/contract	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	12.7	10.5
3: Satisfied (%)	56.9	55.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	19.6	23.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	10.8	10.5
Total (N)	102	38

G7b: Satisfaction: Post-award support from college for grant/contract	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	11.0	.
3: Satisfied (%)	59.0	65.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	19.0	28.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	11.0	5.7
Total (N)	100	35

G7c: Satisfaction: Pre-award University support for grant/contract	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	4.4	2.8
3: Satisfied (%)	62.6	52.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	24.2	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	8.8	11.1
Total (N)	91	36

G7d: Satisfaction: Post-award University support for grant/contract	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.7	3.1
3: Satisfied (%)	60.0	53.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	25.6	28.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	7.8	15.6
Total (N)	90	32

G7e: Satisfaction: Allocation of indirect grant costs to investigator	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	1.9	1.7
3: Satisfied (%)	24.0	18.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	38.5	28.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	37.5	53.1
Total (N)	96	32

G7f: Satisfaction: Allocation of indirect grant costs to department	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	1.9	1.8
3: Satisfied (%)	23.0	31.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	42.5	15.8
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	34.5	52.6
Total (N)	87	19

G7g: Satisfaction: PI control over indirect cost allocation	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	1.7	1.5
3: Satisfied (%)	15.6	12.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	36.5	25.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	47.9	62.5
Total (N)	96	32

Section H: Performance Review, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure

H1: Faculty performance review standards are clearly stated	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	30.2	25.6
3: Agree (%)	42.5	46.2
2: Disagree (%)	19.8	17.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.5	10.3
Total (N)	106	39

H2: Faculty performance review procedures are clearly stated	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	33.3	31.6
3: Agree (%)	51.9	47.4
2: Disagree (%)	9.3	18.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.6	2.6
Total (N)	108	38

H3: SME is consistent with departmental vision	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	27.0	29.4
3: Agree (%)	60.7	52.9
2: Disagree (%)	7.9	11.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.5	5.9
Total (N)	89	34

H4: SME is consistent with departmental promotion standards	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	29.3	35.5
3: Agree (%)	61.0	48.4
2: Disagree (%)	4.9	12.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.9	3.2
Total (N)	82	31

H5a: Performance Review feedback appropriately based on SME	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	24.0	27.3
3: Agree (%)	53.3	48.5
2: Disagree (%)	14.7	18.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.0	6.1
Total (N)	75	33

H5b: Performance Review feedback helpful for professional Development	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	17.6	28.6
3: Agree (%)	50.6	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	27.1	22.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.7	8.6
Total (N)	85	35

H5c: Performance Review feedback corresponds with my perceptions of own performance	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	17.9	20.6
3: Agree (%)	58.3	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	19.0	20.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.8	8.8
Total (N)	84	34

H5d: Performance Review feedback helps understand relation to other faculty	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	15.1	15.2
3: Agree (%)	38.4	42.4
2: Disagree (%)	34.9	30.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	11.6	12.1
Total (N)	86	33

H5e: Feedback given appropriate weight in merit raises	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	13.6	8.8
3: Agree (%)	56.8	55.9
2: Disagree (%)	17.3	14.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	12.3	20.6
Total (N)	81	34

H6: Understanding of current Academic Tenure Policy	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8
4: Very well (%)	29.9	13.2
3: Fairly well (%)	39.3	57.9
2: Not very well (%)	23.4	21.1
1: Not at all (%)	7.5	7.9
Total (N)	107	38

H7_1: Participated in RPT process as candidate	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	40.4	42.5
Yes (%)	59.6	57.5
Total (N)	109	40

H7_2: Participated in RPT process as voter	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	32.1	57.5
Yes (%)	67.9	42.5
Total (N)	109	40

H7_3: Participated in RPT process as review committee member	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	55.0	77.5
Yes (%)	45.0	22.5
Total (N)	109	40

H7_4: Have never participated in RPT process	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	84.4	77.5
Yes (%)	15.6	22.5
Total (N)	109	40

H8: Understand dept RPT standards	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	3.0
4: Very well (%)	48.1	26.3
3: Fairly well (%)	35.2	50.0
2: Not very well (%)	11.1	18.4
1: Not at all (%)	5.6	5.3
Total (N)	108	38

H9: Understand dept RPT procedures	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.4	3.2
4: Very well (%)	51.9	27.0
3: Fairly well (%)	37.0	64.9
2: Not very well (%)	7.4	8.1
1: Not at all (%)	3.7	.
Total (N)	108	37

H10: Departmental RPT standards applied consistently/fairly	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	33.3	21.9
3: Agree (%)	51.6	53.1
2: Disagree (%)	8.6	15.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.5	9.4
Total (N)	93	32

H11: Departmental RPT procedures applied consistently/fairly	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	35.5	30.3
3: Agree (%)	53.8	51.5
2: Disagree (%)	6.5	12.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.3	6.1
Total (N)	93	33

H12a: Sufficient resources for teaching/mentoring students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	9.8	8.3
3: Agree (%)	57.8	55.6
2: Disagree (%)	29.4	36.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.9	.
Total (N)	102	36

H12b: Sufficient resources for discovery of knowledge	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.1	6.9
3: Agree (%)	53.9	48.3
2: Disagree (%)	31.5	41.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.5	3.4
Total (N)	89	29

H12c: Sufficient resources for creative artistry and literature	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.6
3: Agree (%)	66.7	57.1
2: Disagree (%)	16.7	42.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	16.7	.
Total (N)	18	7

H12d: Sufficient resources for tech/managerial innovation	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	4.5	7.7
3: Agree (%)	48.5	38.5
2: Disagree (%)	27.3	46.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	19.7	7.7
Total (N)	66	26

H12e: Sufficient resources for extension/engagement	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	1.5	.
3: Agree (%)	58.5	60.9
2: Disagree (%)	29.2	34.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	10.8	4.3
Total (N)	65	23

H12f: Sufficient resources for professional service	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	3.4	3.8
3: Agree (%)	47.7	46.2
2: Disagree (%)	39.8	34.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.1	15.4
Total (N)	88	26

H13a: Department rewards teaching/mentoring of students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	13.1	2.9
3: Agree (%)	49.5	58.8
2: Disagree (%)	29.3	26.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.1	11.8
Total (N)	99	34

H13b: Department rewards discovery of knowledge	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	33.3	3.3
3: Agree (%)	51.6	56.7
2: Disagree (%)	10.8	26.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.3	13.3
Total (N)	93	30

H13c: Department rewards creative artistry and literature	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	14.3	12.5
3: Agree (%)	57.1	37.5
2: Disagree (%)	14.3	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	14.3	.
Total (N)	14	8

H13d: Department rewards tech/managerial innovation	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.6	.
3: Agree (%)	63.6	46.2
2: Disagree (%)	19.7	46.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.1	7.7
Total (N)	66	26

H13e: Department rewards extension/engagement	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	11.8	4.2
3: Agree (%)	54.4	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	22.1	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	11.8	12.5
Total (N)	68	24

H13f: Department rewards professional service	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	11.4	.
3: Agree (%)	50.0	71.4
2: Disagree (%)	33.0	17.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.7	10.7
Total (N)	88	28

Section I: Post-Tenure Review

I1_1: No experience with PTR	White	Faculty of Color
Has experience (%)	63.7	42.1
No experience (%)	36.3	57.9
Total (N)	102	38

I1_2: Have had PTR Comprehensive Review	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	52.0	73.7
Yes (%)	48.0	26.3
Total (N)	102	38

I1_3: Have served on PTR committee	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	60.8	84.2
Yes (%)	39.2	15.8
Total (N)	102	38

I1_4: Have been dept/college administrator in PTR process	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	90.2	97.4
Yes (%)	9.8	2.6
Total (N)	102	38

I1_5: Had other PTR experience	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	97.1	92.1
Yes (%)	2.9	7.9
Total (N)	102	38

I2a: Easy to find PTR information on NCSU website	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	17.1	14.8
3: Agree (%)	67.1	63.0
2: Disagree (%)	14.5	22.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.3	.
Total (N)	76	27

I2b: PTR process known/understood in department	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	15.0	9.1
3: Agree (%)	50.0	77.3
2: Disagree (%)	32.5	13.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.5	.
Total (N)	80	22

I2c: Departmental PTR procedures are clear	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	14.6	8.7
3: Agree (%)	56.1	73.9
2: Disagree (%)	26.8	17.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.4	.
Total (N)	82	23

I2d: Departmental PTR standards are clear	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	17.7	8.7
3: Agree (%)	44.3	73.9
2: Disagree (%)	34.2	17.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.8	.
Total (N)	79	23

I2e: Departmental PTR procedures are followed equitably	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	23.4	15.0
3: Agree (%)	64.1	70.0
2: Disagree (%)	9.4	15.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.1	.
Total (N)	64	20

I2f: Departmental PTR standards are applied fairly	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.8	14.3
3: Agree (%)	58.1	71.4
2: Disagree (%)	11.3	9.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.8	4.8
Total (N)	62	21

I2g: Dept PTR committee members are well prepared and trained	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	15.8	17.6
3: Agree (%)	57.9	52.9
2: Disagree (%)	19.3	23.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.0	5.9
Total (N)	57	17

I3: Overall satisfaction with PTR process	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	12.1	19.0
3: Satisfied (%)	56.1	61.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	18.2	19.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	13.6	.
Total (N)	66	21

Section J: Pay and Compensation

J1a: My salary is competitive within my department	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.0	15.4
3: Agree (%)	54.4	46.2
2: Disagree (%)	30.0	19.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.6	19.2
Total (N)	90	26

J1b: My salary is competitive within my college	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	1.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	8.6	.
3: Agree (%)	42.9	25.0
2: Disagree (%)	38.6	41.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	10.0	33.3
Total (N)	70	12

J1c: My salary is competitive within NC State	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	13.1	.
3: Agree (%)	65.6	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	19.7	30.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.6	10.0
Total (N)	61	10

J1d: My salary is competitive within UNC system	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	9.1	.
3: Agree (%)	41.8	23.1
2: Disagree (%)	32.7	53.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	16.4	23.1
Total (N)	55	13

J1e: My salary is competitive within discipline at comparable institutions	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	1.8	1.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	2.5	3.2
3: Agree (%)	10.0	22.6
2: Disagree (%)	48.8	29.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	38.8	45.2
Total (N)	80	31

J2: Understand how faculty salaries determined	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	2.1
4: Very well (%)	12.1	2.6
3: Fairly well (%)	39.3	33.3
2: Not very well (%)	24.3	35.9
1: Not at all (%)	24.3	28.2
Total (N)	107	39

J3: My department links salary increase to meritorious performance	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	17.2	12.1
3: Agree (%)	58.1	54.5
2: Disagree (%)	18.3	21.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.5	12.1
Total (N)	93	33

J4: I have access to benefits information	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	29.9	28.2
3: Agree (%)	66.4	64.1
2: Disagree (%)	3.7	7.7
Total (N)	107	39

J5: Healthcare benefits are competitive with other institutions	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	1.9	1.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	3.2	3.0
3: Agree (%)	21.5	15.2
2: Disagree (%)	34.4	21.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	40.9	60.6
Total (N)	93	33

J6: Retirement programs are competitive with other institutions	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.3	1.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	2.4	3.2
3: Agree (%)	48.8	25.8
2: Disagree (%)	25.0	32.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	23.8	38.7
Total (N)	84	31

J7: Voluntary benefits programs are competitive with other institutions	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	2.9	4.5
3: Agree (%)	69.6	40.9
2: Disagree (%)	20.3	36.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.2	18.2
Total (N)	69	22

J8: I am satisfied with my compensation at NC State	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.3	2.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	2.8	.
3: Agree (%)	40.6	38.5
2: Disagree (%)	43.4	35.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	13.2	25.6
Total (N)	106	39

J9: Departmental environment enables work/personal life balance	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	16.0	18.4
3: Agree (%)	62.3	57.9
2: Disagree (%)	17.9	18.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.8	5.3
Total (N)	106	38

J10: NCSU environment enables work/personal life balance	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.5	13.2
3: Agree (%)	66.7	68.4
2: Disagree (%)	20.0	15.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.9	2.6
Total (N)	105	38

J11a: Importance of flexible work hours	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.7	3.6
4: Very important (%)	73.8	71.8
3: Somewhat important (%)	21.5	17.9
2: Not very important (%)	2.8	7.7
1: Not at all important (%)	1.9	2.6
Total (N)	107	39

J11b: Importance of maternity/paternity leave	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.6	3.5
4: Very important (%)	65.4	59.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	29.9	30.8
2: Not very important (%)	0.9	7.7
1: Not at all important (%)	3.7	2.6
Total (N)	107	39

J11c: Importance of family leave time	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.6	3.5
4: Very important (%)	63.2	53.8
3: Somewhat important (%)	34.0	41.0
2: Not very important (%)	0.9	5.1
1: Not at all important (%)	1.9	.
Total (N)	106	39

J11d: Importance of altering tenure clock for family concerns	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	3.3
4: Very important (%)	61.7	41.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	30.8	51.3
2: Not very important (%)	4.7	5.1
1: Not at all important (%)	2.8	2.6
Total (N)	107	39

J11e: Importance of childcare facility on or near campus	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	3.2
4: Very important (%)	43.0	41.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	39.3	43.6
2: Not very important (%)	13.1	10.3
1: Not at all important (%)	4.7	5.1
Total (N)	107	39

J11f: Importance of tuition remission for dependents	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	3.6
4: Very important (%)	64.5	73.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	25.2	18.9
2: Not very important (%)	8.4	8.1
1: Not at all important (%)	1.9	.
Total (N)	107	37

Section K: Campus Infrastructure/Physical Environment

K1: I have sufficient clerical/admin support in my dept	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	12.4	12.8
3: Agree (%)	42.9	30.8
2: Disagree (%)	28.6	38.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	16.2	17.9
Total (N)	105	39

K2: I have sufficient tech assistance	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	9.4	10.3
3: Agree (%)	50.0	43.6
2: Disagree (%)	26.4	35.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	14.2	10.3
Total (N)	106	39

K3: There is sufficient support staff in my college	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	9.6	5.3
3: Agree (%)	56.7	52.6
2: Disagree (%)	25.0	34.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.7	7.9
Total (N)	104	38

K4a: Satisfaction with office space	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	35.8	20.5
3: Satisfied (%)	50.9	51.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	10.4	25.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.8	2.6
Total (N)	106	39

K4b: Satisfaction with lab space	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	21.3	7.7
3: Satisfied (%)	56.2	46.2
2: Dissatisfied (%)	15.7	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.7	12.8
Total (N)	89	39

K4c: Satisfaction with classrooms in which you teach	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	35.6	12.8
3: Satisfied (%)	47.1	64.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	11.5	23.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.8	.
Total (N)	104	39

K4d: Satisfaction with labs in which you teach	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	33.3	9.1
3: Satisfied (%)	40.9	59.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	22.7	18.2
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	3.0	13.6
Total (N)	66	22

K4e: Satisfaction with maintenance of building in which you work	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	16.0	10.5
3: Satisfied (%)	46.2	52.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	26.4	18.4
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	11.3	18.4
Total (N)	106	38

K4f: Satisfaction with infrastructure of bldgs in which you work	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	21.7	10.5
3: Satisfied (%)	43.4	52.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	21.7	18.4
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	13.2	18.4
Total (N)	106	38

K4g: Satisfaction with availability of up-to-date equipment	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	15.1	5.1
3: Satisfied (%)	51.9	48.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	25.5	35.9
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	7.5	10.3
Total (N)	106	39

K4h: Satisfaction with availability of office supplies	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	19.0	7.7
3: Satisfied (%)	62.9	76.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	16.2	15.4
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	1.9	.
Total (N)	105	39

K4i: Satisfaction with availability of informal meeting space	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	17.0	10.3
3: Satisfied (%)	54.7	64.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	25.5	15.4
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.8	10.3
Total (N)	106	39

K4j: Satisfaction with dining options on campus	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	1.9	2.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	2.2	.
3: Satisfied (%)	24.7	30.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	37.1	39.4
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	36.0	30.3
Total (N)	89	33

K4k: Satisfaction with availability of parking	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	4.8	.
3: Satisfied (%)	57.1	51.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	28.6	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	9.5	15.4
Total (N)	105	39

K4l: Satisfaction with cost of parking	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.2	2.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	1.9	.
3: Satisfied (%)	39.0	41.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	39.0	41.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	20.0	17.9
Total (N)	105	39

K4m: Satisfaction with Wolfline	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	10.4	11.1
3: Satisfied (%)	66.7	55.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	14.6	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	8.3	.
Total (N)	48	9

K4n: Satisfaction with commute between Centennial and main	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	2.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	3.6	.
3: Satisfied (%)	45.2	38.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	34.5	46.2
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	16.7	15.4
Total (N)	84	26

K4o: Satisfaction with campus safety	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	5.4	3.4
3: Satisfied (%)	82.6	79.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	10.9	17.2
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	1.1	.
Total (N)	92	29

K4p: Satisfaction with campus aesthetics	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	3.8	2.9
3: Satisfied (%)	54.3	62.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	30.5	22.9
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	11.4	11.4
Total (N)	105	35

K4q: Satisfaction with upkeep of campus grounds	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	5.7	5.6
3: Satisfied (%)	77.1	75.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	14.3	11.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.9	8.3
Total (N)	105	36

K4r: Satisfaction with amount of green space	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	4.8	5.3
3: Satisfied (%)	58.7	63.2
2: Dissatisfied (%)	26.0	23.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	10.6	7.9
Total (N)	104	38

K5a: Satisfaction with energy conservation	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	7.5	12.9
3: Satisfied (%)	63.8	61.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	22.5	25.8
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.3	.
Total (N)	80	31

K5b: Satisfaction with water conservation	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	7.7	13.3
3: Satisfied (%)	69.2	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	17.9	20.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.1	.
Total (N)	78	30

K5c: Satisfaction with recycling efforts	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	12.0	12.5
3: Satisfied (%)	72.8	68.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	12.0	18.8
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	3.3	.
Total (N)	92	32

K5d: Satisfaction with alternative transportation	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	3.7	7.1
3: Satisfied (%)	64.2	53.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	32.1	25.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	14.3
Total (N)	81	28

K5e: Satisfaction with green building practices	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	2.0	5.6
3: Satisfied (%)	76.0	44.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	18.0	27.8
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	4.0	22.2
Total (N)	50	18

K5f: Satisfaction with use of recycled-content resources	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	2.0	5.3
3: Satisfied (%)	82.0	63.2
2: Dissatisfied (%)	16.0	26.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	5.3
Total (N)	50	19

K6: Interest in hotel/conference center on Centennial Campus	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.3
4: A lot (%)	43.4	51.3
3: Some (%)	26.4	25.6
2: A little (%)	14.2	20.5
1: None at all (%)	16.0	2.6
Total (N)	106	39

K7: Likelihood of using conference center on Centennial Campus	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.5
4: Very likely (%)	44.8	53.8
3: Somewhat likely (%)	34.3	38.5
2: Not very likely (%)	10.5	7.7
1: Not at all likely (%)	10.5	.
Total (N)	105	39

Section L: Recreation/Wellness

L1: Satisfaction with recreation activities on campus	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	9.7	2.6
3: Satisfied (%)	72.8	53.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	15.5	43.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	1.9	.
Total (N)	103	39

L2: Satisfaction with cultural activities on campus	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	2.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	8.6	.
3: Satisfied (%)	73.3	48.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	16.2	46.2
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	1.9	5.1
Total (N)	105	39

L3a: Satisfaction with Carmichael Gymnasium	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	18.1	11.5
3: Satisfied (%)	68.7	57.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	10.8	23.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.4	7.7
Total (N)	83	26

L3b: Satisfaction with recreation space around campus	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	12.3	4.2
3: Satisfied (%)	69.9	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	15.1	45.8
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.7	.
Total (N)	73	24

L3c: Satisfaction with organized Campus Recreation activities	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	2.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	10.4	.
3: Satisfied (%)	77.1	42.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	10.4	57.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.1	.
Total (N)	48	14

L3d: Satisfaction with ARTS NC State programs	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	2.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	8.5	.
3: Satisfied (%)	81.7	47.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	8.5	47.4
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	1.4	5.3
Total (N)	71	19

L3e: Satisfaction with Wolfpack athletic events	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	11.3	11.8
3: Satisfied (%)	80.3	76.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	7.0	11.8
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	1.4	.
Total (N)	71	17

L4a: How often use Carmichael Gymnasium	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.2
Once a week or more (%)	23.6	23.7
A few times a month (%)	8.5	5.3
A few times a semester (%)	14.2	15.8
Once a semester (%)	4.7	10.5
Once a year (%)	10.4	7.9
Never (%)	38.7	36.8
Total (N)	106	38

L4b: How often use recreational space around campus	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.4
Once a week or more (%)	9.4	7.7
A few times a month (%)	11.3	7.7
A few times a semester (%)	14.2	10.3
Once a semester (%)	7.5	12.8
Once a year (%)	15.1	15.4
Never (%)	42.5	46.2
Total (N)	106	39

L4c: How often participate in organized Campus Recreation activities	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	1.7	1.5
Once a week or more (%)	1.0	.
A few times a month (%)	3.9	5.1
A few times a semester (%)	7.8	5.1
Once a semester (%)	7.8	5.1
Once a year (%)	7.8	5.1
Never (%)	71.8	79.5
Total (N)	103	39

L4d: How often attend ARTS NC State programs	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.3	1.9
A few times a month (%)	1.0	2.6
A few times a semester (%)	21.9	10.3
Once a semester (%)	20.0	15.4
Once a year (%)	23.8	15.4
Never (%)	33.3	56.4
Total (N)	105	39

L4e: How often attend Wolfpack athletic events	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	1.9
A few times a month (%)	5.8	.
A few times a semester (%)	24.0	18.4
Once a semester (%)	17.3	10.5
Once a year (%)	17.3	10.5
Never (%)	35.6	60.5
Total (N)	104	38

L5: Interest in designated faculty-only dining facility	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.8
4: A great deal (%)	31.1	35.9
3: Some (%)	25.5	28.2
2: A little (%)	17.0	20.5
1: None at all (%)	26.4	15.4
Total (N)	106	39

L6: Likelihood of using gym on Centennial campus	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.3
4: Very likely (%)	47.2	48.7
3: Somewhat likely (%)	23.6	30.8
2: Not very likely (%)	16.0	20.5
1: Not at all likely (%)	13.2	.
Total (N)	106	39

Section M: Work Activities

M1: Total hours per week spent performing job-related work (collapsed)	White	Faculty of Color
Mean # Hrs Work	58.3	60.7
more than 60 hrs (%)	25.7	35.9
51 to 60 hrs (%)	44.8	35.9
41 to 50 hrs (%)	25.7	23.1
40 hrs or less (%)	3.8	5.1
Total (N)	105	39

M2A: Proportion of total hours spent on teaching/mentoring	White	Faculty of Color
Mean % of Time on Activity	37.8	35.8
more than 50% of time (%)	13.0	10.3
26% to 50% of time (%)	63.0	61.5
11% to 25% of time (%)	20.4	28.2
6% to 10% of time (%)	2.8	.
0% of time (%)	0.9	.
Total (N)	108	39

M2a_1r: Includes teaching (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	12.1	10.3
Yes (%)	87.9	89.7
Total (N)	107	39

M2a_2r: Includes professional development to improve teaching (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	59.8	56.4
Yes (%)	40.2	43.6
Total (N)	107	39

M2a_3r: Includes research projects with students (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	25.2	23.1
Yes (%)	74.8	76.9
Total (N)	107	39

M2a_4r: Includes supervising internships/field experiences (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	74.8	87.2
Yes (%)	25.2	12.8
Total (N)	107	39

M2a_5r: Includes student thesis/dissertation committee work (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	25.2	25.6
Yes (%)	74.8	74.4
Total (N)	107	39

M2B: Proportion of total hours spent advising students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean % of Time on Activity	8.6	9.7
more than 50% of time (%)	0.9	.
26% to 50% of time (%)	5.6	5.1
11% to 25% of time (%)	8.3	17.9
6% to 10% of time (%)	17.6	23.1
1% to 5% of time (%)	61.1	41.0
0% of time (%)	6.5	12.8
Total (N)	108	39

M2b_1r: Includes formal advising (among those reporting time spent on advising)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	33.7	29.4
Yes (%)	66.3	70.6
Total (N)	101	34

M2b_2r: Includes informal advising (among those reporting time spent on advising)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	28.7	35.3
Yes (%)	71.3	64.7
Total (N)	101	34

M2C: Proportion of total hours spent on research/scholarly activities	White	Faculty of Color
Mean % of Time on Activity	30.6	36.2
more than 50% of time (%)	4.6	5.1
26% to 50% of time (%)	55.6	71.8
11% to 25% of time (%)	21.3	12.8
6% to 10% of time (%)	1.9	2.6
1% to 5% of time (%)	4.6	5.1
0% of time (%)	12.0	2.6
Total (N)	108	39

M2D: Proportion of total hours spent on creative artistry/literature	White	Faculty of Color
Mean % of Time on Activity	0.6	2.4
11% to 25% of time (%)	0.9	5.1
6% to 10% of time (%)	2.8	7.7
1% to 5% of time (%)	4.6	10.3
0% of time (%)	91.7	76.9
Total (N)	108	39

M2E: Proportion of total hours spent on extension/engagement/econ dev	White	Faculty of Color
Mean % of Time on Activity	2.9	2.6
26% to 50% of time (%)	2.8	2.6
11% to 25% of time (%)	0.9	.
6% to 10% of time (%)	7.4	5.1
1% to 5% of time (%)	22.2	20.5
0% of time (%)	66.7	71.8
Total (N)	108	39

M2e_1r: Includes service learning teaching/mentoring (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	72.2	54.5
Yes (%)	27.8	45.5
Total (N)	36	11

M2e_2r: Includes extension education/non-credit programs (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	63.9	54.5
Yes (%)	36.1	45.5
Total (N)	36	11

M2e_3r: Includes economic development training/tech assistance (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	80.6	72.7
Yes (%)	19.4	27.3
Total (N)	36	11

M2e_4r: Includes partnering with private sector - job/investment creation (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	55.6	72.7
Yes (%)	44.4	27.3
Total (N)	36	11

M2e_5r: Public service grants/contracts (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	86.1	72.7
Yes (%)	13.9	27.3
Total (N)	36	11

M2F: Proportion of total hours spent on service work	White	Faculty of Color
Mean % of Time on Activity	11.3	10.5
26% to 50% of time (%)	3.7	5.1
11% to 25% of time (%)	29.6	23.1
6% to 10% of time (%)	34.3	30.8
1% to 5% of time (%)	27.8	38.5
0% of time (%)	4.6	2.6
Total (N)	108	39

M2f_1r: Includes advising student groups (among those reporting time spent on service work)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	64.1	84.2
Yes (%)	35.9	15.8
Total (N)	103	38

M2f_2r: Includes dept/college/university committees (among those reporting time spent on service work)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	14.6	23.7
Yes (%)	85.4	76.3
Total (N)	103	38

M2f_3r: Includes professional service (among those reporting time spent on service work)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	36.9	28.9
Yes (%)	63.1	71.1
Total (N)	103	38

M2f_4r: Includes academic program assessment activities (among those reporting time spent on service work)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	66.0	86.8
Yes (%)	34.0	13.2
Total (N)	103	38

M2f_5r: Includes other university service (among those reporting time spent on service work)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	73.8	78.9
Yes (%)	26.2	21.1
Total (N)	103	38

M2G: Proportion of total hours spent on tech/managerial innovation	White	Faculty of Color
Mean % of Time on Activity	1.0	0.8
6% to 10% of time (%)	1.9	.
1% to 5% of time (%)	24.1	20.5
0% of time (%)	74.1	79.5
Total (N)	108	39

M2H: Proportion of total hours spent on dept/college admin duties	White	Faculty of Color
Mean % of Time on Activity	6.3	1.9
more than 50% of time (%)	1.9	.
26% to 50% of time (%)	5.6	.
11% to 25% of time (%)	6.5	2.6
6% to 10% of time (%)	7.4	7.7
1% to 5% of time (%)	17.6	15.4
0% of time (%)	61.1	74.4
Total (N)	108	39

M3_1: Worked summer at NCSU without overload pay	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	30.6	33.3
Yes (%)	69.4	66.7
Total (N)	108	39

M3_2: Taught at NCSU on overload basis	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	75.0	82.1
Yes (%)	25.0	17.9
Total (N)	108	39

M3_3: Taught NCSU distance education class	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	55.6	61.5
Yes (%)	44.4	38.5
Total (N)	108	39

M3_4: Taught for another academic institution	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	96.3	87.2
Yes (%)	3.7	12.8
Total (N)	108	39

M3_5: Did outside consulting/freelance for pay	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	51.9	56.4
Yes (%)	48.1	43.6
Total (N)	108	39

M3_6: Did outside consulting/freelance without pay	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	63.9	76.9
Yes (%)	36.1	23.1
Total (N)	108	39

M3_7: Had other secondary employment	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	99.1	97.4
Yes (%)	0.9	2.6
Total (N)	108	39

M4: Frequency of volunteer work past 2 years	White	Faculty of Color
Never (%)	17.9	13.2
A few times (%)	53.8	52.6
About once per month (%)	8.5	18.4
Two or three times per month (%)	9.4	5.3
At least once per week (%)	10.4	10.5
Total (N)	106	38

M5: Frequency of public policy work past 5 years	White	Faculty of Color
Never (%)	52.4	73.0
Once or twice (%)	22.9	16.2
Three to five times (%)	14.3	2.7
Six to ten times (%)	3.8	5.4
More than 10 times (%)	6.7	2.7
Total (N)	105	37

M6: Management of work-related demands of past 2 years	White	Faculty of Color
1: Managing everything just fine (%)	4.7	.
2 (%)	27.4	18.4
3 (%)	36.8	47.4
4 (%)	29.2	23.7
5: Completely overwhelmed (%)	1.9	10.5
Total (N)	106	38

M7: Change how you spend your work time	White	Faculty of Color
I would change how I spent time (%)	61.9	65.7
I would not change a thing (%)	38.1	34.3
Total (N)	97	35

Section N: Conclusions/Overall Satisfaction

N1: Satisfaction with your "fit" in department	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	31.8	17.9
3: Satisfied (%)	48.6	51.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	16.8	23.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.8	7.7
Total (N)	107	39

N2: I generally feel valued in my department	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	32.7	20.5
3: Agree (%)	48.6	53.8
2: Disagree (%)	15.9	20.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.8	5.1
Total (N)	107	39

N3a: I am treated with respect by my students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	52.3	41.0
3: Agree (%)	43.0	56.4
2: Disagree (%)	3.7	2.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	0.9	.
Total (N)	107	39

N3b: I am treated with respect by dept support staff	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	58.9	35.9
3: Agree (%)	36.4	59.0
2: Disagree (%)	2.8	5.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.9	.
Total (N)	107	39

N3c: I am treated with respect faculty in my dept	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	43.0	28.2
3: Agree (%)	48.6	61.5
2: Disagree (%)	6.5	7.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.9	2.6
Total (N)	107	39

N3d: I am treated with respect by NCSU administrators	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.5	21.1
3: Agree (%)	52.8	63.2
2: Disagree (%)	10.4	13.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	11.3	2.6
Total (N)	106	38

N4: I would recommend my department as a good place to work	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	30.8	17.9
3: Agree (%)	56.1	64.1
2: Disagree (%)	10.3	10.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.8	7.7
Total (N)	107	39

N5a: Amount of stress due to reappointment, promotion or Tenure	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.7
4: A great deal (%)	22.1	23.5
3: Some (%)	32.6	38.2
2: A little (%)	16.8	20.6
1: None at all (%)	28.4	17.6
Total (N)	95	34

N5b: Amount of stress from research/publication demands	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.1
4: A great deal (%)	35.9	41.0
3: Some (%)	35.9	35.9
2: A little (%)	16.5	17.9
1: None at all (%)	11.7	5.1
Total (N)	103	39

N5c: Amount of stress from professional Development	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.6
4: A great deal (%)	14.4	13.5
3: Some (%)	38.5	48.6
2: A little (%)	26.9	18.9
1: None at all (%)	20.2	18.9
Total (N)	104	37

N5d: Amount of stress from institutional procedures	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	2.6
4: A great deal (%)	31.1	18.8
3: Some (%)	35.0	40.6
2: A little (%)	24.3	21.9
1: None at all (%)	9.7	18.8
Total (N)	103	32

N5e: Amount of stress from committee work	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.4
4: A great deal (%)	16.0	7.7
3: Some (%)	37.7	41.0
2: A little (%)	31.1	35.9
1: None at all (%)	15.1	15.4
Total (N)	106	39

N5f: Amount of stress from relationships with students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.0	2.1
4: A great deal (%)	5.6	10.3
3: Some (%)	19.6	17.9
2: A little (%)	40.2	41.0
1: None at all (%)	34.6	30.8
Total (N)	107	39

N5g: Amount of stress from relationships with faculty in dept	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.2	2.3
4: A great deal (%)	9.4	7.9
3: Some (%)	24.5	23.7
2: A little (%)	40.6	55.3
1: None at all (%)	25.5	13.2
Total (N)	106	38

N5h: Amount of stress from relationships w/dept admin	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.3	2.3
4: A great deal (%)	12.3	17.9
3: Some (%)	29.2	25.6
2: A little (%)	31.1	20.5
1: None at all (%)	27.4	35.9
Total (N)	106	39

N5i: Amount of stress from relationships w/college admin	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.1	1.6
4: A great deal (%)	9.0	.
3: Some (%)	23.0	9.4
2: A little (%)	32.0	40.6
1: None at all (%)	36.0	50.0
Total (N)	100	32

N5j: Amount of stress from workload	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.1
4: A great deal (%)	32.7	36.8
3: Some (%)	39.3	42.1
2: A little (%)	22.4	10.5
1: None at all (%)	5.6	10.5
Total (N)	107	38

N5k: Amount of stress from work/personal life balance	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.1
4: A great deal (%)	34.6	31.6
3: Some (%)	41.1	55.3
2: A little (%)	16.8	7.9
1: None at all (%)	7.5	5.3
Total (N)	107	38

N5l: Amount of stress from working with under-prepared students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	3.0
4: A great deal (%)	18.1	26.3
3: Some (%)	42.9	52.6
2: A little (%)	27.6	18.4
1: None at all (%)	11.4	2.6
Total (N)	105	38

N5m: Amount of stress from self-assessment activities	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.3	2.3
4: A great deal (%)	9.5	7.7
3: Some (%)	28.6	28.2
2: A little (%)	41.9	46.2
1: None at all (%)	20.0	17.9
Total (N)	105	39

N5n: Amount of stress from program assessment requirements	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.3
4: A great deal (%)	17.5	2.9
3: Some (%)	30.1	34.3
2: A little (%)	36.9	48.6
1: None at all (%)	15.5	14.3
Total (N)	103	35

N6: Overall satisfaction with NCSU	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	11.2	10.5
3: Satisfied (%)	69.2	60.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	17.8	26.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	1.9	2.6
Total (N)	107	38

N7: More or less satisfied with NC State, compared to 5 yrs ago	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9
A lot more satisfied now (%)	6.5	8.1
Somewhat more satisfied now (%)	30.8	16.2
Neither more or less satisfied now (%)	21.5	40.5
Somewhat less satisfied now (%)	28.0	29.7
A lot less satisfied now (%)	13.1	5.4
Total (N)	107	37

N8: Ever considered leaving NC State for another university	White	Faculty of Color
No - never considered leaving (%)	20.8	20.5
Yes - not very seriously (%)	28.3	20.5
Yes - somewhat seriously (%)	27.4	35.9
Yes - very seriously (%)	23.6	23.1
Total (N)	106	39

N10: Ever considered leaving academe, since coming to NC State	White	Faculty of Color
No - never considered leaving (%)	44.9	56.4
Yes - not very seriously (%)	23.4	25.6
Yes - somewhat seriously (%)	16.8	10.3
Yes - very seriously (%)	15.0	7.7
Total (N)	107	39

Endnote:

1. "Faculty of Color" includes African American, Asian, Hispanic, and Native American respondents. Due to small cell sizes at this level of analysis,
this categorization of race/ethnicity was necessary to protect respondent confidentiality. (back)

For more information on the NC State University 2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey contact:
Dr. Nancy Whelchel, Associate Director for Survey Research
Office of Institutional Planning and Research
Box 7002
NCSU
Phone: (919) 515-4184
Email: ncsu_surveys@ncsu.edu

Posted: April, 2007