North Carolina State University
2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey:

Results for the College of Engineering
by Gender

To skip directly to a particular section, select the section below.

Section B: Image and Vision	Section I: Post-Tenure Review
Section C: Leadership	Section J: Pay and Compensation
Section D: Faculty-Administration Relationships	Section K: Campus Infrastructure/Physical Environment
Section E: Diversity/Multiculturalism	Section L: Recreation/Wellness
Section F: Working Relationships	Section M: Work Activities
Section G: Faculty Support & Professional Development	Section N: Conclusions/Overall Satisfaction
Section H: Performance Review, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure

To download a Microsoft Word version of this document, click here.

A2: Ever held an administrative position	Male	Female
..... No (%)	71.2	88.9
..... Yes (%)	28.8	11.1
Total (N)	146	18

Back to Top

Section B: Image and Vision

B1a: Department doing good job of recruiting faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	24.5	18.8
3: Agree (%)	54.5	68.8
2: Disagree (%)	17.5	12.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.5	.
Total (N)	143	16

B1b: Department creating culture where faculty can develop to full potential	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	15.7	18.8
3: Agree (%)	50.7	43.8
2: Disagree (%)	24.3	37.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.3	.
Total (N)	140	16

B1c: Department retaining most effective and productive faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	20.1	20.0
3: Agree (%)	51.8	53.3
2: Disagree (%)	23.7	26.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.3	.
Total (N)	139	15

B2a: Department national reputation for undergraduate educ	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.8	3.5
5: Very strong (%)	16.8	.
4: Strong (%)	49.0	52.9
3: Average (%)	29.4	47.1
2: Weak (%)	3.5	.
1: Very weak (%)	1.4	.
Total (N)	143	17

B2b: Department national reputation for graduate education	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.7	3.5
5: Very strong (%)	13.9	.
4: Strong (%)	46.5	58.8
3: Average (%)	34.0	35.3
2: Weak (%)	4.9	5.9
1: Very weak (%)	0.7	.
Total (N)	144	17

B2c: Department national reputation for research & scholarly activity	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.7	3.8
5: Very strong (%)	12.5	18.8
4: Strong (%)	50.0	56.3
3: Average (%)	32.6	12.5
2: Weak (%)	3.5	12.5
1: Very weak (%)	1.4	.
Total (N)	144	16

B2d: Department national reputation for creative artistry and literature	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.0
5: Very strong (%)	4.8	16.7
4: Strong (%)	23.8	16.7
3: Average (%)	52.4	16.7
2: Weak (%)	16.7	50.0
1: Very weak (%)	2.4	.
Total (N)	42	6

B2e: Department national reputation for tech & managerial innovation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.6
5: Very strong (%)	10.2	7.1
4: Strong (%)	35.6	50.0
3: Average (%)	37.3	35.7
2: Weak (%)	16.1	7.1
1: Very weak (%)	0.8	.
Total (N)	118	14

B2f: Department national reputation for extension & engagement	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.4
5: Very strong (%)	9.6	6.3
4: Strong (%)	39.2	31.3
3: Average (%)	40.0	56.3
2: Weak (%)	8.8	6.3
1: Very weak (%)	2.4	.
Total (N)	125	16

B2g: Department national reputation for contrib to econ Development	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	2.9
5: Very strong (%)	11.7	.
4: Strong (%)	30.8	25.0
3: Average (%)	41.7	50.0
2: Weak (%)	14.2	12.5
1: Very weak (%)	1.7	12.5
Total (N)	120	8

B3a: Grade undergraduate majors' ability to meet prog demands	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.9	3.8
A (%)	12.5	11.1
B (%)	66.0	61.1
C (%)	18.1	27.8
D (%)	3.5	.
Total (N)	144	18

B3b: Grade graduate student ability to meet prog demands	Male	Female
Mean Rating	4.2	4.1
A (%)	29.0	6.7
B (%)	60.0	93.3
C (%)	11.0	.
Total (N)	145	15

B3c: Grade demonstrated professional ability of faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	4.3	4.3
A (%)	35.9	43.8
B (%)	55.2	43.8
C (%)	8.3	12.5
D (%)	0.7	.
Total (N)	145	16

B3d: Grade professional achievement of faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	4.2	4.2
A (%)	30.8	35.3
B (%)	58.0	52.9
C (%)	9.8	11.8
D (%)	1.4	.
Total (N)	143	17

B3e: Grade own demonstrated professional ability	Male	Female
Mean Rating	4.4	4.4
A (%)	45.1	41.2
B (%)	49.3	52.9
C (%)	4.9	5.9
F (%)	0.7	.
Total (N)	144	17

B3f: Grade own professional achievement	Male	Female
Mean Rating	4.3	4.4
A (%)	39.6	52.9
B (%)	52.1	35.3
C (%)	6.9	11.8
D (%)	0.7	.
F (%)	0.7	.
Total (N)	144	17

B4: Department's vision for the future	Male	Female
Clear vision; actively working toward goals (%)	25.3	38.9
Vision with slow progress (%)	39.7	27.8
No clear vision (%)	28.1	22.2
Not familiar (%)	6.8	11.1
Total (N)	146	18

B5: Agreement with department vision for future	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	26.6	27.3
3: Agree (%)	71.3	63.6
2: Disagree (%)	2.1	9.1
Total (N)	94	11

B6: College's vision for the future	Male	Female
Clear vision; actively working toward goals (%)	10.3	.
Vision with slow progress (%)	40.0	33.3
No clear vision (%)	23.4	22.2
Not familiar (%)	26.2	44.4
Total (N)	145	18

B7a: Department change in next five years	Male	Female
Change for the better (%)	63.0	64.7
Change for the worse (%)	12.3	5.9
Not really change (%)	24.7	29.4
Total (N)	146	17

B7b: College change in next five years	Male	Female
Change for the better (%)	54.8	52.9
Change for the worse (%)	4.8	5.9
Not really change (%)	40.4	41.2
Total (N)	146	17

B7c: NC State change in next five years	Male	Female
Change for the better (%)	37.0	47.1
Change for the worse (%)	6.2	5.9
Not really change (%)	56.8	47.1
Total (N)	146	17

Back to Top

Section C: Leadership

C1a: Dept admin communication with faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	20.4	22.2
3: Good (%)	43.7	55.6
2: Fair (%)	25.4	11.1
1: Poor (%)	10.6	11.1
Total (N)	142	18

C1b: Dept admin seek faculty input for dept vision	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	3.1
4: Excellent (%)	25.5	47.1
3: Good (%)	37.6	17.6
2: Fair (%)	22.0	29.4
1: Poor (%)	14.9	5.9
Total (N)	141	17

C1c: Dept admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	18.0	38.9
3: Good (%)	41.4	33.3
2: Fair (%)	27.1	16.7
1: Poor (%)	13.5	11.1
Total (N)	133	18

C1d: Dept admin delegate dept responsibility to faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	19.0	23.5
3: Good (%)	48.9	58.8
2: Fair (%)	23.4	11.8
1: Poor (%)	8.8	5.9
Total (N)	137	17

C1e: Dept admin grant faculty autonomy	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.6
4: Excellent (%)	31.9	62.5
3: Good (%)	45.7	31.3
2: Fair (%)	15.9	6.3
1: Poor (%)	6.5	.
Total (N)	138	16

C1f: Dept admin set clear and explicit priorities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	12.7	17.6
3: Good (%)	39.6	52.9
2: Fair (%)	35.8	17.6
1: Poor (%)	11.9	11.8
Total (N)	134	17

C1g: Dept admin appreciate your contrib to mission	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	25.4	41.2
3: Good (%)	42.0	35.3
2: Fair (%)	22.5	5.9
1: Poor (%)	10.1	17.6
Total (N)	138	17

C1h: Dept admin conflict resolution	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.3
4: Excellent (%)	16.7	15.4
3: Good (%)	33.3	23.1
2: Fair (%)	35.8	38.5
1: Poor (%)	14.2	23.1
Total (N)	120	13

C1i: Dept admin provide necessary resources	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	10.4	23.5
3: Good (%)	47.2	41.2
2: Fair (%)	33.3	11.8
1: Poor (%)	9.0	23.5
Total (N)	144	17

C1j: Dept admin allocate resources fairly	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	12.0	18.8
3: Good (%)	57.1	43.8
2: Fair (%)	25.6	25.0
1: Poor (%)	5.3	12.5
Total (N)	133	16

C1k: Dept admin serve as advocate for dept to college	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.3
4: Excellent (%)	40.0	43.8
3: Good (%)	42.4	37.5
2: Fair (%)	14.4	18.8
1: Poor (%)	3.2	.
Total (N)	125	16

C1l: Dept admin support academic freedom	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.6
4: Excellent (%)	45.8	57.1
3: Good (%)	43.5	42.9
2: Fair (%)	6.9	.
1: Poor (%)	3.8	.
Total (N)	131	14

C1m: Dept admin make rational decisions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.1
4: Excellent (%)	25.0	37.5
3: Good (%)	49.3	43.8
2: Fair (%)	16.2	12.5
1: Poor (%)	9.6	6.3
Total (N)	136	16

C1n: Dept admin make equitable decisions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	21.4	37.5
3: Good (%)	49.6	31.3
2: Fair (%)	20.6	18.8
1: Poor (%)	8.4	12.5
Total (N)	131	16

C1o: Dept admin promote diversity within dept	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	21.8	26.7
3: Good (%)	48.4	40.0
2: Fair (%)	23.4	20.0
1: Poor (%)	6.5	13.3
Total (N)	124	15

C2a: College admin communication with faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.4
4: Excellent (%)	7.8	7.7
3: Good (%)	37.4	46.2
2: Fair (%)	40.0	23.1
1: Poor (%)	14.8	23.1
Total (N)	115	13

C2b: College admin seek faculty input for vision	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.1	1.9
4: Excellent (%)	5.1	.
3: Good (%)	27.6	27.3
2: Fair (%)	39.8	36.4
1: Poor (%)	27.6	36.4
Total (N)	98	11

C2c: College admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.1	2.0
4: Excellent (%)	4.7	.
3: Good (%)	25.9	37.5
2: Fair (%)	40.0	25.0
1: Poor (%)	29.4	37.5
Total (N)	85	8

C2d: College admin grant departmental autonomy	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	16.0	20.0
3: Good (%)	57.0	40.0
2: Fair (%)	21.0	20.0
1: Poor (%)	6.0	20.0
Total (N)	100	10

C2e: College admin set clear and explicit priorities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.2	2.4
4: Excellent (%)	6.5	.
3: Good (%)	29.3	66.7
2: Fair (%)	45.7	11.1
1: Poor (%)	18.5	22.2
Total (N)	92	9

C2f: College admin appreciate your contrib to mission	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	10.6	27.3
3: Good (%)	35.1	36.4
2: Fair (%)	37.2	27.3
1: Poor (%)	17.0	9.1
Total (N)	94	11

C2g: College admin conflict resolution	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.1
4: Excellent (%)	6.6	.
3: Good (%)	41.0	42.9
2: Fair (%)	34.4	28.6
1: Poor (%)	18.0	28.6
Total (N)	61	7

C2h: College admin provide necessary resources	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.2	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	5.0	28.6
3: Good (%)	36.4	35.7
2: Fair (%)	35.5	7.1
1: Poor (%)	23.1	28.6
Total (N)	121	14

C2i: College admin allocate resources fairly	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.2	2.5
4: Excellent (%)	.	20.0
3: Good (%)	37.9	40.0
2: Fair (%)	43.2	10.0
1: Poor (%)	18.9	30.0
Total (N)	95	10

C2j: College admin serve as advocate for college to univ	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	23.2	12.5
3: Good (%)	43.9	75.0
2: Fair (%)	22.0	.
1: Poor (%)	11.0	12.5
Total (N)	82	8

C2k: College admin support academic freedom	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.2
4: Excellent (%)	27.3	18.2
3: Good (%)	56.8	81.8
2: Fair (%)	11.4	.
1: Poor (%)	4.5	.
Total (N)	88	11

C2l: College admin make rational decisions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	14.1	.
3: Good (%)	54.3	77.8
2: Fair (%)	25.0	11.1
1: Poor (%)	6.5	11.1
Total (N)	92	9

C2m: College admin make equitable decisions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	9.2	.
3: Good (%)	48.3	71.4
2: Fair (%)	29.9	14.3
1: Poor (%)	12.6	14.3
Total (N)	87	7

C2n: College admin promote diversity within college	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	19.6	7.7
3: Good (%)	54.3	61.5
2: Fair (%)	16.3	23.1
1: Poor (%)	9.8	7.7
Total (N)	92	13

C3a: Univ admin communication with faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.2	2.1
4: Excellent (%)	4.1	6.7
3: Good (%)	33.6	33.3
2: Fair (%)	36.9	26.7
1: Poor (%)	25.4	33.3
Total (N)	122	15

C3b: Univ admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.9	1.8
4: Excellent (%)	2.3	.
3: Good (%)	20.7	36.4
2: Fair (%)	41.4	9.1
1: Poor (%)	35.6	54.5
Total (N)	87	11

C3c: Univ admin set clear and explicit priorities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.2	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	4.0	.
3: Good (%)	37.0	70.0
2: Fair (%)	34.0	20.0
1: Poor (%)	25.0	10.0
Total (N)	100	10

C3d: Univ admin serves as advocate for univ to constituents	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	16.7	30.0
3: Good (%)	42.2	50.0
2: Fair (%)	28.9	10.0
1: Poor (%)	12.2	10.0
Total (N)	90	10

C3e: Univ admin support academic freedom	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	23.1	18.2
3: Good (%)	49.0	63.6
2: Fair (%)	21.2	18.2
1: Poor (%)	6.7	.
Total (N)	104	11

C3f: Univ admin make rational decisions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	8.2	11.1
3: Good (%)	50.0	55.6
2: Fair (%)	30.6	22.2
1: Poor (%)	11.2	11.1
Total (N)	98	9

C3g: Univ admin make equitable decisions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.3
4: Excellent (%)	8.0	11.1
3: Good (%)	43.2	33.3
2: Fair (%)	30.7	33.3
1: Poor (%)	18.2	22.2
Total (N)	88	9

C3h: Univ admin promote diversity within university	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	21.2	15.4
3: Good (%)	53.8	61.5
2: Fair (%)	18.3	15.4
1: Poor (%)	6.7	7.7
Total (N)	104	13

Back to Top

Section D: Faculty-Administration Relationships

D1a: I am encouraged to give input on curricular issues	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	53.2	56.3
3: Agree (%)	35.5	31.3
2: Disagree (%)	9.2	12.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.1	.
Total (N)	141	16

D1b: I am encouraged to give input on prog assessment	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	41.3	56.3
3: Agree (%)	50.3	43.8
2: Disagree (%)	6.3	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.1	.
Total (N)	143	16

D1c: I am encouraged to give input on dept hiring	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	33.6	53.3
3: Agree (%)	47.6	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	14.7	6.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.2	6.7
Total (N)	143	15

D1d: I am encouraged to give input on college admin appointments	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	7.7	18.8
3: Agree (%)	39.9	31.3
2: Disagree (%)	37.8	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	14.7	25.0
Total (N)	143	16

D1e: I am encouraged to give input on university admin appointments	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.2	2.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	5.6	6.7
3: Agree (%)	35.0	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	37.1	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	22.4	26.7
Total (N)	143	15

D2: Familiarity with academic program assessment in dept	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.1
4: Very familiar (%)	50.7	35.3
3: Somewhat familiar (%)	43.0	47.1
2: Not very familiar (%)	3.5	11.8
1: Not at all familiar (%)	2.8	5.9
Total (N)	142	17

D3a: Understanding of resource allocation to university	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.0	1.8
4: Very well (%)	1.4	.
3: Fairly well (%)	22.5	18.8
2: Not very well (%)	47.9	43.8
1: Not at all (%)	28.2	37.5
Total (N)	142	16

D3b: Understanding of resource allocation to college	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.0	1.8
4: Very well (%)	1.4	.
3: Fairly well (%)	16.8	12.5
2: Not very well (%)	59.4	56.3
1: Not at all (%)	22.4	31.3
Total (N)	143	16

D3c: Understanding of resource allocation to department	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.2
4: Very well (%)	8.4	.
3: Fairly well (%)	27.3	33.3
2: Not very well (%)	53.1	53.3
1: Not at all (%)	11.2	13.3
Total (N)	143	15

D3d: Understanding of resource allocation within department	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9
4: Very well (%)	16.1	25.0
3: Fairly well (%)	48.3	37.5
2: Not very well (%)	30.8	37.5
1: Not at all (%)	4.9	.
Total (N)	143	16

D4: Faculty have sufficient input on dept resource allocation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	7.8	.
3: Agree (%)	46.8	43.8
2: Disagree (%)	37.6	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.8	6.3
Total (N)	141	16

D5: Dept faculty searches/appointments are collegial and inclusive	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	36.6	46.7
3: Agree (%)	50.0	46.7
2: Disagree (%)	10.6	6.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.8	.
Total (N)	142	15

D6a: Relations between faculty in dept and dept admin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.2
4: Excellent (%)	27.1	31.3
3: Good (%)	46.4	62.5
2: Fair (%)	17.1	.
1: Poor (%)	9.3	6.3
Total (N)	140	16

D6b: Relations between faculty in dept and college admin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	9.6	.
3: Good (%)	53.5	66.7
2: Fair (%)	31.6	33.3
1: Poor (%)	5.3	.
Total (N)	114	12

D6c: Relations between faculty in dept and univ admin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	4.3	.
3: Good (%)	45.7	71.4
2: Fair (%)	38.3	14.3
1: Poor (%)	11.7	14.3
Total (N)	94	7

D6d: Relations between all faculty and univ admin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.1
4: Excellent (%)	3.2	.
3: Good (%)	44.7	42.9
2: Fair (%)	38.3	28.6
1: Poor (%)	13.8	28.6
Total (N)	94	7

D7a: Faculty Senate effective commun between faculty and univ admin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	3.0	25.0
3: Agree (%)	49.5	37.5
2: Disagree (%)	30.3	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	17.2	12.5
Total (N)	99	8

D7b: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty in general	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	6.5	14.3
3: Agree (%)	48.4	42.9
2: Disagree (%)	29.0	28.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	16.1	14.3
Total (N)	93	7

D7c: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty like me	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.2	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	2.2	12.5
3: Agree (%)	38.7	25.0
2: Disagree (%)	33.3	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	25.8	12.5
Total (N)	93	8

D8: Effectiveness of university grievance procedures	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	3.0
4: Very effective (%)	7.3	.
3: Somewhat effective (%)	58.2	100.0
2: Not very effective (%)	25.5	.
1: Not at all effective (%)	9.1	.
Total (N)	55	4

D9: Importance of "ombuds" for informal conflict resolution	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.8
4: Very important (%)	51.7	75.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	40.6	25.0
2: Not very important (%)	5.6	.
1: Not at all important (%)	2.1	.
Total (N)	143	16

Back to Top

Section E: Diversity/Multiculturalism

E1: Importance of institutional emphasis on diversity/multiculturalism	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.6
4: Very important (%)	46.4	62.5
3: Somewhat important (%)	39.1	31.3
2: Not very important (%)	11.6	6.3
1: Not at all important (%)	2.9	.
Total (N)	138	16

E2: Importance of diversity to enhanced learning in own classroom	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	3.1
4: Very important (%)	22.8	18.8
3: Somewhat important (%)	45.6	68.8
2: Not very important (%)	24.3	12.5
1: Not at all important (%)	7.4	.
Total (N)	136	16

E3: NCSU prepares students to live and work in diverse society	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.7	7.7
3: Agree (%)	76.0	61.5
2: Disagree (%)	11.6	30.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.7	.
Total (N)	121	13

E4a: My dept recruits historically underrepresented students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	20.7	25.0
3: Agree (%)	52.9	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	22.3	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.1	.
Total (N)	121	16

E4b: My dept retains historically underrepresented students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	17.4	14.3
3: Agree (%)	61.7	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	19.1	35.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.7	.
Total (N)	115	14

E4c: My dept supports historically underrepresented students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	17.5	18.8
3: Agree (%)	64.0	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	17.5	31.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	0.9	.
Total (N)	114	16

E4d: My dept recruits historically underrepresented faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	20.3	20.0
3: Agree (%)	59.3	53.3
2: Disagree (%)	20.3	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	6.7
Total (N)	118	15

E4e: My dept retains historically underrepresented faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	22.9	7.7
3: Agree (%)	59.0	53.8
2: Disagree (%)	17.1	38.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.0	.
Total (N)	105	13

E4f: My dept supports historically underrepresented faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	23.0	7.7
3: Agree (%)	62.0	61.5
2: Disagree (%)	14.0	30.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.0	.
Total (N)	100	13

E5a: Dept environ accepting/respectful of age	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	43.8	33.3
3: Agree (%)	50.8	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	2.3	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.1	.
Total (N)	130	15

E5b: Dept environ accepting/respectful of disability status	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	47.1	62.5
3: Agree (%)	51.0	37.5
2: Disagree (%)	1.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.0	.
Total (N)	104	8

E5c: Dept environ accepting/respectful of gender	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	41.4	40.0
3: Agree (%)	55.5	53.3
2: Disagree (%)	3.1	6.7
Total (N)	128	15

E5d: Dept environ accepting/respectful of military status	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	43.2	50.0
3: Agree (%)	51.4	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	4.1	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.4	.
Total (N)	74	6

E5e: Dept environ accepting/respectful of nationality/ethnic origin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	44.8	35.7
3: Agree (%)	48.0	64.3
2: Disagree (%)	4.8	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.4	.
Total (N)	125	14

E5f: Dept environ accepting/respectful of race and color	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	42.5	35.7
3: Agree (%)	50.4	64.3
2: Disagree (%)	5.5	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.6	.
Total (N)	127	14

E5g: Dept environ accepting/respectful of religion	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	43.8	41.7
3: Agree (%)	51.8	41.7
2: Disagree (%)	3.6	16.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	0.9	.
Total (N)	112	12

E5h: Dept environ accepting/respectful of sexual orientation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	45.8	50.0
3: Agree (%)	51.4	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	2.8	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	16.7
Total (N)	72	6

E6a: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of age	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	52.3	53.3
3: Agree (%)	45.4	46.7
2: Disagree (%)	1.5	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	0.8	.
Total (N)	130	15

E6b: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of disability status	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	50.0	66.7
3: Agree (%)	48.3	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	0.9	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	0.9	.
Total (N)	116	9

E6c: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of gender	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	52.7	53.3
3: Agree (%)	45.7	46.7
2: Disagree (%)	0.8	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	0.8	.
Total (N)	129	15

E6d: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of military status	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	49.4	62.5
3: Agree (%)	48.3	37.5
2: Disagree (%)	1.1	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.1	.
Total (N)	89	8

E6e: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of national/ethnic origin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	52.0	46.2
3: Agree (%)	44.9	53.8
2: Disagree (%)	1.6	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.6	.
Total (N)	127	13

E6f: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of race and color	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	51.6	50.0
3: Agree (%)	45.3	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	1.6	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.6	.
Total (N)	128	14

E6g: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of religion	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	53.7	46.2
3: Agree (%)	43.9	46.2
2: Disagree (%)	1.6	7.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	0.8	.
Total (N)	123	13

E6h: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of sexual orientation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	44.6	50.0
3: Agree (%)	53.0	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	1.2	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.2	16.7
Total (N)	83	6

E7: Faculty diversity/multiculturalism enhancement of intellectual diversity in dept	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.6
4: A great deal (%)	15.0	7.7
3: Some (%)	41.4	69.2
2: A little (%)	27.8	.
1: Not at all (%)	15.8	23.1
Total (N)	133	13

E8: Inclusion of diversity-related topics, scholarship, etc in your courses	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.7	1.8
4: A great deal (%)	1.7	6.7
3: Some (%)	20.2	20.0
2: A little (%)	22.7	20.0
1: Not at all (%)	55.5	53.3
Total (N)	119	15

E9a: Interest in research, extension, art endeavors outside U.S.	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	2.5
4: A great deal (%)	51.4	20.0
3: Some (%)	33.3	46.7
2: A little (%)	8.0	.
1: None (%)	7.2	33.3
Total (N)	138	15

E9b: Interest in teaching study abroad	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	1.8
4: A great deal (%)	23.2	6.7
3: Some (%)	37.7	26.7
2: A little (%)	19.6	6.7
1: None (%)	19.6	60.0
Total (N)	138	15

E9c: Interest in participating in spring break service learning	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.9	1.7
4: A great deal (%)	3.6	6.7
3: Some (%)	28.3	13.3
2: A little (%)	25.4	20.0
1: None (%)	42.8	60.0
Total (N)	138	15

E9d: Interest in participating in international service projects	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	1.9
4: A great deal (%)	21.0	6.7
3: Some (%)	31.9	20.0
2: A little (%)	21.0	26.7
1: None (%)	26.1	46.7
Total (N)	138	15

E9e: Interest in teaching in international studies major	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.0	1.6
4: A great deal (%)	12.3	.
3: Some (%)	21.0	20.0
2: A little (%)	17.4	20.0
1: None (%)	49.3	60.0
Total (N)	138	15

E9f: Interest in advising international students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.0
4: A great deal (%)	44.2	42.9
3: Some (%)	37.7	28.6
2: A little (%)	8.0	14.3
1: None (%)	10.1	14.3
Total (N)	138	14

Back to Top

Section F: Working Relationships

F1: There is unity/cohesion among faculty in my department	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	23.0	26.7
3: Agree (%)	45.2	53.3
2: Disagree (%)	25.2	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.7	.
Total (N)	135	15

F2a: Good communication between my students and me	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	49.6	60.0
3: Agree (%)	49.6	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	0.7	.
Total (N)	135	15

F2b: Good communication between dept and our students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	22.3	40.0
3: Agree (%)	66.2	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	11.5	20.0
Total (N)	130	15

F2c: Good communication between faculty in my dept	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	20.9	33.3
3: Agree (%)	56.7	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	17.9	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.5	.
Total (N)	134	15

F2d: Good communication between my dept and other depts	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	8.0	12.5
3: Agree (%)	53.0	62.5
2: Disagree (%)	34.0	12.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.0	12.5
Total (N)	100	8

F2e: Good communication between my college and other colleges	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	4.5	20.0
3: Agree (%)	47.8	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	43.3	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.5	.
Total (N)	67	5

F3: Dept environ promotes respectful dialogue between diverse perspectives	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	31.1	53.3
3: Agree (%)	52.6	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	12.6	6.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.7	.
Total (N)	135	15

F4a: Frequency given/recvd teaching advice in dept past few years	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.1
Frequently (%)	27.2	33.3
Sometimes (%)	51.5	53.3
Seldom (%)	16.9	6.7
Never (%)	4.4	6.7
Total (N)	136	15

F4b: Frequency given/recvd research/artistic feedback in dept past few yrs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	2.7
Frequently (%)	36.8	20.0
Sometimes (%)	43.4	46.7
Seldom (%)	11.8	13.3
Never (%)	8.1	20.0
Total (N)	136	15

F4c: Frequency given/recvd help with dept/college bureaucracy past few yrs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.4
Frequently (%)	26.5	53.3
Sometimes (%)	52.9	33.3
Seldom (%)	15.4	13.3
Never (%)	5.1	.
Total (N)	136	15

F4d: Frequency given/recvd help undrsnd reappointment, promotion, tenure past few yrs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	2.7
Frequently (%)	34.6	20.0
Sometimes (%)	50.7	46.7
Seldom (%)	11.0	13.3
Never (%)	3.7	20.0
Total (N)	136	15

F4e: Frequency given/recvd help with work/personal balance issues past few yrs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.2	2.2
Frequently (%)	8.1	6.7
Sometimes (%)	31.6	33.3
Seldom (%)	32.4	33.3
Never (%)	27.9	26.7
Total (N)	136	15

F5a: Frequency of collab with faculty in your dept	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.5
Frequently (%)	64.7	60.0
Sometimes (%)	26.5	33.3
Seldom (%)	7.4	6.7
Never (%)	1.5	.
Total (N)	136	15

F5b: Frequency of collab with faculty in other NCSU depts	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.1
Frequently (%)	29.4	46.7
Sometimes (%)	47.1	33.3
Seldom (%)	14.7	6.7
Never (%)	8.8	13.3
Total (N)	136	15

F5c: Frequency of collab with faculty from other universities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8
Frequently (%)	29.4	33.3
Sometimes (%)	41.9	33.3
Seldom (%)	18.4	13.3
Never (%)	10.3	20.0
Total (N)	136	15

F5d: Frequency of collab with non-faculty external to NCSU	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.3
Frequently (%)	24.3	20.0
Sometimes (%)	44.9	26.7
Seldom (%)	22.8	20.0
Never (%)	8.1	33.3
Total (N)	136	15

Back to Top

Section G: Faculty Support & Professional Development

G1a: Satisfaction with level of courses	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	43.5	40.0
3: Satisfied (%)	51.1	60.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	3.8	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	1.5	.
Total (N)	131	15

G1b: Satisfaction with number of courses	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	35.3	40.0
3: Satisfied (%)	51.1	40.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	12.8	20.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	0.8	.
Total (N)	133	15

G1c: Satisfaction with choice in courses	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	40.6	33.3
3: Satisfied (%)	49.6	60.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	7.5	6.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.3	.
Total (N)	133	15

G1d: Satisfaction with course content discretion	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	56.7	60.0
3: Satisfied (%)	41.8	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	0.7	6.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	0.7	.
Total (N)	134	15

G1e: Satisfaction with number of students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	26.9	40.0
3: Satisfied (%)	52.2	40.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	17.2	20.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	3.7	.
Total (N)	134	15

G1f: Satisfaction with quality of undergraduates	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	8.5	14.3
3: Satisfied (%)	66.2	64.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	20.8	21.4
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	4.6	.
Total (N)	130	14

G1g: Satisfaction with quality of graduate students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	17.6	25.0
3: Satisfied (%)	71.0	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	11.5	8.3
Total (N)	131	12

G1h: Satisfaction with access to grad TAs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	16.9	26.7
3: Satisfied (%)	57.7	60.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	22.3	13.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	3.1	.
Total (N)	130	15

G1i: Satisfaction with access to grad RAs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	24.0	20.0
3: Satisfied (%)	55.0	60.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	19.4	20.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	1.6	.
Total (N)	129	10

G2a: NCSU supports innovative teaching	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	26.6	33.3
3: Agree (%)	55.5	53.3
2: Disagree (%)	14.8	13.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.1	.
Total (N)	128	15

G2b: NCSU supports innovative research and scholarly activity	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	30.6	42.9
3: Agree (%)	52.2	42.9
2: Disagree (%)	13.4	7.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.7	7.1
Total (N)	134	14

G2c: NCSU supports innovative creative artistry and literature	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	8.0	50.0
3: Agree (%)	68.0	25.0
2: Disagree (%)	20.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.0	25.0
Total (N)	25	4

G2d: NCSU supports innovative extension/engagement/econ dev activity	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	15.2	22.2
3: Agree (%)	68.7	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	14.1	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.0	11.1
Total (N)	99	9

G3a: NCSU rewards innovative teaching	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	7.0	15.4
3: Agree (%)	51.6	46.2
2: Disagree (%)	30.5	30.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	10.9	7.7
Total (N)	128	13

G3b: NCSU rewards innovative research and scholarly activity	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	32.6	41.7
3: Agree (%)	50.0	16.7
2: Disagree (%)	11.4	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.1	16.7
Total (N)	132	12

G3c: NCSU rewards innovative creative artistry and literature	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	12.5	.
3: Agree (%)	54.2	.
2: Disagree (%)	29.2	100.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.2	.
Total (N)	24	1

G3d: NCSU rewards innovative extension/engagement/econ dev activity	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	12.0	16.7
3: Agree (%)	50.6	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	30.1	16.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.2	16.7
Total (N)	83	6

G4a: Satisfaction: Availability of classroom technology	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	31.1	78.6
3: Satisfied (%)	56.1	14.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	9.8	7.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	3.0	.
Total (N)	132	14

G4b: Satisfaction: Teaching reduction for scholarly/prof growth	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.4	8.3
3: Satisfied (%)	58.7	41.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	24.8	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	10.1	16.7
Total (N)	109	12

G4c: Satisfaction: Teaching workshop/seminar opportunities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	13.4	46.2
3: Satisfied (%)	77.2	46.2
2: Dissatisfied (%)	7.1	7.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.4	.
Total (N)	127	13

G4d: Satisfaction: Avail of funds to attend teaching conference/wrkshp	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.2	2.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	2.2	.
3: Satisfied (%)	33.3	57.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	43.0	14.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	21.5	28.6
Total (N)	93	7

G4e: Satisfaction: Learning technology training/support	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	10.5	46.2
3: Satisfied (%)	74.6	46.2
2: Dissatisfied (%)	10.5	7.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	4.4	.
Total (N)	114	13

G4f: Satisfaction: Campus bookstore meeting course needs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	13.3	36.4
3: Satisfied (%)	79.6	63.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	5.3	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	1.8	.
Total (N)	113	11

G4g: Satisfaction: Availability of funds to present work	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.2	1.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	4.0	.
3: Satisfied (%)	31.2	20.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	45.6	50.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	19.2	30.0
Total (N)	125	10

G4h: Satisfaction: Opportunities for scholarly/professional leave	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	5.4	22.2
3: Satisfied (%)	55.4	55.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	32.6	11.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.5	11.1
Total (N)	92	9

G4i: Satisfaction: Financial support for scholarly/professional leave	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	3.4	16.7
3: Satisfied (%)	34.5	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	47.1	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	14.9	33.3
Total (N)	87	6

G4j: Satisfaction: Leadership development opportunities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	1.2	.
3: Satisfied (%)	63.0	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	29.6	25.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.2	25.0
Total (N)	81	4

G4k: Satisfaction: Support for dept assessment Activities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	3.7	11.1
3: Satisfied (%)	67.6	77.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	25.9	11.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.8	.
Total (N)	108	9

G4l: Satisfaction: Availability of/access to materials via NCSU Libraries	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	39.2	64.3
3: Satisfied (%)	57.7	14.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	2.3	21.4
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	0.8	.
Total (N)	130	14

G4m: Satisfaction: Support with dealing with student concerns	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	12.4	35.7
3: Satisfied (%)	75.2	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	8.8	14.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	3.5	.
Total (N)	113	14

G4n: Satisfaction: Support for technology transfer	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	3.7	.
3: Satisfied (%)	50.5	75.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	21.5	25.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	24.3	.
Total (N)	107	4

G5: Assignment of formal mentor	Male	Female
Yes (%)	20.6	25.0
No (%)	76.5	75.0
Don't know (%)	2.9	.
Total (N)	136	16

G6: Mentor helpfulness	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.0
4: Very helpful (%)	46.4	50.0
3: Somewhat helpful (%)	35.7	25.0
2: Not very helpful (%)	7.1	.
1: Not at all helpful (%)	10.7	25.0
Total (N)	28	4

G7a: Satisfaction: Pre-award support from college for grant/contract	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	10.9	25.0
3: Satisfied (%)	56.3	58.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	21.1	16.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	11.7	.
Total (N)	128	12

G7b: Satisfaction: Post-award support from college for grant/contract	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	8.1	9.1
3: Satisfied (%)	60.5	63.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	21.8	18.2
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	9.7	9.1
Total (N)	124	11

G7c: Satisfaction: Pre-award University support for grant/contract	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	4.3	.
3: Satisfied (%)	59.0	70.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	26.5	30.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	10.3	.
Total (N)	117	10

G7d: Satisfaction: Post-award University support for grant/contract	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	5.4	9.1
3: Satisfied (%)	57.7	63.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	27.0	18.2
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	9.9	9.1
Total (N)	111	11

G7e: Satisfaction: Allocation of indirect grant costs to investigator	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.8	2.0
3: Satisfied (%)	22.7	22.2
2: Dissatisfied (%)	34.5	55.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	42.9	22.2
Total (N)	119	9

G7f: Satisfaction: Allocation of indirect grant costs to department	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.8	2.1
3: Satisfied (%)	24.2	28.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	36.4	57.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	39.4	14.3
Total (N)	99	7

G7g: Satisfaction: PI control over indirect cost allocation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.6	1.9
3: Satisfied (%)	14.2	25.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	33.3	37.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	52.5	37.5
Total (N)	120	8

Back to Top

Section H: Performance Review, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure

H1: Faculty performance review standards are clearly stated	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	28.5	33.3
3: Agree (%)	43.1	46.7
2: Disagree (%)	20.0	13.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.5	6.7
Total (N)	130	15

H2: Faculty performance review procedures are clearly stated	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	32.8	33.3
3: Agree (%)	51.1	46.7
2: Disagree (%)	11.5	13.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.6	6.7
Total (N)	131	15

H3: SME is consistent with departmental vision	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	27.4	30.0
3: Agree (%)	58.4	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	8.8	10.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.3	.
Total (N)	113	10

H4: SME is consistent with departmental promotion standards	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	30.4	36.4
3: Agree (%)	56.9	63.6
2: Disagree (%)	7.8	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.9	.
Total (N)	102	11

H5a: Performance Review feedback appropriately based on SME	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	22.4	50.0
3: Agree (%)	53.1	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	16.3	10.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.2	.
Total (N)	98	10

H5b: Performance Review feedback helpful for professional Development	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	18.3	45.5
3: Agree (%)	47.7	45.5
2: Disagree (%)	27.5	9.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.4	.
Total (N)	109	11

H5c: Performance Review feedback corresponds with my perceptions of own performance	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	15.9	45.5
3: Agree (%)	57.0	45.5
2: Disagree (%)	20.6	9.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.5	.
Total (N)	107	11

H5d: Performance Review feedback helps understand relation to other faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	13.0	36.4
3: Agree (%)	39.8	36.4
2: Disagree (%)	34.3	27.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	13.0	.
Total (N)	108	11

H5e: Feedback given appropriate weight in merit raises	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.5	30.0
3: Agree (%)	57.1	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	17.1	10.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	15.2	10.0
Total (N)	105	10

H6: Understanding of current Academic Tenure Policy	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.5
4: Very well (%)	26.2	20.0
3: Fairly well (%)	45.4	33.3
2: Not very well (%)	22.3	26.7
1: Not at all (%)	6.2	20.0
Total (N)	130	15

H7_1: Participated in RPT process as candidate	Male	Female
No (%)	39.8	50.0
Yes (%)	60.2	50.0
Total (N)	133	16

H7_2: Participated in RPT process as voter	Male	Female
No (%)	35.3	68.8
Yes (%)	64.7	31.3
Total (N)	133	16

H7_3: Participated in RPT process as review committee member	Male	Female
No (%)	58.6	81.3
Yes (%)	41.4	18.8
Total (N)	133	16

H7_4: Have never participated in RPT process	Male	Female
No (%)	85.0	62.5
Yes (%)	15.0	37.5
Total (N)	133	16

H8: Understand dept RPT standards	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	2.9
4: Very well (%)	42.7	40.0
3: Fairly well (%)	40.5	26.7
2: Not very well (%)	12.2	20.0
1: Not at all (%)	4.6	13.3
Total (N)	131	15

H9: Understand dept RPT procedures	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	2.9
4: Very well (%)	46.9	33.3
3: Fairly well (%)	45.4	33.3
2: Not very well (%)	6.2	20.0
1: Not at all (%)	1.5	13.3
Total (N)	130	15

H10: Departmental RPT standards applied consistently/fairly	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	30.8	25.0
3: Agree (%)	51.3	62.5
2: Disagree (%)	10.3	12.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.7	.
Total (N)	117	8

H11: Departmental RPT procedures applied consistently/fairly	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	34.5	30.0
3: Agree (%)	51.7	70.0
2: Disagree (%)	8.6	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.2	.
Total (N)	116	10

H12a: Sufficient resources for teaching/mentoring students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	9.0	12.5
3: Agree (%)	56.6	62.5
2: Disagree (%)	32.0	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.5	.
Total (N)	122	16

H12b: Sufficient resources for discovery of knowledge	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.1	.
3: Agree (%)	52.3	55.6
2: Disagree (%)	33.9	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.7	11.1
Total (N)	109	9

H12c: Sufficient resources for creative artistry and literature	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	1.5
3: Agree (%)	69.6	.
2: Disagree (%)	21.7	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.7	50.0
Total (N)	23	2

H12d: Sufficient resources for tech/managerial innovation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	6.0	.
3: Agree (%)	42.9	75.0
2: Disagree (%)	33.3	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	17.9	.
Total (N)	84	8

H12e: Sufficient resources for extension/engagement	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	1.2	.
3: Agree (%)	58.3	75.0
2: Disagree (%)	31.0	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.5	.
Total (N)	84	4

H12f: Sufficient resources for professional service	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	3.8	.
3: Agree (%)	45.7	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	39.0	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	11.4	.
Total (N)	105	9

H13a: Department rewards teaching/mentoring of students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	11.6	.
3: Agree (%)	51.2	58.3
2: Disagree (%)	28.1	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.1	8.3
Total (N)	121	12

H13b: Department rewards discovery of knowledge	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	26.5	20.0
3: Agree (%)	54.0	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	13.3	30.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.2	10.0
Total (N)	113	10

H13c: Department rewards creative artistry and literature	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	15.0	.
3: Agree (%)	50.0	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	25.0	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	10.0	.
Total (N)	20	2

H13d: Department rewards tech/managerial innovation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	8.1	.
3: Agree (%)	58.1	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	26.7	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.0	.
Total (N)	86	6

H13e: Department rewards extension/engagement	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.2	.
3: Agree (%)	53.4	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	25.0	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	11.4	25.0
Total (N)	88	4

H13f: Department rewards professional service	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	9.3	.
3: Agree (%)	54.2	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	29.0	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.5	.
Total (N)	107	9

Back to Top

Section I: Post-Tenure Review

I1_1: No experience with PTR	Male	Female
Has experience (%)	60.2	33.3
No experience (%)	39.8	66.7
Total (N)	128	12

I1_2: Have had PTR Comprehensive Review	Male	Female
No (%)	56.3	75.0
Yes (%)	43.8	25.0
Total (N)	128	12

I1_3: Have served on PTR committee	Male	Female
No (%)	66.4	75.0
Yes (%)	33.6	25.0
Total (N)	128	12

I1_4: Have been dept/college administrator in PTR process	Male	Female
No (%)	91.4	100.0
Yes (%)	8.6	.
Total (N)	128	12

I1_5: Had other PTR experience	Male	Female
No (%)	95.3	100.0
Yes (%)	4.7	.
Total (N)	128	12

I2a: Easy to find PTR information on NCSU website	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	16.7	14.3
3: Agree (%)	65.6	71.4
2: Disagree (%)	16.7	14.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.0	.
Total (N)	96	7

I2b: PTR process known/understood in department	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	14.6	.
3: Agree (%)	55.2	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	28.1	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.1	.
Total (N)	96	6

I2c: Departmental PTR procedures are clear	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	14.1	.
3: Agree (%)	59.6	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	24.2	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.0	.
Total (N)	99	6

I2d: Departmental PTR standards are clear	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	15.6	16.7
3: Agree (%)	51.0	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	30.2	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.1	.
Total (N)	96	6

I2e: Departmental PTR procedures are followed equitably	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	22.8	.
3: Agree (%)	64.6	80.0
2: Disagree (%)	10.1	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.5	.
Total (N)	79	5

I2f: Departmental PTR standards are applied fairly	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	23.1	20.0
3: Agree (%)	60.3	80.0
2: Disagree (%)	11.5	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.1	.
Total (N)	78	5

I2g: Dept PTR committee members are well prepared and trained	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	17.4	.
3: Agree (%)	56.5	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	18.8	40.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.2	.
Total (N)	69	5

I3: Overall satisfaction with PTR process	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	14.5	.
3: Satisfied (%)	57.8	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	18.1	25.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	9.6	25.0
Total (N)	83	4

Back to Top

Section J: Pay and Compensation

J1a: My salary is competitive within my department	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	9.5	27.3
3: Agree (%)	53.3	45.5
2: Disagree (%)	28.6	18.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.6	9.1
Total (N)	105	11

J1b: My salary is competitive within my college	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	6.7	14.3
3: Agree (%)	41.3	28.6
2: Disagree (%)	40.0	28.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	12.0	28.6
Total (N)	75	7

J1c: My salary is competitive within NC State	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.6	20.0
3: Agree (%)	66.7	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	19.7	40.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.0	.
Total (N)	66	5

J1d: My salary is competitive within UNC system	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	8.1	.
3: Agree (%)	38.7	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	37.1	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	16.1	33.3
Total (N)	62	6

J1e: My salary is competitive within discipline at comparable institutions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.8	2.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	3.0	.
3: Agree (%)	11.9	30.0
2: Disagree (%)	42.6	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	42.6	20.0
Total (N)	101	10

J2: Understand how faculty salaries determined	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.1
4: Very well (%)	9.9	6.7
3: Fairly well (%)	38.2	33.3
2: Not very well (%)	27.5	26.7
1: Not at all (%)	24.4	33.3
Total (N)	131	15

J3: My department links salary increase to meritorious performance	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	14.9	25.0
3: Agree (%)	57.0	58.3
2: Disagree (%)	19.3	16.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.8	.
Total (N)	114	12

J4: I have access to benefits information	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	29.8	26.7
3: Agree (%)	65.6	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	4.6	6.7
Total (N)	131	15

J5: Healthcare benefits are competitive with other institutions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.8	1.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	3.5	.
3: Agree (%)	19.5	23.1
2: Disagree (%)	29.2	46.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	47.8	30.8
Total (N)	113	13

J6: Retirement programs are competitive with other institutions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.2	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	2.8	.
3: Agree (%)	43.4	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	26.4	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	27.4	33.3
Total (N)	106	9

J7: Voluntary benefits programs are competitive with other institutions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	3.5	.
3: Agree (%)	62.4	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	25.9	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.2	33.3
Total (N)	85	6

J8: I am satisfied with my compensation at NC State	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	1.5	6.7
3: Agree (%)	40.0	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	40.8	46.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	17.7	6.7
Total (N)	130	15

J9: Departmental environment enables work/personal life balance	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	15.4	28.6
3: Agree (%)	61.5	57.1
2: Disagree (%)	18.5	14.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.6	.
Total (N)	130	14

J10: NCSU environment enables work/personal life balance	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	11.6	7.1
3: Agree (%)	67.4	64.3
2: Disagree (%)	17.8	28.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.1	.
Total (N)	129	14

J11a: Importance of flexible work hours	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	3.7
4: Very important (%)	71.8	86.7
3: Somewhat important (%)	22.9	.
2: Not very important (%)	3.1	13.3
1: Not at all important (%)	2.3	.
Total (N)	131	15

J11b: Importance of maternity/paternity leave	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.5
4: Very important (%)	63.4	66.7
3: Somewhat important (%)	30.5	26.7
2: Not very important (%)	3.1	.
1: Not at all important (%)	3.1	6.7
Total (N)	131	15

J11c: Importance of family leave time	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.7
4: Very important (%)	60.0	66.7
3: Somewhat important (%)	36.2	33.3
2: Not very important (%)	2.3	.
1: Not at all important (%)	1.5	.
Total (N)	130	15

J11d: Importance of altering tenure clock for family concerns	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.4
4: Very important (%)	55.0	66.7
3: Somewhat important (%)	38.2	20.0
2: Not very important (%)	5.3	.
1: Not at all important (%)	1.5	13.3
Total (N)	131	15

J11e: Importance of childcare facility on or near campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.4
4: Very important (%)	39.7	66.7
3: Somewhat important (%)	42.7	20.0
2: Not very important (%)	13.7	.
1: Not at all important (%)	3.8	13.3
Total (N)	131	15

J11f: Importance of tuition remission for dependents	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	3.5
4: Very important (%)	66.7	66.7
3: Somewhat important (%)	23.3	26.7
2: Not very important (%)	9.3	.
1: Not at all important (%)	0.8	6.7
Total (N)	129	15

Back to Top

Section K: Campus Infrastructure/Physical Environment

K1: I have sufficient clerical/admin support in my dept	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	12.3	14.3
3: Agree (%)	38.5	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	33.1	14.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	16.2	21.4
Total (N)	130	14

K2: I have sufficient tech assistance	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	9.2	14.3
3: Agree (%)	49.6	35.7
2: Disagree (%)	28.2	35.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	13.0	14.3
Total (N)	131	14

K3: There is sufficient support staff in my college	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	8.5	7.7
3: Agree (%)	55.0	61.5
2: Disagree (%)	27.9	23.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.5	7.7
Total (N)	129	13

K4a: Satisfaction with office space	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	31.3	35.7
3: Satisfied (%)	50.4	57.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	15.3	7.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	3.1	.
Total (N)	131	14

K4b: Satisfaction with lab space	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	16.2	27.3
3: Satisfied (%)	53.8	45.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	20.5	27.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	9.4	.
Total (N)	117	11

K4c: Satisfaction with classrooms in which you teach	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	27.9	42.9
3: Satisfied (%)	51.9	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	15.5	7.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	4.7	.
Total (N)	129	14

K4d: Satisfaction with labs in which you teach	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	26.5	40.0
3: Satisfied (%)	45.8	40.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	21.7	20.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.0	.
Total (N)	83	5

K4e: Satisfaction with maintenance of building in which you work	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	13.8	21.4
3: Satisfied (%)	47.7	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	23.8	28.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	14.6	.
Total (N)	130	14

K4f: Satisfaction with infrastructure of bldgs in which you work	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	16.2	42.9
3: Satisfied (%)	46.9	35.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	21.5	14.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	15.4	7.1
Total (N)	130	14

K4g: Satisfaction with availability of up-to-date equipment	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	3.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	8.4	50.0
3: Satisfied (%)	52.7	35.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	29.8	14.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	9.2	.
Total (N)	131	14

K4h: Satisfaction with availability of office supplies	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	11.5	57.1
3: Satisfied (%)	70.8	28.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	16.2	14.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	1.5	.
Total (N)	130	14

K4i: Satisfaction with availability of informal meeting space	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	13.7	28.6
3: Satisfied (%)	58.8	42.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	22.1	28.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.3	.
Total (N)	131	14

K4j: Satisfaction with dining options on campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.0	1.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	1.8	.
3: Satisfied (%)	28.8	.
2: Dissatisfied (%)	37.8	36.4
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	31.5	63.6
Total (N)	111	11

K4k: Satisfaction with availability of parking	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	3.8	.
3: Satisfied (%)	55.4	57.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	30.0	28.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	10.8	14.3
Total (N)	130	14

K4l: Satisfaction with cost of parking	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.2	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	1.5	.
3: Satisfied (%)	36.9	64.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	41.5	21.4
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	20.0	14.3
Total (N)	130	14

K4m: Satisfaction with Wolfline	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	11.8	.
3: Satisfied (%)	66.7	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	13.7	50.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	7.8	.
Total (N)	51	6

K4n: Satisfaction with commute between Centennial and main	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	3.1	.
3: Satisfied (%)	44.9	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	34.7	58.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	17.3	8.3
Total (N)	98	12

K4o: Satisfaction with campus safety	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	5.5	.
3: Satisfied (%)	81.7	83.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	11.9	16.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	0.9	.
Total (N)	109	12

K4p: Satisfaction with campus aesthetics	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	3.2	7.1
3: Satisfied (%)	55.6	64.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	28.6	28.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	12.7	.
Total (N)	126	14

K4q: Satisfaction with upkeep of campus grounds	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	3.9	21.4
3: Satisfied (%)	77.2	71.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	14.2	7.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	4.7	.
Total (N)	127	14

K4r: Satisfaction with amount of green space	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	4.7	7.1
3: Satisfied (%)	58.6	71.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	25.8	21.4
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	10.9	.
Total (N)	128	14

K5a: Satisfaction with energy conservation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	8.7	12.5
3: Satisfied (%)	63.1	62.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	23.3	25.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	4.9	.
Total (N)	103	8

K5b: Satisfaction with water conservation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	9.0	12.5
3: Satisfied (%)	68.0	75.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	19.0	12.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	4.0	.
Total (N)	100	8

K5c: Satisfaction with recycling efforts	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	10.4	33.3
3: Satisfied (%)	73.0	55.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	13.9	11.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.6	.
Total (N)	115	9

K5d: Satisfaction with alternative transportation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	3.1	18.2
3: Satisfied (%)	61.2	63.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	31.6	18.2
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	4.1	.
Total (N)	98	11

K5e: Satisfaction with green building practices	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	3.3	.
3: Satisfied (%)	68.9	57.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	19.7	28.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	8.2	14.3
Total (N)	61	7

K5f: Satisfaction with use of recycled-content resources	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	3.2	.
3: Satisfied (%)	76.2	83.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	19.0	16.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	1.6	.
Total (N)	63	6

K6: Interest in hotel/conference center on Centennial Campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	2.6
4: A lot (%)	46.6	35.7
3: Some (%)	26.7	21.4
2: A little (%)	16.0	14.3
1: None at all (%)	10.7	28.6
Total (N)	131	14

K7: Likelihood of using conference center on Centennial Campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	2.9
4: Very likely (%)	48.5	35.7
3: Somewhat likely (%)	35.4	35.7
2: Not very likely (%)	9.2	14.3
1: Not at all likely (%)	6.9	14.3
Total (N)	130	14

Back to Top

Section L: Recreation/Wellness

L1: Satisfaction with recreation activities on campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	8.6	.
3: Satisfied (%)	69.5	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	20.3	50.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	1.6	.
Total (N)	128	14

L2: Satisfaction with cultural activities on campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.2	7.1
3: Satisfied (%)	69.2	42.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	22.3	42.9
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.3	7.1
Total (N)	130	14

L3a: Satisfaction with Carmichael Gymnasium	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	15.2	30.0
3: Satisfied (%)	67.7	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	15.2	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.0	20.0
Total (N)	99	10

L3b: Satisfaction with recreation space around campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	10.0	14.3
3: Satisfied (%)	65.6	57.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	22.2	28.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.2	.
Total (N)	90	7

L3c: Satisfaction with organized Campus Recreation Activities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	7.1	16.7
3: Satisfied (%)	71.4	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	19.6	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	1.8	.
Total (N)	56	6

L3d: Satisfaction with ARTS NC State programs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	4.9	25.0
3: Satisfied (%)	78.0	37.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	14.6	37.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.4	.
Total (N)	82	8

L3e: Satisfaction with Wolfpack athletic events	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	9.9	28.6
3: Satisfied (%)	80.2	71.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	8.6	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	1.2	.
Total (N)	81	7

L4a: How often use Carmichael Gymnasium	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	2.8
Once a week or more (%)	23.8	21.4
A few times a month (%)	6.9	14.3
A few times a semester (%)	16.2	.
Once a semester (%)	6.2	7.1
Once a year (%)	10.8	.
Never (%)	36.2	57.1
Total (N)	130	14

L4b: How often use recreational space around campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	1.8
Once a week or more (%)	9.9	.
A few times a month (%)	11.5	.
A few times a semester (%)	13.0	14.3
Once a semester (%)	8.4	14.3
Once a year (%)	16.0	7.1
Never (%)	41.2	64.3
Total (N)	131	14

L4c: How often participate in organized Campus Recreation Activities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.7	1.3
Once a week or more (%)	0.8	.
A few times a month (%)	3.9	7.1
A few times a semester (%)	7.8	.
Once a semester (%)	7.8	.
Once a year (%)	7.8	.
Never (%)	71.9	92.9
Total (N)	128	14

L4d: How often attend ARTS NC State programs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.2	2.1
A few times a month (%)	0.8	7.1
A few times a semester (%)	19.2	14.3
Once a semester (%)	19.2	14.3
Once a year (%)	22.3	14.3
Never (%)	38.5	50.0
Total (N)	130	14

L4e: How often attend Wolfpack athletic events	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.2
A few times a month (%)	3.9	7.1
A few times a semester (%)	24.2	7.1
Once a semester (%)	14.1	28.6
Once a year (%)	15.6	14.3
Never (%)	42.2	42.9
Total (N)	128	14

L5: Interest in designated faculty-only dining facility	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.9
4: A great deal (%)	30.5	50.0
3: Some (%)	27.5	14.3
2: A little (%)	18.3	14.3
1: None at all (%)	23.7	21.4
Total (N)	131	14

L6: Likelihood of using gym on Centennial campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.1
4: Very likely (%)	48.1	42.9
3: Somewhat likely (%)	25.2	28.6
2: Not very likely (%)	16.0	28.6
1: Not at all likely (%)	10.7	.
Total (N)	131	14

Back to Top

Section M: Work Activities

M1: Total hours per week spent performing job-related work (collapsed)	Male	Female
Mean # Hrs Work	59.2	56.8
more than 60 hrs (%)	29.2	21.4
51 to 60 hrs (%)	43.1	35.7
41 to 50 hrs (%)	23.1	42.9
40 hrs or less (%)	4.6	.
Total (N)	130	14

M2A: Proportion of total hours spent on teaching/mentoring	Male	Female
Mean % of Time on Activity	36.6	43.2
more than 50% of time (%)	11.4	20.0
26% to 50% of time (%)	62.1	66.7
11% to 25% of time (%)	23.5	13.3
6% to 10% of time (%)	2.3	.
0% of time (%)	0.8	.
Total (N)	132	15

M2a_1r: Includes teaching (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	Male	Female
No (%)	10.7	20.0
Yes (%)	89.3	80.0
Total (N)	131	15

M2a_2r: Includes professional development to improve teaching (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	Male	Female
No (%)	58.0	66.7
Yes (%)	42.0	33.3
Total (N)	131	15

M2a_3r: Includes research projects with students (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	Male	Female
No (%)	22.1	46.7
Yes (%)	77.9	53.3
Total (N)	131	15

M2a_4r: Includes supervising internships/field experiences (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	Male	Female
No (%)	77.1	86.7
Yes (%)	22.9	13.3
Total (N)	131	15

M2a_5r: Includes student thesis/dissertation committee work (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	Male	Female
No (%)	22.9	46.7
Yes (%)	77.1	53.3
Total (N)	131	15

M2B: Proportion of total hours spent advising students	Male	Female
Mean % of Time on Activity	8.4	12.9
more than 50% of time (%)	0.8	.
26% to 50% of time (%)	3.0	26.7
11% to 25% of time (%)	12.1	.
6% to 10% of time (%)	20.5	6.7
1% to 5% of time (%)	56.8	46.7
0% of time (%)	6.8	20.0
Total (N)	132	15

M2b_1r: Includes formal advising (among those reporting time spent on advising)	Male	Female
No (%)	32.5	33.3
Yes (%)	67.5	66.7
Total (N)	123	12

M2b_2r: Includes informal advising (among those reporting time spent on advising)	Male	Female
No (%)	31.7	16.7
Yes (%)	68.3	83.3
Total (N)	123	12

M2C: Proportion of total hours spent on research/scholarly Activities	Male	Female
Mean % of Time on Activity	32.9	25.2
more than 50% of time (%)	4.5	6.7
26% to 50% of time (%)	62.1	40.0
11% to 25% of time (%)	19.7	13.3
6% to 10% of time (%)	2.3	.
1% to 5% of time (%)	3.8	13.3
0% of time (%)	7.6	26.7
Total (N)	132	15

M2D: Proportion of total hours spent on creative artistry/literature	Male	Female
Mean % of Time on Activity	1.2	0.0
11% to 25% of time (%)	2.3	.
6% to 10% of time (%)	4.5	.
1% to 5% of time (%)	6.8	.
0% of time (%)	86.4	100.0
Total (N)	132	15

M2E: Proportion of total hours spent on extension/engagement/econ dev	Male	Female
Mean % of Time on Activity	3.1	0.0
26% to 50% of time (%)	3.0	.
11% to 25% of time (%)	0.8	.
6% to 10% of time (%)	7.6	.
1% to 5% of time (%)	24.2	.
0% of time (%)	64.4	100.0
Total (N)	132	15

M2e_1r: Includes service learning teaching/mentoring (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	Male
No (%)	68.1
Yes (%)	31.9
Total (N)	47

M2e_2r: Includes extension education/non-credit programs (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	Male
No (%)	61.7
Yes (%)	38.3
Total (N)	47

M2e_3r: Includes economic development training/tech assistance (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	Male
No (%)	78.7
Yes (%)	21.3
Total (N)	47

M2e_4r: Includes partnering with private sector - job/investment creation (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	Male
No (%)	59.6
Yes (%)	40.4
Total (N)	47

M2e_5r: Public service grants/contracts (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	Male
No (%)	83.0
Yes (%)	17.0
Total (N)	47

M2F: Proportion of total hours spent on service work	Male	Female
Mean % of Time on Activity	10.6	16.0
26% to 50% of time (%)	3.0	13.3
11% to 25% of time (%)	26.5	40.0
6% to 10% of time (%)	33.3	33.3
1% to 5% of time (%)	32.6	13.3
0% of time (%)	4.5	.
Total (N)	132	15

M2f_1r: Includes advising student groups (among those reporting time spent on service work)	Male	Female
No (%)	69.8	66.7
Yes (%)	30.2	33.3
Total (N)	126	15

M2f_2r: Includes dept/college/university committees (among those reporting time spent on service work)	Male	Female
No (%)	16.7	20.0
Yes (%)	83.3	80.0
Total (N)	126	15

M2f_3r: Includes professional service (among those reporting time spent on service work)	Male	Female
No (%)	32.5	53.3
Yes (%)	67.5	46.7
Total (N)	126	15

M2f_4r: Includes academic program assessment activities (among those reporting time spent on service work)	Male	Female
No (%)	72.2	66.7
Yes (%)	27.8	33.3
Total (N)	126	15

M2f_5r: Includes other university service (among those reporting time spent on service work)	Male	Female
No (%)	73.8	86.7
Yes (%)	26.2	13.3
Total (N)	126	15

M2G: Proportion of total hours spent on tech/managerial innovation	Male	Female
Mean % of Time on Activity	1.1	0.3
6% to 10% of time (%)	1.5	.
1% to 5% of time (%)	25.0	6.7
0% of time (%)	73.5	93.3
Total (N)	132	15

M2H: Proportion of total hours spent on dept/college admin duties	Male	Female
Mean % of Time on Activity	5.4	2.3
more than 50% of time (%)	1.5	.
26% to 50% of time (%)	4.5	.
11% to 25% of time (%)	5.3	6.7
6% to 10% of time (%)	7.6	6.7
1% to 5% of time (%)	18.2	6.7
0% of time (%)	62.9	80.0
Total (N)	132	15

M3_1: Worked summer at NCSU without overload pay	Male	Female
No (%)	31.8	26.7
Yes (%)	68.2	73.3
Total (N)	132	15

M3_2: Taught at NCSU on overload basis	Male	Female
No (%)	77.3	73.3
Yes (%)	22.7	26.7
Total (N)	132	15

M3_3: Taught NCSU distance education class	Male	Female
No (%)	56.1	66.7
Yes (%)	43.9	33.3
Total (N)	132	15

M3_4: Taught for another academic institution	Male	Female
No (%)	94.7	86.7
Yes (%)	5.3	13.3
Total (N)	132	15

M3_5: Did outside consulting/freelance for pay	Male	Female
No (%)	50.8	73.3
Yes (%)	49.2	26.7
Total (N)	132	15

M3_6: Did outside consulting/freelance without pay	Male	Female
No (%)	66.7	73.3
Yes (%)	33.3	26.7
Total (N)	132	15

M3_7: Had other secondary employment	Male	Female
No (%)	98.5	100.0
Yes (%)	1.5	.
Total (N)	132	15

M4: Frequency of volunteer work past 2 years	Male	Female
Never (%)	15.5	26.7
A few times (%)	57.4	20.0
About once per month (%)	10.1	20.0
Two or three times per month (%)	5.4	33.3
At least once per week (%)	11.6	.
Total (N)	129	15

M5: Frequency of public policy work past 5 years	Male	Female
Never (%)	55.5	78.6
Once or twice (%)	22.7	7.1
Three to five times (%)	11.7	7.1
Six to ten times (%)	4.7	.
More than 10 times (%)	5.5	7.1
Total (N)	128	14

M6: Management of work-related demands of past 2 years	Male	Female
1: Managing everything just fine (%)	3.9	.
2 (%)	26.4	13.3
3 (%)	38.0	53.3
4 (%)	27.9	26.7
5: Completely overwhelmed (%)	3.9	6.7
Total (N)	129	15

M7: Change how you spend your work time	Male	Female
I would change how I spent time (%)	62.7	64.3
I would not change a thing (%)	37.3	35.7
Total (N)	118	14

Back to Top

Section N: Conclusions/Overall Satisfaction

N1: Satisfaction with your "fit" in department	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	29.0	20.0
3: Satisfied (%)	47.3	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	19.1	13.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	4.6	.
Total (N)	131	15

N2: I generally feel valued in my department	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	30.5	20.0
3: Agree (%)	48.1	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	17.6	13.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.8	.
Total (N)	131	15

N3a: I am treated with respect by my students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	49.6	46.7
3: Agree (%)	46.6	46.7
2: Disagree (%)	3.8	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	6.7
Total (N)	131	15

N3b: I am treated with respect by dept support staff	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	50.4	73.3
3: Agree (%)	45.0	20.0
2: Disagree (%)	3.8	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	0.8	6.7
Total (N)	131	15

N3c: I am treated with respect faculty in my dept	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	38.2	46.7
3: Agree (%)	52.7	46.7
2: Disagree (%)	7.6	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.5	6.7
Total (N)	131	15

N3d: I am treated with respect by NCSU administrators	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	21.7	46.7
3: Agree (%)	58.1	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	11.6	6.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.5	13.3
Total (N)	129	15

N4: I would recommend my department as a good place to work	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	27.5	26.7
3: Agree (%)	56.5	73.3
2: Disagree (%)	11.5	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.6	.
Total (N)	131	15

N5a: Amount of stress due to reappointment, promotion or tenure	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.5
4: A great deal (%)	22.9	18.2
3: Some (%)	33.1	45.5
2: A little (%)	18.6	9.1
1: None at all (%)	25.4	27.3
Total (N)	118	11

N5b: Amount of stress from research/publication demands	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.2
4: A great deal (%)	37.7	33.3
3: Some (%)	34.6	50.0
2: A little (%)	16.9	16.7
1: None at all (%)	10.8	.
Total (N)	130	12

N5c: Amount of stress from professional Development	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.7
4: A great deal (%)	14.1	15.4
3: Some (%)	39.8	53.8
2: A little (%)	25.8	15.4
1: None at all (%)	20.3	15.4
Total (N)	128	13

N5d: Amount of stress from institutional procedures	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.5
4: A great deal (%)	29.0	18.2
3: Some (%)	36.3	36.4
2: A little (%)	23.4	27.3
1: None at all (%)	11.3	18.2
Total (N)	124	11

N5e: Amount of stress from committee work	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.9
4: A great deal (%)	12.3	26.7
3: Some (%)	38.5	40.0
2: A little (%)	33.1	26.7
1: None at all (%)	16.2	6.7
Total (N)	130	15

N5f: Amount of stress from relationships with students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.0	2.3
4: A great deal (%)	6.9	6.7
3: Some (%)	16.8	40.0
2: A little (%)	41.2	33.3
1: None at all (%)	35.1	20.0
Total (N)	131	15

N5g: Amount of stress from relationships with faculty in dept	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.2	2.0
4: A great deal (%)	9.3	6.7
3: Some (%)	25.6	13.3
2: A little (%)	43.4	53.3
1: None at all (%)	21.7	26.7
Total (N)	129	15

N5h: Amount of stress from relationships w/dept admin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.1
4: A great deal (%)	14.6	6.7
3: Some (%)	28.5	26.7
2: A little (%)	27.7	33.3
1: None at all (%)	29.2	33.3
Total (N)	130	15

N5i: Amount of stress from relationships w/college admin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.0	1.4
4: A great deal (%)	7.4	.
3: Some (%)	21.5	.
2: A little (%)	33.9	36.4
1: None at all (%)	37.2	63.6
Total (N)	121	11

N5j: Amount of stress from workload	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.2
4: A great deal (%)	33.1	40.0
3: Some (%)	40.0	40.0
2: A little (%)	19.2	20.0
1: None at all (%)	7.7	.
Total (N)	130	15

N5k: Amount of stress from work/personal life balance	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.1
4: A great deal (%)	33.1	40.0
3: Some (%)	45.4	40.0
2: A little (%)	14.6	13.3
1: None at all (%)	6.9	6.7
Total (N)	130	15

N5l: Amount of stress from working with under-prepared students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8
4: A great deal (%)	19.5	26.7
3: Some (%)	45.3	46.7
2: A little (%)	27.3	6.7
1: None at all (%)	7.8	20.0
Total (N)	128	15

N5m: Amount of stress from self-assessment Activities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	1.9
4: A great deal (%)	10.1	.
3: Some (%)	27.9	33.3
2: A little (%)	45.0	26.7
1: None at all (%)	17.1	40.0
Total (N)	129	15

N5n: Amount of stress from program assessment requirements	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.2
4: A great deal (%)	13.6	15.4
3: Some (%)	32.0	23.1
2: A little (%)	40.8	30.8
1: None at all (%)	13.6	30.8
Total (N)	125	13

N6: Overall satisfaction with NCSU	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	10.0	20.0
3: Satisfied (%)	65.4	80.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	22.3	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.3	.
Total (N)	130	15

N7: More or less satisfied with NC State, compared to 5 yrs ago	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	3.8
A lot more satisfied now (%)	5.4	21.4
Somewhat more satisfied now (%)	24.6	50.0
Neither more or less satisfied now (%)	27.7	14.3
Somewhat less satisfied now (%)	30.0	14.3
A lot less satisfied now (%)	12.3	.
Total (N)	130	14

N8: Ever considered leaving NC State for another university	Male	Female
No - never considered leaving (%)	17.7	46.7
Yes - not very seriously (%)	28.5	6.7
Yes - somewhat seriously (%)	29.2	33.3
Yes - very seriously (%)	24.6	13.3
Total (N)	130	15

N10: Ever considered leaving academe, since coming to NC State	Male	Female
No - never considered leaving (%)	46.6	60.0
Yes - not very seriously (%)	26.0	6.7
Yes - somewhat seriously (%)	14.5	20.0
Yes - very seriously (%)	13.0	13.3
Total (N)	131	15

Back to top

For more information on the NC State University 2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey contact:
Dr. Nancy Whelchel, Associate Director for Survey Research
Office of Institutional Planning and Research
Box 7002
NCSU
Phone: (919) 515-4184
Email: ncsu_surveys@ncsu.edu

Posted: April, 2007

To download a Microsoft Word version of this document, click here.

Return to COE Results Index

Return to 2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey Table of Contents Page