NC State logo

North Carolina State University
2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey:

Results for the College of Natural Resources
by Rank/Tenure Status1

To skip directly to a particular section, select the section below.

Section B: Image and Vision Section I: Post-Tenure Review
Section C: Leadership Section J: Pay and Compensation
Section D: Faculty-Administration Relationships Section K: Campus Infrastructure/Physical Environment
Section E: Diversity/Multiculturalism Section L: Recreation/Wellness
Section F: Working Relationships Section M: Work Activities
Section G: Faculty Support & Professional Development Section N: Conclusions/Overall Satisfaction
Section H: Performance Review, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure

To download a Microsoft Word version of this document, click here.


A2: Ever held an administrative position Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
..... No (%) 61.9 90.9 100.0 100.0
..... Yes (%) 38.1 9.1 . .
Total (N) 21 22 9 9
Back to Top

Section B: Image and Vision

B1a: Department doing good job of recruiting faculty Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.9 3.1 3.2 2.9
4: Strongly agree (%) 23.8 22.7 44.4 11.1
3: Agree (%) 47.6 63.6 33.3 66.7
2: Disagree (%) 19.0 13.6 22.2 22.2
1: Strongly disagree (%) 9.5 . . .
Total (N) 21 22 9 9

B1b: Department creating culture where faculty can develop to full potential Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.7 2.8 3.6 2.8
4: Strongly agree (%) 15.8 18.2 55.6 .
3: Agree (%) 52.6 54.5 44.4 75.0
2: Disagree (%) 21.1 18.2 . 25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%) 10.5 9.1 . .
Total (N) 19 22 9 8

B1c: Department retaining most effective and productive faculty Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.9 2.9 3.1 2.8
4: Strongly agree (%) 23.8 19.0 22.2 12.5
3: Agree (%) 47.6 57.1 66.7 62.5
2: Disagree (%) 19.0 19.0 11.1 12.5
1: Strongly disagree (%) 9.5 4.8 . 12.5
Total (N) 21 21 9 8

B2a: Department national reputation for undergraduate educ Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.9 4.2 3.8 4.5
5: Very strong (%) 23.8 42.9 11.1 62.5
4: Strong (%) 47.6 42.9 55.6 25.0
3: Average (%) 19.0 9.5 33.3 12.5
2: Weak (%) 9.5 4.8 . .
Total (N) 21 21 9 8

B2b: Department national reputation for graduate education Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.6 3.9 4.0 4.0
5: Very strong (%) 14.3 19.0 11.1 25.0
4: Strong (%) 57.1 57.1 77.8 62.5
3: Average (%) 9.5 14.3 11.1 .
2: Weak (%) 14.3 9.5 . 12.5
1: Very weak (%) 4.8 . . .
Total (N) 21 21 9 8

B2c: Department national reputation for research & scholarly activity Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.6 3.9 4.1 4.1
5: Very strong (%) 14.3 14.3 22.2 33.3
4: Strong (%) 38.1 66.7 66.7 55.6
3: Average (%) 38.1 14.3 11.1 .
2: Weak (%) 9.5 4.8 . 11.1
Total (N) 21 21 9 9

B2d: Department national reputation for creative artistry and literature Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 1.8 3.0 3.3 3.0
4: Strong (%) . 30.0 33.3 40.0
3: Average (%) 20.0 40.0 66.7 20.0
2: Weak (%) 40.0 30.0 . 40.0
1: Very weak (%) 40.0 . . .
Total (N) 5 10 3 5

B2e: Department national reputation for tech & managerial innovation Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.3 3.3 3.6 3.4
5: Very strong (%) 7.7 11.1 . .
4: Strong (%) 38.5 33.3 57.1 57.1
3: Average (%) 30.8 38.9 42.9 28.6
2: Weak (%) 23.1 11.1 . 14.3
1: Very weak (%) . 5.6 . .
Total (N) 13 18 7 7

B2f: Department national reputation for extension & engagement Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 4.1 4.5 4.5 4.2
5: Very strong (%) 38.9 60.0 50.0 55.6
4: Strong (%) 50.0 30.0 50.0 22.2
3: Average (%) . 10.0 . 11.1
2: Weak (%) 5.6 . . 11.1
1: Very weak (%) 5.6 . . .
Total (N) 18 20 8 9

B2g: Department national reputation for contrib to econ Development Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.8 3.6 3.9 3.9
5: Very strong (%) 18.8 23.8 22.2 28.6
4: Strong (%) 56.3 38.1 44.4 42.9
3: Average (%) 18.8 19.0 33.3 14.3
2: Weak (%) . 14.3 . 14.3
1: Very weak (%) 6.3 4.8 . .
Total (N) 16 21 9 7

B3a: Grade undergraduate majors' ability to meet prog demands Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.9 3.5 4.1 4.2
A (%) 19.0 4.8 22.2 22.2
B (%) 57.1 61.9 66.7 77.8
C (%) 19.0 19.0 11.1 .
D (%) . 9.5 . .
F (%) 4.8 4.8 . .
Total (N) 21 21 9 9

B3b: Grade graduate student ability to meet prog demands Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 4.3 4.0 4.1 4.3
A (%) 47.6 22.7 22.2 50.0
B (%) 38.1 63.6 66.7 25.0
C (%) 14.3 9.1 11.1 25.0
D (%) . 4.5 . .
Total (N) 21 22 9 8

B3c: Grade demonstrated professional ability of faculty Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 4.1 4.2 4.6 4.4
A (%) 28.6 45.5 55.6 55.6
B (%) 52.4 36.4 44.4 33.3
C (%) 19.0 13.6 . 11.1
F (%) . 4.5 . .
Total (N) 21 22 9 9

B3d: Grade professional achievement of faculty Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 4.0 4.0 4.2 4.4
A (%) 23.8 31.8 33.3 55.6
B (%) 57.1 50.0 55.6 33.3
C (%) 9.5 13.6 11.1 11.1
D (%) 9.5 . . .
F (%) . 4.5 . .
Total (N) 21 22 9 9

B3e: Grade own demonstrated professional ability Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 4.6 4.2 4.1 4.6
A (%) 57.1 31.8 33.3 55.6
B (%) 42.9 59.1 44.4 44.4
C (%) . 9.1 22.2 .
Total (N) 21 22 9 9

B3f: Grade own professional achievement Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 4.5 4.3 4.1 4.3
A (%) 52.4 31.8 33.3 33.3
B (%) 47.6 63.6 44.4 66.7
C (%) . 4.5 22.2 .
Total (N) 21 22 9 9

B4: Department's vision for the future Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Clear vision; actively working toward goals (%) 19.0 31.8 44.4 33.3
Vision with slow progress (%) 38.1 36.4 44.4 66.7
No clear vision (%) 42.9 18.2 11.1 .
Not familiar (%) . 13.6 . .
Total (N) 21 22 9 9

B5: Agreement with department vision for future Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.4 3.3 3.6 3.0
4: Strongly agree (%) 41.7 33.3 62.5 11.1
3: Agree (%) 58.3 66.7 37.5 77.8
2: Disagree (%) . . . 11.1
Total (N) 12 15 8 9

B6: College's vision for the future Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Clear vision; actively working toward goals (%) 19.0 31.8 44.4 22.2
Vision with slow progress (%) 19.0 27.3 55.6 33.3
No clear vision (%) 42.9 22.7 . 22.2
Not familiar (%) 19.0 18.2 . 22.2
Total (N) 21 22 9 9

B7a: Department change in next five years Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Change for the better (%) 61.9 63.6 88.9 55.6
Change for the worse (%) 19.0 9.1 11.1 22.2
Not really change (%) 19.0 27.3 . 22.2
Total (N) 21 22 9 9

B7b: College change in next five years Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Change for the better (%) 42.9 50.0 77.8 66.7
Change for the worse (%) 19.0 9.1 . 11.1
Not really change (%) 38.1 40.9 22.2 22.2
Total (N) 21 22 9 9

B7c: NC State change in next five years Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Change for the better (%) 38.1 45.5 77.8 55.6
Change for the worse (%) 14.3 18.2 . 11.1
Not really change (%) 47.6 36.4 22.2 33.3
Total (N) 21 22 9 9
Back to Top

Section C: Leadership

C1a: Dept admin communication with faculty Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.8 2.9 3.2 3.3
4: Excellent (%) 33.3 31.8 55.6 55.6
3: Good (%) 33.3 40.9 11.1 22.2
2: Fair (%) 14.3 13.6 33.3 22.2
1: Poor (%) 19.0 13.6 . .
Total (N) 21 22 9 9

C1b: Dept admin seek faculty input for dept vision Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.9 3.0 3.2 3.4
4: Excellent (%) 33.3 38.1 33.3 55.6
3: Good (%) 38.1 28.6 55.6 33.3
2: Fair (%) 9.5 28.6 11.1 11.1
1: Poor (%) 19.0 4.8 . .
Total (N) 21 21 9 9

C1c: Dept admin use faculty ideas in decision-making Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.9 2.9 3.1 3.2
4: Excellent (%) 35.0 27.3 33.3 33.3
3: Good (%) 40.0 45.5 44.4 55.6
2: Fair (%) 5.0 13.6 22.2 11.1
1: Poor (%) 20.0 13.6 . .
Total (N) 20 22 9 9

C1d: Dept admin delegate dept responsibility to faculty Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.0 2.9 3.1 2.9
4: Excellent (%) 33.3 26.3 44.4 11.1
3: Good (%) 42.9 47.4 33.3 66.7
2: Fair (%) 14.3 15.8 11.1 22.2
1: Poor (%) 9.5 10.5 11.1 .
Total (N) 21 19 9 9

C1e: Dept admin grant faculty autonomy Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.4 3.0 3.4 3.6
4: Excellent (%) 72.2 31.8 66.7 66.7
3: Good (%) 5.6 45.5 22.2 22.2
2: Fair (%) 11.1 13.6 . 11.1
1: Poor (%) 11.1 9.1 11.1 .
Total (N) 18 22 9 9

C1f: Dept admin set clear and explicit priorities Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.3 2.5 3.1 2.8
4: Excellent (%) 10.5 9.5 50.0 22.2
3: Good (%) 36.8 33.3 25.0 44.4
2: Fair (%) 26.3 52.4 12.5 22.2
1: Poor (%) 26.3 4.8 12.5 11.1
Total (N) 19 21 8 9

C1g: Dept admin appreciate your contrib to mission Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.0 2.7 3.4 2.9
4: Excellent (%) 42.9 18.2 66.7 33.3
3: Good (%) 28.6 45.5 22.2 33.3
2: Fair (%) 9.5 22.7 . 22.2
1: Poor (%) 19.0 13.6 11.1 11.1
Total (N) 21 22 9 9

C1h: Dept admin conflict resolution Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.7 2.6 3.0 2.4
4: Excellent (%) 26.3 11.1 44.4 14.3
3: Good (%) 42.1 55.6 22.2 42.9
2: Fair (%) 10.5 11.1 22.2 14.3
1: Poor (%) 21.1 22.2 11.1 28.6
Total (N) 19 18 9 7

C1i: Dept admin provide necessary resources Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.4 2.6 3.0 2.3
4: Excellent (%) 4.8 13.6 33.3 22.2
3: Good (%) 47.6 50.0 44.4 22.2
2: Fair (%) 33.3 18.2 11.1 22.2
1: Poor (%) 14.3 18.2 11.1 33.3
Total (N) 21 22 9 9

C1j: Dept admin allocate resources fairly Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.9 2.7 3.3 2.5
4: Excellent (%) 25.0 15.0 44.4 12.5
3: Good (%) 50.0 45.0 44.4 37.5
2: Fair (%) 10.0 35.0 11.1 37.5
1: Poor (%) 15.0 5.0 . 12.5
Total (N) 20 20 9 8

C1k: Dept admin serve as advocate for dept to college Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.3 2.9 3.6 3.4
4: Excellent (%) 55.0 25.0 55.6 50.0
3: Good (%) 30.0 45.0 44.4 37.5
2: Fair (%) 5.0 25.0 . 12.5
1: Poor (%) 10.0 5.0 . .
Total (N) 20 20 9 8

C1l: Dept admin support academic freedom Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.5 3.1 3.8 3.6
4: Excellent (%) 70.0 33.3 75.0 75.0
3: Good (%) 15.0 52.4 25.0 12.5
2: Fair (%) 10.0 4.8 . 12.5
1: Poor (%) 5.0 9.5 . .
Total (N) 20 21 8 8

C1m: Dept admin make rational decisions Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.0 2.8 3.2 3.3
4: Excellent (%) 35.0 19.0 33.3 37.5
3: Good (%) 45.0 47.6 55.6 50.0
2: Fair (%) 5.0 23.8 11.1 12.5
1: Poor (%) 15.0 9.5 . .
Total (N) 20 21 9 8

C1n: Dept admin make equitable decisions Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.9 2.7 3.4 2.9
4: Excellent (%) 35.0 9.5 55.6 25.0
3: Good (%) 40.0 57.1 33.3 50.0
2: Fair (%) 5.0 23.8 11.1 12.5
1: Poor (%) 20.0 9.5 . 12.5
Total (N) 20 21 9 8

C1o: Dept admin promote diversity within dept Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.1 3.1 3.3 3.1
4: Excellent (%) 30.0 25.0 62.5 37.5
3: Good (%) 55.0 60.0 12.5 37.5
2: Fair (%) 10.0 10.0 12.5 25.0
1: Poor (%) 5.0 5.0 12.5 .
Total (N) 20 20 8 8

C2a: College admin communication with faculty Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.4 2.4 3.4 2.8
4: Excellent (%) 11.1 . 37.5 .
3: Good (%) 38.9 57.9 62.5 77.8
2: Fair (%) 33.3 26.3 . 22.2
1: Poor (%) 16.7 15.8 . .
Total (N) 18 19 8 9

C2b: College admin seek faculty input for vision Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.0 2.4 3.1 2.8
4: Excellent (%) 5.9 . 25.0 .
3: Good (%) 23.5 61.1 62.5 77.8
2: Fair (%) 35.3 22.2 12.5 22.2
1: Poor (%) 35.3 16.7 . .
Total (N) 17 18 8 9

C2c: College admin use faculty ideas in decision-making Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.3 2.3 3.3 2.8
4: Excellent (%) 12.5 . 37.5 .
3: Good (%) 31.3 50.0 50.0 75.0
2: Fair (%) 25.0 31.3 12.5 25.0
1: Poor (%) 31.3 18.8 . .
Total (N) 16 16 8 8

C2d: College admin grant departmental autonomy Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.2 2.9 3.5 3.1
4: Excellent (%) 38.9 13.3 50.0 33.3
3: Good (%) 50.0 73.3 50.0 44.4
2: Fair (%) . 6.7 . 22.2
1: Poor (%) 11.1 6.7 . .
Total (N) 18 15 8 9

C2e: College admin set clear and explicit priorities Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.1 2.3 3.3 2.8
4: Excellent (%) 12.5 . 25.0 22.2
3: Good (%) 18.8 50.0 75.0 44.4
2: Fair (%) 31.3 31.3 . 22.2
1: Poor (%) 37.5 18.8 . 11.1
Total (N) 16 16 8 9

C2f: College admin appreciate your contrib to mission Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.5 2.3 2.9 2.8
4: Excellent (%) 11.8 12.5 12.5 .
3: Good (%) 47.1 31.3 75.0 87.5
2: Fair (%) 17.6 25.0 . .
1: Poor (%) 23.5 31.3 12.5 12.5
Total (N) 17 16 8 8

C2g: College admin conflict resolution Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.6 2.5 3.1 2.7
4: Excellent (%) 14.3 . 25.0 16.7
3: Good (%) 42.9 60.0 62.5 50.0
2: Fair (%) 28.6 30.0 12.5 16.7
1: Poor (%) 14.3 10.0 . 16.7
Total (N) 14 10 8 6

C2h: College admin provide necessary resources Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.5 2.5 3.1 2.1
4: Excellent (%) 15.8 10.5 37.5 12.5
3: Good (%) 42.1 47.4 37.5 25.0
2: Fair (%) 21.1 26.3 25.0 25.0
1: Poor (%) 21.1 15.8 . 37.5
Total (N) 19 19 8 8

C2i: College admin allocate resources fairly Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.4 2.5 3.1 2.3
4: Excellent (%) . 6.3 37.5 .
3: Good (%) 58.8 50.0 37.5 42.9
2: Fair (%) 17.6 31.3 25.0 42.9
1: Poor (%) 23.5 12.5 . 14.3
Total (N) 17 16 8 7

C2j: College admin serve as advocate for college to univ Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.9 2.9 3.4 3.5
4: Excellent (%) 18.8 14.3 37.5 62.5
3: Good (%) 62.5 64.3 62.5 25.0
2: Fair (%) 6.3 21.4 . 12.5
1: Poor (%) 12.5 . . .
Total (N) 16 14 8 8

C2k: College admin support academic freedom Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.3 3.1 3.6 3.4
4: Excellent (%) 44.4 16.7 62.5 37.5
3: Good (%) 50.0 77.8 37.5 62.5
1: Poor (%) 5.6 5.6 . .
Total (N) 18 18 8 8

C2l: College admin make rational decisions Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.6 2.8 3.4 3.3
4: Excellent (%) 12.5 . 37.5 37.5
3: Good (%) 56.3 81.3 62.5 50.0
2: Fair (%) 12.5 12.5 . 12.5
1: Poor (%) 18.8 6.3 . .
Total (N) 16 16 8 8

C2m: College admin make equitable decisions Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.7 2.7 3.3 2.9
4: Excellent (%) 13.3 6.7 50.0 12.5
3: Good (%) 60.0 60.0 25.0 62.5
2: Fair (%) 13.3 26.7 25.0 25.0
1: Poor (%) 13.3 6.7 . .
Total (N) 15 15 8 8

C2n: College admin promote diversity within college Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.3 3.2 3.3 3.6
4: Excellent (%) 42.1 47.4 57.1 71.4
3: Good (%) 52.6 36.8 28.6 14.3
2: Fair (%) . 5.3 . 14.3
1: Poor (%) 5.3 10.5 14.3 .
Total (N) 19 19 7 7

C3a: Univ admin communication with faculty Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.2 2.3 2.3 2.4
4: Excellent (%) . 5.0 . .
3: Good (%) 45.0 35.0 42.9 50.0
2: Fair (%) 30.0 45.0 42.9 37.5
1: Poor (%) 25.0 15.0 14.3 12.5
Total (N) 20 20 7 8

C3b: Univ admin use faculty ideas in decision-making Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.2 2.2 2.6 2.5
4: Excellent (%) . 13.3 . 16.7
3: Good (%) 41.2 20.0 57.1 33.3
2: Fair (%) 35.3 40.0 42.9 33.3
1: Poor (%) 23.5 26.7 . 16.7
Total (N) 17 15 7 6

C3c: Univ admin set clear and explicit priorities Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.4 2.3 2.8 2.9
4: Excellent (%) . 5.9 22.2 14.3
3: Good (%) 52.6 41.2 44.4 71.4
2: Fair (%) 31.6 29.4 22.2 .
1: Poor (%) 15.8 23.5 11.1 14.3
Total (N) 19 17 9 7

C3d: Univ admin serves as advocate for univ to constituents Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.7 2.6 3.0 3.4
4: Excellent (%) 13.3 14.3 33.3 71.4
3: Good (%) 60.0 50.0 33.3 14.3
2: Fair (%) 6.7 14.3 33.3 .
1: Poor (%) 20.0 21.4 . 14.3
Total (N) 15 14 9 7

C3e: Univ admin support academic freedom Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.2 2.7 3.3 3.4
4: Excellent (%) 35.0 16.7 37.5 42.9
3: Good (%) 50.0 50.0 50.0 57.1
2: Fair (%) 10.0 16.7 12.5 .
1: Poor (%) 5.0 16.7 . .
Total (N) 20 18 8 7

C3f: Univ admin make rational decisions Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.3 2.4 3.0 2.9
4: Excellent (%) . 7.1 25.0 14.3
3: Good (%) 55.6 42.9 50.0 71.4
2: Fair (%) 16.7 28.6 25.0 .
1: Poor (%) 27.8 21.4 . 14.3
Total (N) 18 14 8 7

C3g: Univ admin make equitable decisions Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.2 2.1 3.1 2.6
4: Excellent (%) . . 28.6 .
3: Good (%) 53.3 38.5 57.1 71.4
2: Fair (%) 13.3 30.8 14.3 14.3
1: Poor (%) 33.3 30.8 . 14.3
Total (N) 15 13 7 7

C3h: Univ admin promote diversity within university Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.0 3.0 3.1 3.3
4: Excellent (%) 23.8 33.3 50.0 42.9
3: Good (%) 52.4 44.4 25.0 42.9
2: Fair (%) 19.0 11.1 12.5 14.3
1: Poor (%) 4.8 11.1 12.5 .
Total (N) 21 18 8 7
Back to Top

Section D: Faculty-Administration Relationships

D1a: I am encouraged to give input on curricular issues Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.5 3.5 3.9 3.5
4: Strongly agree (%) 57.1 54.5 88.9 62.5
3: Agree (%) 38.1 40.9 11.1 25.0
2: Disagree (%) . 4.5 . 12.5
1: Strongly disagree (%) 4.8 . . .
Total (N) 21 22 9 8

D1b: I am encouraged to give input on prog assessment Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.3 3.5 3.6 3.6
4: Strongly agree (%) 42.9 45.5 55.6 62.5
3: Agree (%) 47.6 54.5 44.4 37.5
2: Disagree (%) 9.5 . . .
Total (N) 21 22 9 8

D1c: I am encouraged to give input on dept hiring Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.2 3.5 3.9 3.3
4: Strongly agree (%) 42.9 52.4 88.9 37.5
3: Agree (%) 42.9 42.9 11.1 50.0
2: Disagree (%) 4.8 4.8 . 12.5
1: Strongly disagree (%) 9.5 . . .
Total (N) 21 21 9 8

D1d: I am encouraged to give input on college admin appointments Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.4 3.0 3.3 3.1
4: Strongly agree (%) . 18.2 44.4 14.3
3: Agree (%) 52.4 59.1 44.4 85.7
2: Disagree (%) 33.3 22.7 11.1 .
1: Strongly disagree (%) 14.3 . . .
Total (N) 21 22 9 7

D1e: I am encouraged to give input on university admin appointments Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.0 2.9 2.8 3.0
4: Strongly agree (%) . 18.2 11.1 12.5
3: Agree (%) 28.6 54.5 55.6 75.0
2: Disagree (%) 47.6 22.7 33.3 12.5
1: Strongly disagree (%) 23.8 4.5 . .
Total (N) 21 22 9 8

D2: Familiarity with academic program assessment in dept Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.1 2.9 3.4 2.9
4: Very familiar (%) 23.8 27.3 37.5 22.2
3: Somewhat familiar (%) 61.9 45.5 62.5 44.4
2: Not very familiar (%) 14.3 18.2 . 33.3
1: Not at all familiar (%) . 9.1 . .
Total (N) 21 22 8 9

D3a: Understanding of resource allocation to university Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.3 2.0 2.2 1.8
4: Very well (%) 9.5 . . .
3: Fairly well (%) 23.8 22.7 22.2 11.1
2: Not very well (%) 52.4 59.1 77.8 55.6
1: Not at all (%) 14.3 18.2 . 33.3
Total (N) 21 22 9 9

D3b: Understanding of resource allocation to college Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.1 2.1 2.3 2.2
3: Fairly well (%) 33.3 31.8 33.3 33.3
2: Not very well (%) 47.6 50.0 66.7 55.6
1: Not at all (%) 19.0 18.2 . 11.1
Total (N) 21 22 9 9

D3c: Understanding of resource allocation to department Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.3 2.5 2.8 2.7
4: Very well (%) 4.8 9.1 11.1 11.1
3: Fairly well (%) 42.9 45.5 55.6 44.4
2: Not very well (%) 33.3 31.8 33.3 44.4
1: Not at all (%) 19.0 13.6 . .
Total (N) 21 22 9 9

D3d: Understanding of resource allocation within department Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.9 2.9 3.0 2.7
4: Very well (%) 38.1 22.7 11.1 22.2
3: Fairly well (%) 23.8 54.5 77.8 33.3
2: Not very well (%) 23.8 9.1 11.1 33.3
1: Not at all (%) 14.3 13.6 . 11.1
Total (N) 21 22 9 9

D4: Faculty have sufficient input on dept resource allocation Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.6 2.8 3.1 2.8
4: Strongly agree (%) 9.5 9.1 22.2 12.5
3: Agree (%) 52.4 63.6 66.7 50.0
2: Disagree (%) 28.6 22.7 11.1 37.5
1: Strongly disagree (%) 9.5 4.5 . .
Total (N) 21 22 9 8

D5: Dept faculty searches/appointments are collegial and inclusive Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.5 3.6 3.6 3.5
4: Strongly agree (%) 61.9 63.6 66.7 62.5
3: Agree (%) 33.3 31.8 22.2 25.0
2: Disagree (%) . 4.5 11.1 12.5
1: Strongly disagree (%) 4.8 . . .
Total (N) 21 22 9 8

D6a: Relations between faculty in dept and dept admin Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.2 3.2 3.8 3.0
4: Excellent (%) 42.9 45.5 77.8 25.0
3: Good (%) 38.1 36.4 22.2 50.0
2: Fair (%) 14.3 13.6 . 25.0
1: Poor (%) 4.8 4.5 . .
Total (N) 21 22 9 8

D6b: Relations between faculty in dept and college admin Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.8 3.0 3.6 2.8
4: Excellent (%) 25.0 25.0 75.0 .
3: Good (%) 40.0 45.0 12.5 75.0
2: Fair (%) 25.0 30.0 12.5 25.0
1: Poor (%) 10.0 . . .
Total (N) 20 20 8 8

D6c: Relations between faculty in dept and univ admin Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.4 2.8 3.3 3.0
4: Excellent (%) 6.3 23.5 25.0 20.0
3: Good (%) 43.8 41.2 75.0 60.0
2: Fair (%) 31.3 23.5 . 20.0
1: Poor (%) 18.8 11.8 . .
Total (N) 16 17 8 5

D6d: Relations between all faculty and univ admin Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.4 2.4 3.1 2.0
4: Excellent (%) 5.6 5.3 25.0 .
3: Good (%) 33.3 52.6 62.5 20.0
2: Fair (%) 55.6 21.1 12.5 60.0
1: Poor (%) 5.6 21.1 . 20.0
Total (N) 18 19 8 5

D7a: Faculty Senate effective commun between faculty and univ admin Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.0 2.8 2.8 3.0
4: Strongly agree (%) . 17.6 . 28.6
3: Agree (%) 33.3 52.9 83.3 57.1
2: Disagree (%) 33.3 23.5 16.7 .
1: Strongly disagree (%) 33.3 5.9 . 14.3
Total (N) 18 17 6 7

D7b: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty in general Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.1 2.8 2.8 2.9
4: Strongly agree (%) 6.7 18.8 . 14.3
3: Agree (%) 26.7 50.0 83.3 71.4
2: Disagree (%) 33.3 25.0 16.7 .
1: Strongly disagree (%) 33.3 6.3 . 14.3
Total (N) 15 16 6 7

D7c: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty like me Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 1.9 2.7 2.7 2.4
4: Strongly agree (%) . 20.0 . .
3: Agree (%) 20.0 33.3 66.7 60.0
2: Disagree (%) 46.7 40.0 33.3 20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%) 33.3 6.7 . 20.0
Total (N) 15 15 6 5

D8: Effectiveness of university grievance procedures Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.1 3.2 2.5 2.7
4: Very effective (%) 25.0 36.4 . .
3: Somewhat effective (%) 62.5 45.5 50.0 66.7
2: Not very effective (%) 12.5 18.2 50.0 33.3
Total (N) 8 11 2 3

D9: Importance of "ombuds" for informal conflict resolution Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.2 3.4 3.5 3.6
4: Very important (%) 47.6 45.5 50.0 62.5
3: Somewhat important (%) 33.3 50.0 50.0 37.5
2: Not very important (%) 14.3 4.5 . .
1: Not at all important (%) 4.8 . . .
Total (N) 21 22 8 8
Back to Top

Section E: Diversity/Multiculturalism

E1: Importance of institutional emphasis on diversity/Multiculturalism Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.1 3.4 3.5 3.4
4: Very important (%) 38.1 45.5 62.5 71.4
3: Somewhat important (%) 42.9 45.5 25.0 14.3
2: Not very important (%) 14.3 9.1 12.5 .
1: Not at all important (%) 4.8 . . 14.3
Total (N) 21 22 8 7

E2: Importance of diversity to enhanced learning in own classroom Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.7 3.0 3.1 3.3
4: Very important (%) 25.0 33.3 42.9 66.7
3: Somewhat important (%) 25.0 38.9 28.6 16.7
2: Not very important (%) 40.0 22.2 28.6 .
1: Not at all important (%) 10.0 5.6 . 16.7
Total (N) 20 18 7 6

E3: NCSU prepares students to live and work in diverse society Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.9 2.7 3.0 2.7
4: Strongly agree (%) 9.5 5.3 14.3 .
3: Agree (%) 71.4 68.4 71.4 66.7
2: Disagree (%) 14.3 21.1 14.3 33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%) 4.8 5.3 . .
Total (N) 21 19 7 6

E4a: My dept recruits historically underrepresented students Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.2 3.1 3.4 3.0
4: Strongly agree (%) 36.8 23.8 42.9 20.0
3: Agree (%) 47.4 66.7 57.1 60.0
2: Disagree (%) 10.5 4.8 . 20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%) 5.3 4.8 . .
Total (N) 19 21 7 5

E4b: My dept retains historically underrepresented students Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.3
4: Strongly agree (%) 27.8 21.1 14.3 33.3
3: Agree (%) 61.1 63.2 85.7 66.7
2: Disagree (%) 5.6 15.8 . .
1: Strongly disagree (%) 5.6 . . .
Total (N) 18 19 7 3

E4c: My dept supports historically underrepresented students Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.2 3.3 3.3 3.0
4: Strongly agree (%) 35.3 33.3 37.5 33.3
3: Agree (%) 58.8 61.1 50.0 33.3
2: Disagree (%) . 5.6 12.5 33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%) 5.9 . . .
Total (N) 17 18 8 3

E4d: My dept recruits historically underrepresented faculty Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.1 3.1 3.4 3.0
4: Strongly agree (%) 19.0 28.6 42.9 25.0
3: Agree (%) 76.2 57.1 57.1 50.0
2: Disagree (%) . 14.3 . 25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%) 4.8 . . .
Total (N) 21 21 7 4

E4e: My dept retains historically underrepresented faculty Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.1 3.1 3.4 3.3
4: Strongly agree (%) 22.2 27.8 42.9 25.0
3: Agree (%) 72.2 61.1 57.1 75.0
2: Disagree (%) . 5.6 . .
1: Strongly disagree (%) 5.6 5.6 . .
Total (N) 18 18 7 4

E4f: My dept supports historically underrepresented faculty Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.1 3.2 3.4 3.0
4: Strongly agree (%) 22.2 29.4 42.9 25.0
3: Agree (%) 72.2 64.7 57.1 50.0
2: Disagree (%) . . . 25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%) 5.6 5.9 . .
Total (N) 18 17 7 4

E5a: Dept environ accepting/respectful of age Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.3 3.5 3.8 3.7
4: Strongly agree (%) 42.9 54.5 87.5 66.7
3: Agree (%) 47.6 40.9 . 33.3
2: Disagree (%) 4.8 4.5 12.5 .
1: Strongly disagree (%) 4.8 . . .
Total (N) 21 22 8 6

E5b: Dept environ accepting/respectful of disability status Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.4 3.6 4.0 3.8
4: Strongly agree (%) 43.8 60.0 100.0 75.0
3: Agree (%) 50.0 40.0 . 25.0
2: Disagree (%) 6.3 . . .
Total (N) 16 20 5 4

E5c: Dept environ accepting/respectful of gender Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.3 3.5 3.9 3.5
4: Strongly agree (%) 38.1 57.1 87.5 66.7
3: Agree (%) 57.1 38.1 12.5 16.7
2: Disagree (%) . . . 16.7
1: Strongly disagree (%) 4.8 4.8 . .
Total (N) 21 21 8 6

E5d: Dept environ accepting/respectful of military status Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.1 3.5 4.0 3.7
4: Strongly agree (%) 35.3 50.0 100.0 66.7
3: Agree (%) 47.1 50.0 . 33.3
2: Disagree (%) 11.8 . . .
1: Strongly disagree (%) 5.9 . . .
Total (N) 17 16 7 3

E5e: Dept environ accepting/respectful of nationality/ethnic origin Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.4 3.6 3.9 3.5
4: Strongly agree (%) 52.4 61.9 87.5 50.0
3: Agree (%) 42.9 38.1 12.5 50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%) 4.8 . . .
Total (N) 21 21 8 4

E5f: Dept environ accepting/respectful of race and color Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.3 3.5 3.9 3.2
4: Strongly agree (%) 42.9 59.1 87.5 33.3
3: Agree (%) 52.4 36.4 12.5 50.0
2: Disagree (%) . . . 16.7
1: Strongly disagree (%) 4.8 4.5 . .
Total (N) 21 22 8 6

E5g: Dept environ accepting/respectful of religion Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.4 3.5 3.9 3.5
4: Strongly agree (%) 44.4 52.6 85.7 50.0
3: Agree (%) 55.6 47.4 14.3 50.0
Total (N) 18 19 7 4

E5h: Dept environ accepting/respectful of sexual orientation Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.2 3.3 3.9 3.7
4: Strongly agree (%) 28.6 52.6 85.7 66.7
3: Agree (%) 64.3 36.8 14.3 33.3
2: Disagree (%) 7.1 . . .
1: Strongly disagree (%) . 10.5 . .
Total (N) 14 19 7 3

E6a: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of age Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.5 3.6 3.8 3.4
4: Strongly agree (%) 55.0 55.0 87.5 57.1
3: Agree (%) 40.0 45.0 . 28.6
2: Disagree (%) . . 12.5 14.3
1: Strongly disagree (%) 5.0 . . .
Total (N) 20 20 8 7

E6b: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of disability status Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.5 3.6 4.0 3.4
4: Strongly agree (%) 55.0 57.9 100.0 60.0
3: Agree (%) 40.0 42.1 . 20.0
2: Disagree (%) . . . 20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%) 5.0 . . .
Total (N) 20 19 5 5

E6c: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of gender Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.5 3.6 3.9 3.6
4: Strongly agree (%) 55.0 60.0 87.5 57.1
3: Agree (%) 40.0 40.0 12.5 42.9
1: Strongly disagree (%) 5.0 . . .
Total (N) 20 20 8 7

E6d: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of military status Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.6 3.6 3.7 3.5
4: Strongly agree (%) 55.6 60.0 85.7 50.0
3: Agree (%) 44.4 40.0 . 50.0
2: Disagree (%) . . 14.3 .
Total (N) 18 15 7 4

E6e: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of national/ethnic origin Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.5 3.6 3.9 3.6
4: Strongly agree (%) 55.0 55.0 87.5 60.0
3: Agree (%) 40.0 45.0 12.5 40.0
1: Strongly disagree (%) 5.0 . . .
Total (N) 20 20 8 5

E6f: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of race and color Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.5 3.6 3.9 3.3
4: Strongly agree (%) 55.0 57.9 87.5 33.3
3: Agree (%) 40.0 42.1 12.5 66.7
1: Strongly disagree (%) 5.0 . . .
Total (N) 20 19 8 6

E6g: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of religion Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.6 3.5 3.8 3.6
4: Strongly agree (%) 56.3 47.1 75.0 60.0
3: Agree (%) 43.8 52.9 25.0 40.0
Total (N) 16 17 8 5

E6h: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of sexual orientation Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.4 3.3 3.9 3.5
4: Strongly agree (%) 50.0 50.0 87.5 50.0
3: Agree (%) 35.7 38.9 12.5 50.0
2: Disagree (%) 14.3 . . .
1: Strongly disagree (%) . 11.1 . .
Total (N) 14 18 8 4

E7: Faculty diversity/multiculturalism enhancement of intellectual diversity in dept Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.7 2.9 3.1 3.4
4: A great deal (%) 14.3 33.3 25.0 42.9
3: Some (%) 57.1 28.6 62.5 57.1
2: A little (%) 14.3 33.3 12.5 .
1: Not at all (%) 14.3 4.8 . .
Total (N) 21 21 8 7

E8: Inclusion of diversity-related topics, scholarship, etc in your courses Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 1.9 2.4 2.0 2.5
4: A great deal (%) 11.1 11.8 16.7 25.0
3: Some (%) 11.1 41.2 16.7 25.0
2: A little (%) 33.3 23.5 16.7 25.0
1: Not at all (%) 44.4 23.5 50.0 25.0
Total (N) 18 17 6 4

E9a: Interest in research, extension, art endeavors outside U.S. Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.5 3.1 3.8 3.0
4: A great deal (%) 61.9 40.9 75.0 57.1
3: Some (%) 28.6 40.9 25.0 .
2: A little (%) 4.8 9.1 . 28.6
1: None (%) 4.8 9.1 . 14.3
Total (N) 21 22 8 7

E9b: Interest in teaching study abroad Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.0 2.5 3.4 2.5
4: A great deal (%) 38.1 27.3 50.0 33.3
3: Some (%) 38.1 27.3 37.5 16.7
2: A little (%) 9.5 9.1 12.5 16.7
1: None (%) 14.3 36.4 . 33.3
Total (N) 21 22 8 6

E9c: Interest in participating in spring break service learning Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.0 1.9 2.8 2.3
4: A great deal (%) 14.3 4.5 37.5 .
3: Some (%) 19.0 27.3 12.5 50.0
2: A little (%) 14.3 22.7 37.5 33.3
1: None (%) 52.4 45.5 12.5 16.7
Total (N) 21 22 8 6

E9d: Interest in participating in international service projects Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.5 2.5 3.0 2.4
4: A great deal (%) 19.0 31.8 50.0 14.3
3: Some (%) 38.1 18.2 12.5 28.6
2: A little (%) 14.3 22.7 25.0 42.9
1: None (%) 28.6 27.3 12.5 14.3
Total (N) 21 22 8 7

E9e: Interest in teaching in international studies major Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 1.9 2.2 2.6 2.0
4: A great deal (%) 9.5 22.7 37.5 16.7
3: Some (%) 23.8 13.6 12.5 16.7
2: A little (%) 14.3 22.7 25.0 16.7
1: None (%) 52.4 40.9 25.0 50.0
Total (N) 21 22 8 6

E9f: Interest in advising international students Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.1 2.6 3.5 3.0
4: A great deal (%) 28.6 27.3 50.0 28.6
3: Some (%) 57.1 27.3 50.0 57.1
2: A little (%) 9.5 22.7 . .
1: None (%) 4.8 22.7 . 14.3
Total (N) 21 22 8 7
Back to Top

Section F: Working Relationships

F1: There is unity/cohesion among faculty in my department Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.1 2.9 3.4 2.8
4: Strongly agree (%) 42.9 23.8 62.5 .
3: Agree (%) 28.6 47.6 12.5 83.3
2: Disagree (%) 23.8 19.0 25.0 16.7
1: Strongly disagree (%) 4.8 9.5 . .
Total (N) 21 21 8 6

F2a: Good communication between my students and me Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.4 3.5 3.8 3.6
4: Strongly agree (%) 40.0 47.4 75.0 60.0
3: Agree (%) 60.0 52.6 25.0 40.0
Total (N) 20 19 8 5

F2b: Good communication between dept and our students Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.2 3.3 3.5 3.0
4: Strongly agree (%) 26.3 37.5 50.0 16.7
3: Agree (%) 63.2 56.3 50.0 66.7
2: Disagree (%) 10.5 6.3 . 16.7
Total (N) 19 16 8 6

F2c: Good communication between faculty in my dept Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.9 3.0 3.4 3.0
4: Strongly agree (%) 19.0 23.8 50.0 16.7
3: Agree (%) 57.1 61.9 37.5 66.7
2: Disagree (%) 19.0 9.5 12.5 16.7
1: Strongly disagree (%) 4.8 4.8 . .
Total (N) 21 21 8 6

F2d: Good communication between my dept and other depts Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.6 2.5 3.0 2.7
4: Strongly agree (%) 10.5 5.6 12.5 16.7
3: Agree (%) 42.1 55.6 75.0 33.3
2: Disagree (%) 42.1 22.2 12.5 50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%) 5.3 16.7 . .
Total (N) 19 18 8 6

F2e: Good communication between my college and other colleges Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.5 2.7 2.9 3.0
4: Strongly agree (%) 6.3 14.3 . 25.0
3: Agree (%) 43.8 57.1 85.7 50.0
2: Disagree (%) 43.8 14.3 14.3 25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%) 6.3 14.3 . .
Total (N) 16 14 7 4

F3: Dept environ promotes respectful dialogue between diverse perspectives Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.1 3.3 3.6 3.0
4: Strongly agree (%) 38.1 38.1 62.5 16.7
3: Agree (%) 38.1 57.1 37.5 66.7
2: Disagree (%) 19.0 . . 16.7
1: Strongly disagree (%) 4.8 4.8 . .
Total (N) 21 21 8 6

F4a: Frequency given/recvd teaching advice in dept past few years Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.9 2.7 3.0 2.0
Frequently (%) 23.8 23.8 37.5 16.7
Sometimes (%) 57.1 42.9 37.5 16.7
Seldom (%) 4.8 9.5 12.5 16.7
Never (%) 14.3 23.8 12.5 50.0
Total (N) 21 21 8 6

F4b: Frequency given/recvd research/artistic feedback in dept past few yrs Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.0 3.2 3.6 3.3
Frequently (%) 42.9 33.3 75.0 33.3
Sometimes (%) 33.3 61.9 12.5 66.7
Seldom (%) . . 12.5 .
Never (%) 23.8 4.8 . .
Total (N) 21 21 8 6

F4c: Frequency given/recvd help with dept/college bureaucracy past few yrs Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.9 2.9 3.5 3.0
Frequently (%) 38.1 23.8 62.5 50.0
Sometimes (%) 33.3 52.4 25.0 16.7
Seldom (%) 4.8 14.3 12.5 16.7
Never (%) 23.8 9.5 . 16.7
Total (N) 21 21 8 6

F4d: Frequency given/recvd help undrsnd reappointment, promotion, tenure past few yrs Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.1 3.0 3.6 2.8
Frequently (%) 42.9 14.3 75.0 33.3
Sometimes (%) 42.9 66.7 12.5 33.3
Seldom (%) . 19.0 12.5 16.7
Never (%) 14.3 . . 16.7
Total (N) 21 21 8 6

F4e: Frequency given/recvd help with work/personal balance issues past few yrs Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.1 2.5 2.5 2.0
Frequently (%) 9.5 9.5 25.0 .
Sometimes (%) 33.3 47.6 12.5 33.3
Seldom (%) 19.0 28.6 50.0 33.3
Never (%) 38.1 14.3 12.5 33.3
Total (N) 21 21 8 6

F5a: Frequency of collab with faculty in your dept Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.8 3.7 3.8 3.3
Frequently (%) 85.7 71.4 87.5 50.0
Sometimes (%) 9.5 23.8 . 33.3
Seldom (%) . 4.8 12.5 16.7
Never (%) 4.8 . . .
Total (N) 21 21 8 6

F5b: Frequency of collab with faculty in other NCSU depts Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.5
Frequently (%) 38.1 23.8 50.0 50.0
Sometimes (%) 38.1 57.1 12.5 50.0
Seldom (%) 14.3 19.0 25.0 .
Never (%) 9.5 . 12.5 .
Total (N) 21 21 8 6

F5c: Frequency of collab with faculty from other universities Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.1 3.1 3.4 3.0
Frequently (%) 47.6 28.6 50.0 20.0
Sometimes (%) 28.6 57.1 37.5 60.0
Seldom (%) 14.3 14.3 12.5 20.0
Never (%) 9.5 . . .
Total (N) 21 21 8 5

F5d: Frequency of collab with non-faculty external to NCSU Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.3 3.3 3.1 3.5
Frequently (%) 57.1 50.0 37.5 50.0
Sometimes (%) 23.8 30.0 50.0 50.0
Seldom (%) 9.5 15.0 . .
Never (%) 9.5 5.0 12.5 .
Total (N) 21 20 8 6
Back to Top

Section G: Faculty Support & Professional Development

G1a: Satisfaction with level of courses Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.2 2.9 3.6 3.5
4: Very Satisfied (%) 41.2 25.0 57.1 50.0
3: Satisfied (%) 41.2 56.3 42.9 50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%) 11.8 6.3 . .
1: Very dissatisfied (%) 5.9 12.5 . .
Total (N) 17 16 7 4

G1b: Satisfaction with number of courses Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.1 3.0 3.1 3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%) 29.4 25.0 14.3 25.0
3: Satisfied (%) 52.9 56.3 85.7 75.0
2: Dissatisfied (%) 17.6 12.5 . .
1: Very dissatisfied (%) . 6.3 . .
Total (N) 17 16 7 4

G1c: Satisfaction with choice in courses Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.3 3.3 3.7 3.5
4: Very Satisfied (%) 52.9 50.0 71.4 50.0
3: Satisfied (%) 29.4 31.3 28.6 50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%) 11.8 12.5 . .
1: Very dissatisfied (%) 5.9 6.3 . .
Total (N) 17 16 7 4

G1d: Satisfaction with course content discretion Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.6 3.7 3.9 3.8
4: Very Satisfied (%) 76.5 68.8 85.7 75.0
3: Satisfied (%) 17.6 31.3 14.3 25.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%) 5.9 . . .
Total (N) 17 16 7 4

G1e: Satisfaction with number of students Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.1 3.3 3.3 3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%) 52.9 43.8 42.9 25.0
3: Satisfied (%) 17.6 37.5 42.9 50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%) 17.6 18.8 14.3 25.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%) 11.8 . . .
Total (N) 17 16 7 4

G1f: Satisfaction with quality of undergraduates Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.7 2.6 3.1 2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%) 6.3 5.6 28.6 .
3: Satisfied (%) 62.5 61.1 57.1 60.0
2: Dissatisfied (%) 25.0 16.7 14.3 40.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%) 6.3 16.7 . .
Total (N) 16 18 7 5

G1g: Satisfaction with quality of graduate students Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.9 3.1 3.3 2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%) 30.0 28.6 42.9 .
3: Satisfied (%) 45.0 61.9 42.9 80.0
2: Dissatisfied (%) 10.0 4.8 14.3 20.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%) 15.0 4.8 . .
Total (N) 20 21 7 5

G1h: Satisfaction with access to grad TAs Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.4 2.8 3.3 3.5
4: Very Satisfied (%) 12.5 11.8 57.1 50.0
3: Satisfied (%) 37.5 64.7 14.3 50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%) 31.3 11.8 28.6 .
1: Very dissatisfied (%) 18.8 11.8 . .
Total (N) 16 17 7 2

G1i: Satisfaction with access to grad RAs Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.8 2.6 3.3 2.0
4: Very Satisfied (%) 21.1 5.6 57.1 .
3: Satisfied (%) 52.6 55.6 14.3 .
2: Dissatisfied (%) 10.5 27.8 28.6 100.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%) 15.8 11.1 . .
Total (N) 19 18 7 1

G2a: NCSU supports innovative teaching Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.4 3.2 3.5 3.2
4: Strongly agree (%) 52.6 36.8 50.0 20.0
3: Agree (%) 42.1 47.4 50.0 80.0
2: Disagree (%) . 15.8 . .
1: Strongly disagree (%) 5.3 . . .
Total (N) 19 19 8 5

G2b: NCSU supports innovative research and scholarly activity Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.2 3.2 3.3 3.2
4: Strongly agree (%) 42.1 28.6 37.5 20.0
3: Agree (%) 42.1 66.7 50.0 80.0
2: Disagree (%) 5.3 . 12.5 .
1: Strongly disagree (%) 10.5 4.8 . .
Total (N) 19 21 8 5

G2c: NCSU supports innovative creative artistry and literature Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.5 2.9 3.0 3.0
4: Strongly agree (%) . . . 25.0
3: Agree (%) 50.0 85.7 100.0 50.0
2: Disagree (%) 50.0 14.3 . 25.0
Total (N) 4 7 4 4

G2d: NCSU supports innovative extension/engagement/econ dev activity Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.0 3.1 3.3 3.4
4: Strongly agree (%) 33.3 37.5 33.3 60.0
3: Agree (%) 46.7 37.5 66.7 20.0
2: Disagree (%) 6.7 25.0 . 20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%) 13.3 . . .
Total (N) 15 16 6 5

G3a: NCSU rewards innovative teaching Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.7 2.5 2.5 2.7
4: Strongly agree (%) 16.7 5.3 . .
3: Agree (%) 44.4 52.6 62.5 66.7
2: Disagree (%) 27.8 26.3 25.0 33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%) 11.1 15.8 12.5 .
Total (N) 18 19 8 3

G3b: NCSU rewards innovative research and scholarly activity Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.0 3.4 3.1 2.6
4: Strongly agree (%) 38.9 50.0 12.5 .
3: Agree (%) 38.9 40.0 87.5 60.0
2: Disagree (%) 5.6 5.0 . 40.0
1: Strongly disagree (%) 16.7 5.0 . .
Total (N) 18 20 8 5

G3c: NCSU rewards innovative creative artistry and literature Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.3 2.6 3.0 2.7
3: Agree (%) 50.0 60.0 100.0 66.7
2: Disagree (%) 25.0 40.0 . 33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%) 25.0 . . .
Total (N) 4 5 3 3

G3d: NCSU rewards innovative extension/engagement/econ dev activity Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.3 2.3 3.2 3.0
4: Strongly agree (%) 6.7 6.3 16.7 20.0
3: Agree (%) 46.7 37.5 83.3 60.0
2: Disagree (%) 20.0 37.5 . 20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%) 26.7 18.8 . .
Total (N) 15 16 6 5

G4a: Satisfaction: Availability of classroom technology Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.1 3.1 3.4 3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%) 31.3 26.7 50.0 25.0
3: Satisfied (%) 56.3 60.0 37.5 50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%) . 13.3 12.5 25.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%) 12.5 . . .
Total (N) 16 15 8 4

G4b: Satisfaction: Teaching reduction for scholarly/prof growth Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.7 2.8 3.0 2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%) 25.0 23.1 16.7 .
3: Satisfied (%) 41.7 46.2 66.7 50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%) 8.3 23.1 16.7 50.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%) 25.0 7.7 . .
Total (N) 12 13 6 4

G4c: Satisfaction: Teaching workshop/seminar opportunities Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.2 3.4 3.1 3.5
4: Very Satisfied (%) 27.8 40.0 25.0 50.0
3: Satisfied (%) 66.7 60.0 62.5 50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%) 5.6 . 12.5 .
Total (N) 18 15 8 4

G4d: Satisfaction: Avail of funds to attend teaching conference/wrkshp Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.4 2.7 2.8 2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%) 7.1 16.7 16.7 25.0
3: Satisfied (%) 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%) 14.3 16.7 33.3 .
1: Very dissatisfied (%) 28.6 16.7 . 25.0
Total (N) 14 12 6 4

G4e: Satisfaction: Learning technology training/support Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.1 3.0 3.0 3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%) 17.6 18.8 12.5 50.0
3: Satisfied (%) 76.5 62.5 75.0 25.0
2: Dissatisfied (%) 5.9 18.8 12.5 25.0
Total (N) 17 16 8 4

G4f: Satisfaction: Campus bookstore meeting course needs Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.0 2.9 3.0 3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%) 6.3 7.7 20.0 .
3: Satisfied (%) 87.5 84.6 60.0 100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%) 6.3 . 20.0 .
1: Very dissatisfied (%) . 7.7 . .
Total (N) 16 13 5 3

G4g: Satisfaction: Availability of funds to present work Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.5 2.8 2.5 2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%) 5.0 5.6 . .
3: Satisfied (%) 50.0 77.8 62.5 50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%) 35.0 5.6 25.0 50.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%) 10.0 11.1 12.5 .
Total (N) 20 18 8 4

G4h: Satisfaction: Opportunities for scholarly/professional leave Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.7 2.4 3.0 2.0
4: Very Satisfied (%) . 11.1 40.0 .
3: Satisfied (%) 77.8 33.3 40.0 .
2: Dissatisfied (%) 11.1 38.9 . 100.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%) 11.1 16.7 20.0 .
Total (N) 18 18 5 2

G4i: Satisfaction: Financial support for scholarly/professional leave Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.4 2.3 2.6 2.0
4: Very Satisfied (%) . 13.3 . .
3: Satisfied (%) 61.1 20.0 80.0 .
2: Dissatisfied (%) 22.2 46.7 . 100.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%) 16.7 20.0 20.0 .
Total (N) 18 15 5 3

G4j: Satisfaction: Leadership development opportunities Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.5 2.8 2.6 2.4
4: Very Satisfied (%) . 12.5 . .
3: Satisfied (%) 68.8 56.3 80.0 60.0
2: Dissatisfied (%) 12.5 25.0 . 20.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%) 18.8 6.3 20.0 20.0
Total (N) 16 16 5 5

G4k: Satisfaction: Support for dept assessment activities Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.4 2.5 2.9 2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%) . 6.3 . .
3: Satisfied (%) 64.7 56.3 85.7 60.0
2: Dissatisfied (%) 11.8 18.8 14.3 40.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%) 23.5 18.8 . .
Total (N) 17 16 7 5

G4l: Satisfaction: Availability of/access to materials via NCSU Libraries Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.5 3.3 3.1 3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%) 52.4 30.0 25.0 33.3
3: Satisfied (%) 47.6 65.0 62.5 66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%) . 5.0 12.5 .
Total (N) 21 20 8 6

G4m: Satisfaction: Support with dealing with student concerns Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.9 3.1 3.2 3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%) 11.1 20.0 20.0 25.0
3: Satisfied (%) 72.2 66.7 80.0 75.0
2: Dissatisfied (%) 16.7 13.3 . .
Total (N) 18 15 5 4

G4n: Satisfaction: Support for technology transfer Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.3 2.6 2.7 3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%) . 5.9 14.3 .
3: Satisfied (%) 53.3 58.8 57.1 100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%) 20.0 29.4 14.3 .
1: Very dissatisfied (%) 26.7 5.9 14.3 .
Total (N) 15 17 7 4

G5: Assignment of formal mentor Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Yes (%) . 9.5 50.0 .
No (%) 95.2 85.7 37.5 100.0
Don't know (%) 4.8 4.8 12.5 .
Total (N) 21 21 8 6

G6: Mentor helpfulness Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Mean Rating 3.5 3.5
4: Very helpful (%) 50.0 75.0
3: Somewhat helpful (%) 50.0 .
2: Not very helpful (%) . 25.0
Total (N) 2 4

G7a: Satisfaction: Pre-award support from college for grant/contract Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.7 2.8 3.3 2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%) 26.3 16.7 50.0 .
3: Satisfied (%) 36.8 55.6 25.0 66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%) 21.1 22.2 25.0 33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%) 15.8 5.6 . .
Total (N) 19 18 8 3

G7b: Satisfaction: Post-award support from college for grant/contract Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.5 2.7 3.1 2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%) 22.2 5.6 25.0 .
3: Satisfied (%) 33.3 72.2 62.5 66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%) 16.7 5.6 12.5 33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%) 27.8 16.7 . .
Total (N) 18 18 8 3

G7c: Satisfaction: Pre-award University support for grant/contract Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.8 2.6 3.3 3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%) 16.7 11.8 42.9 .
3: Satisfied (%) 55.6 52.9 42.9 100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%) 16.7 23.5 14.3 .
1: Very dissatisfied (%) 11.1 11.8 . .
Total (N) 18 17 7 1

G7d: Satisfaction: Post-award University support for grant/contract Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.5 2.6 3.1 3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%) 6.3 12.5 28.6 .
3: Satisfied (%) 50.0 50.0 57.1 100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%) 31.3 18.8 14.3 .
1: Very dissatisfied (%) 12.5 18.8 . .
Total (N) 16 16 7 1

G7e: Satisfaction: Allocation of indirect grant costs to investigator Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.3 1.7 2.7 1.5
4: Very Satisfied (%) . . 14.3 .
3: Satisfied (%) 52.9 13.3 57.1 .
2: Dissatisfied (%) 23.5 40.0 14.3 50.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%) 23.5 46.7 14.3 50.0
Total (N) 17 15 7 2

G7f: Satisfaction: Allocation of indirect grant costs to department Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.1 1.9 2.7 1.5
4: Very Satisfied (%) . . 14.3 .
3: Satisfied (%) 35.3 20.0 57.1 .
2: Dissatisfied (%) 41.2 50.0 14.3 50.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%) 23.5 30.0 14.3 50.0
Total (N) 17 10 7 2

G7g: Satisfaction: PI control over indirect cost allocation Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.1 1.6 2.3 2.0
4: Very Satisfied (%) 5.9 . . .
3: Satisfied (%) 29.4 15.4 37.5 50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%) 35.3 30.8 50.0 .
1: Very dissatisfied (%) 29.4 53.8 12.5 50.0
Total (N) 17 13 8 2
Back to Top

Section H: Performance Review, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure

H1: Faculty performance review standards are clearly stated Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.9 3.1 3.0 2.8
4: Strongly agree (%) 30.0 25.0 25.0 16.7
3: Agree (%) 35.0 60.0 62.5 50.0
2: Disagree (%) 30.0 10.0 . 33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%) 5.0 5.0 12.5 .
Total (N) 20 20 8 6

H2: Faculty performance review procedures are clearly stated Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.4 3.2 3.3 2.8
4: Strongly agree (%) 52.6 30.0 42.9 16.7
3: Agree (%) 36.8 60.0 42.9 50.0
2: Disagree (%) 5.3 5.0 14.3 33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%) 5.3 5.0 . .
Total (N) 19 20 7 6

H3: SME is consistent with departmental vision Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.2 3.1 3.4 3.3
4: Strongly agree (%) 44.4 31.6 37.5 50.0
3: Agree (%) 44.4 52.6 62.5 33.3
2: Disagree (%) . 10.5 . 16.7
1: Strongly disagree (%) 11.1 5.3 . .
Total (N) 18 19 8 6

H4: SME is consistent with departmental promotion standards Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.3 3.2 3.4 3.5
4: Strongly agree (%) 47.1 31.3 37.5 50.0
3: Agree (%) 41.2 56.3 62.5 50.0
2: Disagree (%) 5.9 12.5 . .
1: Strongly disagree (%) 5.9 . . .
Total (N) 17 16 8 4

H5a: Performance Review feedback appropriately based on SME Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.3 3.1 3.3 3.5
4: Strongly agree (%) 38.9 31.6 28.6 50.0
3: Agree (%) 55.6 52.6 71.4 50.0
2: Disagree (%) . 5.3 . .
1: Strongly disagree (%) 5.6 10.5 . .
Total (N) 18 19 7 6

H5b: Performance Review feedback helpful for professional Development Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.8 3.0 3.3 3.0
4: Strongly agree (%) 30.0 25.0 42.9 16.7
3: Agree (%) 30.0 50.0 42.9 66.7
2: Disagree (%) 25.0 20.0 14.3 16.7
1: Strongly disagree (%) 15.0 5.0 . .
Total (N) 20 20 7 6

H5c: Performance Review feedback corresponds with my perceptions of own performance Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.0 3.0 3.3 2.8
4: Strongly agree (%) 25.0 25.0 28.6 33.3
3: Agree (%) 60.0 55.0 71.4 16.7
2: Disagree (%) 5.0 10.0 . 50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%) 10.0 10.0 . .
Total (N) 20 20 7 6

H5d: Performance Review feedback helps understand relation to other faculty Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.5 2.5 2.9 2.0
4: Strongly agree (%) 20.0 5.0 14.3 16.7
3: Agree (%) 30.0 55.0 57.1 .
2: Disagree (%) 25.0 20.0 28.6 50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%) 25.0 20.0 . 33.3
Total (N) 20 20 7 6

H5e: Feedback given appropriate weight in merit raises Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.6 2.5 3.3 2.2
4: Strongly agree (%) 10.0 5.9 50.0 16.7
3: Agree (%) 55.0 58.8 33.3 16.7
2: Disagree (%) 15.0 11.8 16.7 33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%) 20.0 23.5 . 33.3
Total (N) 20 17 6 6

H6: Understanding of current Academic Tenure Policy Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.3 3.0 3.1 2.0
4: Very well (%) 40.0 25.0 25.0 .
3: Fairly well (%) 55.0 50.0 62.5 33.3
2: Not very well (%) . 20.0 12.5 33.3
1: Not at all (%) 5.0 5.0 . 33.3
Total (N) 20 20 8 6

H7_1: Participated in RPT process as candidate Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
No (%) 45.0 20.0 25.0 71.4
Yes (%) 55.0 80.0 75.0 28.6
Total (N) 20 20 8 7

H7_2: Participated in RPT process as voter Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
No (%) 20.0 30.0 100.0 85.7
Yes (%) 80.0 70.0 . 14.3
Total (N) 20 20 8 7

H7_3: Participated in RPT process as review committee member Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
No (%) 10.0 55.0 100.0 100.0
Yes (%) 90.0 45.0 . .
Total (N) 20 20 8 7

H7_4: Have never participated in RPT process Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
No (%) 95.0 90.0 75.0 42.9
Yes (%) 5.0 10.0 25.0 57.1
Total (N) 20 20 8 7

H8: Understand dept RPT standards Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.4 3.1 3.0 2.7
4: Very well (%) 45.0 35.0 25.0 33.3
3: Fairly well (%) 45.0 40.0 50.0 16.7
2: Not very well (%) 10.0 20.0 25.0 33.3
1: Not at all (%) . 5.0 . 16.7
Total (N) 20 20 8 6

H9: Understand dept RPT procedures Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.6 3.2 3.1 2.3
4: Very well (%) 65.0 40.0 25.0 16.7
3: Fairly well (%) 30.0 35.0 62.5 16.7
2: Not very well (%) 5.0 25.0 12.5 50.0
1: Not at all (%) . . . 16.7
Total (N) 20 20 8 6

H10: Departmental RPT standards applied consistently/fairly Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.9 2.8 2.8 3.4
4: Strongly agree (%) 26.3 18.8 25.0 40.0
3: Agree (%) 47.4 56.3 25.0 60.0
2: Disagree (%) 15.8 12.5 50.0 .
1: Strongly disagree (%) 10.5 12.5 . .
Total (N) 19 16 4 5

H11: Departmental RPT procedures applied consistently/fairly Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.3 3.2 3.3 3.3
4: Strongly agree (%) 47.4 33.3 50.0 50.0
3: Agree (%) 36.8 53.3 25.0 25.0
2: Disagree (%) 10.5 13.3 25.0 25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%) 5.3 . . .
Total (N) 19 15 4 4

H12a: Sufficient resources for teaching/mentoring students Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.9 2.7 3.0 2.5
4: Strongly agree (%) 15.0 10.5 28.6 .
3: Agree (%) 60.0 52.6 42.9 50.0
2: Disagree (%) 20.0 31.6 28.6 50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%) 5.0 5.3 . .
Total (N) 20 19 7 4

H12b: Sufficient resources for discovery of knowledge Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.4 2.8 3.3 2.3
4: Strongly agree (%) 10.5 11.1 28.6 .
3: Agree (%) 36.8 66.7 71.4 33.3
2: Disagree (%) 36.8 16.7 . 66.7
1: Strongly disagree (%) 15.8 5.6 . .
Total (N) 19 18 7 6

H12c: Sufficient resources for creative artistry and literature Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.0 3.0 3.5 2.7
4: Strongly agree (%) . . 50.0 .
3: Agree (%) . 100.0 50.0 66.7
2: Disagree (%) 100.0 . . 33.3
Total (N) 2 5 2 3

H12d: Sufficient resources for tech/managerial innovation Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.2 2.6 3.0 2.6
4: Strongly agree (%) . 7.7 20.0 .
3: Agree (%) 50.0 61.5 60.0 60.0
2: Disagree (%) 20.0 15.4 20.0 40.0
1: Strongly disagree (%) 30.0 15.4 . .
Total (N) 10 13 5 5

H12e: Sufficient resources for extension/engagement Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.5 2.6 3.2 3.0
4: Strongly agree (%) 12.5 7.1 40.0 16.7
3: Agree (%) 43.8 50.0 40.0 66.7
2: Disagree (%) 25.0 35.7 20.0 16.7
1: Strongly disagree (%) 18.8 7.1 . .
Total (N) 16 14 5 6

H12f: Sufficient resources for professional service Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.4 2.7 2.8 2.8
4: Strongly agree (%) 15.8 11.1 33.3 .
3: Agree (%) 26.3 55.6 33.3 80.0
2: Disagree (%) 42.1 27.8 16.7 20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%) 15.8 5.6 16.7 .
Total (N) 19 18 6 5

H13a: Department rewards teaching/mentoring of students Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.7 2.7 2.9 2.6
4: Strongly agree (%) 15.8 11.8 . .
3: Agree (%) 47.4 58.8 85.7 60.0
2: Disagree (%) 31.6 17.6 14.3 40.0
1: Strongly disagree (%) 5.3 11.8 . .
Total (N) 19 17 7 5

H13b: Department rewards discovery of knowledge Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.2 3.2 3.3 2.3
4: Strongly agree (%) 47.4 33.3 33.3 .
3: Agree (%) 36.8 55.6 66.7 33.3
2: Disagree (%) 5.3 5.6 . 66.7
1: Strongly disagree (%) 10.5 5.6 . .
Total (N) 19 18 6 6

H13c: Department rewards creative artistry and literature Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.0 2.8 3.0 2.7
3: Agree (%) . 80.0 100.0 66.7
2: Disagree (%) 100.0 20.0 . 33.3
Total (N) 2 5 1 3

H13d: Department rewards tech/managerial innovation Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.4 2.8 3.0 3.0
4: Strongly agree (%) . 16.7 . .
3: Agree (%) 54.5 58.3 100.0 100.0
2: Disagree (%) 27.3 16.7 . .
1: Strongly disagree (%) 18.2 8.3 . .
Total (N) 11 12 4 5

H13e: Department rewards extension/engagement Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.5 2.9 3.0 3.2
4: Strongly agree (%) 6.3 26.7 . 40.0
3: Agree (%) 56.3 40.0 100.0 40.0
2: Disagree (%) 18.8 33.3 . 20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%) 18.8 . . .
Total (N) 16 15 6 5

H13f: Department rewards professional service Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.6 2.7 2.7 3.3
4: Strongly agree (%) 15.8 16.7 . 33.3
3: Agree (%) 36.8 55.6 66.7 66.7
2: Disagree (%) 36.8 11.1 33.3 .
1: Strongly disagree (%) 10.5 16.7 . .
Total (N) 19 18 6 3
Back to Top

Section I: Post-Tenure Review

I1_1: No experience with PTR Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Has experience (%) 85.0 80.0 . 33.3
No experience (%) 15.0 20.0 100.0 66.7
Total (N) 20 20 8 3

I1_2: Have had PTR Comprehensive Review Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
No (%) 40.0 30.0 100.0 100.0
Yes (%) 60.0 70.0 . .
Total (N) 20 20 8 3

I1_3: Have served on PTR committee Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
No (%) 25.0 70.0 100.0 100.0
Yes (%) 75.0 30.0 . .
Total (N) 20 20 8 3

I1_4: Have been dept/college administrator in PTR process Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
No (%) 85.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
Yes (%) 15.0 . . .
Total (N) 20 20 8 3

I1_5: Had other PTR experience Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
No (%) 95.0 95.0 100.0 100.0
Yes (%) 5.0 5.0 . .
Total (N) 20 20 8 3

I2a: Easy to find PTR information on NCSU website Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.1 2.9 3.0 3.0
4: Strongly agree (%) 25.0 18.8 33.3 .
3: Agree (%) 60.0 62.5 33.3 100.0
2: Disagree (%) 10.0 12.5 33.3 .
1: Strongly disagree (%) 5.0 6.3 . .
Total (N) 20 16 3 1

I2b: PTR process known/understood in department Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.8 2.7 2.7 2.0
4: Strongly agree (%) 15.0 6.7 16.7 .
3: Agree (%) 55.0 60.0 50.0 .
2: Disagree (%) 25.0 26.7 16.7 100.0
1: Strongly disagree (%) 5.0 6.7 16.7 .
Total (N) 20 15 6 1

I2c: Departmental PTR procedures are clear Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.0 2.9 2.7 2.0
4: Strongly agree (%) 25.0 6.3 16.7 .
3: Agree (%) 55.0 81.3 50.0 .
2: Disagree (%) 15.0 6.3 16.7 100.0
1: Strongly disagree (%) 5.0 6.3 16.7 .
Total (N) 20 16 6 1

I2d: Departmental PTR standards are clear Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.7 2.8 2.5 2.0
4: Strongly agree (%) 10.0 . . .
3: Agree (%) 60.0 81.3 66.7 .
2: Disagree (%) 20.0 12.5 16.7 100.0
1: Strongly disagree (%) 10.0 6.3 16.7 .
Total (N) 20 16 6 1

I2e: Departmental PTR procedures are followed equitably Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.1 2.9 3.0 2.0
4: Strongly agree (%) 10.5 . 25.0 .
3: Agree (%) 84.2 92.9 50.0 .
2: Disagree (%) 5.3 . 25.0 100.0
1: Strongly disagree (%) . 7.1 . .
Total (N) 19 14 4 1

I2f: Departmental PTR standards are applied fairly Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Mean Rating 3.0 2.9 3.5
4: Strongly agree (%) 5.9 . 50.0
3: Agree (%) 88.2 92.9 50.0
2: Disagree (%) 5.9 . .
1: Strongly disagree (%) . 7.1 .
Total (N) 17 14 2

I2g: Dept PTR committee members are well prepared and trained Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Mean Rating 2.7 2.6 2.0
4: Strongly agree (%) 5.3 . .
3: Agree (%) 63.2 75.0 50.0
2: Disagree (%) 26.3 8.3 .
1: Strongly disagree (%) 5.3 16.7 50.0
Total (N) 19 12 2

I3: Overall satisfaction with PTR process Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Mean Rating 2.7 2.6 3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%) 5.0 6.3 .
3: Satisfied (%) 70.0 62.5 100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%) 10.0 12.5 .
1: Very dissatisfied (%) 15.0 18.8 .
Total (N) 20 16 1
Back to Top

Section J: Pay and Compensation

J1a: My salary is competitive within my department Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.9 2.6 2.4 2.0
4: Strongly agree (%) 15.0 6.7 . .
3: Agree (%) 65.0 66.7 57.1 20.0
2: Disagree (%) 10.0 6.7 28.6 60.0
1: Strongly disagree (%) 10.0 20.0 14.3 20.0
Total (N) 20 15 7 5

J1b: My salary is competitive within my college Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.8 2.3 2.5 1.8
4: Strongly agree (%) 10.5 . . .
3: Agree (%) 68.4 40.0 50.0 20.0
2: Disagree (%) 10.5 50.0 50.0 40.0
1: Strongly disagree (%) 10.5 10.0 . 40.0
Total (N) 19 10 4 5

J1c: My salary is competitive within NC State Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.6 2.2 1.8 2.0
4: Strongly agree (%) 11.1 . . .
3: Agree (%) 50.0 36.4 . 50.0
2: Disagree (%) 22.2 45.5 80.0 .
1: Strongly disagree (%) 16.7 18.2 20.0 50.0
Total (N) 18 11 5 4

J1d: My salary is competitive within UNC system Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.6 2.6 1.5 1.0
4: Strongly agree (%) 13.3 . . .
3: Agree (%) 46.7 75.0 . .
2: Disagree (%) 26.7 12.5 50.0 .
1: Strongly disagree (%) 13.3 12.5 50.0 100.0
Total (N) 15 8 4 2

J1e: My salary is competitive within discipline at comparable institutions Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.5 2.4 1.9 2.2
4: Strongly agree (%) 5.0 . . .
3: Agree (%) 55.0 50.0 12.5 50.0
2: Disagree (%) 25.0 41.7 62.5 16.7
1: Strongly disagree (%) 15.0 8.3 25.0 33.3
Total (N) 20 12 8 6

J2: Understand how faculty salaries determined Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.6 2.0 2.6 2.2
4: Very well (%) 25.0 5.0 . 16.7
3: Fairly well (%) 30.0 30.0 75.0 16.7
2: Not very well (%) 20.0 20.0 12.5 33.3
1: Not at all (%) 25.0 45.0 12.5 33.3
Total (N) 20 20 8 6

J3: My department links salary increase to meritorious performance Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.7 2.4 3.2 1.8
4: Strongly agree (%) 21.1 6.3 16.7 .
3: Agree (%) 52.6 50.0 83.3 20.0
2: Disagree (%) 5.3 25.0 . 40.0
1: Strongly disagree (%) 21.1 18.8 . 40.0
Total (N) 19 16 6 5

J4: I have access to benefits information Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.3
4: Strongly agree (%) 35.0 40.0 50.0 50.0
3: Agree (%) 60.0 55.0 50.0 33.3
2: Disagree (%) 5.0 5.0 . 16.7
Total (N) 20 20 8 6

J5: Healthcare benefits are competitive with other institutions Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 1.9 1.7 2.1 1.7
3: Agree (%) 26.3 10.5 37.5 .
2: Disagree (%) 36.8 52.6 37.5 66.7
1: Strongly disagree (%) 36.8 36.8 25.0 33.3
Total (N) 19 19 8 6

J6: Retirement programs are competitive with other institutions Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.3 2.5 2.5 2.5
4: Strongly agree (%) 5.3 . . .
3: Agree (%) 36.8 60.0 62.5 66.7
2: Disagree (%) 36.8 33.3 25.0 16.7
1: Strongly disagree (%) 21.1 6.7 12.5 16.7
Total (N) 19 15 8 6

J7: Voluntary benefits programs are competitive with other institutions Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.8 2.7 2.7 2.7
4: Strongly agree (%) 11.1 . 16.7 .
3: Agree (%) 72.2 76.9 50.0 66.7
2: Disagree (%) 5.6 15.4 16.7 33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%) 11.1 7.7 16.7 .
Total (N) 18 13 6 3

J8: I am satisfied with my compensation at NC State Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.6 2.5 2.4 2.0
4: Strongly agree (%) 5.0 5.0 . .
3: Agree (%) 65.0 45.0 37.5 33.3
2: Disagree (%) 15.0 45.0 62.5 33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%) 15.0 5.0 . 33.3
Total (N) 20 20 8 6

J9: Departmental environment enables work/personal life balance Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.0 2.7 3.3 3.2
4: Strongly agree (%) 15.0 15.0 37.5 33.3
3: Agree (%) 70.0 50.0 50.0 50.0
2: Disagree (%) 10.0 25.0 12.5 16.7
1: Strongly disagree (%) 5.0 10.0 . .
Total (N) 20 20 8 6

J10: NCSU environment enables work/personal life balance Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.9 2.6 3.1 2.5
4: Strongly agree (%) 10.0 10.0 25.0 .
3: Agree (%) 70.0 45.0 62.5 66.7
2: Disagree (%) 15.0 35.0 12.5 16.7
1: Strongly disagree (%) 5.0 10.0 . 16.7
Total (N) 20 20 8 6

J11a: Importance of flexible work hours Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.8 3.9 3.9 4.0
4: Very important (%) 75.0 85.0 87.5 100.0
3: Somewhat important (%) 25.0 15.0 12.5 .
Total (N) 20 20 8 6

J11b: Importance of maternity/paternity leave Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.5 3.7 3.9 3.7
4: Very important (%) 55.0 70.0 87.5 66.7
3: Somewhat important (%) 40.0 30.0 12.5 33.3
1: Not at all important (%) 5.0 . . .
Total (N) 20 20 8 6

J11c: Importance of family leave time Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.5 3.6 3.9 3.7
4: Very important (%) 55.0 55.0 87.5 66.7
3: Somewhat important (%) 40.0 45.0 12.5 33.3
1: Not at all important (%) 5.0 . . .
Total (N) 20 20 8 6

J11d: Importance of altering tenure clock for family concerns Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.6 3.6 4.0 3.3
4: Very important (%) 70.0 60.0 100.0 66.7
3: Somewhat important (%) 25.0 40.0 . .
2: Not very important (%) . . . 33.3
1: Not at all important (%) 5.0 . . .
Total (N) 20 20 8 6

J11e: Importance of childcare facility on or near campus Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.3 3.2 3.8 3.7
4: Very important (%) 50.0 40.0 75.0 83.3
3: Somewhat important (%) 35.0 40.0 25.0 .
2: Not very important (%) 10.0 20.0 . 16.7
1: Not at all important (%) 5.0 . . .
Total (N) 20 20 8 6

J11f: Importance of tuition remission for dependents Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.2 3.3 3.9 3.8
4: Very important (%) 47.4 50.0 87.5 83.3
3: Somewhat important (%) 31.6 30.0 12.5 16.7
2: Not very important (%) 10.5 15.0 . .
1: Not at all important (%) 10.5 5.0 . .
Total (N) 19 20 8 6
Back to Top

Section K: Campus Infrastructure/Physical Environment

K1: I have sufficient clerical/admin support in my dept Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.2 2.5 2.8 2.8
4: Strongly agree (%) 10.0 10.5 25.0 33.3
3: Agree (%) 25.0 47.4 37.5 16.7
2: Disagree (%) 40.0 21.1 25.0 50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%) 25.0 21.1 12.5 .
Total (N) 20 19 8 6

K2: I have sufficient tech assistance Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.4 2.5 2.9 3.0
4: Strongly agree (%) 10.0 10.0 25.0 16.7
3: Agree (%) 40.0 40.0 37.5 66.7
2: Disagree (%) 30.0 35.0 37.5 16.7
1: Strongly disagree (%) 20.0 15.0 . .
Total (N) 20 20 8 6

K3: There is sufficient support staff in my college Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.6 2.5 3.3 2.8
4: Strongly agree (%) 10.5 10.0 25.0 16.7
3: Agree (%) 52.6 45.0 75.0 50.0
2: Disagree (%) 26.3 30.0 . 33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%) 10.5 15.0 . .
Total (N) 19 20 8 6

K4a: Satisfaction with office space Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.0 3.0 3.1 2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%) 35.0 20.0 25.0 50.0
3: Satisfied (%) 35.0 60.0 62.5 .
2: Dissatisfied (%) 25.0 15.0 12.5 16.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%) 5.0 5.0 . 33.3
Total (N) 20 20 8 6

K4b: Satisfaction with lab space Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.7 2.4 2.7 2.3
4: Very Satisfied (%) 16.7 16.7 . 33.3
3: Satisfied (%) 50.0 25.0 66.7 .
2: Dissatisfied (%) 16.7 41.7 33.3 33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%) 16.7 16.7 . 33.3
Total (N) 12 12 3 3

K4c: Satisfaction with classrooms in which you teach Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.8 2.8 3.0 2.0
4: Very Satisfied (%) 11.8 6.3 28.6 .
3: Satisfied (%) 52.9 68.8 42.9 25.0
2: Dissatisfied (%) 35.3 18.8 28.6 50.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%) . 6.3 . 25.0
Total (N) 17 16 7 4

K4d: Satisfaction with labs in which you teach Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.8 2.9 3.0 2.0
4: Very Satisfied (%) 12.5 . 25.0 .
3: Satisfied (%) 50.0 85.7 50.0 33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%) 37.5 14.3 25.0 33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%) . . . 33.3
Total (N) 8 7 4 3

K4e: Satisfaction with maintenance of building in which you work Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.5 2.8 2.4 2.0
4: Very Satisfied (%) . 15.0 . .
3: Satisfied (%) 60.0 65.0 50.0 33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%) 25.0 5.0 37.5 33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%) 15.0 15.0 12.5 33.3
Total (N) 20 20 8 6

K4f: Satisfaction with infrastructure of bldgs in which you work Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.4 2.5 2.5 1.8
4: Very Satisfied (%) . 5.0 . .
3: Satisfied (%) 55.0 60.0 75.0 33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%) 30.0 15.0 . 16.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%) 15.0 20.0 25.0 50.0
Total (N) 20 20 8 6

K4g: Satisfaction with availability of up-to-date equipment Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.7 2.6 3.0 2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%) 10.5 10.5 12.5 16.7
3: Satisfied (%) 47.4 52.6 75.0 50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%) 42.1 26.3 12.5 33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%) . 10.5 . .
Total (N) 19 19 8 6

K4h: Satisfaction with availability of office supplies Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.3 3.3 3.5 3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%) 40.0 35.0 50.0 33.3
3: Satisfied (%) 50.0 60.0 50.0 66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%) 10.0 . . .
1: Very dissatisfied (%) . 5.0 . .
Total (N) 20 20 8 6

K4i: Satisfaction with availability of informal meeting space Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.7 2.8 2.9 2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%) 5.0 10.0 12.5 16.7
3: Satisfied (%) 65.0 55.0 62.5 33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%) 25.0 35.0 25.0 33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%) 5.0 . . 16.7
Total (N) 20 20 8 6

K4j: Satisfaction with dining options on campus Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.1 2.8 2.8 1.7
4: Very Satisfied (%) . 7.1 . .
3: Satisfied (%) 30.8 71.4 80.0 33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%) 46.2 14.3 20.0 .
1: Very dissatisfied (%) 23.1 7.1 . 66.7
Total (N) 13 14 5 3

K4k: Satisfaction with availability of parking Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 1.7 1.9 2.0 1.7
3: Satisfied (%) 20.0 20.0 25.0 16.7
2: Dissatisfied (%) 25.0 50.0 50.0 33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%) 55.0 30.0 25.0 50.0
Total (N) 20 20 8 6

K4l: Satisfaction with cost of parking Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 1.5 1.7 1.9 1.2
3: Satisfied (%) 10.0 15.0 25.0 .
2: Dissatisfied (%) 25.0 40.0 37.5 20.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%) 65.0 45.0 37.5 80.0
Total (N) 20 20 8 5

K4m: Satisfaction with Wolfline Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.7 2.7 3.0 1.7
4: Very Satisfied (%) 14.3 . . .
3: Satisfied (%) 57.1 71.4 100.0 .
2: Dissatisfied (%) 14.3 28.6 . 66.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%) 14.3 . . 33.3
Total (N) 7 7 2 3

K4n: Satisfaction with commute between Centennial and main Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.3 2.3 3.0 2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%) 11.1 . . .
3: Satisfied (%) 44.4 57.1 100.0 66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%) 11.1 14.3 . 33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%) 33.3 28.6 . .
Total (N) 9 7 6 3

K4o: Satisfaction with campus safety Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.9 2.7 3.0 2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%) 5.3 5.3 12.5 .
3: Satisfied (%) 84.2 68.4 75.0 80.0
2: Dissatisfied (%) 10.5 15.8 12.5 20.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%) . 10.5 . .
Total (N) 19 19 8 5

K4p: Satisfaction with campus aesthetics Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.3 2.3 2.5 2.2
3: Satisfied (%) 45.0 50.0 50.0 33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%) 40.0 25.0 50.0 50.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%) 15.0 25.0 . 16.7
Total (N) 20 20 8 6

K4q: Satisfaction with upkeep of campus grounds Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.7 2.6 2.9 2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%) 5.0 5.3 12.5 .
3: Satisfied (%) 70.0 63.2 62.5 66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%) 10.0 15.8 25.0 33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%) 15.0 15.8 . .
Total (N) 20 19 8 6

K4r: Satisfaction with amount of green space Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.0 2.0 2.3 2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%) 10.5 . . .
3: Satisfied (%) 15.8 30.0 50.0 66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%) 36.8 35.0 25.0 16.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%) 36.8 35.0 25.0 16.7
Total (N) 19 20 8 6

K5a: Satisfaction with energy conservation Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.5 2.2 2.5 2.6
3: Satisfied (%) 52.9 27.8 62.5 60.0
2: Dissatisfied (%) 41.2 66.7 25.0 40.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%) 5.9 5.6 12.5 .
Total (N) 17 18 8 5

K5b: Satisfaction with water conservation Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.6 2.4 2.4 2.5
3: Satisfied (%) 56.3 47.1 50.0 50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%) 43.8 47.1 37.5 50.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%) . 5.9 12.5 .
Total (N) 16 17 8 4

K5c: Satisfaction with recycling efforts Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.7 2.8 3.0 3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%) 5.6 5.3 12.5 33.3
3: Satisfied (%) 61.1 68.4 75.0 66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%) 33.3 26.3 12.5 .
Total (N) 18 19 8 6

K5d: Satisfaction with alternative transportation Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.5 2.1 2.8 3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%) 6.7 . 12.5 25.0
3: Satisfied (%) 40.0 33.3 50.0 75.0
2: Dissatisfied (%) 46.7 44.4 37.5 .
1: Very dissatisfied (%) 6.7 22.2 . .
Total (N) 15 18 8 4

K5e: Satisfaction with green building practices Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.2 1.9 2.2 2.8
3: Satisfied (%) 36.4 25.0 33.3 75.0
2: Dissatisfied (%) 45.5 41.7 50.0 25.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%) 18.2 33.3 16.7 .
Total (N) 11 12 6 4

K5f: Satisfaction with use of recycled-content resources Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.7 2.4 2.7 2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%) . . 14.3 .
3: Satisfied (%) 66.7 45.5 42.9 66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%) 33.3 45.5 42.9 33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%) . 9.1 . .
Total (N) 12 11 7 3

K6: Interest in hotel/conference center on Centennial Campus Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.1 2.1 3.0 3.0
4: A lot (%) 45.0 15.0 37.5 33.3
3: Some (%) 30.0 25.0 37.5 50.0
2: A little (%) 10.0 15.0 12.5 .
1: None at all (%) 15.0 45.0 12.5 16.7
Total (N) 20 20 8 6

K7: Likelihood of using conference center on Centennial Campus Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.3 2.5 3.4 3.0
4: Very likely (%) 45.0 20.0 50.0 33.3
3: Somewhat likely (%) 45.0 35.0 37.5 33.3
2: Not very likely (%) 5.0 15.0 12.5 33.3
1: Not at all likely (%) 5.0 30.0 . .
Total (N) 20 20 8 6
Back to Top

Section L: Recreation/Wellness

L1: Satisfaction with recreation activities on campus Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.2 3.0 3.0 2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%) 15.0 5.3 25.0 16.7
3: Satisfied (%) 85.0 89.5 50.0 33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%) . 5.3 25.0 50.0
Total (N) 20 19 8 6

L2: Satisfaction with cultural activities on campus Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.9 3.0 3.1 3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%) 10.0 5.0 12.5 .
3: Satisfied (%) 70.0 85.0 87.5 100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%) 20.0 10.0 . .
Total (N) 20 20 8 6

L3a: Satisfaction with Carmichael Gymnasium Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.1 3.1 2.9 3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%) 18.8 13.3 42.9 20.0
3: Satisfied (%) 75.0 86.7 14.3 80.0
2: Dissatisfied (%) 6.3 . 28.6 .
1: Very dissatisfied (%) . . 14.3 .
Total (N) 16 15 7 5

L3b: Satisfaction with recreation space around campus Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.1 3.1 3.3 2.4
4: Very Satisfied (%) 6.3 11.8 28.6 20.0
3: Satisfied (%) 93.8 82.4 71.4 20.0
2: Dissatisfied (%) . 5.9 . 40.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%) . . . 20.0
Total (N) 16 17 7 5

L3c: Satisfaction with organized Campus Recreation activities Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.9 3.2 3.2 2.4
4: Very Satisfied (%) . 15.4 40.0 .
3: Satisfied (%) 90.0 84.6 40.0 40.0
2: Dissatisfied (%) 10.0 . 20.0 60.0
Total (N) 10 13 5 5

L3d: Satisfaction with ARTS NC State programs Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.7 3.1 3.3 3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%) . 18.8 33.3 25.0
3: Satisfied (%) 69.2 75.0 66.7 75.0
2: Dissatisfied (%) 30.8 6.3 . .
Total (N) 13 16 6 4

L3e: Satisfaction with Wolfpack athletic events Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.7 3.3 3.2 2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%) 7.1 35.7 33.3 .
3: Satisfied (%) 71.4 57.1 50.0 60.0
2: Dissatisfied (%) 7.1 7.1 16.7 40.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%) 14.3 . . .
Total (N) 14 14 6 5

L4a: How often use Carmichael Gymnasium Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 3.5 3.9 4.6 4.2
Once a week or more (%) 36.8 45.0 62.5 50.0
A few times a month (%) 10.5 5.0 12.5 .
A few times a semester (%) 5.3 10.0 . 16.7
Once a semester (%) . 5.0 . .
Once a year (%) 5.3 . . 16.7
Never (%) 42.1 35.0 25.0 16.7
Total (N) 19 20 8 6

L4b: How often use recreational space around campus Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.1 3.2 4.1 3.0
Once a week or more (%) 5.3 20.0 37.5 .
A few times a month (%) 10.5 15.0 . 16.7
A few times a semester (%) . 15.0 37.5 33.3
Once a semester (%) 15.8 5.0 . .
Once a year (%) 5.3 . 12.5 33.3
Never (%) 63.2 45.0 12.5 16.7
Total (N) 19 20 8 6

L4c: How often participate in organized Campus Recreation activities Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 1.2 2.0 2.4 2.2
Once a week or more (%) . 10.5 . .
A few times a month (%) . . 12.5 .
A few times a semester (%) . 5.3 25.0 33.3
Once a semester (%) 5.0 15.8 . .
Once a year (%) 10.0 . 12.5 16.7
Never (%) 85.0 68.4 50.0 50.0
Total (N) 20 19 8 6

L4d: How often attend ARTS NC State programs Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.2 3.0 2.6 2.7
A few times a month (%) . . 12.5 16.7
A few times a semester (%) 25.0 60.0 25.0 16.7
Once a semester (%) 20.0 . 12.5 16.7
Once a year (%) 5.0 20.0 12.5 16.7
Never (%) 50.0 20.0 37.5 33.3
Total (N) 20 20 8 6

L4e: How often attend Wolfpack athletic events Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.5 2.4 3.0 2.8
A few times a month (%) . 5.0 37.5 16.7
A few times a semester (%) 35.0 25.0 12.5 16.7
Once a semester (%) 10.0 15.0 . 16.7
Once a year (%) 20.0 15.0 12.5 33.3
Never (%) 35.0 40.0 37.5 16.7
Total (N) 20 20 8 6

L5: Interest in designated faculty-only dining facility Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 2.2 2.1 2.5 3.3
4: A great deal (%) 25.0 25.0 25.0 66.7
3: Some (%) 10.0 5.0 25.0 16.7
2: A little (%) 25.0 25.0 25.0 .
1: None at all (%) 40.0 45.0 25.0 16.7
Total (N) 20 20 8 6

L6: Likelihood of using gym on Centennial campus Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure Track
(Any Rank)
Mean Rating 1.6 1.2 2.8 2.7
4: Very likely (%) 10.0 . 25.0 50.0
3: Somewhat likely (%) 10.0 5.3 25.0 .
2: Not very likely (%) 10.0 10.5 50.0 16.7
1: Not at all likely (%) 70.0 84.2 . 33.3
Total (N) 20 19 8 6
Back to Top

Section M: Work Activities

M1: Total hours per week spent performing job-related work (collapsed) Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure
Track
Mean # Hrs Work 58.7 55.0 54.6 52.8
more than 60 hrs (%) 26.3 5.0 12.5 16.7
51 to 60 hrs (%) 31.6 60.0 37.5 16.7
41 to 50 hrs (%) 36.8 30.0 50.0 66.7
40 hrs or less (%) 5.3 5.0 . .
Total (N) 19 20 8 6

M2A: Proportion of total hours spent on teaching/mentoring Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure
Track
Mean % of Time on Activity 28.0 32.5 31.9 38.1
more than 50% of time (%) 5.0 15.0 . 42.9
26% to 50% of time (%) 45.0 35.0 62.5 14.3
11% to 25% of time (%) 30.0 30.0 37.5 .
6% to 10% of time (%) 5.0 15.0 . 14.3
1% to 5% of time (%) 10.0 5.0 . .
0% of time (%) 5.0 . . 28.6
Total (N) 20 20 8 7

M2a_1r: Includes teaching
(among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)
Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure
Track
No (%) 26.3 20.0 37.5 20.0
Yes (%) 73.7 80.0 62.5 80.0
Total (N) 19 20 8 5

M2a_2r: Includes professional development to improve teaching
(among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)
Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure
Track
No (%) 63.2 55.0 75.0 40.0
Yes (%) 36.8 45.0 25.0 60.0
Total (N) 19 20 8 5

M2a_3r: Includes research projects with students
(among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)
Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure
Track
No (%) 26.3 15.0 37.5 20.0
Yes (%) 73.7 85.0 62.5 80.0
Total (N) 19 20 8 5

M2a_4r: Includes supervising internships/field experiences
(among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)
Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure
Track
No (%) 73.7 60.0 62.5 20.0
Yes (%) 26.3 40.0 37.5 80.0
Total (N) 19 20 8 5

M2a_5r: Includes student thesis/dissertation committee work
(among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)
Full Professor
(Tenure Track)
Associate Professor
(Tenure Track)
Asst Prof/Instructor
(Tenure Track)
Non-Tenure
Track