North Carolina State University
2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey:

Results for the College of Education
by Rank/Tenure Status1

To skip directly to a particular section, select the section below.

Section B: Image and Vision	Section I: Post-Tenure Review
Section C: Leadership	Section J: Pay and Compensation
Section D: Faculty-Administration Relationships	Section K: Campus Infrastructure/Physical Environment
Section E: Diversity/Multiculturalism	Section L: Recreation/Wellness
Section F: Working Relationships	Section M: Work Activities
Section G: Faculty Support & Professional Development	Section N: Conclusions/Overall Satisfaction
Section H: Performance Review, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure

To download a Microsoft Word version of this document, click here.

A2: Ever held an administrative position	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
..... No (%)	50.0	75.0	100.0	75.0
..... Yes (%)	50.0	25.0	.	25.0
Total (N)	18	12	14	8

Back to Top

Section B: Image and Vision

B1a: Department doing good job of recruiting faculty	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	3.2	2.9	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	22.2	18.2	14.3	.
3: Agree (%)	50.0	81.8	71.4	87.5
2: Disagree (%)	22.2	.	7.1	12.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.6	.	7.1	.
Total (N)	18	11	14	8

B1b: Department creating culture where faculty can develop to full potential	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	2.5	2.8	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	35.3	8.3	21.4	.
3: Agree (%)	41.2	50.0	50.0	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	17.6	25.0	14.3	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.9	16.7	14.3	.
Total (N)	17	12	14	8

B1c: Department retaining most effective and productive faculty	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	2.4	2.7	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	22.2	8.3	15.4	.
3: Agree (%)	61.1	41.7	46.2	71.4
2: Disagree (%)	11.1	33.3	30.8	28.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.6	16.7	7.7	.
Total (N)	18	12	13	7

B2a: Department national reputation for undergraduate educ	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.6	3.7	3.2	4.0
5: Very strong (%)	28.6	28.6	.	16.7
4: Strong (%)	21.4	28.6	16.7	66.7
3: Average (%)	35.7	28.6	83.3	16.7
2: Weak (%)	14.3	14.3	.	.
Total (N)	14	7	6	6

B2b: Department national reputation for graduate education	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.7	3.3	3.2	4.0
5: Very strong (%)	16.7	.	.	25.0
4: Strong (%)	44.4	41.7	28.6	50.0
3: Average (%)	33.3	50.0	64.3	25.0
2: Weak (%)	5.6	8.3	7.1	.
Total (N)	18	12	14	8

B2c: Department national reputation for research & scholarly activity	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.7	3.1	3.2	3.9
5: Very strong (%)	16.7	.	.	25.0
4: Strong (%)	44.4	16.7	35.7	37.5
3: Average (%)	33.3	75.0	50.0	37.5
2: Weak (%)	5.6	8.3	14.3	.
Total (N)	18	12	14	8

B2d: Department national reputation for creative artistry and literature	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	2.6	3.0	3.4
4: Strong (%)	25.0	.	16.7	60.0
3: Average (%)	50.0	60.0	66.7	20.0
2: Weak (%)	25.0	40.0	16.7	20.0
Total (N)	4	5	6	5

B2e: Department national reputation for tech & managerial innovation	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.7	3.7	3.1	3.4
5: Very strong (%)	20.0	11.1	9.1	14.3
4: Strong (%)	40.0	55.6	27.3	57.1
3: Average (%)	30.0	22.2	27.3	.
2: Weak (%)	10.0	11.1	36.4	14.3
1: Very weak (%)	.	.	.	14.3
Total (N)	10	9	11	7

B2f: Department national reputation for extension & engagement	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.8	3.3	3.4	4.1
5: Very strong (%)	17.6	.	.	28.6
4: Strong (%)	41.2	40.0	42.9	57.1
3: Average (%)	41.2	50.0	50.0	14.3
2: Weak (%)	.	10.0	7.1	.
Total (N)	17	10	14	7

B2g: Department national reputation for contrib to econ Development	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.2	2.8	3.0	3.4
4: Strong (%)	33.3	16.7	12.5	60.0
3: Average (%)	55.6	50.0	75.0	20.0
2: Weak (%)	11.1	33.3	12.5	20.0
Total (N)	9	6	8	5

B3a: Grade undergraduate majors' ability to meet prog demands	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	4.3	4.4	4.0	4.7
A (%)	42.9	37.5	16.7	66.7
B (%)	42.9	62.5	66.7	33.3
C (%)	14.3	.	16.7	.
Total (N)	14	8	6	6

B3b: Grade graduate student ability to meet prog demands	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	4.4	4.1	3.6	4.6
A (%)	44.4	25.0	7.1	62.5
B (%)	50.0	58.3	57.1	37.5
C (%)	5.6	16.7	28.6	.
D (%)	.	.	7.1	.
Total (N)	18	12	14	8

B3c: Grade demonstrated professional ability of faculty	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	4.6	4.2	3.9	4.6
A (%)	61.1	25.0	21.4	62.5
B (%)	38.9	66.7	42.9	37.5
C (%)	.	8.3	35.7	.
Total (N)	18	12	14	8

B3d: Grade professional achievement of faculty	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	4.3	4.0	4.0	4.6
A (%)	38.9	25.0	21.4	62.5
B (%)	55.6	50.0	57.1	37.5
C (%)	5.6	25.0	21.4	.
Total (N)	18	12	14	8

B3e: Grade own demonstrated professional ability	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	4.7	4.5	4.1	4.5
A (%)	70.6	50.0	14.3	62.5
B (%)	29.4	50.0	78.6	25.0
C (%)	.	.	7.1	12.5
Total (N)	17	12	14	8

B3f: Grade own professional achievement	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	4.6	4.4	4.1	4.5
A (%)	58.8	41.7	14.3	62.5
B (%)	41.2	58.3	78.6	25.0
C (%)	.	.	7.1	12.5
Total (N)	17	12	14	8

B4: Department's vision for the future	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Clear vision; actively working toward goals (%)	38.9	8.3	21.4	12.5
Vision with slow progress (%)	27.8	58.3	42.9	75.0
No clear vision (%)	33.3	33.3	35.7	12.5
Total (N)	18	12	14	8

B5: Agreement with department vision for future	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.6	3.0	3.3	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	58.3	.	33.3	14.3
3: Agree (%)	41.7	100.0	66.7	85.7
Total (N)	12	8	9	7

B6: College's vision for the future	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Clear vision; actively working toward goals (%)	44.4	50.0	57.1	37.5
Vision with slow progress (%)	38.9	50.0	28.6	62.5
No clear vision (%)	16.7	.	14.3	.
Total (N)	18	12	14	8

B7a: Department change in next five years	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Change for the better (%)	72.2	75.0	78.6	87.5
Change for the worse (%)	5.6	8.3	.	.
Not really change (%)	22.2	16.7	21.4	12.5
Total (N)	18	12	14	8

B7b: College change in next five years	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Change for the better (%)	77.8	58.3	71.4	62.5
Change for the worse (%)	5.6	16.7	7.1	12.5
Not really change (%)	16.7	25.0	21.4	25.0
Total (N)	18	12	14	8

B7c: NC State change in next five years	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Change for the better (%)	55.6	58.3	78.6	62.5
Change for the worse (%)	.	25.0	7.1	.
Not really change (%)	44.4	16.7	14.3	37.5
Total (N)	18	12	14	8

Back to Top

Section C: Leadership

C1a: Dept admin communication with faculty	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.4	2.6	2.9	3.1
4: Excellent (%)	70.6	33.3	35.7	37.5
3: Good (%)	11.8	16.7	28.6	37.5
2: Fair (%)	5.9	25.0	28.6	25.0
1: Poor (%)	11.8	25.0	7.1	.
Total (N)	17	12	14	8

C1b: Dept admin seek faculty input for dept vision	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.3	2.6	3.1	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	55.6	25.0	50.0	25.0
3: Good (%)	22.2	25.0	14.3	25.0
2: Fair (%)	16.7	33.3	35.7	50.0
1: Poor (%)	5.6	16.7	.	.
Total (N)	18	12	14	8

C1c: Dept admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.4	2.8	2.9	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	66.7	33.3	42.9	25.0
3: Good (%)	16.7	25.0	14.3	25.0
2: Fair (%)	5.6	25.0	28.6	37.5
1: Poor (%)	11.1	16.7	14.3	12.5
Total (N)	18	12	14	8

C1d: Dept admin delegate dept responsibility to faculty	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.3	2.7	2.9	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	52.9	25.0	35.7	37.5
3: Good (%)	29.4	25.0	35.7	37.5
2: Fair (%)	11.8	41.7	7.1	12.5
1: Poor (%)	5.9	8.3	21.4	12.5
Total (N)	17	12	14	8

C1e: Dept admin grant faculty autonomy	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.7	3.2	3.1	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	83.3	58.3	50.0	25.0
3: Good (%)	5.6	16.7	28.6	37.5
2: Fair (%)	5.6	8.3	7.1	25.0
1: Poor (%)	5.6	16.7	14.3	12.5
Total (N)	18	12	14	8

C1f: Dept admin set clear and explicit priorities	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.3	2.9	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	11.8	8.3	35.7	25.0
3: Good (%)	58.8	25.0	21.4	37.5
2: Fair (%)	23.5	50.0	35.7	37.5
1: Poor (%)	5.9	16.7	7.1	.
Total (N)	17	12	14	8

C1g: Dept admin appreciate your contrib to mission	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.3	3.1	3.2	3.1
4: Excellent (%)	52.9	50.0	50.0	37.5
3: Good (%)	35.3	25.0	28.6	37.5
2: Fair (%)	.	8.3	14.3	25.0
1: Poor (%)	11.8	16.7	7.1	.
Total (N)	17	12	14	8

C1h: Dept admin conflict resolution	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.3	2.6	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	37.5	20.0	23.1	25.0
3: Good (%)	25.0	20.0	30.8	25.0
2: Fair (%)	18.8	30.0	30.8	37.5
1: Poor (%)	18.8	30.0	15.4	12.5
Total (N)	16	10	13	8

C1i: Dept admin provide necessary resources	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.4	3.0	3.0	3.3
4: Excellent (%)	41.2	33.3	42.9	37.5
3: Good (%)	58.8	41.7	28.6	50.0
2: Fair (%)	.	16.7	14.3	12.5
1: Poor (%)	.	8.3	14.3	.
Total (N)	17	12	14	8

C1j: Dept admin allocate resources fairly	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.6	3.2	3.2	3.1
4: Excellent (%)	73.3	50.0	53.8	25.0
3: Good (%)	13.3	25.0	30.8	62.5
2: Fair (%)	13.3	16.7	.	12.5
1: Poor (%)	.	8.3	15.4	.
Total (N)	15	12	13	8

C1k: Dept admin serve as advocate for dept to college	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.4	3.5	3.4	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	58.8	81.8	57.1	37.5
3: Good (%)	29.4	.	28.6	25.0
2: Fair (%)	.	.	14.3	25.0
1: Poor (%)	11.8	18.2	.	12.5
Total (N)	17	11	14	8

C1l: Dept admin support academic freedom	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.6	3.3	3.3	3.4
4: Excellent (%)	75.0	58.3	50.0	50.0
3: Good (%)	18.8	25.0	28.6	37.5
2: Fair (%)	.	.	21.4	12.5
1: Poor (%)	6.3	16.7	.	.
Total (N)	16	12	14	8

C1m: Dept admin make rational decisions	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.5	2.9	2.9	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	70.6	41.7	28.6	37.5
3: Good (%)	17.6	25.0	42.9	25.0
2: Fair (%)	5.9	16.7	14.3	37.5
1: Poor (%)	5.9	16.7	14.3	.
Total (N)	17	12	14	8

C1n: Dept admin make equitable decisions	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.5	3.0	3.3	3.3
4: Excellent (%)	64.7	41.7	42.9	37.5
3: Good (%)	23.5	33.3	42.9	50.0
2: Fair (%)	5.9	8.3	14.3	12.5
1: Poor (%)	5.9	16.7	.	.
Total (N)	17	12	14	8

C1o: Dept admin promote diversity within dept	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.3	3.0	2.9	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	52.9	33.3	30.8	25.0
3: Good (%)	29.4	41.7	38.5	50.0
2: Fair (%)	11.8	16.7	23.1	25.0
1: Poor (%)	5.9	8.3	7.7	.
Total (N)	17	12	13	8

C2a: College admin communication with faculty	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.6	2.4	2.7	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	.	.	14.3	.
3: Good (%)	70.6	50.0	50.0	71.4
2: Fair (%)	23.5	41.7	28.6	28.6
1: Poor (%)	5.9	8.3	7.1	.
Total (N)	17	12	14	7

C2b: College admin seek faculty input for vision	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.3	2.9	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	18.8	8.3	21.4	.
3: Good (%)	50.0	33.3	50.0	71.4
2: Fair (%)	25.0	33.3	21.4	28.6
1: Poor (%)	6.3	25.0	7.1	.
Total (N)	16	12	14	7

C2c: College admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.2	2.2	2.5	2.5
4: Excellent (%)	5.9	.	14.3	16.7
3: Good (%)	35.3	41.7	28.6	33.3
2: Fair (%)	35.3	33.3	50.0	33.3
1: Poor (%)	23.5	25.0	7.1	16.7
Total (N)	17	12	14	6

C2d: College admin grant departmental autonomy	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.6	2.5	2.9	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	37.5	9.1	21.4	.
3: Good (%)	18.8	54.5	57.1	62.5
2: Fair (%)	12.5	18.2	14.3	37.5
1: Poor (%)	31.3	18.2	7.1	.
Total (N)	16	11	14	8

C2e: College admin set clear and explicit priorities	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	3.2	3.3	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	29.4	45.5	42.9	14.3
3: Good (%)	47.1	36.4	50.0	71.4
2: Fair (%)	17.6	9.1	.	.
1: Poor (%)	5.9	9.1	7.1	14.3
Total (N)	17	11	14	7

C2f: College admin appreciate your contrib to mission	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.6	2.3	3.2	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	29.4	16.7	46.2	12.5
3: Good (%)	23.5	25.0	30.8	50.0
2: Fair (%)	29.4	25.0	15.4	37.5
1: Poor (%)	17.6	33.3	7.7	.
Total (N)	17	12	13	8

C2g: College admin conflict resolution	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.3	2.2	2.7	2.4
4: Excellent (%)	.	11.1	18.2	.
3: Good (%)	46.2	22.2	45.5	60.0
2: Fair (%)	38.5	44.4	27.3	20.0
1: Poor (%)	15.4	22.2	9.1	20.0
Total (N)	13	9	11	5

C2h: College admin provide necessary resources	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.7	2.8	2.9	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	11.8	16.7	14.3	12.5
3: Good (%)	52.9	50.0	64.3	50.0
2: Fair (%)	29.4	33.3	14.3	37.5
1: Poor (%)	5.9	.	7.1	.
Total (N)	17	12	14	8

C2i: College admin allocate resources fairly	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.5	2.9	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	35.7	9.1	25.0	16.7
3: Good (%)	21.4	36.4	58.3	50.0
2: Fair (%)	28.6	45.5	.	16.7
1: Poor (%)	14.3	9.1	16.7	16.7
Total (N)	14	11	12	6

C2j: College admin serve as advocate for college to univ	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.6	3.4	3.3	3.3
4: Excellent (%)	68.8	70.0	46.2	25.0
3: Good (%)	18.8	10.0	38.5	75.0
2: Fair (%)	12.5	10.0	15.4	.
1: Poor (%)	.	10.0	.	.
Total (N)	16	10	13	8

C2k: College admin support academic freedom	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	2.8	2.8	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	53.3	25.0	23.1	12.5
3: Good (%)	20.0	41.7	46.2	75.0
2: Fair (%)	13.3	16.7	23.1	12.5
1: Poor (%)	13.3	16.7	7.7	.
Total (N)	15	12	13	8

C2l: College admin make rational decisions	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8	2.9	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	23.5	16.7	28.6	16.7
3: Good (%)	41.2	50.0	42.9	33.3
2: Fair (%)	29.4	25.0	14.3	50.0
1: Poor (%)	5.9	8.3	14.3	.
Total (N)	17	12	14	6

C2m: College admin make equitable decisions	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.7	2.3	2.6	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	31.3	10.0	8.3	.
3: Good (%)	18.8	30.0	58.3	66.7
2: Fair (%)	37.5	40.0	16.7	33.3
1: Poor (%)	12.5	20.0	16.7	.
Total (N)	16	10	12	6

C2n: College admin promote diversity within college	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	2.5	2.5	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	52.9	18.2	15.4	12.5
3: Good (%)	17.6	27.3	30.8	50.0
2: Fair (%)	5.9	36.4	38.5	37.5
1: Poor (%)	23.5	18.2	15.4	.
Total (N)	17	11	13	8

C3a: Univ admin communication with faculty	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.7	2.4	2.5	2.3
4: Excellent (%)	6.3	10.0	.	.
3: Good (%)	62.5	50.0	53.8	42.9
2: Fair (%)	25.0	10.0	38.5	42.9
1: Poor (%)	6.3	30.0	7.7	14.3
Total (N)	16	10	13	7

C3b: Univ admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.4	2.2	2.6	2.3
4: Excellent (%)	.	16.7	11.1	.
3: Good (%)	57.1	.	33.3	25.0
2: Fair (%)	21.4	66.7	55.6	75.0
1: Poor (%)	21.4	16.7	.	.
Total (N)	14	6	9	4

C3c: Univ admin set clear and explicit priorities	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	2.6	2.8	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	17.6	9.1	15.4	.
3: Good (%)	64.7	45.5	46.2	57.1
2: Fair (%)	17.6	45.5	38.5	42.9
Total (N)	17	11	13	7

C3d: Univ admin serves as advocate for univ to constituents	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.5	3.0	3.2	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	52.9	30.0	27.3	14.3
3: Good (%)	41.2	50.0	63.6	71.4
2: Fair (%)	5.9	10.0	9.1	14.3
1: Poor (%)	.	10.0	.	.
Total (N)	17	10	11	7

C3e: Univ admin support academic freedom	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.3	2.6	2.8	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	46.7	20.0	30.8	25.0
3: Good (%)	40.0	30.0	30.8	50.0
2: Fair (%)	13.3	40.0	30.8	25.0
1: Poor (%)	.	10.0	7.7	.
Total (N)	15	10	13	8

C3f: Univ admin make rational decisions	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	2.7	3.0	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	12.5	9.1	9.1	.
3: Good (%)	68.8	54.5	81.8	60.0
2: Fair (%)	18.8	36.4	9.1	40.0
Total (N)	16	11	11	5

C3g: Univ admin make equitable decisions	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.6	2.9	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	7.1	11.1	10.0	.
3: Good (%)	64.3	44.4	70.0	60.0
2: Fair (%)	28.6	33.3	20.0	40.0
1: Poor (%)	.	11.1	.	.
Total (N)	14	9	10	5

C3h: Univ admin promote diversity within university	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	2.3	2.6	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	29.4	22.2	8.3	16.7
3: Good (%)	47.1	22.2	41.7	50.0
2: Fair (%)	23.5	22.2	50.0	33.3
1: Poor (%)	.	33.3	.	.
Total (N)	17	9	12	6

Back to Top

Section D: Faculty-Administration Relationships

D1a: I am encouraged to give input on curricular issues	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.9	3.6	3.5	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	94.4	75.0	57.1	50.0
3: Agree (%)	5.6	16.7	35.7	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	.	7.1	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	8.3	.	.
Total (N)	18	12	14	8

D1b: I am encouraged to give input on prog assessment	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.9	3.4	3.4	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	94.4	58.3	50.0	50.0
3: Agree (%)	5.6	33.3	42.9	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	8.3	7.1	.
Total (N)	18	12	14	8

D1c: I am encouraged to give input on dept hiring	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.8	3.5	3.4	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	83.3	66.7	57.1	25.0
3: Agree (%)	11.1	25.0	21.4	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	5.6	.	21.4	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	8.3	.	.
Total (N)	18	12	14	8

D1d: I am encouraged to give input on college admin appointments	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.7	2.4	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	29.4	16.7	21.4	12.5
3: Agree (%)	29.4	50.0	14.3	37.5
2: Disagree (%)	29.4	16.7	50.0	37.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	11.8	16.7	14.3	12.5
Total (N)	17	12	14	8

D1e: I am encouraged to give input on university admin appointments	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.4	2.2	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	27.8	16.7	15.4	12.5
3: Agree (%)	38.9	41.7	7.7	25.0
2: Disagree (%)	16.7	8.3	53.8	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	16.7	33.3	23.1	12.5
Total (N)	18	12	13	8

D2: Familiarity with academic program assessment in dept	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.7	3.4	3.4	3.5
4: Very familiar (%)	77.8	50.0	50.0	62.5
3: Somewhat familiar (%)	16.7	41.7	35.7	25.0
2: Not very familiar (%)	5.6	8.3	14.3	12.5
Total (N)	18	12	14	8

D3a: Understanding of resource allocation to university	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.4	2.3	2.4	2.3
4: Very well (%)	5.6	.	7.1	.
3: Fairly well (%)	38.9	41.7	21.4	25.0
2: Not very well (%)	44.4	41.7	71.4	75.0
1: Not at all (%)	11.1	16.7	.	.
Total (N)	18	12	14	8

D3b: Understanding of resource allocation to college	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.6	2.3	2.3	2.1
4: Very well (%)	5.6	.	7.1	.
3: Fairly well (%)	44.4	41.7	21.4	12.5
2: Not very well (%)	50.0	50.0	64.3	87.5
1: Not at all (%)	.	8.3	7.1	.
Total (N)	18	12	14	8

D3c: Understanding of resource allocation to department	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	2.3	2.6	2.4
4: Very well (%)	22.2	.	7.1	12.5
3: Fairly well (%)	44.4	41.7	42.9	12.5
2: Not very well (%)	33.3	41.7	50.0	75.0
1: Not at all (%)	.	16.7	.	.
Total (N)	18	12	14	8

D3d: Understanding of resource allocation within department	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.2	2.5	2.5	2.5
4: Very well (%)	38.9	8.3	.	12.5
3: Fairly well (%)	44.4	50.0	57.1	25.0
2: Not very well (%)	16.7	25.0	35.7	62.5
1: Not at all (%)	.	16.7	7.1	.
Total (N)	18	12	14	8

D4: Faculty have sufficient input on dept resource allocation	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.7	2.3	2.4	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	16.7	.	.	14.3
3: Agree (%)	50.0	50.0	50.0	71.4
2: Disagree (%)	22.2	33.3	42.9	14.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	11.1	16.7	7.1	.
Total (N)	18	12	14	7

D5: Dept faculty searches/appointments are collegial and inclusive	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.7	3.2	3.1	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	77.8	33.3	35.7	50.0
3: Agree (%)	16.7	58.3	42.9	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	5.6	.	14.3	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	8.3	7.1	.
Total (N)	18	12	14	8

D6a: Relations between faculty in dept and dept admin	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.6	2.8	3.1	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	66.7	33.3	35.7	37.5
3: Good (%)	22.2	33.3	35.7	25.0
2: Fair (%)	11.1	16.7	28.6	37.5
1: Poor (%)	.	16.7	.	.
Total (N)	18	12	14	8

D6b: Relations between faculty in dept and college admin	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.5	2.5	2.5
4: Excellent (%)	27.8	16.7	21.4	.
3: Good (%)	33.3	25.0	21.4	62.5
2: Fair (%)	27.8	50.0	42.9	25.0
1: Poor (%)	11.1	8.3	14.3	12.5
Total (N)	18	12	14	8

D6c: Relations between faculty in dept and univ admin	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	2.6	2.3	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	16.7	20.0	.	.
3: Good (%)	66.7	40.0	36.4	80.0
2: Fair (%)	8.3	20.0	54.5	20.0
1: Poor (%)	8.3	20.0	9.1	.
Total (N)	12	5	11	5

D6d: Relations between all faculty and univ admin	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	2.3	2.3	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	15.4	14.3	.	.
3: Good (%)	69.2	28.6	40.0	80.0
2: Fair (%)	7.7	28.6	50.0	20.0
1: Poor (%)	7.7	28.6	10.0	.
Total (N)	13	7	10	5

D7a: Faculty Senate effective commun between faculty and univ admin	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	2.7	2.4	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	6.7	22.2	.	.
3: Agree (%)	86.7	33.3	50.0	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	6.7	33.3	37.5	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	11.1	12.5	.
Total (N)	15	9	8	5

D7b: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty in general	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	2.7	2.4	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	14.3	22.2	.	.
3: Agree (%)	64.3	33.3	37.5	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	14.3	33.3	62.5	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.1	11.1	.	.
Total (N)	14	9	8	5

D7c: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty like me	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.7	2.4	2.4	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	7.7	12.5	.	.
3: Agree (%)	61.5	37.5	37.5	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	23.1	25.0	62.5	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.7	25.0	.	.
Total (N)	13	8	8	2

D8: Effectiveness of university grievance procedures	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	1.8	2.0	3.0
4: Very effective (%)	18.2	.	.	.
3: Somewhat effective (%)	45.5	25.0	.	100.0
2: Not very effective (%)	36.4	25.0	100.0	.
1: Not at all effective (%)	.	50.0	.	.
Total (N)	11	4	3	1

D9: Importance of "ombuds" for informal conflict resolution	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.6	3.8	3.3	3.5
4: Very important (%)	55.6	75.0	35.7	62.5
3: Somewhat important (%)	44.4	25.0	57.1	25.0
2: Not very important (%)	.	.	7.1	12.5
Total (N)	18	12	14	8

Back to Top

Section E: Diversity/Multiculturalism

E1: Importance of institutional emphasis on diversity/Multiculturalism	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.6	3.3	3.6	3.6
4: Very important (%)	66.7	41.7	64.3	62.5
3: Somewhat important (%)	27.8	41.7	28.6	37.5
2: Not very important (%)	.	16.7	7.1	.
1: Not at all important (%)	5.6	.	.	.
Total (N)	18	12	14	8

E2: Importance of diversity to enhanced learning in own classroom	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.5	3.3	3.6	3.5
4: Very important (%)	72.2	41.7	71.4	62.5
3: Somewhat important (%)	16.7	50.0	21.4	25.0
2: Not very important (%)	.	8.3	7.1	12.5
1: Not at all important (%)	11.1	.	.	.
Total (N)	18	12	14	8

E3: NCSU prepares students to live and work in diverse society	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	2.5	2.8	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	35.3	9.1	15.4	25.0
3: Agree (%)	41.2	36.4	69.2	37.5
2: Disagree (%)	23.5	54.5	.	37.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	15.4	.
Total (N)	17	11	13	8

E4a: My dept recruits historically underrepresented students	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	3.1	3.0	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	33.3	18.2	21.4	20.0
3: Agree (%)	44.4	72.7	57.1	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	16.7	9.1	21.4	40.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.6	.	.	.
Total (N)	18	11	14	5

E4b: My dept retains historically underrepresented students	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.2	3.2	2.9	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	35.3	27.3	14.3	16.7
3: Agree (%)	52.9	63.6	64.3	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	11.8	9.1	14.3	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	7.1	.
Total (N)	17	11	14	6

E4c: My dept supports historically underrepresented students	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.4	3.1	2.9	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	47.1	18.2	14.3	20.0
3: Agree (%)	41.2	72.7	71.4	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	11.8	9.1	7.1	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	7.1	.
Total (N)	17	11	14	5

E4d: My dept recruits historically underrepresented faculty	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.2	3.3	2.7	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	50.0	50.0	7.1	20.0
3: Agree (%)	27.8	41.7	57.1	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	16.7	.	35.7	40.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.6	8.3	.	.
Total (N)	18	12	14	5

E4e: My dept retains historically underrepresented faculty	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.2	3.0	2.4	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	47.1	33.3	7.7	16.7
3: Agree (%)	29.4	41.7	38.5	16.7
2: Disagree (%)	23.5	16.7	38.5	66.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	8.3	15.4	.
Total (N)	17	12	13	6

E4f: My dept supports historically underrepresented faculty	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.4	3.1	2.8	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	52.9	27.3	16.7	20.0
3: Agree (%)	29.4	54.5	50.0	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	17.6	18.2	25.0	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	8.3	.
Total (N)	17	11	12	5

E5a: Dept environ accepting/respectful of age	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.6	3.6	3.4	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	66.7	58.3	50.0	37.5
3: Agree (%)	27.8	41.7	42.9	62.5
2: Disagree (%)	.	.	7.1	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.6	.	.	.
Total (N)	18	12	14	8

E5b: Dept environ accepting/respectful of disability status	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.7	3.6	3.5	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	70.6	62.5	60.0	50.0
3: Agree (%)	29.4	37.5	30.0	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	.	10.0	.
Total (N)	17	8	10	6

E5c: Dept environ accepting/respectful of gender	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.7	3.5	2.9	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	72.2	50.0	28.6	37.5
3: Agree (%)	22.2	50.0	50.0	62.5
2: Disagree (%)	5.6	.	7.1	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	14.3	.
Total (N)	18	12	14	8

E5d: Dept environ accepting/respectful of military status	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.9	3.5	3.4	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	90.0	66.7	50.0	50.0
3: Agree (%)	10.0	16.7	37.5	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	16.7	12.5	.
Total (N)	10	6	8	6

E5e: Dept environ accepting/respectful of nationality/ethnic origin	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.6	3.6	3.2	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	64.7	55.6	38.5	42.9
3: Agree (%)	35.3	44.4	46.2	57.1
2: Disagree (%)	.	.	15.4	.
Total (N)	17	9	13	7

E5f: Dept environ accepting/respectful of race and color	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.6	3.5	3.2	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	72.2	58.3	30.8	37.5
3: Agree (%)	16.7	33.3	53.8	62.5
2: Disagree (%)	5.6	8.3	15.4	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.6	.	.	.
Total (N)	18	12	13	8

E5g: Dept environ accepting/respectful of religion	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.5	3.8	3.2	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	62.5	77.8	38.5	37.5
3: Agree (%)	31.3	22.2	46.2	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	.	7.7	12.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.3	.	7.7	.
Total (N)	16	9	13	8

E5h: Dept environ accepting/respectful of sexual orientation	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.8	3.5	3.2	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	76.9	45.5	33.3	50.0
3: Agree (%)	23.1	54.5	50.0	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	.	16.7	.
Total (N)	13	11	12	6

E6a: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of age	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.8	3.7	3.5	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	82.4	66.7	50.0	57.1
3: Agree (%)	11.8	33.3	50.0	42.9
2: Disagree (%)	5.9	.	.	.
Total (N)	17	9	14	7

E6b: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of disability status	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.8	3.8	3.6	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	76.5	83.3	63.6	57.1
3: Agree (%)	23.5	16.7	36.4	42.9
Total (N)	17	6	11	7

E6c: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of gender	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.8	3.6	3.5	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	77.8	60.0	50.0	57.1
3: Agree (%)	22.2	40.0	50.0	42.9
Total (N)	18	10	14	7

E6d: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of military status	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.9	3.8	3.6	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	88.9	80.0	55.6	66.7
3: Agree (%)	11.1	20.0	44.4	33.3
Total (N)	9	5	9	6

E6e: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of national/ethnic origin	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.7	3.6	3.5	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	72.2	66.7	50.0	57.1
3: Agree (%)	27.8	22.2	50.0	42.9
2: Disagree (%)	.	11.1	.	.
Total (N)	18	9	14	7

E6f: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of race and color	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.7	3.6	3.5	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	72.2	60.0	50.0	57.1
3: Agree (%)	27.8	40.0	50.0	42.9
Total (N)	18	10	14	7

E6g: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of religion	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.8	3.5	3.5	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	80.0	62.5	50.0	57.1
3: Agree (%)	20.0	25.0	50.0	42.9
2: Disagree (%)	.	12.5	.	.
Total (N)	15	8	12	7

E6h: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of sexual orientation	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.8	3.4	3.4	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	84.6	55.6	50.0	66.7
3: Agree (%)	15.4	33.3	40.0	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	.	11.1	10.0	.
Total (N)	13	9	10	6

E7: Faculty diversity/multiculturalism enhancement of intellectual diversity in dept	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.2	2.8	2.9	3.4
4: A great deal (%)	41.2	16.7	21.4	42.9
3: Some (%)	47.1	50.0	57.1	57.1
2: A little (%)	5.9	33.3	14.3	.
1: Not at all (%)	5.9	.	7.1	.
Total (N)	17	12	14	7

E8: Inclusion of diversity-related topics, scholarship, etc in your courses	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.4	3.1	3.5	2.9
4: A great deal (%)	47.1	16.7	64.3	12.5
3: Some (%)	47.1	75.0	21.4	75.0
2: A little (%)	.	8.3	14.3	.
1: Not at all (%)	5.9	.	.	12.5
Total (N)	17	12	14	8

E9a: Interest in research, extension, art endeavors outside U.S.	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	3.2	3.1	2.6
4: A great deal (%)	38.9	33.3	42.9	25.0
3: Some (%)	38.9	50.0	35.7	37.5
2: A little (%)	11.1	16.7	14.3	12.5
1: None (%)	11.1	.	7.1	25.0
Total (N)	18	12	14	8

E9b: Interest in teaching study abroad	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.6	2.8	2.9	2.6
4: A great deal (%)	22.2	25.0	42.9	37.5
3: Some (%)	33.3	41.7	21.4	12.5
2: A little (%)	22.2	16.7	21.4	25.0
1: None (%)	22.2	16.7	14.3	25.0
Total (N)	18	12	14	8

E9c: Interest in participating in spring break service learning	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	1.6	1.8	2.6	2.4
4: A great deal (%)	.	.	28.6	12.5
3: Some (%)	11.1	16.7	28.6	37.5
2: A little (%)	38.9	41.7	21.4	25.0
1: None (%)	50.0	41.7	21.4	25.0
Total (N)	18	12	14	8

E9d: Interest in participating in international service projects	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.5	2.4	2.9	2.8
4: A great deal (%)	22.2	16.7	42.9	12.5
3: Some (%)	27.8	33.3	14.3	62.5
2: A little (%)	27.8	25.0	35.7	12.5
1: None (%)	22.2	25.0	7.1	12.5
Total (N)	18	12	14	8

E9e: Interest in teaching in international studies major	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	1.5	1.9	2.1	1.6
4: A great deal (%)	.	16.7	21.4	12.5
3: Some (%)	22.2	8.3	14.3	.
2: A little (%)	5.6	25.0	21.4	25.0
1: None (%)	72.2	50.0	42.9	62.5
Total (N)	18	12	14	8

E9f: Interest in advising international students	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.6	2.7	2.7	2.1
4: A great deal (%)	17.6	8.3	28.6	25.0
3: Some (%)	47.1	66.7	28.6	12.5
2: A little (%)	17.6	8.3	28.6	12.5
1: None (%)	17.6	16.7	14.3	50.0
Total (N)	17	12	14	8

Back to Top

Section F: Working Relationships

F1: There is unity/cohesion among faculty in my department	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9	2.7	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	33.3	16.7	21.4	12.5
3: Agree (%)	38.9	58.3	42.9	87.5
2: Disagree (%)	22.2	25.0	21.4	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.6	.	14.3	.
Total (N)	18	12	14	8

F2a: Good communication between my students and me	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.6	3.4	3.6	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	61.1	41.7	57.1	62.5
3: Agree (%)	38.9	58.3	42.9	37.5
Total (N)	18	12	14	8

F2b: Good communication between dept and our students	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.6	3.0	2.8	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	61.1	16.7	.	12.5
3: Agree (%)	38.9	66.7	85.7	87.5
2: Disagree (%)	.	16.7	7.1	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	7.1	.
Total (N)	18	12	14	8

F2c: Good communication between faculty in my dept	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.2	2.9	2.9	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	33.3	8.3	21.4	42.9
3: Agree (%)	55.6	75.0	57.1	57.1
2: Disagree (%)	5.6	16.7	14.3	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.6	.	7.1	.
Total (N)	18	12	14	7

F2d: Good communication between my dept and other depts	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	2.5	2.3	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	11.8	9.1	.	28.6
3: Agree (%)	70.6	45.5	46.2	42.9
2: Disagree (%)	17.6	36.4	38.5	28.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	9.1	15.4	.
Total (N)	17	11	13	7

F2e: Good communication between my college and other colleges	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	2.6	2.3	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	9.1	11.1	.	.
3: Agree (%)	72.7	44.4	41.7	75.0
2: Disagree (%)	18.2	33.3	41.7	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	11.1	16.7	.
Total (N)	11	9	12	4

F3: Dept environ promotes respectful dialogue between diverse perspectives	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.2	3.1	2.9	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	44.4	8.3	14.3	50.0
3: Agree (%)	38.9	91.7	57.1	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	11.1	.	28.6	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.6	.	.	.
Total (N)	18	12	14	8

F4a: Frequency given/recvd teaching advice in dept past few years	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.3	3.0	2.9	3.5
Frequently (%)	50.0	33.3	35.7	62.5
Sometimes (%)	38.9	41.7	35.7	25.0
Seldom (%)	5.6	16.7	14.3	12.5
Never (%)	5.6	8.3	14.3	.
Total (N)	18	12	14	8

F4b: Frequency given/recvd research/artistic feedback in dept past few yrs	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.4	3.2	2.7	2.6
Frequently (%)	50.0	33.3	35.7	12.5
Sometimes (%)	44.4	50.0	14.3	50.0
Seldom (%)	5.6	16.7	35.7	25.0
Never (%)	.	.	14.3	12.5
Total (N)	18	12	14	8

F4c: Frequency given/recvd help with dept/college bureaucracy past few yrs	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.8	2.9	2.9	3.0
Frequently (%)	77.8	33.3	35.7	37.5
Sometimes (%)	22.2	33.3	28.6	25.0
Seldom (%)	.	25.0	21.4	37.5
Never (%)	.	8.3	14.3	.
Total (N)	18	12	14	8

F4d: Frequency given/recvd help undrsnd reappointment, promotion, tenure past few yrs	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.8	2.8	2.9	2.3
Frequently (%)	88.9	16.7	28.6	12.5
Sometimes (%)	5.6	50.0	35.7	25.0
Seldom (%)	5.6	25.0	28.6	37.5
Never (%)	.	8.3	7.1	25.0
Total (N)	18	12	14	8

F4e: Frequency given/recvd help with work/personal balance issues past few yrs	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	2.3	2.2	2.1
Frequently (%)	33.3	16.7	14.3	.
Sometimes (%)	44.4	8.3	28.6	25.0
Seldom (%)	11.1	66.7	21.4	62.5
Never (%)	11.1	8.3	35.7	12.5
Total (N)	18	12	14	8

F5a: Frequency of collab with faculty in your dept	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.5	3.4	3.2	3.0
Frequently (%)	55.6	58.3	28.6	37.5
Sometimes (%)	38.9	25.0	64.3	25.0
Seldom (%)	5.6	16.7	7.1	37.5
Total (N)	18	12	14	8

F5b: Frequency of collab with faculty in other NCSU depts	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9	2.5	1.6
Frequently (%)	33.3	33.3	7.1	.
Sometimes (%)	27.8	33.3	57.1	25.0
Seldom (%)	22.2	25.0	14.3	12.5
Never (%)	16.7	8.3	21.4	62.5
Total (N)	18	12	14	8

F5c: Frequency of collab with faculty from other universities	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.5	3.4	3.4	1.6
Frequently (%)	50.0	50.0	50.0	.
Sometimes (%)	50.0	41.7	35.7	25.0
Seldom (%)	.	8.3	14.3	12.5
Never (%)	.	.	.	62.5
Total (N)	18	12	14	8

F5d: Frequency of collab with non-faculty external to NCSU	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9	2.5	2.1
Frequently (%)	27.8	25.0	21.4	14.3
Sometimes (%)	50.0	50.0	21.4	28.6
Seldom (%)	16.7	16.7	42.9	14.3
Never (%)	5.6	8.3	14.3	42.9
Total (N)	18	12	14	7

Back to Top

Section G: Faculty Support & Professional Development

G1a: Satisfaction with level of courses	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.6	3.3	3.3	3.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	62.5	33.3	42.9	37.5
3: Satisfied (%)	31.3	66.7	42.9	62.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	6.3	.	14.3	.
Total (N)	16	12	14	8

G1b: Satisfaction with number of courses	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.5	3.2	3.2	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	58.8	33.3	28.6	25.0
3: Satisfied (%)	35.3	50.0	64.3	75.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	5.9	16.7	7.1	.
Total (N)	17	12	14	8

G1c: Satisfaction with choice in courses	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.7	3.4	3.3	3.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	70.6	41.7	57.1	62.5
3: Satisfied (%)	29.4	58.3	21.4	25.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	.	14.3	12.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	.	7.1	.
Total (N)	17	12	14	8

G1d: Satisfaction with course content discretion	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.9	3.3	3.4	3.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	88.2	33.3	64.3	62.5
3: Satisfied (%)	11.8	66.7	14.3	37.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	.	21.4	.
Total (N)	17	12	14	8

G1e: Satisfaction with number of students	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.7	3.0	3.4	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	70.6	25.0	50.0	37.5
3: Satisfied (%)	29.4	58.3	35.7	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	8.3	14.3	12.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	8.3	.	.
Total (N)	17	12	14	8

G1f: Satisfaction with quality of undergraduates	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.4	2.9	2.6	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	50.0	14.3	20.0	.
3: Satisfied (%)	40.0	57.1	20.0	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	10.0	28.6	60.0	.
Total (N)	10	7	5	5

G1g: Satisfaction with quality of graduate students	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.3	3.0	2.6	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	38.9	16.7	7.1	33.3
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	66.7	50.0	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	11.1	16.7	35.7	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	.	7.1	.
Total (N)	18	12	14	6

G1h: Satisfaction with access to grad TAs	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.2	2.0	1.7	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	14.3	.	.	50.0
3: Satisfied (%)	14.3	27.3	7.1	.
2: Dissatisfied (%)	50.0	45.5	57.1	50.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	21.4	27.3	35.7	.
Total (N)	14	11	14	2

G1i: Satisfaction with access to grad RAs	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.3	2.1	1.5	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	11.1	.	.	33.3
3: Satisfied (%)	27.8	33.3	.	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	38.9	41.7	50.0	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	22.2	25.0	50.0	.
Total (N)	18	12	14	3

G2a: NCSU supports innovative teaching	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.4	2.9	3.1	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	50.0	25.0	28.6	42.9
3: Agree (%)	44.4	41.7	64.3	57.1
2: Disagree (%)	5.6	33.3	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	7.1	.
Total (N)	18	12	14	7

G2b: NCSU supports innovative research and scholarly activity	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.5	3.2	3.4	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	55.6	33.3	50.0	.
3: Agree (%)	38.9	50.0	42.9	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	5.6	16.7	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	7.1	.
Total (N)	18	12	14	5

G2c: NCSU supports innovative creative artistry and literature	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.8	1.8	3.4	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	75.0	.	60.0	.
3: Agree (%)	25.0	.	20.0	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	83.3	20.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	16.7	.	.
Total (N)	4	6	5	2

G2d: NCSU supports innovative extension/engagement/econ dev activity	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.4	3.2	2.9	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	43.8	36.4	27.3	16.7
3: Agree (%)	50.0	45.5	54.5	83.3
2: Disagree (%)	6.3	18.2	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	18.2	.
Total (N)	16	11	11	6

G3a: NCSU rewards innovative teaching	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	2.6	2.4	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	29.4	.	7.7	20.0
3: Agree (%)	47.1	72.7	46.2	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	23.5	18.2	23.1	40.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	9.1	23.1	.
Total (N)	17	11	13	5

G3b: NCSU rewards innovative research and scholarly activity	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.7	3.5	3.2	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	66.7	45.5	23.1	40.0
3: Agree (%)	33.3	54.5	76.9	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	.	.	20.0
Total (N)	18	11	13	5

G3c: NCSU rewards innovative creative artistry and literature	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.4	1.7	3.0	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	60.0	.	20.0	.
3: Agree (%)	20.0	.	60.0	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	20.0	66.7	20.0	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	33.3	.	.
Total (N)	5	3	5	2

G3d: NCSU rewards innovative extension/engagement/econ dev activity	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0	2.4	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	23.5	.	10.0	.
3: Agree (%)	47.1	100.0	40.0	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	29.4	.	30.0	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	20.0	.
Total (N)	17	6	10	3

G4a: Satisfaction: Availability of classroom technology	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	2.7	2.5	3.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	29.4	25.0	.	62.5
3: Satisfied (%)	52.9	33.3	53.8	25.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	17.6	25.0	38.5	12.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	16.7	7.7	.
Total (N)	17	12	13	8

G4b: Satisfaction: Teaching reduction for scholarly/prof growth	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.1	2.4	2.5	3.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.3	.	15.4	40.0
3: Satisfied (%)	25.0	50.0	53.8	60.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	43.8	40.0	.	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	25.0	10.0	30.8	.
Total (N)	16	10	13	5

G4c: Satisfaction: Teaching workshop/seminar opportunities	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.4	2.8	3.0	3.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	41.2	18.2	16.7	50.0
3: Satisfied (%)	58.8	54.5	75.0	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	18.2	.	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	9.1	8.3	.
Total (N)	17	11	12	8

G4d: Satisfaction: Avail of funds to attend teaching conference/wrkshp	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.3	2.0	2.3	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	8.3	.	33.3
3: Satisfied (%)	40.0	8.3	46.2	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	46.7	58.3	38.5	16.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	13.3	25.0	15.4	16.7
Total (N)	15	12	13	6

G4e: Satisfaction: Learning technology training/support	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.3	2.8	2.9	3.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	38.9	16.7	28.6	37.5
3: Satisfied (%)	55.6	50.0	42.9	62.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	5.6	25.0	21.4	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	8.3	7.1	.
Total (N)	18	12	14	8

G4f: Satisfaction: Campus bookstore meeting course needs	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0	2.9	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	16.7	33.3	15.4	25.0
3: Satisfied (%)	72.2	44.4	69.2	62.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	5.6	11.1	7.7	12.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.6	11.1	7.7	.
Total (N)	18	9	13	8

G4g: Satisfaction: Availability of funds to present work	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.6	2.0	2.4	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	5.6	8.3	7.1	.
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	16.7	50.0	62.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	38.9	41.7	21.4	25.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.6	33.3	21.4	12.5
Total (N)	18	12	14	8

G4h: Satisfaction: Opportunities for scholarly/professional leave	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.0	1.8	2.3	2.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	.	10.0	.
3: Satisfied (%)	25.0	22.2	40.0	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	50.0	33.3	20.0	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	25.0	44.4	30.0	33.3
Total (N)	16	9	10	3

G4i: Satisfaction: Financial support for scholarly/professional leave	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.1	1.6	2.0	1.7
3: Satisfied (%)	31.3	12.5	36.4	.
2: Dissatisfied (%)	43.8	37.5	27.3	66.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	25.0	50.0	36.4	33.3
Total (N)	16	8	11	3

G4j: Satisfaction: Leadership development opportunities	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.5	2.5	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	14.3	10.0	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	60.0	60.0	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	35.7	.	30.0	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	30.0	10.0	.
Total (N)	14	10	10	4

G4k: Satisfaction: Support for dept assessment activities	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.4	1.9	2.2	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	10.0	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	46.7	20.0	36.4	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	46.7	20.0	45.5	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.7	50.0	18.2	.
Total (N)	15	10	11	6

G4l: Satisfaction: Availability of/access to materials via NCSU Libraries	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.6	3.4	3.1	3.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	55.6	50.0	28.6	57.1
3: Satisfied (%)	44.4	41.7	57.1	42.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	8.3	14.3	.
Total (N)	18	12	14	7

G4m: Satisfaction: Support with dealing with student concerns	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9	2.8	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	12.5	20.0	7.7	28.6
3: Satisfied (%)	68.8	60.0	69.2	71.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	18.8	10.0	15.4	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	10.0	7.7	.
Total (N)	16	10	13	7

G4n: Satisfaction: Support for technology transfer	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	2.3	2.6	3.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	9.1	.	.	66.7
3: Satisfied (%)	81.8	50.0	57.1	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	9.1	33.3	42.9	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	16.7	.	.
Total (N)	11	6	7	3

G5: Assignment of formal mentor	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Yes (%)	.	16.7	21.4	25.0
No (%)	100.0	83.3	71.4	62.5
Don't know (%)	.	.	7.1	12.5
Total (N)	18	12	14	8

G6: Mentor helpfulness	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.0	2.0	3.5
4: Very helpful (%)	.	.	50.0
3: Somewhat helpful (%)	.	.	50.0
2: Not very helpful (%)	100.0	100.0	.
Total (N)	2	3	2

G7a: Satisfaction: Pre-award support from college for grant/contract	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.4	3.4	3.5	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	58.8	54.5	69.2	50.0
3: Satisfied (%)	29.4	36.4	15.4	.
2: Dissatisfied (%)	5.9	.	7.7	50.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.9	9.1	7.7	.
Total (N)	17	11	13	2

G7b: Satisfaction: Post-award support from college for grant/contract	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.2	2.4	2.7	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	53.3	11.1	30.0	50.0
3: Satisfied (%)	26.7	44.4	20.0	.
2: Dissatisfied (%)	6.7	22.2	40.0	50.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	13.3	22.2	10.0	.
Total (N)	15	9	10	2

G7c: Satisfaction: Pre-award University support for grant/contract	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.2	2.9	2.9	2.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	37.5	25.0	33.3	.
3: Satisfied (%)	43.8	50.0	33.3	.
2: Dissatisfied (%)	18.8	12.5	22.2	100.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	12.5	11.1	.
Total (N)	16	8	9	1

G7d: Satisfaction: Post-award University support for grant/contract	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	2.2	2.7	2.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	26.7	.	22.2	.
3: Satisfied (%)	40.0	33.3	33.3	.
2: Dissatisfied (%)	26.7	50.0	33.3	100.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.7	16.7	11.1	.
Total (N)	15	6	9	1

G7e: Satisfaction: Allocation of indirect grant costs to investigator	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.7	2.1	2.4	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	13.3	11.1	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	53.3	11.1	45.5	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	26.7	55.6	45.5	50.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.7	22.2	9.1	.
Total (N)	15	9	11	2

G7f: Satisfaction: Allocation of indirect grant costs to department	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.7	2.1	2.4	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	13.3	12.5	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	46.7	12.5	45.5	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	40.0	50.0	45.5	50.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	25.0	9.1	.
Total (N)	15	8	11	2

G7g: Satisfaction: PI control over indirect cost allocation	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.5	1.9	2.0	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	12.5	.	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	37.5	11.1	27.3	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	37.5	66.7	45.5	50.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	12.5	22.2	27.3	.
Total (N)	16	9	11	2

Back to Top

Section H: Performance Review, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure

H1: Faculty performance review standards are clearly stated	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.3	2.6	2.7	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	44.4	9.1	14.3	25.0
3: Agree (%)	44.4	54.5	50.0	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	11.1	27.3	28.6	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	9.1	7.1	.
Total (N)	18	11	14	4

H2: Faculty performance review procedures are clearly stated	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.6	2.5	2.8	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	61.1	18.2	14.3	25.0
3: Agree (%)	38.9	36.4	57.1	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	27.3	21.4	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	18.2	7.1	.
Total (N)	18	11	14	4

H3: SME is consistent with departmental vision	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.4	2.9	3.1	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	42.9	20.0	28.6	.
3: Agree (%)	50.0	60.0	57.1	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	7.1	10.0	7.1	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	10.0	7.1	.
Total (N)	14	10	14	3

H4: SME is consistent with departmental promotion standards	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.5	2.9	3.0	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	46.2	11.1	23.1	.
3: Agree (%)	53.8	77.8	61.5	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	.	7.7	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	11.1	7.7	.
Total (N)	13	9	13	2

H5a: Performance Review feedback appropriately based on SME	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.3	2.7	2.6	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	50.0	18.2	7.7	.
3: Agree (%)	35.7	45.5	61.5	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	7.1	27.3	15.4	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.1	9.1	15.4	.
Total (N)	14	11	13	3

H5b: Performance Review feedback helpful for professional Development	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	2.4	2.5	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	37.5	.	7.1	.
3: Agree (%)	37.5	54.5	50.0	80.0
2: Disagree (%)	25.0	27.3	28.6	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	18.2	14.3	.
Total (N)	16	11	14	5

H5c: Performance Review feedback corresponds with my perceptions of own performance	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.2	2.5	2.6	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	31.3	9.1	14.3	20.0
3: Agree (%)	56.3	54.5	50.0	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	12.5	9.1	21.4	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	27.3	14.3	.
Total (N)	16	11	14	5

H5d: Performance Review feedback helps understand relation to other faculty	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.0	2.4	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	18.8	.	14.3	20.0
3: Agree (%)	43.8	27.3	28.6	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	37.5	45.5	35.7	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	27.3	21.4	.
Total (N)	16	11	14	5

H5e: Feedback given appropriate weight in merit raises	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.6	2.8	2.8	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	12.5	27.3	21.4	20.0
3: Agree (%)	50.0	45.5	50.0	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	18.8	9.1	14.3	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	18.8	18.2	14.3	.
Total (N)	16	11	14	5

H6: Understanding of current Academic Tenure Policy	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.4	2.8	2.8	2.0
4: Very well (%)	55.6	36.4	14.3	.
3: Fairly well (%)	27.8	9.1	57.1	14.3
2: Not very well (%)	16.7	54.5	21.4	71.4
1: Not at all (%)	.	.	7.1	14.3
Total (N)	18	11	14	7

H7_1: Participated in RPT process as candidate	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
No (%)	33.3	36.4	57.1	100.0
Yes (%)	66.7	63.6	42.9	.
Total (N)	18	11	14	8

H7_2: Participated in RPT process as voter	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
No (%)	.	18.2	100.0	100.0
Yes (%)	100.0	81.8	.	.
Total (N)	18	11	14	8

H7_3: Participated in RPT process as review committee member	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
No (%)	11.1	54.5	100.0	100.0
Yes (%)	88.9	45.5	.	.
Total (N)	18	11	14	8

H7_4: Have never participated in RPT process	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
No (%)	94.4	100.0	42.9	.
Yes (%)	5.6	.	57.1	100.0
Total (N)	18	11	14	8

H8: Understand dept RPT standards	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.7	2.9	2.6	2.0
4: Very well (%)	72.2	36.4	7.1	.
3: Fairly well (%)	27.8	18.2	50.0	28.6
2: Not very well (%)	.	45.5	35.7	42.9
1: Not at all (%)	.	.	7.1	28.6
Total (N)	18	11	14	7

H9: Understand dept RPT procedures	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.8	2.9	2.8	2.0
4: Very well (%)	77.8	36.4	14.3	.
3: Fairly well (%)	22.2	18.2	57.1	28.6
2: Not very well (%)	.	45.5	21.4	42.9
1: Not at all (%)	.	.	7.1	28.6
Total (N)	18	11	14	7

H10: Departmental RPT standards applied consistently/fairly	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.3	2.7	2.3	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	50.0	22.2	11.1	.
3: Agree (%)	27.8	44.4	33.3	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	22.2	11.1	33.3	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	22.2	22.2	33.3
Total (N)	18	9	9	3

H11: Departmental RPT procedures applied consistently/fairly	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.6	3.0	3.0	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	61.1	33.3	25.0	.
3: Agree (%)	38.9	44.4	62.5	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	.	11.1	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	11.1	12.5	33.3
Total (N)	18	9	8	3

H12a: Sufficient resources for teaching/mentoring students	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	2.6	2.6	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	5.9	10.0	.	14.3
3: Agree (%)	94.1	50.0	57.1	85.7
2: Disagree (%)	.	30.0	42.9	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	10.0	.	.
Total (N)	17	10	14	7

H12b: Sufficient resources for discovery of knowledge	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.6	2.6	2.6	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	6.3	.	.	.
3: Agree (%)	50.0	70.0	69.2	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	43.8	20.0	23.1	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	10.0	7.7	.
Total (N)	16	10	13	5

H12c: Sufficient resources for creative artistry and literature	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.3	2.0	2.5	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	33.3	.	.	25.0
3: Agree (%)	66.7	20.0	66.7	75.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	60.0	16.7	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	20.0	16.7	.
Total (N)	3	5	6	4

H12d: Sufficient resources for tech/managerial innovation	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	2.6	2.6	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.0	11.1	.	40.0
3: Agree (%)	90.0	44.4	63.6	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	33.3	36.4	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	11.1	.	.
Total (N)	10	9	11	5

H12e: Sufficient resources for extension/engagement	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.7	2.8	2.7	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	7.1	25.0	.	16.7
3: Agree (%)	57.1	37.5	75.0	83.3
2: Disagree (%)	35.7	25.0	16.7	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	12.5	8.3	.
Total (N)	14	8	12	6

H12f: Sufficient resources for professional service	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.6	2.3	2.4	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	15.4	.	.	16.7
3: Agree (%)	38.5	50.0	50.0	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	38.5	30.0	42.9	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.7	20.0	7.1	.
Total (N)	13	10	14	6

H13a: Department rewards teaching/mentoring of students	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.2	2.5	2.5	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	33.3	.	7.1	.
3: Agree (%)	55.6	60.0	42.9	80.0
2: Disagree (%)	11.1	30.0	42.9	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	10.0	7.1	.
Total (N)	18	10	14	5

H13b: Department rewards discovery of knowledge	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.4	3.1	2.9	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	55.6	25.0	28.6	20.0
3: Agree (%)	33.3	62.5	42.9	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	11.1	12.5	21.4	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	7.1	.
Total (N)	18	8	14	5

H13c: Department rewards creative artistry and literature	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.3	2.3	2.4	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	50.0	.	.	.
3: Agree (%)	25.0	33.3	60.0	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	25.0	66.7	20.0	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	20.0	.
Total (N)	4	3	5	4

H13d: Department rewards tech/managerial innovation	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	2.4	2.7	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	28.6	.	11.1	.
3: Agree (%)	57.1	40.0	44.4	75.0
2: Disagree (%)	14.3	60.0	44.4	25.0
Total (N)	7	5	9	4

H13e: Department rewards extension/engagement	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.7	2.4	2.5	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	13.3	.	7.7	.
3: Agree (%)	46.7	54.5	46.2	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	40.0	27.3	38.5	40.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	18.2	7.7	.
Total (N)	15	11	13	5

H13f: Department rewards professional service	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	2.2	2.4	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	31.3	.	7.1	.
3: Agree (%)	43.8	45.5	35.7	80.0
2: Disagree (%)	25.0	27.3	42.9	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	27.3	14.3	.
Total (N)	16	11	14	5

Back to Top

Section I: Post-Tenure Review

I1_1: No experience with PTR	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Has experience (%)	83.3	54.5	.	.
No experience (%)	16.7	45.5	100.0	100.0
Total (N)	18	11	14	5

I1_2: Have had PTR Comprehensive Review	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
No (%)	50.0	90.9	100.0	100.0
Yes (%)	50.0	9.1	.	.
Total (N)	18	11	14	5

I1_3: Have served on PTR committee	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
No (%)	44.4	54.5	100.0	100.0
Yes (%)	55.6	45.5	.	.
Total (N)	18	11	14	5

I1_4: Have been dept/college administrator in PTR process	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
No (%)	72.2	90.9	100.0	100.0
Yes (%)	27.8	9.1	.	.
Total (N)	18	11	14	5

I1_5: Had other PTR experience	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
No (%)	88.9	100.0	100.0	100.0
Yes (%)	11.1	.	.	.
Total (N)	18	11	14	5

I2a: Easy to find PTR information on NCSU website	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.6	2.2	2.0	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	5.9	.	.	.
3: Agree (%)	47.1	44.4	16.7	.
2: Disagree (%)	47.1	33.3	66.7	100.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	22.2	16.7	.
Total (N)	17	9	6	1

I2b: PTR process known/understood in department	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	1.9	1.8	1.8	2.0
3: Agree (%)	25.0	11.1	.	.
2: Disagree (%)	43.8	55.6	83.3	100.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	31.3	33.3	16.7	.
Total (N)	16	9	6	1

I2c: Departmental PTR procedures are clear	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.6	2.0	1.8	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	18.8	11.1	.	.
3: Agree (%)	31.3	11.1	.	.
2: Disagree (%)	37.5	44.4	80.0	100.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	12.5	33.3	20.0	.
Total (N)	16	9	5	1

I2d: Departmental PTR standards are clear	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.5	2.0	1.8	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	18.8	11.1	.	.
3: Agree (%)	31.3	11.1	.	.
2: Disagree (%)	31.3	44.4	83.3	100.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	18.8	33.3	16.7	.
Total (N)	16	9	6	1

I2e: Departmental PTR procedures are followed equitably	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	2.2	1.7	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	44.4	20.0	.	.
3: Agree (%)	33.3	20.0	.	.
2: Disagree (%)	11.1	20.0	66.7	100.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	11.1	40.0	33.3	.
Total (N)	9	5	3	1

I2f: Departmental PTR standards are applied fairly	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.3	2.3	1.7	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	44.4	16.7	.	.
3: Agree (%)	44.4	33.3	.	.
2: Disagree (%)	11.1	16.7	66.7	100.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	33.3	33.3	.
Total (N)	9	6	3	1

I2g: Dept PTR committee members are well prepared and trained	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	2.2	1.7	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	30.0	.	.	.
3: Agree (%)	40.0	33.3	.	.
2: Disagree (%)	20.0	50.0	66.7	100.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	10.0	16.7	33.3	.
Total (N)	10	6	3	1

I3: Overall satisfaction with PTR process	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.6	2.0	1.7	2.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	8.3	.	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	33.3	.	.
2: Dissatisfied (%)	33.3	33.3	66.7	100.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	8.3	33.3	33.3	.
Total (N)	12	6	3	1

Back to Top

Section J: Pay and Compensation

J1a: My salary is competitive within my department	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.7	2.9	3.1	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	14.3	27.3	33.3	20.0
3: Agree (%)	50.0	54.5	50.0	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	28.6	.	8.3	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.1	18.2	8.3	.
Total (N)	14	11	12	5

J1b: My salary is competitive within my college	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.5	2.6	2.9	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	7.7	11.1	22.2	20.0
3: Agree (%)	46.2	44.4	55.6	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	38.5	33.3	11.1	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.7	11.1	11.1	.
Total (N)	13	9	9	5

J1c: My salary is competitive within NC State	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	1.9	1.7	2.0	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	.	9.1	.
3: Agree (%)	16.7	10.0	9.1	.
2: Disagree (%)	58.3	50.0	54.5	100.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	25.0	40.0	27.3	.
Total (N)	12	10	11	3

J1d: My salary is competitive within UNC system	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.1	1.9	2.5	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	.	10.0	.
3: Agree (%)	37.5	25.0	50.0	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	37.5	37.5	20.0	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	25.0	37.5	20.0	.
Total (N)	8	8	10	3

J1e: My salary is competitive within discipline at comparable institutions	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.0	2.0	2.7	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	.	15.4	.
3: Agree (%)	25.0	20.0	53.8	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	50.0	60.0	15.4	66.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	25.0	20.0	15.4	.
Total (N)	12	10	13	3

J2: Understand how faculty salaries determined	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	2.5	2.4	2.3
4: Very well (%)	44.4	.	7.1	.
3: Fairly well (%)	33.3	63.6	50.0	37.5
2: Not very well (%)	11.1	27.3	14.3	50.0
1: Not at all (%)	11.1	9.1	28.6	12.5
Total (N)	18	11	14	8

J3: My department links salary increase to meritorious performance	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	2.8	3.2	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	27.8	20.0	50.0	14.3
3: Agree (%)	44.4	60.0	25.0	71.4
2: Disagree (%)	27.8	.	16.7	14.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	20.0	8.3	.
Total (N)	18	10	12	7

J4: I have access to benefits information	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.5	3.1	3.1	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	50.0	27.3	28.6	37.5
3: Agree (%)	50.0	54.5	57.1	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	18.2	14.3	12.5
Total (N)	18	11	14	8

J5: Healthcare benefits are competitive with other institutions	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.1	1.6	1.7	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	.	.	16.7
3: Agree (%)	40.0	22.2	14.3	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	33.3	11.1	42.9	16.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	26.7	66.7	42.9	.
Total (N)	15	9	14	6

J6: Retirement programs are competitive with other institutions	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.6	2.0	2.6	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	6.7	.	8.3	20.0
3: Agree (%)	60.0	37.5	50.0	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	20.0	25.0	33.3	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	13.3	37.5	8.3	.
Total (N)	15	8	12	5

J7: Voluntary benefits programs are competitive with other institutions	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.7	2.3	2.8	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	.	16.7	.
3: Agree (%)	72.7	50.0	50.0	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	27.3	25.0	25.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	25.0	8.3	.
Total (N)	11	8	12	6

J8: I am satisfied with my compensation at NC State	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.5	2.5	2.6	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	5.6	9.1	7.1	.
3: Agree (%)	44.4	36.4	50.0	75.0
2: Disagree (%)	44.4	45.5	35.7	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.6	9.1	7.1	.
Total (N)	18	11	14	8

J9: Departmental environment enables work/personal life balance	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	2.7	2.8	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	22.2	18.2	14.3	50.0
3: Agree (%)	61.1	54.5	57.1	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	16.7	9.1	21.4	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	18.2	7.1	.
Total (N)	18	11	14	8

J10: NCSU environment enables work/personal life balance	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	2.7	2.8	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	16.7	9.1	15.4	25.0
3: Agree (%)	72.2	63.6	53.8	75.0
2: Disagree (%)	11.1	18.2	23.1	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	9.1	7.7	.
Total (N)	18	11	13	8

J11a: Importance of flexible work hours	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.9	3.9	3.9	4.0
4: Very important (%)	94.4	90.9	92.9	100.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	5.6	9.1	7.1	.
Total (N)	18	11	14	8

J11b: Importance of maternity/paternity leave	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.8	3.8	4.0	3.4
4: Very important (%)	83.3	81.8	100.0	75.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	16.7	18.2	.	.
2: Not very important (%)	.	.	.	12.5
1: Not at all important (%)	.	.	.	12.5
Total (N)	18	11	14	8

J11c: Importance of family leave time	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.7	3.8	3.9	3.5
4: Very important (%)	70.6	81.8	85.7	75.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	29.4	18.2	14.3	12.5
1: Not at all important (%)	.	.	.	12.5
Total (N)	17	11	14	8

J11d: Importance of altering tenure clock for family concerns	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.6	3.8	4.0	3.9
4: Very important (%)	66.7	81.8	100.0	87.5
3: Somewhat important (%)	27.8	18.2	.	12.5
2: Not very important (%)	5.6	.	.	.
Total (N)	18	11	14	8

J11e: Importance of childcare facility on or near campus	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.4	3.6	3.9	3.4
4: Very important (%)	50.0	72.7	92.9	75.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	44.4	18.2	7.1	.
2: Not very important (%)	5.6	9.1	.	12.5
1: Not at all important (%)	.	.	.	12.5
Total (N)	18	11	14	8

J11f: Importance of tuition remission for dependents	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.6	3.8	3.9	3.5
4: Very important (%)	72.2	81.8	85.7	75.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	22.2	18.2	14.3	12.5
1: Not at all important (%)	5.6	.	.	12.5
Total (N)	18	11	14	8

Back to Top

Section K: Campus Infrastructure/Physical Environment

K1: I have sufficient clerical/admin support in my dept	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	2.1	2.6	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	11.1	27.3	21.4	50.0
3: Agree (%)	72.2	.	21.4	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	11.1	27.3	50.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.6	45.5	7.1	.
Total (N)	18	11	14	8

K2: I have sufficient tech assistance	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	2.8	2.9	3.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	16.7	27.3	21.4	75.0
3: Agree (%)	66.7	45.5	57.1	25.0
2: Disagree (%)	16.7	9.1	14.3	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	18.2	7.1	.
Total (N)	18	11	14	8

K3: There is sufficient support staff in my college	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.3	3.0	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	18.2	21.4	62.5
3: Agree (%)	83.3	27.3	57.1	37.5
2: Disagree (%)	16.7	18.2	21.4	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	36.4	.	.
Total (N)	18	11	14	8

K4a: Satisfaction with office space	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.4	3.3	3.3	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	50.0	45.5	57.1	12.5
3: Satisfied (%)	44.4	45.5	28.6	75.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	5.6	.	.	12.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	9.1	14.3	.
Total (N)	18	11	14	8

K4b: Satisfaction with lab space	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.4	3.0	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	.	25.0	.
3: Satisfied (%)	75.0	60.0	50.0	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	25.0	20.0	25.0	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	20.0	.	.
Total (N)	4	5	4	2

K4c: Satisfaction with classrooms in which you teach	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.6	2.1	2.3	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	5.6	.	7.7	.
3: Satisfied (%)	61.1	36.4	30.8	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	22.2	36.4	46.2	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	11.1	27.3	15.4	.
Total (N)	18	11	13	6

K4d: Satisfaction with labs in which you teach	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.6	2.5	2.8	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	.	20.0	.
3: Satisfied (%)	57.1	66.7	40.0	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	42.9	16.7	40.0	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	16.7	.	.
Total (N)	7	6	5	2

K4e: Satisfaction with maintenance of building in which you work	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.6	2.4	2.6	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	11.1	9.1	7.1	14.3
3: Satisfied (%)	55.6	36.4	57.1	57.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	16.7	36.4	21.4	28.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	16.7	18.2	14.3	.
Total (N)	18	11	14	7

K4f: Satisfaction with infrastructure of bldgs in which you work	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.6	2.1	2.3	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	11.1	.	.	12.5
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	27.3	42.9	62.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	27.8	54.5	42.9	12.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	11.1	18.2	14.3	12.5
Total (N)	18	11	14	8

K4g: Satisfaction with availability of up-to-date equipment	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	2.6	2.7	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	23.5	18.2	7.1	25.0
3: Satisfied (%)	64.7	45.5	57.1	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	11.8	18.2	35.7	25.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	18.2	.	.
Total (N)	17	11	14	8

K4h: Satisfaction with availability of office supplies	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.2	3.4	3.1	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	22.2	36.4	28.6	25.0
3: Satisfied (%)	72.2	63.6	50.0	62.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	5.6	.	21.4	12.5
Total (N)	18	11	14	8

K4i: Satisfaction with availability of informal meeting space	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.1	1.8	2.0	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	.	7.1	12.5
3: Satisfied (%)	38.9	18.2	14.3	37.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	33.3	45.5	50.0	50.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	27.8	36.4	28.6	.
Total (N)	18	11	14	8

K4j: Satisfaction with dining options on campus	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.5	1.8	2.7	2.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	15.4	.	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	30.8	33.3	69.2	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	46.2	16.7	30.8	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	7.7	50.0	.	16.7
Total (N)	13	6	13	6

K4k: Satisfaction with availability of parking	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.6	2.4	1.9	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	11.1	9.1	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	44.4	36.4	28.6	62.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	33.3	36.4	35.7	25.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	11.1	18.2	35.7	12.5
Total (N)	18	11	14	8

K4l: Satisfaction with cost of parking	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.3	1.7	1.7	2.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	5.6	.	7.1	.
3: Satisfied (%)	33.3	9.1	7.1	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	44.4	54.5	35.7	25.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	16.7	36.4	50.0	25.0
Total (N)	18	11	14	8

K4m: Satisfaction with Wolfline	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0	2.7	3.0
3: Satisfied (%)	100.0	100.0	66.7	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	.	33.3	.
Total (N)	5	4	3	1

K4n: Satisfaction with commute between Centennial and main	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.5	2.0	2.7	3.0
3: Satisfied (%)	75.0	25.0	71.4	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	50.0	28.6	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	25.0	25.0	.	.
Total (N)	8	8	7	2

K4o: Satisfaction with campus safety	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8	2.6	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	11.1	.	9.1	.
3: Satisfied (%)	72.2	77.8	54.5	87.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	11.1	22.2	27.3	12.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.6	.	9.1	.
Total (N)	18	9	11	8

K4p: Satisfaction with campus aesthetics	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.3	2.5	2.4	2.8
3: Satisfied (%)	55.6	54.5	50.0	87.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	22.2	45.5	42.9	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	22.2	.	7.1	12.5
Total (N)	18	11	14	8

K4q: Satisfaction with upkeep of campus grounds	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	2.8	2.7	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	23.5	.	7.1	.
3: Satisfied (%)	64.7	81.8	64.3	87.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	18.2	21.4	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	11.8	.	7.1	12.5
Total (N)	17	11	14	8

K4r: Satisfaction with amount of green space	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.4	2.5	2.3	2.8
3: Satisfied (%)	55.6	54.5	50.0	87.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	33.3	45.5	28.6	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	11.1	.	21.4	12.5
Total (N)	18	11	14	8

K5a: Satisfaction with energy conservation	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.5	2.9	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	16.7	.	9.1	.
3: Satisfied (%)	58.3	62.5	72.7	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	16.7	25.0	18.2	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	8.3	12.5	.	.
Total (N)	12	8	11	6

K5b: Satisfaction with water conservation	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	2.4	2.9	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	25.0	.	9.1	.
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	57.1	72.7	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	12.5	28.6	18.2	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	12.5	14.3	.	.
Total (N)	8	7	11	4

K5c: Satisfaction with recycling efforts	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	3.1	2.9	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	31.3	30.0	7.7	.
3: Satisfied (%)	37.5	60.0	76.9	87.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	25.0	.	15.4	12.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.3	10.0	.	.
Total (N)	16	10	13	8

K5d: Satisfaction with alternative transportation	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	2.4	2.8	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	23.1	.	9.1	.
3: Satisfied (%)	61.5	55.6	72.7	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	15.4	33.3	9.1	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	11.1	9.1	.
Total (N)	13	9	11	7

K5e: Satisfaction with green building practices	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	2.7	2.7	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	20.0	16.7	11.1	.
3: Satisfied (%)	70.0	50.0	55.6	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	16.7	22.2	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	10.0	16.7	11.1	.
Total (N)	10	6	9	3

K5f: Satisfaction with use of recycled-content resources	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	2.8	2.9	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	30.0	16.7	11.1	.
3: Satisfied (%)	60.0	66.7	66.7	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	.	22.2	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	10.0	16.7	.	.
Total (N)	10	6	9	3

K6: Interest in hotel/conference center on Centennial Campus	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	3.3	3.2	2.6
4: A lot (%)	29.4	54.5	50.0	37.5
3: Some (%)	35.3	18.2	28.6	25.0
2: A little (%)	23.5	27.3	14.3	.
1: None at all (%)	11.8	.	7.1	37.5
Total (N)	17	11	14	8

K7: Likelihood of using conference center on Centennial Campus	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	3.1	3.3	2.5
4: Very likely (%)	22.2	36.4	50.0	37.5
3: Somewhat likely (%)	38.9	36.4	28.6	12.5
2: Not very likely (%)	33.3	27.3	21.4	12.5
1: Not at all likely (%)	5.6	.	.	37.5
Total (N)	18	11	14	8

Back to Top

Section L: Recreation/Wellness

L1: Satisfaction with recreation activities on campus	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9	2.7	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	11.8	9.1	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	70.6	72.7	78.6	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	11.8	18.2	14.3	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.9	.	7.1	.
Total (N)	17	11	14	8

L2: Satisfaction with cultural activities on campus	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	3.0	2.6	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	27.3	.	25.0
3: Satisfied (%)	83.3	45.5	64.3	62.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	11.1	27.3	35.7	12.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.6	.	.	.
Total (N)	18	11	14	8

L3a: Satisfaction with Carmichael Gymnasium	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0	2.2	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	10.0	33.3	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	80.0	33.3	60.0	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	10.0	33.3	.	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	.	40.0	.
Total (N)	10	3	5	6

L3b: Satisfaction with recreation space around campus	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	2.6	2.5	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	18.2	20.0	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	54.5	40.0	66.7	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	27.3	20.0	16.7	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	20.0	16.7	.
Total (N)	11	5	6	5

L3c: Satisfaction with organized Campus Recreation activities	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.5	3.3	2.4	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	12.5	33.3	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	37.5	66.7	37.5	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	37.5	.	62.5	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	12.5	.	.	.
Total (N)	8	3	8	4

L3d: Satisfaction with ARTS NC State programs	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.2	3.3	2.8	3.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	21.4	33.3	12.5	40.0
3: Satisfied (%)	78.6	66.7	50.0	60.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	.	37.5	.
Total (N)	14	6	8	5

L3e: Satisfaction with Wolfpack athletic events	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0	3.0	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	15.4	25.0	16.7	14.3
3: Satisfied (%)	69.2	62.5	66.7	85.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	15.4	.	16.7	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	12.5	.	.
Total (N)	13	8	12	7

L4a: How often use Carmichael Gymnasium	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.5	2.0	1.6	2.8
Once a week or more (%)	16.7	9.1	7.1	12.5
A few times a month (%)	11.1	.	.	.
A few times a semester (%)	.	9.1	7.1	25.0
Once a semester (%)	.	.	.	12.5
Once a year (%)	22.2	27.3	7.1	12.5
Never (%)	50.0	54.5	78.6	37.5
Total (N)	18	11	14	8

L4b: How often use recreational space around campus	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.3	1.8	2.1	2.1
Once a week or more (%)	5.9	.	.	.
A few times a month (%)	11.8	.	7.1	.
A few times a semester (%)	5.9	27.3	14.3	12.5
Once a semester (%)	11.8	.	14.3	25.0
Once a year (%)	11.8	.	7.1	25.0
Never (%)	52.9	72.7	57.1	37.5
Total (N)	17	11	14	8

L4c: How often participate in organized Campus Recreation activities	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	1.6	1.5	1.4	1.9
A few times a month (%)	11.1	.	.	12.5
A few times a semester (%)	.	9.1	7.7	.
Once a semester (%)	5.6	9.1	.	12.5
Once a year (%)	.	.	15.4	12.5
Never (%)	83.3	81.8	76.9	62.5
Total (N)	18	11	13	8

L4d: How often attend ARTS NC State programs	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	2.6	2.6	2.8
A few times a month (%)	.	9.1	7.1	.
A few times a semester (%)	38.9	27.3	28.6	25.0
Once a semester (%)	33.3	18.2	14.3	50.0
Once a year (%)	22.2	9.1	14.3	.
Never (%)	5.6	36.4	35.7	25.0
Total (N)	18	11	14	8

L4e: How often attend Wolfpack athletic events	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.7	3.2	3.4	2.4
Once a week or more (%)	5.6	9.1	7.1	.
A few times a month (%)	11.1	18.2	21.4	.
A few times a semester (%)	22.2	18.2	28.6	25.0
Once a semester (%)	5.6	18.2	7.1	12.5
Once a year (%)	16.7	9.1	14.3	37.5
Never (%)	38.9	27.3	21.4	25.0
Total (N)	18	11	14	8

L5: Interest in designated faculty-only dining facility	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.5	3.1	2.8	2.6
4: A great deal (%)	22.2	45.5	42.9	37.5
3: Some (%)	38.9	27.3	21.4	25.0
2: A little (%)	5.6	18.2	7.1	.
1: None at all (%)	33.3	9.1	28.6	37.5
Total (N)	18	11	14	8

L6: Likelihood of using gym on Centennial campus	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	1.8	1.8	2.0	2.4
4: Very likely (%)	5.9	9.1	7.1	25.0
3: Somewhat likely (%)	17.6	9.1	14.3	25.0
2: Not very likely (%)	29.4	36.4	50.0	12.5
1: Not at all likely (%)	47.1	45.5	28.6	37.5
Total (N)	17	11	14	8

Back to Top

Section M: Work Activities

M1: Total hours per week spent performing job-related work (collapsed)	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track
Mean # Hrs Work	56.2	56.5	56.1	46.4
more than 60 hrs (%)	22.2	27.3	21.4	.
51 to 60 hrs (%)	44.4	18.2	35.7	12.5
41 to 50 hrs (%)	27.8	54.5	28.6	62.5
40 hrs or less (%)	5.6	.	14.3	25.0
Total (N)	18	11	14	8

M2A: Proportion of total hours spent on teaching/mentoring	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track
Mean % of Time on Activity	23.3	34.5	38.6	63.9
more than 50% of time (%)	5.6	18.2	14.3	62.5
26% to 50% of time (%)	27.8	54.5	57.1	25.0
11% to 25% of time (%)	38.9	27.3	28.6	12.5
6% to 10% of time (%)	16.7	.	.	.
1% to 5% of time (%)	11.1	.	.	.
Total (N)	18	11	14	8

M2a_1r: Includes teaching (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track
No (%)	22.2	9.1	28.6	12.5
Yes (%)	77.8	90.9	71.4	87.5
Total (N)	18	11	14	8

M2a_2r: Includes professional development to improve teaching (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track
No (%)	55.6	36.4	71.4	25.0
Yes (%)	44.4	63.6	28.6	75.0
Total (N)	18	11	14	8

M2a_3r: Includes research projects with students (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track
No (%)	33.3	18.2	42.9	75.0
Yes (%)	66.7	81.8	57.1	25.0
Total (N)	18	11	14	8

M2a_4r: Includes supervising internships/field experiences (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track
No (%)	38.9	54.5	71.4	50.0
Yes (%)	61.1	45.5	28.6	50.0
Total (N)	18	11	14	8

M2a_5r: Includes student thesis/dissertation committee work (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track
No (%)	11.1	9.1	35.7	50.0
Yes (%)	88.9	90.9	64.3	50.0
Total (N)	18	11	14	8

M2B: Proportion of total hours spent advising students	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track
Mean % of Time on Activity	10.3	8.6	9.1	14.9
26% to 50% of time (%)	.	.	.	12.5
11% to 25% of time (%)	33.3	9.1	28.6	25.0
6% to 10% of time (%)	22.2	45.5	28.6	37.5
1% to 5% of time (%)	38.9	45.5	42.9	25.0
0% of time (%)	5.6