North Carolina State University
2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey:

Results for the College of Education
by Gender

To skip directly to a particular section, select the section below.

Section B: Image and Vision	Section I: Post-Tenure Review
Section C: Leadership	Section J: Pay and Compensation
Section D: Faculty-Administration Relationships	Section K: Campus Infrastructure/Physical Environment
Section E: Diversity/Multiculturalism	Section L: Recreation/Wellness
Section F: Working Relationships	Section M: Work Activities
Section G: Faculty Support & Professional Development	Section N: Conclusions/Overall Satisfaction
Section H: Performance Review, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure

To download a Microsoft Word version of this document, click here.

A2: Ever held an administrative position	Male	Female
..... No (%)	79.2	67.9
..... Yes (%)	20.8	32.1
Total (N)	24	28

Section B: Image and Vision

B1a: Department doing good job of recruiting faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	20.8	11.1
3: Agree (%)	62.5	74.1
2: Disagree (%)	12.5	11.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.2	3.7
Total (N)	24	27

B1b: Department creating culture where faculty can develop to full potential	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.0	14.8
3: Agree (%)	50.0	59.3
2: Disagree (%)	16.7	14.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.3	11.1
Total (N)	24	27

B1c: Department retaining most effective and productive faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	17.4	11.1
3: Agree (%)	52.2	55.6
2: Disagree (%)	21.7	25.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.7	7.4
Total (N)	23	27

B2a: Department national reputation for undergraduate educ	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.8
5: Very strong (%)	12.5	29.4
4: Strong (%)	31.3	29.4
3: Average (%)	43.8	35.3
2: Weak (%)	12.5	5.9
Total (N)	16	17

B2b: Department national reputation for graduate education	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.6
5: Very strong (%)	8.3	10.7
4: Strong (%)	37.5	42.9
3: Average (%)	45.8	42.9
2: Weak (%)	8.3	3.6
Total (N)	24	28

B2c: Department national reputation for research & scholarly activity	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.5
5: Very strong (%)	16.7	3.6
4: Strong (%)	25.0	42.9
3: Average (%)	45.8	50.0
2: Weak (%)	12.5	3.6
Total (N)	24	28

B2d: Department national reputation for creative artistry and literature	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	2.9
4: Strong (%)	33.3	12.5
3: Average (%)	41.7	62.5
2: Weak (%)	25.0	25.0
Total (N)	12	8

B2e: Department national reputation for tech & managerial innovation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.4
5: Very strong (%)	16.7	10.5
4: Strong (%)	38.9	47.4
3: Average (%)	22.2	21.1
2: Weak (%)	22.2	15.8
1: Very weak (%)	.	5.3
Total (N)	18	19

B2f: Department national reputation for extension & engagement	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.7
5: Very strong (%)	13.6	7.7
4: Strong (%)	27.3	57.7
3: Average (%)	54.5	30.8
2: Weak (%)	4.5	3.8
Total (N)	22	26

B2g: Department national reputation for contrib to econ Development	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.4
4: Strong (%)	17.6	45.5
3: Average (%)	58.8	45.5
2: Weak (%)	23.5	9.1
Total (N)	17	11

B3a: Grade undergraduate majors' ability to meet prog demands	Male	Female
Mean Rating	4.4	4.2
A (%)	47.1	35.3
B (%)	47.1	52.9
C (%)	5.9	11.8
Total (N)	17	17

B3b: Grade graduate student ability to meet prog demands	Male	Female
Mean Rating	4.2	4.1
A (%)	33.3	32.1
B (%)	54.2	50.0
C (%)	12.5	14.3
D (%)	.	3.6
Total (N)	24	28

B3c: Grade demonstrated professional ability of faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	4.3	4.3
A (%)	37.5	46.4
B (%)	54.2	39.3
C (%)	8.3	14.3
Total (N)	24	28

B3d: Grade professional achievement of faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	4.0	4.4
A (%)	25.0	42.9
B (%)	54.2	50.0
C (%)	20.8	7.1
Total (N)	24	28

B3e: Grade own demonstrated professional ability	Male	Female
Mean Rating	4.5	4.4
A (%)	52.2	46.4
B (%)	47.8	46.4
C (%)	.	7.1
Total (N)	23	28

B3f: Grade own professional achievement	Male	Female
Mean Rating	4.5	4.3
A (%)	47.8	39.3
B (%)	52.2	53.6
C (%)	.	7.1
Total (N)	23	28

B4: Department's vision for the future	Male	Female
Clear vision; actively working toward goals (%)	33.3	14.3
Vision with slow progress (%)	45.8	46.4
No clear vision (%)	20.8	39.3
Total (N)	24	28

B5: Agreement with department vision for future	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	31.6	29.4
3: Agree (%)	68.4	70.6
Total (N)	19	17

B6: College's vision for the future	Male	Female
Clear vision; actively working toward goals (%)	50.0	46.4
Vision with slow progress (%)	33.3	50.0
No clear vision (%)	16.7	3.6
Total (N)	24	28

B7a: Department change in next five years	Male	Female
Change for the better (%)	75.0	78.6
Change for the worse (%)	8.3	.
Not really change (%)	16.7	21.4
Total (N)	24	28

B7b: College change in next five years	Male	Female
Change for the better (%)	66.7	71.4
Change for the worse (%)	12.5	7.1
Not really change (%)	20.8	21.4
Total (N)	24	28

B7c: NC State change in next five years	Male	Female
Change for the better (%)	54.2	71.4
Change for the worse (%)	8.3	7.1
Not really change (%)	37.5	21.4
Total (N)	24	28

Section C: Leadership

C1a: Dept admin communication with faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.1
4: Excellent (%)	45.8	48.1
3: Good (%)	20.8	22.2
2: Fair (%)	20.8	18.5
1: Poor (%)	12.5	11.1
Total (N)	24	27

C1b: Dept admin seek faculty input for dept vision	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.1
4: Excellent (%)	37.5	46.4
3: Good (%)	25.0	17.9
2: Fair (%)	29.2	32.1
1: Poor (%)	8.3	3.6
Total (N)	24	28

C1c: Dept admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	45.8	46.4
3: Good (%)	20.8	17.9
2: Fair (%)	20.8	21.4
1: Poor (%)	12.5	14.3
Total (N)	24	28

C1d: Dept admin delegate dept responsibility to faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	33.3	44.4
3: Good (%)	41.7	22.2
2: Fair (%)	20.8	14.8
1: Poor (%)	4.2	18.5
Total (N)	24	27

C1e: Dept admin grant faculty autonomy	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.3
4: Excellent (%)	58.3	60.7
3: Good (%)	20.8	17.9
2: Fair (%)	12.5	7.1
1: Poor (%)	8.3	14.3
Total (N)	24	28

C1f: Dept admin set clear and explicit priorities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	25.0	14.8
3: Good (%)	33.3	40.7
2: Fair (%)	33.3	37.0
1: Poor (%)	8.3	7.4
Total (N)	24	27

C1g: Dept admin appreciate your contrib to mission	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.2
4: Excellent (%)	50.0	48.1
3: Good (%)	33.3	29.6
2: Fair (%)	4.2	14.8
1: Poor (%)	12.5	7.4
Total (N)	24	27

C1h: Dept admin conflict resolution	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.4
4: Excellent (%)	30.0	25.9
3: Good (%)	35.0	18.5
2: Fair (%)	25.0	29.6
1: Poor (%)	10.0	25.9
Total (N)	20	27

C1i: Dept admin provide necessary resources	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.2
4: Excellent (%)	37.5	40.7
3: Good (%)	50.0	40.7
2: Fair (%)	4.2	14.8
1: Poor (%)	8.3	3.7
Total (N)	24	27

C1j: Dept admin allocate resources fairly	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.3
4: Excellent (%)	56.5	52.0
3: Good (%)	26.1	32.0
2: Fair (%)	13.0	8.0
1: Poor (%)	4.3	8.0
Total (N)	23	25

C1k: Dept admin serve as advocate for dept to college	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.3
4: Excellent (%)	62.5	57.7
3: Good (%)	20.8	23.1
2: Fair (%)	4.2	11.5
1: Poor (%)	12.5	7.7
Total (N)	24	26

C1l: Dept admin support academic freedom	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.4
4: Excellent (%)	60.9	59.3
3: Good (%)	26.1	25.9
2: Fair (%)	4.3	11.1
1: Poor (%)	8.7	3.7
Total (N)	23	27

C1m: Dept admin make rational decisions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	50.0	44.4
3: Good (%)	33.3	22.2
2: Fair (%)	8.3	22.2
1: Poor (%)	8.3	11.1
Total (N)	24	27

C1n: Dept admin make equitable decisions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.3
4: Excellent (%)	50.0	48.1
3: Good (%)	37.5	33.3
2: Fair (%)	4.2	14.8
1: Poor (%)	8.3	3.7
Total (N)	24	27

C1o: Dept admin promote diversity within dept	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	47.8	29.6
3: Good (%)	34.8	40.7
2: Fair (%)	8.7	25.9
1: Poor (%)	8.7	3.7
Total (N)	23	27

C2a: College admin communication with faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	4.2	3.8
3: Good (%)	54.2	65.4
2: Fair (%)	33.3	26.9
1: Poor (%)	8.3	3.8
Total (N)	24	26

C2b: College admin seek faculty input for vision	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	17.4	11.5
3: Good (%)	34.8	61.5
2: Fair (%)	34.8	19.2
1: Poor (%)	13.0	7.7
Total (N)	23	26

C2c: College admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.3
4: Excellent (%)	4.3	11.5
3: Good (%)	43.5	26.9
2: Fair (%)	30.4	46.2
1: Poor (%)	21.7	15.4
Total (N)	23	26

C2d: College admin grant departmental autonomy	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	22.7	18.5
3: Good (%)	36.4	51.9
2: Fair (%)	18.2	18.5
1: Poor (%)	22.7	11.1
Total (N)	22	27

C2e: College admin set clear and explicit priorities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.1
4: Excellent (%)	27.3	40.7
3: Good (%)	54.5	44.4
2: Fair (%)	13.6	3.7
1: Poor (%)	4.5	11.1
Total (N)	22	27

C2f: College admin appreciate your contrib to mission	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	21.7	33.3
3: Good (%)	26.1	33.3
2: Fair (%)	26.1	25.9
1: Poor (%)	26.1	7.4
Total (N)	23	27

C2g: College admin conflict resolution	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.4
4: Excellent (%)	10.5	5.3
3: Good (%)	42.1	42.1
2: Fair (%)	26.3	42.1
1: Poor (%)	21.1	10.5
Total (N)	19	19

C2h: College admin provide necessary resources	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	12.5	14.8
3: Good (%)	54.2	55.6
2: Fair (%)	25.0	29.6
1: Poor (%)	8.3	.
Total (N)	24	27

C2i: College admin allocate resources fairly	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	15.0	30.4
3: Good (%)	50.0	30.4
2: Fair (%)	25.0	21.7
1: Poor (%)	10.0	17.4
Total (N)	20	23

C2j: College admin serve as advocate for college to univ	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.5
4: Excellent (%)	56.5	54.2
3: Good (%)	21.7	41.7
2: Fair (%)	21.7	.
1: Poor (%)	.	4.2
Total (N)	23	24

C2k: College admin support academic freedom	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	3.2
4: Excellent (%)	30.4	32.0
3: Good (%)	26.1	56.0
2: Fair (%)	26.1	8.0
1: Poor (%)	17.4	4.0
Total (N)	23	25

C2l: College admin make rational decisions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	13.0	30.8
3: Good (%)	47.8	38.5
2: Fair (%)	30.4	23.1
1: Poor (%)	8.7	7.7
Total (N)	23	26

C2m: College admin make equitable decisions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	15.0	16.7
3: Good (%)	35.0	41.7
2: Fair (%)	40.0	25.0
1: Poor (%)	10.0	16.7
Total (N)	20	24

C2n: College admin promote diversity within college	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	40.9	18.5
3: Good (%)	22.7	33.3
2: Fair (%)	18.2	33.3
1: Poor (%)	18.2	14.8
Total (N)	22	27

C3a: Univ admin communication with faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.4
4: Excellent (%)	4.2	4.5
3: Good (%)	58.3	50.0
2: Fair (%)	29.2	27.3
1: Poor (%)	8.3	18.2
Total (N)	24	22

C3b: Univ admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.4
4: Excellent (%)	10.5	.
3: Good (%)	31.6	42.9
2: Fair (%)	42.1	50.0
1: Poor (%)	15.8	7.1
Total (N)	19	14

C3c: Univ admin set clear and explicit priorities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	13.0	12.0
3: Good (%)	52.2	56.0
2: Fair (%)	34.8	32.0
Total (N)	23	25

C3d: Univ admin serves as advocate for univ to constituents	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.2
4: Excellent (%)	38.1	33.3
3: Good (%)	47.6	58.3
2: Fair (%)	14.3	4.2
1: Poor (%)	.	4.2
Total (N)	21	24

C3e: Univ admin support academic freedom	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.1
4: Excellent (%)	23.8	40.0
3: Good (%)	42.9	32.0
2: Fair (%)	28.6	24.0
1: Poor (%)	4.8	4.0
Total (N)	21	25

C3f: Univ admin make rational decisions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	9.5	9.1
3: Good (%)	61.9	72.7
2: Fair (%)	28.6	18.2
Total (N)	21	22

C3g: Univ admin make equitable decisions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	15.0	.
3: Good (%)	50.0	72.2
2: Fair (%)	35.0	22.2
1: Poor (%)	.	5.6
Total (N)	20	18

C3h: Univ admin promote diversity within university	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	2.5
4: Excellent (%)	45.0	.
3: Good (%)	20.0	58.3
2: Fair (%)	30.0	33.3
1: Poor (%)	5.0	8.3
Total (N)	20	24

Section D: Faculty-Administration Relationships

D1a: I am encouraged to give input on curricular issues	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.7	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	66.7	78.6
3: Agree (%)	33.3	14.3
2: Disagree (%)	.	3.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	3.6
Total (N)	24	28

D1b: I am encouraged to give input on prog assessment	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	58.3	75.0
3: Agree (%)	37.5	21.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.2	3.6
Total (N)	24	28

D1c: I am encouraged to give input on dept hiring	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	54.2	71.4
3: Agree (%)	33.3	14.3
2: Disagree (%)	12.5	10.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	3.6
Total (N)	24	28

D1d: I am encouraged to give input on college admin appointments	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	8.3	33.3
3: Agree (%)	41.7	22.2
2: Disagree (%)	33.3	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	16.7	11.1
Total (N)	24	27

D1e: I am encouraged to give input on university admin appointments	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	8.3	29.6
3: Agree (%)	41.7	18.5
2: Disagree (%)	25.0	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	25.0	18.5
Total (N)	24	27

D2: Familiarity with academic program assessment in dept	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.6
4: Very familiar (%)	58.3	64.3
3: Somewhat familiar (%)	29.2	28.6
2: Not very familiar (%)	12.5	7.1
Total (N)	24	28

D3a: Understanding of resource allocation to university	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.3
4: Very well (%)	.	7.1
3: Fairly well (%)	37.5	28.6
2: Not very well (%)	62.5	50.0
1: Not at all (%)	.	14.3
Total (N)	24	28

D3b: Understanding of resource allocation to college	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.3
4: Very well (%)	4.2	3.6
3: Fairly well (%)	37.5	28.6
2: Not very well (%)	54.2	64.3
1: Not at all (%)	4.2	3.6
Total (N)	24	28

D3c: Understanding of resource allocation to department	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.6
4: Very well (%)	12.5	10.7
3: Fairly well (%)	37.5	39.3
2: Not very well (%)	45.8	46.4
1: Not at all (%)	4.2	3.6
Total (N)	24	28

D3d: Understanding of resource allocation within department	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8
4: Very well (%)	20.8	14.3
3: Fairly well (%)	37.5	53.6
2: Not very well (%)	37.5	25.0
1: Not at all (%)	4.2	7.1
Total (N)	24	28

D4: Faculty have sufficient input on dept resource allocation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	8.3	7.4
3: Agree (%)	50.0	55.6
2: Disagree (%)	33.3	25.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.3	11.1
Total (N)	24	27

D5: Dept faculty searches/appointments are collegial and inclusive	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	58.3	46.4
3: Agree (%)	33.3	42.9
2: Disagree (%)	8.3	3.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	7.1
Total (N)	24	28

D6a: Relations between faculty in dept and dept admin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.1
4: Excellent (%)	50.0	42.9
3: Good (%)	29.2	28.6
2: Fair (%)	16.7	25.0
1: Poor (%)	4.2	3.6
Total (N)	24	28

D6b: Relations between faculty in dept and college admin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.5
4: Excellent (%)	20.8	17.9
3: Good (%)	37.5	28.6
2: Fair (%)	29.2	42.9
1: Poor (%)	12.5	10.7
Total (N)	24	28

D6c: Relations between faculty in dept and univ admin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	6.3	11.8
3: Good (%)	56.3	52.9
2: Fair (%)	18.8	35.3
1: Poor (%)	18.8	.
Total (N)	16	17

D6d: Relations between all faculty and univ admin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	11.1	5.9
3: Good (%)	50.0	58.8
2: Fair (%)	22.2	29.4
1: Poor (%)	16.7	5.9
Total (N)	18	17

D7a: Faculty Senate effective commun between faculty and univ admin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.0	5.9
3: Agree (%)	60.0	76.5
2: Disagree (%)	25.0	11.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.0	5.9
Total (N)	20	17

D7b: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty in general	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	15.0	6.3
3: Agree (%)	45.0	68.8
2: Disagree (%)	30.0	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	10.0	.
Total (N)	20	16

D7c: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty like me	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.5	.
3: Agree (%)	42.1	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	31.6	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	15.8	.
Total (N)	19	12

D8: Effectiveness of university grievance procedures	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.5
4: Very effective (%)	.	25.0
3: Somewhat effective (%)	45.5	25.0
2: Not very effective (%)	54.5	25.0
1: Not at all effective (%)	.	25.0
Total (N)	11	8

D9: Importance of "ombuds" for informal conflict resolution	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	3.5
4: Very important (%)	62.5	50.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	33.3	46.4
2: Not very important (%)	4.2	3.6
Total (N)	24	28

Section E: Diversity/Multiculturalism

E1: Importance of institutional emphasis on diversity/multiculturalism	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.7
4: Very important (%)	50.0	67.9
3: Somewhat important (%)	33.3	32.1
2: Not very important (%)	12.5	.
1: Not at all important (%)	4.2	.
Total (N)	24	28

E2: Importance of diversity to enhanced learning in own classroom	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.8
4: Very important (%)	45.8	78.6
3: Somewhat important (%)	33.3	21.4
2: Not very important (%)	12.5	.
1: Not at all important (%)	8.3	.
Total (N)	24	28

E3: NCSU prepares students to live and work in diverse society	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	30.4	15.4
3: Agree (%)	47.8	46.2
2: Disagree (%)	21.7	30.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	7.7
Total (N)	23	26

E4a: My dept recruits historically underrepresented students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	30.4	20.0
3: Agree (%)	52.2	56.0
2: Disagree (%)	17.4	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	4.0
Total (N)	23	25

E4b: My dept retains historically underrepresented students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	30.4	20.0
3: Agree (%)	60.9	56.0
2: Disagree (%)	8.7	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	4.0
Total (N)	23	25

E4c: My dept supports historically underrepresented students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	34.8	20.8
3: Agree (%)	56.5	62.5
2: Disagree (%)	8.7	12.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	4.2
Total (N)	23	24

E4d: My dept recruits historically underrepresented faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	47.8	23.1
3: Agree (%)	30.4	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	21.7	19.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	7.7
Total (N)	23	26

E4e: My dept retains historically underrepresented faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	39.1	20.0
3: Agree (%)	30.4	36.0
2: Disagree (%)	21.7	40.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.7	4.0
Total (N)	23	25

E4f: My dept supports historically underrepresented faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	45.5	21.7
3: Agree (%)	36.4	52.2
2: Disagree (%)	13.6	26.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.5	.
Total (N)	22	23

E5a: Dept environ accepting/respectful of age	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	58.3	53.6
3: Agree (%)	37.5	42.9
2: Disagree (%)	.	3.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.2	.
Total (N)	24	28

E5b: Dept environ accepting/respectful of disability status	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	61.9	65.0
3: Agree (%)	33.3	35.0
2: Disagree (%)	4.8	.
Total (N)	21	20

E5c: Dept environ accepting/respectful of gender	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	58.3	42.9
3: Agree (%)	33.3	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	8.3	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	7.1
Total (N)	24	28

E5d: Dept environ accepting/respectful of military status	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	64.7	69.2
3: Agree (%)	23.5	30.8
2: Disagree (%)	11.8	.
Total (N)	17	13

E5e: Dept environ accepting/respectful of nationality/ethnic origin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	56.5	47.8
3: Agree (%)	39.1	47.8
2: Disagree (%)	4.3	4.3
Total (N)	23	23

E5f: Dept environ accepting/respectful of race and color	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	62.5	44.4
3: Agree (%)	25.0	48.1
2: Disagree (%)	8.3	7.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.2	.
Total (N)	24	27

E5g: Dept environ accepting/respectful of religion	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	63.2	48.1
3: Agree (%)	31.6	40.7
2: Disagree (%)	5.3	3.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	7.4
Total (N)	19	27

E5h: Dept environ accepting/respectful of sexual orientation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	52.4	52.4
3: Agree (%)	38.1	47.6
2: Disagree (%)	9.5	.
Total (N)	21	21

E6a: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of age	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	68.2	64.0
3: Agree (%)	27.3	36.0
2: Disagree (%)	4.5	.
Total (N)	22	25

E6b: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of disability status	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.7	3.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	66.7	75.0
3: Agree (%)	33.3	25.0
Total (N)	21	20

E6c: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of gender	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.7	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	65.2	61.5
3: Agree (%)	34.8	38.5
Total (N)	23	26

E6d: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of military status	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.7	3.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	70.6	75.0
3: Agree (%)	29.4	25.0
Total (N)	17	12

E6e: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of national/ethnic origin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	63.6	61.5
3: Agree (%)	36.4	34.6
2: Disagree (%)	.	3.8
Total (N)	22	26

E6f: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of race and color	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	60.9	61.5
3: Agree (%)	39.1	38.5
Total (N)	23	26

E6g: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of religion	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.7	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	66.7	62.5
3: Agree (%)	33.3	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	.	4.2
Total (N)	18	24

E6h: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of sexual orientation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.7	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	66.7	65.0
3: Agree (%)	33.3	25.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	10.0
Total (N)	18	20

E7: Faculty diversity/multiculturalism enhancement of intellectual diversity in dept	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	3.3
4: A great deal (%)	21.7	37.0
3: Some (%)	47.8	55.6
2: A little (%)	21.7	7.4
1: Not at all (%)	8.7	.
Total (N)	23	27

E8: Inclusion of diversity-related topics, scholarship, etc in your courses	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.4
4: A great deal (%)	29.2	48.1
3: Some (%)	54.2	48.1
2: A little (%)	8.3	3.7
1: Not at all (%)	8.3	.
Total (N)	24	27

E9a: Interest in research, extension, art endeavors outside U.S.	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.0
4: A great deal (%)	37.5	35.7
3: Some (%)	37.5	42.9
2: A little (%)	20.8	7.1
1: None (%)	4.2	14.3
Total (N)	24	28

E9b: Interest in teaching study abroad	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.8
4: A great deal (%)	25.0	35.7
3: Some (%)	37.5	21.4
2: A little (%)	16.7	25.0
1: None (%)	20.8	17.9
Total (N)	24	28

E9c: Interest in participating in spring break service learning	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.0	2.1
4: A great deal (%)	8.3	10.7
3: Some (%)	16.7	25.0
2: A little (%)	37.5	28.6
1: None (%)	37.5	35.7
Total (N)	24	28

E9d: Interest in participating in international service projects	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.8
4: A great deal (%)	20.8	28.6
3: Some (%)	25.0	35.7
2: A little (%)	33.3	21.4
1: None (%)	20.8	14.3
Total (N)	24	28

E9e: Interest in teaching in international studies major	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.9	1.7
4: A great deal (%)	16.7	7.1
3: Some (%)	12.5	14.3
2: A little (%)	12.5	21.4
1: None (%)	58.3	57.1
Total (N)	24	28

E9f: Interest in advising international students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.5
4: A great deal (%)	26.1	14.3
3: Some (%)	43.5	39.3
2: A little (%)	8.7	25.0
1: None (%)	21.7	21.4
Total (N)	23	28

Section F: Working Relationships

F1: There is unity/cohesion among faculty in my department	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.0	21.4
3: Agree (%)	50.0	53.6
2: Disagree (%)	25.0	14.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	10.7
Total (N)	24	28

F2a: Good communication between my students and me	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	41.7	67.9
3: Agree (%)	58.3	32.1
Total (N)	24	28

F2b: Good communication between dept and our students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.0	28.6
3: Agree (%)	66.7	64.3
2: Disagree (%)	8.3	3.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	3.6
Total (N)	24	28

F2c: Good communication between faculty in my dept	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.0	25.9
3: Agree (%)	66.7	55.6
2: Disagree (%)	8.3	11.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	7.4
Total (N)	24	27

F2d: Good communication between my dept and other depts	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	13.0	8.0
3: Agree (%)	52.2	56.0
2: Disagree (%)	26.1	32.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.7	4.0
Total (N)	23	25

F2e: Good communication between my college and other colleges	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	11.8
3: Agree (%)	47.4	64.7
2: Disagree (%)	42.1	17.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	10.5	5.9
Total (N)	19	17

F3: Dept environ promotes respectful dialogue between diverse perspectives	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	37.5	21.4
3: Agree (%)	54.2	60.7
2: Disagree (%)	8.3	14.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	3.6
Total (N)	24	28

F4a: Frequency given/recvd teaching advice in dept past few years	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.1
Frequently (%)	50.0	39.3
Sometimes (%)	33.3	39.3
Seldom (%)	8.3	14.3
Never (%)	8.3	7.1
Total (N)	24	28

F4b: Frequency given/recvd research/artistic feedback in dept past few yrs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	2.9
Frequently (%)	45.8	28.6
Sometimes (%)	41.7	35.7
Seldom (%)	8.3	28.6
Never (%)	4.2	7.1
Total (N)	24	28

F4c: Frequency given/recvd help with dept/college bureaucracy past few yrs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.1
Frequently (%)	50.0	50.0
Sometimes (%)	37.5	17.9
Seldom (%)	8.3	25.0
Never (%)	4.2	7.1
Total (N)	24	28

F4d: Frequency given/recvd help undrsnd reappointment, promotion, tenure past few yrs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.0
Frequently (%)	41.7	46.4
Sometimes (%)	37.5	17.9
Seldom (%)	20.8	21.4
Never (%)	.	14.3
Total (N)	24	28

F4e: Frequency given/recvd help with work/personal balance issues past few yrs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.6
Frequently (%)	16.7	21.4
Sometimes (%)	25.0	32.1
Seldom (%)	41.7	28.6
Never (%)	16.7	17.9
Total (N)	24	28

F5a: Frequency of collab with faculty in your dept	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.3
Frequently (%)	50.0	42.9
Sometimes (%)	33.3	46.4
Seldom (%)	16.7	10.7
Total (N)	24	28

F5b: Frequency of collab with faculty in other NCSU depts	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.7
Frequently (%)	20.8	21.4
Sometimes (%)	25.0	46.4
Seldom (%)	29.2	10.7
Never (%)	25.0	21.4
Total (N)	24	28

F5c: Frequency of collab with faculty from other universities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.1
Frequently (%)	45.8	39.3
Sometimes (%)	37.5	42.9
Seldom (%)	8.3	7.1
Never (%)	8.3	10.7
Total (N)	24	28

F5d: Frequency of collab with non-faculty external to NCSU	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.8
Frequently (%)	20.8	25.9
Sometimes (%)	37.5	40.7
Seldom (%)	29.2	18.5
Never (%)	12.5	14.8
Total (N)	24	27

Section G: Faculty Support & Professional Development

G1a: Satisfaction with level of courses	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	54.2	38.5
3: Satisfied (%)	45.8	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	11.5
Total (N)	24	26

G1b: Satisfaction with number of courses	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	37.5	40.7
3: Satisfied (%)	54.2	51.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	8.3	7.4
Total (N)	24	27

G1c: Satisfaction with choice in courses	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	45.8	70.4
3: Satisfied (%)	41.7	25.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	12.5	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	3.7
Total (N)	24	27

G1d: Satisfaction with course content discretion	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	62.5	66.7
3: Satisfied (%)	29.2	29.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	8.3	3.7
Total (N)	24	27

G1e: Satisfaction with number of students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	45.8	51.9
3: Satisfied (%)	45.8	37.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	4.2	11.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	4.2	.
Total (N)	24	27

G1f: Satisfaction with quality of undergraduates	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	23.1	28.6
3: Satisfied (%)	61.5	42.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	15.4	28.6
Total (N)	13	14

G1g: Satisfaction with quality of graduate students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	20.8	26.9
3: Satisfied (%)	62.5	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	16.7	19.2
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	3.8
Total (N)	24	26

G1h: Satisfaction with access to grad TAs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.2	1.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	10.0	4.8
3: Satisfied (%)	15.0	14.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	55.0	47.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	20.0	33.3
Total (N)	20	21

G1i: Satisfaction with access to grad RAs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.2	1.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	9.1	4.0
3: Satisfied (%)	22.7	20.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	45.5	40.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	22.7	36.0
Total (N)	22	25

G2a: NCSU supports innovative teaching	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	45.8	29.6
3: Agree (%)	41.7	59.3
2: Disagree (%)	8.3	11.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.2	.
Total (N)	24	27

G2b: NCSU supports innovative research and scholarly activity	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	47.8	38.5
3: Agree (%)	43.5	53.8
2: Disagree (%)	4.3	7.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.3	.
Total (N)	23	26

G2c: NCSU supports innovative creative artistry and literature	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	50.0	14.3
3: Agree (%)	10.0	42.9
2: Disagree (%)	30.0	42.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	10.0	.
Total (N)	10	7

G2d: NCSU supports innovative extension/engagement/econ dev activity	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	45.5	22.7
3: Agree (%)	40.9	68.2
2: Disagree (%)	9.1	4.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.5	4.5
Total (N)	22	22

G3a: NCSU rewards innovative teaching	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	13.0	17.4
3: Agree (%)	52.2	52.2
2: Disagree (%)	26.1	21.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.7	8.7
Total (N)	23	23

G3b: NCSU rewards innovative research and scholarly activity	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	43.5	50.0
3: Agree (%)	52.2	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	4.3	.
Total (N)	23	24

G3c: NCSU rewards innovative creative artistry and literature	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	33.3	16.7
3: Agree (%)	11.1	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	44.4	16.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	11.1	.
Total (N)	9	6

G3d: NCSU rewards innovative extension/engagement/econ dev activity	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.5	17.6
3: Agree (%)	57.9	52.9
2: Disagree (%)	26.3	23.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.3	5.9
Total (N)	19	17

G4a: Satisfaction: Availability of classroom technology	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	29.2	23.1
3: Satisfied (%)	54.2	34.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	8.3	38.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	8.3	3.8
Total (N)	24	26

G4b: Satisfaction: Teaching reduction for scholarly/prof growth	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	5.0	16.7
3: Satisfied (%)	45.0	41.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	30.0	20.8
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	20.0	20.8
Total (N)	20	24

G4c: Satisfaction: Teaching workshop/seminar opportunities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	25.0	37.5
3: Satisfied (%)	66.7	54.2
2: Dissatisfied (%)	8.3	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	8.3
Total (N)	24	24

G4d: Satisfaction: Avail of funds to attend teaching conference/wrkshp	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	4.3	8.7
3: Satisfied (%)	34.8	30.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	43.5	43.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	17.4	17.4
Total (N)	23	23

G4e: Satisfaction: Learning technology training/support	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	29.2	32.1
3: Satisfied (%)	58.3	46.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	4.2	21.4
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	8.3	.
Total (N)	24	28

G4f: Satisfaction: Campus bookstore meeting course needs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	17.4	24.0
3: Satisfied (%)	69.6	60.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	4.3	12.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	8.7	4.0
Total (N)	23	25

G4g: Satisfaction: Availability of funds to present work	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	4.2	7.1
3: Satisfied (%)	45.8	42.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	29.2	35.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	20.8	14.3
Total (N)	24	28

G4h: Satisfaction: Opportunities for scholarly/professional leave	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.8	2.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	4.8
3: Satisfied (%)	17.6	38.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	41.2	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	41.2	23.8
Total (N)	17	21

G4i: Satisfaction: Financial support for scholarly/professional leave	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.8	2.0
3: Satisfied (%)	23.5	28.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	29.4	47.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	47.1	23.8
Total (N)	17	21

G4j: Satisfaction: Leadership development opportunities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	5.6	10.0
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	70.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	27.8	15.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	16.7	5.0
Total (N)	18	20

G4k: Satisfaction: Support for dept assessment Activities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	4.5	.
3: Satisfied (%)	54.5	35.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	22.7	45.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	18.2	20.0
Total (N)	22	20

G4l: Satisfaction: Availability of/access to materials via NCSU Libraries	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	50.0	44.4
3: Satisfied (%)	45.8	48.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	4.2	7.4
Total (N)	24	27

G4m: Satisfaction: Support with dealing with student concerns	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	9.1	20.8
3: Satisfied (%)	72.7	62.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	13.6	12.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	4.5	4.2
Total (N)	22	24

G4n: Satisfaction: Support for technology transfer	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.7	16.7
3: Satisfied (%)	53.3	75.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	33.3	8.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.7	.
Total (N)	15	12

G5: Assignment of formal mentor	Male	Female
Yes (%)	8.3	17.9
No (%)	87.5	78.6
Don't know (%)	4.2	3.6
Total (N)	24	28

G6: Mentor helpfulness	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.2
4: Very helpful (%)	50.0	.
3: Somewhat helpful (%)	.	20.0
2: Not very helpful (%)	50.0	80.0
Total (N)	2	5

G7a: Satisfaction: Pre-award support from college for grant/contract	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	52.4	68.2
3: Satisfied (%)	33.3	18.2
2: Dissatisfied (%)	4.8	9.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	9.5	4.5
Total (N)	21	22

G7b: Satisfaction: Post-award support from college for grant/contract	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	29.4	42.1
3: Satisfied (%)	35.3	21.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	17.6	26.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	17.6	10.5
Total (N)	17	19

G7c: Satisfaction: Pre-award University support for grant/contract	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	23.5	41.2
3: Satisfied (%)	52.9	29.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	17.6	23.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.9	5.9
Total (N)	17	17

G7d: Satisfaction: Post-award University support for grant/contract	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	21.4	17.6
3: Satisfied (%)	42.9	29.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	28.6	41.2
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	7.1	11.8
Total (N)	14	17

G7e: Satisfaction: Allocation of indirect grant costs to investigator	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.3	9.5
3: Satisfied (%)	43.8	38.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	31.3	47.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	18.8	4.8
Total (N)	16	21

G7f: Satisfaction: Allocation of indirect grant costs to department	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.7	9.5
3: Satisfied (%)	40.0	38.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	40.0	47.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	13.3	4.8
Total (N)	15	21

G7g: Satisfaction: PI control over indirect cost allocation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.1	2.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	9.5
3: Satisfied (%)	35.3	23.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	35.3	57.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	29.4	9.5
Total (N)	17	21

Section H: Performance Review, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure

H1: Faculty performance review standards are clearly stated	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	21.7	29.2
3: Agree (%)	52.2	45.8
2: Disagree (%)	21.7	20.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.3	4.2
Total (N)	23	24

H2: Faculty performance review procedures are clearly stated	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	30.4	37.5
3: Agree (%)	47.8	41.7
2: Disagree (%)	17.4	12.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.3	8.3
Total (N)	23	24

H3: SME is consistent with departmental vision	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.0	33.3
3: Agree (%)	60.0	57.1
2: Disagree (%)	10.0	4.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.0	4.8
Total (N)	20	21

H4: SME is consistent with departmental promotion standards	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	15.0	41.2
3: Agree (%)	75.0	52.9
2: Disagree (%)	5.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.0	5.9
Total (N)	20	17

H5a: Performance Review feedback appropriately based on SME	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	33.3	15.0
3: Agree (%)	33.3	65.0
2: Disagree (%)	19.0	15.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	14.3	5.0
Total (N)	21	20

H5b: Performance Review feedback helpful for professional Development	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	17.4	13.0
3: Agree (%)	47.8	52.2
2: Disagree (%)	26.1	26.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.7	8.7
Total (N)	23	23

H5c: Performance Review feedback corresponds with my perceptions of own performance	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	21.7	17.4
3: Agree (%)	60.9	47.8
2: Disagree (%)	8.7	21.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.7	13.0
Total (N)	23	23

H5d: Performance Review feedback helps understand relation to other faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	13.0	13.0
3: Agree (%)	34.8	39.1
2: Disagree (%)	43.5	30.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.7	17.4
Total (N)	23	23

H5e: Feedback given appropriate weight in merit raises	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	21.7	17.4
3: Agree (%)	47.8	52.2
2: Disagree (%)	13.0	17.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	17.4	13.0
Total (N)	23	23

H6: Understanding of current Academic Tenure Policy	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	3.0
4: Very well (%)	37.5	26.9
3: Fairly well (%)	12.5	46.2
2: Not very well (%)	41.7	26.9
1: Not at all (%)	8.3	.
Total (N)	24	26

H7_1: Participated in RPT process as candidate	Male	Female
No (%)	54.2	48.1
Yes (%)	45.8	51.9
Total (N)	24	27

H7_2: Participated in RPT process as voter	Male	Female
No (%)	29.2	63.0
Yes (%)	70.8	37.0
Total (N)	24	27

H7_3: Participated in RPT process as review committee member	Male	Female
No (%)	41.7	74.1
Yes (%)	58.3	25.9
Total (N)	24	27

H7_4: Have never participated in RPT process	Male	Female
No (%)	70.8	63.0
Yes (%)	29.2	37.0
Total (N)	24	27

H8: Understand dept RPT standards	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0
4: Very well (%)	41.7	30.8
3: Fairly well (%)	29.2	34.6
2: Not very well (%)	16.7	34.6
1: Not at all (%)	12.5	.
Total (N)	24	26

H9: Understand dept RPT procedures	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.1
4: Very well (%)	45.8	34.6
3: Fairly well (%)	20.8	42.3
2: Not very well (%)	20.8	23.1
1: Not at all (%)	12.5	.
Total (N)	24	26

H10: Departmental RPT standards applied consistently/fairly	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	45.0	15.8
3: Agree (%)	30.0	42.1
2: Disagree (%)	10.0	31.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	15.0	10.5
Total (N)	20	19

H11: Departmental RPT procedures applied consistently/fairly	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	45.0	38.9
3: Agree (%)	40.0	55.6
2: Disagree (%)	5.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	10.0	5.6
Total (N)	20	18

H12a: Sufficient resources for teaching/mentoring students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	4.2	8.3
3: Agree (%)	79.2	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	16.7	20.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	4.2
Total (N)	24	24

H12b: Sufficient resources for discovery of knowledge	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	4.8
3: Agree (%)	69.6	61.9
2: Disagree (%)	30.4	23.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	9.5
Total (N)	23	21

H12c: Sufficient resources for creative artistry and literature	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	25.0
3: Agree (%)	70.0	37.5
2: Disagree (%)	30.0	12.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	25.0
Total (N)	10	8

H12d: Sufficient resources for tech/managerial innovation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.0	13.3
3: Agree (%)	70.0	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	20.0	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	6.7
Total (N)	20	15

H12e: Sufficient resources for extension/engagement	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	21.1	.
3: Agree (%)	52.6	71.4
2: Disagree (%)	26.3	19.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	9.5
Total (N)	19	21

H12f: Sufficient resources for professional service	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	8.3	5.3
3: Agree (%)	45.8	47.4
2: Disagree (%)	37.5	36.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.3	10.5
Total (N)	24	19

H13a: Department rewards teaching/mentoring of students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	9.1	20.0
3: Agree (%)	59.1	52.0
2: Disagree (%)	31.8	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	8.0
Total (N)	22	25

H13b: Department rewards discovery of knowledge	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	28.6	45.8
3: Agree (%)	47.6	41.7
2: Disagree (%)	23.8	8.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	4.2
Total (N)	21	24

H13c: Department rewards creative artistry and literature	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	11.1	14.3
3: Agree (%)	55.6	28.6
2: Disagree (%)	33.3	42.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	14.3
Total (N)	9	7

H13d: Department rewards tech/managerial innovation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	13.3	10.0
3: Agree (%)	46.7	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	40.0	30.0
Total (N)	15	10

H13e: Department rewards extension/engagement	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	5.0	8.3
3: Agree (%)	55.0	45.8
2: Disagree (%)	35.0	37.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.0	8.3
Total (N)	20	24

H13f: Department rewards professional service	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	8.7	17.4
3: Agree (%)	47.8	43.5
2: Disagree (%)	30.4	30.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	13.0	8.7
Total (N)	23	23

Section I: Post-Tenure Review

I1_1: No experience with PTR	Male	Female
Has experience (%)	62.5	25.0
No experience (%)	37.5	75.0
Total (N)	24	24

I1_2: Have had PTR Comprehensive Review	Male	Female
No (%)	62.5	95.8
Yes (%)	37.5	4.2
Total (N)	24	24

I1_3: Have served on PTR committee	Male	Female
No (%)	58.3	79.2
Yes (%)	41.7	20.8
Total (N)	24	24

I1_4: Have been dept/college administrator in PTR process	Male	Female
No (%)	83.3	91.7
Yes (%)	16.7	8.3
Total (N)	24	24

I1_5: Had other PTR experience	Male	Female
No (%)	91.7	100.0
Yes (%)	8.3	.
Total (N)	24	24

I2a: Easy to find PTR information on NCSU website	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	5.0	.
3: Agree (%)	40.0	38.5
2: Disagree (%)	45.0	53.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	10.0	7.7
Total (N)	20	13

I2b: PTR process known/understood in department	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.9	1.8
3: Agree (%)	21.1	7.7
2: Disagree (%)	47.4	69.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	31.6	23.1
Total (N)	19	13

I2c: Departmental PTR procedures are clear	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	16.7	7.7
3: Agree (%)	27.8	7.7
2: Disagree (%)	27.8	76.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	27.8	7.7
Total (N)	18	13

I2d: Departmental PTR standards are clear	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	16.7	7.1
3: Agree (%)	27.8	7.1
2: Disagree (%)	27.8	71.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	27.8	14.3
Total (N)	18	14

I2e: Departmental PTR procedures are followed equitably	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	28.6	25.0
3: Agree (%)	28.6	.
2: Disagree (%)	14.3	75.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	28.6	.
Total (N)	14	4

I2f: Departmental PTR standards are applied fairly	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	26.7	25.0
3: Agree (%)	40.0	.
2: Disagree (%)	13.3	75.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	20.0	.
Total (N)	15	4

I2g: Dept PTR committee members are well prepared and trained	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	13.3	20.0
3: Agree (%)	33.3	20.0
2: Disagree (%)	33.3	60.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	20.0	.
Total (N)	15	5

I3: Overall satisfaction with PTR process	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.3	.
3: Satisfied (%)	43.8	16.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	31.3	66.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	18.8	16.7
Total (N)	16	6

Section J: Pay and Compensation

J1a: My salary is competitive within my department	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	23.8	23.8
3: Agree (%)	42.9	61.9
2: Disagree (%)	19.0	9.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	14.3	4.8
Total (N)	21	21

J1b: My salary is competitive within my college	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	15.8	11.8
3: Agree (%)	42.1	58.8
2: Disagree (%)	31.6	23.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	10.5	5.9
Total (N)	19	17

J1c: My salary is competitive within NC State	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.8	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	5.9
3: Agree (%)	15.8	5.9
2: Disagree (%)	47.4	70.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	36.8	17.6
Total (N)	19	17

J1d: My salary is competitive within UNC system	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.1	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	6.7
3: Agree (%)	42.9	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	28.6	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	28.6	20.0
Total (N)	14	15

J1e: My salary is competitive within discipline at comparable institutions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.1	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	11.1
3: Agree (%)	25.0	44.4
2: Disagree (%)	55.0	27.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	20.0	16.7
Total (N)	20	18

J2: Understand how faculty salaries determined	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.6
4: Very well (%)	20.8	14.8
3: Fairly well (%)	45.8	44.4
2: Not very well (%)	16.7	25.9
1: Not at all (%)	16.7	14.8
Total (N)	24	27

J3: My department links salary increase to meritorious performance	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	28.6	30.8
3: Agree (%)	42.9	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	19.0	15.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.5	3.8
Total (N)	21	26

J4: I have access to benefits information	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	37.5	37.0
3: Agree (%)	50.0	55.6
2: Disagree (%)	12.5	7.4
Total (N)	24	27

J5: Healthcare benefits are competitive with other institutions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.9	2.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	4.5
3: Agree (%)	31.8	31.8
2: Disagree (%)	22.7	36.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	45.5	27.3
Total (N)	22	22

J6: Retirement programs are competitive with other institutions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	9.1	5.6
3: Agree (%)	45.5	61.1
2: Disagree (%)	18.2	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	27.3	.
Total (N)	22	18

J7: Voluntary benefits programs are competitive with other institutions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	11.1
3: Agree (%)	52.6	77.8
2: Disagree (%)	36.8	5.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	10.5	5.6
Total (N)	19	18

J8: I am satisfied with my compensation at NC State	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	4.2	7.4
3: Agree (%)	45.8	51.9
2: Disagree (%)	45.8	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.2	7.4
Total (N)	24	27

J9: Departmental environment enables work/personal life balance	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.0	22.2
3: Agree (%)	62.5	51.9
2: Disagree (%)	8.3	18.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.2	7.4
Total (N)	24	27

J10: NCSU environment enables work/personal life balance	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	12.5	19.2
3: Agree (%)	79.2	53.8
2: Disagree (%)	8.3	19.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	7.7
Total (N)	24	26

J11a: Importance of flexible work hours	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.9	4.0
4: Very important (%)	91.7	96.3
3: Somewhat important (%)	8.3	3.7
Total (N)	24	27

J11b: Importance of maternity/paternity leave	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.9	3.7
4: Very important (%)	91.7	81.5
3: Somewhat important (%)	8.3	11.1
2: Not very important (%)	.	3.7
1: Not at all important (%)	.	3.7
Total (N)	24	27

J11c: Importance of family leave time	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.8	3.7
4: Very important (%)	78.3	77.8
3: Somewhat important (%)	21.7	18.5
1: Not at all important (%)	.	3.7
Total (N)	23	27

J11d: Importance of altering tenure clock for family concerns	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.8	3.9
4: Very important (%)	79.2	85.2
3: Somewhat important (%)	16.7	14.8
2: Not very important (%)	4.2	.
Total (N)	24	27

J11e: Importance of childcare facility on or near campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	3.6
4: Very important (%)	70.8	70.4
3: Somewhat important (%)	20.8	22.2
2: Not very important (%)	8.3	3.7
1: Not at all important (%)	.	3.7
Total (N)	24	27

J11f: Importance of tuition remission for dependents	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.9	3.5
4: Very important (%)	91.7	66.7
3: Somewhat important (%)	8.3	25.9
1: Not at all important (%)	.	7.4
Total (N)	24	27

Section K: Campus Infrastructure/Physical Environment

K1: I have sufficient clerical/admin support in my dept	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	20.8	25.9
3: Agree (%)	41.7	37.0
2: Disagree (%)	25.0	22.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	12.5	14.8
Total (N)	24	27

K2: I have sufficient tech assistance	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	33.3	25.9
3: Agree (%)	54.2	51.9
2: Disagree (%)	12.5	11.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	11.1
Total (N)	24	27

K3: There is sufficient support staff in my college	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	20.8	18.5
3: Agree (%)	58.3	55.6
2: Disagree (%)	16.7	14.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.2	11.1
Total (N)	24	27

K4a: Satisfaction with office space	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	45.8	44.4
3: Satisfied (%)	41.7	48.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	8.3	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	4.2	7.4
Total (N)	24	27

K4b: Satisfaction with lab space	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	11.1	.
3: Satisfied (%)	77.8	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	11.1	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	16.7
Total (N)	9	6

K4c: Satisfaction with classrooms in which you teach	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	8.3	.
3: Satisfied (%)	54.2	41.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	25.0	41.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	12.5	16.7
Total (N)	24	24

K4d: Satisfaction with labs in which you teach	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	10.0	.
3: Satisfied (%)	70.0	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	20.0	40.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	10.0
Total (N)	10	10

K4e: Satisfaction with maintenance of building in which you work	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	16.7	3.8
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	53.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	20.8	26.9
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	12.5	15.4
Total (N)	24	26

K4f: Satisfaction with infrastructure of bldgs in which you work	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	8.3	3.7
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	40.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	25.0	44.4
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	16.7	11.1
Total (N)	24	27

K4g: Satisfaction with availability of up-to-date equipment	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	16.7	19.2
3: Satisfied (%)	45.8	65.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	29.2	15.4
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	8.3	.
Total (N)	24	26

K4h: Satisfaction with availability of office supplies	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	25.0	29.6
3: Satisfied (%)	66.7	59.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	8.3	11.1
Total (N)	24	27

K4i: Satisfaction with availability of informal meeting space	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.2	2.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	7.4
3: Satisfied (%)	33.3	22.2
2: Dissatisfied (%)	54.2	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	12.5	37.0
Total (N)	24	27

K4j: Satisfaction with dining options on campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	10.5	.
3: Satisfied (%)	42.1	52.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	31.6	36.8
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	15.8	10.5
Total (N)	19	19

K4k: Satisfaction with availability of parking	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	8.3	3.7
3: Satisfied (%)	41.7	40.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	29.2	37.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	20.8	18.5
Total (N)	24	27

K4l: Satisfaction with cost of parking	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.8	2.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	4.2	3.7
3: Satisfied (%)	12.5	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	37.5	44.4
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	45.8	18.5
Total (N)	24	27

K4m: Satisfaction with Wolfline	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0
3: Satisfied (%)	90.9	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	9.1	.
Total (N)	11	2

K4n: Satisfaction with commute between Centennial and main	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.5
3: Satisfied (%)	57.1	63.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	21.4	27.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	21.4	9.1
Total (N)	14	11

K4o: Satisfaction with campus safety	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	4.5	8.3
3: Satisfied (%)	81.8	62.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	13.6	20.8
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	8.3
Total (N)	22	24

K4p: Satisfaction with campus aesthetics	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.5
3: Satisfied (%)	54.2	63.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	33.3	25.9
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	12.5	11.1
Total (N)	24	27

K4q: Satisfaction with upkeep of campus grounds	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	8.7	11.1
3: Satisfied (%)	73.9	70.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	8.7	11.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	8.7	7.4
Total (N)	23	27

K4r: Satisfaction with amount of green space	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.4
3: Satisfied (%)	62.5	55.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	29.2	29.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	8.3	14.8
Total (N)	24	27

K5a: Satisfaction with energy conservation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	16.7
3: Satisfied (%)	73.7	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	21.1	11.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.3	5.6
Total (N)	19	18

K5b: Satisfaction with water conservation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	21.4
3: Satisfied (%)	75.0	57.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	18.8	14.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.3	7.1
Total (N)	16	14

K5c: Satisfaction with recycling efforts	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	18.2	20.0
3: Satisfied (%)	63.6	60.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	13.6	16.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	4.5	4.0
Total (N)	22	25

K5d: Satisfaction with alternative transportation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	5.3	14.3
3: Satisfied (%)	68.4	71.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	15.8	14.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	10.5	.
Total (N)	19	21

K5e: Satisfaction with green building practices	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	7.7	20.0
3: Satisfied (%)	76.9	53.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	20.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	15.4	6.7
Total (N)	13	15

K5f: Satisfaction with use of recycled-content resources	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	14.3	21.4
3: Satisfied (%)	71.4	64.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	7.1	7.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	7.1	7.1
Total (N)	14	14

K6: Interest in hotel/conference center on Centennial Campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	3.2
4: A lot (%)	30.4	51.9
3: Some (%)	30.4	25.9
2: A little (%)	26.1	11.1
1: None at all (%)	13.0	11.1
Total (N)	23	27

K7: Likelihood of using conference center on Centennial Campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	3.1
4: Very likely (%)	20.8	48.1
3: Somewhat likely (%)	37.5	25.9
2: Not very likely (%)	33.3	18.5
1: Not at all likely (%)	8.3	7.4
Total (N)	24	27

Section L: Recreation/Wellness

L1: Satisfaction with recreation activities on campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	12.5	.
3: Satisfied (%)	75.0	80.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	12.5	11.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	7.7
Total (N)	24	26

L2: Satisfaction with cultural activities on campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	12.5	7.4
3: Satisfied (%)	70.8	63.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	16.7	25.9
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	3.7
Total (N)	24	27

L3a: Satisfaction with Carmichael Gymnasium	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	13.3	.
3: Satisfied (%)	73.3	77.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	13.3	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	22.2
Total (N)	15	9

L3b: Satisfaction with recreation space around campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	17.6	.
3: Satisfied (%)	58.8	70.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	17.6	20.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.9	10.0
Total (N)	17	10

L3c: Satisfaction with organized Campus Recreation Activities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	15.4	.
3: Satisfied (%)	53.8	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	30.8	40.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	10.0
Total (N)	13	10

L3d: Satisfaction with ARTS NC State programs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	33.3	16.7
3: Satisfied (%)	53.3	77.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	13.3	5.6
Total (N)	15	18

L3e: Satisfaction with Wolfpack athletic events	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	14.3	21.1
3: Satisfied (%)	71.4	68.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	9.5	10.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	4.8	.
Total (N)	21	19

L4a: How often use Carmichael Gymnasium	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	1.7
Once a week or more (%)	16.7	7.4
A few times a month (%)	8.3	.
A few times a semester (%)	12.5	3.7
Once a semester (%)	4.2	.
Once a year (%)	16.7	18.5
Never (%)	41.7	70.4
Total (N)	24	27

L4b: How often use recreational space around campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	1.8
Once a week or more (%)	4.2	.
A few times a month (%)	8.3	3.8
A few times a semester (%)	20.8	7.7
Once a semester (%)	12.5	11.5
Once a year (%)	4.2	15.4
Never (%)	50.0	61.5
Total (N)	24	26

L4c: How often participate in organized Campus Recreation Activities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.7	1.4
A few times a month (%)	8.7	3.7
A few times a semester (%)	4.3	3.7
Once a semester (%)	8.7	3.7
Once a year (%)	4.3	7.4
Never (%)	73.9	81.5
Total (N)	23	27

L4d: How often attend ARTS NC State programs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.7
A few times a month (%)	4.2	3.7
A few times a semester (%)	29.2	33.3
Once a semester (%)	33.3	22.2
Once a year (%)	12.5	14.8
Never (%)	20.8	25.9
Total (N)	24	27

L4e: How often attend Wolfpack athletic events	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	2.7
Once a week or more (%)	12.5	.
A few times a month (%)	8.3	18.5
A few times a semester (%)	25.0	22.2
Once a semester (%)	12.5	7.4
Once a year (%)	20.8	14.8
Never (%)	20.8	37.0
Total (N)	24	27

L5: Interest in designated faculty-only dining facility	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.9
4: A great deal (%)	33.3	37.0
3: Some (%)	20.8	37.0
2: A little (%)	12.5	3.7
1: None at all (%)	33.3	22.2
Total (N)	24	27

L6: Likelihood of using gym on Centennial campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.7	2.1
4: Very likely (%)	4.3	14.8
3: Somewhat likely (%)	13.0	18.5
2: Not very likely (%)	34.8	33.3
1: Not at all likely (%)	47.8	33.3
Total (N)	23	27

Section M: Work Activities

M1: Total hours per week spent performing job-related work (collapsed)	Male	Female
Mean # Hrs Work	53.7	55.6
more than 60 hrs (%)	16.7	22.2
51 to 60 hrs (%)	25.0	37.0
41 to 50 hrs (%)	50.0	29.6
40 hrs or less (%)	8.3	11.1
Total (N)	24	27

M2A: Proportion of total hours spent on teaching/mentoring	Male	Female
Mean % of Time on Activity	37.3	35.4
more than 50% of time (%)	20.8	18.5
26% to 50% of time (%)	37.5	44.4
11% to 25% of time (%)	37.5	22.2
6% to 10% of time (%)	4.2	7.4
1% to 5% of time (%)	.	7.4
Total (N)	24	27

M2a_1r: Includes teaching (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	Male	Female
No (%)	8.3	29.6
Yes (%)	91.7	70.4
Total (N)	24	27

M2a_2r: Includes professional development to improve teaching (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	Male	Female
No (%)	45.8	55.6
Yes (%)	54.2	44.4
Total (N)	24	27

M2a_3r: Includes research projects with students (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	Male	Female
No (%)	33.3	44.4
Yes (%)	66.7	55.6
Total (N)	24	27

M2a_4r: Includes supervising internships/field experiences (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	Male	Female
No (%)	58.3	48.1
Yes (%)	41.7	51.9
Total (N)	24	27

M2a_5r: Includes student thesis/dissertation committee work (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	Male	Female
No (%)	12.5	33.3
Yes (%)	87.5	66.7
Total (N)	24	27

M2B: Proportion of total hours spent advising students	Male	Female
Mean % of Time on Activity	10.0	10.7
26% to 50% of time (%)	.	3.7
11% to 25% of time (%)	25.0	25.9
6% to 10% of time (%)	33.3	29.6
1% to 5% of time (%)	37.5	40.7
0% of time (%)	4.2	.
Total (N)	24	27

M2b_1r: Includes formal advising (among those reporting time spent on advising)	Male	Female
No (%)	21.7	25.9
Yes (%)	78.3	74.1
Total (N)	23	27

M2b_2r: Includes informal advising (among those reporting time spent on advising)	Male	Female
No (%)	60.9	48.1
Yes (%)	39.1	51.9
Total (N)	23	27

M2C: Proportion of total hours spent on research/scholarly Activities	Male	Female
Mean % of Time on Activity	26.7	28.1
more than 50% of time (%)	8.3	11.1
26% to 50% of time (%)	37.5	37.0
11% to 25% of time (%)	29.2	25.9
6% to 10% of time (%)	8.3	11.1
1% to 5% of time (%)	12.5	.
0% of time (%)	4.2	14.8
Total (N)	24	27

M2D: Proportion of total hours spent on creative artistry/literature	Male	Female
Mean % of Time on Activity	0.6	0.0
6% to 10% of time (%)	4.2	.
1% to 5% of time (%)	12.5	.
0% of time (%)	83.3	100.0
Total (N)	24	27

M2E: Proportion of total hours spent on extension/engagement/econ dev	Male	Female
Mean % of Time on Activity	4.6	5.7
26% to 50% of time (%)	.	7.4
11% to 25% of time (%)	12.5	3.7
6% to 10% of time (%)	12.5	11.1
1% to 5% of time (%)	25.0	29.6
0% of time (%)	50.0	48.1
Total (N)	24	27

M2e_1r: Includes service learning teaching/mentoring (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	Male	Female
No (%)	66.7	92.9
Yes (%)	33.3	7.1
Total (N)	12	14

M2e_2r: Includes extension education/non-credit programs (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	Male	Female
No (%)	75.0	57.1
Yes (%)	25.0	42.9
Total (N)	12	14

M2e_3r: Includes economic development training/tech assistance (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	Male	Female
No (%)	83.3	92.9
Yes (%)	16.7	7.1
Total (N)	12	14

M2e_4r: Includes partnering with private sector - job/investment creation (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	Male	Female
No (%)	91.7	85.7
Yes (%)	8.3	14.3
Total (N)	12	14

M2e_5r: Public service grants/contracts (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	Male	Female
No (%)	83.3	57.1
Yes (%)	16.7	42.9
Total (N)	12	14

M2F: Proportion of total hours spent on service work	Male	Female
Mean % of Time on Activity	12.5	10.8
26% to 50% of time (%)	8.3	7.4
11% to 25% of time (%)	25.0	25.9
6% to 10% of time (%)	37.5	33.3
1% to 5% of time (%)	25.0	22.2
0% of time (%)	4.2	11.1
Total (N)	24	27

M2f_1r: Includes advising student groups (among those reporting time spent on service work)	Male	Female
No (%)	69.6	83.3
Yes (%)	30.4	16.7
Total (N)	23	24

M2f_2r: Includes dept/college/university committees (among those reporting time spent on service work)	Male	Female
No (%)	8.7	25.0
Yes (%)	91.3	75.0
Total (N)	23	24

M2f_3r: Includes professional service (among those reporting time spent on service work)	Male	Female
No (%)	26.1	37.5
Yes (%)	73.9	62.5
Total (N)	23	24

M2f_4r: Includes academic program assessment activities (among those reporting time spent on service work)	Male	Female
No (%)	43.5	45.8
Yes (%)	56.5	54.2
Total (N)	23	24

M2f_5r: Includes other university service (among those reporting time spent on service work)	Male	Female
No (%)	34.8	62.5
Yes (%)	65.2	37.5
Total (N)	23	24

M2G: Proportion of total hours spent on tech/managerial innovation	Male	Female
Mean % of Time on Activity	0.8	0.0
6% to 10% of time (%)	4.2	.
1% to 5% of time (%)	12.5	.
0% of time (%)	83.3	100.0
Total (N)	24	27

M2H: Proportion of total hours spent on dept/college admin duties	Male	Female
Mean % of Time on Activity	7.5	9.5
more than 50% of time (%)	.	7.4
26% to 50% of time (%)	8.3	.
11% to 25% of time (%)	8.3	18.5
6% to 10% of time (%)	4.2	3.7
1% to 5% of time (%)	29.2	11.1
0% of time (%)	50.0	59.3
Total (N)	24	27

M3_1: Worked summer at NCSU without overload pay	Male	Female
No (%)	41.7	40.7
Yes (%)	58.3	59.3
Total (N)	24	27

M3_2: Taught at NCSU on overload basis	Male	Female
No (%)	66.7	85.2
Yes (%)	33.3	14.8
Total (N)	24	27

M3_3: Taught NCSU distance education class	Male	Female
No (%)	54.2	59.3
Yes (%)	45.8	40.7
Total (N)	24	27

M3_4: Taught for another academic institution	Male	Female
No (%)	95.8	100.0
Yes (%)	4.2	.
Total (N)	24	27

M3_5: Did outside consulting/freelance for pay	Male	Female
No (%)	41.7	40.7
Yes (%)	58.3	59.3
Total (N)	24	27

M3_6: Did outside consulting/freelance without pay	Male	Female
No (%)	50.0	51.9
Yes (%)	50.0	48.1
Total (N)	24	27

M3_7: Had other secondary employment	Male	Female
No (%)	95.8	92.6
Yes (%)	4.2	7.4
Total (N)	24	27

M4: Frequency of volunteer work past 2 years	Male	Female
Never (%)	4.2	18.5
A few times (%)	41.7	33.3
About once per month (%)	25.0	11.1
Two or three times per month (%)	16.7	25.9
At least once per week (%)	12.5	11.1
Total (N)	24	27

M5: Frequency of public policy work past 5 years	Male	Female
Never (%)	29.2	44.4
Once or twice (%)	33.3	37.0
Three to five times (%)	16.7	11.1
Six to ten times (%)	.	7.4
More than 10 times (%)	20.8	.
Total (N)	24	27

M6: Management of work-related demands of past 2 years	Male	Female
1: Managing everything just fine (%)	8.3	3.7
2 (%)	20.8	11.1
3 (%)	37.5	44.4
4 (%)	33.3	37.0
5: Completely overwhelmed (%)	.	3.7
Total (N)	24	27

M7: Change how you spend your work time	Male	Female
I would change how I spent time (%)	78.3	91.3
I would not change a thing (%)	21.7	8.7
Total (N)	23	23

Section N: Conclusions/Overall Satisfaction

N1: Satisfaction with your "fit" in department	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	37.5	26.9
3: Satisfied (%)	45.8	53.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	12.5	11.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	4.2	7.7
Total (N)	24	26

N2: I generally feel valued in my department	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	45.8	37.0
3: Agree (%)	33.3	48.1
2: Disagree (%)	16.7	7.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.2	7.4
Total (N)	24	27

N3a: I am treated with respect by my students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	54.2	63.0
3: Agree (%)	41.7	37.0
2: Disagree (%)	4.2	.
Total (N)	24	27

N3b: I am treated with respect by dept support staff	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.7	3.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	70.8	85.2
3: Agree (%)	29.2	14.8
Total (N)	24	27

N3c: I am treated with respect faculty in my dept	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	54.2	55.6
3: Agree (%)	37.5	40.7
2: Disagree (%)	8.3	3.7
Total (N)	24	27

N3d: I am treated with respect by NCSU administrators	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	20.8	40.7
3: Agree (%)	70.8	51.9
2: Disagree (%)	4.2	3.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.2	3.7
Total (N)	24	27

N4: I would recommend my department as a good place to work	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	41.7	33.3
3: Agree (%)	37.5	51.9
2: Disagree (%)	12.5	14.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.3	.
Total (N)	24	27

N5a: Amount of stress due to reappointment, promotion or tenure	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	3.1
4: A great deal (%)	30.4	52.6
3: Some (%)	34.8	15.8
2: A little (%)	17.4	21.1
1: None at all (%)	17.4	10.5
Total (N)	23	19

N5b: Amount of stress from research/publication demands	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.4
4: A great deal (%)	47.8	62.5
3: Some (%)	21.7	20.8
2: A little (%)	17.4	12.5
1: None at all (%)	13.0	4.2
Total (N)	23	24

N5c: Amount of stress from professional Development	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.2	2.1
4: A great deal (%)	16.7	7.7
3: Some (%)	16.7	30.8
2: A little (%)	37.5	26.9
1: None at all (%)	29.2	34.6
Total (N)	24	26

N5d: Amount of stress from institutional procedures	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8
4: A great deal (%)	37.5	29.6
3: Some (%)	20.8	29.6
2: A little (%)	20.8	33.3
1: None at all (%)	20.8	7.4
Total (N)	24	27

N5e: Amount of stress from committee work	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.8
4: A great deal (%)	16.7	28.0
3: Some (%)	45.8	32.0
2: A little (%)	16.7	32.0
1: None at all (%)	20.8	8.0
Total (N)	24	25

N5f: Amount of stress from relationships with students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.6	2.2
4: A great deal (%)	.	7.4
3: Some (%)	8.3	22.2
2: A little (%)	45.8	51.9
1: None at all (%)	45.8	18.5
Total (N)	24	27

N5g: Amount of stress from relationships with faculty in dept	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.8	2.3
4: A great deal (%)	8.3	14.8
3: Some (%)	16.7	37.0
2: A little (%)	25.0	14.8
1: None at all (%)	50.0	33.3
Total (N)	24	27

N5h: Amount of stress from relationships w/dept admin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.0	1.9
4: A great deal (%)	12.5	11.1
3: Some (%)	12.5	18.5
2: A little (%)	33.3	22.2
1: None at all (%)	41.7	48.1
Total (N)	24	27

N5i: Amount of stress from relationships w/college admin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.3
4: A great deal (%)	20.8	11.1
3: Some (%)	33.3	37.0
2: A little (%)	37.5	25.9
1: None at all (%)	8.3	25.9
Total (N)	24	27

N5j: Amount of stress from workload	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.2
4: A great deal (%)	33.3	33.3
3: Some (%)	37.5	55.6
2: A little (%)	29.2	7.4
1: None at all (%)	.	3.7
Total (N)	24	27

N5k: Amount of stress from work/personal life balance	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.3
4: A great deal (%)	25.0	40.7
3: Some (%)	45.8	51.9
2: A little (%)	20.8	7.4
1: None at all (%)	8.3	.
Total (N)	24	27

N5l: Amount of stress from working with under-prepared students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.6
4: A great deal (%)	12.5	25.9
3: Some (%)	37.5	22.2
2: A little (%)	33.3	37.0
1: None at all (%)	16.7	14.8
Total (N)	24	27

N5m: Amount of stress from self-assessment Activities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.7
4: A great deal (%)	8.3	19.2
3: Some (%)	41.7	42.3
2: A little (%)	29.2	26.9
1: None at all (%)	20.8	11.5
Total (N)	24	26

N5n: Amount of stress from program assessment requirements	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	3.0
4: A great deal (%)	25.0	34.6
3: Some (%)	25.0	34.6
2: A little (%)	25.0	23.1
1: None at all (%)	25.0	7.7
Total (N)	24	26

N6: Overall satisfaction with NCSU	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	25.0	22.2
3: Satisfied (%)	66.7	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	4.2	7.4
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	4.2	3.7
Total (N)	24	27

N7: More or less satisfied with NC State, compared to 5 yrs ago	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.4
A lot more satisfied now (%)	8.3	18.5
Somewhat more satisfied now (%)	50.0	40.7
Neither more or less satisfied now (%)	12.5	18.5
Somewhat less satisfied now (%)	16.7	7.4
A lot less satisfied now (%)	12.5	14.8
Total (N)	24	27

N8: Ever considered leaving NC State for another university	Male	Female
No - never considered leaving (%)	29.2	25.9
Yes - not very seriously (%)	16.7	18.5
Yes - somewhat seriously (%)	20.8	18.5
Yes - very seriously (%)	33.3	37.0
Total (N)	24	27

N10: Ever considered leaving academe, since coming to NC State	Male	Female
No - never considered leaving (%)	50.0	59.3
Yes - not very seriously (%)	37.5	22.2
Yes - somewhat seriously (%)	8.3	14.8
Yes - very seriously (%)	4.2	3.7
Total (N)	24	27

For more information on the NC State University 2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey contact:
Dr. Nancy Whelchel, Associate Director for Survey Research
Office of Institutional Planning and Research
Box 7002
NCSU
Phone: (919) 515-4184
Email: ncsu_surveys@ncsu.edu

Posted: April, 2007