North Carolina State University
2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey:

Results for the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences
by Number of Years Employed at NC State

To skip directly to a particular section, select the section below.

Section B: Image and Vision	Section I: Post-Tenure Review
Section C: Leadership	Section J: Pay and Compensation
Section D: Faculty-Administration Relationships	Section K: Campus Infrastructure/Physical Environment
Section E: Diversity/Multiculturalism	Section L: Recreation/Wellness
Section F: Working Relationships	Section M: Work Activities
Section G: Faculty Support & Professional Development	Section N: Conclusions/Overall Satisfaction
Section H: Performance Review, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure

To download a Microsoft Word version of this document, click here.

A2: Ever held an administrative position	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
..... No (%)	91.7	84.2	65.5	63.8
..... Yes (%)	8.3	15.8	34.5	36.2
Total (N)	60	76	87	58

Back to Top

Section B: Image and Vision

B1a: Department doing good job of recruiting faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	3.1	3.2	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	36.8	32.4	35.6	32.8
3: Agree (%)	49.1	48.6	48.3	53.4
2: Disagree (%)	12.3	12.2	14.9	13.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.8	6.8	1.1	.
Total (N)	57	74	87	58

B1b: Department creating culture where faculty can develop to full potential	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9	3.0	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	29.3	29.3	25.9	24.1
3: Agree (%)	41.4	41.3	54.1	55.2
2: Disagree (%)	24.1	22.7	18.8	15.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.2	6.7	1.2	5.2
Total (N)	58	75	85	58

B1c: Department retaining most effective and productive faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0	3.1	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	29.6	26.8	25.9	24.1
3: Agree (%)	46.3	50.7	56.5	51.7
2: Disagree (%)	18.5	16.9	15.3	20.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.6	5.6	2.4	3.4
Total (N)	54	71	85	58

B2a: Department national reputation for undergraduate educ	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.7	3.7	4.0	4.0
5: Very strong (%)	25.5	22.2	32.0	34.7
4: Strong (%)	34.0	38.1	40.0	38.8
3: Average (%)	27.7	30.2	25.3	22.4
2: Weak (%)	10.6	7.9	1.3	4.1
1: Very weak (%)	2.1	1.6	1.3	.
Total (N)	47	63	75	49

B2b: Department national reputation for graduate education	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.8	4.1	4.2	4.2
5: Very strong (%)	28.3	43.5	39.0	45.6
4: Strong (%)	41.7	33.3	45.1	33.3
3: Average (%)	18.3	18.8	12.2	17.5
2: Weak (%)	8.3	2.9	3.7	3.5
1: Very weak (%)	3.3	1.4	.	.
Total (N)	60	69	82	57

B2c: Department national reputation for research & scholarly activity	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	4.0	4.3	4.2	4.3
5: Very strong (%)	32.2	48.6	39.1	51.7
4: Strong (%)	42.4	31.9	41.4	31.0
3: Average (%)	18.6	15.3	16.1	17.2
2: Weak (%)	5.1	4.2	3.4	.
1: Very weak (%)	1.7	.	.	.
Total (N)	59	72	87	58

B2d: Department national reputation for creative artistry and literature	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.9	3.7	3.3	3.8
5: Very strong (%)	17.6	21.7	6.7	29.4
4: Strong (%)	52.9	47.8	36.7	35.3
3: Average (%)	29.4	8.7	40.0	23.5
2: Weak (%)	.	17.4	16.7	11.8
1: Very weak (%)	.	4.3	.	.
Total (N)	17	23	30	17

B2e: Department national reputation for tech & managerial innovation	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.4	3.5	3.7	3.6
5: Very strong (%)	.	13.2	19.0	14.6
4: Strong (%)	41.4	37.7	42.9	39.0
3: Average (%)	55.2	35.8	30.2	41.5
2: Weak (%)	3.4	11.3	7.9	4.9
1: Very weak (%)	.	1.9	.	.
Total (N)	29	53	63	41

B2f: Department national reputation for extension & engagement	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	4.2	4.3	4.3	4.3
5: Very strong (%)	39.6	51.5	44.4	48.1
4: Strong (%)	41.7	25.0	39.5	34.6
3: Average (%)	16.7	20.6	13.6	15.4
2: Weak (%)	.	2.9	2.5	1.9
1: Very weak (%)	2.1	.	.	.
Total (N)	48	68	81	52

B2g: Department national reputation for contrib to econ Development	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.7	3.7	3.9	3.9
5: Very strong (%)	15.0	16.1	18.3	24.5
4: Strong (%)	45.0	41.9	57.7	42.9
3: Average (%)	35.0	40.3	16.9	26.5
2: Weak (%)	2.5	1.6	7.0	6.1
1: Very weak (%)	2.5	.	.	.
Total (N)	40	62	71	49

B3a: Grade undergraduate majors' ability to meet prog demands	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.9	3.8	4.0	3.9
A (%)	17.9	19.0	21.1	26.0
B (%)	66.7	53.4	67.6	42.0
C (%)	10.3	22.4	7.0	28.0
D (%)	.	1.7	2.8	4.0
F (%)	5.1	3.4	1.4	.
Total (N)	39	58	71	50

B3b: Grade graduate student ability to meet prog demands	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	4.1	4.2	4.3	4.4
A (%)	33.9	41.4	40.0	42.1
B (%)	49.2	41.4	50.6	52.6
C (%)	11.9	12.9	8.2	5.3
D (%)	3.4	2.9	.	.
F (%)	1.7	1.4	1.2	.
Total (N)	59	70	85	57

B3c: Grade demonstrated professional ability of faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	4.5	4.5	4.5	4.5
A (%)	58.3	56.2	58.6	58.6
B (%)	35.0	39.7	31.0	36.2
C (%)	6.7	4.1	9.2	5.2
D (%)	.	.	1.1	.
Total (N)	60	73	87	58

B3d: Grade professional achievement of faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	4.4	4.4	4.4	4.5
A (%)	51.7	47.2	52.9	56.1
B (%)	36.7	48.6	36.8	40.4
C (%)	10.0	2.8	9.2	3.5
D (%)	1.7	1.4	1.1	.
Total (N)	60	72	87	57

B3e: Grade own demonstrated professional ability	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	4.3	4.6	4.6	4.6
A (%)	37.3	61.1	56.3	58.6
B (%)	55.9	36.1	43.7	41.4
C (%)	6.8	2.8	.	.
Total (N)	59	72	87	58

B3f: Grade own professional achievement	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	4.2	4.5	4.5	4.7
A (%)	30.5	54.8	52.9	67.2
B (%)	57.6	38.4	41.4	32.8
C (%)	11.9	6.8	5.7	.
Total (N)	59	73	87	58

B4: Department's vision for the future	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Clear vision; actively working toward goals (%)	32.2	30.1	36.0	31.0
Vision with slow progress (%)	33.9	43.8	41.9	39.7
No clear vision (%)	28.8	21.9	20.9	29.3
Not familiar (%)	5.1	4.1	1.2	.
Total (N)	59	73	86	58

B5: Agreement with department vision for future	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.4	3.2	3.4	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	44.7	27.8	42.4	42.5
3: Agree (%)	50.0	68.5	53.0	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	2.6	3.7	4.5	7.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.6	.	.	.
Total (N)	38	54	66	40

B6: College's vision for the future	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Clear vision; actively working toward goals (%)	13.6	14.9	21.8	22.4
Vision with slow progress (%)	30.5	35.1	34.5	34.5
No clear vision (%)	32.2	35.1	28.7	39.7
Not familiar (%)	23.7	14.9	14.9	3.4
Total (N)	59	74	87	58

B7a: Department change in next five years	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Change for the better (%)	61.0	59.5	54.0	61.4
Change for the worse (%)	8.5	18.9	17.2	15.8
Not really change (%)	30.5	21.6	28.7	22.8
Total (N)	59	74	87	57

B7b: College change in next five years	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Change for the better (%)	44.1	30.1	32.2	26.3
Change for the worse (%)	6.8	27.4	16.1	17.5
Not really change (%)	49.2	42.5	51.7	56.1
Total (N)	59	73	87	57

B7c: NC State change in next five years	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Change for the better (%)	50.0	37.0	41.4	36.8
Change for the worse (%)	3.4	19.2	11.5	17.5
Not really change (%)	46.6	43.8	47.1	45.6
Total (N)	58	73	87	57

Back to Top

Section C: Leadership

C1a: Dept admin communication with faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	3.2	3.2	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	38.6	42.3	39.3	29.8
3: Good (%)	43.9	40.8	44.0	42.1
2: Fair (%)	15.8	9.9	10.7	24.6
1: Poor (%)	1.8	7.0	6.0	3.5
Total (N)	57	71	84	57

C1b: Dept admin seek faculty input for dept vision	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.4	3.1	3.2	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	55.8	42.6	44.6	38.6
3: Good (%)	30.8	36.8	34.9	33.3
2: Fair (%)	9.6	13.2	12.0	21.1
1: Poor (%)	3.8	7.4	8.4	7.0
Total (N)	52	68	83	57

C1c: Dept admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.1	3.1	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	46.4	38.8	37.8	29.8
3: Good (%)	41.1	41.8	40.2	43.9
2: Fair (%)	5.4	11.9	13.4	21.1
1: Poor (%)	7.1	7.5	8.5	5.3
Total (N)	56	67	82	57

C1d: Dept admin delegate dept responsibility to faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.1	3.1	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	31.5	35.3	29.6	30.4
3: Good (%)	48.1	44.1	51.9	41.1
2: Fair (%)	13.0	16.2	17.3	25.0
1: Poor (%)	7.4	4.4	1.2	3.6
Total (N)	54	68	81	56

C1e: Dept admin grant faculty autonomy	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.4	3.5	3.4	3.4
4: Excellent (%)	53.7	57.7	50.0	54.4
3: Good (%)	37.0	38.0	40.7	36.8
2: Fair (%)	5.6	2.8	4.7	5.3
1: Poor (%)	3.7	1.4	4.7	3.5
Total (N)	54	71	86	57

C1f: Dept admin set clear and explicit priorities	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.7	2.8	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	29.1	22.4	22.2	21.8
3: Good (%)	40.0	31.3	44.4	38.2
2: Fair (%)	20.0	37.3	23.5	23.6
1: Poor (%)	10.9	9.0	9.9	16.4
Total (N)	55	67	81	55

C1g: Dept admin appreciate your contrib to mission	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	3.1	3.2	3.1
4: Excellent (%)	47.2	42.3	40.5	38.6
3: Good (%)	34.0	36.6	39.3	40.4
2: Fair (%)	13.2	12.7	15.5	14.0
1: Poor (%)	5.7	8.5	4.8	7.0
Total (N)	53	71	84	57

C1h: Dept admin conflict resolution	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9	2.8	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	36.4	28.3	19.5	23.1
3: Good (%)	40.9	43.3	50.6	38.5
2: Fair (%)	9.1	15.0	19.5	34.6
1: Poor (%)	13.6	13.3	10.4	3.8
Total (N)	44	60	77	52

C1i: Dept admin provide necessary resources	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.7	2.5	2.4
4: Excellent (%)	26.8	21.4	16.5	8.8
3: Good (%)	39.3	38.6	37.6	45.6
2: Fair (%)	23.2	27.1	27.1	19.3
1: Poor (%)	10.7	12.9	18.8	26.3
Total (N)	56	70	85	57

C1j: Dept admin allocate resources fairly	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	3.0	2.9	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	32.7	32.8	24.7	23.6
3: Good (%)	32.7	38.8	51.9	45.5
2: Fair (%)	20.4	23.9	14.3	20.0
1: Poor (%)	14.3	4.5	9.1	10.9
Total (N)	49	67	77	55

C1k: Dept admin serve as advocate for dept to college	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.1	3.1	3.1
4: Excellent (%)	52.9	37.7	45.8	44.4
3: Good (%)	29.4	43.5	26.5	31.5
2: Fair (%)	9.8	11.6	22.9	18.5
1: Poor (%)	7.8	7.2	4.8	5.6
Total (N)	51	69	83	54

C1l: Dept admin support academic freedom	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.6	3.4	3.5	3.4
4: Excellent (%)	66.0	52.2	59.3	50.0
3: Good (%)	30.2	42.0	30.9	42.3
2: Fair (%)	3.8	2.9	7.4	5.8
1: Poor (%)	.	2.9	2.5	1.9
Total (N)	53	69	81	52

C1m: Dept admin make rational decisions	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.4	3.1	3.2	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	51.9	36.2	42.4	33.3
3: Good (%)	33.3	50.7	37.6	42.1
2: Fair (%)	13.0	4.3	14.1	19.3
1: Poor (%)	1.9	8.7	5.9	5.3
Total (N)	54	69	85	57

C1n: Dept admin make equitable decisions	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	3.2	3.1	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	49.0	38.8	40.2	30.4
3: Good (%)	27.5	47.8	37.8	42.9
2: Fair (%)	13.7	6.0	17.1	16.1
1: Poor (%)	9.8	7.5	4.9	10.7
Total (N)	51	67	82	56

C1o: Dept admin promote diversity within dept	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.1	3.3	3.2
4: Excellent (%)	48.0	38.7	47.5	44.4
3: Good (%)	24.0	40.3	35.0	37.0
2: Fair (%)	20.0	12.9	13.8	13.0
1: Poor (%)	8.0	8.1	3.8	5.6
Total (N)	50	62	80	54

C2a: College admin communication with faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.2	2.4	2.4
4: Excellent (%)	9.6	4.3	9.6	5.3
3: Good (%)	42.3	37.1	37.3	49.1
2: Fair (%)	36.5	37.1	38.6	28.1
1: Poor (%)	11.5	21.4	14.5	17.5
Total (N)	52	70	83	57

C2b: College admin seek faculty input for vision	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.0	2.0	2.2	2.0
4: Excellent (%)	4.1	4.7	9.9	.
3: Good (%)	24.5	21.9	24.7	34.0
2: Fair (%)	42.9	40.6	39.5	34.0
1: Poor (%)	28.6	32.8	25.9	32.1
Total (N)	49	64	81	53

C2c: College admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.1	2.1	2.2	2.0
4: Excellent (%)	4.8	3.4	10.5	2.3
3: Good (%)	28.6	27.6	21.1	29.5
2: Fair (%)	35.7	43.1	44.7	34.1
1: Poor (%)	31.0	25.9	23.7	34.1
Total (N)	42	58	76	44

C2d: College admin grant departmental autonomy	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.7	2.8	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	11.5	18.2	28.9	18.5
3: Good (%)	53.8	40.9	39.8	44.4
2: Fair (%)	9.6	30.3	18.1	20.4
1: Poor (%)	25.0	10.6	13.3	16.7
Total (N)	52	66	83	54

C2e: College admin set clear and explicit priorities	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	2.0	2.3	2.3
4: Excellent (%)	7.0	6.3	11.3	5.7
3: Good (%)	41.9	25.0	27.5	35.8
2: Fair (%)	25.6	32.8	41.3	37.7
1: Poor (%)	25.6	35.9	20.0	20.8
Total (N)	43	64	80	53

C2f: College admin appreciate your contrib to mission	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.5	2.7	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	13.6	20.3	19.3	21.8
3: Good (%)	34.1	31.3	43.4	36.4
2: Fair (%)	36.4	26.6	24.1	18.2
1: Poor (%)	15.9	21.9	13.3	23.6
Total (N)	44	64	83	55

C2g: College admin conflict resolution	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	2.1	2.3	2.1
4: Excellent (%)	6.9	2.4	8.6	4.9
3: Good (%)	44.8	33.3	32.8	29.3
2: Fair (%)	20.7	33.3	39.7	39.0
1: Poor (%)	27.6	31.0	19.0	26.8
Total (N)	29	42	58	41

C2h: College admin provide necessary resources	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	2.3	2.1	2.0
4: Excellent (%)	9.6	8.6	9.2	5.2
3: Good (%)	36.5	38.6	27.6	20.7
2: Fair (%)	28.8	24.3	31.0	41.4
1: Poor (%)	25.0	28.6	32.2	32.8
Total (N)	52	70	87	58

C2i: College admin allocate resources fairly	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.1	2.1	2.1	2.1
4: Excellent (%)	4.7	6.8	5.3	.
3: Good (%)	34.9	33.9	31.6	36.2
2: Fair (%)	25.6	25.4	30.3	38.3
1: Poor (%)	34.9	33.9	32.9	25.5
Total (N)	43	59	76	47

C2j: College admin serve as advocate for college to univ	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8	2.9	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	33.3	17.5	27.6	23.9
3: Good (%)	38.5	54.4	38.2	56.5
2: Fair (%)	17.9	19.3	26.3	15.2
1: Poor (%)	10.3	8.8	7.9	4.3
Total (N)	39	57	76	46

C2k: College admin support academic freedom	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.1	3.3	3.1
4: Excellent (%)	26.7	35.9	39.0	37.3
3: Good (%)	62.2	46.9	48.8	47.1
2: Fair (%)	8.9	9.4	11.0	7.8
1: Poor (%)	2.2	7.8	1.2	7.8
Total (N)	45	64	82	51

C2l: College admin make rational decisions	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.5	2.6	2.5
4: Excellent (%)	12.2	10.8	14.1	9.6
3: Good (%)	43.9	44.6	46.2	48.1
2: Fair (%)	29.3	27.7	24.4	28.8
1: Poor (%)	14.6	16.9	15.4	13.5
Total (N)	41	65	78	52

C2m: College admin make equitable decisions	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.4	2.5	2.4
4: Excellent (%)	10.8	8.2	12.2	4.3
3: Good (%)	40.5	44.3	40.5	46.8
2: Fair (%)	32.4	24.6	28.4	34.0
1: Poor (%)	16.2	23.0	18.9	14.9
Total (N)	37	61	74	47

C2n: College admin promote diversity within college	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9	3.1	3.1
4: Excellent (%)	22.5	31.6	37.2	39.2
3: Good (%)	47.5	40.4	44.9	37.3
2: Fair (%)	15.0	17.5	12.8	13.7
1: Poor (%)	15.0	10.5	5.1	9.8
Total (N)	40	57	78	51

C3a: Univ admin communication with faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.4	2.3	2.3	2.3
4: Excellent (%)	4.3	2.9	6.0	10.7
3: Good (%)	37.0	36.8	32.1	35.7
2: Fair (%)	50.0	44.1	47.6	28.6
1: Poor (%)	8.7	16.2	14.3	25.0
Total (N)	46	68	84	56

C3b: Univ admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	2.1	2.1	2.2
4: Excellent (%)	7.4	4.4	4.9	7.9
3: Good (%)	25.9	28.9	27.9	34.2
2: Fair (%)	51.9	35.6	44.3	26.3
1: Poor (%)	14.8	31.1	23.0	31.6
Total (N)	27	45	61	38

C3c: Univ admin set clear and explicit priorities	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.4	2.4	2.6	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	5.0	8.2	8.4	10.2
3: Good (%)	45.0	42.6	51.8	57.1
2: Fair (%)	37.5	29.5	30.1	20.4
1: Poor (%)	12.5	19.7	9.6	12.2
Total (N)	40	61	83	49

C3d: Univ admin serves as advocate for univ to constituents	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8	3.0	3.2
4: Excellent (%)	25.8	17.5	36.3	40.9
3: Good (%)	48.4	59.6	38.8	43.2
2: Fair (%)	19.4	10.5	17.5	9.1
1: Poor (%)	6.5	12.3	7.5	6.8
Total (N)	31	57	80	44

C3e: Univ admin support academic freedom	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	3.1	3.2	3.2
4: Excellent (%)	36.4	27.9	33.7	49.0
3: Good (%)	52.3	57.4	51.8	36.7
2: Fair (%)	9.1	11.5	13.3	4.1
1: Poor (%)	2.3	3.3	1.2	10.2
Total (N)	44	61	83	49

C3f: Univ admin make rational decisions	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.5	2.8	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	14.7	9.1	11.0	22.9
3: Good (%)	47.1	45.5	61.6	43.8
2: Fair (%)	23.5	32.7	21.9	25.0
1: Poor (%)	14.7	12.7	5.5	8.3
Total (N)	34	55	73	48

C3g: Univ admin make equitable decisions	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.4	2.6	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	6.3	12.8	10.0	23.8
3: Good (%)	59.4	40.4	48.6	33.3
2: Fair (%)	21.9	23.4	32.9	28.6
1: Poor (%)	12.5	23.4	8.6	14.3
Total (N)	32	47	70	42

C3h: Univ admin promote diversity within university	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9	3.2	3.3
4: Excellent (%)	22.5	25.0	37.0	48.9
3: Good (%)	57.5	46.4	48.1	36.2
2: Fair (%)	7.5	21.4	13.6	8.5
1: Poor (%)	12.5	7.1	1.2	6.4
Total (N)	40	56	81	47

Back to Top

Section D: Faculty-Administration Relationships

D1a: I am encouraged to give input on curricular issues	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.4	3.4	3.4	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	48.2	54.2	52.9	50.0
3: Agree (%)	48.2	37.5	36.8	41.4
2: Disagree (%)	1.8	6.9	8.0	6.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.8	1.4	2.3	1.7
Total (N)	56	72	87	58

D1b: I am encouraged to give input on prog assessment	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	3.3	3.3	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	33.3	49.3	44.8	32.8
3: Agree (%)	53.7	36.6	39.1	55.2
2: Disagree (%)	13.0	12.7	13.8	10.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	1.4	2.3	1.7
Total (N)	54	71	87	58

D1c: I am encouraged to give input on dept hiring	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.4	3.5	3.4	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	48.1	62.0	52.3	53.4
3: Agree (%)	46.3	26.8	39.5	41.4
2: Disagree (%)	5.6	9.9	5.8	5.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	1.4	2.3	.
Total (N)	54	71	86	58

D1d: I am encouraged to give input on college admin appointments	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.6	2.7	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	13.0	15.5	16.3	15.5
3: Agree (%)	31.5	39.4	46.5	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	44.4	35.2	32.6	20.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	11.1	9.9	4.7	13.8
Total (N)	54	71	86	58

D1e: I am encouraged to give input on university admin appointments	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.4	2.4	2.5	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	9.4	4.3	11.5	10.5
3: Agree (%)	35.8	45.7	37.9	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	37.7	37.1	43.7	42.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	17.0	12.9	6.9	14.0
Total (N)	53	70	87	57

D2: Familiarity with academic program assessment in dept	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	3.1	3.3	3.2
4: Very familiar (%)	30.4	37.5	46.5	41.4
3: Somewhat familiar (%)	30.4	40.3	38.4	37.9
2: Not very familiar (%)	28.6	13.9	14.0	20.7
1: Not at all familiar (%)	10.7	8.3	1.2	.
Total (N)	56	72	86	58

D3a: Understanding of resource allocation to university	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.0	2.3	2.4	2.4
4: Very well (%)	.	5.6	6.9	10.3
3: Fairly well (%)	19.6	33.3	35.6	32.8
2: Not very well (%)	57.1	48.6	49.4	44.8
1: Not at all (%)	23.2	12.5	8.0	12.1
Total (N)	56	72	87	58

D3b: Understanding of resource allocation to college	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.1	2.2	2.4	2.4
4: Very well (%)	.	5.5	5.7	6.9
3: Fairly well (%)	23.6	24.7	40.2	37.9
2: Not very well (%)	58.2	58.9	47.1	48.3
1: Not at all (%)	18.2	11.0	6.9	6.9
Total (N)	55	73	87	58

D3c: Understanding of resource allocation to department	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.4	2.6	2.7	2.8
4: Very well (%)	3.6	16.4	12.6	19.0
3: Fairly well (%)	39.3	34.2	43.7	46.6
2: Not very well (%)	48.2	42.5	40.2	27.6
1: Not at all (%)	8.9	6.8	3.4	6.9
Total (N)	56	73	87	58

D3d: Understanding of resource allocation within department	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9	3.0	3.1
4: Very well (%)	14.5	26.0	33.3	39.7
3: Fairly well (%)	60.0	45.2	40.2	32.8
2: Not very well (%)	21.8	20.5	24.1	24.1
1: Not at all (%)	3.6	8.2	2.3	3.4
Total (N)	55	73	87	58

D4: Faculty have sufficient input on dept resource allocation	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.7	2.7	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	14.5	15.1	12.9	15.5
3: Agree (%)	52.7	49.3	52.9	44.8
2: Disagree (%)	25.5	30.1	29.4	27.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.3	5.5	4.7	12.1
Total (N)	55	73	85	58

D5: Dept faculty searches/appointments are collegial and inclusive	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.5	3.3	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	39.3	60.3	46.0	65.5
3: Agree (%)	53.6	31.5	43.7	25.9
2: Disagree (%)	7.1	6.8	8.0	6.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	1.4	2.3	1.7
Total (N)	56	73	87	58

D6a: Relations between faculty in dept and dept admin	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.2	3.2	3.3
4: Excellent (%)	46.4	38.6	42.2	44.6
3: Good (%)	39.3	47.1	38.6	37.5
2: Fair (%)	12.5	10.0	15.7	16.1
1: Poor (%)	1.8	4.3	3.6	1.8
Total (N)	56	70	83	56

D6b: Relations between faculty in dept and college admin	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.6	2.8	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	15.7	16.2	20.7	14.0
3: Good (%)	51.0	47.1	43.9	47.4
2: Fair (%)	23.5	20.6	25.6	24.6
1: Poor (%)	9.8	16.2	9.8	14.0
Total (N)	51	68	82	57

D6c: Relations between faculty in dept and univ admin	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.5	2.7	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	12.1	7.1	16.7	15.9
3: Good (%)	60.6	48.2	41.7	52.3
2: Fair (%)	21.2	30.4	33.3	20.5
1: Poor (%)	6.1	14.3	8.3	11.4
Total (N)	33	56	72	44

D6d: Relations between all faculty and univ admin	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.4	2.6	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	13.8	5.6	8.2	11.9
3: Good (%)	44.8	40.7	50.7	52.4
2: Fair (%)	37.9	42.6	35.6	28.6
1: Poor (%)	3.4	11.1	5.5	7.1
Total (N)	29	54	73	42

D7a: Faculty Senate effective commun between faculty and univ admin	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.7	2.6	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	6.9	8.3	11.3	5.8
3: Agree (%)	69.0	60.4	47.9	51.9
2: Disagree (%)	17.2	20.8	26.8	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.9	10.4	14.1	17.3
Total (N)	29	48	71	52

D7b: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty in general	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.7	2.7	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	7.7	10.2	15.4	5.7
3: Agree (%)	69.2	61.2	50.8	43.4
2: Disagree (%)	7.7	18.4	23.1	32.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	15.4	10.2	10.8	18.9
Total (N)	26	49	65	53

D7c: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty like me	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.4	2.5	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	8.0	6.5	9.2	6.0
3: Agree (%)	48.0	50.0	46.2	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	28.0	23.9	30.8	32.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	16.0	19.6	13.8	22.0
Total (N)	25	46	65	50

D8: Effectiveness of university grievance procedures	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9	2.8	2.7
4: Very effective (%)	16.7	25.0	11.4	18.5
3: Somewhat effective (%)	58.3	40.0	57.1	51.9
2: Not very effective (%)	16.7	30.0	31.4	11.1
1: Not at all effective (%)	8.3	5.0	.	18.5
Total (N)	12	20	35	27

D9: Importance of "ombuds" for informal conflict resolution	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.4	3.2	3.4	3.4
4: Very important (%)	41.8	37.5	50.6	53.4
3: Somewhat important (%)	54.5	51.4	41.2	37.9
2: Not very important (%)	3.6	6.9	8.2	8.6
1: Not at all important (%)	.	4.2	.	.
Total (N)	55	72	85	58

Back to Top

Section E: Diversity/Multiculturalism

E1: Importance of institutional emphasis on diversity/multiculturalism	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.5	3.3	3.3	3.2
4: Very important (%)	57.1	40.3	46.0	42.1
3: Somewhat important (%)	35.7	48.6	41.4	40.4
2: Not very important (%)	7.1	11.1	11.5	14.0
1: Not at all important (%)	.	.	1.1	3.5
Total (N)	56	72	87	57

E2: Importance of diversity to enhanced learning in own classroom	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9	2.9	2.7
4: Very important (%)	30.8	24.6	27.8	24.5
3: Somewhat important (%)	40.4	46.2	37.5	35.8
2: Not very important (%)	23.1	20.0	27.8	28.3
1: Not at all important (%)	5.8	9.2	6.9	11.3
Total (N)	52	65	72	53

E3: NCSU prepares students to live and work in diverse society	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0	2.9	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	20.0	14.3	10.5	18.8
3: Agree (%)	57.8	67.9	73.7	68.8
2: Disagree (%)	22.2	17.9	14.5	12.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	1.3	.
Total (N)	45	56	76	48

E4a: My dept recruits historically underrepresented students	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.8	3.0	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	28.9	16.1	27.4	21.6
3: Agree (%)	55.6	50.0	53.4	49.0
2: Disagree (%)	6.7	30.4	11.0	21.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.9	3.6	8.2	7.8
Total (N)	45	56	73	51

E4b: My dept retains historically underrepresented students	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	2.9	3.1	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	32.5	21.8	30.4	25.5
3: Agree (%)	52.5	49.1	56.5	51.1
2: Disagree (%)	7.5	25.5	10.1	17.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.5	3.6	2.9	6.4
Total (N)	40	55	69	47

E4c: My dept supports historically underrepresented students	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	2.9	3.2	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	32.5	19.6	30.0	31.3
3: Agree (%)	50.0	58.9	62.9	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	7.5	17.9	5.7	14.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	10.0	3.6	1.4	4.2
Total (N)	40	56	70	48

E4d: My dept recruits historically underrepresented faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8	3.0	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	20.0	17.2	25.0	29.4
3: Agree (%)	55.6	50.0	53.9	39.2
2: Disagree (%)	20.0	29.7	18.4	25.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.4	3.1	2.6	5.9
Total (N)	45	64	76	51

E4e: My dept retains historically underrepresented faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.8	3.1	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	32.4	18.9	25.7	33.3
3: Agree (%)	45.9	49.1	60.0	52.1
2: Disagree (%)	13.5	26.4	12.9	10.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.1	5.7	1.4	4.2
Total (N)	37	53	70	48

E4f: My dept supports historically underrepresented faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0	3.2	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	32.4	25.5	29.6	39.6
3: Agree (%)	45.9	52.7	57.7	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	13.5	16.4	11.3	6.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.1	5.5	1.4	4.2
Total (N)	37	55	71	48

E5a: Dept environ accepting/respectful of age	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.5	3.5	3.6	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	58.2	50.0	57.6	47.4
3: Agree (%)	34.5	48.6	40.0	45.6
2: Disagree (%)	7.3	.	2.4	3.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	1.4	.	3.5
Total (N)	55	70	85	57

E5b: Dept environ accepting/respectful of disability status	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.7	3.4	3.5	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	69.4	41.7	50.7	46.2
3: Agree (%)	30.6	56.3	45.2	48.1
2: Disagree (%)	.	.	4.1	1.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	2.1	.	3.8
Total (N)	36	48	73	52

E5c: Dept environ accepting/respectful of gender	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.4	3.4	3.5	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	57.1	48.6	54.1	51.8
3: Agree (%)	32.1	47.1	41.2	42.9
2: Disagree (%)	7.1	4.3	4.7	3.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.6	.	.	1.8
Total (N)	56	70	85	56

E5d: Dept environ accepting/respectful of military status	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.6	3.4	3.5	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	64.5	42.9	52.5	52.6
3: Agree (%)	35.5	57.1	45.8	44.7
2: Disagree (%)	.	.	1.7	2.6
Total (N)	31	42	59	38

E5e: Dept environ accepting/respectful of nationality/ethnic origin	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.5	3.5	3.5	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	58.5	51.5	53.7	50.0
3: Agree (%)	37.7	44.1	43.9	44.6
2: Disagree (%)	1.9	4.4	2.4	3.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.9	.	.	1.8
Total (N)	53	68	82	56

E5f: Dept environ accepting/respectful of race and color	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.5	3.5	3.5	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	57.7	49.3	51.2	49.1
3: Agree (%)	38.5	49.3	45.2	45.6
2: Disagree (%)	1.9	1.4	3.6	3.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.9	.	.	1.8
Total (N)	52	69	84	57

E5g: Dept environ accepting/respectful of religion	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.2	3.4	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	47.9	38.1	50.0	48.0
3: Agree (%)	39.6	50.8	42.1	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	8.3	7.9	5.3	2.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.2	3.2	2.6	.
Total (N)	48	63	76	50

E5h: Dept environ accepting/respectful of sexual orientation	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.5	3.4	3.4	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	53.8	40.5	50.8	46.5
3: Agree (%)	41.0	54.8	40.7	44.2
2: Disagree (%)	2.6	4.8	6.8	9.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.6	.	1.7	.
Total (N)	39	42	59	43

E6a: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of age	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.6	3.7	3.6	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	69.1	71.0	63.9	54.4
3: Agree (%)	23.6	29.0	33.7	38.6
2: Disagree (%)	7.3	.	2.4	3.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	.	3.5
Total (N)	55	69	83	57

E6b: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of disability status	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.7	3.6	3.6	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	72.7	62.1	63.5	56.6
3: Agree (%)	27.3	37.9	35.1	35.8
2: Disagree (%)	.	.	1.4	3.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	.	3.8
Total (N)	44	58	74	53

E6c: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of gender	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.7	3.7	3.6	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	69.1	71.0	62.7	55.4
3: Agree (%)	30.9	29.0	34.9	37.5
2: Disagree (%)	.	.	2.4	3.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	.	3.6
Total (N)	55	69	83	56

E6d: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of military status	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.7	3.6	3.7	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	72.5	61.2	67.7	54.8
3: Agree (%)	27.5	38.8	30.8	40.5
2: Disagree (%)	.	.	1.5	4.8
Total (N)	40	49	65	42

E6e: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of national/ethnic origin	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.7	3.6	3.6	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	69.8	68.7	61.3	53.6
3: Agree (%)	26.4	28.4	37.5	37.5
2: Disagree (%)	3.8	1.5	1.3	7.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	1.5	.	1.8
Total (N)	53	67	80	56

E6f: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of race and color	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.7	3.7	3.6	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	71.2	69.1	63.4	53.6
3: Agree (%)	26.9	30.9	35.4	39.3
2: Disagree (%)	1.9	.	1.2	5.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	.	1.8
Total (N)	52	68	82	56

E6g: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of religion	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.5	3.5	3.6	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	57.7	60.6	62.3	55.8
3: Agree (%)	34.6	27.3	33.8	38.5
2: Disagree (%)	5.8	9.1	2.6	5.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.9	3.0	1.3	.
Total (N)	52	66	77	52

E6h: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of sexual orientation	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.5	3.6	3.5	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	63.6	65.2	59.0	55.6
3: Agree (%)	29.5	30.4	34.4	35.6
2: Disagree (%)	4.5	4.3	4.9	8.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.3	.	1.6	.
Total (N)	44	46	61	45

E7: Faculty diversity/multiculturalism enhancement of intellectual diversity in dept	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.5	2.6	2.8
4: A great deal (%)	19.1	15.7	11.8	26.3
3: Some (%)	44.7	38.6	47.1	38.6
2: A little (%)	25.5	22.9	25.9	26.3
1: Not at all (%)	10.6	22.9	15.3	8.8
Total (N)	47	70	85	57

E8: Inclusion of diversity-related topics, scholarship, etc in your courses	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.2	2.0	2.1	2.2
4: A great deal (%)	6.5	9.1	10.0	11.1
3: Some (%)	39.1	25.5	25.0	33.3
2: A little (%)	21.7	20.0	26.7	15.6
1: Not at all (%)	32.6	45.5	38.3	40.0
Total (N)	46	55	60	45

E9a: Interest in research, extension, art endeavors outside U.S.	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.2	3.0	3.0
4: A great deal (%)	47.3	43.7	41.9	38.6
3: Some (%)	34.5	40.8	30.2	29.8
2: A little (%)	14.5	8.5	15.1	21.1
1: None (%)	3.6	7.0	12.8	10.5
Total (N)	55	71	86	57

E9b: Interest in teaching study abroad	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	2.3	2.4	2.2
4: A great deal (%)	18.5	18.6	17.4	22.8
3: Some (%)	29.6	27.1	31.4	17.5
2: A little (%)	18.5	18.6	22.1	21.1
1: None (%)	33.3	35.7	29.1	38.6
Total (N)	54	70	86	57

E9c: Interest in participating in spring break service learning	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.0	1.8	1.9	1.9
4: A great deal (%)	7.3	8.7	5.7	12.3
3: Some (%)	27.3	21.7	23.0	14.0
2: A little (%)	25.5	11.6	23.0	21.1
1: None (%)	40.0	58.0	48.3	52.6
Total (N)	55	69	87	57

E9d: Interest in participating in international service projects	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.5	2.3	2.2
4: A great deal (%)	23.6	18.6	16.1	14.0
3: Some (%)	36.4	34.3	32.2	24.6
2: A little (%)	20.0	28.6	21.8	31.6
1: None (%)	20.0	18.6	29.9	29.8
Total (N)	55	70	87	57

E9e: Interest in teaching in international studies major	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	1.8	1.8	1.6	1.7
4: A great deal (%)	7.3	7.2	3.5	5.3
3: Some (%)	16.4	17.4	17.4	15.8
2: A little (%)	21.8	20.3	11.6	21.1
1: None (%)	54.5	55.1	67.4	57.9
Total (N)	55	69	86	57

E9f: Interest in advising international students	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9	2.6	2.6
4: A great deal (%)	34.0	31.0	24.4	24.6
3: Some (%)	34.0	39.4	38.4	31.6
2: A little (%)	7.5	19.7	14.0	21.1
1: None (%)	24.5	9.9	23.3	22.8
Total (N)	53	71	86	57

Back to Top

Section F: Working Relationships

F1: There is unity/cohesion among faculty in my department	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.1	2.9	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	29.1	31.9	28.7	22.8
3: Agree (%)	43.6	50.0	40.2	54.4
2: Disagree (%)	21.8	12.5	27.6	12.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.5	5.6	3.4	10.5
Total (N)	55	72	87	57

F2a: Good communication between my students and me	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.6	3.5	3.5	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	59.6	48.5	53.8	59.3
3: Agree (%)	38.5	50.0	46.2	40.7
2: Disagree (%)	1.9	1.5	.	.
Total (N)	52	66	78	54

F2b: Good communication between dept and our students	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.3	3.3	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	32.7	33.3	39.0	30.4
3: Agree (%)	61.8	65.2	54.9	66.1
2: Disagree (%)	3.6	1.5	6.1	3.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.8	.	.	.
Total (N)	55	66	82	56

F2c: Good communication between faculty in my dept	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0	3.0	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	23.6	22.5	23.3	26.3
3: Agree (%)	58.2	56.3	52.3	52.6
2: Disagree (%)	12.7	16.9	24.4	19.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.5	4.2	.	1.8
Total (N)	55	71	86	57

F2d: Good communication between my dept and other depts	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.4	2.6	2.9	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	2.3	10.8	19.0	13.7
3: Agree (%)	53.5	47.7	59.5	60.8
2: Disagree (%)	30.2	36.9	16.5	25.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	14.0	4.6	5.1	.
Total (N)	43	65	79	51

F2e: Good communication between my college and other colleges	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.4	2.4	2.7	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	4.9	8.3	9.1
3: Agree (%)	54.2	41.5	58.3	57.6
2: Disagree (%)	33.3	39.0	31.7	27.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	12.5	14.6	1.7	6.1
Total (N)	24	41	60	33

F3: Dept environ promotes respectful dialogue between diverse perspectives	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.2	3.3	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	32.1	33.8	33.7	48.2
3: Agree (%)	54.7	50.7	57.8	39.3
2: Disagree (%)	5.7	14.1	8.4	8.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.5	1.4	.	3.6
Total (N)	53	71	83	56

F4a: Frequency given/recvd teaching advice in dept past few years	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9	2.8	2.9
Frequently (%)	33.3	26.4	22.4	26.3
Sometimes (%)	46.3	47.2	48.2	49.1
Seldom (%)	9.3	12.5	12.9	15.8
Never (%)	11.1	13.9	16.5	8.8
Total (N)	54	72	85	57

F4b: Frequency given/recvd research/artistic feedback in dept past few yrs	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.3	3.4	3.3
Frequently (%)	40.7	50.0	51.2	45.6
Sometimes (%)	50.0	37.5	37.2	43.9
Seldom (%)	3.7	8.3	10.5	5.3
Never (%)	5.6	4.2	1.2	5.3
Total (N)	54	72	86	57

F4c: Frequency given/recvd help with dept/college bureaucracy past few yrs	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	2.9	3.2	3.1
Frequently (%)	29.6	28.2	40.7	36.8
Sometimes (%)	53.7	43.7	37.2	40.4
Seldom (%)	13.0	21.1	18.6	17.5
Never (%)	3.7	7.0	3.5	5.3
Total (N)	54	71	86	57

F4d: Frequency given/recvd help undrsnd reappointment, promotion, tenure past few yrs	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.2	3.2	3.2
Frequently (%)	37.0	36.6	41.9	38.6
Sometimes (%)	38.9	50.7	41.9	45.6
Seldom (%)	18.5	5.6	15.1	10.5
Never (%)	5.6	7.0	1.2	5.3
Total (N)	54	71	86	57

F4e: Frequency given/recvd help with work/personal balance issues past few yrs	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.2	2.1	2.4	2.2
Frequently (%)	9.3	4.3	15.1	14.3
Sometimes (%)	31.5	31.4	31.4	25.0
Seldom (%)	29.6	34.3	30.2	26.8
Never (%)	29.6	30.0	23.3	33.9
Total (N)	54	70	86	56

F5a: Frequency of collab with faculty in your dept	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.7	3.7	3.7	3.7
Frequently (%)	68.5	76.4	80.2	77.2
Sometimes (%)	29.6	18.1	16.3	17.5
Seldom (%)	1.9	2.8	.	3.5
Never (%)	.	2.8	3.5	1.8
Total (N)	54	72	86	57

F5b: Frequency of collab with faculty in other NCSU depts	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.5	3.5	3.3
Frequently (%)	45.3	58.3	60.5	50.9
Sometimes (%)	32.1	30.6	29.1	31.6
Seldom (%)	13.2	11.1	7.0	17.5
Never (%)	9.4	.	3.5	.
Total (N)	53	72	86	57

F5c: Frequency of collab with faculty from other universities	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	3.2	3.3	3.1
Frequently (%)	44.4	42.3	49.4	43.9
Sometimes (%)	38.9	45.1	33.3	29.8
Seldom (%)	9.3	5.6	10.3	21.1
Never (%)	7.4	7.0	6.9	5.3
Total (N)	54	71	87	57

F5d: Frequency of collab with non-faculty external to NCSU	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	3.0	3.1	2.9
Frequently (%)	38.5	43.1	40.2	36.8
Sometimes (%)	23.1	27.8	34.5	29.8
Seldom (%)	17.3	18.1	17.2	19.3
Never (%)	21.2	11.1	8.0	14.0
Total (N)	52	72	87	57

Back to Top

Section G: Faculty Support & Professional Development

G1a: Satisfaction with level of courses	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.4	3.4	3.5	3.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	44.4	40.7	50.0	56.5
3: Satisfied (%)	48.9	55.6	48.3	41.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	6.7	3.7	1.7	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	.	.	2.2
Total (N)	45	54	60	46

G1b: Satisfaction with number of courses	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.4	3.3	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	41.3	43.6	37.7	41.3
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	49.1	52.5	52.2
2: Dissatisfied (%)	6.5	7.3	8.2	6.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.2	.	1.6	.
Total (N)	46	55	61	46

G1c: Satisfaction with choice in courses	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.5	3.5	3.5	3.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	54.3	59.3	58.3	65.2
3: Satisfied (%)	39.1	35.2	36.7	30.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	4.3	3.7	5.0	2.2
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.2	1.9	.	2.2
Total (N)	46	54	60	46

G1d: Satisfaction with course content discretion	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.7	3.8	3.7	3.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	75.6	77.8	70.5	87.0
3: Satisfied (%)	20.0	22.2	26.2	10.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	4.4	.	3.3	2.2
Total (N)	45	54	61	46

G1e: Satisfaction with number of students	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.2	3.3	3.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	37.8	33.3	43.5	47.8
3: Satisfied (%)	53.3	59.3	45.2	47.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	8.9	5.6	11.3	2.2
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	1.9	.	2.2
Total (N)	45	54	62	46

G1f: Satisfaction with quality of undergraduates	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.7	3.1	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	16.2	4.2	18.9	21.4
3: Satisfied (%)	64.9	64.6	69.8	42.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	13.5	25.0	9.4	28.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.4	6.3	1.9	7.1
Total (N)	37	48	53	42

G1g: Satisfaction with quality of graduate students	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	3.1	3.3	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	30.4	21.5	32.0	28.6
3: Satisfied (%)	56.5	70.8	61.3	63.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	10.9	4.6	6.7	8.2
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.2	3.1	.	.
Total (N)	46	65	75	49

G1h: Satisfaction with access to grad TAs	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.8	2.9	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	20.0	14.9	15.7	20.0
3: Satisfied (%)	40.0	57.4	58.8	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	25.7	17.0	21.6	22.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	14.3	10.6	3.9	7.5
Total (N)	35	47	51	40

G1i: Satisfaction with access to grad RAs	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.7	2.8	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	17.1	15.0	11.5	22.7
3: Satisfied (%)	51.2	55.0	59.0	38.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	17.1	18.3	23.0	22.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	14.6	11.7	6.6	15.9
Total (N)	41	60	61	44

G2a: NCSU supports innovative teaching	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	3.2	3.3	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	36.7	28.6	38.2	33.3
3: Agree (%)	53.1	61.9	57.9	61.1
2: Disagree (%)	4.1	6.3	3.9	3.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.1	3.2	.	1.9
Total (N)	49	63	76	54

G2b: NCSU supports innovative research and scholarly activity	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.2	3.3	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	33.3	38.2	40.5	38.6
3: Agree (%)	45.1	47.1	51.2	54.4
2: Disagree (%)	19.6	14.7	7.1	5.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.0	.	1.2	1.8
Total (N)	51	68	84	57

G2c: NCSU supports innovative creative artistry and literature	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.6	3.1	3.3	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	55.6	26.3	44.4	30.0
3: Agree (%)	44.4	57.9	40.7	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	15.8	11.1	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	3.7	10.0
Total (N)	9	19	27	10

G2d: NCSU supports innovative extension/engagement/econ dev activity	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	3.1	3.3	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	38.1	34.5	37.1	43.5
3: Agree (%)	47.6	50.9	57.1	52.2
2: Disagree (%)	9.5	9.1	4.3	2.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.8	5.5	1.4	2.2
Total (N)	42	55	70	46

G3a: NCSU rewards innovative teaching	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.7	2.9	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	23.3	10.2	18.9	18.5
3: Agree (%)	51.2	54.2	54.1	55.6
2: Disagree (%)	18.6	27.1	20.3	11.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.0	8.5	6.8	14.8
Total (N)	43	59	74	54

G3b: NCSU rewards innovative research and scholarly activity	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	3.4	3.3	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	40.9	46.2	44.6	28.6
3: Agree (%)	38.6	46.2	42.2	60.7
2: Disagree (%)	20.5	7.7	8.4	7.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	4.8	3.6
Total (N)	44	65	83	56

G3c: NCSU rewards innovative creative artistry and literature	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.4	2.8	2.8	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	50.0	.	19.2	40.0
3: Agree (%)	37.5	76.9	57.7	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	12.5	23.1	7.7	10.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	15.4	10.0
Total (N)	8	13	26	10

G3d: NCSU rewards innovative extension/engagement/econ dev activity	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.8	2.8	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.7	22.0	17.9	26.8
3: Agree (%)	57.1	42.0	55.2	53.7
2: Disagree (%)	11.4	30.0	17.9	9.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.7	6.0	9.0	9.8
Total (N)	35	50	67	41

G4a: Satisfaction: Availability of classroom technology	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0	3.0	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	30.2	17.9	23.0	40.4
3: Satisfied (%)	53.5	66.1	59.0	51.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	7.0	10.7	14.8	6.4
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	9.3	5.4	3.3	2.1
Total (N)	43	56	61	47

G4b: Satisfaction: Teaching reduction for scholarly/prof growth	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.8	2.7	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	15.8	12.2	11.1	5.4
3: Satisfied (%)	57.9	63.4	55.6	67.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	10.5	14.6	26.7	21.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	15.8	9.8	6.7	5.4
Total (N)	19	41	45	37

G4c: Satisfaction: Teaching workshop/seminar opportunities	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	3.1	3.1	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	20.5	18.2	16.9	28.3
3: Satisfied (%)	74.4	76.4	79.7	65.2
2: Dissatisfied (%)	5.1	5.5	3.4	2.2
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	.	.	4.3
Total (N)	39	55	59	46

G4d: Satisfaction: Avail of funds to attend teaching conference/wrkshp	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	2.4	2.5	2.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	8.7	9.8	11.1	8.8
3: Satisfied (%)	39.1	41.5	46.7	35.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	30.4	31.7	22.2	26.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	21.7	17.1	20.0	29.4
Total (N)	23	41	45	34

G4e: Satisfaction: Learning technology training/support	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0	2.9	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	16.2	21.2	13.6	17.8
3: Satisfied (%)	67.6	59.6	71.2	57.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	13.5	15.4	11.9	15.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.7	3.8	3.4	8.9
Total (N)	37	52	59	45

G4f: Satisfaction: Campus bookstore meeting course needs	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.1	3.0	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	15.6	17.5	14.6	23.1
3: Satisfied (%)	68.8	72.5	75.0	69.2
2: Dissatisfied (%)	15.6	10.0	10.4	5.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	.	.	2.6
Total (N)	32	40	48	39

G4g: Satisfaction: Availability of funds to present work	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.4	2.4	2.7	2.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	7.0	14.3	15.0	7.4
3: Satisfied (%)	41.9	33.3	42.5	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	39.5	31.7	35.0	38.9
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	11.6	20.6	7.5	20.4
Total (N)	43	63	80	54

G4h: Satisfaction: Opportunities for scholarly/professional leave	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8	3.0	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	15.4	21.2	23.6	7.4
3: Satisfied (%)	53.8	48.1	52.8	68.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	26.9	21.2	20.8	14.8
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	3.8	9.6	2.8	9.3
Total (N)	26	52	72	54

G4i: Satisfaction: Financial support for scholarly/professional leave	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.4	2.5	2.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	4.5	6.1	14.7	4.3
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	44.9	32.4	41.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	36.4	34.7	39.7	43.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	9.1	14.3	13.2	10.9
Total (N)	22	49	68	46

G4j: Satisfaction: Leadership development opportunities	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.7	2.9	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	15.4	10.2	11.9	7.7
3: Satisfied (%)	73.1	55.1	65.7	84.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	11.5	26.5	19.4	2.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	8.2	3.0	5.1
Total (N)	26	49	67	39

G4k: Satisfaction: Support for dept assessment Activities	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.7	2.8	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	15.4	8.3	11.9	15.0
3: Satisfied (%)	57.7	60.4	59.7	55.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	23.1	20.8	26.9	20.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	3.8	10.4	1.5	10.0
Total (N)	26	48	67	40

G4l: Satisfaction: Availability of/access to materials via NCSU Libraries	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.4	3.4	3.2	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	41.2	41.2	32.5	31.6
3: Satisfied (%)	54.9	57.4	56.6	63.2
2: Dissatisfied (%)	3.9	1.5	9.6	3.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	.	1.2	1.8
Total (N)	51	68	83	57

G4m: Satisfaction: Support with dealing with student concerns	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.0	3.1	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	28.6	13.0	18.6	15.9
3: Satisfied (%)	62.9	78.3	72.9	77.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	2.9	8.7	8.5	4.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.7	.	.	2.3
Total (N)	35	46	59	44

G4n: Satisfaction: Support for technology transfer	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.6	2.7	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	13.3	7.4	8.5	6.5
3: Satisfied (%)	56.7	57.4	62.0	71.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	16.7	24.1	21.1	8.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	13.3	11.1	8.5	13.0
Total (N)	30	54	71	46

G5: Assignment of formal mentor	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Yes (%)	55.6	45.8	35.3	1.8
No (%)	40.7	54.2	64.7	98.2
Don't know (%)	3.7	.	.	.
Total (N)	54	72	85	57

G6: Mentor helpfulness	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.4	3.3	3.0	4.0
4: Very helpful (%)	53.3	48.5	46.7	100.0
3: Somewhat helpful (%)	33.3	33.3	20.0	.
2: Not very helpful (%)	13.3	18.2	23.3	.
1: Not at all helpful (%)	.	.	10.0	.
Total (N)	30	33	30	1

G7a: Satisfaction: Pre-award support from college for grant/contract	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.7	2.8	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	20.0	15.4	14.7	6.5
3: Satisfied (%)	46.7	50.8	62.7	67.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	22.2	26.2	14.7	15.2
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	11.1	7.7	8.0	10.9
Total (N)	45	65	75	46

G7b: Satisfaction: Post-award support from college for grant/contract	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.6	2.7	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	10.8	4.7	11.8	4.3
3: Satisfied (%)	51.4	57.8	57.9	66.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	24.3	28.1	19.7	19.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	13.5	9.4	10.5	10.6
Total (N)	37	64	76	47

G7c: Satisfaction: Pre-award University support for grant/contract	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.6	2.7	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	20.7	10.5	10.1	4.9
3: Satisfied (%)	41.4	54.4	58.0	70.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	27.6	21.1	20.3	12.2
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	10.3	14.0	11.6	12.2
Total (N)	29	57	69	41

G7d: Satisfaction: Post-award University support for grant/contract	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.6	2.5	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	13.6	5.2	8.6	2.3
3: Satisfied (%)	54.5	56.9	48.6	67.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	22.7	25.9	22.9	16.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	9.1	12.1	20.0	14.0
Total (N)	22	58	70	43

G7e: Satisfaction: Allocation of indirect grant costs to investigator	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.2	2.1	2.3	2.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	.	5.8	.
3: Satisfied (%)	44.8	32.3	39.1	34.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	27.6	43.5	30.4	34.8
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	27.6	24.2	24.6	30.4
Total (N)	29	62	69	46

G7f: Satisfaction: Allocation of indirect grant costs to department	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	2.2	2.2	2.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	3.4	1.8	6.3	.
3: Satisfied (%)	41.4	41.1	32.8	30.2
2: Dissatisfied (%)	34.5	33.9	39.1	41.9
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	20.7	23.2	21.9	27.9
Total (N)	29	56	64	43

G7g: Satisfaction: PI control over indirect cost allocation	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.1	1.9	2.0	1.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	.	10.6	2.2
3: Satisfied (%)	33.3	20.0	18.2	24.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	40.0	45.0	33.3	35.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	26.7	35.0	37.9	37.8
Total (N)	30	60	66	45

Back to Top

Section H: Performance Review, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure

H1: Faculty performance review standards are clearly stated	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0	3.0	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	28.6	29.6	31.7	27.3
3: Agree (%)	36.7	46.5	41.5	45.5
2: Disagree (%)	26.5	15.5	20.7	27.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.2	8.5	6.1	.
Total (N)	49	71	82	55

H2: Faculty performance review procedures are clearly stated	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	3.2	3.2	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	34.7	33.8	37.3	32.7
3: Agree (%)	55.1	53.5	43.4	56.4
2: Disagree (%)	8.2	7.0	18.1	10.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.0	5.6	1.2	.
Total (N)	49	71	83	55

H3: SME is consistent with departmental vision	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.4	3.4	3.3	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	38.5	40.6	40.8	31.5
3: Agree (%)	59.6	57.8	52.6	55.6
2: Disagree (%)	1.9	1.6	6.6	13.0
Total (N)	52	64	76	54

H4: SME is consistent with departmental promotion standards	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.4	3.3	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	40.0	45.9	44.4	34.7
3: Agree (%)	51.1	45.9	45.8	55.1
2: Disagree (%)	8.9	8.2	8.3	6.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	1.4	4.1
Total (N)	45	61	72	49

H5a: Performance Review feedback appropriately based on SME	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.1	3.1	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	46.8	38.8	31.4	34.0
3: Agree (%)	36.2	41.8	50.0	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	14.9	14.9	15.7	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.1	4.5	2.9	6.0
Total (N)	47	67	70	50

H5b: Performance Review feedback helpful for professional Development	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	3.0	2.9	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	42.9	30.4	23.1	20.4
3: Agree (%)	38.8	43.5	46.2	53.7
2: Disagree (%)	16.3	20.3	28.2	22.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.0	5.8	2.6	3.7
Total (N)	49	69	78	54

H5c: Performance Review feedback corresponds with my perceptions of own performance	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.4	3.2	3.1	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	53.1	40.6	25.6	31.5
3: Agree (%)	34.7	46.4	59.0	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	10.2	10.1	10.3	13.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.0	2.9	5.1	5.6
Total (N)	49	69	78	54

H5d: Performance Review feedback helps understand relation to other faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.8	2.7	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	29.2	20.6	15.4	16.7
3: Agree (%)	27.1	38.2	41.0	44.4
2: Disagree (%)	31.3	36.8	38.5	29.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	12.5	4.4	5.1	9.3
Total (N)	48	68	78	54

H5e: Feedback given appropriate weight in merit raises	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.0	2.9	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	41.7	32.4	19.7	18.9
3: Agree (%)	41.7	44.1	52.6	50.9
2: Disagree (%)	16.7	19.1	21.1	17.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	4.4	6.6	13.2
Total (N)	48	68	76	53

H6: Understanding of current Academic Tenure Policy	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.9	3.1	2.9
4: Very well (%)	16.7	21.4	32.5	24.6
3: Fairly well (%)	46.3	52.9	43.4	50.9
2: Not very well (%)	27.8	18.6	21.7	17.5
1: Not at all (%)	9.3	7.1	2.4	7.0
Total (N)	54	70	83	57

H7_1: Participated in RPT process as candidate	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	55.6	25.0	25.0	26.3
Yes (%)	44.4	75.0	75.0	73.7
Total (N)	54	72	84	57

H7_2: Participated in RPT process as voter	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	90.7	27.8	11.9	3.5
Yes (%)	9.3	72.2	88.1	96.5
Total (N)	54	72	84	57

H7_3: Participated in RPT process as review committee member	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	92.6	62.5	41.7	42.1
Yes (%)	7.4	37.5	58.3	57.9
Total (N)	54	72	84	57

H7_4: Have never participated in RPT process	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	48.1	88.9	94.0	98.2
Yes (%)	51.9	11.1	6.0	1.8
Total (N)	54	72	84	57

H8: Understand dept RPT standards	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	3.3	3.3	3.3
4: Very well (%)	27.8	47.1	42.2	44.6
3: Fairly well (%)	44.4	37.1	49.4	44.6
2: Not very well (%)	22.2	10.0	7.2	10.7
1: Not at all (%)	5.6	5.7	1.2	.
Total (N)	54	70	83	56

H9: Understand dept RPT procedures	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	3.4	3.4	3.5
4: Very well (%)	30.2	54.9	50.0	51.8
3: Fairly well (%)	37.7	33.8	42.7	44.6
2: Not very well (%)	26.4	4.2	7.3	3.6
1: Not at all (%)	5.7	7.0	.	.
Total (N)	53	71	82	56

H10: Departmental RPT standards applied consistently/fairly	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.3	3.2	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	32.0	46.7	39.2	43.9
3: Agree (%)	52.0	35.0	43.0	38.6
2: Disagree (%)	8.0	16.7	16.5	12.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.0	1.7	1.3	5.3
Total (N)	25	60	79	57

H11: Departmental RPT procedures applied consistently/fairly	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	3.4	3.3	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	37.0	47.6	43.0	47.4
3: Agree (%)	55.6	44.4	50.6	40.4
2: Disagree (%)	.	4.8	3.8	7.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.4	3.2	2.5	5.3
Total (N)	27	63	79	57

H12a: Sufficient resources for teaching/mentoring students	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.7	2.7	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	14.9	7.4	15.5	12.0
3: Agree (%)	63.8	61.1	46.5	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	10.6	25.9	33.8	32.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	10.6	5.6	4.2	6.0
Total (N)	47	54	71	50

H12b: Sufficient resources for discovery of knowledge	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.7	2.8	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	11.6	8.6	16.9	6.3
3: Agree (%)	60.5	56.9	50.7	47.9
2: Disagree (%)	18.6	27.6	26.8	41.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.3	6.9	5.6	4.2
Total (N)	43	58	71	48

H12c: Sufficient resources for creative artistry and literature	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.4	2.7	2.8	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	44.4	.	13.6	12.5
3: Agree (%)	55.6	66.7	63.6	37.5
2: Disagree (%)	.	33.3	9.1	37.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	13.6	12.5
Total (N)	9	12	22	8

H12d: Sufficient resources for tech/managerial innovation	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.7	2.7	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	21.4	7.1	10.7	8.0
3: Agree (%)	42.9	59.5	58.9	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	21.4	28.6	19.6	28.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	14.3	4.8	10.7	4.0
Total (N)	28	42	56	25

H12e: Sufficient resources for extension/engagement	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.5	2.7	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	18.2	9.8	13.2	16.2
3: Agree (%)	57.6	49.0	51.5	37.8
2: Disagree (%)	15.2	23.5	30.9	37.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.1	17.6	4.4	8.1
Total (N)	33	51	68	37

H12f: Sufficient resources for professional service	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.5	2.8	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	16.7	6.5	16.9	5.9
3: Agree (%)	47.2	53.2	50.6	51.0
2: Disagree (%)	22.2	29.0	26.0	35.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	13.9	11.3	6.5	7.8
Total (N)	36	62	77	51

H13a: Department rewards teaching/mentoring of students	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9	3.1	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	20.5	19.7	28.4	24.1
3: Agree (%)	56.8	57.4	52.7	55.6
2: Disagree (%)	22.7	14.8	16.2	13.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	8.2	2.7	7.4
Total (N)	44	61	74	54

H13b: Department rewards discovery of knowledge	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.2	3.2	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	23.9	34.9	40.8	32.1
3: Agree (%)	60.9	52.4	44.7	50.9
2: Disagree (%)	10.9	9.5	11.8	13.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.3	3.2	2.6	3.8
Total (N)	46	63	76	53

H13c: Department rewards creative artistry and literature	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.1	2.9	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.0	20.0	18.2	30.0
3: Agree (%)	75.0	70.0	59.1	30.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	10.0	18.2	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	4.5	20.0
Total (N)	12	10	22	10

H13d: Department rewards tech/managerial innovation	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0	3.0	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	17.2	20.0	23.6	26.5
3: Agree (%)	65.5	60.0	58.2	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	17.2	20.0	14.5	14.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	3.6	8.8
Total (N)	29	35	55	34

H13e: Department rewards extension/engagement	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.1	3.1	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	18.4	25.0	28.6	28.9
3: Agree (%)	68.4	62.5	57.1	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	13.2	8.9	10.0	6.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	3.6	4.3	4.4
Total (N)	38	56	70	45

H13f: Department rewards professional service	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8	2.9	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	11.6	9.2	23.0	13.2
3: Agree (%)	65.1	66.2	50.0	64.2
2: Disagree (%)	18.6	20.0	21.6	17.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.7	4.6	5.4	5.7
Total (N)	43	65	74	53

Back to Top

Section I: Post-Tenure Review

I1_1: No experience with PTR	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Has experience (%)	10.0	66.7	86.1	93.0
No experience (%)	90.0	33.3	13.9	7.0
Total (N)	50	69	79	57

I1_2: Have had PTR Comprehensive Review	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	96.0	47.8	25.3	14.0
Yes (%)	4.0	52.2	74.7	86.0
Total (N)	50	69	79	57

I1_3: Have served on PTR committee	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	96.0	69.6	49.4	33.3
Yes (%)	4.0	30.4	50.6	66.7
Total (N)	50	69	79	57

I1_4: Have been dept/college administrator in PTR process	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	98.0	91.3	88.6	89.5
Yes (%)	2.0	8.7	11.4	10.5
Total (N)	50	69	79	57

I1_5: Had other PTR experience	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	100.0	97.1	98.7	94.7
Yes (%)	.	2.9	1.3	5.3
Total (N)	50	69	79	57

I2a: Easy to find PTR information on NCSU website	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.9	3.1	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	6.7	13.5	23.5	19.1
3: Agree (%)	73.3	69.2	61.8	57.4
2: Disagree (%)	6.7	13.5	13.2	17.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	13.3	3.8	1.5	6.4
Total (N)	15	52	68	47

I2b: PTR process known/understood in department	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.8	2.9	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	19.0	12.1	18.6	20.0
3: Agree (%)	47.6	56.9	51.4	61.8
2: Disagree (%)	19.0	29.3	28.6	12.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	14.3	1.7	1.4	5.5
Total (N)	21	58	70	55

I2c: Departmental PTR procedures are clear	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	3.0	3.0	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	20.0	18.6	23.9	26.4
3: Agree (%)	50.0	64.4	57.7	64.2
2: Disagree (%)	20.0	15.3	16.9	7.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	10.0	1.7	1.4	1.9
Total (N)	20	59	71	53

I2d: Departmental PTR standards are clear	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8	2.9	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	19.0	15.3	18.3	26.4
3: Agree (%)	52.4	50.8	52.1	58.5
2: Disagree (%)	19.0	32.2	26.8	11.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.5	1.7	2.8	3.8
Total (N)	21	59	71	53

I2e: Departmental PTR procedures are followed equitably	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	3.1	3.1	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	11.1	23.9	26.6	37.5
3: Agree (%)	77.8	65.2	64.1	54.2
2: Disagree (%)	.	8.7	6.3	6.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	11.1	2.2	3.1	2.1
Total (N)	18	46	64	48

I2f: Departmental PTR standards are applied fairly	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	3.1	3.1	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	12.5	28.9	24.6	36.2
3: Agree (%)	75.0	55.6	64.6	55.3
2: Disagree (%)	6.3	11.1	6.2	6.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.3	4.4	4.6	2.1
Total (N)	16	45	65	47

I2g: Dept PTR committee members are well prepared and trained	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.8	2.9	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	15.4	14.9	20.3	22.7
3: Agree (%)	53.8	59.6	55.9	56.8
2: Disagree (%)	15.4	17.0	18.6	13.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	15.4	8.5	5.1	6.8
Total (N)	13	47	59	44

I3: Overall satisfaction with PTR process	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9	2.9	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	16.7	19.1	15.5	18.0
3: Satisfied (%)	58.3	55.3	56.3	72.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	16.7	21.3	26.8	6.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	8.3	4.3	1.4	4.0
Total (N)	12	47	71	50

Back to Top

Section J: Pay and Compensation

J1a: My salary is competitive within my department	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9	2.8	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	6.5	25.8	23.1	19.1
3: Agree (%)	77.4	50.0	41.5	36.2
2: Disagree (%)	16.1	16.1	24.6	31.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	8.1	10.8	12.8
Total (N)	31	62	65	47

J1b: My salary is competitive within my college	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.8	2.6	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	4.3	17.0	14.1	9.5
3: Agree (%)	69.6	53.2	45.3	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	17.4	21.3	25.0	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.7	8.5	15.6	23.8
Total (N)	23	47	64	42

J1c: My salary is competitive within NC State	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.4	2.6	2.4	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	4.5	10.9	13.1	7.5
3: Agree (%)	54.5	47.8	27.9	32.5
2: Disagree (%)	18.2	32.6	41.0	40.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	22.7	8.7	18.0	20.0
Total (N)	22	46	61	40

J1d: My salary is competitive within UNC system	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.4	2.5	2.2	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	4.2	4.8	7.1	8.3
3: Agree (%)	50.0	52.4	26.8	19.4
2: Disagree (%)	29.2	28.6	44.6	38.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	16.7	14.3	21.4	33.3
Total (N)	24	42	56	36

J1e: My salary is competitive within discipline at comparable institutions	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.4	2.2	2.1	1.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	5.4	4.0	9.4	5.0
3: Agree (%)	45.9	38.0	15.6	10.0
2: Disagree (%)	29.7	30.0	50.0	42.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	18.9	28.0	25.0	42.5
Total (N)	37	50	64	40

J2: Understand how faculty salaries determined	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.2	2.7	2.7	2.6
4: Very well (%)	7.4	25.0	20.7	21.1
3: Fairly well (%)	38.9	33.3	40.2	36.8
2: Not very well (%)	24.1	23.6	26.8	26.3
1: Not at all (%)	29.6	18.1	12.2	15.8
Total (N)	54	72	82	57

J3: My department links salary increase to meritorious performance	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0	2.8	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	18.8	28.4	17.3	28.3
3: Agree (%)	66.7	49.3	56.0	49.1
2: Disagree (%)	12.5	14.9	20.0	17.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.1	7.5	6.7	5.7
Total (N)	48	67	75	53

J4: I have access to benefits information	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.3	3.2	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	39.6	38.6	34.1	39.3
3: Agree (%)	54.7	57.1	58.5	51.8
2: Disagree (%)	5.7	4.3	4.9	8.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	2.4	.
Total (N)	53	70	82	56

J5: Healthcare benefits are competitive with other institutions	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	1.9	1.8	1.8	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	2.0	4.6	4.2	4.2
3: Agree (%)	20.0	18.5	18.1	22.9
2: Disagree (%)	40.0	27.7	27.8	37.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	38.0	49.2	50.0	35.4
Total (N)	50	65	72	48

J6: Retirement programs are competitive with other institutions	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.2	2.3	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	2.2	6.9	11.8	10.0
3: Agree (%)	64.4	37.9	35.3	32.5
2: Disagree (%)	20.0	25.9	25.0	35.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	13.3	29.3	27.9	22.5
Total (N)	45	58	68	40

J7: Voluntary benefits programs are competitive with other institutions	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.4	2.6	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	4.4	12.5	5.7
3: Agree (%)	72.2	48.9	46.4	57.1
2: Disagree (%)	25.0	24.4	26.8	22.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.8	22.2	14.3	14.3
Total (N)	36	45	56	35

J8: I am satisfied with my compensation at NC State	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.6	2.4	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	9.9	7.3	3.5
3: Agree (%)	68.5	52.1	36.6	49.1
2: Disagree (%)	27.8	29.6	43.9	36.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.7	8.5	12.2	10.5
Total (N)	54	71	82	57

J9: Departmental environment enables work/personal life balance	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0	2.9	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	27.8	22.9	18.5	16.1
3: Agree (%)	51.9	62.9	60.5	58.9
2: Disagree (%)	11.1	10.0	14.8	16.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.3	4.3	6.2	8.9
Total (N)	54	70	81	56

J10: NCSU environment enables work/personal life balance	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8	2.8	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	17.3	13.9	12.2	12.5
3: Agree (%)	53.8	61.1	61.0	60.7
2: Disagree (%)	19.2	20.8	20.7	17.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.6	4.2	6.1	8.9
Total (N)	52	72	82	56

J11a: Importance of flexible work hours	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.8	3.6	3.7	3.5
4: Very important (%)	81.1	63.9	70.7	64.9
3: Somewhat important (%)	17.0	34.7	26.8	24.6
2: Not very important (%)	1.9	1.4	.	10.5
1: Not at all important (%)	.	.	2.4	.
Total (N)	53	72	82	57

J11b: Importance of maternity/paternity leave	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.8	3.7	3.6	3.7
4: Very important (%)	85.2	70.8	65.9	73.7
3: Somewhat important (%)	13.0	25.0	28.0	24.6
2: Not very important (%)	1.9	2.8	2.4	1.8
1: Not at all important (%)	.	1.4	3.7	.
Total (N)	54	72	82	57

J11c: Importance of family leave time	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.8	3.7	3.7	3.7
4: Very important (%)	83.3	66.7	70.4	68.4
3: Somewhat important (%)	14.8	31.9	28.4	29.8
2: Not very important (%)	1.9	1.4	1.2	1.8
Total (N)	54	72	81	57

J11d: Importance of altering tenure clock for family concerns	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.8	3.7	3.7	3.6
4: Very important (%)	81.5	70.8	73.2	66.7
3: Somewhat important (%)	14.8	25.0	24.4	29.8
2: Not very important (%)	3.7	4.2	2.4	1.8
1: Not at all important (%)	.	.	.	1.8
Total (N)	54	72	82	57

J11e: Importance of childcare facility on or near campus	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.8	3.4	3.4	3.4
4: Very important (%)	79.6	57.7	54.9	50.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	18.5	28.2	35.4	41.1
2: Not very important (%)	1.9	11.3	4.9	8.9
1: Not at all important (%)	.	2.8	4.9	.
Total (N)	54	71	82	56

J11f: Importance of tuition remission for dependents	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.6	3.7	3.7	3.4
4: Very important (%)	71.7	74.6	74.4	59.6
3: Somewhat important (%)	15.1	23.9	18.3	28.1
2: Not very important (%)	13.2	.	6.1	8.8
1: Not at all important (%)	.	1.4	1.2	3.5
Total (N)	53	71	82	57

Back to Top

Section K: Campus Infrastructure/Physical Environment

K1: I have sufficient clerical/admin support in my dept	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.6	2.5	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	15.1	15.5	17.1	10.5
3: Agree (%)	45.3	45.1	31.7	31.6
2: Disagree (%)	18.9	21.1	30.5	42.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	20.8	18.3	20.7	15.8
Total (N)	53	71	82	57

K2: I have sufficient tech assistance	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.8	2.6	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	15.1	18.3	17.3	14.0
3: Agree (%)	37.7	49.3	40.7	45.6
2: Disagree (%)	28.3	26.8	30.9	24.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	18.9	5.6	11.1	15.8
Total (N)	53	71	81	57

K3: There is sufficient support staff in my college	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.6	2.6	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	11.8	7.1	8.5	7.0
3: Agree (%)	52.9	54.3	52.4	49.1
2: Disagree (%)	25.5	31.4	31.7	35.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.8	7.1	7.3	8.8
Total (N)	51	70	82	57

K4a: Satisfaction with office space	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.2	3.1	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	34.0	40.0	37.0	35.1
3: Satisfied (%)	50.9	41.4	43.2	45.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	7.5	15.7	12.3	8.8
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	7.5	2.9	7.4	10.5
Total (N)	53	70	81	57

K4b: Satisfaction with lab space	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.9	2.9	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	19.0	28.8	28.3	11.9
3: Satisfied (%)	42.9	48.1	46.7	61.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	31.0	11.5	13.3	9.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	7.1	11.5	11.7	16.7
Total (N)	42	52	60	42

K4c: Satisfaction with classrooms in which you teach	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.7	2.8	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	24.4	10.2	15.0	14.9
3: Satisfied (%)	48.9	61.0	53.3	55.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	22.2	22.0	23.3	23.4
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	4.4	6.8	8.3	6.4
Total (N)	45	59	60	47

K4d: Satisfaction with labs in which you teach	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.6	2.8	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	36.0	16.7	30.3	12.9
3: Satisfied (%)	32.0	44.4	36.4	61.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	20.0	25.0	21.2	12.9
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	12.0	13.9	12.1	12.9
Total (N)	25	36	33	31

K4e: Satisfaction with maintenance of building in which you work	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.5	2.4	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	11.3	14.3	13.4	12.3
3: Satisfied (%)	45.3	37.1	34.1	43.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	22.6	30.0	29.3	26.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	20.8	18.6	23.2	17.5
Total (N)	53	70	82	57

K4f: Satisfaction with infrastructure of bldgs in which you work	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	2.3	2.3	2.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	13.5	14.1	17.1	14.3
3: Satisfied (%)	36.5	31.0	23.2	32.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	17.3	23.9	31.7	26.8
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	32.7	31.0	28.0	26.8
Total (N)	52	71	82	56

K4g: Satisfaction with availability of up-to-date equipment	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.6	2.6	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	11.3	7.2	11.1	7.1
3: Satisfied (%)	58.5	58.0	51.9	42.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	15.1	21.7	25.9	39.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	15.1	13.0	11.1	10.7
Total (N)	53	69	81	56

K4h: Satisfaction with availability of office supplies	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.8	2.7	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	11.3	12.7	14.6	14.0
3: Satisfied (%)	54.7	59.2	52.4	50.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	18.9	21.1	17.1	19.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	15.1	7.0	15.9	15.8
Total (N)	53	71	82	57

K4i: Satisfaction with availability of informal meeting space	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.7	2.7	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	21.2	14.5	14.1	12.7
3: Satisfied (%)	59.6	50.7	52.6	50.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	9.6	26.1	20.5	23.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	9.6	8.7	12.8	12.7
Total (N)	52	69	78	55

K4j: Satisfaction with dining options on campus	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	2.4	2.5	2.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	5.6	.	10.9	.
3: Satisfied (%)	36.1	54.9	38.2	48.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	38.9	27.5	36.4	25.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	19.4	17.6	14.5	25.6
Total (N)	36	51	55	43

K4k: Satisfaction with availability of parking	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.2	2.3	2.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	8.0	2.9	8.9	1.8
3: Satisfied (%)	62.0	38.6	40.5	40.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	20.0	35.7	25.3	25.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	10.0	22.9	25.3	32.7
Total (N)	50	70	79	55

K4l: Satisfaction with cost of parking	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	2.0	1.9	1.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	3.9	2.9	3.9	.
3: Satisfied (%)	41.2	30.4	18.2	21.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	35.3	34.8	37.7	35.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	19.6	31.9	40.3	42.9
Total (N)	51	69	77	56

K4m: Satisfaction with Wolfline	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.3	2.9	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	4.8	.	16.2	4.3
3: Satisfied (%)	61.9	60.0	62.2	69.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	28.6	13.3	18.9	8.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	4.8	26.7	2.7	17.4
Total (N)	21	15	37	23

K4n: Satisfaction with commute between Centennial and main	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.2	2.3	2.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	5.9	.	7.0	.
3: Satisfied (%)	47.1	41.7	32.6	36.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	35.3	38.9	41.9	28.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	11.8	19.4	18.6	36.0
Total (N)	34	36	43	25

K4o: Satisfaction with campus safety	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.7	2.7	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.7	6.6	5.3	.
3: Satisfied (%)	71.1	67.2	65.3	77.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	15.6	18.0	18.7	16.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.7	8.2	10.7	5.6
Total (N)	45	61	75	54

K4p: Satisfaction with campus aesthetics	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.4	2.4	2.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	2.0	4.4	5.0	1.8
3: Satisfied (%)	66.7	51.5	43.8	35.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	19.6	25.0	38.8	42.9
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	11.8	19.1	12.5	19.6
Total (N)	51	68	80	56

K4q: Satisfaction with upkeep of campus grounds	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.7	2.7	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.1	7.4	8.8	.
3: Satisfied (%)	81.6	67.6	61.3	67.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	6.1	14.7	18.8	23.2
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.1	10.3	11.3	8.9
Total (N)	49	68	80	56

K4r: Satisfaction with amount of green space	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.3	2.4	2.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	2.0	2.9	7.4	.
3: Satisfied (%)	58.8	41.2	43.2	40.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	23.5	38.2	30.9	36.8
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	15.7	17.6	18.5	22.8
Total (N)	51	68	81	57

K5a: Satisfaction with energy conservation	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	2.5	2.7	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	5.1	3.7	6.0	4.5
3: Satisfied (%)	35.9	50.0	58.2	56.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	46.2	37.0	31.3	31.8
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	12.8	9.3	4.5	6.8
Total (N)	39	54	67	44

K5b: Satisfaction with water conservation	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.4	2.4	2.7	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	5.1	4.1	6.3	4.9
3: Satisfied (%)	46.2	51.0	65.1	61.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	35.9	30.6	23.8	29.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	12.8	14.3	4.8	4.9
Total (N)	39	49	63	41

K5c: Satisfaction with recycling efforts	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0	3.0	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	20.0	11.5	14.5	5.8
3: Satisfied (%)	53.3	73.8	75.0	80.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	20.0	13.1	9.2	11.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.7	1.6	1.3	1.9
Total (N)	45	61	76	52

K5d: Satisfaction with alternative transportation	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.4	2.5	2.6	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	7.7	3.6	4.4	4.2
3: Satisfied (%)	43.6	55.4	61.8	60.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	33.3	32.1	25.0	22.9
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	15.4	8.9	8.8	12.5
Total (N)	39	56	68	48

K5e: Satisfaction with green building practices	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.4	2.7	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	16.0	7.5	4.3	3.2
3: Satisfied (%)	40.0	42.5	65.2	61.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	24.0	32.5	23.9	22.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	20.0	17.5	6.5	12.9
Total (N)	25	40	46	31

K5f: Satisfaction with use of recycled-content resources	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.7	3.0	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	15.4	12.9	7.0	5.3
3: Satisfied (%)	46.2	51.6	81.4	68.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	23.1	32.3	11.6	18.4
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	15.4	3.2	.	7.9
Total (N)	26	31	43	38

K6: Interest in hotel/conference center on Centennial Campus	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.7	2.6	2.5
4: A lot (%)	23.1	28.2	34.1	28.6
3: Some (%)	26.9	32.4	19.5	19.6
2: A little (%)	23.1	18.3	22.0	23.2
1: None at all (%)	26.9	21.1	24.4	28.6
Total (N)	52	71	82	56

K7: Likelihood of using conference center on Centennial Campus	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9	2.9	2.6
4: Very likely (%)	32.7	29.6	37.0	24.6
3: Somewhat likely (%)	30.8	40.8	24.7	31.6
2: Not very likely (%)	25.0	19.7	24.7	19.3
1: Not at all likely (%)	11.5	9.9	13.6	24.6
Total (N)	52	71	81	57

Back to Top

Section L: Recreation/Wellness

L1: Satisfaction with recreation activities on campus	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0	3.0	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	3.9	14.1	17.5	8.9
3: Satisfied (%)	88.2	71.8	68.8	73.2
2: Dissatisfied (%)	7.8	11.3	12.5	14.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	2.8	1.3	3.6
Total (N)	51	71	80	56

L2: Satisfaction with cultural activities on campus	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8	3.0	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	8.6	9.9	7.0
3: Satisfied (%)	78.8	67.1	80.2	75.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	19.2	17.1	9.9	10.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	1.9	7.1	.	7.0
Total (N)	52	70	81	57

L3a: Satisfaction with Carmichael Gymnasium	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.1	3.1	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	17.9	24.5	28.6	22.2
3: Satisfied (%)	64.3	65.3	57.1	60.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	14.3	6.1	8.9	11.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	3.6	4.1	5.4	6.7
Total (N)	28	49	56	45

L3b: Satisfaction with recreation space around campus	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9	3.0	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	16.0	11.4	19.6	15.9
3: Satisfied (%)	72.0	75.0	58.9	59.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	12.0	9.1	19.6	20.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	4.5	1.8	4.5
Total (N)	25	44	56	44

L3c: Satisfaction with organized Campus Recreation Activities	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.8	3.1	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	8.0	22.2	8.8
3: Satisfied (%)	100.0	72.0	66.7	76.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	16.0	11.1	8.8
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	4.0	.	5.9
Total (N)	14	25	36	34

L3d: Satisfaction with ARTS NC State programs	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9	3.0	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	10.3	15.7	11.6
3: Satisfied (%)	86.7	71.8	74.5	62.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	6.7	17.9	7.8	20.9
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.7	.	2.0	4.7
Total (N)	15	39	51	43

L3e: Satisfaction with Wolfpack athletic events	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9	2.9	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	8.3	9.3	16.4	11.9
3: Satisfied (%)	79.2	76.7	60.7	57.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	8.3	11.6	16.4	16.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	4.2	2.3	6.6	14.3
Total (N)	24	43	61	42

L4a: How often use Carmichael Gymnasium	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	3.4	3.2	3.3
Once a week or more (%)	15.1	29.6	25.6	28.1
A few times a month (%)	9.4	11.3	8.5	14.0
A few times a semester (%)	17.0	11.3	13.4	7.0
Once a semester (%)	1.9	2.8	7.3	3.5
Once a year (%)	5.7	5.6	4.9	8.8
Never (%)	50.9	39.4	40.2	38.6
Total (N)	53	71	82	57

L4b: How often use recreational space around campus	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	2.3	2.6	2.7
Once a week or more (%)	9.4	2.9	5.0	12.5
A few times a month (%)	5.7	7.1	10.0	8.9
A few times a semester (%)	13.2	17.1	21.3	17.9
Once a semester (%)	5.7	10.0	10.0	3.6
Once a year (%)	5.7	14.3	6.3	7.1
Never (%)	60.4	48.6	47.5	50.0
Total (N)	53	70	80	56

L4c: How often participate in organized Campus Recreation Activities	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	1.3	1.8	1.5	1.8
Once a week or more (%)	1.9	1.4	3.7	.
A few times a month (%)	1.9	7.1	3.7	5.3
A few times a semester (%)	1.9	8.6	3.7	14.0
Once a semester (%)	1.9	4.3	3.7	3.5
Once a year (%)	1.9	10.0	3.7	7.0
Never (%)	90.6	68.6	81.7	70.2
Total (N)	53	70	82	57

L4d: How often attend ARTS NC State programs	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	1.7	2.2	2.5	2.5
Once a week or more (%)	.	.	1.2	.
A few times a month (%)	3.8	1.4	2.4	5.4
A few times a semester (%)	1.9	19.7	23.2	21.4
Once a semester (%)	18.9	18.3	22.0	23.2
Once a year (%)	11.3	19.7	20.7	17.9
Never (%)	64.2	40.8	30.5	32.1
Total (N)	53	71	82	56

L4e: How often attend Wolfpack athletic events	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.2	2.5	2.8	2.5
Once a week or more (%)	1.9	.	3.7	5.4
A few times a month (%)	3.8	8.6	13.4	7.1
A few times a semester (%)	17.0	25.7	22.0	17.9
Once a semester (%)	11.3	18.6	7.3	16.1
Once a year (%)	18.9	4.3	24.4	10.7
Never (%)	47.2	42.9	29.3	42.9
Total (N)	53	70	82	56

L5: Interest in designated faculty-only dining facility	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	2.2	2.2	2.3
4: A great deal (%)	22.6	18.3	22.0	19.3
3: Some (%)	22.6	25.4	22.0	26.3
2: A little (%)	18.9	16.9	13.4	15.8
1: None at all (%)	35.8	39.4	42.7	38.6
Total (N)	53	71	82	57

L6: Likelihood of using gym on Centennial campus	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.0	1.7	1.8	1.7
4: Very likely (%)	15.1	8.5	7.3	10.5
3: Somewhat likely (%)	20.8	15.5	18.3	8.8
2: Not very likely (%)	17.0	18.3	22.0	17.5
1: Not at all likely (%)	47.2	57.7	52.4	63.2
Total (N)	53	71	82	57

Back to Top

Section M: Work Activities

M1: Total hours per week spent performing job-related work (collapsed)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean # Hrs Work	58.1	53.9	54.6	56.7
more than 60 hrs (%)	23.1	14.5	16.0	16.7
51 to 60 hrs (%)	40.4	37.7	45.7	44.4
41 to 50 hrs (%)	34.6	40.6	33.3	37.0
40 hrs or less (%)	1.9	7.2	4.9	1.9
Total (N)	52	69	81	54

M2A: Proportion of total hours spent on teaching/mentoring	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean % of Time on Activity	29.1	22.1	24.5	32.9
more than 50% of time (%)	15.4	5.6	7.3	22.8
26% to 50% of time (%)	28.8	19.7	34.1	28.1
11% to 25% of time (%)	28.8	36.6	19.5	19.3
6% to 10% of time (%)	11.5	23.9	15.9	10.5
1% to 5% of time (%)	7.7	5.6	15.9	14.0
0% of time (%)	7.7	8.5	7.3	5.3
Total (N)	52	71	82	57

M2a_1r: Includes teaching (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	8.3	21.5	38.2	29.6
Yes (%)	91.7	78.5	61.8	70.4
Total (N)	48	65	76	54

M2a_2r: Includes professional development to improve teaching (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	47.9	72.3	64.5	59.3
Yes (%)	52.1	27.7	35.5	40.7
Total (N)	48	65	76	54

M2a_3r: Includes research projects with students (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	12.5	21.5	31.6	33.3
Yes (%)	87.5	78.5	68.4	66.7
Total (N)	48	65	76	54

M2a_4r: Includes supervising internships/field experiences (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	56.3	73.8	69.7	68.5
Yes (%)	43.8	26.2	30.3	31.5
Total (N)	48	65	76	54

M2a_5r: Includes student thesis/dissertation committee work (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	16.7	13.8	22.4	25.9
Yes (%)	83.3	86.2	77.6	74.1
Total (N)	48	65	76	54

M2B: Proportion of total hours spent advising students	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean % of Time on Activity	7.0	4.6	4.9	6.5
26% to 50% of time (%)	3.8	.	.	1.8
11% to 25% of time (%)	9.6	5.6	13.4	7.0
6% to 10% of time (%)	21.2	19.7	8.5	26.3
1% to 5% of time (%)	42.3	43.7	41.5	38.6
0% of time (%)	23.1	31.0	36.6	26.3
Total (N)	52	71	82	57

M2b_1r: Includes formal advising (among those reporting time spent on advising)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	17.5	24.5	38.5	28.6
Yes (%)	82.5	75.5	61.5	71.4
Total (N)	40	49	52	42

M2b_2r: Includes informal advising (among those reporting time spent on advising)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	20.0	38.8	34.6	35.7
Yes (%)	80.0	61.2	65.4	64.3
Total (N)	40	49	52	42

M2C: Proportion of total hours spent on research/scholarly Activities	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean % of Time on Activity	38.3	36.5	30.8	34.0
more than 50% of time (%)	32.7	22.5	17.1	22.8
26% to 50% of time (%)	30.8	43.7	36.6	26.3
11% to 25% of time (%)	17.3	16.9	22.0	31.6
6% to 10% of time (%)	1.9	7.0	8.5	7.0
1% to 5% of time (%)	5.8	2.8	6.1	5.3
0% of time (%)	11.5	7.0	9.8	7.0
Total (N)	52	71	82	57

M2D: Proportion of total hours spent on creative artistry/literature	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean % of Time on Activity	0.2	1.2	0.4	1.2
26% to 50% of time (%)	.	1.4	.	1.8
11% to 25% of time (%)	.	1.4	.	.
6% to 10% of time (%)	1.9	1.4	1.2	3.5
1% to 5% of time (%)	.	2.8	4.9	1.8
0% of time (%)	98.1	93.0	93.9	93.0
Total (N)	52	71	82	57

M2E: Proportion of total hours spent on extension/engagement/econ dev	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean % of Time on Activity	12.1	20.7	19.3	12.7
more than 50% of time (%)	11.5	14.1	12.2	7.0
26% to 50% of time (%)	3.8	18.3	17.1	12.3
11% to 25% of time (%)	7.7	7.0	11.0	5.3
6% to 10% of time (%)	5.8	7.0	7.3	10.5
1% to 5% of time (%)	11.5	19.7	15.9	21.1
0% of time (%)	59.6	33.8	36.6	43.9
Total (N)	52	71	82	57

M2e_1r: Includes service learning teaching/mentoring (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	61.9	85.1	78.8	65.6
Yes (%)	38.1	14.9	21.2	34.4
Total (N)	21	47	52	32

M2e_2r: Includes extension education/non-credit programs (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	19.0	44.7	26.9	53.1
Yes (%)	81.0	55.3	73.1	46.9
Total (N)	21	47	52	32

M2e_3r: Includes economic development training/tech assistance (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	85.7	70.2	63.5	65.6
Yes (%)	14.3	29.8	36.5	34.4
Total (N)	21	47	52	32

M2e_4r: Includes partnering with private sector - job/investment creation (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	81.0	83.0	65.4	78.1
Yes (%)	19.0	17.0	34.6	21.9
Total (N)	21	47	52	32

M2e_5r: Public service grants/contracts (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	61.9	66.0	55.8	81.3
Yes (%)	38.1	34.0	44.2	18.8
Total (N)	21	47	52	32

M2F: Proportion of total hours spent on service work	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean % of Time on Activity	6.6	8.1	8.1	5.9
26% to 50% of time (%)	1.9	1.4	.	.
11% to 25% of time (%)	9.6	12.7	19.5	7.0
6% to 10% of time (%)	17.3	32.4	30.5	26.3
1% to 5% of time (%)	57.7	38.0	36.6	50.9
0% of time (%)	13.5	15.5	13.4	15.8
Total (N)	52	71	82	57

M2f_1r: Includes advising student groups (among those reporting time spent on service work)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	75.6	86.7	78.9	70.8
Yes (%)	24.4	13.3	21.1	29.2
Total (N)	45	60	71	48

M2f_2r: Includes dept/college/university committees (among those reporting time spent on service work)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	20.0	23.3	14.1	14.6
Yes (%)	80.0	76.7	85.9	85.4
Total (N)	45	60	71	48

M2f_3r: Includes professional service (among those reporting time spent on service work)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	26.7	33.3	21.1	29.2
Yes (%)	73.3	66.7	78.9	70.8
Total (N)	45	60	71	48

M2f_4r: Includes academic program assessment activities (among those reporting time spent on service work)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	77.8	81.7	74.6	79.2
Yes (%)	22.2	18.3	25.4	20.8
Total (N)	45	60	71	48

M2f_5r: Includes other university service (among those reporting time spent on service work)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	71.1	66.7	64.8	60.4
Yes (%)	28.9	33.3	35.2	39.6